MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT - … MyPrivateBanking... · mobile apps for wealth management,...
-
Upload
truongxuyen -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT - … MyPrivateBanking... · mobile apps for wealth management,...
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH
MANAGEMENT THE NEXT LEVEL OF DIGITAL SERVICE:
PERSONALIZED APPS FOR YOUR MOST
VALUABLE CLIENTS
Data – Analysis – Implications – Learnings
www.MyPrivateBanking.com
May 2016
Rosalia Engchuan
Analyst
Report Extract
Original Report with 179 pages
Plus Data Appendix with individual
evaluations of 30 wealth managers
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
2.0 OVERALL RANKING 14
3.0 WEALTH SERVICE INDICATOR RANKING 15
4.0 METHODOLOGY 16
SELECTION OF BANKS AND APPS 16
USE CASES AS A GUIDELINE 11
EVALUATION PROCEDURE 12
DETERMINING THE CRITERIA 13
WEALTH SERVICE INDICATOR 14
5.0 STRATEGY: MOBILE APPS - A WEALTH MANAGER’S
STRONGEST COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE 27
WHO ARE THE (CURRENT AND FUTURE) WEALTH MANAGEMENT CLIENTS? 28
DRIVERS OF CHANGE AFFECTING THE OVERALL STRATEGY 30
THE CASE FOR A DEDICATED WEALTH MANAGEMENT APP 40
PERSONALIZING THE DIGITAL AND MOBILE WEALTH CLIENT JOURNEY 40
USE CASE FOR MOBILE APPS 41
INNOVATIVE METHODS FOR APP DEVELOPMENT 42
OVERARCHING TRENDS WITH REGARD TO APP CAPABILITIES 43
A STRATEGY FOR SOPHISTICATED WEALTH APPS 44
SILVER – MUST HAVE FEATURES 45
GOLD - ADVANCED FEATURES 50
PLATINUM – PARTICULARLY INNOVATIVE FEATURES 51
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 3
6.0 TOP 15 BEST PRACTICES 53
WEALTH FEATURES 54
INVESTMENT TOOLS 57
USABILITY 59
PERSONALIZATION 61
VALUE ADDING INTERACTIVE TOOLS 64
7.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 65
CRITICAL APP FUNCTIONS 65
TRENDS OVER THE PAST 3 YEARS 66
AVAILABILITY OF MOBILE APPS 67
CORE FUNCTIONS FOR CLIENTS 68
CRITERIA COVERAGE CORE FUNCTIONS FOR CLIENTS 69
SECURITY 70
CUSTOMER RETENTION AND MARKETING 72
CONTACT FEATURES 74
TECHNICAL FEATURES AND SUPPORT 75
PLATFORM INTEGRATION 77
YEAR ON YEAR PERFORMANCE 2015 AND 2016 79
WEALTH SERVICE INDICATOR 80
A CLOSER LOOK INTO PERSONALIZATION CAPABILITIES 84
PERFORMANCE IN THE GOLD SILVER PLATINUM CATEGORIES 85
8.0 INDIVIDUAL WEALTH MANAGER PROFILES 89
XXX: A SOLID OFFERING FOCUSED ON PRIVATE CLIENTS, BUT IT NEEDS TO EVOLVE FURTHER
TO MEET SPECIFIC WEALTH MANAGEMENT NEEDS. 90
XXX: STRONG MOBILE APP OFFERING BUT WEAK IN DEDICATED WEALTH FUNCTIONS. 93
XXX: AN EXCELLENT SOLUTION THAT LEADS THE PACK IN CUSTOMER RETENTION AND
MARKETING. 96
XXX: A WELL-INTENDED WEALTH MANAGEMENT FOCUS FAILED BY LOW FUNCTIONALITY
AND CONTENT. 99
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 4
