Misled on YVR Alternatives - Supporting Records from MLA Vicki Huntington
-
Upload
vickihuntingtondelta -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Misled on YVR Alternatives - Supporting Records from MLA Vicki Huntington
8/13/2019 Misled on YVR Alternatives - Supporting Records from MLA Vicki Huntington
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/misled-on-yvr-alternatives-supporting-records-from-mla-vicki-huntington 1/6
Vancouver Airport Fuel Facilities Corporationc/o FSM Management Group Inc
Suite 103 -12300 Horseshoe.Way
Richmonl1 B.C. Canada V7A 4Z1
Phone: (604) 271-7113
Fax: {604) 271·8006
January 17, 2012
Carrie Brown, PGeo.
Manager, Environmental Programs
Port Metro Vancouver
100 The Pointe, 999 Canada Place
Vancouver, BC
V6C3T4
Dear Ms. Brown:
Re: PMV Comments, VAFD Project, Agency and First Nations Tracking Table (November 18, 2011
Version)- Proponent Responses
8/13/2019 Misled on YVR Alternatives - Supporting Records from MLA Vicki Huntington
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/misled-on-yvr-alternatives-supporting-records-from-mla-vicki-huntington 2/6
• Contaminant Risk Potential: We appreciate PMV s comments on the Screening Level Contaminated
Sites A s s e s s m e n ~ In particular the Identification of a site wlth known contamination. This
·information· is useful and will assist with th management ·of contaminated sites in the Construction
.Environmental Management Plan to be developed prior to the start ofconstruction. This plan will
be provided to PMV.and EAO for review.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or clarifications regarding our responses.
You can reach me at 604 271 7113.
Sincerely,
Vancouver Airport uel Facilities Corporation
Adrian Pollard P.Eng.
Project Director
8/13/2019 Misled on YVR Alternatives - Supporting Records from MLA Vicki Huntington
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/misled-on-yvr-alternatives-supporting-records-from-mla-vicki-huntington 3/6
Appendix A to the 1 January 2012 letter from VAFFC to Carrie Brown (PMV}
Comment Theme PMVComment Proponent Response
I'D#3g Project PMV reserves comm ent until we have had an Noted. VAFFC voluntarily engaged two consulting firms,
Alternatives opportunity to review the options analysis that Gold er Associates and Ausenco-Sandwell, both with
VAFFC has completed or at least until we have extensive marine and environm-ental engineering
received a compelling rationale for not selecting either experience, to jointly undertake a more detailed and
the single point mooring and deep water terminal independent comparative analysisof hese and other
alternatives . Please advise when the analysis report or Project delivery alternatives. Early in this Project review,
rationale wHJ be available. We anticipate that VAFFC both the EAO and CEA Agency clarified that the review of
will provide a copy i r ~ l y to PMV when submitting alternative projects was not within the scope of this
this to the EAO. Project review. We commissioned the study to respond to
the public interest in more informatio n on the selection of
the current project for review. The EAO has not
requested this further study, nor has t been filed as part
of he record for review of his Project. A copy of the
report has been forwarde d for your nformation.
3h Project Same comment as for #3g above. See the response provided to Comment #3g.
Alternatives
3m First Nations PMV will provide comment in respect of he draft First We understand that PMV are discussing this topic ·
Interests Nations Consultation Summary Report under separate internally with some areas requ iring clarifications. We
cover. look forward to receJving PMV's comments, but note that
this topic is best addressed between PMV and the EAO.
3p First Nations PMV wiiJ provide comment in respect of he draft First See the response provided to Comment #3m.
Consultation Nations Consultation Summary Report under separate
cover.
3q Consultation Given that the EA is a harmonized provincial and Pre-Application informa tion distrib ution and consultation
federa l process, the First Nations, municipal and public with government, First Nations and the public is detailed
8/13/2019 Misled on YVR Alternatives - Supporting Records from MLA Vicki Huntington
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/misled-on-yvr-alternatives-supporting-records-from-mla-vicki-huntington 4/6
TRACKING DATE OF AGENCY/ SUBJECT AREA COMMENTS/ ISSUES ON THE PROPOSED PROJECT S dAIR PROPONENT{VAFFC) RESPONSES
No. COMMENTS AUTHORITY / fiRST
NAnON PROVIDING
COMMENTS (COMMENTS ON THE dAIR REV .O, OCTOBER 20, 2009) (RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON TH dAIR REV.O
(COMMENTS ONTHEdAIR REV.1 , MARCH 17, 2010) (RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE dAIR REV .
