“Minute to Win It!”
description
Transcript of “Minute to Win It!”
![Page 1: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
“Minute to
Win It!”
![Page 2: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction• Our project dealt with seeing how
many quarters a student could toss into a jar within one minute.
• After one minute, the student was no longer able to toss quarters into the jar and we then counted the number of quarters they made into the jar.
• We recorded the variables of gender, eye color, hair color, number of quarters made into the jar.
![Page 3: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Quantitative • Gender• Eye Color• Partner Categorical
• Gender• Eye Color• Hair Color
• Gender v. Eye ColorConclusion
![Page 4: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2
4
6
8
10
Number_of_Quarters_In0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Project 1 Histogram
Number_of_Quarters_In0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Project 1 Box Plot
Histogram
Boxplot
![Page 5: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Mean: 4.97 quarters
Std. Dev.: 2.90
quarters
Min: 1 quarter
Q1: 2 quarters
Med: 5 quarters
Q3: 7 quarters
Max: 11 quarters
IQR: 5 quarters
Summary Stats
![Page 6: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
No Outliers:Q1-(1.5 x IQR)2-(1.5 x 5)-5.5Q3+(1.5 x IQR)7+(1.5 x 5)14.5(-5.5,14.5) quarters = accepted range
#3. #4.
#5.
Shape: Right Skewed and UnimodalCenter: Center @ Median=5 quarters and IQR=5 quartersSpread: Range = (1,11) with no outliers
No, it is not a normal a normal curve because it is right skewed.1 Std. Dev. (2.07-7.87) = 47.06%2 Std. Dev. (-0.83,10.77) = 97.06%3 Std. Dev. (-3.73,13.67) = 100%
![Page 7: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
FM
Number_of_Quarters_In0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Project 1 Box Plot
Gender: Boxplot
![Page 8: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Mean: 3.69 quarters
Std. Dev.: 2.62
quarters
Min: 1 quarter
Q1: 2 quarters
Med: 2 quarters
Q3: 5 quarters
Max: 9 quarters
IQR: 3 quarters
Count: 13 quarters
Mean: 5.76 quarters
Std. Dev.: 2.83
quarters
Min: 1 quarter
Q1: 4 quarters
Med: 5 quarters
Q3: 7 quarters
Max: 11 quarters
IQR: 3 quarters
Count: 21 quarters
Female
Male
![Page 9: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
#3.
#4.
Shape: The shape for the females was right skewed whereas the shape for the males was symmetrical. Both were unimodal.Center: The median of the female’s data was 2 quarters which was lower than the median of the male’s data at 5 quarters. The IQR of the female’s data was 3 quarters which was equal to the IQR of the male’s data also at 3 quarters.Spread: The range for the female’s data was (1,9) quarters which is narrower that the range for the male’s data at (1,11) quarters. Neither of the sets of data had any outliers.
Yes, we believe that gender had a slight effect on our data because overall the males did slightly better than the females in this sample. However, this was a relatively small sample so with a larger sample size we would have gotten more accurate results.
![Page 10: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Black
Blue
Brow n
Green
Grey
Hazel
Number_of_Quarters_In0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Project 1 Box Plot
Eye Color: Boxplot
![Page 11: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Mean: 5 quarters
Count: 1 quarters
Std. Dev.: 0 quarters
Min: 5 quarter
Q1: 5 quarters
Med: 5 quarters
Q3: 5 quarters
Max: 5 quarters
IQR: 0 quarters
Mean: 4.33 quarters
Count: 12 quarters
Std. Dev.: 2.67
quarters
Min: 1 quarter
Q1: 2 quarters
Med: 4 quarters
Q3: 6 quarters
Max: 10 quarters
IQR: 4 quarters
Mean: 5.38 quarters
Count: 13 quarters
Std. Dev.: 3.12
quarters
Min: 1 quarter
Q1: 2 quarters
Med: 5 quarters
Q3: 8 quarters
Max: 11 quarters
IQR: 6 quarters
Black
BlueBrown
![Page 12: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Mean: 5.5 quarters
Count: 2 quarters
Std. Dev.: 4.95
quarters
Min: 2 quarter
Q1: 2 quarters
Med: 5.5 quarters
Q3: 9 quarters
Max: 9 quarters
IQR: 7 quarters
Mean: 7 quarters
Count: 2 quarters
Std. Dev.: 4.24
quarters
Min: 4 quarter
Q1: 4 quarters
Med: 7 quarters
Q3: 10 quarters
Max: 10 quarters
IQR: 6 quarters
Mean: 4.25 quarters
Count: 4 quarters
Std. Dev.: 2.63
quarters
Min: 2 quarter
Q1: 2 quarters
Med: 4 quarters
Q3: 6.5 quarters
Max: 7 quarters
IQR: 4.5 quarters
Green
GreyHazel
![Page 13: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
#3.No, we believe that the categorical variable of eye color does not have a significant effect on the number of quarters tossed in the jar. The data was all fairly similar for the most part, however, our results could have been more accurate if we had a larger sample size to work with.
![Page 14: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
AN
Number_of_Quarters_In0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Project 1 Box Plot
Partner: Boxplot
![Page 15: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Gender: Bar Graph
Male Female0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
Gender
61.76%
38.24%
![Page 16: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Eye Color: Bar Graph
Black Blue Brown Green Grey Hazel0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
Eye Color
Series1
2.94%
35.29%
39.24%
5.88% 5.88%
11.76%
![Page 17: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Hair Color: Bar Graph
Black Blonde Brown Red0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
Hair Color
Series1
17.65%20.59%
58.82%
2.94%
![Page 18: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Gender v. Eye ColorMale Female Total
Black 0 1 1Blue 8 4 12Brown 7 6 13Green 1 1 2Grey 2 0 2Hazel 3 1 4Total 21 13 34
Male Female TotalBlack 0.00% 2.94% 2.94%Blue 23.53% 11.76% 35.29%Brown 20.59% 17.65% 38.24%Green 2.94% 2.94% 5.88%Grey 5.88% 0.00% 5.88%Hazel 8.82% 2.94% 11.76%Total 61.76% 38.24% 100.00%
Male Female TotalBlack 0.00% 7.69% 2.94%Blue 38.10% 30.77% 35.29%Brown 33.33% 46.15% 38.24%Green 4.76% 7.69% 5.88%Grey 9.52% 0.00% 5.88%Hazel 14.29% 7.69% 11.76%Total 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
![Page 19: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Male Female0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Gender v Eye Color
HazelGreyGreenBrownBlueBlack
Gender v Eye Color: Stacked
![Page 20: “Minute to Win It!”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56816719550346895ddb8eea/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Conclusion• We believe that our
results and conclusions could have been more accurate if we had a larger sample size
• While our results told us that gender plays a small role in one’s ability to toss quarters into a jar, we believe that eye color and partner do not.