Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016...

20
1 Minutes of the 98 th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority held on. 05 th December, 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006. The full Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter No. 967-969 dated 30.11.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:- Item No.[1]Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical University” located at Village NunaMajra, District Jhajjar, Haryana by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust. This case was considered in the 96 th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.09.2016 and the case was deferred with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit MOU with authorized Bio-Medical Waste Management Agency. The project proponent on 28.10.2016 submitted the reply which was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the Bio-Medical Waste Management Agency contracted by project proponent has only applied for Environment Clearance. As per the Common Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facility Guidelines issued by Central Pollution Control Board on dated 12.07.2016 at para no. 5.2 is clearly mentioned that the CBWTF operator is also required to obtain “Environmental Clearance (EC)” from the respective SEIAA or Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change (MoEF & CC). Until or unless EC is not obtained by the Bio-Medical Waste Management Agency, the same cannot transport/dispose the Bio-medical/Hazardous Waste. In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with decision that project proponent should either submit the MOU agency which has EC or shall have in-house facility as per para 5.2 of CPCB Guidelines. Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex at Village-Naknaula, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Deepanshu Projects Pvt. Ltd. This case was considered in the 95 th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016 and the case was deferred with the following observations: [1] Different figures of built up area has been given in Form I and presentation copy. The project proponent is required to clarify the exact proposed built up area of existing project, proposed under expansion and total built up area after expansion.

Transcript of Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016...

Page 1: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

1

Minutes of the 98th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority

held on. 05thDecember, 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS

(Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana,

Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification

dated 14.9.2006.

The full Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for

Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter

No. 967-969 dated 30.11.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-

Item No.[1]Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical

University” located at Village NunaMajra, District Jhajjar, Haryana

by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.

This case was considered in the 96th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.09.2016 and

the case was deferred with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit

MOU with authorized Bio-Medical Waste Management Agency. The project proponent on 28.10.2016 submitted the reply which was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the Bio-Medical Waste

Management Agency contracted by project proponent has only applied for Environment

Clearance. As per the Common Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facility Guidelines issued

by Central Pollution Control Board on dated 12.07.2016 at para no. 5.2 is clearly

mentioned that the CBWTF operator is also required to obtain “Environmental Clearance

(EC)” from the respective SEIAA or Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change

(MoEF & CC). Until or unless EC is not obtained by the Bio-Medical Waste

Management Agency, the same cannot transport/dispose the Bio-medical/Hazardous

Waste.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with

decision that project proponent should either submit the MOU agency which has EC or

shall have in-house facility as per para 5.2 of CPCB Guidelines.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex

at Village-Naknaula, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Deepanshu

Projects Pvt. Ltd.

This case was considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016 and

the case was deferred with the following observations:

[1] Different figures of built up area has been given in Form I and presentation copy.

The project proponent is required to clarify the exact proposed built up area of

existing project, proposed under expansion and total built up area after expansion.

Page 2: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

2

[2] The project proponent is required to give proper information of point no, 8.3 of

Form IA.

[3] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the

seasons.

[4] The use of 24.3 KL of treated water for DG cooling per day is not justifiable. The

water requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of

water lost due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily to the

extent it is evaporation. The project proponent is required to properly calculate the

water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed formula and resubmit the

revised treated water requirement for DG cooling and also revised water

balance diagram.

[5] The project proponent has proposed to use 90 KLD of treated water for

landscaping which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water

requirement for horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram.

[6] It has been proposed to discharge 208 KLD of treated water to public

sewer/tankers. The project proponent is required submit copies of EDC/IDC paid

up to date, carrying capacity of sewer line and location of public sewer on plan.

[7] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC

shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the

SEIAA within 15 days.

The project proponent submitted the reply on 07.09.2016 and the sub-committee

on 07.09.2016 submitted the site visit report. In view of the report submitted, the

Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment

Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions in practice.

Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony

located at Village-Sahbajpur Khalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari,

Haryana by M/S Jai Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.

