MILTON KEYNES PARTNERSHIP · 2013-10-03 · As part of this report we explore the implications of...
Transcript of MILTON KEYNES PARTNERSHIP · 2013-10-03 · As part of this report we explore the implications of...
GVA Grimley LLP 3 Brindleyplace Birmingham B1 2JB 0870 900 8990 www.gvagrimley.co.uk
MILTON KEYNES PARTNERSHIP Milton Keynes Employment Land Study May 2007
Milton Keynes Partnership Contents
May 07
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION AND APPROACH .......................................................................1 2. POLICY AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT........................................................5 3. PROPERTY MARKET REVIEW............................................................................31 4. ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT AND POTENTIAL SUPPLY..................................53 5. FUTURE DEMAND – SHORT TERM/LONG TERM ..............................................75 6. CONTRASTING FUTURE DEMAND/SUPPLY......................................................99 7. COMPARATOR CITY ANALYSIS.......................................................................113 8. DELIVERY STRATEGY......................................................................................124
APPENDICES
Appendix A- Existing Employment areas and Employment site proformas Appendix B- Methodology for ranking of employment sites Appendix C- Development Typologies Appendix D- CMK Plots
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 1
1. INTRODUCTION AND APPROACH Brief
1.1 This chapter outlines our appreciation of the Brief and the key issues that have been taken
into account as part of this work. Our involvement in preparing the Long Term Sustainable
Growth Plan for Milton Keynes �MK2031) has given us a wide understanding of the many
issues driving growth in the area.
1.2 Key to this growth is the role of the property market in delivering future growth and the type
of businesses that the area seeks to attract and its implications for the property market in
terms of property product. The most fundamental issue for MK2031 is the geographical
location of future employment land to meet planned growth in houses �68,600) and jobs as
set out in the Milton Keynes Sub-Regional Strategy. The main issues that are considered
as part of this report are as follows:
• Location of Growth;
• Employment Growth;
• Knowledge Economy Jobs;
• Property Market Implications; and
• Timetable for Growth.
Location of growth
1.3 This is a key consideration of the MK2031 work, which assessed 6 growth options offering
varying levels of urban capacity achievable �low, medium and high) and a quantum of
development to be delivered in the peripheral areas outside the Milton Keynes Local
Authority boundary.
1.4 Expansion areas have been identified to accommodate growth that can’t be provided for in
the urban area. Planning policy directs us to consider new development by applying the
sequential test, looking at brownfield land before greenfield land. The Sub-Regional
Strategy identifies that not all of the proposed growth can be accommodated within the
Milton Keynes urban area and this is a key issue for this report and the MK2031 report.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 2
1.5 The MK2031 study has had a number of key inputs into this work, most notably the land
suitability and deliverability work, which has considered the development capacity / mix on
a sample of employment sites to deliver regeneration through potential intensification.
Another key input has been the work undertaken on the deliverability of both brownfield
and greenfield land to identify the most suitable and deliverable sites for development
within the urban and rural areas. This work has fed into our assessment of current and
potential supply, which is presented at Chapter 4.
Employment Growth
1.6 The Milton Keynes and South Midlands �MKSM) sub-regional strategy assumes a total
employment growth of 68,600 to 2031, equivalent to around 2,287 jobs per annum. In fact,
this may be a rather conservative estimate of employment growth, however this figure is
retained for two reasons, these being:
• The need to ensure that levels of self containment within Milton Keynes, in particular
net commuting flows, are maintained. The MKSM strategy has incorporated a
dwellings / job ratio of 1:1 for monitoring purposes in order to achieve this balance.
The indicative employment figure of 44,900 by 2021 matches the number of dwellings
planned for the same period.
• The MKSM Strategy outlines a more balanced economic pattern of growth within the
MKSM sub-region in order to achieve regeneration benefits in neighbouring towns.
Therefore growth targets within Milton Keynes assume below trend growth, whilst
other areas in the sub-region, such as Northampton and Corby will assume above
trend growth.
1.7 The Brief outlines ongoing debate concerning the validity of the 1:1 ratio that is suggested
in the MKSM Sub-Regional Strategy. As part of this report we explore the implications of
restraining growth in Milton Keynes in order to allow growth of neighbouring towns.
1.8 Demand based employment forecasts, linked to employment based local economic
strategies and plans, have provided us with an understanding of how the Milton Keynes
economy could grow under different scenarios to 2031 and the implications this would
have for the demand for employment space.
Method
1.9 Our approach has been based on the diagram presented below.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 3
Figure 1.1 – Approach to Study
INCEPTION
STAG
E 1STA
GE 2
STAG
E 3STA
GE 4
STAG
E 5
BackgroundInformation &
EconomicAnalysis
Assessmentof Sites
Assessmentof Premises
CentresAssessment
PropertyMarketReview
CompetitorAreas Review
Policy Market /Financial
DisposalPractices
Monitoring &EvaluationFramework
Reporting
EmploymentLand / SpaceRequirements
GapAnalysis
PortfolioRequirements
DeliveryRequirements
Current SupplyQuality &Quantity
FutureRequirements
Impact ofPopulation
Growth
Target GrowthSectors
Source: GVA Grimley, 2007
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 4
1.10 This approach provides:
• An understanding of the context/drivers of the local economy and property market
�Stage 1);
• Development of economic scenarios to assess demand �Stage 2);
• Comparison against available supply and future requirements �Stage 3);
• Delivery requirements �Stage 4); and
• Monitoring and evaluation �Stage 5).
1.11 As such, it complies with Employment Land Review guidance produced by the
ODPM/DCLG in December 2004 but extends this to consider town centre floorspace and
broader delivery issues.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 5
2. POLICY AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT 2.1 This section reviews some of the key policy and research documents that are relevant to
the Milton Keynes area, its economic structure and employment land supply, as well as
providing an analysis of socio-economic baseline data.
Review of Policy
South East Plan
2.2 The Draft South East Plan was submitted to Government in March 2006. The examination
in public took place between November 2006 and March 2007. The panel report is
expected in July 2007. There are a number of draft policies which are relevant to this
work.
• Policy RE1 refers to the need to support regionally important sectors and clusters.
This should take into account of national economic interests and recommendations of
SEEDA and local business partnerships. A number of mechanisms to achieve this are
suggested in the draft policy including ensuring an adequate supply of land and
premises; enhancing and promoting local assets to support sectors/clusters, and
promoting non land use initiatives that will benefit and foster growth.
• Policy RE2 refers to employment land provision and the need for local authorities to
assess the needs of their local economy and take into account sub regional strategies
for the location quantity and nature of employment land and premises.
2.3 The key diagram identifies Milton Keynes as part of the Milton Keynes and Aylesbury Vale
sub regional strategy area and as a regional hub �Policy CC86). The key challenge
identified for the Milton Keynes and Aylesbury Vale sub regional area is to ensure that
economic growth and employment increase in line with population.
2.4 Draft Policy MKAV1 identifies a proposed spatial framework for the Milton Keynes Growth
Area, its key components are:
• 48,850 new dwellings to be provided 2006 – 2026, through urban intensification and
the development of new sustainable urban extensions.
• Levels of proposed development to be monitored against an increase in employment
of 48,850 jobs by 2002 – 2026.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 6
• Key locations for employment related development would be Central Milton Keynes,
Bletchley, Wolverton, Newport Pagnell and some locations within urban extensions at
focal points and on the public transport system.
2.5 The draft policy refers to there being adequate employment land supply to meet forecast
demand to 2016.
Sub Regional Strategy – MKSM
2.6 The Milton Keynes and South Midlands �MKSM) Sub-Regional Strategy, published in
2004, is a co-ordinated review of policy for the MKSM sub region, which covers three
regions, these being the East Midlands, East of England and the South East.
2.7 The MKSM Sub-Regional Strategy has undergone a long period of stakeholder and public
consultation in order to appreciate the scale and scope of growth within the sub-region and
to identify the need for a cross regional strategy.
2.8 The evolution of the MKSM Sub-Regional Strategy came about through the MKSM Study,
which was published in 2002. The study evaluated four options for distributing growth
throughout the sub region.
2.9 Following on from the Study, Growth Area Assessments �GAA) were developed for each of
the growth points identified, to provide a recommended broad pattern, timing and phasing
of development; to determine how much growth is capable of being accommodated in the
urban areas and to provide guidance on how these areas could be developed in the most
sustainable way.
2.10 Milton Keynes, as one of the identified growth points within the MKSM Sub-Region has the
objective of maturing as a major regional centre, particularly through the substantial
development of the central area known as Central Milton Keynes �CMK). This growth will
be supported by an enhanced public transport system.
2.11 In terms of new housing provision, the MKSM Sub-Regional Strategy identified a total
growth of 44,900 homes within Milton Keynes to 2021. Growth in the level of employment
is expected to follow a ratio of 1:1, with 44,900 additional jobs expected within Milton
Keynes to 2021. In the longer term, from 2021-2031, the MKSM Sub-Regional Strategy
proposes an additional 23,700 new homes within Milton Keynes, making a total of 68,600
new homes to 2031. In terms of predicted job growth between 2021 and 2031, the strategy
makes no reference as to the aspirational amount of growth for the area, although it is
reasonable to expect that the amount of growth would be in the ratio of at least 1:1.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 7
2.12 With regard to the creation of sustainable communities, the strategy makes the point that
areas within the MKSM sub region will undergo many changes, in most cases, more than
any other places in the country. The strategy identifies the following requirements,
amongst others, as being key to building sustainable communities:
• A flourishing local economy to provide jobs and wealth;
• Sufficient size, scale and density of development and of the right layout to support
basic amenities in neighbourhoods and minimise the use of resources �land);
• Good public transport and other transport infrastructure, both within communities and
linking to urban, rural and regional centres; and
• Effective engagement and participation by local people, groups and businesses,
especially in the planning, design and long-term stewardship of their community, and
an active voluntary and community sector.
2.13 The MKSM sub-region lies within two strategic economic corridors, London to Birmingham
and the “Oxford to Cambridge” Arc �O2C), meaning it is well placed to build its economic
prosperity. The strategy identifies a number of growth sectors, which it states are key to
the economic prosperity of the sub-region. These sectors are identified as being:
• High Performance Automotive;
• Creative Industries;
• Other Knowledge-Based Industries;
• Food and Drink;
• Freight and Logistics;
• Health and Social Care;
• Tourism; and
• Airport Services.
