MM in Greece & the Contribution of EPOMM-PLUS project in setting

up a National MM Network DELTA / EPOMM PLUS Joint Conference on

Mobility Management and Seasonal Traffic Flows Athens 4-5 October 2010

Prof. Panos PapaioannouPublic Transport AuthoritySofia BoukiAristotle University of Thessaloniki

Presentation Outline

• Current Situation• Governance of Transport and Mobility • Existing Networks in Greece• AUTh goals through EPOMM PLUS• Alternative Networking Approaches• Barriers• Opportunities• Recent & Next Steps

Mobility Management in Greece -Current Situation

• Late development of MM in Greece

• Lack of formal MM Networks

• MM has been developing so far through isolated efforts mainly at the Municipality level

• Until recently no MM policy from the Central Government

• Marginal MM efforts by Public Transport Authorities in Athens and Thessaloniki

• Strong involvement of various Greek actors in EU funded research or other projects (Interreg, etc)

• Increasing number of transportation professional specialising in MM

• Gradual but steady introduction of MM knowledge into University courses

• Involvement of NGO’s and other agencies in MM related actions

Governance - Current Situation

• Three main governance levels:– National (elected)– Regional (appointed)– Local (Prefectural and Municipal)

• After 1/1/2011– National (elected)– Regional (elected)– Local (Municipal)

NATIONAL LEVELPolicy makingResponsible Ministries for MM1. Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Networks 2. Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climatic Change

Policy deliveryAthens: Athens Urban Transport OrganizationThessaloniki: Thessaloniki Public Transport Council

Prefectures, Municipalities and Regions can implement transport related measures at the area of their responsibility FinancingGreek Treasury • awards funds for each Ministry in the yearly state budget• distributes the European funds to local recipients• the state funds a number of activities through the Programme of Public Investments

Governance of Transport and Mobility (1/3)

REGIONAL LEVELPolicy making• Currently regional authorities do not draw MM policy• In the two major cities, Athens & Thessaloniki, Master Plan Organizations can voice their opinion but without being legally binding

Policy delivery• Regional highway authorities are responsible for implementing part of MM policy related to the road network under their responsibilities

FinancingRegional authorities fund MM actions and measures either directly or through Municipalities of policy

Governance of Transport and Mobility (2/3)

LOCAL LEVELPolicy makingLocal Authorities can only propose MM measures that are in line with the MM policy of the Ministry

Policy delivery• Local Authorities implement MM measures within their jurisdiction.

• MM implementation by a local authority can be done through a co-operation with other Authorities or developing agencies.

FinancingFunding of a local MM policy, can be made through

– the local authority budget– special funding programme from the Ministry of Interior– participation in National Strategic Reference Framework

Governance of Transport and Mobility (3/3)

Networking- Several cities belonging to European networks (POLIS, Car Free Cities) are activated in MM as part of various common international activities. -No national autonomous network promoting MM

ResearchResearch on MM is mainly undertaken by:-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh)-National Technical University of Athens -Hellenic Institute of Transport-Other Institutes such as CRES

Existing Networks in Greece (1/2)

Advice – Technical Support

Technical advice and support is provided through either the previously mentioned Institutions or private consulting firms

Training in Mobility Management-No systematic training at a wide range in Mobility Management -Usual cases where relevant training is provided are through seminars, mainly to Public Employees by experts, organised by the Training Institute of the National Centre for Public Administration.

Energy Efficient Transport

There was no until recently an on going policy towards energy efficiency transport except in the Public Transport companies which use at a certain degree vehicles powered by natural gas.

Existing Networks in Greece (2/2)

Examples of MM actions

• European Mobility Week

• Ecomobility

• Mobility Centre in Kalamaria, Thessaloniki

• Mobility related education in some schools (Bambini project)

• Energy efficiency related activities

Area in km2 Population GDP in EuroMotorisation

car/1000 inhab.Road fatalities per

million inhab.

Austria 84,000 8,100,000 32,600 512 92

Belgium 30,528 10,730,000 31,300 477 104

Bulgaria 110,910 7,606,550 1,967 700 150

Czech Republic 78,864 10,400,000 13,200 401 126

Estonia 45,228 1,350,000 14,495 294 100

France 675,417 65,073,482 32,457 474 68

Finland 338,000 5,300,000 34,769 507 72

Germany 352,022 82,536,680 30,300 600 65

Greece 131,957 10,964,020 16,700 385 146

Hungary 93,000 10,020,000 13,959 305 99

Italy 301,338 60,045,068 21,560 600 90

Lithuania 65,300 3,349,000 2,050 506 148

Netherlands 41,526 16,500,156 28,594 457 48

Poland 312,685 38,115,909 12,325 559 143

Portugal 92,090 10,618,000 16,000 572 118

Slovenia 20,273 2,022,629 17,162 514 129

Spain 505,182 46,000,000 26,200 467 89

Sweden 449,964 9,316,256 33,852 463 45

UK 242,000 60,399,118 30,315 426** 55

Denmark 43,100 5,400,000 42,000 345 61

Switzerland 41,000 7,500,000 43,745 517 51

EU Comparative figures

EPOMM PLUS objectives in Greece

• Creation of a National MM Network and preparing the country to become EPOMM - member.