This case was considered in the 97th meeting of SEIAA held on 07.10.2016 and

the case was deferred.

The project proponent on 07.11.2016 submitted the reply which was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting and it was further found that the reply submitted are

incomplete and the Authority decided defer the case with the following observations.

[1] The project proponent shall submit water balance diagram, Annex.2 Fig 2(a), 260

KLD of treated water may be required initially and 14 KLD from Cooling tower

would remain in circuit, hence 246 KLD would be required next time.

[2] 500KVA DG air cooled may be installed to conserve water.

[3] The project proponent shall submit the location of the “Cooling Tower” on plan.

Observation 4 is regarding location of cooling tower of DG sets not for DG sets.

Page 3: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

3

[4] Water getting evaporated is 3KLD from cooling of DG sets but diesel required is

just 1000lts/day, both are dependent on running hours of DG sets, may be

mismatch explained.

[5] Safety measures taken for the transportation &storage of Diesel, be discussed.

Quantity given may be revised.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above

raised observation within 15 days period.

Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for proposed Multilevel car parking project

at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s International Infrabuild Pvt.

Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to

stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Multilevel car parking

project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:

Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

1. Plot area 7769.95sqm. (1.92 Acres)

2. Built up area 32122.98 sqm

3. Nos. of Floors 2 Basements + GF + 4 Floors

4. Nos. of DU General 1032, EWS 183 , Service personal

108

5. Height 28.3 Meter

6. Green belt 21.5%

7. Water requirement 120 KLD

8. Fresh Water 73 KLD

9. Waste Water 104 KLD

10. STP Capacity 125 KLD

11. Power Requirement 1397 KW DHBVN

12 Solid Waste 136 kg/day (OWC proposed for 68 kg/day)

13. Parking 995 ECS

14. RWH 4 pits

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of

water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-

involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,

parking plan, traffic circulation etc.

After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the

recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing

the usual conditions in practice.

Page 4: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

4

Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Affordable Group

Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s RMG Developers Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to

stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed of “Affordable Group

Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:

Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

1. Plot area 20,234.25 sqm (5.0 acre)

2. Built up area 50910.454 sqmt

3. License Valid up to 08.10.2020

4. Nos. of Plots 6 towers, GF+ 10 Floors, Anganwadi cum

Crech, Commercial & Community Hall

5. Nos. of DU 724 units

6. Height 32.35 Meter

7. Green belt 20.57%

8. Water requirement 525 KLD

9. Fresh Water 330 KLD

10. Waste Water 430 KLD

11. STP Capacity 520 KLD

12 Power Requirement 2780 KVADHBVN

13. Solid Waste 1682 kg/day (OWC 1177 kg/day)

14. ECS 1093 ECS

15. RWH 05 pits

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of

water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-

involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,

parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] Capacity of DG sets not matching p.g no.36 v/s 42

[2] Water trough may be provided at entry & exit of project so that air borne pollution

which emanates from vehicular activities may be reduced during the construction

phase

[3] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture & Cooling Tower citing reference of

MoEF guidelines, may the recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be

incorporated ( Table 2.4)

[4] Shown 198 KLD of treated water to be discharged in sewer, location & carrying

capacity of Sewer.

[5] Incorporating the above written observations, the project proponent is required to

submit the water balance diagram for all the seasons.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above

raised observation within 15 days period.

Page 5: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

5

Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Motel with Banquet”

project (5.323 acres) at Village Bohrakhurd, Tehsil & District

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bestech Motels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s

meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,

green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of

Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic

circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] Pg. no. 33, per capita demand of water for guest rooms & villas is 320lts & 200lts

per day, on what basis PP has arrived on this quantity, explain

[2] Asking for 15 lts/meal/person extra, on what basis

[3] Asking for 26.13 KLD of fresh water taking 2600 persons for banquet hall/ spa

etc. etc., how did PP arrive on such a high fig.