2.14 Of the above list those growth sectors that are appropriate to Milton Keynes include
creative industries, knowledge based industries, freight and logistics and health and social
care.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 8
2.15 The delivery of the MKSM Sub-Regional Strategy is to be through a number of
mechanisms including the MKSM Inter-regional Board, Regional Housing Boards, Local
Development Documents and Masterplans / Strategic Development Briefs.
Oxford to Cambridge Arc (O2C)
2.16 The O2C Arc was launched in 2003 to promote the extraordinary and unique set of
educational, research, business, commercial and governmental resources that exist in the
area around and between Oxford and Cambridge – with Milton Keynes close to its centre.
The Arc began as an idea to link Oxford and Cambridge Universities, both world famous
centres of research and innovation, but relatively small in international terms, to create an
“arc” of entrepreneurial activity that could rival Silicon Valley. The stated objective of the
O2C Arc is to develop a knowledge-based economy (KBE) of sufficient mass and
momentum to challenge the best in the world.
2.17 The Arc is supported and funded by the three Regional Development Agencies, SEEDA,
EMDA and EEDA that overlap it, as well as all the Economic Partnerships within it
�Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Milton Keynes, Bedfordshire and Luton, Northamptonshire
and Cambridge) and several other Arc-based Network Organisations. The O2C Arc Ltd
became a legal entity in April 2004. In the first half of 2006 the O2C Arc strategy was
reviewed and the initiative relaunched.
2.18 The recent review noted that the areas within the Arc lag behind comparable European
areas. In GDP per head terms �workplace-based) Arc sub-regions currently rank between
44th �Milton Keynes) and 376th �Bedfordshire) of the 1,214 EU-25 NUTS 3 regions �These
are regions defined by the European Union based on population. NUTS 3 regions have a
population of between 150,000 and 800,000).
2.19 Oxford and Cambridge’s rankings of 86th and 138th in Europe do not reflect their strong
knowledge infrastructure and innovation assets and the study considered a number of
primary drivers of productivity growth, including skills, enterprise and innovation. The data
shows that productivity levels are highest in Milton Keynes, Oxfordshire, and
Cambridgeshire and generally lower elsewhere in the centre of the Arc. Moreover
productivity growth rates have been higher of late in Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire than
elsewhere. Figure 2.1 shows relative workplace productivity growth in relation to workplace
employment growth.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 9
Figure 2.1: Productivity & Employment Growth in the ARC, 1998-2003
Employment & Productivity Growth in the ARC, 98-03
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Oxfordshire
Cambridgeshire
East Midlands
Buckinghamshire
South East
ARC
Bedfordshire
Eastern
GB
Milton Keynes
Northamptonshire
Luton
Average Annual Growth 1998-2003 �%)
Employment
Productivity*
Source: Oxford2Cambridge Arc, 2006
2.20 The analysis showed that the Arc’s performance is sub-optimal and that there is a
significant room for improvement in all parts of the Arc. The above analysis highlights that:
• The Arc’s performance is sub-optimal;
• Global competitiveness pressures are growing;
• There are specific constraints in various parts of the Arc; and
• Various parts of the Arc have complementary assets.
2.21 Based on the review of the economic assessment of the Arc and its asset base, a revised
O2C Arc strategic framework has been set out for “Smart Growth Solutions” for:
• Building the smart growth coalition;
• Accelerating productivity and growth; and
• Creating smart places.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 10
2.22 The key recommendations for the framework included:
• All Arc smart growth solutions require strong institutional and political leadership;
• The Arc needs to demonstrate ‘tangible value’ of the Arc initiative to a private sector
and HEIs;
• Develop the Arc’s integrated solution to sign-post the technological and research
community towards appropriate support for commercialisation of ideas;
• Based on a robust evidence base, the Arc must influence the human capital policies,
programmes and initiatives of the public training and education agencies by
consulting, supporting and advocating; and
• Smart places should be promoted through the growth and development of knowledge-
based sustainable growth hubs – including sustainable housing and employment
communities.
Milton Keynes Local Plan 2001-2011
2.23 The Local Plan was adopted in December 2005 and will be replaced by the emerging LDF.
In terms of employment land and allocations there are specific policies which look to
manage the growth of employment in Milton Keynes.
2.24 Policy E1- Protection of Existing Employment Land looks to refuse planning permission for
a change of use or redevelopment of any land identified for employment use on the
Proposals Map to any other purposes, unless there was no conflict with existing or
potential neighbouring uses and one of the following ‘tests’:
• The proposal would result in a significant reduction in the detrimental environmental
impact of an existing use; or
• The proposed use is one that cannot be satisfactorily accommodated other than in an
employment areas; or
• The proposed use will not significantly reduce the provision of local employment
opportunities.
2.25 Notwithstanding this, a recent application on an allocated employment site for residential
development has been accepted by the Local Authority and planning permission granted.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 11
2.26 Remaining undeveloped employment land stock in the former Designated Area and new
allocations in the City Expansion Areas equate to 301.0ha from a total designated amount
of 981.4ha �this does not however include any information on CMK). The designated
Expansion Areas total 117.2ha of vacant land with B1, B2 and B8 uses being specified.
Table 2.1 shows the full list of employment sites not currently developed in Milton Keynes:
Table 2.1 Employment Land Allocations in Milton Keynes City (2006)1
Grid Square / Area Gross Area (hectares)
Vacant Land (hectares)
Use Class
Broughton /Atterbury 18.2 16.5 B1/B2/B8/C2
Caldecotte 14.7 4.2 B1/B8/C2
Bletchley - Denbigh2 32.4 9.3 B1/B2/B8
Kents Hill North 5.2 5.2
Kiln Farm 51.2 1.1 B1/B2/B8
Knowlhill 33.1 10.0 B1/B2/B8
Linford Wood 39.1 7.0 B1
Mount Farm 48.0 1.9 B1/B2/B8
Old Wolverton 40.1 1.9 B2/B8
Redmoor 13.4 3.3 B2/B8
Rooksley 21.4 1.3 B1/B2/B8
Shenley Wood 37.4 25.3 B1/B2/B8/C2/D1
Tattenhoe / Snelshall East 16.0 8.5 B1/B2/B8
Tattenhoe Park / Snellshall West 20.6 1.1 B1/B2/B8/C1
Tongwell 52.1 1.4 B2/B8
Walton 26.3 15.9 B1/B2/B8
Waverndon Gate 13.9 9.2 B1C2/D1
West Ashland 7.0 7.0 B1/B2/B8
1 Note – These figures do not form the basis of our subsequent analysis in Chapter 6 – these are based on more recent datasets that have been received from both Milton Keynes Partnership and Milton Keynes Council. Alterations to these datasets have been agreed with the Client. 2 This figure includes areas at Newton Leys �7ha), Old Bletchley, West Bletchley, and Denbigh Hall
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 12
Grid Square / Area Gross Area (hectares)
Vacant Land (hectares)
Use Class
Winterhill 0.92 0.92 B1/B2/B8
Wolverton 37.0 2.4 B1/B2/B8
Wolverton Mill 35.4 8.7 B1/B2/B8
Wymbush 25.4 1.9 B1/B2/B8
Eastern Expansion Area �Site MK1) 97.0 97.0 B2/B8
Western Expansion Area �Site MK2) 16.8 16.8 B1
Northern Expansion Area �Site MK3) 3.4 3.4 B1/B2/B8
CMK 276.27 40.7 B1
TOTAL (hectares) 981.37 301.0
Source: Milton Keynes Council, 2006
2.27 New employment development will normally be given planning permission in the areas
which have been allocated for employment purposes. In considering proposals a number
of factors will be taken into account including the details in the above table, the physical
and locational attributes of sites, the need of a variety of sites to meet the differing
requirements of a wide range of employment uses and any employment proposals on sites
other than those listed will be assessed against Policy E2.
2.28 The majority of employment allocations have been made in the city, with a small site being
allocated for B1 use in Olney. There are no new allocations proposed in the Key
Settlements of Newport Pagnell, or Woburn Sands. However, in Newport Pagnell and
Woburn the closure of existing manufacturing plants could give rise to replacement sites
which would add to the stock of employment land.
2.29 Employment development �Policy E4) promotes employment uses within Town, District
and Local Centres provided that there is no detrimental effect on the surrounding areas
due to the development.
2.30 In terms of employment land uses in the rural areas of Milton Keynes, permission will be
granted for any activities which diversify those farming activities and those that may be
ancillary to agricultural activities.
2.31 As well as providing employment land allocations, the Local Plan considers the
implications of those people who work from home. Although this is currently a very small
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 13
proportion of the working population, working from home is a trend, which could increase in
the future with significant advances in technology. If planning permission is required for
business use within a dwelling then it will be granted as long as the property continues to
be primarily a dwelling, it is only for the employment of the occupier, it does not adversely
effect the amenities of adjacent residents and the character of the area and that adequate
parking is available.
2.32 Another objective for consideration but not of any great significance in terms of
employment land is the protection of small business units through refusing permission for
any change of use and expansion or redevelopment of small units into larger units.
2.33 A final key objective and the focus of two policies for employment in the Local Plan is large
footprint employment. This is due to wholesale distribution and logistics accounting for a
significant percentage of jobs in Milton Keynes, and it suggested that this sector will grow
in the future.
2.34 Policy E12 stipulates that about 80 ha of land east of Kingston and north of the A421 is
allocated for large footprint employment development.
Central-CMK Framework SPG
2.35 This Supplementary Planning Guidance was adopted in March 2003 to provide guidance
for the development of the Central CMK area. In terms of policies at the national level
which have an impact on Central CMK these include PPS1: Delivering Sustainable
Development �2005); PPS6: Planning for Town Centres and PPG13: Transport. All these
documents set out key principles, which try to ensure development contributes to
sustainable environments. In particular to focus development that attracts a large number
of people, especially retail, leisure and office development, in existing centres to promote
their vitality and viability and more sustainable patterns of development.
2.36 Regional Planning Guidance for the South East �RPG9) promotes that urban areas should
be the main foci of development through making them more attractive, accessible, and
better able to attract investment. Access to employment, services, leisure and cultural
facilities should be less dependant on travelling long distances and should be accessible
through normal travel needs such as walking, cycling and public transport.
