Modeling and Simulation of the Drug Delivery Function for ...
Transcript of Modeling and Simulation of the Drug Delivery Function for ...
Modeling and Simulation of the Drug Delivery Function
for a Magnetic Driven Capsule Robot
Zixu Wang*1, Shuxiang Guo*2*3 Wei Wei*1 *1Graduate School of Engineering, Kagawa University,
Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0396, Japan
*3Department of Intelligent Mechanical Systems Engineering,
Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0396, Japan
*2Key Laboratory of Convergence Medical Engineering
System and Healthcare Technology, The Ministry of Industry
and Information Technology, School of Life Science and
Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology,
Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract – The capsule robot was developed to detect various
intestinal diseases and mainly used in the minimally invasive
procedures. Among them, commercial capsule robots can already
suit the general inspection requirements. But just having the
inspection function is increasingly unable to keep up with the pace
of the new era, so developers are working hard to integrate some
functional modules into traditional endoscope robots. In this
research, we proposed a new type of robot capable of delivering
drugs in the affected area, and analyze the rationality of structural
design in combination with Ansys Fluent simulation, some
improvements in drug delivery structure will be proposed. Finally,
the experiment will be carried out for motion stability evaluation
of the new type microrobot movement by a custom 6-DOF interial
measurement unit. Through the above methods to improve the
structural design of the robot and finally get a robot with high
performance and stable operation.
Index Terms - Magnetic driven capsule robot, Magnetic
electronic field, Drug delivery.
I. INTRODUCTION
Capsule microrobot is widely used in the modern clinical
medicine fields, such as clinical operation or examination. Due
to the great potential of a micro capsule robot, its mechanism
and motion have developed for decades. Specifically, these
microrobots can be used to remove blood clots or transport
drugs to the desired location of the wound, and even the type of
larger pipe robots can clean pipes under the road. The
development of it is helpful for medical staff to find the exact
position without scar, especially in recent years, with the
development of the hardware and integrated technology, some
of the volume and size limitation problems of capsule robot
have been solved very well. The volume challenges in the
process of robot development are the main problems faced by
researchers. The maximum length is no more than 30mm. These
wireless-capsule microrobots can reach narrow areas such as
blood vessels and small intestine, which is impossible under the
traditional endoscope [1]-[3]. Therefore, the size and volume of
each part of the robot limits the development of functional
modules. In the previous research, various kinds of micro robots
have been put forward before. Propeller or screw propulsion is
a promising new method of laminar motion [4]-[7]. The
electromagnetic module is driven and the robot rotates in the
patient's tissue. Most of these microrobots are controlled by
wireless. The robot has stable motion performance, including
multi-directional motion. Then a hybrid micro robot is
proposed, which can change their motion types according to the
complex environments. Besides, these microrobots also have
some limitations. Most of the microrobots are driven by cables
that are difficult to realize long-distance treatment and
experiment in the human body, which will make patients feel
the discomfort caused by cables. As for the structure design of
wireless micro robots in past research, when patients enter the
human body, they may cause harm to their intestines [8]-[10].
However, due to the limitations of mechanical structure, the
development of functional modules is limited, and these
microrobots cannot achieve multi-function in working time.
Therefore, our research is aimed at the development of active
motion microrobot and keep the safety, which can avoid the risk
factor for capsule retention. So this research will propose a
novel electromagnetic micro robot with space to design the
internal functional modules of the robot, and the protection of
patients' tissues is also one of the main aims of this research.
II. ELECTROMAGNETIC OPERATION SYSTEM
The microrobot driven by the magnetic force is driven by
the electromagnetic field. During previous studies, various
types of electromagnetic drive systems have been proposed to
manipulate magnetic microrobots in human tissues, such as
intestines, blood vessels and stomach. Due to the structure of
the electromagnetic drive system, the application range of
micro robot is limited. Therefore, we propose a new
electromagnetic drive system [11]-[15]. Fig. 1 is the total
electromagnetic drive system. On the operation side, the camera
monitors the visual image in the pipe and displays it on the
monitor. The control command is transmitted to the control unit
through the amplifier, DC power module and control circuit.