[4] 40,000Lts/day fresh water for Laundry purposes, explain.

[5] 10KLD fresh water for swimming pool, to replenish or replace? Area & location

of pool on layout to be shown.

[6] 10KLD of fresh water for Filter Backwash, why treated water cannot be used for

Backwash &means of disposal water being used in Filter Backwash , explain.

[7] Location, size & capacity of HVAC cooling tower, needing 151,000lts per day for

replenishment, explain.

[8] Pg.no. 35, Measures to be undertaken to reduce water demand during construction

phase, while part OC has been provided, showing some % of construction is

complete still needing 50,000lts water per day for construction, explain.

[9] Pg.no.43; Location of OWC & composting pit on Lay-out to be shown.

[10] Pg. no. 42: Solid waste generation for hotel rooms is 1.0Kg/person/day & for fixed

population 0.1Kg/person/day, why this anomaly, explain.

[11] Pg. no. 54, diesel consumption 700lts/hr., DG sets meant for stand-by operations,

even if have to run for 4hrs a day need 2800lts diesel per day; storage facility &

the safety measures undertaken.

[12] The water consumption quantity seems to be very much on higher side, PP is

asked to re-submit the water balance diagram for all the three seasons and

accordingly be intimated to CGWB.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above

raised observation within 15 days period.

Page 6: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

6

Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing colony at

village Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Sterling

Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to

stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “expansion of Group

Housing colony at village Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana as under:

Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

1. Plot area 70541.654 sqm. (17.43 Acres)

2. Built up area Existing 140314.966 sqm

Expansion 29597.345 sqm

Total -169912.215 sqm

3. License Valid up to 13.08.2019

4. Nos. of floors &

Blocks

Existing -14 blocks, Basement + GF +14

Floors.

Expansion -2 blocks

Total – 16 Blocks

5. Nos. of Service Units 940 DU + 167 EWS +95 Servant units

6. Height 44.5 Meter

7. Green belt 30%

8. Water requirement 960 KLD

9. Fresh Water 544 KLD

10. Waste Water 714 KLD

11. STP Capacity 960 KLD (parcel A-600 KLD & parcel B-

360 KLD)

12 Power Requirement 8956 KW DHBVN

13. Solid Waste 2735 kg/day (2 nos. of OWC proposed for

1915 kg/day)

14. ECS 1692 ECS

15. RWH 17 pits

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of

water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-

involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,

parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of re-validated license.

[2] Water trough may be provided at entry & exit of project so that air borne pollution

which emanates from vehicular activities may be reduced during the construction

phase, no separate need of water for Tyre washing this way.

[3] 275 KLD (p.g.no. 28) would be discharged in sewer location & carrying capacity

of sewer.

[4] Fig mis-match p.g no. 28/40 v/s 41 pt.2.13.

Page 7: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

7

[5] To conserve water during Curing of Concrete Jute sacks may be used which may

provide moist conditions to the concrete for longer duration by retaining water

[6] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture citing reference of MoEF guidelines,

may the recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be incorporated ( Table 2.4)

[7] Pt.5.1.2 Water Conservation Measures to be incorporated still 135 lpd per capita

water requirement, explain . A new Water Balance diagram taking care of the

above observations for all the three seasons be submitted.

[8] Plantation plan to be shown on lay-out depicting 1255 no. of trees with a canopy

area of 25 sq. mt.

[9] Pg. no. 268, Area required for storage & management of solid waste 645.66 sq.

mt. location on lay- out plan be shown.

[10] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC

shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the

SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:

(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution.

(ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.

(iii) Status of construction in expansion part, if any.

(iv) The use of treated water in construction or wherever required and no extraction of

ground water.

(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing project.

(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste.

(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation.

(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project.

(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above

raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 9 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S.

N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report

on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.

Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony at

Sector-32, Village Dhunela, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s St.

