mishkin_194195_ppt21
-
Upload
vetushi123 -
Category
Documents
-
view
12 -
download
1
description
Transcript of mishkin_194195_ppt21
Chapter 21
Monetary Policy Strategy: The International Experience
© 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 21-2
Role of a Nominal Anchor
Ties Down Expectations
Helps Avoid Time-Consistency Problem1. Arises from pursuit of short-term goals which lead
to bad long-term outcomes
2. Time-consistency resides more in political process
3. Nominal anchor limits political pressure for time-consistency
© 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 21-3
Exchange-Rate Targeting
Advantages1. Fixes for internationally traded goods
2. Anchors expectations
3. Automatic rule, avoids time-consistency
4. Easy to understand: “sound currency” as rallying cry
5. Helps economic integration
6. Successful in reducing
France, UK, Mexico
© 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 21-4
Exchange-Rate Targeting
Disadvantages1. Loss of independent monetary policy
Problems after German reunification: UK, French monetary policy too tight
2. Open to speculative attacksEurope, Sept. 1992; Mexico: 1994; Asia: 1997
3. Successful speculative attack disastrous for emerging market countries because it leads to financial crisis
4. Weakened accountability: lose exchange-rate signal
21-5
Currency Boards vs. Dollarization
Currency Boards1. Domestic currency exchanged at fixed rate for foreign currency
automatically2. Fixed exchange rate with very strong commitment mechanism
and no discretion3. Usual disadvantages of fixed exchange rate4. Still subject to speculative attack5. Lose ability to have lender of last resort
Dollarization1. Even stronger commitment mechanism2. No possibility of speculative attack3. Usual disadvantages of fixed exchange rtae4. Lose seignorage
© 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 21-6
Summary: Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Monetary Policy Strategies
© 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 21-7
Summary: Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Monetary Policy Strategies
21-8
Monetary TargetingCanada
1. Targets M1 till 1982, then abandons it2. 1988: declining targets, M2 as guide
United Kingdom1. Targets M3 and later M02. Problems of M as monetary indicator
Japan1. Forecasts M2 + CDs2. Innovation and deregulation makes less useful as monetary
indicator3. High money growth 1987-1989: “bubble economy,” then tight money
policyGermany and Switzerland
1. Not monetarist rigid rule2. Targets using M0 and M3: changes over time3. Allows growth outside target for 2-3 years, but then reverses
overshoots4. Key elements: flexibility, transparency, and accountability
© 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 21-9
Monetary Targeting
Advantages1. Able to cope with domestic considerations2. Signals are immediate3. Immediate accountability of central bank
Disadvantages1. Big if: all advantages require reliable relationship
between goal and targeted aggregate2. In many countries, weak relationship between
goal and M-aggregatePoor communications device and accountability
© 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 21-10
Inflation Targeting
Five Elements1. Public announcement of medium-term -
target
2. Institutional commitment to price stability
3. Information inclusive strategy
4. Increased transparency through public communication
5. Increased accountability
21-11
Inflation Targeting in New Zealand, Canada, and the UK
© 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 21-12
Inflation Targeting
Advantages1. Allows focus on domestic considerations
2. Not dependent on reliable relationship between M-aggregate and inflation
3. Readily understood by public
4. Reduce political pressures for time-consistent policy
5. Focus on transparency and communication
6. Increased accountability of central bank
7. Performance good: and e , and stays low in business cycle upturn
© 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 21-13
Inflation Targeting
Disadvantages1. Delayed signalling2. Too much rigidity3. Potential for increased output fluctuations4. Low economic growth
Nominal GDP Targeting1. Close to inflation targeting with concern about
output fluctuations2. Problem of announcing specific target for real
GDP growth3. Harder for public to understand
© 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 21-14
Monetary Policy with an Implicit Nominal Anchor
Forward-Looking and Preemptive to Deal With Long Lags
Advantages1. Focus on domestic considerations
2. Has worked very well in the U.S.
3. If It Ain’t Broke Why Fix It?
Disadvantages1. Lack of transparency and accountability
2. Dependence on personalities
3. Inconsistent with democratic principles