SummerSchool.ppt [Mode de compatibilité] Summer School... · 2007. 9. 10. · Title: Microsoft...
Transcript of SummerSchool.ppt [Mode de compatibilité] Summer School... · 2007. 9. 10. · Title: Microsoft...
10/09/2007
1
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
2
« Perform 3D actions in a 3D space on a 3D Object: a human being »Introduction
Basics
History
Therapeutic objects = Targets
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion Therapeutic objects Targets
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
3
Frame based Stereotaxy : Clarke et Horsley - 1806
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Introduction
Basics
History
Pedicular screwingTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
4
First generation : ROBODOC and CASPAR
Introduction
Basics
History
First generation : ROBODOC and CASPAR
Femoral drilling
Out of business
Cost
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
ConclusionCost
Invasiveness
No added value
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
6223
10/09/2007
5
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
The Perception – Decision – Action loop
PRE-OPIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
PER-OP
10/09/2007
6
PASSIVE SYSTEMSNavigation systems
Introduction
Basics
History
Guiding systems
Navigation systems
3D localizers
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Real-time feed back on the location of :
-Therapeutic objects
- Surgical instruments
SEMI-ACTIVE SYSTEMSThe surgeon is guided in a
Introduction
Basics
History
The surgeon is guided in a restricted volume
Padyc
Guiding systems
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Synergistic robots
Collaborative robots
Impeachment robots
http://www-timc.imag.fr/
10/09/2007
7
ACTIVE SYSTEMSActive robots which performs
Introduction
Basics
History
Active robots which performsPart of the surgical procedure
Active robots
Guiding systems
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Perform parts of the procedure
Based on per-op planning
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
8
Introduction
Basics
History
3D Localizers
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Localization : non deformable Objects
• Bones or surgical tools
Introduction
Basics
History
Bones or surgical tools•Location•Orientation
Refrb
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Ref.abscamera 3D rotation matrix and the translation
matrix to compute the transformation from Refabs to Refrb
rb
10/09/2007
9
Non deformable Objects
Bony structures : therapeutic objects
Introduction
Basics
History
• Dynamic reference base(DRB)
•Bony structures : therapeutic objects
•Surgical toolsTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
DRB attached to :
Non deformable Objects
• Dynamic reference base(DRB)Introduction
Basics
History
•DRB attached to :
•Bony structures : therapeutic objects
•Surgical tools
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
10
Optical localizer with two 2 Dimensional sensors
Localizer = 1 Source + 1 Sensor
Introduction
Basics
History
Line of sight
DRB
•Optical localizer with two 2 Dimensional sensors TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Polaris :
Localizer = 1 Source + 1 Sensor
Introduction
Basics
History
•Polaris :TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
11
Infra red sensors
Optical systems
Introduction
Basics
History
•Infra-red sensors
Basics
Emitted by the DRB
Reflected by the DRB
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Wave length 880 nm
In the OR one can find70 000 Lux 400 et 500 nm
Active systems
Optical systems
Introduction
Basics
History
•Active systems
DrawbacksCables on the operating field
Batteries
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Active emission of light= source of energy Weight
Sterilization issues
10/09/2007
12
Passive systemDrawbacks
Si l
Optical systems
Introduction
Basics
History
•Passive system Single use
Sensitive to surrounding light
Passive = reflectorsTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
ProsCheap
Light
Can be set on any type of instrument
Vision of the camera
Optical systems
Introduction
Basics
History
•Vision of the camera
Vision of the optical system
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Surgical scene
10/09/2007
13
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
40 000 TKA / Year / France
8 000 Uni / Year / France
• The challenges : two faces
Introduction
Basics
History
•Geometric challenge•Align the implants with respect to mechanical axes
•Functional challenge•Perform a good ligament balance
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•Enough mobility
•Enough stability
10/09/2007
14
•Mechanical axes :
• The challenges : two faces
Introduction
Basics
History
•Mechanical axes :TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
7°
• The challenges : two faces
Introduction
Basics
History
•Geometric challenge•Align the implants with respect to mechanical axes
•Functional challenge•Perform a good ligament balance
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•Enough mobility
•Enough stability
10/09/2007
15
• Functional challenge
•Ligament balancing
Introduction
Basics
History
•Ligament balancingTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
• Functional challenge
•Ligament balancing
Introduction
Basics
History
•Ligament balancingTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•Lift-off = wear •Instability
10/09/2007
16
• Functional challenge
•Ligament balancing
• Well align knee (HKA ~ 180°): Good cuts• Well align knee (HKA ~ 180 ): Good cuts
• Functional challenge
•Ligament balancing
• Well align knee (HKA ~ 180°): Excessive cuts
• Gap
• Well align knee (HKA ~ 180 ): Excessive cuts
p
10/09/2007
17
• Functional challenge
•Ligament balancing
• Well align knee (HKA ~ 180°): Excessive cuts
• Gap
• Well align knee (HKA ~ 180 ): Excessive cuts
p
• Laxity in extension
• Increase PE.