Patricks Realty Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to

stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Group Housing Colony at

Sector-32, Village Dhunela, District-Gurgaon, Haryanaas under:

Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

1. Plot area 44211.9064 sqm. (10.925 Acres)

2. Built up area 137412.18 sqm

3. License Valid up to 08.08.2019

Page 8: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

8

4. Nos. of floors 9 Blocks + 2 Basements + GF + 17 Floors,

Nursery school, Commercial, Community

building

5. Nos. of Service Units 632 DU + 112 EWS

6. Height 58.2 Meter

7. Green belt 26.03%

8. Water requirement 670 KLD

9. Fresh Water 343 KLD

10. Waste Water 455 KLD

11. STP Capacity 540 KLD

12 Power Requirement 6207.5 KW DHBVN

13. Solid Waste 1804 kg/day (2 nos. OWC proposed for

1263 kg/day)

14. ECS 1589 ECS

15. RWH 11 pits

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of

water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-

involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,

parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] 343KLD of fresh water requirement shown & assurance from HUDA obtained for

420KLD.

[2] Instead of “Tyre Washing” provide Water Troughs at entry & exit of project to

conserve water.

[3] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture & Cooling Tower citing reference of

MoEF guidelines, may the recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be

incorporated ( Table 2.4)

[4] The calculations shown for Water Demand for Cooling Tower citing reference of

MoEF guidelines which are for “Air Conditioning system not for DG set cooling

tower.

[5] Running of DG sets shown 2hrs a day (pg. no. 56) and water required for cooling

of DG sets is 16KLD that too in all three seasons; a mismatch and illogical.

Secondly, this much quantity of water may not lost in evaporation, major quantity

still be in circuit

[6] Location of the Cooling tower may be shown on lay-out plan

[7] The Project Proponent submit a new Water Balance Diagram (for all the three

seasons separately) taking above written observations into consideration

[8] Plantation plan with said no. of trees & canopy area 25 sq. mt be submitted

depicting on the green-area reserved for the same

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above

raised observation within 15 days period.

Page 9: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

9

Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Group Housing Complex

“PSA (6 Acre)” Basai at Sector-37C, Manesar, Gurgaon by M/s Prime

IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

This case was considered in the 84th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.10.2015 and

the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations.

1. The project proponent has submitted license no. 64 of 2011 issued by Town and

Country Planning Department for development of group housing colony on an

area of 17 acres.

2. The SEIAA on the same license had already granted environment clearance for

development of 11 acres of licensed area out of total 17 acre of the licensed area to

M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.

3. The environmental clearance to M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. was

granted on the recommendation of SEAC. The EC letter was issued on

15.04.2014.

4. The AAI clearance submitted by the M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present

project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.

5. The approved zoning plan dated 09.03.2012 submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions

Pvt. Ltd. (Present project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech

Services Pvt. Ltd.

6. The NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification

submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present project proponent) is in the

name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.

7. The EDC/IDC receipt submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present

project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.

It was observed by the Authority that this case is not fit for consideration as

SEIAA has already granted environmental clearance on the recommendation of the

SEAC to M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. and all the vital documents submitted

by the project proponent are in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. to

which EC has already been granted, whereas the application has been submitted by M/s

Prime IT Solution Pvt. Ltd, which is contradictory in terms. It appears that the SEAC has

not considered this fact at all.

The Project Proponent on 07.10.2016 submitted the reply to the observations of

the SEIAA, which was considered by SEAC in the 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 and

SEAC refer back to SEIAA for taking further action.

The case was taken up in today’s meeting; due to lack of

appraisal/recommendations of SEAC, it cannot be discussed further. After detailed

deliberations it was decided to refer back the case to SEAC with the advice to appraise

this case on merit and send its recommendations to the SEIAA within stipulated period as

prescribed in the Notification.

