Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size

download Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size

of 3

Transcript of Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size

  • 7/21/2019 Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size

    1/3

    1

    Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Sandwich Panel by VaryingCell Size

    Amey GongleBE (Mechanical)

    G H R C O E M

    Ahmednagar

    [email protected]

    Prateek GaikwadBE (Mechanical)

    G H R C O E M

    Ahmednagar

    [email protected]

    ABSTRACT

    The purpose of this paper is to find out the effect of the cell

    size on basic natural frequency of the Aluminium honeycomb

    sandwich panels with the help of software package and by

    finite element methodology. Modal Analysis was conducted

    on hexangular honeycomb structure of cell sizes of six, nine

    and twelve millimeter by keeping face sheet thickness

    constant of one millimeter. Each model is analyzed

    underneath a similar loading and boundary conditions. Modal

    analysis of the all models is performed on ANSYS and the

    results are compared.

    .

    General Terms:

    Sandwich structure,

    Keywords:

    Cell size, Honeycomb Structure, Sandwich

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Honeycomb sandwich panels are finding its use in many fieldssuch as thermal and structural applications. These panels areextensively used in structural applications due to theirproperties such as high strength to weight ratio, high energyabsorbing capacity, bending stiffness etc. Due to suchproperties honeycomb panels are used for design andconstruction of lightweight transportation systems such assatellites, aircrafts, rocket fins, high speed trains, fast ferrieswhere structural weight reduction is of prime importance.

    Fig. 1:Construction of honeycomb panel

    Construction of a honeycomb sandwich structure consists oftwo high strength face sheets which are separated bylightweight core as shown in fig. 1. Materials extensively used

    for manufacturing of honeycomb panels are aluminium alloys,high tensile steels, titanium and composites which are chosenaccording to purpose.

    While development of an honeycomb structure, scaling ofhoneycomb properties with respect to its cell size in veryimportant. Variation in cell size has significant impact on variousproperties of the panel. In current paper, we have studiedaluminium alloy panel with 3 different cell sizes 6, 9, and 12 mmto understand the effect of cell size on the their fundamentalfrequencies.

    Fig. 2:Nomenclature of an hexagonal honeycomb cell

    Where, l: Length of the side of hexagonal coret: Face sheet thicknessdc: cell size

    2. Methodology

    Aluminium honeycomb sandwich panel (Al 3003 H19) wasused for the study purpose. Table 1 shows the elastic

    properties of the used aluminium.

    Table 1: Properties of Aluminium:

    Material

    YoungsModulus

    Ef(MPa)

    ShearModulus

    Gf(MPa)

    Density1

    (kg/m3)

    Poissonsratio

    Aluminium 69500 25000 2700 0.33

    Honeycomb sandwich panel has homogenous isotropicproperties. For analytical calculations Equivalent Rigidity Theory

    was used. Formula used for calculations are as follows:

    Eq. thickness= teq= (3hc2+ 6 hc tf + 4 tf2)0.5

  • 7/21/2019 Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size

    2/3

    2

    Eq. Youngs modulus= Eeq= (2tf/ teq)* Ef

    Eq. Modulus of rigidity= Geq= (2tf/ teq)* Gf

    Eq. Density= eq= [2 1tf+ 2 2(H-tf)] / teq

    Where,

    hc= Height of the core

    tf= Face sheet thickness

    2= Density of the core

    H= (Total height of panel) / 2

    For the analysis purpose 3 models were used with 3different cell sizes of 6, 9 & 12 mm by keeping the face sheetthickness (tf) 1 mm constant and the core height (hc) of thepanel is 18 mm which Is also kept constant. Specimenconsidered for the study purpose is an equivalent plate of

    dimensions 500 mm * 500 mm considering it simplysupported beam. In ANSYS software modal analysis ofequivalent plates was done by applying frequency in therange of 0-10000 Hz.

    3. Result:

    Analysis was done on the equivalent plate. 3d

    model of the sandwich plate is shown in fig. 3.

    Equivalent elastic properties of the sandwich panels

    with different core cell sizes are shown in table 2.

    Table 2: Eq. Elastic properties of sandwich panel

    with different core cell sizes:

    CoreCellSize

    teq

    mm

    Eeq

    MPa

    Geq

    MPa

    eq

    Kg/mm3

    6

    32.92 4222.35 164.03

    200.96

    0.339 194.65

    12 186.99

    Following data were obtained after performing analysis ofequivalent plate:

    Sr.

    No.

    Cell Size

    (mm)

    Minimum

    Frequency (Hz)

    Maximum

    Frequency (Hz)

    1. 6 629.5 2140.5

    2. 9 653.78 2223.1

    3. 12 667.1 2268.1

    It can be observed that the cell size of a honeycomb sandwich

    panel has a significant impact on its natural frequency. With an

    increase in cell size of the honeycomb structure, its natural

    frequency also increases. Figures 4-6 show the elementalanalysis results.

    Fig 3: A 3D model of the equivalent plate

    Fig. 4: Mode shape for Eq. plate with cell size 6 mm

    Fig. 5: Mode shape for Eq. plate with cell size 9 mm

  • 7/21/2019 Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size

    3/3

    3

    Fig. 6: Mode shape for Eq. plate with cell size 12 mm

    4. Conclusion

    The fundamental frequency ranges for a simply supported

    aluminium honeycomb sandwich plate of 3 different cell sizeshave been determined by performing modal analysis. The

    results have shown that with an increase in the cell size, the

    corresponding maximum frequency also increases.

    5. Acknowledgement

    We would like to express our heartfelt thanks to our guide Mr.

    Pradip Lande for his appropriate guidance and encouragement,

    especially through difficult times. His suggestions have

    broadened our vision and have guided us to succeed in our

    research. We are also grateful for his critique and guidance

    during the designing part of our paper and we have learntmany things under his leadership.

    We would like to express our appreciation for the wonderful

    experience while completions of this paper work.

    6. References

    [1] Somashekhar G. Ganiger, Impact Analysis of

    Composite Sandwich Structure Bumper Beam for

    Passenger Vehicles

    [2] S Prabhakaran, K. Chinnarasu, M. Senthil Kumar

    Design and Fabrication of Composite Bumper for Light

    Passenger Vehicles, International Journal of Modern

    Engineering Research (IJMER) Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug.

    2012

    [3] Mr. Nitin S. Motgi, Prof. S. B. Naik, Prof.P.R.Kulkarni,

    Impact Analysis of Front Bumper, International

    Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)

    Volume 6 Number 5- Dec 2013

    [4] Jeom Kee Paik, Anil K. Thayamballi, Gyu Sung Kim, The

    strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb

    sandwich panels, Department of Naval Architectureand Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University,

    Pusan 609-735, South Korea

    [5] Sourabha S. Havaldar, Ramesh S. Sharma, Arul Prakash

    M. D. Antony, Mohan Bangaru, Effect of Cell Size on the

    Fundamental Natural Frequency of FRP Honeycomb

    Sandwich Panels, Journal of Minerals and Materials

    Characterization and Engineering, 2012, 11, 653-660