MINERALOGY, REFLECTANCE SPECTRA, AND PHYSICAL … · Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of...

1
MINERALOGY, REFLECTANCE SPECTRA, AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE CHELYABINSK LL5 CHONDRITE — INSIGHT INTO SHOCK-INDUCED CHANGES IN ASTEROID REGOLITHS Tomas Kohout 1, 2 , Maria Gritsevich 3, 4, 5 , Viktor Grokhovsky 6 , Grigoriy Yakovlev 6 , Jakub Haloda 7, 8 , Patricie Halodova 7 , Radoslaw Michallik 9 , Antti Penttilä 1 , Karri Muinonen 1,3 1. Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland 2. Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojová 269, 16500 Prague 6, Czech Republic 3. Finnish Geodetic Institute, Geodeetinrinne 2, P.O. Box 15, FI-02431 Masala, Finland 4. Institute of Mechanics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Michurinsky prt., 1, 119192, Moscow, Russia 5. Russian Academy of Sciences, Dorodnicyn Computing Centre, Department of Computational Physics, Vavilova ul. 40, 119333 Moscow, Russia 6. Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia 7. Czech Geological Survey, Geologická 6, 152 00 Praha 5, Czech Republic 8. Oxford Instruments NanoAnalysis, High Wycombe, Bucks, United Kingdom 9. Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland Introduction On February 15, 2013, at 9:22 am, an exceptionally bright and long duration fireball was observed by many eyewitnesses in the Chelyabinsk region, Russia. A large-sized object with a relatively low mass-loss rate and shallow atmospheric entry angle led to a very long trail. The event was recorded by numerous video cameras from the ground and was also imaged from space by the Meteosat and Fengyun satellites. A strong shock wave associated with the fireball caused significant damage including broken windows and partial building collapses in Chelyabinsk and the surrounding territories. Two days later the first fragments of the Chelyabinsk meteorite were reported to be found around Pervomaiskoe, Deputatsky, and Yemanzhelinka, located approximately 40 km south of Chelyabinsk. In total three lithologies, the light-colored, dark-colored, and impact melt lithologies, werefound within the recoveredmeteorites. Conclusions The Chelyabinsk fireball with an almost instant recovery of a large number of fresh meteorites is one of the most spectacular meteorite fall events in the recent history. Three lithologies, light-colored, dark-colored, and impact melt, were found within the recovered meteorites. All three are of LL5 composition. The dark- colored lithology is being shocked to a higher level (shock darkening). The silicate grains are mechanically crushed and partial melting, limited to metal and sulfides, occurs. The impact melt lithology experienced higher temperatures during the shock and is made of crushed mineral grains with a silicate melt. Based on the magnetic susceptibility, the Chelyabinsk meteorites are richer in metallic iron as compared to other LLchondrites (in the intermediate range between LLand Lchondrites). The measured bulk and grain densities and the porosity closely resemble other LL chondrites. Shock darkening does not have a significant effect on the material physical properties. However, changes in reflectance spectra are observed in the highly shocked lithologies. A decrease in reflectance and suppression of the silicate absorption bands is observed in both shock-darkened and impact melt lithologies. This is similar to the space weathering effects observed on asteroids. However, no spectral slope change similar to space weathering is observed. Thus, it is possible that some dark asteroids with invisible silicate absorption bands may be composed of relatively fresh shock-darkened or molten chondritic material. The main spectral difference between shock darkening and space weathering of asteroid surfaces is the presence of the spectral slopechange (reddening) in the latter case. Acknowledgments The project is supported by Academy of Finland, Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Czech Republic, and ERC Advanced Grant. Authors would like to thank to Ilya Weinstein for help with the measurements arrangements and to Alevtina Maksimova, Razilya Gizzatullina, Albina Zainullina, and Anastasia Uryvkova for help with the laboratory work. Mineralogy The light coloredlithology is a LL5 ordinary