Jan-Peter Muller and Catherine Naud In collaboration with Eugene Clothiaux (PennState University)
Models of GRB GeV-TeV emission and GLAST/Swift synergy Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China...
-
Upload
christian-paul -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Models of GRB GeV-TeV emission and GLAST/Swift synergy Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China...
Models of GRB GeV-TeV emission and Models of GRB GeV-TeV emission and GLAST/Swift synergyGLAST/Swift synergy
Xiang-Yu WangNanjing University, China
Co-authors: Peter Meszaros (PennState), Zhuo Li (PKU), Hao-ning He (NJU)
TeV Particle Astrophysics IV Sept. 24-28, 2008; Beijing, China
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Outline
GRB high-energy observations Models for GeV-TeV emission from GRBs Swift new discoveries and high-energy predictions with G
LAST
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
I. GRB high-energy observations
GRB930131
GRB940217
EGRET on CGRO 1) Prompt 2) Delayed
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
GRB941017
−18 s – 14 s
14 s – 47 s
47 s – 80 s
80 s – 113 s
113 s – 211 s
High-energy emission lasts longer than KeV-MeV emission
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
A recent burst detected by AGILE GRB080514B
Similar to GRB941017, common phenomena?
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
GCN reports on GLAST Obs.
GRB080825C: LAT detection, photons with energy lower than 1 GeV (GCN No.8183)
GRB080916C : LAT detection, more than 10 photons are observed above 1 GeV (GCN No.8246)
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
E>100GeV: only upper limits
Magic: upper limits for several Swift bursts (Albert et al., 06)
Whipple: upper limits (Horan et al. 07) Milagro: upper limits fro short GRB (Abdo et a
l. 07) ARGO-YBJ array find only upper limits (Di Sc
iascio, et al., 06) HESS: upper limits of GRB060602B (Aharoni
an et al. 08)
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Example: HESS GRB060602B
very soft BAT spectrum and proximity to the Galactic center
More likely to be a Galactic X-ray transient
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
GRB model: Internal and External shocks
Credit P. Meszaros
Rees & Meszaros 92; Meszaros & Rees 1994
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Electrons- Shock acceleration: ~10 TeV
Protons (or nuclei)-1) Shock acceleration (e.g. Waxman 1995; Vietri 1995)
Candidate source of ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs)
2) Neutrinos from photo-meson and pp processes (e.g. Waxman & Bahcall 1997; Bottcher & Dermer 1998)
Particle acceleration in GRB shocks
eV10~ 20
7, 10~ Maxeacccool tt
5, 10 Maxe X-ray afterglows modeling e.g. Li & Waxman 2006
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Two basic processes for high-energy gamma-ray emission1. Leptonic inverse-Compton scattering
2. Hadronic processes: 1)proton synchrotron; 2) p-γneutral pion decay; 3)secondary electrons synchrotron & IC
Prompt phase Internal shock, leptonic: electron synchrotron & SSC Internal shock, hadronic: proton synchrotron & p-γ interaction
Early afterglow phase External, leptonic: forward, reverse and cross shock SSC External, hadronic: proton synchrotron & p-γ interaction
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Efficiency comparison for the two processes (I)
Prompt gamma-ray emission (Gupta & Zhang 2007)
-- Proton syn.-- synchrotron radiation produced by secondary positrons
**high energy emission is dominated by the leptonic component if є_e>0.01**
neutral pion decay
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Efficiency comparison for the two processes (II)-mildly relativistic outflow
Ando & Meszaros 08
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
GRB high energy emission: IC processes
central internal external shocksengine (shocks) (reverse) (forward)
Internal shock IC: e.g. Pilla & Loeb 1998; Razzaque et al. 2004; Gupta & Zhang 2007
External shock IC reverse shock IC: e.g. Meszaros , et al. 94; Wang et al. 01; Granot & Guetta 03
forward shock IC: e.g.Meszaros & Rees 94; Dermer et al. 00; Zhang & Meszaros 01
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Typical energies of SSC emission
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
(1) IC emission from very early external shocks
Shocked shell
Shocked ISM
Cold ISM
Coldshell
pressure
FSRS
CD
1) (rr)2) (ff)3) (fr)4) (rf)
Four IC processes
(Wang, Dai & Lu 2001 ApJ,556, 1010)
At deceleration radius, T_obs~10-100 sForward shock---Reverse shock structure is developed
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Energy spectra---
1
0
max
min
'3 xfxdxgNdrf TIC
;1,5.2,01.0,6.0,10E a) 53 nperg Be
f
At sub-GeV to GeV energies, the SSC of reverse shock is dominant; at higher energies, the Combined IC or SSC of forward shock becomes increasingly dominated
Reverse shock SSC (r,f) IC
(f,r) ICForward shock SSC
Log(E/keV)
GLAST 5 photons sensitivity
(Wang, Dai & Lu 2001 ApJ,556, 1010)
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
One GeV burst with very hard spectrum- leptonic or hadronic process?