XXX: A SUCCESSFUL PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN TWO APPS, RESULTING IN A SECURE OFFERING
WITH SOME ASPECTS FOR FURTHER REFINEMENT. 102
XXX: HIGHLY PERSONALIZED APP WITH THE HIGHEST WEALTH SERVICE INDICATOR ON THE
MARKET. 105
XXX: A NEGLECTED SOLUTION THAT NEEDS RENEWAL AND ENHANCEMENT IN KEY
CATEGORIES 108
XXX: EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE ON THE DIGITAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT FRONT. 111
XXX: INNOVATIVE MOBILE BANKING CAPABILITIES WITH PRIVATE CLIENT POTENTIAL 114
XXX: A POTENT APP PARTNERSHIP THAT MEETS ALMOST ALL WM CLIENT NEEDS. 117
XXX: STRONG CONTENDER FOR CORE FUNCTIONS BUT LACKING A DEDICATED APP. 120
XXX: A POTENTIAL LEADER IN MOST CATEGORIES, ALREADY A LEADER IN SOME. 123
XXX: TECHNICALLY STRONG, BUT AN OUTDATED APP IN TERMS OF SECURITY AND
FUNCTIONALITY. 126
XXX: A VERY SECURE, RECENT WEALTH MANAGEMENT FOCUS THAT DOES NOT YET FILL ALL
THE GAPS AS A COMPLETE OFFERING. 129
XXX: A POTENTIALLY STRONG WEALTH MANAGEMENT FOCUS, PROVIDED SOME
ENHANCEMENTS ARE IMPLEMENTED. 132
XXX: TECHNICALLY STRONG AND SECURE APP FOR ALL PLATFORMS AND DEVICES, BUT IT
MISSES KEY RETENTION AND MARKETING OPPORTUNITIES. 135
XXX: SECURE BUT LIMITED WM FUNCTIONALITY IN SIMILAR APPS FOR SMARTPHONE AND
TABLET 138
XXX: A FORMIDABLE EXAMPLE OF DELIVERING CORE WM FUNCTIONS, BUT REQUIRES WORK
IN OTHER CATEGORIES. 141
XXX: EXCLUSIVELY FOCUSED ON WEALTH MANAGEMENT, BUT REQUIRES SOME
INNOVATION AND MORE WORK IN ALL CATEGORIES. 144
XXX: LEADS THE PACK WITH FEATURES NEGLECTED BY RIVALS - AN EXCELLENT FOUNDATION
READY FOR EVOLUTION. 147
XXX: SOME HIGHLIGHTS, BUT REQUIRES WORK IN MOST CATEGORIES. 150
XXX: ONE YEAR LATER: A GOOD SOLUTION THAT NOW REQUIRES MORE INNOVATION. 153
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 5
XXX: A SOLID FOUNDATION THAT WILL REQUIRE SOME IMPORTANT IMPROVEMENTS TO
STAY WITHIN THE TOP RANKS. 156
XXX: A GOOD START BUT REQUIRES MAJOR WORK TOWARDS FULL MATURATION. 159
XXX: A VERY SECURE SOLUTION WITH STRONG CORE FUNCTIONS, BUT LACKING IN SOME
OTHER CATEGORIES. 162
XXX: A WINNING APP PORTFOLIO WITH GROUNDBREAKING FEATURES. 165
XXX: A STRONG, SECURE CONTENDER WITH GOOD CORE WM FUNCTIONALITY AND SOME
DRAWBACKS IN RETENTION AND MARKETING. 168
XXX: A SECURE AND TECHNICALLY COMPETENT OFFERING THAT IS LOW ON CORE
FUNCTIONS, CONTACT FEATURES AND RETENTION/MARKETING. 171
XXX: A WELL-SUSTAINED APP PARTNERSHIP THAT HAS MATURED, WITH WORK STILL
OUTSTANDING ON CORE FUNCTIONS. 174
XXX: A VERY SECURE APP WITH GOOD CORE WM FUNCTIONS, BUT IT DOES LITTLE TO
RETAIN CLIENTS AND HAS TECHNICAL CHALLENGES. 177
AUTHORS 180
DISCLAIMER 181
To order the full report, please click here.
