Mixtures of Essential Oils in an Air Conditioning Prototype to Reduce the Prevalence of Airborne...
Transcript of Mixtures of Essential Oils in an Air Conditioning Prototype to Reduce the Prevalence of Airborne...
This article was downloaded by: [York University Libraries]On: 21 November 2014, At: 04:04Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Essential Oil Bearing PlantsPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/teop20
Mixtures of Essential Oils in an Air ConditioningPrototype to Reduce the Prevalence of AirbornePathogenic BacteriaSupayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai a b , Sukanda Minbutra b , Lavanya Goodla a , JenniferJefferies c & Somboon Voravuthikunchai da Natural Products Research Center, Faculty of Science , Prince of Songkla University , HatYai , Songkhla 90112 , Thailandb Department of Microbiology , Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University , Hat Yai ,Songkhla 90112 , Thailandc Increasing your Health, Wealth and Sanity , PO Box 867 , North Lakes QLD 4509 , Australiahttp://www.jenniferjefferies.comd Department of Mechanical Engineering , Faculty of Engineering, Prince of SongklaUniversity , Hat Yai , Songkhla 90112 , ThailandPublished online: 12 Mar 2013.
To cite this article: Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai , Sukanda Minbutra , Lavanya Goodla , Jennifer Jefferies & SomboonVoravuthikunchai (2012) Mixtures of Essential Oils in an Air Conditioning Prototype to Reduce the Prevalence of AirbornePathogenic Bacteria, Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants, 15:5, 739-749, DOI: 10.1080/0972060X.2012.10644114
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2012.10644114
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Mixtures of Essential Oils in an Air Conditioning Prototype toReduce the Prevalence of Airborne Pathogenic Bacteria
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai 1, 2,*, Sukanda Minbutra 2,Lavanya Goodla 1, Jennifer Jefferies 3, Somboon Voravuthikunchai 4
1Natural Products Research Center, Faculty of Science,Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand.
2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science,Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand.
3 www.jenniferjefferies.com, Increasing your Health,Wealth and Sanity, PO Box 867, North Lakes QLD 4509, Australia4 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand
Abstract: The rationale for this work was to test the possibility of creating a protective atmosphere byusing natural compounds to minimize hazards from chemicals and to control the risk of common infections.The antimicrobial activities of essential oils of Agronis fragrans, Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Lavandulaangustifolia, Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree), Melaleuca nesophila (honey myrtle), Pelargonium x asperum(geranium), Pogostemon cablin (patchouli), Thymus serpyllum, and Thymus vulgaris were evaluated againstan array of environmental-borne pathogenic bacteria. Gram-positive bacteria included Bacillus subtilis andStaphylococcus aureus; four Gram-negative bacteria covered Acinetobacter baumanii, Escherichia coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In addition, eleven isolates of methicillin-resistant S.aureus (MRSA) and a multidrug-resistant A. baumanii were incorporated. In agar disc diffusion tests, cinnamonhad shown the strongest activity that could inhibit all pathogens, followed by lemon thyme, honey myrtle andlavender, while pachouli exhibited the weakest inhibition. Though fragonia possessed a broad range of activityagainst all pathogens, it did not inhibit some of the MRSA isolates. Cinnamon and lemon thyme demonstratedstrong activity measured by minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimal bactericidal concentrations.In disk volatilization assay, thyme oil demonstrated the greatest inhibition, followed by lemon thyme, while noinhibition from patchouli was observed. Subsequently, the composition of the atmosphere generated by threedifferent oil blends in our invented portable air-conditioning prototype was assessed. The results showed thatmixture of oil blend No. 2 can produce good synergistic effect in reducing the prevalence of airborne pathogens,and thus preventing the spreading of infections.