2.37 The vision of the Central CMK Framework is to create a high quality environment for
employment and the local community. Catering for local business will contribute to the
success of the local economy and spread economic employment benefits.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 14
2.38 To keep in line with providing a good quality environment for both businesses and the
community, it is important to introduce mixed-use development on sites in the centre of
CMK. With this in mind they have set the following parameters to apply to all development,
that within the Central Areas, larger developments for business �B1) and retail �A1, A2, A3
and A4) purposes will be sought in the form of integrated mixed use development.
2.39 Specifically for commercial purposes, and employment land implications, the provision of
office space as a component of mixed-use development will be encouraged in the Central
Area. Serviced accommodation and managed business suites are appropriate on the
upper levels of mixed-use schemes.
2.40 As a result of introducing new development in the CMK area, surface level car parking will
be used for further development and replacement parking will be provided in the form of
multi-storey, on-street and courtyard, built to Safer Parking Standards.
2.41 In terms of access and movement, Central CMK should reflect its function as a primary
pedestrian and public transport route. Saxon Gate, which is part of the core pedestrian
route will need to be improved to ensure better public transport and that cyclists and
pedestrians are able to use this safely and easily. Existing road space will be considered
for allocation to buses and the general quantum of surface car parking will be reduced to
be replaced by multi-storey car parks. They will only be retained at surface levels if it can
be demonstrated there is a need.
2.42 As a final point of observation there are two sites within the framework, which have been
identified for development of new multi storey car parks, however these are now under
review and are likely to change. Sites 8a and 8b Saxon Gate South and Saxon Gate North
were both identified to deliver one of the principle multi-storey car parks as a gateway
structure into CMK in order to meet anticipated requirements in terms of capacity, which is
estimated at being in excess of 2000 cars.
New Town to International City (DTZ)
2.43 This report, prepared by DTZ Pieda Consulting in conjunction with the Milton Keynes
Economy and Learning Partnership �MKELP) outlines the vision for Milton Keynes to move
through its transition from a New Town to an International City.
2.44 In May 2002, the reported population of Milton Keynes was around 210,000 people with
around 122,000 people employed in the town. This equated to a ratio of around 2:1, which
is far removed from the aspirational ratio of 1:1. The anticipated population growth to 2031
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 15
is projected to be around 68,600 and this growth can only be sustainable if an equal
amount of new jobs are created in parallel within Milton Keynes.
2.45 The DTZ report identifies a vision for Milton Keynes stating that “in 2034 Milton Keynes will
be a major free standing city, with a diverse, high value business base offering well paid
employment opportunities to all those living within the city”. The Vision comprises a
number of elements, which will underpin, support and enable the transition of Milton
Keynes from town to city.
2.46 The report states that Milton Keynes will have a diverse employment base, with many
employers in a broad range of employment sectors, but with a focus on those industries in
the knowledge based and higher value added service manufacturing sectors. By 2034,
Milton Keynes as a city will provide sufficient jobs for all those who live in the city and for
many people in the city’s surrounding rural areas and wider hinterland.
2.47 The DTZ report does not however relate the scale and spatial distribution of the supply of
employment land to the projected growth that is anticipated within Milton Keynes,
something that is addressed through this report.
2.48 One of the key drivers behind the growth of employment within Milton Keynes is the
product that Milton Keynes can offer compared with the rest of the MKSM sub-region and
further away. These products include advantages for employers such as lower rental
values and greater accessibility, and it is hoped that attracting additional headquarter and
professional office based employment will deliver a number of benefits to Milton Keynes,
including an expansion in the number of jobs in the town.
2.49 Increases in the number of research and development based industries are seen as critical
to securing the development base within Milton Keynes as this will enable the future city to
be able to compete for potential employees in the growing employment sectors.
2.50 The DTZ report recognises that at present the level of skills within the Milton Keynes
workforce can be, at best, described as average, as shown in the Socio-Economic
Baseline section of this chapter. If this is not addressed this could be a major barrier to the
economic development of the city. However, change on the scale of that proposed for
Milton Keynes takes time and cannot be achieved overnight. In the short term, the skills of
the workforce will need to be enhanced in order to attract companies in the growing
employment sectors and this can only be done through attracting better skilled people to
live within the city.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 16
2.51 In the medium to longer term the skills of the existing population can be taught through the
provision of better tertiary education facilities in the city and ensuring that the quality of life
offer within Milton Keynes is of such a level that many of those students who choose to
come to Milton Keynes, also choose to stay after they finish their studies. The continued
presence of Milton Keynes University and Cranfield University, which currently provide
tertiary education within the District, are paramount to achieving this aim.
2.52 The Information and Communication Technology �ICT) infrastructure within Milton Keynes
continues to be a major driver of employment growth within the city. The distribution and
type of broadband internet cables across Milton Keynes varies widely, with some parts of
the town having access to high speed broadband internet connections, whilst other areas
do not.
Previous Employment Land Reports
2.53 In 2001, Halcrow Group Ltd undertook an employment land study of the Milton Keynes
Travel to Work Area �TTWA) which informed the Milton Keynes Local Plan review process.
The Halcrow study had two objectives:
• To determine whether there was enough land of the right characteristics to meet
forecast demand for B1, B2 and B8 employment uses to 2011; and
• To advise on any employment land allocations that were considered to be potentially
unviable in terms of market demand.
2.54 In terms of approach the Halcrow study undertook both supply-side and demand-side
assessments, which included appraisals of both existing and potential employment land,
job forecasts and a market review, as well as an extensive employment land forecasting
process and the application of typologies to determine the types of premises that could be
created in the Milton Keynes Travel to Work Area �TTWA).
2.55 The study confirmed that Milton Keynes has a wide “sphere of influence”, which attracts
commuters from the surrounding areas where there are relatively smaller settlements and
a less significant employment base.
2.56 The Halcrow study undertook two separate demand-side assessments, one using a “land
based” methodology and the other using local economic sectors and job densities to
determine land requirements. The land based method calculated that demand for
employment land within Milton Keynes TTWA would be in the region of 278 hectares to
2011, whilst the economic sector / job density method calculated demand to be in the
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 17
region of 289 hectares. The Local Plan allocated between 352 – 362 hectares to 2011,
meaning that there was effectively a further four years of employment land within Milton
Keynes TTWA taking them up to 2015. This Study has identified a total supply of
employment land in the order of 330ha, slightly less than was allocated, however this may
be due to sites being developed or removed from the portfolio. Further details of the
portfolio of sites included in this Study can be found at Chapter 4. This Study has also
calculated that there is a deficit of employment land to 2011, with some 9.6 ha required for
office / technology developments and around 52 ha required for industrial / distribution
developments, which contradicts the Halcrow work. This difference may be due to
differences in the demand forecasting model used, or indeed a change in the availability of
employment land over the next 5 years. More details of this shortfall in supply can be found
in Chapter 6.
2.57 With regard to employment densities, the report recognises that present day Milton Keynes
has relatively low job densities due to the way in which the area has evolved, which has
lead to low building heights, generous car parking standards and significant areas of
strategic landscaping. In the future employment densities within CMK could be much
higher than those used in the forecast model and this could reduce the overall demand for
employment land by up to 100ha. This is an issue also addressed in this report.
2.58 In order to achieve higher employment densities within Milton Keynes, the report suggests
a number of proactive measures:
• The parking standards for vehicles within the Local Plan should be treated as a
maximum level of provision;
• Investigate the potential for areas of underground car parking in order to enable
greater opportunities for increasing footprints of development; and
• Promoting more efficient use of internal floorspace.
2.59 In terms of marketability the report identifies that over the next 30 years a significant
amount of all future B1 office development will be concentrated within the city centre,
together with significant improvements in public transport infrastructure. In addition, the
development of a number of large footprint developments are suggested in order to cope
with demand, particularly in the B2 / B8 sectors for large footprint buildings, particularly in
the eastern area of Milton Keynes adjacent to the M1 motorway junction. Notwithstanding
this growth, the study also recognises that the motorway junctions that serve Milton
Keynes are already at capacity and improvements would need to be made in order that
these would be able to cope with the forecasted additional traffic movements.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 18
2.60 In conclusion the report identities that in principle, the Milton Keynes TTWA has an
adequate supply of employment land to 2011, and potentially beyond if there is a surplus.
However, the report states that there will need to be regular monitoring to ensure that
employment land allocations that are weak in terms of marketability still have the potential
to come forward for development. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of this employment
land is crucial, as many B2 / B8 businesses prefer to be located adjacent to the M1
motorway junctions. This is creating pressure not only on the supply of land within the
eastern sector of Milton Keynes but also on the capacity of the motorway junctions
themselves.
Socio-Economic Baseline Review
2.61 This section provides an analysis of relevant baseline socio-economic datasets, which
helps to gain an understanding of the social and economic situation within Milton Keynes.
The data that is analysed in this section includes the age of the population, proportion of
the population that are economically active, household composition and travel to work
data.
Population Structure
2.62 The age structure of the population in Milton Keynes is shown below. Similar data for the
South East region and England is provided for comparison.
Figure 2.3 – Age Structure of Milton Keynes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Milton Keynes South East England
65+50-6422-4916-21Under 16
Source: Census, 200� and GVA Grimley analysis
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 19
2.63 As can be seen above, Milton Keynes has a higher than average number of residents aged
under 16 and also aged between 22 – 49. Around 23% of the population are aged under
16, compared with 20% regionally and nationally, whilst 44% are aged between 22 – 49,
compared with 39% regionally and nationally. This suggests a population structure with
higher than average proportions of young and middle aged families compared with the
region and nationally. There are also less than average percentages of older people, those
aged over 65 years of age. In Milton Keynes around 10% of the population are aged over
65, compared with the regional and national average of 16%.
2.64 Over the timescale of this study it is likely there will be higher than average numbers of
elderly people �65+) and those aged 50-64, resulting in an ageing population.
Economic Structure
2.65 The economic structure of Milton Keynes is shown below, along with that of the South East
and England for comparison.
Figure 2.4 – Economic Structure (Residents) within Milton Keynes
Milton KeynesSouth East
England
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Elementary Occupations
Process; Plant and Machine Operatives
Sales and Customer Service Occupations
Personal Service Occupations
Skilled Trades Occupations
Administrative and Secretarial Occupations
Associate Professional and TechnicalOccupationsProfessional Occupations
Managers and Senior Officials
Source: Census, 200� and GVA Grimley analysis
*Note: Examples of elementary occupations include Farm Workers, Labourers, Kitchen Assistants and Bar Staff
2.66 It can be seen above that the range of job types taken by residents within Milton Keynes
are broadly similar to those seen at the regional and national level. There are however
some differences of note. Around 9% of Milton Keynes’ population are employed in skilled
trades, slightly less than the regional and national average of 11% and 12% respectively.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 20
Conversely there are slightly more people living in Milton Keynes employed in elementary
occupations with around 13%, compared with the regional average of 10%.
