Modernizing Freight Rail Regulation: Recommendations from the TRB Study
-
Upload
mercatus-center -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
511 -
download
4
Transcript of Modernizing Freight Rail Regulation: Recommendations from the TRB Study
Modernizing Freight Rail Regulation:Recommendations from the TRB Study*
Jerry Ellig, Ph.DSenior Research FellowMercatus Center at George Mason University
*The speaker served on the committee that produced the TRB report, but unless otherwise indicated, opinions and conclusions in this presentation are solely those of the speaker.
mercatus.org
Staggers Act’s partial deregulation
• Deregulated most rates• Legalized confidential contracting• Liberalized abandonment of unprofitable
lines• Time limits for merger decisions under
“public interest” standard• Ended “open routing”
mercatus.org
Staggers Act’s effects
Figures in $1998. Source: Jerry Ellig, “Railroad Deregulation and Consumer Welfare,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 21:2 (2002)
mercatus.org
More recent rate trends
Source: Transportation Research Board, Modernizing Freight Rail Regulation (2015), p. 55.
mercatus.org
Lingering controversies• Maximum rate regulation
• Mandated switching
• Revenue adequacy
• Service complaints
• Merger approval
mercatus.org
Current rate regulation
• Rate exceeds 180% of “variable cost”
• Absence of effective transportation competition
• Rate exceeds “stand-alone cost”-- or one of several simpler
benchmarks
mercatus.org
Problem: Cost allocation is arbitrary
180% R/VC thresholds under different cost allocation rules
mercatus.org
Percent of ton-miles priced <100% R/VC
mercatus.org
2001-02 2003-04 2005-06 2007 2008 20120
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Percen
t
Problems beyond cost allocation• Geographic/product competition
included, then excluded
• Shipper cost of bringing a case– Full SAC: $5.8 million– Simplified SAC: $4 million– 3 Benchmark: $250,000
($4 million cap on rate relief)
mercatus.org
Proposal: Rate benchmarking• Use rates from competitive markets to
estimate how shipment characteristics affect rates
• Use this model to predict rate based on shipment characteristics
• Actual rates exceeding predicted competitive rate by some multiple qualify for arbitration
mercatus.org
Example: Chemicals
mercatus.org
Arbitration• Arbitrator determines market
dominance
• Strict time limit
• No limit on types of evidence
• Final-offer arbitration if market dominance is found
mercatus.org
Mandated switching
mercatus.org
Other issues
• Revenue adequacy
• Service complaints
• Merger approval
• Review of data gathering
mercatus.org
To get the full report …
http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/172736.aspx
mercatus.org