Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.
-
Upload
juniper-miles -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.
![Page 1: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015
David TshilumbaESR3.3, WP3
![Page 2: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Background /
MSc in Mechanical engineering from University of Brussels (André Jaumotte Award)
Master thesis: “Contrôle des électro-aimants finaux d’un collisionneur linéaire”
Member of LSC (LIGO Scientific Collaboration)
Main author of 1 article, Co-author of 2 articles published in refereed journals and 3 publications in conference proceedings
LIGO: www.ligo.org
SLAC: http://www.linearcollider.org/ILC
![Page 3: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
ESR3.3, WP3 /
Contract start date: 1st April 2014
PACMAN subject: Nano-Positioning of the main LINAC quadrupole as means of laboratory pre-alignment
PhD Institution: Delft University of Technology
Secondment: Delft University + TNO (6M )
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
CERN Supervisors Kurt ARTOOS, Hélène MAINAUD DURAND
Academic supervisors Prof. Just HERDER, Prof. Jo SPRONCK
Industry supervisor Dr. Stefan KUIPER
![Page 4: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
PhD thesis/
Starting date: 1st April 2014
Thesis title: Nano-Positioning of the main LINAC quadrupole as means of laboratory pre-alignment
Statuts: Admitted to the doctoral school (Go/No Go meeting)
Credits: 45 GS credits are required; 12.5 GS credits acquired.
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 5: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Project /
To upgrade the existing type 1 prototype for nanopositioning and vibration isolation
Cross check between different components
To study the possibility to increase the range of the nanopositioning stage
ObjectivesPiezo stack actuator:Stiffness: 480 N/µmStroke: 15 µmResolution: 0.15 nm
Flexural joints:Axial stiffness: 300 N/µmRotational stiffness: 220 Nm/rad
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 6: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
State of the art
Typical applications
• Atomic force microscopy
• Semiconductor test equipment
• Scanning interferometry
Parameters ValueResolution 1nm
Travel 1m up to 300mStiffness ≤10N/μm
Admissible payload ≤10kgDynamic force
capacity≤100N
Typical specifications
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 7: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
State of the art
Performances:
Range: 10mm x 10mmParasitic in-plane rotation: ≤ 100radResolution: ≤4nmLow stiffness
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
Courtesy of S.Awtar, G. Parmar
![Page 8: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Research gap /
Study of an integrated positioning system with high stiffness (>100N/m) capable of moving heavy loads (>100 kg) with high resolution (<1nm) over a large range (≥1mm)
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
Parameters ValueResolution <0.25nm
Stroke ± 3mm step displacement 0.25 up to 50nm
Roll angle < 100radSpeed 10μm/s
Settling time t1->t2 5ms≤ts≤10msStiffness
(vertical/lateral)1/0.55 kN/μm
Vertical force (dynamic)
50N
Horizontal force (dynamic)
30NFunctions :• Nanopositioning• Vibration isolation• Alignment
![Page 9: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Project /
Range increase concept
Possible monolithic design• No friction• No backlash• No wear
Avoid plastic deformation!