2.67 In terms of the workplace population of Milton Keynes, the basic economic structure is
shown below.
Figure 2.5 – Economic Structure (Workplace Population) within Milton Keynes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Milton Keynes South East England
On state benefit, unemployed, lowestgrade workers
Semi-skilled and unskilled manualworkers
Skilled manual workers
Supervisory, clerical, juniormanagerial / administrative /professionalHigher and intermediate managerial /administrative / professional
Source: Census, 200� and GVA Grimley analysis
2.68 As can be seen above, the majority of people who work in Milton Keynes work in higher
managerial, professional, supervisory and administrative roles, with these occupations
accounting for around 64%, slightly higher than the regional average of 61% and the
national average of 59%. As a result there are fewer skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled
manual workers in the district - a total of 35%, compared with 38% regionally and 40%
nationally. It is clear therefore, that Milton Keynes is already able to attract a high
proportion of highly skilled jobs to the area, however it is questionable as to whether the
people fulfilling these roles live within the district or commute in. This point is highlighted in
more detail at section 2.77.
Earnings
2.69 The figure below shows the resident and workplace earnings for Milton Keynes, compared
against the regional and national averages and for two comparitor cities, Northampton and
Luton.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 21
Figure 2.6 – Earnings within Milton Keynes and the Surrounding Area
370
380
390
400
410
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
MiltonKeynes
Luton Northampton South East Great Britain
Gro
ss w
eekl
y pa
y (£
)
Residence EarningsWorkplace Earnings
Source: Nomis (Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE)), 2005 & GVA Grimley analysis
2.70 The figure above shows that the residents of Milton Keynes earn, on average, around £15
per week less than those workers who commute into Milton Keynes. Similarly, residents of
Luton earn around £13 less per week than those working in Luton. This pattern is opposite
to that seen across the rest of the South East region and highlights an interesting point that
people who commute in places such as Milton Keynes and Luton are usually working in
the more highly skilled, better paid jobs compared with the people who live in those places.
In places such as Northampton, whose residents earn around £12 more than those
working there; it is likely that these residents are commuting to places such as Milton
Keynes in order to earn higher incomes.
Economic Activity
2.71 The economic activity rate of Milton Keynes, the South East and England are shown
below.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 22
Figure 2.7 – Economic Activity Rate within Milton Keynes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Economically Active Unemployed Economically Inactive
Milton KeynesSouth EastEngland
Source: Census, 200� and GVA Grimley analysis
2.72 As can be seen above Milton Keynes has a higher than average population who are
economically active, with around 72% of the population aged 16-74. This compares with an
average of 68% in the South East and 64% overall. Unemployment in Milton Keynes is
slightly higher than the regional average of 2%, but on a par with the national average of
3%. The data indicates that there is already a healthy workforce resident within the District,
the next section looks at how skilled these workers are.
Skills
2.73 In terms of measuring the skills of the economically active population, one indicator is to
analyse the qualifications of residents. The qualifications of the population of Milton
Keynes are shown below, along with the South East and England for comparison.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 23
Figure 2.8 – Qualifications of Resident Population
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
No qua
lifica
tions
Leve
l 1 qu
alific
ation
s
Leve
l 2 qu
alific
ations
Leve
l 3 qu
alific
ation
s
Leve
l 4 / 5
quali
ficati
ons
Leve
l unk
nown
Milton KeynesSouth EastEngland
Source: Census, 200� and GVA Grimley analysis
2.74 As can be seen above Milton Keynes has a relatively smaller proportion of highly skilled
residents, compared with the rest of the South East in particular and to a lesser extent, the
rest of England. The percentage of residents with Level 3 qualifications, that is those
residents whose highest qualification attained is 2+ 'A' levels; 4+ 'AS' levels; Higher School
Certificate; NVQ level 3; or Advanced GNVQ within Milton Keynes is 8%, slightly lower
than the regional average of 9%. The percentage of residents with Level 4 / 5
qualifications, those whose highest qualification attained is a first degree, postgraduate
qualification, teachers and professional medical staff in Milton Keynes is around 19%, less
than the regional average of 22% and slightly lower than the national average of 20%.
2.75 Conversely the majority of Milton Keynes’ population have Level 2 qualifications or below.
Level 2 qualifications are equivalent to 5 GCSE passes at Grade C or above. Altogther
around 43% of the population have Level 1 or 2 qualifications, compared with 38%
regionally and 36% nationally.
2.76 Overall, Milton Keynes’ population have at best, an average skills base, which means that
they are not entirely suited to the types of businesses Milton Keynes are looking to attract,
these being more knowledge based. The next section looks at how far the people who
work in Milton Keynes travel to work, in order to gain an understanding of commuting
patterns within the District.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 24
Travel to Work
2.77 The travel to work data for Milton Keynes is shown below, along with the data for the South
East and England and a number of local comparitor towns. These help to highlight some of
the patterns of commuting that are unique within Milton Keynes.
2.78 Figure 2.9 – Distance Travelled to Work – Resident Population
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Milton K
eyne
s
Bedfor
dLu
ton
Northa
mpton
South
East
Englan
d
No fixed place of work60km and over40km to less than 60km30km to less than 40km20km to less than 30km10km to less than 20km5km to less than 10km2km to less than 5kmLess than 2kmWorks mainly at or from home
Source: Census, 200� and GVA Grimley analysis
2.79 It can be seen above that around 50% of the population of Milton Keynes travel less than
5km to their place of work. This shows that a high proportion of the population work within
the district and although this mirrors trends seen regionally and nationally, it is slightly
lower than the proportion of residents in nearby towns such as Bedford, Northampton and
Luton. Around one fifth �22%) of the working population travel between 5 – 10km to their
place of work indicating that they may commute within Milton Keynes or to nearby places
such as Bletchley and Newport Pagnell.
2.80 The figure below highlights the travel to work data for Milton Keynes’ workforce, along with
data for the South East, England and comparitor towns.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 25
Figure 2.10 – Distance Travelled to Work – Workforce Population
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Milton Key
nes
Bedfor
dLu
ton
Northam
pton
South
East
Englan
d
60km and over40km to less than 60km30km to less than 40km20km to less than 30km10km to less than 20km5km to less than 10km2km to less than 5kmLess than 2kmWorks mainly at or from home
Source: Census, 200� and GVA Grimley analysis
2.81 The figure above shows that the workforce population of Milton Keynes, on average, travel
further to work than people working elsewhere in the region and to a lesser extent,
elsewhere in England. Of those people working in Milton Keynes, just 49% travel less than
5km to their place of work, compared with 56% regionally and 54% nationally. Almost 1 in
5 people �19%) working in Milton Keynes travel more than 20km to their place of work, this
is compared with 15% in the South East and 13% in England.
2.82 It can be seen from the analysis above that Milton Keynes has a commuter based
workforce, who mainly travel from outside the city to their place of work. The relatively high
percentage of commuters travelling between 20km – 30km to their place of work within
Milton Keynes suggests that many workers are coming from nearby conurbations such as
Northampton �approximately 30km drive), Bedford �approximately 27km drive) and
Leighton Buzzard �approximately 21km drive).
2.83 The figure below shows the split of modes of transport used by people working in Milton
Keynes and compares these with the comparitor cities and the regional and national
averages.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 26
Figure 2.11 – Mode of Transport Used to Work – Workforce Population
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Milt
onK
eyne
s
Bed
ford
Luto
n
Nor
tham
pton
Sou
th E
ast
Eng
land
Work from Home
Walking / Cycling
Public Transport
Other Motorised PrivateTransportCar or Van
Source: Census, 200� and GVA Grimley analysis
2.84 The figure above highlights Milton Keynes’ workforce population reliance on the motor car,
with 63% of all workers using their car / van to get to work. This is in comparison with an
average of 56% in Luton, 59% in the South East and 55% nationally. Just 8% of
commuters use public transport, compared with a national average of 12%.
2.85 This travel to work data highlights one of the main problems that Milton Keynes may face if
there is to be a significant increase in the resident and workforce population of the district,
with a higher than average proportion of people using their cars to get to work.
Household Formation
2.86 The composition of households can give an indication as to the nature of the population,
whether it be a young, growing population, or an older declining one. The household
composition data for Milton Keynes can be seen below. Data for the South East and
England is given for comparison.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 27
Figure 2.12 – Household Composition in Milton Keynes
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Milton Keynes South East England
One person householdsTwo Adults with no ChildrenTwo Adults with ChildrenLone Parent HouseholdsOther Households
Source: Census, 200� and GVA Grimley analysis
2.87 The analysis above shows that within Milton Keynes there are slightly higher than average
proportions of households comprising two adults with a number of dependent children, with
31% of all households in Milton Keynes, compared with 28% in the South East and 27%
nationally. This supports the population data presented earlier that showed Milton Keynes
as having a higher than average number of people aged between 22 – 49. The fact that
there are two person households with a number of children would tend to support this.
Job Density
2.88 Jobs density is defined as the number of filled jobs in an area divided by the working-age
population resident in that area and a job density of greater than 1 represents an area that
is experiencing inward commuting. The average job density figures for Milton Keynes and
the surrounding area are shown below.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 28
Figure 2.13 – Job Density in Milton Keynes and surrounding areas
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Milton Keynes Bedford Luton Northampton South East Great Britain
Num
ber o
f Fill
ed J
obs
/ Wor
king
Age
Pop
ulat
ion
Source: NOMIS, 2006
2.89 The jobs density in Milton Keynes is around 1.04, way above the national average of 0.83.
This indicates there are around 5% more people working in Milton Keynes than actually
live there �working age people only). Compared with other towns in the local area, only
Northampton shares this trend, with a jobs density of 1.11. The other towns in the local
area all have a jobs density of less than 1 �they are all around 0.8) showing that they have
a smaller workforce than the number of jobs in the same area.
2.90 While areas with relatively high jobs densities clearly offer potential job opportunities for
residents of the area, it may be the case that there is a mismatch between the type of jobs
in an area and the skills of the people living there, as discussed in section 2.65 above.