• Functional challenge
•Ligament balancing
• Well align knee (HKA ~ 180°): Insufficient cuts• Well align knee (HKA ~ 180 ): Insufficient cuts
10/09/2007
18
• Functional challenge
•Ligament balancing
• Well align knee (HKA ~ 180°): Insufficient cuts• Well align knee (HKA ~ 180 ): Insufficient cuts
• Excessive constraint
• Functional challenge
•Ligament balancing
• Misalignment (Varus or Valgus):
• Distraction
g ( g )
• Retraction• Laxity
• Constraint
10/09/2007
19
• Functional challenge
•Ligament balancing
• Misalignment (Varus or Valgus):• Misalignment (Varus or Valgus):
• Retraction• Release
• Functional challenge
•Ligament balancing
• Misalignment (Varus or Valgus):
• Risks•Unbalance knee•Residual laxity / Excessive constraints•Overcorrection / Hypocorrection
• Misalignment (Varus or Valgus):
10/09/2007
20
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
The solutions
Build a SPECIFIC model of the patient under surgery
•Build the specific GEOMETRY of this patient
Introduction
Basics
History
•Build the specific GEOMETRY of this patient•Align the prosthesis with respect to the patient axes
•Hip center
•Knee center
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•Ankle center
•Localize in 3D the joint centers•Build reference planes
10/09/2007
21
Build a SPECIFIC model of the patient under surgery
•Build the specific MORPHOLOGY of this patient
Introduction
Basics
History
•Build the specific MORPHOLOGY of this patient
Local adjustment to the bonesLigament balance can only be made with local data
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Pros and Cons
•CT based approach
Introduction
Basics
History
CT based approach •Pre-operative planning•Cost – Radio protection issues•Archiving and communication of images : PACS•No increasing time for acquisition and planning
•CT including Hip – Knee - Ankle•Setup time•Intra-operative registration (time consuming/accuracy issues)
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Registration
10/09/2007
22
•Non image based systemPros and Cons
Introduction
Basics
History
g y
•Simple•Low cost – No radiation•Integration of intra-operative data•No registration issue
•Increase the operative time
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
23
•No pre-operative images
B ild ifi d l f th ti t A i iti
Introduction
Basics
History
•Build a specific model of the patient : Acquisition
•Geometric data•Axes
•Hip center•Knee center•Ankle center
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•Morphologic data•Bone surfaces
•Digitization of points with a 3D probe
•None image based approach
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
24
•None image based approach
Kinematics approach
Introduction
Basics
History
Rpolaris
Ta1
Tb1Tc1
•Search of a point C of Rfem with the minimum trajectory during the acquisiton motion
-Kinematics approachTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Hip Center
Rfemur
Tc1
Td1
Ta0
Tb0Tc0 Td0
•None image based approach
Morphologic approach
Introduction
Basics
History
Rpolaris
-Morphologic approachTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
25
•Percutaneous digitization of points
•None image based approach
Geometric approach
Introduction
Basics
History
•Percutaneous digitization of points -Geometric approachTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•None image based approach
Geometric approach
Introduction
Basics
History
•Error
•Slope
•Varus
-Geometric approachTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•Valgus
10/09/2007
26
-Geometric approach
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
E. STINDEL, et Al., The center of the ankle in ct less based navigation system.
What is really important to detect? CAOS Santa fee 19-22 Juin 2002.
