Midwest Mechanical Services & Solutions · Midwest Mechanical Services & Solutions ... AMMONIA &...

39
Midwest Mechanical Services & Solutions Midwest Mechanical Services & Solutions

Transcript of Midwest Mechanical Services & Solutions · Midwest Mechanical Services & Solutions ... AMMONIA &...

Midwest MechanicalServices & Solutions

Midwest MechanicalServices & Solutions

Owner
2324 Centerline Industrial Drive - St. Louis, MO 63146 - 314-707-7655 - www.midweststl.com

Refrigeration

Understanding Relationships

Page 3

Refrigeration Efficiency =

Precise Load Matching +Lower Compression Ratios

Page 4

Basic Approach Strategies:•Capacity Requirements based on intended use in lieu of “Rule of Thumb” sizing.•Compressor Selection Based on Year-Round Load Characteristics.•Condenser Capacity Optimization•Low Pressure Drop Piping Design•Third Power Fan and Pump Laws•Floating but Stable Discharge Pressures•Floating Suction Pressures•Premium High Efficiency Motors•Integrated and Flexible PLC Control Systems.

Page 5

How We Can Save You Money:•Improved Production•Increased “Up Time”•Reduction in Energy Costs•Demand Cost Avoidance•Lower Maintenance Costs•FREE Mechanical Risk Index (MRI)•Records of Performance•Increased Profits and Customer Satisfaction•Improved Utilization of Resources

Owner
CONTACTS: MIKE CASSANO - INDUSTRIAL REFRIGERATION MANAGER E-Mail: [email protected] MATT RICHARDSON - VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS E-Mail: [email protected]
Owner
MIDWEST MECHANICAL WANTS TO EARN YOUR REFRIGERATION BUSINESS: - SERVICE - PARTS - UPGRADES - NEW PROJECTS
Owner
AMMONIA & FREON REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS

Page 6

Refrigeration industry characteristics

Page 7

Large energy users, high load factor

Facilities expanded over time, always evolving

Risk averse, slow to change

high cost of investments and mistakes

experience takes time

heavy reliance on plant operators, transferred knowledge

No national/state ratings or standards for refrigeration equipment

Systems not “packaged”

systems are built of components

every application and each system is different

Minimal A&E influence

Page 8

Industrial refrigeration systemsthemes that impact energy efficiency

Page 9

Large difference in design vs. average load

Systems operated at fixed settings

Characteristically difficult to controlRelatively unstable due to low circuit mass

Slide valve losses are a large inefficiency

Multiple compressor sequencing challenges

Typical over-control (hunting) vs. actual load needs

Manual sequence control is common

No well developed methodology or control theory

25%+ savings potential (actual vs. ideal)

Page 10

• Equipment selection– Component Selection to Maximize Tons/kW– Sizing: base design on actual loads vs transient values

• Minimize “lift”:– Floating suction pressure, floating head pressure

• Variable speed – various applications• System design focused on:

– Reliable Proven Equipment and Design Practices– Control for Off-design conditions– Ease of Service and Low Maintenance Costs– Prepiped Packaged Solutions

Industrial refrigeration Cost and EnergyEfficiency Opportunities

Page 11

Refrigeration system “lift”E

vapo

rato

r / C

onde

nsin

g T

emp

-20

100

70

20

Low

Tem

pera

ture

Fix

ed H

ead

Low

Tem

pera

ture

Flo

atin

g H

ead

Med

ium

Tem

pF

ixed

Hea

d

Med

ium

Tem

pF

loat

ing

Hea

d

Fixed

Floating

Medium temperature systems gain more benefit from floating head pressure

Page 12

Condensers –design and selection practice

Nominal sizes stem from HVAC practiceAir cooled condensers

capacity varies with ambient Dry Bulb Temppast practice driven by limiting maximum pressuressizing TD of 10 F (LT) to 15 F (MT) unchanged for yearsbut, big range in motor size

Evap cooled condenserscapacity varies with Wet Bulb Temppast industry practice based on first cost (95 F SCT)TD declining over time: 25° >> 16° >> 10°(?)big range in fan power

Wide range of catalog efficiencies

Page 13

Variation in efficiency – air cooled

83.4

40.5

75.4

42.2 45.5

128.1

34.1

77.5

56.7

77.0

-10

10

30

50

70

90

110

130

A A A A A A B B C CManufacturer

BT

U/W

att (

10 d

egre

e T

D)

Examples of air cooled condenser specific efficiency

Page 14

Variation in efficiency – evap cooled

Examples of evap cooled condenser specific efficiency

151.7

213.3

130.2

310.6

115.3

161.8117.7

250.5

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

A A-R A A B B C CManufacturer

BT

U/W

att (

90 S

CT

, 72

WB

T)

Page 15

Heat Rejection Control:Floating Head Pressure and Variable Speed Application

Page 16

Fixed head pressure

0102030405060708090

100

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Ambient DBT Condensing Temperature

Page 17

Floating head pressure

0102030405060708090

100

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Ambient DBT Condensing Temperature

