Moderators: Mona Anne Niedbala , University of Rhode Island
description
Transcript of Moderators: Mona Anne Niedbala , University of Rhode Island
ALA Midwinter 2010 Instruction Section Current Issue Discussion What Works? Sharing Best Online Practices for Teaching Information Literacy
Moderators:
Mona Anne Niedbala, University of Rhode IslandLori Mestre, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignLisa A. Baures, Minnesota State University, MankatoVeronica E. Bielat, Wayne State University
Introduction
How to Work with Adobe Connect Pro
(audience responses)
Format of Discussion
Access to Further
Discussion After Today
Overview of Session
Questions
1. What have been some of your challenges for providing online instruction? How did you overcome them?
2. How can the incorporation of Web 2.0 tools promote student engagement when delivering instruction online? What are some of the Web 2.0 tools you use and what have been the results?
3. What are some successful models for collaborating with faculty to develop and design information literacy instruction for the online environment?
4. Can you recommend a practice or learning theory that you use for designing online courses, library learning modules, or learning objects?
5. What are the advantages of correlating student learning outcomes for information literacy to those identified in academic programs, as opposed to embedding or integrating information literacy skills into a course?
What have been some of your challenges for providing online instruction?
1. What have been some of your challenges for providing online instruction?
How did you overcome them?
Learning the
platform and
technologies
Understanding which
technologies to use
Tailoring instruction
to meet individual learning
styles
Providing a collaborative active learning
environment
Evaluation
Time
White Board
1. What have been some of your challenges for providing online instruction? How did you overcome them?
2. How can the incorporation of Web 2.0 tools promote online student engagement?
What are some of the Web 2.0 tools you use and what have been the results?
Promoting Online Student Engagement with Web 2.0 tools
Education 2.o “Thinking Dynamically “Supporting collaboration
The right tool for the right job
Encouraging student participation
Remember the outcomes
Some ideas
•Blogs▫Minute paper idea transported to blogs.
Allows feedback loop after the session is over.
▫Sharing their own knowledge discoveries•Wikis
▫Group authoring▫Ongoing documentation of work
•Social bookmarking▫“on-the-fly” development of annotated
resources
http://uiuc.libguides.com/content.php?pid=64638&sid=512743
http://jwuflorida.libguides.com/content.php?pid=58061&sid=425010
White Board: How can the incorporation of Web 2.0 tools promote student engagement when delivering instruction online? What are some of the Web 2.0 tools you use and what have been the results?
3. What are some successful models for collaborati
ng with faculty to develop
and design
information literacy instruction for the online
environment?
Pre-conditions for Collaboration
•Purpose▫What is the problem?▫When does the problem need to be solved?
•Shared vision and mission▫Is the problem worthy of study?▫How is the problem to be solved?▫Who is best equipped to solve the
problem?
Strategies for Collaboration
•Build from existing working relationships•Alignment of information literacy
standards and discipline/program student learning outcomes▫Nomenclature▫Contextualize▫Discussion of core concepts and
principles•Use of Web 2.0 tools
White Board3. What are some successful models for collaborating with faculty to develop and design information literacy instruction for the online environment?
4. Can you
recommend a
practice or
learning theory
that you use for
designing online
courses, learning modules,
or learning objects?
Scaffolding Theory of Learning
Use of temporary supports, “scaffolds”, to assist learners complete complex tasks independently
Based on Lev Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development Theory
Library Instruction Using Data
Write Synthesize (Samples)
Represent (Suggest data tables)
Locate (Model search)
Interactive scaffolds
Evaluates evaluationPresents synthesisWrites synthesisDocuments outside sources analysis
model use of information (scaffold)Accesses information efficiently application
model research (scaffold)Builds search phrase comprehension
model research question (scaffold)model mind map (scaffold)
Integrating Information Literacy Skills and Course Educational Objectives
White Board 4. Can you recommend a practice or learning theory that you use for designing online courses, library learning modules, or learning objects?
5. What are the
advantages of
correlating student learning outcomes
for information literacy to those
identified in
academic programs,
as opposed
to embeddin
g or integratin
g information literacy skills into a course?
Confluence
Program accreditation
Subject content
Information literacy standards
Library Instruction Continuum/User Perception of Relevancy
Course—demonstrates significance and importance of information literacy
Embedded—demonstrates how information literacy complements course content
Integrated—demonstrates how information literacy relates to course content
Correlated—demonstrates how information literacy is course content
White Board5. What are the advantages of correlating student learning outcomes for information literacy to those identified in academic programs, as opposed to embedding or integrating information literacy skills into a course?
What is one tip you would share for teaching online?
Further Information
1. Bibliography 2. Online Learning Toolkit
http://www.library.illinois.edu/diglit/coop/olrc/index.html3. Learning Objects http://uiuc.libguides.com/learningobjects4. Wiki for further conversations:
http://whatworksonline.pbworks.com/ To add comments you will need to sign in (free and quick registration)
http://whatworksonline.pbworks.com/
Mona Anne Niedbala, University of Rhode Island [email protected]
Lori Mestre, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champlain [email protected]
Lisa A. Baures, Minnesota State University, Mankato [email protected]
Veronica E. Bielat, Wayne State University [email protected]