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 6
TABLE OF CHARTS
Trend over the past 3 years.......................................................................................... 10
Ritz-Carlton Mobile App ............................................................................................... 29
BNP Paribas NextGen Club app .................................................................................... 32
AsiaNews ..................................................................................................................... 33
A peek into Credit Suisse Asia Pacific app capabilities .................................................. 34
A peek into UBS app capabilities .................................................................................. 34
Source: Statista as of end April 2016 ............................................................................ 37
Hyatt Chatbot Advertising ............................................................................................ 38
Facebook Messenger Airline Bot .................................................................................. 38
Sample Bot Communication ......................................................................................... 39
Average Retention Rates ............................................................................................. 42
Pyramid of Silver, Gold and Platinum Capabilities ........................................................ 45
Peek Balance Example (DBS) ........................................................................................ 47
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 54
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 55
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 56
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 57
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 58
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 59
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 59
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 60
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 61
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 62
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 62
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 63
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 64
Best Practice XXX ......................................................................................................... 64
Critical app functions ................................................................................................... 65
Trends over the past 3 years ........................................................................................ 66
Criteria coverage availability of mobile apps ................................................................ 67
Ranking availability of mobile apps .............................................................................. 68
Criteria coverage core functions for clients .................................................................. 69
Ranking core functions for clients ................................................................................ 70
Criteria coverage security ............................................................................................ 71
Criteria coverage customer retention and marketing ................................................... 73
Ranking customer retention and marketing ................................................................. 73
Criteria coverage contact features ............................................................................... 74
Ranking contact features ............................................................................................. 75
Criteria coverage technical features and support ......................................................... 76
Ranking technical features and support ....................................................................... 76
Criteria coverage platform integration ......................................................................... 78
Ranking platform integration ....................................................................................... 78
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 7
Year on year performance of banks 2015 and 2016...................................................... 79
Trends in performance 2015 and 2016 ......................................................................... 80
Criteria coverage Wealth Service Indicator................................................................... 83
Ranking Wealth Service Indicator ................................................................................. 83
Criteria coverage Personalization ................................................................................. 84
Ranking personalization ............................................................................................... 85
Average performance in the Silver, Gold and Platinum categories................................ 86
Criteria coverage Platinum features ............................................................................. 86
Ranking Platinum features ........................................................................................... 87
Criteria coverage Gold features.................................................................................... 87
Ranking Gold features .................................................................................................. 88
REPORT EXTRACT
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 8
1.0 SUMMARY
Wealth managers have come to acknowledge the importance of mobile apps: 82
percent provide their clients with apps that cater exclusively and specifically to the
needs of high-net-worth individuals. These is one of the key findings of this report for
which MyPrivateBanking Research analyzed and ranked, in total, 60 mobile apps of 30
leading wealth managers worldwide. The share of exclusive apps for wealthy clients
increased significantly compared to our last year’s survey, when the average in this
category was at 63 percent.
In MyPrivateBanking’s view the question for wealth managers is no longer if they should
have a mobile app, but how they can develop a winning mobile app to provide them
with an essential competitive advantage. However, many private banks struggle to offer
state of the art apps. They cover basic requirements but still do not differentiate
themselves from retail apps and fail to offer their wealth clients a valuable and
personalized digital journey.
Top 5 Wealth Managers with the Best Mobile Apps
A select group of wealth managers leads our ranking when it comes to addressing the
digital needs of HNW clients:
Rank 2016 (2015)
Wealth Manager Total Points (max. 80)
1 (9) UBS 69 2 (2) Credit Suisse 65
3 (1) BNP Paribas 64
4 (7) DBS 61 5 (4) Societe Generale 58
The leading wealth managers’ mobile apps rated particularly high for their offerings of
remote channels for client and advisor interaction and advanced personalization
capabilities. The full report profiles and analyses in detail the mobile apps of the Top 30-
wealth managers’ and offers an overall ranking of their app offerings as well as a
separate ranking for each of the offered app features.
