Mobile County School District SPED 6-9 End of Year Consultative Session 2010-2011
17
Mobile County School District SPED 6-9 End of Year Consultative Session 2010-2011
description
Mobile County School District SPED 6-9 End of Year Consultative Session 2010-2011. Cambium is the only provider focused solely on the intervention market and covering the spectrum of at-risk needs. Are You Following the Five Keys?. What Voyager Recommends. Amount of Instruction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Mobile County School District SPED 6-9 End of Year Consultative Session 2010-2011
Mobile County School DistrictSPED 6-9
End of Year Consultative Session 2010-2011
Cambium is the only provider focused solely on the intervention market and covering the spectrum of at-risk needs
Are You Following the Five Keys?What Voyager Recommends
Amount of Instruction5 days per week, 40 minutes per dayOne lesson per day (some lessons will be 1 ½ to 2 days if time is less than 40 minutes or students need extra time)Start within 4 weeks of school start date
Use of AssessmentsInitial Assessment: prior to instruction at the beginning of the yearComputational Fluency Benchmark Assessments: 3 times per yearComputational Fluency Progress Monitoring Assessments mid-modulePre-Tests and Post Tests: beginning and end of each module Finial Assessment: after instruction at the end of the year
Quality of Instruction3 hours of initial training on using scripted dialogue to scaffold instruction, implementing small-group instruction, administering assessments, using VmathLive, and using VPORTPrincipal/Coach reviews teacher instruction, teacher complete self analysis
DifferentiationSmall group instructionUse Initial Assessments and Pre-Tests to identify strengths and weaknesses in math contentDifferentiate instruction using VmathLive
Classroom ManagementSmall group area identified; Vmath scheduledOverhead projector, Smartboard, or teacher computer with projector available to teach lessonsWeb-accessible computers for VmathLive designated
This report should help with:
Report Focus
1. Answering Key Research Questions on Student GrowthA. Report will focus on key assessments and
demographics pertinent to this implementation.B. Analysis will focus on average growth, categorical
change, meeting expected gains, percentile rank changes and effect size, where applicable.
2. Analyzing the District Average first and then looking at School and Class results to identify support needs.
3. Reviewing implementation quality where possible to ensure results are maximized.
4. Reviewing additional items such as student applications and non-standard reporting to see how they impact students.
Population Review
Items F (PA)
G (PA)
H (PA) I (PA) Total
Classes 24 42 42 142 250
Students in Class 334 1301 1189 1490 4,314
Students Enrolled 318 344 396 629 1,687
Students with B1 Scores 219 240 254 228 941
Students with B2 Scores 214 210 266 205 895
Students with B3 Scores 231 234 258 156 879
Students with B4 Scores 204 175 213 138 730
Full Year Students (B1, B2, B3, B4 Scores)
129 113 150 116 508
Progress Assessments
Benchmark 1 Benchmark 2 Benchmark 3 Benchmark 4
08/23/2010 - 09/10/2010
11/08/2010 - 11/19/2010
02/14/2011 - 02/25/2011
05/02/2011 - 05/13/2011
Grade
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8
F 125 121 137 114 118 56 37 39
G 146 145 148 136 99 68 34 52
H 193 181 176 163 174 126 104 38
I 126 129 118 128 111 102 78 63
Total 590 576 579 541 502 352 253 192
Modules (Matched Scores)*
*Matched scores indicate students have both a Pre and Post Test score for any given module.
Level F Progress Assessment129 students have scores in Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
Students gained 241.9 Quantiles between Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
The percentage of students Meeting Standards improved by 28% from Benchmark 1 to Benchmark 4.
Meets Standards Improvement
Total Students: Number of students Rostered in grade level.Scored: Students with a score in Benchmark 1 or Benchmark 4.Matched: Students with scores in both Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
Level F Module Growth
Students have matched scores in Modules 1-8 and show gains in seven of eight modules, with Module 1 showing the greatest percentage gain.
Matched scores indicate students have both a Pre and Post Test score for any given module.
Level G Progress Assessment113 students have scores in Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
Students gained 75.1 Quantiles between Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
The percentage of students Meeting Standards improved by 2% from Benchmark 1 to Benchmark 4.
Meets Standards Improvement
Total Students: Number of students Rostered in grade level.Scored: Students with a score in Benchmark 1 or Benchmark 4.Matched: Students with scores in both Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
Level G Module Growth
Students have matched scores in Modules 1-8 and show gains in all eight modules, with Module 8 showing the greatest percentage gain.
Matched scores indicate students have both a Pre and Post Test score for any given module.
Level H Progress Assessment150 students have scores in Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
Students gained 105.4 Quantiles between Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
The percentage of students Meeting Standards improved by 5% from Benchmark 1 to Benchmark 4.
Meets Standards Improvement
Total Students: Number of students Rostered in grade level.Scored: Students with a score in Benchmark 1 or Benchmark 4.Matched: Students with scores in both Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
Level H Module Growth
Students have matched scores in Modules 1-8 and show gains in all eight modules, with Module 8 showing the greatest percentage gain.
Matched scores indicate students have both a Pre and Post Test score for any given module.
Level I Progress Assessment116 students have scores in Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
Students gained 73 Quantiles between Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
The percentage of students Meeting Standards decreased by 1% from Benchmark 1 to Benchmark 4.
Meets Standards Improvement
Total Students: Number of students Rostered in grade level.Scored: Students with a score in Benchmark 1 or Benchmark 4.Matched: Students with scores in both Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 4.
Level I Module Growth
Students have matched scores in Modules 1-8 and show gains in all eight modules, with Module 5 showing the greatest percentage gain.
Matched scores indicate students have both a Pre and Post Test score for any given module.
Quantile RangesTypical Grade RangesBased on studies, we have determined the following approximate Quantile ranges for each grade level. In understanding student measures, these represent about the middle 50% of the students.
To interpret what a Quantile measure means for a specific student, two pieces of information are needed: (1) the Quantile measure, and (2) the grade level during which the student received his or her Quantile measure.
For example, a higher Quantile measure within a specific grade range indicates that a student probably has very few problems with grade-level material (textbooks and assignments) in school. A lower Quantile measure indicates that a student most likely struggles to understand and be successful with grade-level material.
Source: www.quantiles.com
*Algebra I is typically taught at grade 9; Geometry is typically taught at grade 10; and Algebra II is typically taught at grade 11.
Addendum• VmathLive Reporting• Class Distribution• Raw Scores (Provided Electronically)
School and Class Results Provided in Separate Report upon request.
VmathLive Results: Results are based on targeted activities covering specific math objectives
Activities (N =151,937) % of Activities Mastered
Students averaged understanding 71% before completing activities on targeted objectives. After practicing and reviewing independently, students understood 89% on average and completed 80% of activities with Mastery.
Want this report more often or detail by class and school? Log into www.vmathlive.com and click on Report Generator.