Key words: Acinetobacter baumanii, Air conditioning system, Essential oil, Staphylococcusaureus, Multidrug-resistant pathogenic bacteria
IntroductionDroplet infections have long been one of the
most deadly branches of infectious diseases.Airborne contamination continues as by far the
Journal of Essential Oil Bearing PlantsISSN Print: 0972-060X Online: 0976-5026www.jeobp.com
*Corresponding author (Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai)E-mail: < [email protected] > © 2012, Har Krishan Bhalla & Sons
Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 pp 739 - 749 739
Received 18 January 2012; accepted in revised form 12 May 2012
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14
most important route by which infectious diseasesspread. In the 21st century, the infections are stilla major public health issue for both developingand developed countries. For developingcountries, poverty, lack of health infrastructureand sanitation, immigration, trade, globalizationcontributes to the spread of the diseases. Fordeveloped countries, infectious diseases are athreat on the horizon because of the problem ofnew and drug-resistant microorganisms migratingto the industrialized countries. Numbers of highlyantibiotic resistant bacterial strains are increasing.Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) has become increasingly widespread asa cause of both nosocomial and communityinfections. In 2002, vancomycin-resistant S.aureus (VRSA) strains emerged in the UnitedStates 3, followed by reports of these isolates fromother parts of the World 1,6. More recently,multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter spp.have emerged as major causes of nosocomialinfections associated with significant morbidityand mortality rates 4,8,12,14.
Apparently concerns over the use of chemicalsthat could endanger people have been raised. Agrowing demand from consumers for safeproducts, desiring fewer synthetic substancestogether with their increased quality and safety,has resulted in extensive investigations fromresearchers to assess the feasibility of techniquesand to improve the quality and safety of products,while maintaining efficacy. There is a worldwidetrend to explore new alternatives to controlinfectious diseases, giving priority to methodsthat reduce disease incidence and avoid adverseeffects on human health. During the past decades,much attention has been paid to the use ofessential oils which are volatile oily liquidsobtained from different plant parts. Essential oilsfrom an estimated 3,000 plant species are known,of which about 300 are commercially produced,mainly for the flavours and fragrances market 2.
In spite of having been long recognized for theirantibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, insecticidaland antioxidant properties 11,17, the recent interestin alternative natural substances has led to a newscientific awareness of the value of essential oils.In other context, these substances have been
extensively studied for their antibacterialactivities against a wide range of microorganisms2,10,18. Some authors have suggested the use ofessential oils for prevention of the transmissionof resistant and harmful pathogens includingMRSA 16.
Selected essential oils commonly employed inaromatherapy were used in this study. Theseincluded Agronis fragrans J.R. Wheeler & N.G.Marchant (fragonia), Cinnamomum zeylanicumBlume Cheel (cinnamon), Lavandula angustifoliaMill. (Lavender), Melaleuca alternifolia (teatree), Melaleuca nesophila (honey myrtle),Pelargonium x asperum (geranium), Pogostemoncablin (Blanco) Benth. (Patchouli), Thymusserpyllum L. (lemon thyme), and Thymus vulgarisL. (thyme). The work presented in this communi-cation has three main aims: (i), to check theeffectiveness of selected essential oils againstdifferent pathogenic bacteria in solid phase bymeans of the disk diffusion method; (ii), toevaluate their effectiveness in vapour phase; and(iii), to apply the atmosphere generated by themost effective essential oils in a portable airconditioning prototype.
Materials and methodsEssential oilsEssential oils were extracted by hydro
distillation from the air dried plant material fromcinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum), fragonia(Agonis fragrans), lemon thyme (Thymusserpyllum), patchouli (Pogostemon cablin(Blanco) Benth.), geranium (Pelargoniumxasperum), honey myrtle (Melaleuca nesophila),tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia), lavender(Lavandula angustifolia), and thyme (Thymusvulgaris) using a Clevenger-type apparatus for 4hours. The oils were extracted with CHCl3 andthen were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 andstored under N2 atmosphere at 20°C in a sealedvial until use.
Preparation of essential oil mixturesOil blend No. 1Cinnamon 10%Geranium 30%Tea tree 10%
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai et al. / Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 739 - 749 740
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14
Thyme 50%Oil blend No. 2Cinnamon 20%Lemon thyme 30%Patchouli 30%Tea tree 20%Oil blend No. 3Cinnamon 23%Lavender 23%Lemon thyme 39%Thyme 15%
Tested bacterial strainsReference guidelines for culturing and
antibiotic sensitivity testing were used 5.Pathogenic Gram-positive and Gram-negativebacteria commonly found in the environmentincluding Acinetobacter baumanii, Bacillussubtilis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae,Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcusaureus were tested for their sensitivity to theessential oils. In addition, eleven clinical isolatesof MRSA and a clinical isolate MDR A. baumaniiJVC1053 were included in our study. Clincallybacterial isolates were obtained from the RegionalMedical Sciences Center, Songkla andSonklagarind Hospital, Thailand. Each bacterialstrain was suspended in Mueller Hinton broth(MHB, Difco, Detroit, USA) and incubated at37°C for 18 h. Mueller Hinton agar (MHA, Difco)was used for antibacterial assay.