chondrite shocked to S4 level. The dark colored lithology is of identical LL5 composition. However, it is shocked to higher level (shock-darkened). The silicate grains are mechanically crushed. Partial melting occurred and is limited mainly to metal and sulfides. Molten metal and sulfide-rich melt formed a dense network of fine veins impregnating the inter- and intra-granular pore space within crushed silicate grains. Thus, high pressure loads and moderate temperature rise is characteristic for shock darkening The impact melt lithology is a breccia of crushed mineral grains with various amounts of silicate melt. It derived from similar LL5 source material and is present as inter-granular veins within both light-colored and dark-colored lithologies, or as a matrix supporting larger ~mm to ~ cm-sized clasts in brecciated meteorites. In comparison to shock darkening the impact melting requires higher temperatures to reach melting point of the silicates. Light-colored Dark-colored Bulk density (g/cm 3 ) 3.32 (s.d. 0.09) 3.27 (s.d.0.08) Grain density (g/cm 3 ) 3.51 (s.d. 0.07) 3.42 (s.d. 0.10) Porosity (%) 6.0 (s.d. 3.2) 5.7 (s.d. 1.7) Magnetic susceptibility (log in 10 -9 m 3 /kg) 4.49 (s.d. 0.07) 4.52 (s.d. 0.15) Physical Properties Bulk and grain density and porosity of both light- and dark-colored lithology match values typical for LL chondrites. Magnetic susceptibility, however, is in intermediate L/LL range. Thus, compared to a typical LL chondrite, Chelyabinsk meteorites are richer in metallic iron. No significant difference related to shock-darkening is observed among light- and dark-colored lithology or impact melt rich clasts. Thus, shock does not have a significant effect on the material physical properties. The reflectance spectrum of the light-colored lithology is typical for an LL ordinary chondrite with the presence of 1 and 2 μm olivine and pyroxene absorption bands. Such a spectrum is similar to fresh S or Q type asteroids. In contrast, the shocked dark-colored or impact melt lithologies are darker and the silicate absorption bands are almost invisible. Thus, the shock history affects the reflectance and the depth of the absorption bands of chondrite material in a way similar to space weathering. However, unlike space weathering (or at least unlike its lunar type form with the presence of nanophase iron in the surface coatings of silicate minerals) there is no change in the spectral slope observed due to the increasedshock. Impact melt vein Impact melt vein SEM-BSE Impact melt vein Sulphide and metal-rich melt vein SEM-BSE Light-colored Lithology Impact Melt Lithology Dark-colored Lithology Reflectance Spectra Magnetic Susceptibility Impact melt breccia Light-colored lithology clast SEM-BSE LL L H Light Dark 3.6 4 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 Log (in 10 -9 m 3 /kg) 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 Wavelength (nm) 0 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2 Refectance Light-colored lithology Dark-colored lithology Impact melt lithology 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 Mole % Fa in ol 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Mole %Fs in low-Ca px Light Dark Impact melt H L LL 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Mole % Fa in ol 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Frequency (n=25) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Mole % Fs in low-Ca px 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Frequency (n=20) = 27.96 Me = 27.90 = 0.52 n = 25 = 22.70 Me = 22.63 = 0.57 n = 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Mole % Fs in low-Ca px 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Frequency (n=15) 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Mole % Fa in ol 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Frequency (n=24) Light ol Light px = 27.88 Me = 27.81 = 0.42 n = 24 Dark ol Dark px = 22.52 Me = 22.53 = 0.39 n = 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Mole % Fs in low-Ca px 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Frequency (n=6) 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Mole % Fa in ol 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Frequency (n=6) = 29.09 Me = 28.19 = 0.27 n = 6 = 23.41 Me = 23.41 = 0.10 n = 6 IM ol IM px

