Modification 0279 - Improving the availability of meter read history and asset information

Topic raised at July 2009 Distribution Workstream Draft proposal was to create a reporting service, placing obligation on GTs to

provide service defined in UNC Proposer discussed topic with xoserve in to determine viability xoserve reviewed data content and recommended making the proposal a

“permissions” arrangement to enable xoserve to provide services tailored to customers needs

Proposer refined draft proposal in light of xoserve review with regard to data content, but not service definition

Proposal raised by GDF in November 2009 User Pays proposal, cost recovery 100% shippers, development service and

ongoing service defined ROM costs provided, included in final modification report (February 2010) ACS submitted using cost recovery basis defined in proposal, and approved Mod approved by Ofgem in July 2010

Modification 0279 - Improving the availability of meter read history and asset information

xoserve observations:

UNC User Pays proposal successfully implemented

Discussion with xoserve prior to raising proposal speeded up proposal development

xoserve provided input to draft proposal, some suggestions accepted, some not, proposers prerogative

Although xoserve put forward suggestion to enable a more flexible service arrangements for the community (our customers), these were not pursued by the proposer or the Distribution Workstream. Therefore, commercial matters are not always in xoserve’s control.

Given this learning point what are the solution options?