Module 8 #Organizational structures

18
Organizational Behavior Module 8: Organizational Structures Vinay Kumar, Ph.D Vidisha Garg, MBA ICBM-SBE, 2014

description

This is the eighth of ten modules in which I am organizing my delivery of the course on organizational behavior at ICBM-SBE, 2014. Wherever I felt I used copyrighted content, I tried to make sure I gave appropriate credit to the author/source. In case you see that I missed something, please do let me know. I would be happy to improve.

Transcript of Module 8 #Organizational structures

Page 1: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Organizational Behavior

Module 8: Organizational Structures

Vinay Kumar, Ph.D

Vidisha Garg, MBA

ICBM-SBE, 2014

Page 2: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Why structure?

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 2

First, there is ‘me’ Then, there is ‘what I hear’ Later, there is ‘what someone clarifies’ My question: Where was I ‘best’ informed?

Page 3: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Organizational structure

• Defines how

– Job tasks are formally

• divided

• grouped

• coordinated

• Organizations use structures to manage areas such as

– Work specialization

– Departmentalization

– Chain of command

– Span of control

– Centralization / Decentralization

– Formalization

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 3

Page 4: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Key questions and areas to look for answers

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 4

Source: Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior,15th Edition. Pearson: New Jersey.

Division

Grouping

Coordination

Page 5: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Work specialization

• Q1: Why does productivity seem to

improve with lack of specialization?

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 5

Source: Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior,15th Edition. Pearson: New Jersey.

• Q2: Why does productivity seem to

decline with increasing specialization?

Page 6: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Departmentalization

• Bases (indicative list, not exhaustive)

– Product

– Geography

– Nature of tasks

– Similarity in tasks

– Nature of stakeholders

– Frequency of interaction

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 6

Puzzle: Imagine that a graduate in finance finds place in the accounting department. And he is placed in the function of managing payrolls. How do you think this aspiring graduate can plan his career further?

Page 7: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Elements of coordination

• Chain of command

– Unity: One boss for any employee

– Authority: Inherent capacity of a position to give orders and get compliance

• Span of control (number of subordinates for a given superior)

– Determines the number of levels in the organization (Depth of hierarchy)

• Centralization/Decentralization

– Degree to which resources are concentrated or spread

– Resources could include: information, decision-making authority, operations etc

• Formalization

– Degree to which jobs and work flows are standardized

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 7

Page 8: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Mintzberg’s coordination mechanisms

• Mutual adjustment

• Direct supervision

• Standardization of

– skills and knowledge

– work processes

– output

– norms

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 8

Source: http://goodschool.cphwest.dk/Chapter%201%20to%205/Chapter%202_clip_image004.gif

Page 9: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Common organizational designs

• Simple

• Bureaucratic

• Matrix

• Virtual

• Boundary-less

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 9

Characteristics (indicative, not necessarily valid)

• Work Specialization : Low

• Departmentalization : Not Specific

• Chain of command : Strong

• Depth of hierarchy : Flat

• Centralization : High

• Formalization : Low

• Example : Local retail store

Page 10: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Common organizational designs

• Simple

• Bureaucratic

• Matrix

• Virtual

• Boundary-less

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 10

Characteristics (indicative, not necessarily valid)

• Work Specialization : High

• Departmentalization : Very Specific

• Chain of command : Strong

• Depth of hierarchy : Deep

• Centralization : Low

• Formalization : High

• Example : Govt. Tax Office

Go to this link: http://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/ccit/rtipage.asp And read: Information under section 4(1)(b) of the RTI Act

Page 11: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Common organizational designs

• Simple

• Bureaucratic

• Matrix

• Virtual

• Boundary-less

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 11

Characteristics (indicative, not necessarily valid)

• Work Specialization : Moderate

• Departmentalization : Crossed

• Chain of command : Split/Shared

• Depth of Hierarchy : Moderate

• Centralization : Moderate

• Formalization : Moderate

• Example : Your college

Page 12: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Common organizational designs

• Simple

• Bureaucratic

• Matrix

• Virtual

• Boundary-less

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 12

Characteristics (indicative, not necessarily valid)

• Work Specialization : High

• Departmentalization : NA

• Chain of command : NA

• Depth of hierarchy : NA

• Centralization : Low

• Formalization : Low

• Visit : sourceforge.net

Caution: Virtual organizations can sometimes be overrated. Whether they are effective or not really depends on at least two things: (i) role clarity among individuals, and (ii) the need for coordination.

Page 13: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Common organizational designs

• Simple

• Bureaucratic

• Matrix

• Virtual

• Boundary-less

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 13

Characteristics (indicative, not necessarily valid)

• Work Specialization : Rounded

• Departmentalization : NA

• Chain of command : NA

• Depth of hierarchy : NA

• Centralization : Low

• Formalization : Low

• Example : McKinsey

Caution: The premise of boundary-less organizations is that empowered employees behave responsibly. And that requires, if not organizational structures, reciprocation from employees to serve their firm.

Page 14: Module 8 #Organizational structures

What affects organizational design choice?

• Some common factors include

– Size

– Technology

– Environment

• Critical factor that drives the choice, however is ‘strategy’

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 14

Source: Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior,15th Edition. Pearson: New Jersey.

Page 15: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Mechanistic vs. Organic Models

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 15

Source: Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior,15th Edition. Pearson: New Jersey.

The Trade-off

Consistency/Constraint Vs.

Creativity/Freedom

How would you decide?

Page 16: Module 8 #Organizational structures

Simplified model of the structure dynamic

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 16

Source: Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior,15th Edition. Pearson: New Jersey.

Page 17: Module 8 #Organizational structures

For discussion

• What according to you is the best way of coordinating: mutual adjustments

or standardization? What are your reasons for the selection you make?

• Do you think structure can communicate with people? How does it

accomplish such communication?

• To what extent do you think individual performance is a function of

organizational structure?

• Would organizations with similar businesses and similar goals in two

countries be structured alike? Why or why not?

• What do you understand by ‘restructuring’ an organization? And how do you

think that is done?

Vinay Kumar; Vidisha Garg 17

Page 18: Module 8 #Organizational structures

End of module 8.

Please post your feedback for this session to [email protected] / [email protected]

Do not forget to mention the ‘session date/section’ details

Upcoming

Module 9: Power and Politics