REPORT EXTRACT
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 9
Wealth managers’ apps should go beyond the usual
The MyPrivateBanking report identifies overall several weak points in the available
mobile apps for wealth management, among them a lack of core functions such as
interactive tools for portfolio analysis (only offered by 11 out of 30 wealth managers)
and the fact that not even half of the wealth managers allow direct contact to a
personal advisor. In addition, features for customer retention and marketing were
considered to be sub-standard, as only eight wealth managers offer access to an
exclusive customer magazine, and personalized, targeted push messages are found in
only seven wealth management apps. In total the reports details the performance of
eight different app features and identifies must-have, advanced and particularly
innovative features. 15 best practices provide in-depth illustrations on how to optimize
these features for mobile apps targeted towards wealthy clients.
The report analyses in distinct profiles what can be learned from each wealth managers
mobile apps offerings and draws as well numerous strategic recommendations for
developing a top performing wealth app such as:
Develop a dedicated and exclusive wealth app. Wealth management clients
expect extra value and differentiation from the retail experience. Offering a true
wealth app begins with an exclusive design and color scheme, a personalized
greeting when logging in, direct access to an advisor and access to relevant and
inspiring content.
Build a remote channel for client and advisor interaction. The whole business
model of wealth management is transforming as a result of the technical
opportunities brought about by the digital revolution. Wealth managers should
see this revolution as an opportunity and embrace the possibilities for
interacting with clients on a whole new level.
Work on an omni-channel strategy. The whole idea of an omni-channel strategy
is to offer clients the opportunity to choose how they will interact with their
wealth manager. Wealth managers need to provide the infrastructure to enable
such an omni-channel experience, for instance through seamless integration of
the social media platforms and mobile apps.
The report details as well why wealth managers should watch the robo-advisors
revolution. What sound like distant future scenarios to many are already a reality for
new FinTech providers that are also beginning to penetrate the wealth management
market. Sophisticated wealth apps should provide clients with tools to build
hypothetical portfolios and receive product recommendations based on their unique
financial situation.
REPORT EXTRACT
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 10
2.0 OVERALL RANKING
Rank 2016 Wealth Manager Total Points Availability of Mobile Apps
(max 8)
Core functions for clients (max
20)
Security (max 7)
Customer retention and marketing
(max 13)
Contact features (max 8 )
Technical features and support (max
12)
Platform integration
(max 9)
Best Practices (max 3)
1 UBS 69
2 Credit Suisse 65
3 BNP Paribas 64
4 DBS 61
5 Societe
Generale 58
6 55
8 12 7 4 7 9 5 3
7 53
5 14 3 10 5 9 4 3
8 52
7 7 5 7 7 10 7 2
8 52
8 14 6 3 6 9 5 1
10 51
7 10 4 6 6 10 6 2
10 51
6 9 6 8 4 9 6 3
12 50
8 12 5 4 6 9 5 1
12 50
7 16 4 5 3 8 4 3
14 48
8 12 6 3 2 11 5 1
14 48
6 10 6 5 5 10 4 2
16 46
5 11 5 5 3 9 6 2
16 46
5 12 7 4 4 7 5 2
18 45
5 11 6 7 3 6 4 3
18 45
6 7 6 8 2 9 4 3
20 44
5 14 6 3 4 8 4 0
21 42
7 10 7 2 5 8 2 1
21 42
5 10 4 6 1 10 4 2
21 42
5 9 5 6 3 10 4 0
24 39
5 3 4 3 7 11 4 2
24 39
6 8 4 3 5 7 6 0
26 37
6 8 4 0 4 11 4 0
27 36
5 7 2 2 4 11 4 1
28 35
6 8 5 0 4 9 3 0
28 35
5 6 3 5 1 9 4 2
30 32
6 7 6 0 2 9 2 0
REPORT EXTRACT
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 11
3.0 WEALTH SERVICE INDICATOR RANKING
The Wealth Service Indicator was newly introduced in this study in order to
show the level of wealth service of an app. Some apps offer a lot of content
and features but lack specific wealth features, that make the difference
between a retail app and a truly sophisticated wealth app.
