Mobility of public and private sector workers · Explanations for declining levels of within sector...
Transcript of Mobility of public and private sector workers · Explanations for declining levels of within sector...
Mobility of public and private sector workers
Jonathan Cribb
OME Reward in the Public Sector: Research Seminar
Friday 10th July 2015
For more details see:
Cribb and Sibieta (2015) ‘Mobility of public and private sector workers’
(http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/7775)
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
General government employment since 2004-05
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
Ge
ne
ral
go
ve
rnm
en
t e
mp
loy
me
nt
(h
ea
dco
un
t)
General government employment
OBR forecast
Forecast incorporating 1% pay awards from 2016-17
Source: IFS calculations using ONS Public Sector Employment Statistics
Notes: Each financial year refers to the final quarter of each year. Excludes
reclassification of workers in English Further Education and Sixth Form Colleges.
Projections are based on OBR forecasts from July 2015. The second projection
adjusts OBR forecasts for the announcement of 1% pay awards from 2016–17 to
2019–20.
Private and public sector employment
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
22.5
23.0
23.5
24.0
24.5
25.0
25.5
Pu
bli
c s
ecto
r e
mp
loy
me
nt
(mil
lio
n)
Pri
va
te s
ecto
r e
mp
loy
me
nt
(mil
lio
n)
Private sector employment (LH axis)
Public sector employment (RH axis)
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
Source: IFS calculations using ONS Public Sector Employment Statistics
Notes: Excludes the effects of reclassification of workers in English Further
Education and Sixth Form Colleges and of privatisations and nationalisations
of financial corporations and Royal Mail
How have public workforce cuts been delivered?
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
• Two main ways a government can cut the public workforce
1. Reduce inflows (e.g. recruitment freeze)
• Reduced inflow of former private sector workers
• Reduced inflow of workers from non-employment
2. Increase outflows (e.g. redundancies)
• Increase number of public sector workers moving to private sector
• Movements of former public sector workers into non-employment
• Welfare consequences will in large part depend on importance of movements between sectors vs net movements into non-employment
• Movements between sectors easier if skills are transferable
• Easier and more likely for younger workers
• Mobility less likely for sector-specific occupations
Our contribution
• Show overall levels of mobility between sectors over time
• Decompose public workforce cuts into contribution from:
– Reduced inflows from private sector
– Increase outflows to private sector
– Net outflows to non-employment
• Examine wider levels of mobility to provide context on level of fluidity and flexibility across public and private sector labour markets
– Levels of mobility within sectors
– Levels of geographical mobility
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
Calculating movements between sectors
• Focus on Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (Panel Dataset) as it allows us to follow a 1% sample of employees
• Take sector in a given year a base year
• Ideal approach would classify sector moves as those observed in a different sector as compared with previous year
• BUT...large number of individuals have missing data in some years
– Could reflect unemployment, low hours, retirement or missing data
• We classify movements between sectors as those:
– In a different sector as compared with the last year (if observed)
– Or, in a different sector as compared with two years ago (if last year’s observation is missing)
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
Increase in movement of public sector workers to private sector since 2010
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f se
cto
r
Public to private - men Private to public - men
Public to private - women Private to public - women
Source: IFS calculations using ASHE Panel Dataset
Sectoral mobility at its highest for younger ages
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f se
cto
r
Age
Public to private - men Private to public - men
Public to private - women Private to public - women
Source: IFS calculations using ASHE Panel Dataset
Notes: Results are pooled across all years from 2000 onwards.
Decomposing public workforce cuts
Change in public sector workforce = Inflow from private sector + Outflow to private sector + Net inflow from non-employment
• Change in public sector workforce measured in public sector employment statistics
• Inflow and outflows to private sector measured in ASHE
• Net inflow from non-employment represents a residual
Caveats
• Net inflow from non-employment includes both effect of reduced inflows (e.g. Recruitment freezes) and outflows (e.g. Redundancies)
• Non-employment includes self-employment here
• Employment only measured in April; misses movements into non-employment between April each year
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
Decomposing changes in the public workforce
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
pu
bli
c e
mp
loy
me
nt
in
pre
vio
us
ye
ar
Outflow to private sector Inflow from private sector
Net inflow from non-employment Total change in public sector employment
Note: Each year refers to the change in employment between Q2 of the named year and Q2 of
the previous year. Public sector employment is adjusted for reclassifications
Source: Authors’ calculations using the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings and ONS Public
Sector Employment Statistics.
Change in public employment since 2010Q1
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
He
ad
co
un
t in
de
xe
d t
o 1
00
in
20
10
Q1
Education
NHS
Public admin
HM Forces
Police (incl civilians)
Other Health and Social Care
Other Gen Govt
Source: IFS calculations using ONS Public Sector Employment Statistics
Notes: Excludes reclassification of workers in English Further Education and
Sixth Form Colleges. Changes in employment in public corporations not shown
Decomposing changes by area of employment
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
Source: Authors’ calculations using the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings and ONS Public Sector Employment
Statistics.
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
2007–10 2010–13 2007–10 2010–13 2007–10 2010–13 2007–10 2010–13
NHS Education Public admin Other
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
em
plo
ym
en
t in
pre
vio
us
ye
ar,
a
ve
rag
ed
ove
r th
ree
-ye
ar
pe
rio
ds
Net inflow from non-employment Inflow from elsewhere in public sector
Outflow to elsewhere in public sector Inflow from private sector
Outflow to private sector Average overall change
Summary of decomposition results
Overall changes
• Initial cuts to the public workforce quite sharp in 2011 and delivered by reductions in inflows from private sector and increase in net outflows to non-employment.
• After 2011, pace of cuts slowed, outflows to the private sector increased and were delivered with relatively few people moving out of employment
Changes by part of public sector
• Cuts to the public workforce smallest in the protected areas of NHS and education
• Largest cuts in public administration and other areas of public sector
• Unclear if workers in public admin and other parts of public sector will continue to find jobs in health and education
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
Declining levels of within sector mobility
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f p
ub
lic/
pri
va
te w
ork
forc
e
Changed job within public sector - men Changed job within private sector - men
Changed job within public sector - women Changed job within private sector - women
Source: Authors’ calculations using NES and ASHE Panel Dataset
Explanations for declining levels of within sector mobility
• Mobility within public sector close to lowest level in last 30 years
– Seems to reflect an ageing of the public workforce
• Mobility within private sector also close to lowest level in last 30 years
– BUT...this is seen across all age levels
– Reflects declining levels of movements across firm rather than within firm
– Partially reflects declines in redundancies
– But, also likely to reflect reduced voluntary movements
• More work needed to understand if declining levels of within sector mobility reflects barriers to moving from less to more productive jobs
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
Lower levels of geographical mobility in public sector
© Institute for Fiscal Studies
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f p
ub
lic/
pri
va
te w
ork
forc
e
Changed region - men in public sector Changed region - men in private sector
Changed region - women in public sector Changed region - women in private sector
Source: Authors’ calculations using New Earnings Survey Panel Dataset
Conclusions
• Government is expected to make further cuts to public sector employment, having already made large cuts
– 1% average pay awards from 2016–17 reduces projected workforce cuts
• Although there was some net outflow to non-employment in 2011, more recent cuts have been delivered without a big increase in net outflows to non-employment
– Increase outflows to private sector and reduced inflows from private sector
– Will this continue?
• Decline in within sector mobility in the private sector
– More work needed to understand if this has negative consequences
• Relatively low levels of geographical mobility in public sector
– Former public sector workers looking for jobs within existing region
© Institute for Fiscal Studies