Paper disc agar diffusion methodSterile filter paper discs (6 mm) were soaked
with 10 ml of each undiluted essential oil. Thedisks were applied onto the surface of MHAplates seeded with 5-h broth culture of the testedbacteria. The plates were then incubated for 18 hat 35°C. The antibacterial activity was evaluatedby measuring the diameter of inhibition zone. Theexperiments were performed in triplicate and themean of the diameters of the inhibition zoneswere recorded. Antibiotic susceptibility discsincluding amikacin, ampicillin, gentamicin,kanamycin, and tetracyline (10-30 μg) wereincorporated as control.
Vapour diffusion assayMueller Hinton agar was inoculated with 5 h
broth culture of the tested bacteria. Each essentialoil (100 μl) at its minimal concentration wasadded onto 10 mm sterile blank filter discs andsubsequently placed on the medium-free coverof each Petri dish. The Petri dishes were placedwith the lid upside down, sealed with sterileadhesive tape and incubated at 35°C for 18 h 13.Mean growth measurements were calculated fromtriplicates of each bacterial species. The effecti-veness of the essential oil was calculated bymeasuring the diameter (in mm) of the zone ofmicroorganism growth inhibition above the disc.The size of the zone with visible growth reductionaround the inhibition zone was also measured.
Determination of minimal inhibitory con-centration (MIC) and Minimal bactericidalconcentration (MBC)A modified agar microdilution method 5 was
used to determine the MIC of essential oils thatproduced inhibition zones. One microliter of anovernight culture of each bacterial strain,containing approximately 104 CFU, was appliedonto MHA supplemented with the essential oilsat concentrations ranging from undiluted oil to1:128. The plates were incubated at 35°C for 18h. Observations were performed in triplicate andthe results were expressed as the lowestconcentration of essential oils that produced acomplete suppression of colony growth, MIC.Minimal bactericidal concentration using agardilution method in petri dishes with Milliporefilter 13 was performed with the essential oils thatshowed significant efficacy against each bacterialstrain. Amikacin, ampicillin, gentamicin,kanamycin, and tetracyline (10-32 μg/ml) wereincluded as reference standards.
Applications of oil blends in a portable airconditioning prototypeOil blend was applied to the system as indicated
in the diagram (Fig. 1). Each pathogen was grownin trypticase soy broth (TSB, Difco). An aliquotof 0.01 μl of diluted inoculum (approximately104 CFU/ml) was then swabbed on trypticase soyagar (TSA, Difco). In a closed system, theportable air conditioning prototype which wasapplied with different oil blends was used tocreate an environment of each oil blend. The
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai et al. / Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 739 - 749 741
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14
petri-plates with each bacterial inoculum wereexposed to the environment created due to thevapours of each oil blend for 8h with a timeinterval of 1 h each. The bacterial numbers wereenumerated at time intervals after exposure to theoil blend of different formulas. The experimentswere performed in duplicate and the mean of thecolony counts were recorded after 24 h incubationperiod.
Results and discussionIn agar disc diffusion test (Table 1), cinnamon
was the most potent essential oil that inhibitedall pathogens, followed by lemon thyme andhoney myrtle that could affect most organisms,except Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In Contrast,lavender, geranium and tea tree oils showedmoderate inhibitory effect on most of the bacteriaand patchouli exhibited the weakest inhibition.Though fragonia seemed to possess a broad rangeof activity against most pathogens, it did notinhibit some of MRSA isolates. It is to be notedthat thyme oil produced large inhibition zonesagainst most bacteria including all drug-resistantorganisms except Klebsiella pneumoniae andPseudomonas aeruginosa. Cinnamon and lemonthyme demonstrated strong activity measured byminimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and
minimal bactericidal concentrations (Table 2). Anumber of interesting compounds including (E)-cinnamaldehyde, alcohol and acetate, R-phellandrene, and citronellal were detected incinnamon 13. Cinnamaldehyde is well-known tohave antimicrobial activity 7. Antimicrobialproperties of lemon thyme in vapour phase havealso been reported by other workers 15. Therefore,these two oils were selected as major componentsin our oil blends.