Page 10: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

10

Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony

“Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana

by M/s Ninex Developers Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to

stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed expansion of Group

Housing Colony “Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana as

under:

Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

1. Plot area Existing - 68063.129 sqm

Expansion -14114.231sqm

Total - 82177.36 sqm. (20.306 Acres)

2. Built up area Existing 161429.438 sqm

Expansion 35706.26 sqm

Total -197135.698 sqm

3. License Valid up to 12.12.2016

4. Nos. of floors &

Blocks

Existing -13 blocks, Basement + GF +14

Floors.

Expansion -3 blocks

Total–16 Blocks +Basement +GF+14 Floors

5. Nos. of Service Units 716 DU + 130 EWS +72 Servant units, 2

Nursery School, 2 Commercial Area.

6. Height 42.7 Meter

7. Green belt 30.73%

8. Water requirement 734 KLD

9. Fresh Water 368 KLD

10. Waste Water 491 KLD

11. STP Capacity 580 KLD

12 Power Requirement 5706 KW DHBVN

13. Solid Waste 1980 kg/day (2 nos. OWC proposed for

1386 kg/day)

14. ECS 1314 ECS

15. RWH 20 pits

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of

water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-

involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,

parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] DG sets – 2x600KVA + (3x750 KVA + 2 x 600 KVA); water should be conserved

by having “Air Cooled” or “Cooling Coil” technology instead of “Cooling Tower”

[2] As such Cooling tower is not required and the calculations shown are based on the

MoEF guidelines which are for “Air Conditioning system.

[3] Even if required location of the Cooling tower may be shown on lay-out plan

[4] Water trough may be provided at entry & exit of project so that air borne pollution

which emanates from vehicular activities may be reduced during the construction

phase

Page 11: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

11

[5] Quantity of diesel required during construction & operation phase. Storage plan &

safety measures undertaken

[6] Plantation plan (1929 trees), keeping canopy area 25 sq. mt. may be submitted

with the spacing 2mt X 2mt(pg.no.190)

[7] Water utilization calculation citing reference of MoEF guidelines, may the

recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be incorporated ( Table 2.4) .

Incorporating all the above said observations(regarding water conservation), new

water balance diagrams for all the three seasons be submitted and satisfactory

reply to other observations be submitted

[8] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC

shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the

SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:

(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution

(ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.

(iii) Status of construction in expansion part, if any.

(iv) The use of treated water in construction or wherever required and no extraction of

ground water

(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing project.

(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste

(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation

(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project

(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel

(x) And any other point which visiting team deem suitable

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above

raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 7 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S.

N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report

on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.

Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for the “Revision and Expansion of Group

Housing Colony” located at Village Chauma, Sector-110A & 111,

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to

stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “Revision and Expansion

of Group Housing Colony” located at Village Chauma, Sector-110A & 111, Gurgaon,

Haryana as under:

Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

1. Plot area Existing – 79824.12 sqm

Expansion -5235.61 sqm

Total – 85059.73 sqm. (21.018 Acres)

Page 12: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

12

2. Built up area Existing – 225379.07 sqm

Expansion – 13085.09 sqm

Total -238379.86 sqm

3. License valid up to 24.07.2018

4. Residential Towers (Tower A to G), Community Building

(Tower H1 & H2), Convenient shopping,

Nursery School and EWS block.

5. Nos. of Dwelling

Units

917 DU

6. Height 87 Meter

7. Green belt 35.22%

8. Water requirement 857 KLD

9. Fresh Water 493 KLD

10. Waste Water 572 KLD

11. STP Capacity 700 KLD (600 KLD + 100 KLD)

12 Power Requirement 8439.9 KW DHBVN

13. Solid Waste 2463.69 kg/day

14. ECS 1668 ECS

15. RWH 23 pits

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of

water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-

involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,

parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] 20 + 3.33 KLD fresh water for make-up on daily basis. Why fresh water is

required for make-up when treated water is available. Secondly, “Air Cooled” or

“Cooling Coil” technology may be applied to conserve water.

[2] DG sets would be running for quite longer duration as inferred from the quantity of

water required for cooling, how much diesel would be consumed per day?