After receiving the command, the driving mechanism (three-
axis Helmholtz coil) will generate an external rotating magnetic
field to control various movements of the magnetic controlled
microrobot. Fig.2 shows the monitor can also display the real-
time position of the robot obtained by the magnetically sensor
array. The function of the positioning module is to complete the
closed-loop control and ensure the robot to complete the task.
Therefore, doctors seem to be able to precisely control the
position and posture of wireless micro robots in the human body
[16].
In the detection process, to ensure that the robot moves in
different directions under the same force and magnetic moment,
a controllable magnetic field module needs to be set in the
three-dimensional space. Therefore, we propose to use robot
Three-axis Helmholtz coil as the driving system to drive the
robot. Its function is to provide the rotating power of the
magnetic robot. The structure of the three-axis Helmholtz coil,
there is a pair of coils on each axis, and the center distance of
each pair of coils is represented by L. When L is equal to the
coil radius R, the current in each pair of coils is the same. The
formula for magnetic flux density is shown in equation (1):
𝐵 = ( 4
5 )
3
2𝜇0𝑁𝐼
𝑅 ⑴
where B is the flux density at any point between the coupling
axes of Helmholtz coil, 𝜇0 is the vacuum permeability, R is the
coil radius, n is the number of turns per coil, and I is the coil
current. By operating the control signal of the three-axis
Helmholtz coil, a rotating or fluctuating magnetic field will be
generated to control the permanent magnet inside the micro
robot, so that it can drive in any desired direction [17]-[20].
In the micro robot, there is a permanent cylinder magnet
as the actuator, which is driven by the external magnetic field
in the pipeline. The driving force and magnetic torque are
provided by the external magnetic field. The microrobot can
rotate by force transmission of the magnetic moment T. The
magnetic force F and magnetic torque T acting on the magnet
inside the external magnetic field generated by the three-axis
Helmholtz coils is given by the equations (2) and (3):
𝐹 = 𝑉(𝑀 ∙ 𝛻) × 𝐵 ⑵
𝑇 = 𝑉𝑀 × 𝐵 ⑶
where M is the magnetization of the magnet and V is the volume
of the permanent magnet.
III. Structural DESIGN
The experiments in this paper were carried out in a 20mm
diameter pipe, and the microfluidic conditions were not
considered, so the analysis was performed according to the
macroscopic fluid motion. As shown in Fig.3.
𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑜𝑡 = 1
𝜌𝑔 (𝑃1 − 𝑃2) +
1
2 𝑔𝑣2 (4)
When the microrobot moves in the horizontal direction,
Conservative Bernoulli equation (5) as:
1
2𝜌𝑣2 + 𝜌𝑔ℎ + 𝑝 = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 (5)
where ρ is the density of liquid, v is the velocity of flow, g is gravity acceleration, h is the height of the microrobot, p is the pressure of the liquid. In practice, in addition to the
influence of gravity and fluid pressure, friction and fluid
viscosity will also affect the moving micro robot, resulting in
the loss of mechanical energy. Therefore, the Bernoulli
equation should be changed as equation (6):
𝑊1+𝑃1
𝜌𝑔+
𝑣12
2𝑔 = 𝑊2+
𝑃2
𝜌𝑔+
𝑣22
2𝑔 +𝑊𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟+𝑊𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑜𝑡 (6)
where W is mechanical energy, p is the pressure on each part, v
is the velocity of the inlet and outlet part.
So that the dynamic pressure can be written as the equation
(7):
𝑃𝑑 = 1
2𝐶𝐷 × 𝜌(𝑣𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤
2 − 𝑣𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑜𝑡2) (7)
where 𝐶𝐷 is the drag coefficient, v is the speed on the section
plane of inlet and outlet. Once the capsule robot moves forward.
