Model Bank Testing Accelerators

“Ready-to-use” test scenarios to reduce effort, time and money.

Model Bank Testing Accelerators

Model Bank Testing Accelerators Capabilities

Model Bank Testing Accelerators Design

Model Bank Testing Accelerators Coverage

1

2

3

4

5

Model Bank Testing Accelerators Benefits6

Business Challenges

As software vendors offer more flexible solutions to their clients, the need for

complex testing increases. This is further complicated by the need not just to test

applications in isolation but as an integral part of a larger application environment.

Bug fixes, patches, new development and upgrades have to be tested end to end

across all the involved platforms and systems. This process requires good

coordination, tremendous effort, time to execute the test scenarios and large

numbers of resources. All of this adds up when looking at the overall cost of testing.

Therefore the use of ready and properly structured test scenarios not only can

ensure the completeness of test coverage, but also significantly reduce deployment

and testing costs.

Test data

ready for use

with minor

changes for

client specific setup

Definition of financial

objects and mapping to

T24 ready for use

Test cases grouped into logical functions

at a granular level to enable selection of

relevant functions

Financial test cases built to cover all main banking

functions

Utilization of the product features of

re-usability

Reduction in effort in test preparation and quicker times

to delivery

Automated

test result

checks

To ensure completeness of test coverage, test cases have been designed

using the following principles:

Re-usability based on:

Site independence

System Date independence

Currency independence

Exchange and interest rate independence

‘Four Eyes’ principle of input and authorize

Input, Amend, Reverse and Delete

End to End check steps including limit updates, entry and delivery

message generation, General Ledger updates

Verification of SWIFT message output

Checks of interest calculations and currency conversions

Multiple users

Automatic triggered of COB and confirmation of successful completion

These test cases provide wide

coverage of the functional areas

of TEMENOS T24 Model Bank:

Core

Trade Finance and Guarantees

Arrangement Architecture

Wealth Management

SWIFT

Reporting / Accounting

We also provide coverage for

Canadian Platform Scenarios

Core 1650

In depth cover Bank specific products and

processes

Meet testing needs to cover local development

Reduce the effort and cost of testing by 60-

70% against testing on a manual basis

Increase reusability with available test

cases

Test cases, easy to use for testing through Web, GUI or OFS

Especially designed execution cycles to meet the needs of each bank, covering daily, monthly and quarterly

processing cycles

Test cases based on business workflows and

business scenarios

Manual Functional Testing

Systems Integration

Testing

Continuous Regression

Testing

Performance Testing

30% Faster on test case

creation60% Faster

than manual

-40% Due to Test data and

scenarios reusability

70% less effort by reusing the test artifacts

from SIT

60% less effort by reusing the test artifacts

from SIT

LimitationsNo Low level testing.Lack of Knowledge and Complex test transactions and enquiries.No qualitative test cases.No reusability

With AcceleratorsHighest Automation Required:EnquiresAdvanced EnquiriesTest DataAutomatic Business RulesComparison Rules

Highest Automation Required:EnquiresAdvanced EnquiriesComparison RulesAutomatic Business Rules

Highest Automation Required:Automatic Business Rules

Manual Functional Testing

Systems Integration

Testing

Continuous Regression

Testing

Performance Testing

70% Faster in any cycle

60% Faster on every cycle

80% Faster on every cycle

No comparison to manual as it is only automatic

Same Effort for all Cycles

Cycle 1Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Cycle 4

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Cycle 4Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Automation – RUN 1

Infrastructure

On boarding

Test Case Creation

Automation Design

Run MTC% Reusability

Automation - RUN 2

Infrastructure

Test Case Creation

Automation Design

Run MTC

% Reusability

Automation – RUN 3

Infrastructure

Test Case CreationAutomation DesignRun MTC

% Reusability

COST $$

COST

$$

COST

$$

We would be happy to help.

Do You Have Any Questions?