Comparison of antimicrobial activities invapour phase is quite difficult since there is nostandard method. Although there are manymethods used by different authors, not all of themare suitably adapted for fast screening of largequantities of samples. One of the most promisingmethods for this purpose seems to be diskvolatilization test. Hence, we decided to assessantimicrobial properties of each essential oil atits minimal concentration by this method. Theresults demonstrated that thyme oil possessed thebest activity, followed by lemon thyme (Table 3).Patchouli did not produce inhibition zones in anyof the pathogenic bacteria. Differences among thevolatiles in the essential oils and their hydro-phobicity may be responsible for the differencesin their antimicrobial patterns in two differenttypes of contact test. Thyme oil at absolute
Fig. 1. Diagram of a Portable Air Conditioning Prototype (A) Front view and (B) Back view
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai et al. / Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 739 - 749 742
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14
Tabl
e 1.
Ant
ibac
teri
al a
ctiv
ity te
stin
g of
ess
entia
l oils
aga
inst
pat
hoge
nic
bact
eria
by
agar
diff
usio
n m
etho
d
Bac
teri
al s
trai
nM
ean
valu
es o
f inh
ibiti
on z
ones
± st
anda
rd e
rror
s (m
m) p
rodu
ced
by e
ssen
tial o
ils (1
0 m
l/dis
c)A
FC
ZM
AM
NPA
PCT
ST
VL
A
Gra
m-p
ositi
ve b
acte
riaBa
cillu
s su
btili
s PS
SCM
I007
535
±131
±114
±113
±116
022
±828
±248
±115
±2St
aphy
loco
ccus
aur
eus A
TCC
259
2310
±134
±127
±229
±217
±229
531
±264
±018
±1M
ethi
cilli
n-re
sist
ant S
. aur
eus
(11
isol
ates
)8±
3*33
±024
±232
±222
±310
±435
258
±112
±1
Gra
m-N
egat
ive
bact
eria
Acin
etob
acte
r ba
uman
iiATC
C 1
9606
14±2
30±3
15±2
16±2
9±2
-23
±134
±014
±2M
ultid
rug-
resi
stan
t A. b
aum
anii
JVC
105
318
±229
±317
±014
±211
±4-
23±2
18±0
-Es
cher
ichi
a co
li AT
CC
259
2220
±223
±115
±112
±111
1-
19±2
32±1
22±1
Kle
bsie
lla p
neum
onia
PSSC
MI 0
031
12±1
24±2
-10
±1-
-14
±1-
12±1
Pseu
dom
onas
aer
ugin
osaP
SSC
MI 0
048
10±1
24±5
--
--
--
13±2
* =
only
9 is
olat
es d
emon
stra
ted
inhi
bitio
n zo
nes,
- = N
o in
hibi
tion
zone
;Va
lues
are
mea
n ±
S.E
AF:
Ago
nis
frag
rans
(Fra
goni
a);
CZ:
Cin
nam
omum
zey
lani
cum
(Cin
nam
on;
MA
: Mel
aleu
ca a
ltern
ifolia
(Tea
tree
);M
N: M
elal
euca
nes
ophi
la(H
oney
myr
tle);
PA: P
elar
goni
um x
asp
erum
(Ger
aniu
m);
PC: P
ogos
tem
on c
ablin
(Pat
chou
li);
TS: T
hym
us s
erpy
llum
(Lem
on th
yme)
;TV
: Thy
mus
vul
gari
s (T
hym
e);
LA: L
avan
dula
ang
ustif
olia
(Lav
ende
r);
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai et al. / Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 739 - 749 743
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14
Tabl
e 2.