{COMMENTS ON THEdAIR REV.2 , JULY 27 , 2010) (RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON TH dAIR REV .2
03/SEP/10 Voncouvcl'Fraser Pooe I. second bulle t -
Port Aulhorily
• .... key stakeholders and regulatory agendasand ou lhorlnes {recanmand oddlng • Acl<nowlooged. change s now reflectedIn 1he AIR
S001een Suszezwlez. -cod g ultlalties since VFPA Is not on agency) .
Senlof PtonnC H
Pooo secQOd o g rogm ph 1roderVfPA
• tho proposed morioo terminal tJpgrodes ore nor on Poet property and would notbe • Acknowlcdgod. This change is oow eflected n 100 AJR
part of the Port's dovelopmenr opptov al process. .e. PMV would ootbe ssuing adevelOPment petmit foe marine temino1wales
Sl 22/JAN/10 vancouverFraser Evoluo tiooo f Pog 45 S.ctlon 3.2.1 of the Content Regulce.,...nts fot ttle AQQ:Iicotion Document: • Sec-tion 2 6: Alternative Meansof Undertaking the Propo
Port Authority Altemotlves Projectof the Application wOI describe the alternative
• PJtematlves evo luoted should nclude olt not ust the ones descrlbed in the options means of carrying out the project os described under h
Sharieen Suszezwiez. evauolloo memo os being most wodhy of consideration. Those "not worthy" con CEAA. Subsection 2.3.4: Fuel Delivery System Options of
SeniorP onnet po<slbly be reo<liydismissed but shou ld oeve<theies< be dentified. reviseddAI Rspecifies that the Application will indude obrief dlscvssionof oil po tential options consldeted leodn
UO IO thO O<OOOSed Proiecl
8/13/2019 Misled on YVR Alternatives - Supporting Records from MLA Vicki Huntington
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/misled-on-yvr-alternatives-supporting-records-from-mla-vicki-huntington 5/6
TRACKING DATE OF AGENCY / SUBJECT AREA COMMENTS / ISSUES ON THE PROPOSED PROJECT SdAIR PROPONENT VAFFC) RESPONSES
N o. COMMENTS AUTHORITY / fiRST
NAnON PROVIDING
COMMENTS (COMMENTS ON THE dAIR REV .O, OCTOBER 20, 2009) (RESPONSESTO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE dAIR REV.
(COMMENTSONTHEdAIR R£V.1, MARCH 17. 2010) (RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE dAIR REV .
(COMMENTS ON THEdAIR REV.2, JULY 27, 2010) (RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECElVED ON THE dAIR REV.
07/APR/10 voncouvef Ai port • The dAJR shouki out11ne plonned pubSc CC1n lilfotlon rather than waiting for the • See ptevlousresponseAuthotlly oppficotfoo. Attematlvely, VAFFC ond EAO should J)r epore o pu k coosultotioo
Simon R o ~ n s o n plan
Environmento1Speclollst
6 22/JAN/10 Vancouver Akport Project • Alternatives- The re-Aew of oltemotfvesdescribed the dAJR (Pages 45 46)does • Sec-Hon 2.6: AlternativeMeansof Undertoldng the Propo
Authority Altet notlves not soundany mote comprehensive than already ptovidedby VAfFC n pte- ProjKtof the revised dAIR specifies the scope of the
Simon R o ~ n s o n application nformodoo. This s a topic that ihouki be d isetJSSed with.other oltematlvemeansof carrying out the project as describ
Environmental ogendes a nd the TWG prior to inollling 1M AIR under he CEAA. The AppHco11onwMdescribeand asse
Speclollsl the ptoposed Project. not otlemotive projects, consistenwith the ptoclice under he 8CEAA and the CEAA
8/13/2019 Misled on YVR Alternatives - Supporting Records from MLA Vicki Huntington
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/misled-on-yvr-alternatives-supporting-records-from-mla-vicki-huntington 6/6
TRACKING DATE OF AGENCY/ SUBJECT AtEA COMMENTS/ISSUES ON THE PROPOSED PROJECT'S dAIR PROPONENT {VAFFC) RESPONSES
No. COMMENTS AUTHORITY fiRST
NAnON PROVIDING
COMMENTS (COMMENTS ON THE dAIR REV .O, OCTOBER 20, 2009) (RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE dAIR REV.
