Military-Strategic Information Section Strategic Division // Israel Defense Forces Unclassified ||...

Military-Strategic Information Section

Strategic Division // Israel Defense Forces

Unclassified || Slide 1

RECENT EVENTS IN LEBANON

IN L IGHT OF THE UN TRIBUNAL INDICTMENT




TABLE OF CONTENTS

Recent Events

Lebanon Background Lebanon Politics

Special Tribunal for Lebanon

Hizballah’s Threats

1/12: Ministers Resign and Collapse of Hariri’s Government

Government Formation Process

Map and Statistics

History of Main Events 1920-2010

Internal Affairs: From the “2005 New Order” to the Present

Social and Demographic Characteristics

Governmental Regime

Political Trends

Political Camps

External Actors

After Hariri’s Murder

The Judicial Process

Reactions to STL

Overview of Hizbullah

Hizbullah’s Military Aspects

A Threat to Lebanon

A Threat to Israel

A Threat to the Region

SUMMARY

BACKGROUND INFORMATION




SUMMARY• The fall of PM Saad Hariri’s government, and the growing tensions over the preliminary

indictments of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, have provoked fears of regional

destabilization and renewed sectarian violence in Lebanon.

• Hizbullah, strongly backed by a Syria and Iran striving to deepen their

influence in Lebanon, acts aggressively against state institutions and political

opponents to advance its interests, thus challenging Lebanon’s sovereignty and

independence.

• The present crisis highlights the increasing “Hizbullazation” of Lebanon. Hizbullah

continues to advance its goals, gain legitimacy and strengthen its political basis. For

the first time since “The Cedar Revolution” (2005), Syria and Hizbullah have

managed to attain political dominance.

• Hizbullah’s militaristic abilities and forces now largely surpass its 2006, pre-

Second Lebanon War levels. The international acceptance of this trend has rendered

Hizbullah confident of its power and its right to use it, despite its status as an illegal non-

state terrorist entity.

• A radical government led by Hizbullah will have a major effect on national

issues (government policy, “Defense Strategy”, internal security, UNIFIL’s mission,

STL), constituting strategic challenges, not only for Lebanon and Israel, but for the

entire region.

Focal P

oin

ts




RECENT EVENTS

Ministers Resign and Collapse of Hariri’s Government

On 12 January 2011, 11 Lebanese ministers withdrew from the National Unity

Government headed by Saad Hariri. The government immediately dissolved

due to the lack of support from the Lebanese Parliament.

Of those 11 ministers (including the Foreign Affairs,

Energy, Communications, Industry and Tourism

ministers), 10 are members of the “March 8”

political camp lead by Hizbullah. The other minister

is a presidential appointee who publicly identifies

with Hizbullah. This new crisis in the Lebanese political arena follows the failure between

Saad Hariri’s and Hizbullah’s coalitions to come to a comprise regarding

the outcome of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL, charged with investigating

the assassination of Rafik Hariri), despite mediation attempts by Syria and Saudi

Arabia to reach a deal concerning the reaction to the tribunal indictments.




RECENT EVENTS


After the Hariri government has collapsed, the current administration is

considered temporary. The President (Michelle Suleiman) is required to

build a new government within 30 days by electing a (Sunni) Prime Minister

with the approval of Parliament.

In the past weeks, both the “March 8” and “March 14”

alliances have tried to convince external parties to support

them in their attempts to achieve a majority in the

Parliament (they need at least 65 of the 128 members).

Druze leader Walid Jumblatt’s support for the “March 8”

alliance could be decisive in promoting the formation of a

new government more closely related to Hizbullah.




RECENT EVENTS


Due to these developments, Lebanon is currently trapped in a delicate

situation, giving rise to mutual accusations between the parties and

fears of renewed sectarian violence.