Min
imal
Inh
ibiti
on C
once
ntra
tion
(MIC
) and
Min
imal
Bac
teri
cida
lC
once
ntra
tion
(MB
C) o
f Ess
entia
l Oils
on
Path
ogen
ic B
acte
ria
Bac
teri
al s
trai
nD
eter
min
atio
n of
MIC
/MB
C (d
ilutio
n)A
FC
ZM
AM
NPA
PCT
ST
VL
A
Gra
m-p
ositi
ve b
acte
riaBa
cillu
s su
btili
s1:
8/1:
161:
64/1
:64
1:8/
1:8
1:32
/1:3
21:
3/1:
321:
16/1
:81:
32/1
:32
1:16
/1:1
61:
18/1
:16
PSSC
MI 0
075
Stap
hylo
cocc
us a
ureu
s1:
8/1:
21:
64/1
:64
1:8/
1:2
1:64
/1:3
21:
16/1
:21:
4/>U
1:32
/1:3
21:
16/1
:41:
16/1
:8 A
TCC
259
23M
ethi
cilli
n-re
sist
ant S
. aur
eus
1:8/
1:4
1:64
/1:6
41:
8/1:
21:
16/1
:16
1:32
/1:1
61:
4/>U
1:32
/1:3
21:
16/1
:41:
8/1:
8N
PRC
001
Gra
m-N
egat
ive
bact
eria
Acin
etob
acte
r ba
uman
ii1:
1/1:
81:
64/1
:64
1:8/
1:8
1:16
/1:1
61:
8/1:
4N
A1:
32/1
:32
1:8/
1:8
1:16
/ 1:1
6AT
CC
196
06M
ultid
rug-
resi
stan
t1:
8/1:
41:
64/1
:64
1:16
/1:1
61:
16/1
:16
1:8/
1:8
NA
1:32
/1:3
21:
8/1:
81:
8 / 1
:4A.
bau
man
ii JV
C 1
053
Esch
eric
hia
coli
1:8/
1:8
1:64
/1:6
41:
8/1:
81:
16/1
:81:
8/1:
8N
A1:
32/1
:32
1:8/
1:8
1:16
/ 1:
16AT
CC
259
22K
lebs
iella
pne
umon
iae
1:4/
1:2
1:64
/1:3
21:
8/1:
81:
8/1:
8N
AN
A1:
16/1
:16
1:8/
1:8
1:8/
1:8
PSSC
MI 0
031
Pseu
dom
onas
aer
ugin
osa
U/>
U1:
64/1
:64
1:2/
1:2
U/>
UN
AN
A1:
16/1
:81:
2/1:
21:
4 / 1
:4PS
SCM
I004
8
NA
= N
ot a
pplic
able
,U
= u
ndilu
ted
oil.
AF:
Ago
nis
frag
rans
(Fra
goni
a);
CZ:
Cin
nam
omum
zey
lani
cum
(Cin
nam
on;
MA
: Mel
aleu
ca a
ltern
ifolia
(Tea
tree
);M
N: M
elal
euca
nes
ophi
la(H
oney
myr
tle);
PA: P
elar
goni
um x
asp
erum
(Ger
aniu
m);
PC: P
ogos
tem
on c
ablin
(Pat
chou
li);
TS: T
hym
us s
erpy
llum
(Lem
on th
yme)
;TV
: Thy
mus
vul
gari
s (T
hym
e);
LA: L
avan
dula
ang
ustif
olia
(Lav
ende
r);
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai et al. / Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 739 - 749 744
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14
Tabl
e 3.
Ant
ibac
teri
al A
ctiv
ity T
estin
g of
Ess
entia
l Oils
aga
inst
Pat
hoge
nic
Bac
teri
a in
Vap
our
Con
tact
Bact
eria
l str
ain
Mea
n va
lues
of i
nhib
ition
zone
s ± st
anda
rd er
rors
(mm
) pro
duce
d by
esse
ntia
l oils
at m
inim
al in
hibi
tion
conc
entr
atio
nA
FC
ZM
AM
NPA
PCT
ST
VL
A
Gra
m-p
ositi
ve b
acte
riaBa
cillu
s su
btili
s PS
SCM
I 007
5N
D43
±118
±1N
D40
±0-
29±3
38±0
30±2
Stap
hylo
cocc
us a
ureu
s ATC
C 2
5923
ND
--
ND
48±1
-35
±160
±318
±1M
ethi
cilli
n-re
sist
ant S
. aur
eus
(11
isol
ates
)N
D-
-N
D-
-29
±352
±312
±1
Gra
m-N
egat
ive
bact
eria
Acin
etob
acte
r ba
uman
ii AT
CC
196
06N
D30
±089
±1N
D-
-29
±140
±0-
Mul
tidru
g-re
sist
ant A
. bau
man
ii JV
C 1
053
ND
19±1
-N
D-
-18
±150
±119
±1Es
cher
ichi
a co
li AT
CC
259
22N
D22
±165
±2N
D-
-29
±185
±2-
Kle
bsie
lla p
neum
onia
e PS
SCM
I 003
1N
D-
13±0
ND
--
-33
±320
±6Ps
eudo
mon
as a
erug
inos
a PS
SCM
I 004
8N
D-
90±0
ND
--
55±2
85±2
15±1
ND
= N
ot d
eter
min
ed;
- =
No
inhi
bitio
n zo
ne;
Val
ues a
re m
ean
± S.
