Middleport self-build – a case study, Mick Downs
-
Upload
national-association-for-neighbourhood-management -
Category
Education
-
view
107 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Middleport self-build – a case study, Mick Downs
MIDDLEPORT
– inner city, mixture of terraced housing, social housing and industry
- Located in the area of RENEW North Staffordshire, the Housing Market
Renewal Pathfinder
- Area of Major Intervention
BURSLEM & MIDDLEPORT LOCAL FORUM
- Residents’ consultation group established by the Pathfinder
MIDLAND HEART
- Housing Association based in the area
URBAN VISION
- Architecture Centre & Community Interest Company based in the area
MIDDLEPORT SELF BUILD – A CASE STUDY
Burslem & Middleport Local Forum held a
Community Design Festival in St Paul’s
Church Middleport in March 2013.
The aim of the Festival was to promote
self-build housing development to help
regenerate the Middleport area.
46 people attended the 2 day event and
design proposals for five housing
schemes in Middleport were produced.
Funder - Design Council CABE
Organiser - Urban Vision North Staffordshire
Sponsor - Midland Heart Housing Association
Support - North Staffordshire Society of Architects
MIDDLEPORT COMMUNITY DESIGN FESTIVAL
THE AFTERMATH OF RENEW NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE
What was taken away?
400+ HOMES DEMOLISHED400+ FAMILIES DISPLACED100+ JOBS LOST
What was put back?
NEW HEALTH CENTRE33 HOMES REFURBISHED160 HOMES FACELIFTED
WHAT’S GOOD ABOUT MIDDLEPORT?
· Heritage
· Local people
· Close to Tunstall and Burslem
· The park and green spaces
· Shops in Newcastle Street
· Good transport links – road, rail and canal
· Local employers, Steelite
· New Health Centre
· The Canal
· Local skills
· Investment by Prince’s Regeneration Trust
· Good pubs
· Development opportunities – housing
· Burslem Port
· The Local Forum
WHAT’S BAD ABOUT MIDDLEPORT?
· Poor visual image – scrap yards, vacant sites, conflicting commercial uses
· Poor maintenance of private rented houses
· Demolition of people’s homes
· Plans not followed through after demolition
· Adverse effect of demolition on businesses
· Social problems
· Lack of confidence, apathy, cynicism
· Community not listened to
· Council’s master plan not adopted
· Some poor quality new development
WHAT’S NEEDS TO CHANGE?
· The community should be valued more and listened to better
· Encourage better employers
· Support small businesses
· Provide a wider range of housing –
affordable and market housing
· Provide well-designed business start-up units
· Relocate bad neighbour uses, like waste transfer station
· Create new community-led mechanisms to bring about change, such as a community
development trust
· Adopt a master plan that is supported by the community and not just the Council
· Give rate relief to enterprise units
· Encourage community-led projects
MIDDLEPORT COMMUNITY DESIGN FESTIVAL
Five sites for green self-build homes
Local people
Local businesses
Local architects
Local politicians
WE LOOKED AT FIVE SITES
SITE 1 – Oliver’s Mill / Newport House
SITE 2 – Burslem Port
SITE 3 – Middleport Hub
SITE 4 – Newport Lane
SITE 5 – Travers Street / Harper Street
PEOPLE AT THE COMMUNITY DESIGN
FESTIVAL
PEOPLE AT THE COMMUNITY DESIGN
FESTIVAL
PEOPLE AT THE COMMUNITY DESIGN
FESTIVAL
PROPOSAL FOR SITE 1 OLIVER’S MILL
• Scrap yard use re-located
to industrial estate elsewhere
• Canal side housing with
sunspaces and photovoltaic
panels on south side
• Listed Oliver’s Mill
converted to enterprise units
PROPOSAL FOR SITE 1 OLIVER’S MILL
PROPOSAL FOR SITE 2 - BURSLEM PORT WHARF
• Waste transfer station re-located to
industrial estate elsewhere
• Marina / mooring for canal boats
• Café and boaters’ facilities
• Eco-friendly, colourful marina homes
with wetland and boardwalks
• Wharf building converted to
community centre
PROPOSAL FOR SITE 2 - BURSLEM PORT
WHARF
PROPOSAL FOR SITE 3 – MIDDLEPORT HUB
• This crossroads turned into a remarkable
concentration of small industrial uses and
homes, with eco features making positive use
of waste and mitigating noise.
• New feature chimney atop a district heating
system and attractive new community
buildings to revive the spirit of the much-missed
Middleport Club
PROPOSAL FOR SITE 3 – MIDDLEPORT HUB
PROPOSAL FOR SITE 4 – NEWPORT LANE
• This scheme maintained the heritage
character of Newport Lane while creating an
ultra-modern two story community
development with orchards and a brand new
road to improve the link to Middleport Pottery.
PROPOSAL FOR SITE 4 – NEWPORT LANE
PROPOSAL FOR SITE 5 – TRAVERS STREET
• This proposal aims to keep the boarded up houses in Travers Street and
Harper Street and convert them into a mixture of 3-bedroom family homes
with older persons accommodation on the ground floor.
• Some ground floor units would be work spaces associated with the
houses – making live / work units.
• Some units would be short rentals for visitors to local tourist destinations,
such as Middleport Pottery.
PROPOSAL FOR SITE 5 – TRAVERS STREET
FOLLOW UP ACTIONS
Formal proposal to Stoke-on-Trent City Council asking that Travers Street be not demolished and the Local Forum given the opportunity to seek funding to recruit self-builders, work up a detailed scheme and carry out the proposed development.
Rejected by the City Council, but Local Forum invited to look at one of the other sites – Newport Lane – once it had been cleared by the Council.
CURRENT POSITION
The Local Forum has become a formally constituted group, to qualify for HCA support.
An application has been made to the Homes and Communities Agency for grant to produce a detailed scheme for the Newport Lane site, and make a planning application for it (not a CRTBO).
If the HCA application is approved, the Local Forum will start to recruit potential self-builders and will work with them to develop designs for a group of eco-homes on the Newport Lane site (which is now cleared).
Postscript – the Prince’s Regeneration Trust, which is refurbishing Middleport Pottery, has been given the Travers Street terrace so the Trust can refurbish the boarded-up houses.