The events of the past few days, and the announcement

that Hizbollah has obtained a majority in the Parliament

to elect the Sunni millionaire Najib Miqati as the next

prime minister (as a consequence of Syrian moves),

demonstrate the plausibility of a government

established by Hizbollah.The “March 14” Alliance has expressed its refusal to participate in a Syrian-

Iranian “puppet” government. Employing martial rhetoric, proponents of

the Alliance called for a “Day of Anger” in protest. Christian leader Samir G’ag’a

declared that a pro-Hizbullah government could lead to a civil war and

“transform Lebanon into Gaza”.




After Rafik Hariri’s Murder

Rafik Hariri, along with 22 other people, was killed on February 2005 by a truck

bomb. The murder initially led to the appointment of the UN International

Independent Investigation Commission (UNIIIC), headed by Detlev Mehlis. The

Mehlis Report, presented on October 2005, implicated Lebanese, Syrian and

Iran intelligence officers.

SPECIAL TRIBUNAL FOR LEBANON

The present crisis climaxes over tensions

regarding the STL, which is expected to indict

members of Hizbullah and to determine

potential Syrian and Iranian culpability in

the Hariri’s political assassination.

Following the 1757 UN Security Council Resolution on May 2007, the

STL was finally created on March 2009 to procure a formal and binding

international sentence in the case. The mission headquarters are located

near the Hague and 49% of the project is financed by the Lebanese government.




The Judicial ProcessThe draft indictments of the STL investigation were presented on Monday, 17

January 2011 but the details of the suspects and their charges remain

confidential.

However, various sources report that the STL will charge high-ranking Hizbullah,

Syrian and Iranian authorities with the crime of political assassination. This

judicial process represents a huge danger to Hizbullah’s – and its

supporters’ – status and legitimacy in Lebanon.


Following the decision of the prosecutor, Daniel

Bellemare, to publish the indictments, Judge Daniel

Fransen has 6-10 weeks to decide whether to confirm or

dismiss them. The names of the suspects will be

publicized if he decides that there is enough evidence to

proceed with a trial.




Reactions to STLThe potential impact of the STL depends much more on how the different

relevant actors react to the report than the conclusion of the report itself.

Many Hizbullah officials have expressed their potential willingness to tolerate

a damning STL judgment should Hariri’s camp agree to make no concerted effort to

fulfill its sentence.

However, if the “March 14” camp is determined to fulfill the indictments or

possibly even declare support for the findings, Hizbullah might decide to re-ignite

hostilities and provoke bloodshed.

Hassan Nasrallah tried to quell the tensions, but also stated that Hizbollah

would not tolerate an arrest of any of its members. He also declared that

Hizbollah would deny support to the STL should it gain control of the

government.





BACKGROUND INFORMATION




LEBANON BACKGROUND

Area: 10.452 km2

Width: 88 km (maximum)

32 km (minimum)

Population: 4.224.000

Population Density: 404/km2

Terrain: Plateau along the coast; mountainous in the center, east and north; valley in the far east.

GDP (estimate to 2010): $58.576 billion

GDP per capita: $14.988

Map and Statistics




LEBANON BACKGROUND

History of Main Events : 1920- 2010

1943

1975

1920

1978

1985

1989

1996

2000

2005

1993

1976

Founding of the “Great Lebanon”

entity

Lebanon achieves

Independence – “National

Pact”

Start of the

Lebanese Civil War

Syria enters Lebanon

End of the Lebanese Civil War,

“Taif Agreement

”

“Grapes of Wrath” Israeli

Operation against

Hizbullah

Hariri’s Murder,“Cedar

Revolution”, Syrian

withdrawal after UN

Resolution 1559

Israeli withdrawal from South

Lebanon

2009

National Unity Government

2006

Second Lebanon War

– UNIFIL

Mandate by UNSCR 1701 Resolution

1982

“Peace in the

Galilee” War,

creation of

Hizbullah

“Litani Operation”, Creation of UNIFIL by

425 Resolution

Israeli withdrawal to the “Security Border”

“Justice and Accountabili

ty”: First Israeli

operation against

Hizbullah




LEBANON BACKGROUND

Lebanon Affairs: From the “2005 New Order” to the present

September 2004: Lebanon Constitutional Amendment – Backed

by Syria, its approval extended the office term of President Emile

Lahoud.