E,A
F: A
goni
s fr
agra
ns (F
rago
nia)
;C
Z: C
inna
mom
um z
eyla
nicu
m (C
inna
mon
;M
A: M
elal
euca
alte
rnifo
lia (T
ea tr
ee);
MN
: Mel
aleu
ca n
esop
hila
(Hon
ey m
yrtle
);PA
: Pel
argo
nium
x a
sper
um (G
eran
ium
);PC
: Pog
oste
mon
cab
lin(P
atch
ouli)
;TS
: Thy
mus
ser
pyllu
m (L
emon
thym
e);
TV: T
hym
us v
ulga
ris
(Thy
me)
;LA
: Lav
andu
la a
ngus
tifol
ia (L
aven
der)
;
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai et al. / Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 739 - 749 745
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14
concentration could not inhibit Klebsiella pneu-moniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in agardiffusion test, but the activity is enhanced invaporization assay, resulting in inhibition of allpathogenic bacteria tested, even at the MIC.
A synergistic effect on antimicrobial activitymay be produced from combinations of subs-tances. It has been recently demonstrated thatcombination of essential oils in vapour phasecould wield a synergistic effect on the inhibitionof Listeria monogenes, Bacillus cereus, andYersinia enterocolitica 9. Taken together theresults from previous experiments, we decidedto formulate oil blends. According to the resultsobtained in Table 4 and Table 5, oil blends No. 2and 3 were further selected to incorporate in ourportable air conditioning prototype. Antibacterialefficacy in the atmosphere generated by selectedoil blends in our invented air conditioning systemwas assessed. Exposure of bacterial colonies tothe system resulted in a marked decrease incounts, especially with the Gram-positive bacteria(Fig. 2). Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative
bacteria demonstrated noticeably smaller size intheir colony appearance towards the end of thefirst hour. This was due to cells being injured fromvaporization. Oils in the vapour phase wereshown to have significant antimicrobial activity.Thus, the vapour-phase approach appears to bepromising as a control protocol and could beapplied in the ventilation, creating a protectiveatmosphere with no risk effects from chemicals.
In conclusion, our results demonstrated that thisair conditioning prototype, incorporated with oilblend No. 2 is of advantage in preventingspreading of infections.
Its application is useful, especially for use inrisk environment such as hospital wards, theatres,conference rooms and other public spaces.
AcknowledgementsAuthors are grateful to The Australian Trade
Commission, Thailand. This work was supportedby the Thailand Research Fund, Fiscal year 2012-2014.
Time (hours)
Num
ber o
f col
onie
s (C
FU)
Num
ber o
f col
onie
s (C
FU)
Time (hours)
Fig. 2. Antibacterial efficacy of oil blends in air conditioning prototype. During the first hour,all bacteria demonstrated noticeably smaller size in their colony appearance. Reduction in numbersof colony counts: Bacillus subtilis ( ), Staphylococcus aureus ( ), methicillin-resistant S. aureus( ), Acinetobacter baumanii ( ), multidrug-resistant A. baumanii ( ), Escherichia coli ( ),Klebsiella pneumoniae (Δ), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Ο) after incorporation of oil blend No. 2(cinnamon 20%, lemon thyme 30%, patchouli 30%, tea tree 20%) (A) and oil blend No. 3 (cinnamon23%, lavender 23%, lemon thyme 39%, thyme 15%) (B).
(A) (B)
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai et al. / Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 739 - 749 746
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14
Tabl
e 4.