Furthermore, Milton Keynes’ situation as a net importer of people means that it will
experience the same sorts of issues relating to sustainability as other larger cities such as
Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds.
Dwelling to Worker Ratio
2.91 The ratio of dwellings to workers within Milton Keynes and comparison areas �South East
and England) is shown below.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 29
Table 2.2 – Dwelling to Worker Ratios
Milton Keynes South East England Total Employment 108,075 3,888,756 22,441,497No of Dwellings 86,479 3,391,833 21,206,804Ratio of Workers : Dwellings 1.2:1 1.1:1 1.1:1 Source: Census, 200� and GVA Grimley analysis
2.92 As can be seen in the analysis above, the average worker to dwelling ratio in Milton
Keynes is 1.2:1, well above the regional and national average of 1.1:1. This suggests that
Milton Keynes has a high ratio of dwellings with one or more economically active residents.
This could reflect house types �larger homes), a relatively young �but of working age
population) and smaller numbers of retired persons. This large pool of labour highlights
the extent of jobs available locally given the data in Figure 2.13 which suggests that jobs
outnumber the economically active creating a need for in commuting to satisfy this level of
economic activity.
2.93 A major issue looking towards 2031 is the nature of additional housing. If it follows existing
characteristics it will provide a large pool of economically active residents within the labour
market.
Milton Keynes Development Overview
2.94 As part of this baseline it is of value to set out what the key differences are between Milton
Keynes and other major urban areas and indeed other new towns. Milton Keynes in
planning and development terms is a unique example of urban development for the
following reasons:
• Milton Keynes is a planned town based around a centre but with dispersed growth
around it. Whilst this is typical of new towns it is not an urban form commonly found in
the UK;
• The City has experienced tremendous growth with population expanding from 64,0003
at the establishment of the New Town to 178,300 in 1991 and an approximate figure
today of 218,0004. Employment has also expanded rapidly rising from 95,000 in 1994
to 115,700 in 20065. It is unlikely that any significant urban area in the UK has
experienced this level of growth in the period;
3 Milton Keynes Official City Atlas, 2006 4 Nomis, 2007 5 Nomis, 2007
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 30
• Growth is expected to continue over the next 25 years with an additional 68,600 new
homes and an equivalent level of new jobs;
• The City’s growth has been guided by the public sector and importantly public
ownership of land evolving from the New Town Corporation, Commission for New
Towns and now English Partnerships. Today, through the Milton Keynes Partnership
�MKP) Milton Keynes Council and English Partnerships have created a vehicle to
steer growth. The previous dominance of the public sector in terms of land holdings is
likely to change as expansion increasingly takes place on land in private ownerships
with the planning system being the major key mechanism for guiding development.
Nevertheless in locations such as Central Milton Keynes, the public sector will remain
the major landowner. These changing circumstances are reflected in the remit of
Milton Keynes Partnerships which now focuses much more upon the promotion of
development opportunities; and
• The land market in Milton Keynes reflects the high degree of public ownerships with
controlled releases of land. The impact of the employment land and space market has
been to limit the extent of speculative development. This reflects a nervousness
regarding speculative development on a significant scale and the impact numerous
“To Let” signs would have on market confidence. Whilst in some ways such issues
play a role in other land markets these are controlled by market mechanisms rather
than by control over the disposal of land or the type of development upon it. However
it should be recognised that large estate owners, both in the public and private sector,
often share similar approaches. Such an example would be the Calthorpe Estate in
Birmingham which carefully controls the type and extent of development on land within
its control.
2.95 Clearly Milton Keynes reflects an unusual set of circumstances with high levels of past and
anticipated growth and a transition from public sector control of land development to one
where the public sector through MKP promotes growth and targets key sectors, whilst the
spatial pattern of development is controlled through the planning system.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 31
3. PROPERTY MARKET REVIEW 3.1 Milton Keynes was designated a New Town in 1967 and has probably been the most
successful. It is equi-distant from London and the Midlands and is served by Junction 13
and 14 of the M1. It also has a very good train service with journey times to London Euston
of approximately 36 minutes and Birmingham New Street of 58 minutes.
3.2 This Chapter looks at the demand and supply for office and business park accommodation
in Milton Keynes, and seeks to project how the demand for employment land might change
in the future.
Offices
3.3 The office market in Milton Keynes falls into three categories. The “town centre” type
buildings are situated in the central area, known as Central Milton Keynes �CMK). Most of
the remaining office buildings outside the central area tend to be classed together in
Business Parks such as Linford Wood or Caldecotte Lakes, or stand alone complexes for
owner occupiers such as EDS and Abbey.
3.4 Milton Keynes can be easily described as an average office centre, similar in size to
Croydon, with approximately 130,000 employees recorded at the end of 2003. The
economy is extremely diverse and is not reliant upon any specific sector for its
employment.
3.5 Milton Keynes has an estimated office stock of approximately 7 million sq ft. There was
very little office development prior to its designation as a New Town in 1967, and so there
are few old buildings which have become outdated and suitable for demolition or change of
use. On average, approximately 140,000 sq ft of new space has been completed each
year in Milton Keynes for the last 20 years. However, this has been influenced by cycles in
the market and until recently there had been no new development in CMK since 2002. As
such, all development carried out since 2002 has been in out of town locations. Invest
Milton Keynes currently estimate the stock of vacant office space to be 86,000 sqm
�923,000 sq ft).
3.6 The extent of development activity for offices is illustrated in Figure 3.1 overleaf.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 32
Figure 3.1 – New Buildings – Office Floorspace in Milton Keynes
New Buildings - Office Floorspace in Milton Keynes
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Floo
rspa
ce (m
2 )
OfficeOffice - CMK
Source: Invest MK, 2006
Central Milton Keynes (CMK)
3.7 It is readily apparent that recent office growth has taken place outside CMK. This reflects
the review of CMK strategy 2001 – 2003 which did allow for small investments to take up
space. The CMK area is arranged on a grid pattern with the railway station on the western
edge connected by Silbury, Midsummer and Avebury Boulevards to the main shopping
area in the east. The early office buildings of the 1970’s and early 1980’s are somewhat
anonymous but tend to be large multi-storey glass clad buildings providing large floor
plates and good natural daylight. The developments of the late 1980’s and 1990’s have
arguably been less bland and more individual in appearance.
3.8 Within CMK large current availability is estimated to be in excess of 700,000 sq ft, or about
10% of the stock in Milton Keynes6. This consists almost entirely of older 1970’s buildings
with large albeit shallow floorplates which do not necessarily suit modern occupiers.
Typical examples include Elder House and Station House in Station Square where there is
approximately 100,000 sq ft currently available.
3.9 There is one speculative scheme under construction at the present time which is the
development by Frontier Estates of the first phase of CBX3 on Midsummer Boulevard. This
will provide two Hotels �3 and 4 star), 45,000 sq ft of speculative offices, and for the first
time on this scale in the heart of CMK, 392 apartments, 84 serviced apartments and
6 PROMIS 2006
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 33
approximately 85,000 sq ft of specialist retail, cafes, bars and restaurants. The office
scheme is due for completion later this year. Quoted rental levels for office space are £19
per sq ft, if achieved these would represent a new bench mark for rentals in the city centre.
3.10 The early proposals for CMK included extensive free car parking in front of the office
buildings, with private parking to the rear. In recent years policy has changed, and most of
the ‘free parking’ is now pay and display. The vision is for MK to become less car
dependent with high density mixed use development in the centre, and multi-storey car
parks on the fringe. As such new town centre office schemes will have lower car parking
ratios, and this may well lead to increased demand for the out of town business parks.
Out of Town
3.11 Outside of CMK there are two types of office development. These consist of either
business parks designed for a number of users or stand alone complexes for owner
occupiers such as the Wavendon Tower facility which is under construction for EDS at
Brinklow.
3.12 The largest out of town area is to the north of CMK at Linford Wood. The majority of the
space at this development is office and hi-tech with occupiers such as Data Research
Services, Hayes Logistics and NEC.
3.13 To the north east lies Willen Lakes which is home to Siemens, and beyond that Atterbury
Lakes which has good access to junction 14 of the M1. The main location to the south is
Caldecotte Lakes Business Park, which commenced in 1990 and has attracted Rockwell
and Daimler Chrysler amongst others. Further to the south west, at Shenley Wood, there is
a 200,000 sq ft office complex for Abbey and a speculative development called Shenley
Pavilions which is multi-let.
3.14 More than two thirds of the current office availability in Milton Keynes is located out of
town. Much of the consented space for out of town has been granted to occupiers seeking
extensions to existing facilities. Examples include Abbey with a 200,000 sq ft consent at
Shenley Wood, Data Research Services, VW Audi and Taylor Nacanco.
3.15 Consented speculative schemes include Dencora’s 63,000 sq ft Brooklands scheme at
Linford Wood and Wilson Bowden’s 59,500 sq ft scheme at Eastlake Park. These locations
are shown at Figure 3.2 below.
East
lake
Par
kEa
stla
ke P
ark
East
lake
Par
kEa
stla
ke P
ark
East
lake
Par
kEa
stla
ke P
ark
East
lake
Par
kEa
stla
ke P
ark
East
lake
Par
k
Cal
deco
tte L
akes
Bus
ines
s Pa
rkC
alde
cotte
Lak
es B
usin
ess
Park
Cal
deco
tte L
akes
Bus
ines
s Pa
rkC
alde
cotte
Lak
es B
usin
ess
Park
Cal
deco
tte L
akes
Bus
ines
s Pa
rkC
alde
cotte
Lak
es B
usin
ess
Park
Cal
deco
tte L
akes
Bus
ines
s Pa
rkC
alde
cotte
Lak
es B
usin
ess
Park
Cal
deco
tte L
akes
Bus
ines
s Pa
rk
Shen
ley
Woo
dSh
enle
y W
ood
Shen
ley
Woo
dSh
enle
y W
ood
Shen
ley
Woo
dSh
enle
y W
ood
Shen
ley
Woo
dSh
enle
y W
ood
Shen
ley
Woo
d
Linf
ord
Woo
dLi
nfor
d W
ood
Linf
ord
Woo
dLi
nfor
d W
ood
Linf
ord
Woo
dLi
nfor
d W
ood
Linf
ord
Woo
dLi
nfor
d W
ood
Linf
ord
Woo
dW
illen
Lak
esW
illen
Lak
esW
illen
Lak
esW
illen
Lak
esW
illen
Lak
esW
illen
Lak
esW
illen
Lak
esW
illen
Lak
esW
illen
Lak
es
MIL
TON
KEY
NES
PAR
TNER
SHIP
- M
ILTO
N K
EYN
ES E
MPL
OYM
ENT
SITE
S Fi
gure
3.2
- Lo
catio
n of
Rec
ent O
ffice
Dev
elop
men
ts
Rep
rodu
ced
from
Ord
nanc
e S
urve
y m
appi
ng w
ith th
e pe
rmis
sion
of H
er M
ajes
ty's
Sta
tione
ry O
ffice
. Cro
wn
Cop
yrig
ht.