The drag force increases as the axial velocity increases. So
considering the friction force of the robot moving in the pipe,
the total resistance can be expressed as (8):
𝐹𝑓 = 𝐶𝐷1
2𝜌𝐴𝑣𝑟
2 + 𝜇𝑓(𝑁1 − 𝜌𝑔𝑉𝑟) (8)
where μ𝑓 is the coefficient of friction, N1 is the normal force
between the microrobot and the surface of the pipe which is
equal to gravity, ρ is liquid density, g is gravity acceleration, 𝑉𝑟
is the microrobot volume immersed in the liquid. Then the
Fig. 3 Microrobot in horizontal direction
Fig. 1 The total experimental operation system.
Fig. 2 Electrical magnetic field density of three-axis Helmholtz coils
relationship of propulsive force and total resistance satisfies the
equation (9)
𝐶𝐷1
2𝜌𝐴𝑣2 ≥ 𝐶𝐷
1
2𝜌𝐴𝑣𝑟
2 + 𝜇𝑓(𝑁1 − 𝜌𝑔𝑉𝑟) (9)
When the microrobot moves in a vertical direction (upward
motion), it is mainly affected by three kinds of the resistance
force, pressure drag of liquid, friction caused by contact with
the pipe and gravity.
𝐶𝐷1
2𝜌𝐴𝑣2 + 𝜌𝑔𝑉𝑟 ≥ 𝐶𝐷
1
2𝜌𝐴𝑣𝑟
2 + 𝜇𝑓𝑁2 + 𝐺 (10)
where N2 is the contact normal force between the pipe and the
robot. Meanwhile, the direction of N2 is determined by the
motion direction. Besides, the friction between the robot and
the pipe wall is negligible in the case of smooth operation when
the robot moves in the vertical direction. In this condition, the
propulsive force of the propeller can be calculated according to
the known parameter.
IV. HYDRODYNAMIC SIMULATION
The fluid mechanic’s simulation based on ANSYS can help
us evaluate the parameters of the robot in the flow environment,
and modify the physical model based on the obtained data. In
addition, in order to optimize the dynamic structure of the robot,
considering the different dynamic characteristics of different
actions, a transient model is needed for the simulation of each
detail. A series of vital hydrodynamic parameters of the
motions can be obtained through the analysis of the simulations.
In this article, we will simulate the process of the capsule robot
discharging medicine in still water flow. In this process, we will
consider the fan and the external water flow as a stationary
situation. We set up a cylindrical water tank with a length of
250mm and a radius of 11mm in the fluid domain. The next step
is Boolean subtraction. We will use the water tank for the
Boolean subtraction operation except for the drug cell. Then
select only the model that retains the O-type magnet, in this
way, you can choose to set the O-type magnet as a dynamic
mesh in the subsequent steps to achieve transient simulation.
The next step is to build the mesh, the meshing results of the
geometry model and the flow field are shown in Fig. 5, the total
number of nodes was 12788, and the total number of elements
was 186880. After the whole geometry is meshed, the meshing
results are imported into the establishment step of ANSYS
FLUENT. The calculation model used in this paper is a double
precision k-ε realizable model. In the element region condition
section, we set the rotor as a frame motion rotating around the
y-axis. Then, the boundary of the inlet is the pressure inlet.
Finally, the default divergence coefficient is selected, and the
convergence standard is set to 0.0001. The above three different
settings, due to the convergence requirements, automatically
stop about 80 steps of 20-time steps. After the hydrodynamic
analysis and simulation, in the static flow field, the flow
streamline of the drug flow inside the drug cell is shown in the
Fig. 6 (a), then the with the moving of the O type magnet, the
drug flow transient motion vector can be seen in the Fig. 6 (b)
and Fig. 6 (c) respectively. The structure design can effectively
make the drug flow smoothly through the cell at the rear of the
robot. Combined with the results in the simulation, the
calculated discharge per second is basically consistent with the
experimental data, at 0.02ml/s.