Ant
ibac
teri
al a
ctiv
ity te
stin
g of
ble
nded
ess
entia
l oils
aga
inst
pat
hoge
nic
bact
eria
by
agar
diff
usio
n m
etho
d
Bac
teri
al s
trai
nM
ean
valu
es o
f inh
ibiti
on z
ones
± s
tand
ard
erro
rs (m
m) p
rodu
ced
by b
lend
ed o
ils (1
0 m
l/dis
c)O
il bl
end
1O
il bl
end
2O
il bl
end
3(C
inna
mon
10%
,(C
inna
mon
20%
,(C
inna
mon
23%
,G
eran
ium
30%
,L
emon
thym
e 30
%,
Lav
ende
r 23
%,
Tea
Tree
10%
, P
atch
ouli
30%
,L
emon
thym
e 39
%,
Thy
me
50%
)Te
a tr
ee 2
0%)
Thy
me
15%
)
Gra
m-p
ositi
ve b
acte
riaBa
cillu
s su
btili
s PS
SCM
I 007
529
±124
±125
±1St
aphy
loco
ccus
aur
eus A
TCC
259
2331
±129
±128
±1M
ethi
cilli
n-re
sist
ant S
. aur
eus
(11
isol
ates
)24
±119
±125
±1
Gra
m-N
egat
ive
bact
eria
Acin
etob
acte
r ba
uman
ii AT
CC
196
0620
±123
±123
±1M
ultid
rug-
resi
stan
t A. b
aum
anii
JVC
105
318
±122
±122
±1Es
cher
ichi
a co
li AT
CC
259
2216
±116
±120
±1K
lebs
iella
pne
umon
iae
PSSC
MI 0
031
11±1
15±1
-Ps
eudo
mon
as a
erug
inos
a PS
SCM
I 004
810
±121
±110
±1
Valu
es a
re m
ean
±S.E
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai et al. / Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 739 - 749 747
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14
Tabl
e 5.
Min
imal
inhi
bitio
n co
ncen
trat
ion
(MIC
) and
min
imal
bac
teri
cida
lco
ncen
trat
ion
(MB
C) o
f ble
nded
oils
aga
inst
pat
hoge
nic
bact
eria
Bac
teri
al s
trai
nD
eter
min
atio
n of
MIC
/MB
C (d
ilutio
n)O
il bl
end
1O
il bl
end
2O
il bl
end
3(C
inna
mon
10%
,(C
inna
mon
20%
,(C
inna
mon
23%
,G
eran
ium
30%
,L
emon
thym
e 30
%,
Lav
ende
r 23
%,
Tea
Tree
10%
, P
atch
ouli
30%
,L
emon
thym
e 39
%,
Thy
me
50%
)Te
a tr
ee 2
0%)
Thy
me
15%
)
Gra
m-p
ositi
ve b
acte
riaBa
cillu
s su
btili
s PS
SCM
I 007
51:
16/1
:16
1:32
/1:3
21:
32/1
:16
Stap
hylo
cocc
us a
ureu
s ATC
C 2
5923
1:32
/1:8
1:64
/1:3
21:
16/1
:16
Met
hici
llin-
resi
stan
t S.a
ureu
s N
PRC
001
1:16
/1:8
1:16
/1:1
61:
16/1
:32
Gra
m-N
egat
ive
bact
eria
Acin
etob
acte
r ba
uman
ii AT
CC
196
061:
16/1
:81:
16/1
:16
1:32
/1:1
6M
ultid
rug-
resi
stan
t A. b
aum
anii
JVC
105
31:
16/1
:81:
16/1
:16
1:16
/1:1
6Es
cher
ichi
a co
li AT
CC
259
221:
8/1:
81:
16/1
:81:
16/1
:16
Kle
bsie
lla p
neum
onia
PSS
CM
I 003
11:
8/1:
81:
8/1:
81:
4/1:
2Ps
eudo
mon
as a
erug
inos
a PS
SCM
I 004
81:
4/>U
1:2/
1:2
1:8/
1:2
U =
und
ilute
d oi
l.
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai et al. / Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 739 - 749 748
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14
References1. Biedenbach, D.J., Bell, J.M., Sader, H.S., Fritsche, T.R., Jones, R.N. and Turnidge, J.D.