Una
utho
rised
repr
oduc
tion
infri
nges
Cro
wn
Cop
yrig
ht a
nd m
ay le
ad to
pro
secu
tion
or c
ivil
proc
eedi
ngs.
Lic
ence
No.
LA
1001
9593
Key
Rec
ent D
evel
opm
ents
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 35
3.16 There is approximately 2.3 million7 sq ft of consented space within the development
pipeline, which based on development activity over the last 5 years, provides about 28
years of supply. However, most of this consented space is located out of town.
Office/Business Park Market Future Trends and Key Issues
Locational Trends
3.17 Firms may be encouraged to look for space outside the South East by the shortages of
labour now evident in many locations �where many towns have unemployment rates of
under 2%, and in some places, less than 1% of the workforce is unemployed).
3.18 Occupiers will continue to demand large buildings. Given the lack of sites in city centres,
this will continue to create demand for sizeable lettings in edge and out-of-town locations.
In London, this should help maintain demand in markets such as Paddington.
3.19 Government planning policy aims to reduce the need for travel, and in particular, the level
of car use. Planning regulations now limit the number of car parking spaces allowed at
new developments. This has increased the attractiveness of redeveloping existing space
rather than using greenfield sites, and therefore favours locations such as town centres
and major transport interchanges, rather than business parks.
Other Trends
3.20 The continued challenge of the global business environment will maintain pressure on
firms to review their office space requirements.
3.21 The quality of the working environment is likely to increase in importance, and access to
retail and leisure services will be a higher priority for employers.
3.22 It has become increasingly important to provide environmentally-friendly office space,
particularly since the introduction of the climate change levy on firms in April 2001, which is
charged on electricity usage in office space. Environmental concerns have been seen as
relatively unimportant by occupiers to date, but this may change as the running costs of
environmentally inefficient buildings increase.
3.23 The prospects for continued strong growth in the serviced offices sector are likely to
depend on its ability to appeal to a broader range of companies, and attract larger and
more established occupiers to this type of space. There are already signs that this is
happening, with the average length of tenancy in serviced offices rising. However, the
7 PROMIS 2006
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 36
sector still accounts for only a small proportion of the total UK office market, and the
flexibility it gives occupiers will result in continued long-term growth in this sub-sector.
3.24 Other more fundamental changes such as increased working from home and “hot-desking”
are not likely to have a significant impact over the next two to three years.
3.25 There is a clear need to reposition the office market to focus upon Central Milton Keynes
building on the CBX3 scheme and subsequent development. Whilst an out of town market
has become established, there will need to be a greater emphasis upon in town
development and control over out of town space to ensure that this does not adversely
impact on development at CMK.
3.26 Another key issue is the potential to create new and more interesting buildings and a key
challenge particularly in CMK, where uniformity of design could be viewed as a weakness
in a national and indeed globally competitive market.
3.27 This perspective on the market reflects, in part, past trends. The efforts of Invest Milton
Keynes and the Milton Keynes Partnership to develop University provision and to target
inward investment activity around it coupled with wider City marketing form an integral part
of transforming the City and changing past trends.
Industrial
3.28 Milton Keynes has a range of industrial premises distributed around the edge of CMK.
Estimates predict that at the end of 2005, there was between 2.52m m2 and 2.83m m2 of
industrial floorspace within Milton Keynes8. Within the industrial sector, total take-up for
2005 was close to 1m sq ft �92,900 m2), which was the lowest level since 2001. Despite
this relatively low figure for the entire year, over two thirds of this came in the second half
of the year, possibly indicating a rise in the take up of industrial space for 2006.
3.29 Market rental values, according to a number of sources, including Bidwells Drake and
Brown & Lee were at around £6.50 per sq ft for prime rental space in the last quarter of
2005. Good secondary space rental values were around £5.50 per sq ft. It is noticeable
that rental values within Milton Keynes have risen very slowly over the last 15 years, from
around £5 per sq ft in 1991 to their present day levels.
3.30 In terms of demand and availability, there continues to be a shortage of Grade A space
within Milton Keynes, and the prospect of further rises in prime rental values had brought
8 Commercial and Industrial Floorspace and Rateable Value Statistics �2005 Revaluation), 2005 and Bidwells Drake DataBook, 2005
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 37
forward 480,000 sq ft �44,500m2) of speculative development at Quatro Park, RO24, Torc
MK and Celestia. Rental values at these sites �shown in Figure 3.3 below) are in the region
between £7 per sq ft �RO24) and £8 per sq ft �Torc MK)9.
3.31 Total demand for the year 2005 was around 8.8m sq ft, with around 325 requirements for
industrial space. Total availability was around 2.8m sq ft, although just 8% of this space
was Grade A �new), with most space �44%) being 2nd hand good quality. In terms of new
development, there is around 400,000 sq.m of potential floorspace in the pipeline, with one
large new development at Nova Park of 315,000 sqm, with 65,000 sqm currently the
subject of a reserved matters application for a new distribution facility for the John Lewis
Partnership.
3.32 The extent of industrial/distribution development activity in Milton Keynes is shown in
Figure 3.4 below.
Figure 3.4 - Industrial / Distribution Development in Milton Keynes
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
New
Bui
ldin
gs m
2
Source: Invest MK, 2006
3.33 On average 73,500 sqm �790,000 sq ft) of new development has taken place in Milton
Keynes per annum over the past 10 years with peaks in 1999 and 2003. The last 3 years
2004 – 2006 have however seen some of the lowest rates of development since the late
1990’s. This represents new speculative/bespoke development mainly for the
9 www.investmiltonkeynes.com [accessed 11/08/06]
Qua
tro
Park
Qua
tro
Park
Qua
tro
Park
Qua
tro
Park
Qua
tro
Park
Qua
tro
Park
Qua
tro
Park
Qua
tro
Park
Qua
tro
Park
RO
24R
O24
RO
24R
O24
RO
24R
O24
RO
24R
O24
RO
24
Torc
MK
Torc
MK
Torc
MK
Torc
MK
Torc
MK
Torc
MK
Torc
MK
Torc
MK
Torc
MK
Cel
estia
Cel
estia
Cel
estia
Cel
estia
Cel
estia
Cel
estia
Cel
estia
Cel
estia
Cel
estia
MIL
TON
KEY
NES
PAR
TNER
SHIP
- M
ILTO
N K
EYN
ES E
MPL
OYM
ENT
SITE
S Fi
gure
3.3
- Lo
catio
n of
Rec
ent I
ndus
trial
Dev
elop
men
ts
Rep
rodu
ced
from
Ord
nanc
e S
urve
y m
appi
ng w
ith th
e pe
rmis
sion
of H
er M
ajes
ty's
Sta
tione
ry O
ffice
. Cro
wn
Cop
yrig
ht.
Una
utho
rised
repr
oduc
tion
infri
nges
Cro
wn
Cop
yrig
ht a
nd m
ay le
ad to
pro
secu
tion
or c
ivil
proc
eedi
ngs.
Lic
ence
No.
LA
1001
9593
Key
Rec
ent I
ndus
trial
Dev
elop
men
ts
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 39
3.34 distribution sector and some development by owner occupiers. This is a very healthy level
of demand reflecting a relatively plentiful supply of employment land.
Manufacturing Market Future Trends and Key Issues
3.35 National trends are showing a decline in manufacturing production in the UK as
globalisation and the enlargement of the EU sees large mass production manufacturing
activity shifting to overseas locations in South East Asia/China or Eastern Europe.
Competitive pressures are likely to squeeze the cost base of UK manufacturing putting
pressure on the efficient use of manufacturing space. It is likely that UK manufacturing will
continue to shed manufacturing space particularly poorer quality inefficient buildings. The
process of rationalisation is likely to lead to some demand for new manufacturing plants as
companies �particularly nationals/multi-nationals with a number of UK locations) to
rationalise production on to a smaller number of sites or even new locations. Locations will
either gain or lose out through this process with wage costs, land availability/price and the
availability of fiscal incentives being key drivers except where the existing skills base is
considered to be an over-riding requirement �this is more likely for higher value added
sectors).
3.36 Whilst the above reflects headline trends there is likely to remain a requirement for
manufacturing premises in large urban economies providing supplies to UK based
manufacturingparts for overseas production.
Key Trends
• Limited prospects for large scale basic manufacturing investment;
• An overall decline in manufacturing floorspace;
• The process of rationalisation will lead to winners and losers higher cost locations in
the South East. These are likely to lose out unless there are specific skill requirements
which outweigh general cost requirements; and
• A retained but smaller manufacturing base with pressures on occupational costs.
3.37 In Milton Keynes the closure of plants for Aston Martin and Plysu in Newport Pagnell and
Woburn Sands point to these trends.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 40
Logistics/Distribution Market Future Trends and Key Issues
3.38 The logistics and distribution market represents a significant land use issue. In Milton
Keynes there has been considerable growth in this sector in recent years and it is unlikely
that this will change in the short term. Distribution/logistics uses are traditionally viewed as
land hungry and providing relatively low quality employment. Whilst this is not necessarily
always the case, large logistics developments can be expected to employ 40 full time
equivalent employees per hectare �ha) and 5 HGV drivers per ha. Earnings are also often
comparable to manufacturing and above lower grade clerical and administration jobs in the
service sector.