n<1 Stiffness amplification Resolution improvement
in
out
x
x
a
bn
out
in
F
Fn
out
in
k
kn 2
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
Range increase concept: inverted lever mechanism
![Page 10: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Project /
Method followed
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
Analytic simplified model (Matlab)
3D CAD modelling (CATIA-Smart Team)
Static and dynamic Finite Element simulations (ANSYS)
Finite Element simulation results + Full dynamic model Positioning control algorithms
Experimental validation of positioning performances
![Page 11: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Project /
Tasks description
Development of a long rangeactuator
Requirements definition: March 15
Design of concept 1DOF: Aug 15
Performance characterization: Oct 15
Extrapolation to 2 DOFs: Sept 16
System review and upgrade: Apr 15
Positioning strategies comparison
Positioning test in CMM
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
State of the art
Adaptation of the type 1 setup of the PACMAN bench: Aug 15
PACMAN nano-positioning system
![Page 12: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Project /
Results
Parasitic resonance modes
• Design target: 1st resonance ≥100Hz • Unexpected eigen modes detected by EMA between 30Hz and 50Hz
• Suspect root cause: connection stiffness between components
• Bolting: up to 40% drop in eigen frequency• Gluing: up to 8.5% drop in eigen frequency
Courtesy of M. Guinchard
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 13: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Project /
Results
Parasitic resonance modes
Further improvement:
• Monolithic base plate design
•Additional stiffeners
Old plate (EMA) Upgraded plate (FEA)
30Hz 52Hz45Hz 75Hz52Hz 114Hz
Other root cause: variable contact on a supporting point modify interface with cam stage
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 14: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Project /
Results
1. 48.135 Hz 2. 70.269 Hz3. 123.35 Hz 4. 195.11 Hz5. 236.4 Hz6. 256.81 Hz
2 side mode + bend
1 Longitudinal + plate bend
3 Torsion
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
• Adjustable jack for system equilibrium• Optimized finite element model (1 hour)• Bending of baseplate • Lowest modes lateral and vertical components
issue
![Page 15: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Project /
Results
1 Longitudinal mode
2 Side mode 3 Torsion
1. 91.6 Hz2. 117.2 Hz3.167.14 Hz4. 244 Hz5.270.39 Hz6. 278.4 Hz
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
• Larger flat contact surface with ground • Base plate reinforcement (longitudinal)• Lowest mode in longitudinal direction
Not an issue
![Page 16: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Improvement: first lateral mode at 100Hz
Project /
Results
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 17: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Project /
Results
Roll motion reduction: parallel kinematics • Permissible roll displacement: 100μrad
• Aluminum eccentric shear pins • 5.15μrad/μm coupling
• Alternative: rotational symmetry hinges• 0.47μrad/μm coupling
• Features:• Less components• Tunable translational stiffness
•Design optimization required (Space availability)
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 18: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Training /
• Training in CATIA-SmartTeam
• Basic principles of metrology
• Experimental modal analysis
• Making Presentations
• CERN guide training
• Team building
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 19: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Secondment in TUDelft and TNO
Training /• Thesis background
• High performance mechatronic system design
• Modal analysis measurement on support structure of large mirror of a large telescope
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 20: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Conferences & workshop:
• PACMAN workshop, 02-04.02.2015one presentation
MEDSI 2016 (Mechanical Engineering Design of Synchrotron Radiation Equipment and Instrumentation)
ICM 2016 (International Conference on Mechatronics)
ICMRE (International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering)
ICMMR (International Conference on Mechanics and Mechatronics Research)
ICROM (International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics )
Outreach & Dissemination /
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 21: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Networking Opportunities /
• ACTUATOR conference (May 2014)
• Precision Fair Eindhoven (November 2014)
• Secondment at TUDelft and TNO
• EUSPEN (European Society of Precision Engineering)
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 22: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Impact /
• Mechatronic system designer
• Modelling of complex mechanical assemblies
• Improve employability
• Networking
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
![Page 23: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015
Thank you for your attention
![Page 24: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
28
Current system overview /
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
Coarse stage (cams)• locked after pre-alignment• Resolution : 0.35µm• Stroke: 3mm
Fine stage (piezo stacks)• Resolution: 0.15nm • Stiffness : 480N/um (piezo)• Useful Stroke: 5µm
Limitations: • precision of coarse stage (>10µm)• insufficient stroke of fine stage
for thermal load in tunnel ( >100µm)
Increase of range of fine stage
![Page 25: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Field gradients K for restoring force in quadrupole
K=dBy/dxK=dBx/dy
Beam trajectory technique Lorentz Force Control of beam oscillation Collision quality optimized
CLIC: NANO-POSITIONING
Courtesy of J. Pfingstner
D. Tshilumba, Delft, 15 April 2015
Beam steering /
![Page 26: Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56649f315503460f94c4c300/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
30
Nanopositioning /
David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015
30
Type 1 magnet nano-positioning: Inter-pulse sequence
1 2 3 4 Stage
Time (ms)0 t1 t2 20
• Beam divided into trains• Calculation of new positions by global controller• Positioning step of magnet• check of actual new position (machine protection)