(2007). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-positive bacterial isolates from the Asia-Pacificregion and an in vitro evaluation of the bactericidal activity of daptomycin, vancomycin, andteicoplanin: a SENTRY Program Report (2003-2004). Int. J. Antimicrob Agents. 30: 143-149.
2. Burt, S. (2004). Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods- a review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 94: 223-253.
3. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). (2002). Staphylococcus aureus resistantto vancomycin-United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 51: 565-567.
4. Choi, J.Y., Park, Y.S., Kim, C.O., Park, Y.S., Yoon, H.J., Shin, S.Y., Kim, Y.A., Song, Y.G.,Yong, D., Lee, K. and Kim, J.M. (2005). Mortality risk factors of Acinetobacter baumanniibacteraemia. Intern. Med. J. 35: 599-603.
5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). (2009). M02-A10-Performance Standardsfor Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, Approved Standard, 10th edn; and M07-A8-Methodsfor Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that grow aerobically, ApprovedStandard, 8th edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, U.S.A.
6. Emaneini, M., Aligholi, M., Hashemi, F.B., Jabalameli, F., Shahsavan, S., Dabiri, H., Jonaidi,N. and Dahi, K. (2007). Isolation of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a teachinghospital in Tehran. J. Hosp. Infect. 66: 92-93.
7. Friedman, M., Kozukue, N. and Harden, L.A. (2000). Cinnamaldehyde content in foods deter-mined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48: 5702-5709.
8. Giamarellou, H., Antoniadou, A. and Kanellakopoulou, K. (2008). Acinetobacter baumannii:a universal threat to public health? Int. J. Antimicrob Agents. 32: 106-119.
9. Goñi, P., López, P., Sánchez, C., Gómez-Lus, R., Becerril, R. and Nerín, C. (2009). Anti-microbial activity in the vapour phase of a combination of cinnamon and clove essential oils.Food Chem. 116: 982-989.
10. Holley, R.A. and Patel, D. (2005). Improvement in shelf-life and safety of perishable foods byplant essential oils and smoke antimicrobials. Food Microbiol. 22: 273-292.
11. Kordali, S., Kotan, R., Mavi, A., Cakir, A., Ala, A. and Yildirim, A. (2005). Determination ofthe chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the essential oil of Artemisia dracunculusand of the antifungal and antibacterial activities of Turkish Artemisia absinthium, A. dracunculus,Artemisia santonicum, and Artemisia spicigera essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53: 9452-9458.
12. Lee, N.Y., Lee, H.C., Ko, N.Y., Chang, C.M., Shih, H.I., Wu, C.J. and Ko, W.C. (2007).Clinical and economic impact of multidrug resistance in nosocomial Acinetobacter baumanniibacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 28: 713-719.
13. Lopez, P., Sanchez, C., Batlle, R. and Nerin, C. (2005). Solid- and vapor-phase antimicrobialactivities of six essential oils: Susceptibility of selected foodborne bacterial and fungal strains.J. Agric. Food Chem. 53: 6939-6946.
14. Maragakis, L.L. and Perl, T.M. (2008). Acinetobacter baumannii: Epidemiology, antimicrobialresistance, and treatment options. Clin. Infect Dis. 46: 1254-1263.
15. Nedorostova, L., Kloucek, P., Kokoska, L., Stolcova, M. and Pulkrabek, J. (2009). Anti-microbial properties of selected essential oils in vapour phase against foodborne bacteria. FoodControl. 20: 157-160.
16. Penalver, P., Huerta, B., Borge, C., Astorga, R., Romero, R. and Perea, A. (2005). Anti-microbial activity of five essential oils against origin strains of the Enterobacteriaceae family.APMIS. 113: 1-6.
17. Pezo, D., Salafranca, J. and Nerin, C. (2006). Design of a method for generation of gas-phasehydroxyl radicals, and use of HPLC with fluorescence detection to assess the antioxidant capacityof natural essential oils. Anal Bioanal Chem. 385: 1241-1246.
18. Tripathi, P. and Dubey, N.K. (2004). Exploitation of natural products as an alternative strategyto control postharvest fungal rotting of fruit and vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 32: 235-245.
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai et al. / Jeobp 15 (5) 2012 739 - 749 749
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
4:04
21
Nov
embe
r 20
14