• Other objectives: – Creation of a web portal that will present MM material

through EPOMM.– Presentation of good practice mobility examples for all

other urban areas in Greece– Presentation of good practice mobility examples of

areas with string seasonal mobility variations (material from DELTA project)

Steps for creating MM Network

• 1st step: Specify objectives• 2nd step: Identify stakeholders• 3hd step: Build network• 4th step: Strengthen the network

1. Convincing responsible authorities to shape new Transport Policies and consequently new transport plans at various levels (National, Regional and Local) that will be more environmentally friendly and that will take into consideration the needs of citizens rather than the needs of vehicles. Public Transport should be in the core of this new transport policy along with integrated Mobility Management Plans

2. Coordinating involved authorities belonging to different levels but acting at the same level with respect to transport policy issues as well as to operational issues

AUTh role in EPOMM-PLUS (1/2)

3. Demonstrating the power of travel awareness campaigns as well as mobility management measures in general in changing travel attitudes and behaviour of trip makers

4. Indicating actions to be taken at various levels for facilitating the implementation of mobility management measures

5. Disseminating good practices through active networks of municipalities within Greece and to educate practitioners

6. Exploiting existing knowledge from EPOMM and from various European projects and networks

AUTh role in EPOMM-PLUS (2/2)

MM stakeholders (1/4)

Ministries• Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and

Networks• Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate

Change• Ministry of Education, Lifelong Learning and

Religious Affairs• Ministry of Citizen Protection• Ministry of Interior (responsible for Regional and

Local Authorities)

MM stakeholders (2/4)

Transport and Planning Authorities• Athens Urban Transport Organization

(OASA in Greek) • Thessaloniki Public Transport Authority

(THEPTA, SASTH in Greek)• Master Plan Organization of Athens

(ORATH in Greek)• Master Plan Organization of Thessaloniki

(ORTHE in Greek)

MM stakeholders (3/4)

Universities & Institutes• Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Faculty of

Engineering)• National Technical University of Athens • University of Patras (Faculty of Engineering)• University of Thessaly (Faculty of Engineering)• Democritus University of Thrace (Faculty of

Engineering) • Hellenic Institute of Transport (HIT)• Center of Renewable Energy Sources (CRES)

MM stakeholders (4/4)

Public Transport Operators• Athens Metro Operating Company• Athens Light Rail (Tram)• Athens Thermal Buses Company (ETHEL)• Athens Trolley Bus Company (ILPAP)• Athens Suburban Rail Company (Proastiakos)• Thessaloniki Public Transport Organization

(OASTH)

MM Network Alternative Approaches • Create a network based on different

government authorities (i.e. regional authorities + PT authorities at metropolitan areas

• Create a network with a mix of government, regional and local authorities

• Create networks facing similar problems and challenges (eg. tourist areas, large cities, etc)

Barriers• Administrative restructuring in the country as of 1/1/2011

– Prefecture level is cancelled– Municipalities merge to larger ones– Re-allocation of responsibilities included transport and mobility

matter

• Regional Authorities lack knowledge and are not familiar with MM issues

• Low maturity level regarding MM in the majority of municipalities

• Priority is still given to other areas of concern (eg. Financing,, maintaining and managing infrastructure)

Opportunities

• Immediate need for MM implementation in urban areas

• Increased number of various agencies (public or private) activated in MM

• Increased involvement in EU projects dealing with MM

• Pro MM policies by new central government new• Increasing number of persons activated in MM

Recent and Next Steps• Disseminate EPOMM PLUS in the country• Use Institutionalised paths (such as The.P.T.A.)• Present MM, EPOMM and EPOMM PLUS in different for

a within Greece• Approach, inform and mobilise new regional and local

authorities, which will be elected in November 2010• Invite other involved authorities and NGO’s• Organise in 2011 a national event to be the Network

initiation phase• Decide on the form of the Greek National Network• Implement the other project activities (training,

educational material, etc)

Thank you for your attention