Necessary Safety measures taken for safe transportation & storage of Diesel.

[3] 8+5 KLD Fresh water for Filter Backwash; why not the treated water & secondly,

where the water used for Filter backwash would go.

[4] Water Balance Diagram for all 3 seasons to be submitted

[5] The project proponent shall submit location of Cooling Tower on lay-out plan.

[6] Location & carrying capacity of sewer

[7] Proposed no. of trees 4750 & shrubs 12,241, plantation plan be submitted

[8] Pt.8.1 not explained properly

[9] Pt. 8.3; states F/A will be used in road construction; F/A handling system &

APCM system installed may be shown on plan & be well described

[10] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC

shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the

SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:

(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution

(ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.

Page 13: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

13

(iii) Status of construction in expansion part, if any.

(iv) The use of treated water in construction or wherever required and no extraction of

ground water

(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing project.

(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste

(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation

(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project

(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel

(x) And any other point which visiting team deem suitable

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above

raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 9 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S.

N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report

on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.

Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for Mining of minor minerals “Road Metal

& Masonry Stone” at village Mukundpura, District Mahendergarh,

Haryana by Shri Satish Kumar Garg.

This case was considered in the 84th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.10.2015 and

the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations.

1. The project proponent has not submitted NOC from the Forest Department. The

project proponent on 29.10.2015 submitted letter issued by Mines and Geology

Department indicating that the mine leased area is not a Forest land. The SEAC

should examine the same.

2. The SEAC in its recommendation has given different figures of production. The

lease period is for remaining three years whereas in the conditions the production

figures have been given of year wise up to 5 years and sum of production for the

next five years.

3. The mine lease has been granted for 20 years w.e.f. 20.07.1999 up to 10.07.2019.

Therefore the mine is in operation and it is not a new project. The SEAC should

ensure that the project proponent has already effectively reclaimed/rejuvenate the

already excavated mine lease area by adopting all the environmental safe-guards.

4. The project proponent shall submit an undertaking stating that they have kept-

amount (figures to be given) for reclamation of excavated mine lease area and

shall also ensure that all the environmental safe-guards shall be adopted for

closure of mine.

The Project Proponent submitted the reply to the observations of the SEIAA,

which was considered by SEAC in the 143rdmeeting held on 27.10.2016 and SEAC again

has recommended this case for Environmental Clearance. The recommendation of SEAC

was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. The Authority decided to agree with

Page 14: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

14

the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by

imposing the usual conditions in practice.

Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for “Recreation and Leisure Project” in

village- Wazirabad, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/S DLF Limited.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 20.07.2012 submitted

application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Recreation and Leisure

Project” in village- Wazirabad, Gurgaon, Haryana.The Authority decided that Shri

S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection

of project on the following point:

(i) Status of construction in the project if any.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the

site for inspection and shall submit the report within 15 days period.

Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for “Municipal Solid Waste Management

Facility” at Taraori, Karnal, Haryana by Municipal Committee,

Taraori.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent on25.11.2013 submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the “Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility” at

Taraori, Karnal, Haryana.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC

should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation

on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.

Page 15: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

15

Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Complex

at Sector-36-A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s BluejaysRealtech Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent on05.05.2014 submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the Group Housing Complex at Sector-36-A, Gurgaon,

Haryana.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC

should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation

on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.

Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for National Cancer Institute, AIIMS,

Jhajjar, Haryana by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS).

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 29.10.2014 submitted

application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed National Cancer Institute,

AIIMS, Jhajjar, Haryana.The Authority decided that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar

Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:

(i) Status of construction in the project if any.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the

site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within 15

days period.

Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for the construction of group housing

project at village- Badshahpur, Sec-66, Gurgaon by M/S Golden Glow

Estates Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

Page 16: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

16

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent on01.03.2011 submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the Group Housing project at village- Badshahpur, Sec-66,

Gurgaon.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC

should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation

on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.