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

14 February 2005 – Rafik Hariri’s Murder – Former Prime Minister

Hariri killed by a car bomb in Beirut. Leaders of the March 14 Alliance

accused Syria and Hizbullah. In response, the March 8 Alliance, which

attributed responsibility for the murder to the USA and Israel, was

formed.




LEBANON BACKGROUND


2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

26 April 2005 - Syrian Retirement after

UN 1559 Resolution – After the United

Nations called for an investigation, Syria

withdrew it troops from Lebanon. The

Lebanese political arena consolidated into

two political camps: the March 14 Alliance

and March 8 Alliance.

14 March 2005 – “Cedar Revolution” –

The murder of Hariri led to a series of

demonstrations, popularly named the “Cedar

Revolution”. Participants demanded the

withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon as

well as the establishment of an international

commission to investigate the murder.




LEBANON BACKGROUND

July 2006 – Second Lebanon War - In response

to Hizbullah rocket fire and the wounding, killing

and kidnapping of Israeli soldiers, the IDF entered

Hizbullah-controlled southern Lebanon. The war

resulted in UN Resolution 1701, which prompted a

ceasefire and established a renewed version of

UNIFIL to act as a deterrent to Hizbullah aggression.

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

May 2007 – Nahr al Bared conflict – Battles

between the Lebanon Internal Security Forces

(ISF) and militants of Fatah Al Islam (an Al-

Qaeda inspired group).





LEBANON BACKGROUND2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

May 2008 – Internal Strife – After Siniora’s

government attempted to prohibit a Hizbullah

communications network, the group responded with

violence. The struggle concluded with the “Doha

Agreement”, which ushered in Michel Suleiman as

president and sealed a commitment between the

coalitions to avoid a new civil war. June 2009 – Close victory of the “March 14 Alliance” in elections –

A national unity government was formed, directed by Saad Hariri and

including a Hizbullah veto (“National Silence Government”).





LEBANON BACKGROUND

Social and Demographic Characteristics

Lebanon’s population is a mixture of 18 ethnic-religious minorities, including

Muslim Shi’ites, Muslim Sunnis, Christian Maronites, Christian Greek Orthodox,

Druze and Greek Catholics. This country’s diversity is a consequence of its

history as a refuge for the region’s persecuted minorities.Druze

Shiites

Christians

Sunnis

The last official census was held in 1932,

when there was an established Christian

majority.

A recent non-official study by the

“Statistics Lebanon” firm shows that

Shiites constitute 28% of the total

population, Sunnis 28%, Maronites 21.5%,

Greek Orthodox 8%, Druze 5% and Greek

Catholics 4%.




LEBANON POLITICS

Governmental Regime

President – Christian Maronite (Michel Suleiman)

Prime Minister – Muslim Sunni (Saad Hariri)

Parliament Chairman – Muslim Shiite (Nabih Berri)

Role Distribution in Government (before its fall):

Lebanon is technically governed as a parliamentary democracy. Due to its

complex demographic composition, Lebanon has a special governing system

known as “Confessionalism”, intended to ensure fair representation among its

diverse population.

This system functions in both the government and the parliament and was

implemented by the “1943 National Pact” and the “1989 Taif Agreement”.



The 128 seats of the unicameral Parliament are equally divided between

Christians and Muslims, and proportionally between the minorities as well as

between the regions.


LEBANON POLITICS

Governmental Regime

Distribution in Parliament:

After Taif Before Taif Confession

27 20 Sunni

27 19 Shi’a

8 6 Druze

2 0 Alawite

64 45 Total Muslims

64 54 Total Christians + Muslims

After Taif Before Taif Confession

34 30 Maronite

14 11 Greek Ortodox

8 6 Greek Catholic

5 4 Armenian Ortodox

1 1 Armenian Catholic

1 1 Protestant

1 1 Other Christians

64 54 Total Christians




LEBANON POLITICS

Political Trends

Ethnic-Religious rivalry -

The main component of Lebanese politics affecting civil life, institutions

roles distribution, laws and policies. Parties tend to be armed or

connected to armed factions, so political issues tend to result in violent

confrontations.