−18 s – 14 s
14 s – 47 s
47 s – 80 s
80 s – 113 s
113 s – 211 s
Gonzalez et al. 03: Hadronic model
Leptonic IC model:
Granot & Guetta 03 Pe’er & Waxman 04 Wang X Y et al. 05
GRB941017
Wang X Y et al. 05, A&A, 439,957
Reverse shock SSCISM medium environment
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
(2) afterglow IC emissionZhang & Meszaros 01
May explain delayed GeV emission
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Swift/GLAST synergy
1) X-ray flares 2) early shallow decay 3)low-luminosity GRBs 4)prompt emission
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Swift: A Canonical X-ray Lightcurve(Zhang et al. 2006; Nousek et al. 2006; O’Brien et al. 2006)
~ -3
~ -0.5
~ - 1.2
~ -210^2 – 10^3 s
10^4 – 10^5 s
prompt emission
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
~30%-50% early afterglow have x-ray flares, Swift discovery
Flare light curves: rapid rise and decay
<<1 Afterglow decay consistent with
a single power-law before and after the flare
(1) High-energy photons from X-ray flares
Burrows et al. 2005Falcone et al. 2006
amplitude: ~500 times above the underlying afterglow
GRB050502B
X-ray flares occur inside the decelerationradius of the afterglow shock
X-ray flares: late-time central engine activity
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
IC between X-ray flare photons and afterglow electrons (Wang, Li & Meszaros 2006)
Cnetral engine
X-ray flare photons
Forward shock region
Cartoon
X-ray flare photons illuminate the afterglow shock electrons from inside
also see Fan & Piran 2006: unseen UV photons
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
IC GeV flare fluence-An estimate So most energy of the newly shock electrons will be lost into IC emi
ssion
X-ray flare peak energy
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Temporal behavior of the IC emission Not exactly correlated with the X-ray flare light curves. IC
emission will be lengthened by the afterglow shock angular
spreading time and the anisotropic IC effect
Self-IC of flares, peak at lower energiesWang, Li & Meszaros 2006In external shock model for x-ray flares
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
IC emission from X-ray flares at VHE
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
(2)High-energy emission during shallow decay phase-energy injection model (Fan et al. 2008)
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
(3)High-energy emission from low-luminosity GRBs
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
GRB980425: first low-luminosity GRB identified sub-energetic GRB—GRB980425: E~1e48 erg, at d=38 Mpc Radio afterglow modeling: E>1e49 erg, \Gamma~1-2 X-ray afterglow: E~5e49 erg, \beta=0.8 (Waxman 2004)
Mildly relativistic ejecta component
In the error box of GRB980425
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
GRB060218/SN2006aj –Swift discovery
An unusually long, smooth burst
Low luminosity, low energy
z=0.033, second nearest GRB
Campana et al. 2006
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Thermal x-ray emission from low-luminosity GRBs
SN2006aj/GRB060218
prompt thermal x-ray emission— mildly relativistic SN shock breakout from stellar wind
Campana et al. 06
Waxman, Meszaros, Campana 07
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Three low-luminosity supernova-GRBs
1) Low-luminosity 2) Smooth light curves 3) Spectrum: a simple power-law with a high energy cutoff
So why they are so unusual?
Mildly relativistic hypernova?
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
High-energy emission from mildly-relativistic hypernova ejecta
Ando & Meszaros 08
at deceleration time ~1d
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
High-energy emission from mildly-relativistic hypernova ejecta
He & Wang, in preparation
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Compared with relativistic jet case
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
(4)Prompt multi-band study by Swift/GLAST Swift can detect optical
to KeV-MeV emission GLAST can detected G
eV-TeV emission
One natural scenario: optical from syn,MeV from IC, Y>=10
2nd IC at GeV-TeV?
Naked eye burst GRB080319B
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
IR, opt, UV ~500keV ~500GeV
YL
YH=YL
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Swift/GLAST can distinguish … SSC model or double syn. model for prompt
optical and MeV emission
Xiang-Yu Wang TeVPA08
Summary Leptonic vs. Hadronic
Leptonic component dominate at GeV-TeV for typical parameters Only for very inefficient bursts (may be diagnosed by coordinated GLAST/Swift obs
ervations), would one expects a significant hadronic contribution in the high energy spectrum
Prompt emission: SSC or double synchrotron model fro prompt optical and MeV emission Forward shock SSC would give extended GeV-TeV emission
Fluence peaks at hours GeV-TeV flares will accompany X-ray flares
Broader Delayed in time
Low-luminosity GRB afterglow Detectable at 30MeV-10 GeV at the peak time for e_e>0.1 Can be used to distinguish high \Gamma or low \Gamma with GLAST observations
of the light curves