3.39 There are a number of key drivers in the distribution sector:
• Import Substitution – Increasingly goods consumed in the UK are being sourced
from international markets particularly the Far East, rather than being produced
domestically. This creates demand for distribution space to receive goods, add value
through packaging, etc and to forward to the distribution network;
• Purchasing Trends in the Retail Sector – The traditional model has been for each
organisation in the supply chain despatching goods to organise and pay for the
movement of goods to the next stage of the supply chain. However, the emergence
and likely continued dominance of large retail chains �Tesco, B&Q for example) is
altering this structure by taking over the responsibility for managing the inward
transport of goods from supplies distribution centres or factories to their own regional
and national distribution centres. This has a number of advantages including retailers
greater control over inward flow of goods and through buying power, the ability to
lower transport costs. The result in land use terms is pressure for larger
‘consolidation’ centres where goods are packaged before onward delivery to regional
distribution centres;
• Increasing Transport Costs – Whilst road has presented the most cost efficient
means of moving goods in the past EU and UK government directives including the
introduction of lorry road user charging are likely to increase the relative costs of
transport of goods by road;
• Congestion – The logistics industries preference of road haulage is in part driven by
the need for just in time delivery. Increasing congestion in the UK road network �the
road usage is expected to increase by 25%, 2000 – 2010). This will lead to higher
costs as operators factor in additional journey times; and
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 41
• Working Time Directive/Driver Shortages – The impact of legislated shorter working
hours and reported levels of driver shortages �particularly in the South East and
Midlands). Demographic factors such as the high numbers of lorry drivers aged 45 –
65 age range will also impact on this. The consequence is likely to again increase
costs as operators raise wage levels to attract drivers.
Likely Impacts
3.40 The impacts of the above are likely to manifest itself in two ways:
i) The way operators manage their transport arrangement; and
ii) The demand for distribution floorspace over the medium to long term.
3.41 Given increasing road costs certainly in the medium to long term operators will need to
look for more cost effective solutions to remain competitive. The availability of genuine
modal choice to and from distribution centres will be a key component of this and
consequently be increasingly demanded in the market. However, in practical terms road
haulage will remain the favoured means for transporting most goods but operators will
favour locations that offer a choice when goods can be moved cost effectively by rail. The
recent development of a rail freight service by Eddie Stobart Limited from the DRIFT
Terminal at Daventry is an example of this.
3.42 Market trends will also support this as greater levels of import substitution will lead to wide
use of deep sea ports concentrated largely in the South East. Trends in the retail sector
will lead to greater use of consolidation centres. In simple terms the trend will be for higher
volumes, handled by fewer operators at fewer locations. Such concentration will favour rail
freight and hence locations with a modal choice.
3.43 The other main impact will be the demand for distribution space. The clear trend in the
recent past has been for larger buildings. The demand for larger distribution space is likely
to continue, both in terms of the size of floorspace per unit and the number of large units
demanded driven by greater number of consolidation centres, greater import substitution
and the expansion of foodstores into �importing) non-food lines. A key driver of the
logistics and distribution market particularly in the food retail sector will be customer
shopping preferences. For instance a move towards local produce as part of initiatives to
reduce carbon emissions could lead to a demand for smaller local distribution hubs.
Overall there will be greater national demand for warehouse floorspace, as shown by
Cambridge Econometric forecasting model in Chapter 5 of this Study.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 42
Future competitive distribution locations
3.44 The key drivers of future demand for large distribution centres are likely to be:
• Modal choice;
• Rail connectivity;
• Site size;
• Highway links; and
• Labour availability and cost.
3.45 Locations able to offer genuine modal choice are likely to be favoured. Integration of rail
and road avoids local road connecting trips from rail terminal to warehouse, offer rail the
greatest competitive advantage to road transport.
3.46 In terms of size, rail freight connectivity is only likely to be cost effective at a large scale.
Neighbouring uses for operations taking place over 24 hours per day with a focus on night
time deliveries will encourage locations away from residential areas. Distribution activities
remain labour intensive and rely on manual labour for many of their activities.
Consequently, favoured locations will be in or around areas of employment need, with
below average wage rates, the right skills and with fairly short travel to work distances.
Implications for Milton Keynes
3.47 Milton Keynes sites are generally in what has been a favoured location for logistics given
its connections to the motorway network and its proximity to the South East ports. It has
been able to offer land availability on large plots for regional distribution centres in
particular. However, in respect of future trends it has a less favoured position:
• It currently lacks a rail freight facility;
• It has a relatively high wage cost location �when compared to locations in the north
and east accessible from deep sea ports; and
• Skills availability i.e. requirement for manual labour may not be to Milton Keynes
advantage.
3.48 Nevertheless, a growing population, access to the motorway network and relatively good
land availability indicate that Milton Keynes remains a strong and competitive location for
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 43
distribution activity. GVA Grimley expect Milton Keynes to continue to attract companies
from the medium sized regional distribution centre market rather than newer and larger
units for consolidation centres which we believe will favour locations with rail freight, lower
wage costs and very large sites.
Investor Attitudes
3.49 Research has been undertaken on behalf of Invest Milton Keynes, with the intention to
understand the role and perspective of the relocation decision influencers. The intention
was to appreciate how business relocation decisions are made and the balance of hard
and soft factors that impact on the current profile and image of Milton Keynes amongst key
decision-influencers and thus areas for improvement. The companies that took part in the
research were all relocation specialists/ advisors to London businesses. Interviews were
carried out with 20 senior partners or similar from the selected companies. Its value to this
work is as a sample of external perceptions of the city and in particular its city centre.
3.50 Each company that was interviewed had very different responses in how they advise their
client for relocation or expansion. The advice given was dependent on the client, but some
consultants created a location matrix with key criteria such as:
• Road and rail connectivity;
• Size and profile of labour pool;
• Office and staff costs;
• Office availability;
• Major companies in the city; and
• Quality of life measures.
3.51 Most consultants had their own internal research departments, as well as using external
research. Regional Development Agencies �RDAs), relevant investment agencies i.e.
regional websites and local authorities were also approached for research purposes.
3.52 It was found that the essential drivers for change tend to be financial, operational and
human resource requirements. Milton Keynes scored well for operational requirements,
quite well on financial �not as good as other cities) and poor on human resources.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 44
3.53 Most major cities are seen as having significant positives i.e. Reading has a
telecoms/technology cluster, Oxford and Cambridge have world class universities and
Leeds is an ‘up and coming’ city…etc… Milton Keynes registered very low �‘off the radar’)
and was one of the last cities to be mentioned �or until the respondents were prompted).
There was no strong sense of Milton Keynes being a place to relocate, which would not
have been the case 10 years ago. Respondents lacked knowledge of Milton Keynes and
crucially had hardly any knowledge of the future plans for expansion.
3.54 Certain property commentators have noted that Milton Keynes is seen to have lost its
‘excitement’ as a new city, and due to its location is unlikely to become a regional centre,
like Birmingham. Milton Keynes is generally seen as having a grey, dull image and
soulless and does not appear to be a very interesting place to live. As a result Milton
Keynes is regarded as being a ‘back office’ and Business Park location. The image of
Milton Keynes is seen as being negative, despite the commentators not having much
knowledge of the city. It is not seen as a vibrant city, with commentators assuming that
land for development would be readily available. Importantly Milton Keynes is not seen as
having any iconic modern architecture that makes a statement. The built environment was
seen as being bland, uniform, dull and functional.
3.55 Milton Keynes is seen to have no centre of excellence in one particular industry and a lack
of critical mass. Commentators have also remarked that the city lacks a university,
although the Open University campus is located there, the perception is that there is no
university.
3.56 Despite the negative image of Milton Keynes, the functional aspects of the city are seen as
more positive. With its location close to London �approximately 50 miles north of central
London) and excellent road and rail links it is therefore seen as a good location for
warehousing/ distribution with good access to the M1. Competitive office costs �although
maybe not as large a cost saving as other cities), and was a modern organised city in
which traffic flowed easily and had good cycleways with perceived low levels of crime. It
was also believed to have plenty of available land, so if a suitable location was not already
available then one could be built. The research highlighted Milton Keynes as a good
location for data centres �given the greater need for disaster planning for London
businesses post 7/7 terrorist attacks).
3.57 The only ‘emotional’ positive aspect associated with Milton Keynes was the ‘can do’
attitude towards businesses. In the early days of Milton Keynes, the eagerness to attract
businesses created a simplified and rapid planning approach and was seen as being ‘built
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 45
for business’. Major competitor cities have faced problems in accommodating business but
have now begun to overcome them i.e. Manchester and Birmingham.
3.58 The conclusion and recommendation from this research was that Milton Keynes needs to
significantly raise its profile with the property consultants questioned and build good
relationships. This needs to be done through good PR/ advertising in industry publications
i.e. Estates Gazette and Property Week; and the establishment of a prominent local
leadership to attract business, direct communications with consultants through Open Days
/ Corporate hospitality showcasing what Milton Keynes can offer; asking existing large
multinational companies �i.e. CEO’s) to provide positive testimonials regarding their
experience of the city, to provide a positive image. Finally, achieving a targeted approach
to attracting investors is important. This can be done on focusing on a particular industry
such as IT, and professional services. Overseas investors should be targeted through the
appeal of Milton Keynes being a new, clean and efficient city.
3.59 This work has informed the work undertaken by Invest Milton Keynes to reposition the City.
Extensive marketing has taken place to promote links with the University and to target key
sectors such as creative businesses and ICT. Initiatives such as promotional events,
conferences such as MIPIM provide the opportunity to address pre conceptions about the
City and provide new opportunities. Furthermore Milton Keynes’ location at the centre of
the Oxford to Cambridge Arc makes it also especially attractive to technology and
knowledge-based businesses and those involved in research and development. There are
opportunities for tailor-made development of incubation centres and grown on space for R
& D companies through to manufacturing facilities. This forms a key element of Invest
Milton Keynes Business Plan.
Existing Businesses within Milton Keynes
3.60 Data is available on businesses within Milton Keynes from the 2005 Employment Survey.
This is a comprehensive survey of over 7,000 businesses in Milton Keynes. Whilst not a
survey designed to assess property demand it does provide information on the extent of
employment growth and its location, the size of businesses and the extent of local control
over business decisions, which are all influential on property. Table 3.1 below highlights
the change in employment 2003 – 2005
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 46
Table 3.1 - Employment Change In Milton Keynes 2003 – 2005
Jobs Sector July 2003 October 2005 Change No % No % No % Agriculture 573 0.5% 543 0.4% -30 -5.2% Production 17 200 14.5% 15 383 12.6% -1 817 -10.6% Construction 4 185 3.5% 4 495 3.7% 310 7.4% Services 96 744 81.5% 101 846 83.3% 5 102 5.3% Total 118 702 100.0% 122 267 100.0% 3 565 3.0%
Source: Milton Keynes Employment Survey 2005
3.61 As would be expected, employment in production sectors has declined by over 10% over
the period with large losses in employment within mechanical engineering, food and drink
and motor vehicles, but with growth in other metal goods. Service sector employment grew
by 5,100 in a little over 2 years with significant gains in wholesale distribution, business
services, education and medical and health services.