External involvement –

Since the Civil War, Lebanon has been a battleground for regional actors to

settle their disputes. Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt, Arab Emirates, the

USA and France are all historical stakeholders that have actively

influenced Lebanese politics by supporting parties and indirectly

dominating internal Lebanese affairs.




LEBANON POLITICS

Political Trends

Hizbullah’s character as “a state within a state” –

Hizbullah’s civilian-military system, provided by Iran and Syria, enables it

to implement independent policies. Moreover, it gained the political “veto

power” by integrating into the former government.

The Palestinian issue –

A sensitive issue since the Civil War, the Palestinians maintain a

substantial presence in Lebanon as refugees. Most of them have a limited

legal status: they do not receive Lebanese citizenship or internal aid, and

are often manipulated to achieve terrorist goals, both local and

global.




LEBANON POLITICS

Political Camps

Religion and ethnic identification: Sunnis vs. Shiites vs.

Christians

Character of Lebanon: Secular vs. Islamist

Path of Politics: Moderation vs. “Resistance”

Regional affinity: Pro-Occidental / Pro-Saudi vs. Pro-

Syrian/Iran

Economic Methods

The elements that divide the camps

include:

The characteristics of the Lebanese political regime, “Confessionalism”, requires the

conforming of inter-ethnic political camps. This means combining different ethnic groups

and forming political alliances.




LEBANON POLITICS

Political Camps

Headed by Saad Hariri’s principle Sunni party (Movement of the Future) with Maronite and Druze allies, it was consolidated after the mass demonstrations of the “Cedar Revolution”.

Obtained parliamentary majority (71 of the 128 seats) in the June 2009 elections and formed a government after four months of negotiations.

Hariri is seconded by the Christian leaders Amin J’amil (Falanges chairman) and Samir G’ag’a (Kajal chairman).

“March 14” Camp

Since 2005, the Lebanon political arena has been divided into two main political

camps:




LEBANON POLITICS

Political Camps

The main opposition coalition, it obtained 57 seats in the June 2009 elections and negotiated a national unity government with “veto power”.

It is conformed by the main Shiite parties Hizbullah (headed by Hassan Nasrallah) and Amal (headed by Nabih Berry), in cooperation with the Christian leader Michael Aoun and a number of Sunni, Christian and Druze leaders.

“March 8” Camp

The President: Michel Suleiman

The Druze leader: Walid Jumblatt

Non-aligned actors




LEBANON POLITICS

Political Camps

PARLIAMENT ELECTION RESULTS 2009




LEBANON POLITICS

Political Camps

March 14 Al-liance, 60Ma

rch 8

Al-liance, 57

Progressive Socialist Party *, 11

SEATSPARTIES IN THE

COALITION

29Movement of the

Future (Mustaqbal)

15March 14

Independents

5 Lebanese Forces

5 Kataeb Party

2 Hunchak Party

1 Islamic Group

1 Ramgavar Party

1Democratic Left

Movement

1 National Liberal Party

SEATSPARTIES IN THE

COALITION

19Free Patriotic

Movement

13 Hizbullah

13 Amal Movement

4 Marada Movement

2Lebanese

Democratic Party

2

Armenian Revolutionary

Federation

2Syrian Social

Nationalist Party

2 Ba'ath Party

PARLIAMENT COALITIONS AFTER ELECTION RESULTS 2009

(*Note: The Progressive Socialist Party (Druzes) was firstly part of the 14 March Coalition, one month after the elections withdraw, but remain part of the Parliament majority)




LEBANON POLITICS

External Actors

The division between the Lebanese camps follows a familiar pattern in the

Middle East; they are divided into the “moderate camp” and the “radical camp”.