Transcript of MINERALOGY, REFLECTANCE SPECTRA, AND PHYSICAL … · Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of...

Page 1: MINERALOGY, REFLECTANCE SPECTRA, AND PHYSICAL … · Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojová 269, 16500 Prague 6, Czech Republic 3. Finnish Geodetic

MINERALOGY, REFLECTANCE SPECTRA, AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE CHELYABINSK LL5 CHONDRITE — INSIGHT INTO SHOCK-INDUCED CHANGESIN ASTEROID REGOLITHS

Tomas Kohout1, 2, Maria Gritsevich3, 4, 5, Viktor Grokhovsky6, Grigoriy Yakovlev6, Jakub Haloda7, 8, Patricie Halodova7, Radoslaw Michallik9, Antti Penttilä1, Karri Muinonen1,3

1. Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland2. Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojová 269, 16500 Prague 6, Czech Republic3. Finnish Geodetic Institute, Geodeetinrinne 2, P.O. Box 15, FI-02431 Masala, Finland4. Institute of Mechanics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Michurinsky prt., 1, 119192, Moscow, Russia5. Russian Academy of Sciences, Dorodnicyn Computing Centre, Department of Computational Physics, Vavilova ul. 40, 119333 Moscow, Russia6. Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia7. Czech Geological Survey, Geologická 6, 152 00 Praha 5, Czech Republic8. Oxford Instruments NanoAnalysis, High Wycombe, Bucks, United Kingdom9. Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland

IntroductionOn February 15, 2013, at 9:22 am, an exceptionally bright and long duration fireball was observed by many eyewitnesses in the Chelyabinsk

region, Russia. A large-sized object with a relatively low mass-loss rate and shallow atmospheric entry angle led to a very long trail. The event

was recorded by numerous video cameras from the ground and was also imaged from space by the Meteosat and Fengyun satellites. A strong

shock wave associated with the fireball caused significant damage including broken windows and partial building collapses in Chelyabinsk and

the surrounding territories.

Two days later the first fragments of the Chelyabinsk meteorite were reported to be found around Pervomaiskoe, Deputatsky, and Yemanzhelinka,

located approximately 40 km south of Chelyabinsk. In total three lithologies, the light-colored, dark-colored, and impact melt lithologies,

were found within the recovered meteorites.

Conclusions

The Chelyabinsk fireball with an almost instant recovery of a large number of fresh meteorites is one of the most spectacular meteorite fall events in the recent history. Three lithologies, light-colored, dark-colored, and impact melt, were found within the recovered meteorites. All three are of LL5 composition. The dark-

colored lithology is being shocked to a higher level (shock darkening). The silicate grains are mechanically crushed and partial melting, limited to metal and sulfides, occurs. The impact melt lithology experienced higher temperatures during the shock and is made of crushed mineral grains with a silicate melt.

Based on the magnetic susceptibility, the Chelyabinsk meteorites are richer in metallic iron as compared to other LLchondrites (in the intermediate range between LLand L chondrites). The measured bulk and grain densities and the porosity closely resemble other LL chondrites. Shock darkening does not have a significant

effect on the material physical properties.

However, changes in reflectance spectra are observed in the highly shocked lithologies. A decrease in reflectance and suppression of the silicate absorption bands is observed in both shock-darkened and impact melt lithologies. This is similar to the space weathering effects observed on asteroids. However, no spectral slope

change similar to space weathering is observed. Thus, it is possible that some dark asteroids with invisible silicate absorption bands may be composed of relatively fresh shock-darkened or molten chondritic material. The main spectral difference between shock darkening and space weathering of asteroid surfaces is the

presence of the spectral slope change (reddening) in the latter case.

AcknowledgmentsThe project is supported by Academy of Finland, Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Czech Republic, and ERC Advanced Grant. Authors would like to thank to Ilya Weinstein for help with the measurements arrangements and to Alevtina Maksimova, Razilya Gizzatullina, Albina Zainullina, and Anastasia Uryvkova

for help with the laboratory work.

Mineralogy

• The light colored lithology is a LL5 ordinary chondrite shocked to S4 level.

• The dark colored lithology is of identical LL5 composition. However, it is shocked to higher level (shock-darkened).