(more in full report)
Bank Points
22
19
18
17
16
15
15
13
12
12
12
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
8
8
7
6
6
4
Coloring of cells indicates
relative performance in the respective categories. Green: top performance
Light Green: better than average
Yellow: average
Orange: below average
Red: lacking
REPORT EXTRACT
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 12
4.0 METHODOLOGY
SELECTION OF BANKS AND APPS
This study analyzes the mobile apps of 30 leading private banks and wealth managers
that offer apps for their private clients. The banks under evaluation were selected on the
basis of their wealth management assets under management by the end of 2015,
provided that the wealth managers had a significant mobile presence. A small group of
wealth management firms was added to our selection despite their assets under
management being below the threshold mark. These providers were admitted in order
to make sure that all global regions were represented.
For all wealth managers, mobile apps were identified globally on various mobile app
platforms including Apple iOS, Android, BlackBerry and Windows Phone. To be included
in the evaluation, an app had to exhibit at least some features that are specifically for
HNW clients, such as investment portfolio overview, trading/brokerage capability, and
content and features that are of particular interest to wealth clients.
We have excluded apps that are solely intended for institutional clients or commercial
clients. Also excluded were any apps that were solely dedicated to a bank’s investor
relations activities or apps with a clear retail focus.
Apps were included in the analysis if they met the following criteria:
Available to wealth clients The apps had to be promoted as wealth management apps on the website or in the app store description.
(more in full report)
USE CASES AS A GUIDELINE
Use Case Objectives
Portfolio check Overview of investment portfolio and portfolio analysis capabilities (asset allocation, performance over time)
Trading and brokerage
(more in full report)
REPORT EXTRACT
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 13
The criteria were derived from use cases defined on the basis of years of research in this
field, including, for example, regular in-depth interviews with wealth managers and
comprehensive surveys aimed at profiling today’s digital use patterns of high-net-worth
clients (for more information, see here).
(more in full report)
EVALUATION PROCEDURE
Two analysts evaluated each app independently of each other within an interval of four
weeks to minimize the possibility of faults due to subjective points of view and
accidental network problems at a certain point in time. Given the quantity of
information that had to be analyzed, the possibility of not finding all the information in
individual cases cannot be ruled out. The evaluation was done on the basis of 50
different criteria that were divided into eight main categories. Care was taken to keep
the definition and allocation of points as free as possible from all subjective influences,
thus ensuring a high level of objectivity in the benchmarking process.
In addition to the apps themselves, other sources of information were also included in
the analysis: user feedback and ratings in the app stores (Apple, Android), screenshots
from the major app stores (iTunes, Google Play, Windows Phone and BlackBerry),
information from the banks’ websites (often the banks displayed additional information
about their apps on their websites such as the privacy policy, FAQs or a video tutorial),
and occasionally other sources such as Twitter feeds, blogs, newspaper coverage, etc.
(more in full report)
DETERMINING THE CRITERIA
In this study, the main evaluation criterion for the apps was the extent to which they
fulfill the use cases described above. In contrast to previous editions of the report, we
were stricter with regard to the inclusion of embedded website content. So called
wrapper apps can be downloaded in app stores but are heavily reliant on website
content. Whilst this was considered okay when mobile apps were just introduced, it is
no longer tolerable to have such a solution, as user experience is considerably impaired.
We measured usability in terms of eight overarching criteria:
Availability of mobile apps
Core functions for clients
Security
Content and features for customer retention and marketing
Contact features
Technical features and support
REPORT EXTRACT
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 14
Platform integration
Best practices
In the following, the parameters for each criterion are described in detail, including the
maximum achievable points. In comparison to last year’s report, there have been some
changes in our rating scheme. These changes, along with several minor adjustments
(e.g. in the weighting for the criteria), reflect current developments and future trends in
the interface of wealth management and the digital world for the current
MyPrivateBanking report criteria on Mobile Apps for Wealth Management. Newly added
criteria reflect changes in the overall environment and the constant development of
technical features that can be realized in mobile apps. Overall, there is a trend towards
more interactivity and remote advisory within the wealth management industry.
(more in full report)
WEALTH SERVICE INDICATOR
The Wealth Service Indicator was newly introduced in this study in order to show the
level of wealth service of an app. Some apps offer a lot of content and features but lack
specific wealth features, that make the difference between a retail app and a truly
sophisticated wealth app.