The chief external actors in Lebanese politics reflect this schism:

Syria – sees Lebanon as part of its area of influence,

primarily supports Shiites though also Sunni groups.

Recently returned to influential prominence in

Lebanon after international pressure forced its oust in

2005; is thus interested in maintaining stability.

Saudi Arabia – acts in support of the Sunnis to reinforce it position, especially

following Syria’s recent withdrawal. While it strongly supports Hariri, it also

wants stability.




LEBANON POLITICS

External Actors

Iran – has a growing influence in the military arena

by providing financial support, intelligence, and

arms to Hizbullah, thus advancing Shiite interests

and fortifying the threat to Israel’s northern front.

Egypt, Arab Emirates – interested in protecting Sunni factions.

The Occident (mainly USA and France) – consider Lebanon a geo-strategic

asset in the region, and is interested in protecting the Christians minority

(Lebanon used to be a French colony). In addition, it works to support pro-

Occident Sunni parties.




HIZBULLAH THREATS

Overview of Hizbullah

Following the rise of the Shiites in Lebanon in the 1960s-70s and the Islamic

Revolution in Iran in 1979, Hizbullah was established as a result of the 1982

Lebanon War, during which it was enforced by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards.

Hizbullah’s main goal is to instigate an Islamic revolution in Lebanon by

imposing a government based on Shiite laws and to export this revolution to

different regions in the Middle East.

Hizbullah is a radical Shiite organization which

represents a major political and military force in the

region. The organization functions as a front-

line Iranian proxy, relying on both Iranian and

Syrian support.

With the death of Abbas Mussawi, in 1992, Hassan

Nasrallah was nominated as the new Secretary-

General. This marked a new era in Hizbullah

operations, combined with expanding political activity

as a party in the Lebanese Parliament.



Classified || Slide 30

HIZBULLAH THREATS

After the IDF withdrawal from Lebanon in 2000, Hizbullah succeeded in

strengthening its status in the Lebanese “street”, progressively legitimizing itself

as a national resistance movement. This process was enforced by its entrance to

the government in July 2005. Once in a position of power, the organization slowly

consolidated its hold on the political situation, procuring a “veto” in 2008.

Hezbollah’s power stems from a number of sources:

Military PoliticalSocio-

Economic

Professional and well-trained army

Guerilla warfare techniques and civilian shields

Strategic force (UAV’s, missiles,

etc)

Terror component

Modus Vivendi with the government

Increased influence following

governmental recognition

“Blocking third” veto right

Operates primarily in Shiite regions

Ideological indoctrination

Largely backed by Iran




HIZBULLAH THREATS

Hezbullah’s modus operandi includes the use of

advanced conventional weapons with guerilla terrorist

techniques.

To this effect, it has amassed a massive arsenal

combined with advanced weapons, over 40,000

rockets, anti-tank and coastal missiles, IEDs, UAVs

and more.

This is backed by Scud and M600 rockets, which allow

Hezbollah to target the Israeli population from deep

within Lebanon strategic depth.

122mm Grad (25km / 15 mil)

240mm Fajr 3 (50km / 30 mil)

Fajr 5 (75km / 45 mil)

M-600 (300km / 185 mil)

Scud-D (600km / 375 mil)

THE IRANIAN-MADE ABABIL UAV

THE ZILZAL

220M ROCKET LAUNCHER

C802 COASTAL MISSILE

SAGGER ATGM MISSILES

Hizbullah’s Military Aspects




HIZBULLAH THREATS

Following the Second Lebanon War in 2006 and despite UNSCR 1701, Hizbullah

began the process of repairing and increasing its capabilities. This occurred through

a number of venues:Training

Drills

Smuggling

Infrastructure

Personnel

Arsenal

Functioning as a front-line proxy of Iran in the region, Hizbullah continues to rely

on massive weapon transfers as a lifeline for its operations. The smuggling takes

place by air, land and sea, benefiting from pivotal Syrian support as well.