Item No.[18] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project-

EDGE Towers (Phase-II) At Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s S.A. Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent on13.07.2012 submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the Group Housing Project EDGE Towers (Phase-II) At

Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon, Haryana.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC

should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation

on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.

Item No.[19] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Setting up of a Senior

Residential School (Institution) at village Gamdoj, Tehsil Sohna, Dist.

Gurgaon, Haryana by Ms. Bluebells Educational Society.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

amended Notification dated 22.12.2014 issued by MoEF & CC, GoI and the Authority

Page 17: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

17

decided to grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental

clearance subject to compliance to guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI dated

09.06.2015.

Item No.[20] Environmental Clearance for expansion of “Jai ParkashMukund Lal

Innovative Engg. & Technology Institute” at

RadourDistt.Yamunanagar, Haryana by JAI ParkashMukand Lal

Innovative Engineering & Technology Institute.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

amended Notification dated 22.12.2014 issued by MoEF & CC, GoI and the Authority

decided to grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental

clearance subject to compliance to guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI dated

09.06.2015.

Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for the development of Group Housing

Colony “Rudco Golf Greens”located at Revenue Estates of Village

Palwal, Sector-7, Palwal, Haryana M/s Rurban Development

Corporation Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent on01.08.2013submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the development of Group Housing Colony “Rudco Golf

Greens” located at Revenue Estates of Village Palwal, Sector-7, Palwal, Haryana.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC

should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation

on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.

Item No.[22] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential & Non-

residential buildings for Haryana Police at FerozpurNamak Village,

Nuh Taluk Mewat District by Haryana Police Housing Corporation

Ltd.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

Page 18: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

18

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent on27.06.2014submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the Residential & Non-residential buildings for Haryana

Police at Ferozpur Namak Village, Nuh Taluk Mewat District.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC

should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation

on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.

Item No.[23] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential and Non-

residential buildings for Haryana Police at Bahraula Village, Palwal

Taluk, Palwal District, Haryana by Haryana Police Housing

Corporation Ltd.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent on 27.06.2014 submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the Residential and Non-residential buildings for Haryana

Police at Bahraula Village, Palwal Taluk, Palwal District, Haryana.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC

should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation

on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.

Item No.[24] Environmental Clearance for construction of Warehouse Project

located at Village-Ghatal Maniawas, district-Rewari, Haryana by M/s

Navtech Projects Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

Page 19: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

19

It was noticed that the project proponent on30.06.2014submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the Warehouse Project located at Village-Ghatal Maniawas,

District-Rewari, Haryana.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC

should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation

on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.

Item No.[25] Environmental Clearance for construction of “5 Star Hotel” at Village

Chakarpur, Golf Course Road, Sector-42, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Munjal Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 07.07.2014 submitted

application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed “5 Star Hotel” at Village

Chakarpur, Golf Course Road, Sector-42, Gurgaon, Haryana.The Authority decided that

Sh. S. N. Mishra and Mr. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC shall visit the site for

inspection of project on the following point:

(i) Status of construction in the project if any.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that Sh. S. N. Mishra and Mr. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC shall visit the

site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within 15

days period.

Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Five Star Hotel” at

Village Prithla, District Palwal, Haryana by M/s SRS Retreat Services

Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 22.07.2014 submitted

application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Five Star Hotel” at Village

Page 20: Minutes of the 98th held on. 05 December, 2016 …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under: Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

20

Prithla, District Palwal, Haryana.The Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Shri

Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the

following point:

(i) Status of construction in the project if any.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit

the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within

15 days period.

Item No.[27] Environmental Clearance for expansion of RTC at Bhondsi Village

Sohna Taluk, Gurgaon, Haryana by Haryana Police Housing

Corporation.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent on28.07.2014submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the expansion of RTC at Bhondsi Village Sohna Taluk,

Gurgaon, Haryana.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC

should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation

on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.

******