V. EXPERIMENT AND RESULTS
The experiment was carried out to verify the stability of the
movement, we set the electromagnetic field rotating frequency
changed from 1Hz to 10Hz and each step for 10 seconds. As
shown in Fig. 7, the deflection angle of the robot in the forward
direction which was measured in a φ20mm PVC pipe and the
robot was always immersed in water.
When the robot was manipulated at a lower rotational
frequency (1-2 Hz), the resistance was larger than the axial
direction propulsive force. Thus the start frequency of the robot
is 3 Hz, it can be seen in Fig.8, when the robot starts moving at
3 Hz, the static friction becomes dynamic friction. The flutter
of the microrobot is obvious when it overcomes the static
friction and just starts to move forward. After that, the robot has
a relatively stable movement when the frequency at 4-7 Hz.
With the increasing of the frequency, the rotating velocity of
the blades also was increased, and its effect on the balance of
the robot began to emerge. In general, the deflection angle and
stability of the movement during the experiment are
controllable before 11 Hz, which is the step-out frequency of
this type of capsule microrobot.
Fig. 4 Geometry model of the microrobot
Fig. 5 Meshed model of the microrobot with pipe
VI. CONCLUSION
In this paper, we first introduced the operating system and
shown the simulation results of magnetic field density based on
COMSOL software. After that, we systematically introduced
the geometry modelling and related settings in the simulation
process such as the meshing step and how to monitor drag
coefficient changes. A series of parameters such as the drug
discharge speed can be seen in the streamline velocity results,
and then the required parameters such as drug discharge quality
can be calculated in combination with the theoretical formulas
given. Since our simulation is a transient model simulation, the
position of the O-type magnet is different at different times, we
have given the first, 10th step and the last step screenshots of the
results at three different times. Combined with the simulation
results, we can get the effect of the tail hole on the drug
discharge. Finally, we use 6 DOF IMU to evaluate the
movement stability of the robot in the horizontal state and it is
concluded that the robot moves most smoothly at 4-7 Hz. This
also provides valuable basic research for our subsequent
development of robots.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research was supported by National High-Tech.
Research and Development Program of China (No.
2015AA043202), and SPS KAKENHI Grant Number
15K2120.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Guo, T. Fukuda and K. Asaka, “Fish-like underwater microrobot with
3 DOF”, in Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics
and Automation, Vol. 1, pp. 738- 743, 2002. [2] S. Guo, T. Fukuda and K. Asaka, “A new type of fish-like underwater
microrobot”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 8, No. 1,
pp.136-141, 2003. [3] Sehyuk Yim, “Design and Rolling Locomotion of a Magnetically,
Actuated Soft Capsule Endoscope”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol.
28, No.1, pp. 183-194, 2012. [4] Wonseo Lee, Jaekwang Nam, Jongyul Kim, Eunsoo Jung, and Gunhee
Jang, “Effective Locomotion and Precise Unclogging Motion of an Untethered Flexible-Legged Magnetic Robot for Vascular Diseases”,
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 1388-
1397, 2017. [5] Qiang Fu, Shuxiang Guo, “A Control System of the Wireless Microrobots
in Pipe”, in Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on
Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 1995- 2000, 2014.
(a) The first time step of O-type magnet moving towards to the tail
(b) The 10th time step
(c) The last time step
Fig. 6 Simulation result of velocity on different time steps
Fig, 7 Experiment result of motion stability evaluated by 6-DOF IMU
[6] Shuxiang Guo, Qiang Fu, “Characteristic Evaluation of a Wireless
Capsule Microrobotic System”, in Proceedings of 2013 IEEE
International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 831- 836, 2013.
[7] Qiang Fu, Shuxiang Guo, Songyuan Zhang, “Characteristic Evaluation of
a Shrouded Propeller Mechanism for a Magnetic Actuated Microrobot”, Micromachines, Vol. 6, No.9, pp.1272- 1288, 2015.