Page 18

Variable speed fan control –third power relationship

0 %

1 0 %

2 0 %

3 0 %

4 0 %

5 0 %

6 0 %

7 0 %

8 0 %

9 0 %

1 0 0 %

0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

F a n S p e e d %

Fan

Po

wer

%

Capacity varies directly with change in airflow

Fan power varies with cube of change in airflow

80% speed = 51% power

50% speed = 12% power

Page 19

Part load condenser performancevariable speed vs. fan cycling

50% capacity 50% power

80 BTUH/Watt

50% capacity 12% power

330 BTUH/Watt

On On Off Off

50% 50% 50% 50%

Specific efficiency increased by 300% with variable speed

Page 20

Floating head pressurecommon challenges

Large benefit even in moderate climatesNo brainer? Why not more widely adopted?Potential and/or perceived problems:

may require more refrigerant chargeerratic system operation, liquid feed problemssystem has too much capacity (at wrong time)oil separator velocityDefrost/ice harvest problems

Problem often NOT lower pressure itself, rather the effect of larger fluctuationsRequires understanding overall system design and engineering considerations

Page 21

Integrated heat rejection control –floating head pressure successfully

Condenser fan control, including:variable speed fanvariable setpoint control (change setpoint with weather)

Floating head pressuresavings with lower head pressuresavings with steady head pressure

Standardized approach consistent hardware configurationconsistent strategyconsistent back-up operation

Must be serviceable and understandable

Page 22

Variable setpoint FHP

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Ambient Temperature Condensing Temperature Setpoint

Page 23

Air Unit Capacity Control

Page 24

Floating Suction PressureUse your lowest temperature room as the control point.Use PID loop: As the temperature approaches the setpoint, incrementally raise the suction setpoint until stablized. If the temp goes above setpoint, slowly lower the SSP.Saving in:

Compressor loading due to increase efficiencyReduces temperature variations

Make small changes, long intervalsExcellent for storage warehousing

Page 25

Example: BHP/Ton at 15dF SST

1.1

1.12

1.14

1.16

1.18

1.2

1.22

15 15.25 15.5 15.75 16 16.25 16.5 16.75 17 17.25 17.5 17.75 18

SST

BH

P/T

on

BHP/Ton

3dF Maximum Float: Average Efficiency Gain of 2.9%

Page 26

Variable volume variable temperature air unit control

Vary fan speed in freezers and coolers as primary means of temperature controlSaving in:

Fan energyRefrigeration cooling load (at high kW/Ton)

Third power rule applies to fan powerReduce speed to 60-70% then float suctionTypical concerns and response:

Motors burn up: use right motor, don’t run too slowAir falls on the floor: education, don’t run too slowCoils won’t feed, won’t defrost: don’t run too slow, try itNot good for rooms with high product pulldown req.

Page 27

Variable Speed Screw Compressor Capacity Control

Page 28

Variable speed screw compressor control

Application does not! follow third power ruleMinimum speed: approx. 50% (Frick = 20%)

Use slide valve below 50%

Losses:Increased leakage due to lower tip speed

Minimal losses, based on manufacturers software

Varies with application condition

VFD losses: fixed and variable components, ~4% total

Savings:Depends on time at reduced capacity Requires adequate control sophistication (overall plant)Manufacturers data varies A LOT

Page 29

Capacity vs. BHP at part load

Page 30

Medium temp VFD vs. slide valve

9% improvement at 50%

Page 31

Low temp VFD vs. slide valve

12% improvement at 50%

Page 32

LT booster VFD vs. slide valve

45% improvement at 50%

Page 33

Compressor Control Strategies

Study the capacities and efficiencies of each compressor on a suction group.Bring on compressors that result in the smallest increment of capacity while maintaining 80% slide valve or more on the running compressorsUnload in the same fashionIn high demand areas, use offset suction pressure during the day, lower at night

Page 34

Demand Control in Industrial Refrigeration

Page 35

• Lower consumption (kWh) lowers demand (kW) passively.• Active Demand Control will likely increase consumption.• Dollar Savings Opportunities primarily during Peak

Demand.• Demand Costs vary by Utility and Rate Structure.• Primary Benefit during Summer Months (June-October).• Requires Active Schedule Change or Multiple Dated

Control Screens.• Demand Shifting vs Demand Control• Some Experimentation Involved.• User Specific. Must be Customized.• Not Everyone can Benefit.

Demand Management Issues

Page 37

Demand Reduction Opportunities May Be Very Limited

• Three Shift Manufacturing Plants

• Process Production Plants• Inadequate Existing Control

Systems• Seasonal Maximum Production

Coincides with Peak Rates• Insulated Envelope or

Infiltration Loads Too Great• Temperature or Humidity

Requirements Too Stringent• Limited Equipment Quantity

(e.g. batteries for lifts)

Page 45

Calculations:

Simple spreadsheet to estimate savings, generally, within 10%.

Page 46

Industrial refrigeration efficiencyLooking forward/conclusionsPotential for improved part load performance

improved load control strategies (central plants)lower head pressures with optimized condenser controlvariable speed compressor control (10-40% gains)

Performance informationreal time information – Internet basedtie to plant information, energy $ per production unitbenchmark “ideal” performance for comparison

Other refrigeration opportunities More focus on evaporator coil/fan performance: need specific efficiency criteria & control methodssmaller systems can have high performance gains

Page 47

Giving you what you want:Improved control and record keeping of refrigeration and temperature for OSHA, EPA, and USDA review.Reduction in plant maintenance due to lower speeds, lower compression ratios.

Reduced Operating Expense = MORE PROFIT!