Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size
-
Upload
prateekg92 -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size
-
7/21/2019 Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size
1/3
1
Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Sandwich Panel by VaryingCell Size
Amey GongleBE (Mechanical)
G H R C O E M
Ahmednagar
Prateek GaikwadBE (Mechanical)
G H R C O E M
Ahmednagar
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this paper is to find out the effect of the cell
size on basic natural frequency of the Aluminium honeycomb
sandwich panels with the help of software package and by
finite element methodology. Modal Analysis was conducted
on hexangular honeycomb structure of cell sizes of six, nine
and twelve millimeter by keeping face sheet thickness
constant of one millimeter. Each model is analyzed
underneath a similar loading and boundary conditions. Modal
analysis of the all models is performed on ANSYS and the
results are compared.
.
General Terms:
Sandwich structure,
Keywords:
Cell size, Honeycomb Structure, Sandwich
1. INTRODUCTION
Honeycomb sandwich panels are finding its use in many fieldssuch as thermal and structural applications. These panels areextensively used in structural applications due to theirproperties such as high strength to weight ratio, high energyabsorbing capacity, bending stiffness etc. Due to suchproperties honeycomb panels are used for design andconstruction of lightweight transportation systems such assatellites, aircrafts, rocket fins, high speed trains, fast ferrieswhere structural weight reduction is of prime importance.
Fig. 1:Construction of honeycomb panel
Construction of a honeycomb sandwich structure consists oftwo high strength face sheets which are separated bylightweight core as shown in fig. 1. Materials extensively used
for manufacturing of honeycomb panels are aluminium alloys,high tensile steels, titanium and composites which are chosenaccording to purpose.
While development of an honeycomb structure, scaling ofhoneycomb properties with respect to its cell size in veryimportant. Variation in cell size has significant impact on variousproperties of the panel. In current paper, we have studiedaluminium alloy panel with 3 different cell sizes 6, 9, and 12 mmto understand the effect of cell size on the their fundamentalfrequencies.
Fig. 2:Nomenclature of an hexagonal honeycomb cell
Where, l: Length of the side of hexagonal coret: Face sheet thicknessdc: cell size
2. Methodology
Aluminium honeycomb sandwich panel (Al 3003 H19) wasused for the study purpose. Table 1 shows the elastic
properties of the used aluminium.
Table 1: Properties of Aluminium:
Material
YoungsModulus
Ef(MPa)
ShearModulus
Gf(MPa)
Density1
(kg/m3)
Poissonsratio
Aluminium 69500 25000 2700 0.33
Honeycomb sandwich panel has homogenous isotropicproperties. For analytical calculations Equivalent Rigidity Theory
was used. Formula used for calculations are as follows:
Eq. thickness= teq= (3hc2+ 6 hc tf + 4 tf2)0.5
-
7/21/2019 Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size
2/3
2
Eq. Youngs modulus= Eeq= (2tf/ teq)* Ef
Eq. Modulus of rigidity= Geq= (2tf/ teq)* Gf
Eq. Density= eq= [2 1tf+ 2 2(H-tf)] / teq
Where,
hc= Height of the core
tf= Face sheet thickness
2= Density of the core
H= (Total height of panel) / 2
For the analysis purpose 3 models were used with 3different cell sizes of 6, 9 & 12 mm by keeping the face sheetthickness (tf) 1 mm constant and the core height (hc) of thepanel is 18 mm which Is also kept constant. Specimenconsidered for the study purpose is an equivalent plate of
dimensions 500 mm * 500 mm considering it simplysupported beam. In ANSYS software modal analysis ofequivalent plates was done by applying frequency in therange of 0-10000 Hz.
3. Result:
Analysis was done on the equivalent plate. 3d
model of the sandwich plate is shown in fig. 3.
Equivalent elastic properties of the sandwich panels
with different core cell sizes are shown in table 2.
Table 2: Eq. Elastic properties of sandwich panel
with different core cell sizes:
CoreCellSize
teq
mm
Eeq
MPa
Geq
MPa
eq
Kg/mm3
6
32.92 4222.35 164.03
200.96
0.339 194.65
12 186.99
Following data were obtained after performing analysis ofequivalent plate:
Sr.
No.
Cell Size
(mm)
Minimum
Frequency (Hz)
Maximum
Frequency (Hz)
1. 6 629.5 2140.5
2. 9 653.78 2223.1
3. 12 667.1 2268.1
It can be observed that the cell size of a honeycomb sandwich
panel has a significant impact on its natural frequency. With an
increase in cell size of the honeycomb structure, its natural
frequency also increases. Figures 4-6 show the elementalanalysis results.
Fig 3: A 3D model of the equivalent plate
Fig. 4: Mode shape for Eq. plate with cell size 6 mm
Fig. 5: Mode shape for Eq. plate with cell size 9 mm
-
7/21/2019 Modal Analysis of Honeycomb Structure With Variation of Cell Size
3/3
3
Fig. 6: Mode shape for Eq. plate with cell size 12 mm
4. Conclusion
The fundamental frequency ranges for a simply supported
aluminium honeycomb sandwich plate of 3 different cell sizeshave been determined by performing modal analysis. The
results have shown that with an increase in the cell size, the
corresponding maximum frequency also increases.
5. Acknowledgement
We would like to express our heartfelt thanks to our guide Mr.
Pradip Lande for his appropriate guidance and encouragement,
especially through difficult times. His suggestions have
broadened our vision and have guided us to succeed in our
research. We are also grateful for his critique and guidance
during the designing part of our paper and we have learntmany things under his leadership.
We would like to express our appreciation for the wonderful
experience while completions of this paper work.
6. References
[1] Somashekhar G. Ganiger, Impact Analysis of
Composite Sandwich Structure Bumper Beam for
Passenger Vehicles
[2] S Prabhakaran, K. Chinnarasu, M. Senthil Kumar
Design and Fabrication of Composite Bumper for Light
Passenger Vehicles, International Journal of Modern
Engineering Research (IJMER) Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug.
2012
[3] Mr. Nitin S. Motgi, Prof. S. B. Naik, Prof.P.R.Kulkarni,
Impact Analysis of Front Bumper, International
Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)
Volume 6 Number 5- Dec 2013
[4] Jeom Kee Paik, Anil K. Thayamballi, Gyu Sung Kim, The
strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb
sandwich panels, Department of Naval Architectureand Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University,
Pusan 609-735, South Korea
[5] Sourabha S. Havaldar, Ramesh S. Sharma, Arul Prakash
M. D. Antony, Mohan Bangaru, Effect of Cell Size on the
Fundamental Natural Frequency of FRP Honeycomb
Sandwich Panels, Journal of Minerals and Materials
Characterization and Engineering, 2012, 11, 653-660