IRANIAN WEAPONS FOUND IN LEBANON




HIZBULLAH THREATS

Despite the explicit prohibition of non-governmental weapons in southern

Lebanon (UNSCR 1701), many weapons are sent on to the region.

Iranian meddling in the region well exceeds weapon transfers. Iran continue to

play an active role in training members of Hezbullah, as well as providing

assistance for its political activity, which has already seen dividends.

"Iran shall not supply, sell or transfer…any arms or related material…all States shall prohibit the procurement of such items from Iran by their nationals, or using their flag vessels or aircraft“

(UNSCR 1747, Paragraph 5)

Iranian efforts are complemented by

massive economic support to Hezbullah.

The Iranian Quds organization alone

contributes between 100-200 million

dollars annually to Hezbullah.



34

Hizbullah’s military assets are deployed within populated areas throughout Lebanon, as part of its strategy, doctrine and preparation for war.

5,000 Activists

≈40,000 Rockets

Hizbullah’s Deployment

in Southern Lebanon

Command

Unit

Sector

Village

Each village military

compound contains dozens of activists and

hundreds of rockets

Concept of Operation

Massive long-range strike

Targeting mostly Israeli population centers

Territorial defense of the launching units

HIZBULLAH THREATS



35

(Closed Military Zones)

2006 2010

CMZ Inhabited Environment

Khirbat Salim

14/17/09

Depot in town center containing 122mm rockets, 155mm rockets, mortars and more detonates

Tayr Falsi

12/10/09

Arms depot detonates. Weapons are removed and transferred to nearby village

Marwaheen

23/8/09

Local civilians forcibly eject Hizbullah operatives attempting to establish operations in town

Since Lebanon War, Hezbollah routinely deploys in the rural environment of southern Lebanon. This serves as its backbone for war-

time operations.

HIZBULLAH THREATS




HIZBULLAH THREATS

Hizbullah possesses the most powerful military force in Lebanon,

thanks to Syrian and Iranian assistance. Its arsenal far outnumbers that of

the Lebanon National Army, and in some parts of the country constitutes the

de-facto martial authority.

Hizbullah continues to advance it goals, gain legitimacy and

strengthen its basis in Lebanon (and may even attain political

domination). It uses a dual strategy of accumulating power without seizing

control of the government while progressively weakening political rivals and

destabilizing the political system.

Hizbullah’s dual process of legitimization and destabilization in the

Lebanese political arena is expected to continue for the foreseeable future

(due to its demographic advantages), and could perpetuate ethnic tensions.

A Threat to Lebanon




HIZBULLAH THREATS

Since its creation, Hizbullah has posed a military threat to Israel’s

northern border, challenging Israel’s security interests in Lebanon and the

region.

During the past 30 years, Hizbullah has employed various means in its

attempt to terrorize the Israeli population, including attacks on Israeli

military bases, missiles fired at Israeli civilians, kidnapping soldiers, etc.

Hizbullah military potential is reserved as a future platform for Iran and Syria to

attack Israel. Iran established it and aided it with resources, logistics and

arms. For Syria, Hizbullah is useful in the fight against Israel and as a means

to advance its interests in the Lebanese internal political order.

A Threat to Israel




HIZBULLAH THREATS

Hizbullah envisions itself as an active regional player with the purpose

of creating an Islamic Shiite revolution in the Middle East.

Moreover, as an instrument of Iran Hizbullah believes that

moderate/pro-occident countries stand in opposition to their

plans in Lebanon. Hizbullah sees Lebanon as a potential military

platform from which to threaten said countries and thus accumulate

power for the radical camp.

A strong Hizbullah, in control of Lebanese politics and territory,

constitutes a destabilizing force in the region that threatens the

development of moderate trends in the Middle East.

A Threat to the Middle East

Military-Strategic Information Section Strategic Division // Israel Defense Forces Unclassified ||...

Documents

Transcript of Military-Strategic Information Section Strategic Division // Israel Defense Forces Unclassified ||...