(COMMENTS ON THE dAIR R£v.1, MARCH 17, 2010) (RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE dAIR REY .
(COMMENTS ON TilE dAIR REY.2 , JUlY 27, 2010) (RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEI VED ON THE dAIR REV .
68 26/JAN/10 Clly of Richmond fire Suppression . Richmond Fife Rescue does not hove capacity nor appropriate equiptnent to • Choptet18 : Fire hev•ntlon, Prepcwedrwtss ond Emet genJohn Irving, And safely conduct shipboard tlreftghting and there isno waterside ire fighting Responseof the ce'vised dAIR spedf.es thot the Applicat
Director, Engineering Are Rgh l lng capability on the South Aim . Rlchmooo Rre Rescue emergency response lime to will nclude detailed nfoonotion and definition of the
Copobi ly the proposed tonk orm site is ovet nine minutes. which k not conducive to specific fire suppr-ession systems r SQfutioos that wll be Icontrollinga fire In thisOrigin.Considering that the City or any other agency cannot place to address the tire hazard potentioJ ptesented by
ptovide adequate ~ t f l g h t i n g covetoge to the proposed tetmiOO o.nd tonk c:rm proposed Project nfrosttuc turesites. VAFFC must provide detailed nformation ond defirirfon of specific tire
suppcession systems t solutioos that will be n ploc& to oddt'ess fire hazcwd
69 26/JAN/10 Cily of Richmond O p ~ o o s Analysis • Provide on onotysls that evaluateseach optionwith consistentcriterlo (e.g. • Section 2.6: Altemoflve Meansof Undertaking the Propo
John Irving. tooestrlol ond oquotlc habitat mpacts, risk analysis. CO tS etc .) The assess.men1 Project of the revised dAIR specifies OO scope of the
Oiteclor, tnglneenng curreotty ocks transparency of av olvolion from ons option to another. Mooy oltetnatlvemoonsof carrying out the project as describ
options ore sited to have seismiccholeoges yet there Is no modelling f consistent undef CEAA. The Application will descr1be cod assess th
opplicofioo of sdeoce Or engineering/technical r1g0Uf' to determine the true proposed Project. oot oJternotfve pcojects, consistent wi
nature of the sel.stnic ssue the ptoctlce under BCEAAand CEAA.
• M ocknowledged by the EAO In the December2009TW
meeting, VAFFC voluntarily provided lnformolion to the
IWG on he dentificotlon and evoluo lionof the venous
delivety system options. Andyslsof alternative project
moons has been o m ~ e t e d : modelling s not arequkement of egutototy outhorilies. Subsec-tion 2.3.-4:DeliverySystem Options of the revised dAIR spedflos th
the Applicationwil .oclude o brief discussion poteoptions coosidered leading up to the pcoposed Projec t
12/APR/10 Clly of Richmond . The pcoponent has ooi adequa tely demonstrated to the City that there ore no . AS noted o·bOve. the Applic-ation wnt describe and asses
John Irving, othet viable options to the-South Arm tertrinol option presented for evaluation . the ptopos&d Project, not o1temottve p(ojects, consistenOitector, Engineenng with the pcoctice under he 8CEAA and the CEAA
02/SEP/10 City of Richmond . Nol soti.sfoctorily resolved. TOO City of Richmond's Council rosotution is reiterated . VAfFC Is ow we of tOO City of R'ich.mond'sCouncil rosolu
John iVing, here os folows: with respect to the ptoposed Ptojoct VAfFC will contin
Ditec1or. Engineering Apl'fl26. 2010 Council Agendo Item u m b e ~ 9 · VANCOUVER AJRPOR FU L OEUVERY to wort:: ond consult with the City thtough the
PROJECT envb'onmonta1 assessment review pr-ocoss in occotdonc
Resolution Number RtOn-s with the BCEAA ond the CEAA e q u i r e m eResolution tt wos moved and seconded:
That theOiy of Richmond odvise the 8C Environmental ASSessment Office and the
v >J'FC o f the follow'ong:
(I) fhotln o nv new J•t uel supplysystems to the Voocouvet nternotioool Airport
Richmond Counci l is strongly oppos-ed to:
(al on off.J.ooding fo lity on the south Om l of the Froser Rivet:(b} o new •t fuel loo through Richmond farmland o.nd urban oreos of Richmond:
ond
(c) any nc roose In the numberof rl.Jcks canyiog tuel on City s1reers.