[8] Qiang Fu, Shuxiang Guo, “Development and Evaluation of Novel
Magnetic Actuated Microrobot with Spiral Motion Using Electromagnetic Actuation System”, Journal of Medical and Biological
Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 506-514, 2016.
[9] Qiang Fu, Shuxiang Guo, Songyuan Zhang, “Performance Evaluation of a Magnetic Microrobot Driven by Rotational Magnetic Field”, in
Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and
Automation, pp.876-880, 2015. [10] Qiang Fu, Shuxiang Guo, “Design and Performance Evaluation of a
Novel Mechanism with Screw Jet Motion for a Hybrid Microrobot Driven
by Rotational Magnetic Field”, in Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp.2376- 2380, 2016.
[11] Arcese, L., Fruchard, M., Ferreira, A, “Adaptive controller and observer
for a magnetic microrobot”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol. 29, No.4, pp. 1060- 1067, 2013.
[12] Peyer, K. E., Zhang, L., Nelson, B. J., “Bio-inspired magnetic swimming
microrobots for biomedical applications”, Nanoscale, Vol.5, No.4, 2013. [13] Kim, S. H., Ishiyama, K., “Magnetic Robot and Manipulation for Active
Locomotion with Targeted Drug Release”, IEEE/ ASME Transactions on
Mechatronics, Vol. 19, No.5, 2014. [14] Shuxiang Guo, Zixu Wang, Qiang Fu, “Motion Performance and
Evaluation of a Magnetic Actuated Screw Jet Microrobot”, in Proceedings
of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 2000-2004, 2017.
[15] Qiang Fu, Shuxiang Guo, Jian Guo, “Conceptual Design of a Novel
Magnetically Actuated Hybrid Microrobot”, in Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp.1001-
1005, 2017.
[16] Shuxiang Guo, Qiuxia Yang, Luchang Bai, Yan Zhao, “Development of Multiple Capsule Robots in Pipe”, Micromachines, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2018.
[17] J. Nam, W. Lee, E. Jung and G. Jang, “Magnetic navigation system
utilizing a closed magnetic circuit to maximize magnetic field and a
mapping method to precisely control magnetic field in real time,” IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 5673-5681, 2018.
[18] Zixu Wang, Shuxiang Guo, Qiang Fu and Jian Guo, “Characteristic
Evaluation of a Magnetic-actuated Microrobot in Pipe with Screw Jet Motion” Microsystem Technologies, Vol.24, No.7, pp.1272-1288, 2018.
[19] Zixu Wang, Shuxiang Guo, Wei Wei, “Characteristic Evaluation of the
Shell Outlet Mechanism for a Magnetic-actuated Screw Jet Microrobot in pipe”, in Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on
Mechatronics and Automation, pp.1688-1692, 2018.
[20] Shuxiang Guo, Qiuxia Yang, Luchang Bai and Yan Zhao, “Magnetic Driven Wireless Multiple Capsule Robots with Different Structures”, in
Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and
Automation, pp. 626-630, 2018. [21] Zixu Wang, Shuxiang Guo and Wei Wei, “Motion Performance of a
Novel Fan Type Magnetic Microrobot in Pipe”, in Proceedings of 2019
IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp.
1409-1413, 2019.
[22] W. Lee, J. Nam, B. Jang and G. Jang, “Selective motion control of a
crawling magnetic robot system for wireless self-expandable stent delivery in narrowed tubular environments,” IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Electronics, Vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 1636-1644, 2017.
[23] B. Jang, J. Nam, W. Lee and G. Jang, “A crawling magnetic robot actuated and steered via oscillatory rotating external magnetic fields in
tubular environments,” IEEE/ ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol.
22, no. 3, pp. 1465-1472, 2017. [24] Zhou. H. and Gursel. A, “A novel magnetic anchoring system for wireless
capsule endoscopes operating within the gastrointestinal tract,”
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1106-1116, 2019.