•None image based approach
Introduction
Basics
History
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6SsMI – SsME – Consequences on the slopeError in °
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
-0,2
-0,1
0
0,1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Patient
10/09/2007
27
•Femoral and tibial shape : Bone morphing
U f t ti ti l d f bl d l
Introduction
Basics
History
•Use of statistical deformable modelsTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
A i iti D f ti Q lit t l
•Femoral shape : Bone morphing
Introduction
Basics
History
•Acquisition – Deformation – Quality controlTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
28
d ( llé ) h h l d f h
•Femoral shape : Bone morphing
Introduction
Basics
History
•Quadtree (Lavallée) : hierarchical division of the 3D volume to apply global and local deformationTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
29
•Level 1 : based on morphologic data
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•Level 2 : based on dynamic per-operative dataSensor
Introduction
Basics
History
Spacer
Software
• Alignment
• Quantitative data on GAPS
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusiondata on GAPS
10/09/2007
30
•Level 2 : based on dynamic per-operative data
Introduction
Basics
History
• Test residual laxity•Varus Max.•Valgus Max.
• If the residual laxity is over a threshold
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•Level 2 : based on dynamic per-operative data
• Loop until the threshold is reached
Introduction
Basics
History
p
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
31
•Level 2 : based on dynamic per-operative data
• Loop until the threshold is reached
Introduction
Basics
History
p
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
• Courtesy of Christophe Marmignon and Philippe Cinquin – TIMC - Grenoble
•Level 3 : Integration of quality control in the decision loop
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
32
•Femoral planning
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
33
Active system : robotsIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Passive system : navigation
•Freehand
•Tools are localized in the 3D space in real time with respect to the bones
•Robotized cutting guides
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
34
•Robotized milling guides
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
35
Navigation of cutting guidesIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Navigation of cutting guidesIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
36
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
7 000 cases / Year / France
•Integration of bricksIntroduction
Basics
History
-Hip center : Same brick
-Knee center : Specific solution
-Ankle center : Same brick
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
-3D Planning
Computer Assisted Surgical Protocol - CASP
10/09/2007
37
•Knee center
-No access to the joint-Mixed approach-Man / Machine synergy
Introduction
Basics
History
Man / Machine synergy
SOMMER, H.J., Determination of first and second order instant screw parameters from landmark trajectories.
Mechanical Design, 1990: p. 141-142.
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•Knee center
-No access to the joint-Mixed approach-Man / Machine synergy
Introduction
Basics
History
y gy
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Expert steering
10/09/2007
38
•In the ORIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
39
•Anterior Cruciate Ligament Replacement
•The challenges
I t
Introduction
Basics
History
•Isometry
•Avoid impingementTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•Planning
• Projection of the tibial point / Femoral notch projection• Compute the anisometry map
Introduction
Basics
History
•Anterior Cruciate Ligament Replacement
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
•For a specific tibial point choose the best location of the femoral point
10/09/2007
40
•Action
•Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReplacementIntroduction
Basics
History
• Take the usual guide
• Attache a rigid body
•Perform the calibration
• Drill the tunnels with the
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion• Drill the tunnels with the help of the GUI
•Impingement
•Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReplacementIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
• Digitized the anterior fiber of the graft
10/09/2007
41
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
100 000 cases / Year / France
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
42
Length -
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Length +
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
43
Offset
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Offset +
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
44
Offset -
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
-Length -Centre of rotation-Offset -Stability
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
• Anteversion of the cupTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
45
•Total Hip Arthroplasty
-Reference planeIntroduction
Basics
History
• Not an absolute reference
• Can be define on an X-Ray
•Change in supine position
•Influence anteversion values
α
Vert
ical
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusionα
-Reference plane
•Total Hip Arthroplasty
35
Introduction
Basics
History
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
-50 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5
10/09/2007
46
•View of the acetabulum fossa before reaming
-Local bone morphing instead of global
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
FossaTKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
-Local bone morphing instead of global
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
47
-Local bone morphing instead of global
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
• Final hip center location
-Fine tunning of the implants
•Total Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
48
•Total Hip Arthroplasty
-Fine tunning of the implantsIntroduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
Introduction
Basics
History
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion
10/09/2007
49
Introduction
Basics
History
Blind surgery or quantitative surgery ?
TKA
HTO
THA
ACL
Conclusion