Implications for Property Demand
• Reduced overall requirements for manufacturing space, but growth in some sectors
with demand either for new space or to re-use the space vacated by others:
• Growth in service sectors, some such as wholesale distribution will require B8
�warehouse) possibly ancillary office space, Others such as business services/real
estate occupying B1a �office space); and
• Significant growth in sectors such as education �+1,400 jobs) and medical and health
services �1,860 jobs) with limited demand for traditional employment space, other than
some demand for office �B1a) functions. It is significant that these two sectors were
the largest growth sectors in employment terms in 2003 – 2005.
Nature of Jobs Growth
3.62 Of the net job growth of 3,565 jobs 2003 – 2005 the largest source of employment growth
was existing businesses taking on more staff �15,428 new jobs) and new businesses
�11,843 jobs). At the same time existing businesses lost 9,180 jobs and 1,325 businesses
closed resulting in the loss of 14,525 jobs. Chapter 8 provides recommendations on how
to retain existing businesses through property provision.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 47
Implications for Property Demand
• The above reflects the continual churn of employment in an economy. The impact on
property demand is likely to be complex, with new and expanding businesses often
taking space occupied by declining or closed businesses. Employment growth could
also be absorbed in the more efficient use of existing premises. Decline in
employment may not immediately result in a fall in demand for property as businesses
retain existing space because of lease commitments or a desire to retain space
expecting future upturns. However, over time property demand can be expected to fall
as employment declines in a particular sector;
• The extent to which vacated property would be occupied by expanding businesses will
depend on its suitability for the expanding business concerned. This will at least partly
be reflected in the sector those businesses are in i.e. space vacated by manufacturing
businesses will often not be suitable for service industries with different locational and
building needs; and
• Further analysis of the nature of job growth by type of establishment would assist in
developing some understanding of this.
Size of Establishments
Table 3.2 Change in Employment 2003 - 2005 by Establishment
Employment Band
Employed Employed
Change
July 2003 October 2005 No % No % No % 0-1 1 549 1% 1 753 1% 204 13% 2-5 7 668 7% 7 899 7% 231 3% 6-10 8 459 7% 8 191 7% -268 -3% 11-20 10 153 9% 10 715 9% 562 6% 21-50 19 645 17% 20 646 17% 1 001 5% 51-100 13 394 11% 13 401 11% 7 0% 101-200 16 042 14% 15 097 12% -945 -6% 201-499 16 965 14% 18 623 15% 1 658 10% 500+ 23 495 20% 24 610 20% 1 115 5% Total 117 370 100% 120 935 100% 3 565 3% Overall Total# 118 702 122 267 # - After counting back in estimate for out stationed construction jobs
Source: Milton Keynes Employment Survey 2005
3.63 Sole traders employing no more than one person grew by 13% �204 people) 2003 – 2005.
Companies employing less than five people, employ 8% of the working population but
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 48
represent 60% of establishments. Large establishments, 200+ employees increased
employment by 2,750 jobs.
Implications for Property
• Although the survey does not contain information on the sectoral nature of
establishments, the fact that large businesses have grown may reflect growth by large
public sector organisations �with limited direct property implications). Examples of this
would be the Local Authority, the NHS and English Partnerships.
Location of Employment
3.64 The spatial nature of job creation provides a more direct link to property although it may
often reflect the location of development activity rather than demand itself. The table above
reveals extensive job growth across the city. Table 3.3 identifies employment change by
location 2003 – 2005.
Table 3.3 Change in Employment Location
Postcode Location July 2003 October 2005 Change No % No % No % MK1 North Bletchley 8 738 7% 9 329 8% 591 7% MK2 Central/South Bletchley 4 805 4% 4 880 4% 75 2% MK3 West Bletchley 3 295 3% 3 242 3% -53 -2% MK4 Westcroft/Tattenhoe 2 669 2% 2 690 2% 21 1% MK5 Shenley Wood/
Shenley Church End/ Knowlhill
4 320 4% 4 055 3% -265 -6%
MK6 Bleak Hall/ Winterhill/ Redmoor /Eaglestone
9 182 8% 10 824 9% 1 642 18%
MK7 Caldecotte/Tillbrook 7 543 6% 8 275 7% 732 10% MK8 Crownhill/Wymbush 3 839 3% 3 988 3% 149 4% MK9 Central Milton Keynes 25 202 21% 23 642 19% -1 560 -6% MK10 Kingston/Brinklow 5 837 5% 6 768 6% 931 16% MK11 Stony Stratford/
Kiln Farm 4 992 4% 5 017 4% 25 1%
MK12 Old Wolverton/ Wolverton Mill/ Wolverton/ Stacy Bushes
5 977 5% 6 326 5% 349 6%
MK13 Bradville/Bradwell Abbey/Rooksley
3 484 3% 3 927 3% 443 13%
MK14 Blakelands/ Linford Wood
7 036 6% 7 460 6% 424 6%
MK15 Willen Lake/Northfield Fox Milne/Tongwell
6 353 5% 6 975 6% 622 10%
MK16 Newport Pagnell 6 253 5% 6 009 5% -244 -4% MK17 Woburn Sands/ Newton
Longville 3 691 3% 3 159 3% -532 -14%
MK19 Haversham/ 1 762 1% 2 044 2% 282 16%
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 49
Postcode Location July 2003 October 2005 Change Hanslope
MK46 Olney 2 353 2% 2 286 2% -67 -3% Unclassified 39 * 39 * -- 0% Out stationed construction jobs 1 332 1% 1 332 1% -- 0% Total 118 702 100% 122 267 100% 3 565 3% # - Examples only – not exhaustive * - Less than 1%
Source: Milton Keynes Employment Survey 2005
3.65 However, the following locations have experienced employment decline:
• MK5 �including Shenley Wood, Shenley Church End, Knowhill);
• MK9 Central Milton Keynes;
• MK3 West Bletchley;
• MK16 Newport Pagnell; and
• MK17 Woburn Sands/Newton Longville.
3.66 The situation in Central Milton Keynes reflects restructuring amongst a small number of
occupiers in the retail sector but also a reduction in the total number of establishments –
38 between 2003 – 2005. The decline at Woburn Sands probably reflects the closure of
the Plysu plant. Employment growth has been particularly high in absolute terms in the
following locations:
• MK1 – North Bletchley + 590 jobs
• MK6 – Bleak Hall/Winterhill + 1,640 jobs
• MK7 – Caldecotte/Tillbrook + 730 jobs
• MK10 – Kingston/Brinklow + 930 jobs
• MK15 – Willenlake/Northfield Fox Milne + 620 jobs
3.67 Some of this job growth reflects new development activity for instance developments at
Snellshall West, which is in progress for a large manufacturing/ logistics building. Also
developments at Kingston near junction 14 of the M1. Other more recent developments are
the IKEA store and the Asda Wal-Mart in Denbigh.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 50
Implications for Property
• As discussed above, changes in the spatial distribution of employment may well reflect
development activity rather than demand. However with CMK the decline in
employment if it were to reflect a longer term trend may reflect a number of facts.
i) A lack of investment in new development �there has been little new space built in
CMK over the above period);
ii) More limited interest in CMK from occupiers due to a range of factors; and
iii) Sectoral factors with an over representation in CMK of sectors in decline such as
retail distribution �750 job losses 2003 – 2005), postal/telecoms services �-770
jobs).
• Whilst only a short term trend coupled with property demand dynamics discussed in
the property section, the loss of employment in CMK may indicate that much needs to
be done to develop CMK as a key driver of the Milton Keynes economy and property
market.
Ownership of Businesses
3.68 The ownership of businesses can often reflect the extent to which property decisions are
made locally or reflect regional, national or international decisions.
Table 3.4 Owner of Businesses
Establishments Jobs Origin Number % Number %
Started-up in the Milton Keynes area 3 664 71.5 46 287 50.1 Relocated from elsewhere in the UK 440 8.6 12 026 13.2 Relocated from outside the UK 13 2.5 285 3.1 Opening a new branch in Milton Keynes 1 009 19.7 32 662 35.8 Total 5 126 100.0 91 260 100.0
Source: Milton Keynes Employment Survey 2005
Table 3.5 Location of Headquarters
Location: Establishments % Milton Keynes �include sole trader) 3 958 78.3 Within the UK 1 034 20.4 Outside the UK 66 1.3 Total 5 058 100.0
Source: Milton Keynes Employment Survey 2005
3.69 Most businesses started up in Milton Keynes reflecting many small employers �although
over half of jobs), relatively few relocated from elsewhere in the UK �440 establishments
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 51
12,000 jobs). Companies opening a new branch in Milton Keynes represented 32,600 jobs
�this reflects additional inward investment not reflected elsewhere in a range of sectors
including retail).
3.70 In terms of ownership most Milton Keynes establishments are locally controlled 78%,
20.4% have headquarters located elsewhere in the UK and only 1.3% outside the UK.
However, this data is not presented in terms of employment which we suspect would show
a greater influence for UK and outside UK owned companies upon total employment.
Conclusions
3.71 The issues to emerge from this analysis are:
• Development activity for offices has been focused outside CMK and there is plentiful
remaining supply outside the city centre;
• Rental levels although improving are below levels where speculative development of
city centre offices �above 3 storeys) would be viable as a single use. Those schemes
that have been brought forward such as CBX3 provide a mix of offices and higher
value uses such as residential and retail;
• There has been little development activity in CMK, which partly explains falling
employment;
• Industrial /distribution rents are relatively healthy and development activity has taken
place at reasonable levels with a focus of distribution;
• Investor advisors do not regard CMK favourably referring to it as functional rather
vibrant. This may deter some occupiers and place MK more in competition in terms of
occupation costs with the likes of Luton, rather than Birmingham, Manchester and
Leeds e.g. Regional Centres;
• Employment growth in recent years has been strong in non-employment space
sectors �health and education); and
• Whilst there are many small companies employment and therefore property demand is
still driven by medium to large companies. However in this context 10 or more
employees could be considered a medium-sized company.
Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP
May 07 52