Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

43
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of Marine, Earth & Atmospheric Sciences North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695 7th Annual CMAS Conference October 6-8, 2008

description

Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture. Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of Marine, Earth & Atmospheric Sciences North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695 7th Annual CMAS Conference October 6-8, 2008. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Page 1: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Modeling of Ammonia and PM2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. HouyouxDepartment of Marine, Earth & Atmospheric SciencesNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleigh, NC 27695

7th Annual CMAS Conference October 6-8, 2008

Page 2: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Outline

٥ Introduction – Ammonia in North Carolina (NC)

٥ Model Configuration

٥ Preliminary Results

٥O3, NH3, PM2.5, NH4+

٥ Conclusions

٥ Future Work

NH3

Page 3: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Why do we care about Ammonia?

Elevated levels of NHx (=NH3 + NH4+) can

lead to:

٥Nitrogen enrichment and eutrophication in aquatic ecosystems

٥ Impacts on crop and forest production

٥Particulate matter (PM) formation

٥Visibility degradation

٥Odor

Page 4: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Nitrogen Emissions in N.C.NH3 Agricultural Sources

Total ~ 40% of Nitrogen

138,843 NH3 tons/yr

• Swine 68,540 (49%)

• Cattle 24,952 (18%)

• Broilers 13,669 (10%)

• Turkeys 16,486 (12%)

• Fertilizer 8,720 (6%)

• Other 6,476 (5%)

(Aneja et al., 1998)

Page 5: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Hog Farms in N.C.

Page 6: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Ammonia Atmospheric Chemistry

Atmospheric Reactions:

٥ NH3(aq) + H20 NH4OH(aq)

٥ NH3(g) + H2SO4(aq) NH4HSO4(aq)

٥ NH3(g) + NH4HSO4(aq) [NH4]2SO4(s or aq)

٥ NH3(g) + HNO3(g) NH4NO3(s or aq)

٥ NH3(g) + HCl(g) NH4Cl(s or aq)

٥ NH3(g) + OH·(g) N·H2(g) + H2O(g)

Page 7: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Model Configuration

٥ Model: Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model

٥ Episode: January 1 – December 31, 2002

٥ Domain: Continental U.S., N. Mexico, S. Canada36 km, 24 layers

٥ Meteorology: MM5 - Pleim-Xiu Land Surface module on

٥ Emissions: 2002 National Emissions Inventory

٥ I/B Conditions: MOZART-2 for lateral BC

٥ Gas-phase mechanism: Carbon Bond (CB05)

٥ Aerosol module: AE4

Page 8: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results Ozone

space

January Base Run – Ozone

Monthly Average

January Reduced Run* – Ozone

Monthly Average

*Reduced Run – NH3 Emissions turned off

ppbv

Page 9: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results Ozone

July Base Run – Ozone

Monthly Average

July Reduced Run* – Ozone

Monthly Average

*Reduced Run – NH3 Emissions turned off

ppbv

Page 10: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results – NH3

January Base Run – NH3

Monthly Average

January Reduced Run* – NH3

Monthly Average

*Reduced Run – NH3 Emissions turned off

ppbv

Page 11: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results – NH3

July Base Run – NH3

Monthly Average

July Reduced Run* – NH3

Monthly Average

*Reduced Run – NH3 Emissions turned off

ppbv

Page 12: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results PM2.5

January Base Run – PM2.5

Monthly Average

January Reduced Run* – PM2.5

Monthly Average

*Reduced Run – NH3 Emissions turned off

Page 13: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results PM2.5

Base Run – January 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 14: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results PM2.5

Reduced Run – January 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 15: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results PM2.5

July Base Run – PM2.5

Monthly Average

July Reduced Run* – PM2.5

Monthly Average

*Reduced Run – NH3 Emissions turned off

Page 16: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results PM2.5

Base Run – July 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 17: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results PM2.5

Reduced Run – July 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 18: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results–NH4+ Aerosol

January Base Run – NH4+

Monthly Average

January Reduced Run – NH4+

Monthly Average

*Reduced Run – NH3 Emissions turned off

Page 19: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results–NH4+ Aerosol

July Base Run – NH4+

Monthly Average

July Reduced Run – NH4+

Monthly Average

*Reduced Run – NH3 Emissions turned off

Page 20: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Conclusions

٥ Agricultural NH3 emissions have a significant impact on PM2.5 and NH4 aerosol predicted concentrations

Page 21: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Future Work

Additional model runs turning off emissions from the various agricultural sectors

Evaluate the effect of ammonia emissions of aerosol composition

Model evaluation using observed values of pollutants

Meteorological analysis

Page 22: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Acknowledgements

٥ USDA

٥ USEPA

٥ NCSU Air Quality Research Group

Page 23: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Atmospheric emissions, transport,transformation & deposition of trace gases

*Indirect deposition is direct deposition to land followed by runoff or seepage through groundwater to a surface water body.

Page 24: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results Ozone

Base Run – January 2002, NC

Monthly Average

ppbv

Page 25: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results Ozone

Reduced Run – January 2002, NC

Monthly Average

ppbv

Page 26: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results Ozone

Difference Between Base Run and Reduced Run

January 2002, NC - Monthly Average

ppbv

Page 27: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results Ozone

Base Run – July 2002, NC

Monthly Average

ppbv

Page 28: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results Ozone

Reduced Run – July 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 29: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results Ozone

Difference Between Base Run and Reduced Run

January 2002, NC - Monthly Average

ppbv

Page 30: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results – NH3

Base Run – January 2002, NC

Monthly Average

ppbv

Page 31: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results – NH3

Reduced Run – January 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 32: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results – NH3

Difference Between Base Run and Reduced Run

January 2002, NC - Monthly Average

ppbv

Page 33: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results – NH3

Base Run – July 2002, NC

Monthly Average

ppbv

Page 34: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results – NH3

Reduced Run – July 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 35: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results – NH3

Difference Between Base Run and Reduced Run

July 2002, NC - Monthly Average

ppbv

Page 36: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results PM2.5

Difference Between Base Run and Reduced Run

January 2002, NC - Monthly Average

Page 37: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results PM2.5

Difference Between Base Run and Reduced Run

July 2002, NC - Monthly Average

Page 38: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results–NH4+ Aerosol

Base Run – January 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 39: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results–NH4+ Aerosol

Reduced Run – January 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 40: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results–NH4+ Aerosol

Difference Between Base Run and Reduced Run

January 2002, NC - Monthly Average

Page 41: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results–NH4+ Aerosol

Base Run – July 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 42: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results–NH4+ Aerosol

Reduced Run – July 2002, NC

Monthly Average

Page 43: Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5  Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture

Preliminary Results–NH4+ Aerosol

Difference Between Base Run and Reduced Run

July 2002, NC - Monthly Average