(more in full report)
The Wealth Service Indicator measures performance in the following categories:
Specific app for wealth management clients: Only apps that are specifically dedicated to wealth management clients will offer a user experience that is adapted to the needs of the HNW clientele. Only offering the retail app to wealth clients will not be enough here. Of course there are other solutions, such as offering a wealth skin to wealth clients instead of featuring a stand-alone app. The most important thing is giving HNW clients the feeling that their needs are met.
(more in full report)
REPORT EXTRACT
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 15
5.0 STRATEGY: MOBILE APPS - A WEALTH MANAGER’S
STRONGEST COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
(more in full report p.27 to 52)
6.0 TOP 15 BEST PRACTICES
(more in full report p.53 to 64)
7.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
(more in full report p.65 to 88)
8.0 INDIVIDUAL WEALTH MANAGER PROFILES
(more in full report p.89 to 179)
REPORT EXTRACT
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 16
AUTHORS
Rosalia Engchuan, Analyst, has a research focus on the mobile and web presences
of wealth managers and banks as well as on the impact of disruptive technologies
on the wealth management sector. She specializes in online communication
technologies and mobile channel strategies. Rosalia has previously worked as a
CSR Analyst in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and as digital media consultant. She studied
in Germany and Malaysia holds a Bachelor Degree in Asian Studies and
Management.
Anton Venter, Analyst, does research on the use of technology for applications
supporting banks and wealth managers, with a focus on Customer Servicing
channels and Intermediary Support applications. Before focusing on research he
worked for over 26 years at Old Mutual, a leading financial services institution in
South Africa. As Technology Architect his role included functions such as vendor
management, technology road mapping and the practice of Enterprise
Architecture. Anton holds a Master’s Degree in Computer Science from the
University of Cape Town.
Steffen Binder, Managing Director and co-founder of MyPrivateBanking
Research. Steffen is Head of Research and oversees the research agenda and
analyst teams. He is responsible for creating and developing powerful concepts
and relevant content to help our clients navigate a rapidly changing digital
environment. As a regular speaker at finance and technology industry events
around the globe, Steffen is frequently quoted by leading business media such as
the Wall Street Journal, Handelsblatt and the Financial Times. Prior to this, Steffen
was Managing Director of Forrester Germany, Switzerland and Austria. He came
to Forrester through its acquisition of Forit GmbH, a leading European technology
research company, of which he was also a co-founder. Prior to that, Steffen was a
partner at Monitor Company (Strategy Consulting). He holds Master’s Degrees in
Organizational Behavior from Rutgers University (USA) and in Public Administration
from the University of Konstanz (Germany).
REPORT EXTRACT
MOBILE APPS FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT │ 17
DISCLAIMER
IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMERS:
NO INVESTMENT ADVICE
This report is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where
such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. This report is distributed for informational purposes only and
should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation to sell or buy any security or other
investment, or undertake any investment strategy. It does not constitute a general or personal
recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of
individual investors. The price and value of securities referred to in this report will fluctuate. Past
performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of all of
the original capital invested in a security discussed in this report may occur. Certain transactions, including
those involving futures, options, and other derivatives, give rise to substantial risk and are not suitable for
all investors.
DISCLAIMERS
There are no warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or results obtained from
any information set forth in this report. MyPrivateBanking GmbH will not be liable to you or anyone else for
any loss or injury resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the information contained in this report,
caused in whole or in part by its negligence in compiling, interpreting, reporting or delivering the content in
this report.
COPYRIGHT
MyPrivateBanking GmbH’s Products are the property of MyPrivateBanking GmbH, Switzerland, and are
protected by Swiss and international copyright law and other intellectual property laws. Customers are
prohibited to copy, forward or store MyPrivateBanking Products outside of the legal entity that has made
the purchase.
MyPrivateBanking GmbH
Hafenstrasse 50B
CH-8280 Kreuzlingen, Switzerland
Tel. +41 71 566 10 05
For our latest reports please check: http://www.myprivatebanking.com/Category/reports