The silicate grains are mechanically crushed. Partial melting occurred and is limited mainly to metal and sulfides.

Molten metal and sulfide-rich melt formed a dense network of fine veins impregnating the inter- and intra-granular

pore space within crushed silicate grains. Thus, high pressure loads and moderate temperature rise is characteristic

for shock darkening

• The impact melt lithology is a breccia of crushed mineral grains with various amounts of silicate melt. It derived

from similar LL5 source material and is present as inter-granular veins within both light-colored and dark-colored

lithologies, or as a matrix supporting larger ~mm to ~ cm-sized clasts in brecciated meteorites. In comparison to

shock darkening the impact melting requires higher temperatures to reach melting point of the silicates.

Light-colored Dark-colored

Bulk density (g/cm3) 3.32 (s.d. 0.09) 3.27 (s.d.0.08)

Grain density (g/cm3) 3.51 (s.d. 0.07) 3.42 (s.d. 0.10)

Porosity (%) 6.0 (s.d. 3.2) 5.7 (s.d. 1.7)

Magnetic susceptibility(log in 10-9 m3/kg)

4.49 (s.d. 0.07) 4.52 (s.d. 0.15)

Physical Properties

Bulk and grain density and porosity of both light- and dark-colored lithology match values typical for LL chondrites. Magnetic susceptibility,

however, is in intermediate L/LL range. Thus, compared to a typical LL chondrite, Chelyabinsk meteorites are richer in metallic iron. No

significant difference related to shock-darkening is observed among light- and dark-colored lithology or impact melt rich clasts. Thus, shock does

not have a significant effect on the material physical properties.

The reflectance spectrum of the light-colored lithology is typical for an LL ordinary chondrite with the presence of 1 and 2 µm olivine and

pyroxene absorption bands. Such a spectrum is similar to fresh S or Q type asteroids. In contrast, the shocked dark-colored or impact melt

lithologies are darker and the silicate absorption bands are almost invisible. Thus, the shock history affects the reflectance and the depth of the

absorption bands of chondrite material in a way similar to space weathering. However, unlike space weathering (or at least unlike its lunar type

form with the presence of nanophase iron in the surface coatings of silicate minerals) there is no change in the spectral slope observed due to the

increased shock.

Impact melt vein

Impact melt vein

SEM-BSE

Impact melt vein

Sulphide and metal-rich melt

vein

SEM-BSE

Light-colored Lithology Impact Melt LithologyDark-colored Lithology

Reflectance Spectra Magnetic Susceptibility

Impact melt breccia

Light-colored lithology

clast

SEM-BSE

LL

L

H

Ligh

t

Dar

k

3.6

4

4.4

4.8

5.2

5.6

Log

(in

10-9

m3 /k

g)

800 1200 1600 2000 2400Wavelength (nm)

0

0.04

0.08

0.12

0.16

0.2

Ref

ecta

nce

Light-colored lithologyDark-colored lithologyImpact melt lithology

12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32

Mole % Fa in ol

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

Mol

e %

Fs

in lo

w-C

a px

LightDarkImpact melt

H

L

LL

24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Mole % Fa in ol

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Freq

uenc

y (n

=25)

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Mole % Fs in low-Ca px

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Freq

uenc

y (n

=20)

= 27.96Me = 27.90

= 0.52n = 25

= 22.70Me = 22.63

= 0.57n = 20

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Mole % Fs in low-Ca px

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Freq

uenc

y (n

=15)

24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Mole % Fa in ol

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Freq

uenc

y (n

=24)

Light ol Light px

= 27.88Me = 27.81

= 0.42n = 24

Dark ol Dark px = 22.52Me = 22.53

= 0.39n = 15

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Mole % Fs in low-Ca px

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Freq

uenc

y (n

=6)

24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Mole % Fa in ol

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Freq

uenc

y (n

=6)

= 29.09Me = 28.19

= 0.27n = 6

= 23.41Me = 23.41

= 0.10n = 6

IM ol IM px