Midas Civil
description
Transcript of Midas Civil
Steel I-Girder Design with special attention to Eurocode provisions
Vidish A. Iyer
Structural Engineer and CAE consultant at Midas IT
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
2
midas Civil
• About Midas IT
• About Midas Civil
• Modeling Philosophy
• Design Philosophy and Eurocode specifications
• BS vs EC design for Composite structures.
CONTENTS
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
CONTENTS
MIDAS Programs were being developed since 1989 and have been used commercially since 1996.
With our headquarters in South Korea , we currently have corporate offices in Beijing, Shanghai, Detroit, Dallas, Europe, India and Japan and are ever expanding .
One of the Largest civil analysis software developers
Proven Reliability with over 5,000 project applications
Intensive quality control system
Analyses verified by various institutions
CONTENTS
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
ABOUT MIDAS IT
We shall soon be opening a new branch in Singapore
Integrated Solution System for Bridge and Civil Engineeringmidas Civil
What is midas Civil?
General Purpose
Special Purpose
FEM FBM BEM
Structural Engineer
Geotechnical Engineer
Bridge Underground Structure Building
Plant Tunnel Dam
Why midas Civil
CONTENTS
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
WHAT IS MIDAS CIVIL ?
2-D 3-D
Integrated Solution System for Bridge and Civil Engineeringmidas Civil
What kind of bridge type can midas Civil handle?
Conventional Bridge
Staged Segmental Bridge
Cable-stayed Bridge & Suspension Bridge
Why midas Civil
CONTENTS
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
WHAT TYPES OF BRIDGES CAN IT HANDLE ?
Integrated Solution System for Bridge and Civil Engineeringmidas Civil
CONTENTS
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
MODELING PHILOSOPHY
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
7
midas Civil
Three main modeling methods
• 2D Grillage models
• 3D Grillage models
• Meshed Finite Element model
MODELING
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
8
midas Civil
• Most common modeling method
• Modeled as orthogonal or skewed grillage depending on site requirements
2D MODELING
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
9
midas Civil
• Usual grillage modeling principles apply
• For multi-girder bridges , shear lag is unlikely to reduce the effective slab width below the slab actual width . Usually models for bare steel condition , short term composite condition and long term composite condition are required.
• Section properties for the composite main beams should use the full composite second moment of inertia. Intermediate longitudinal elements should be given properties of slab only.
• Torsional stiffness of the slab should be divided equally between transverse and longitudinal beams. ( bt3/6 in each direction )
• Intermediate bracings should be modeled
2D MODELING
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
10
midas Civil
• 3D Grillages are quite useful when dealing with ladder deck bridges
3D GRILLAGE MODELING
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
11
midas Civil
• Vertical Bending is assigned wholly to the upper members while bottom flange elements represent only the plan bending of these flanges.
• Although this model captures the local effects in a better fashion , it is still not possible to separate the global and local effects .
3D GRILLAGE MODELING
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
12
midas Civil
• More realistic structural response. Accurate representation of local and global responses.
• Models can be built using combination of plate and beam elements .
FINITE ELEMENT MODELING
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
13
midas Civil
There are several actions on any structure that are not normally accounted for without construction stage analysis . These include :
• Creep , Shrinkage and Time dependent strength variation effects
• Locked in stresses arising from staged construction , material defects etc.
• Prestress Losses
• Accounting for the pouring sequence of the deck slab.
• Accurate deflections – these directly affect the erection process and camber
For composite structures in particular the pouring sequence, creep , shrinkage , strength variation and locked in stresses are of great import since these factors can significantly affect the overall design.
Construction Stage Analysis
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
14
midas Civil
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
15
midas Civil
• Required Codes :
1) EN 1990 – Load combinations
2) EN 1991-2 – Moving loads
3) EN 1991-1-1 – Densities of materials
4) EN 1991-1-4 – Wind Actions
5) EN 1991-1-5 – Temperature actions
6) EN 1993-1-1 – Design of steel structures
7) EN 1993-1-5 – Plated Structural Elements ( for LTB )
8) EN 1993-1-9 - Fatigue
9) EN 1994-2 – Design of composite structures ( bridges )
10) EN 1997 – Geotechnical Design
11) EN 1998 – Seismic Design
12) National Annexes to above codes
DESIGN CODES
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
16
midas Civil
Ultimate Limit State :
• Bending Resistance
• Shear Resistance
• Lateral Torsional Buckling
• Fatigue Resistance
Serviceability Limit State :
• Deformation
• Crack Control
• Stress Checks
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
17
midas Civil
• Classification of Sections – 4 classes as per EC3 -1-1
1) Class 1- can form plastic hinge with rotation capacity
2) Class 2 – can form plastic hinge but limited rotation capacity
3) Class 3 – can fully develop elastic resistance across section
4) Class 4- buckles before elastic limit is reached
DESIGN PROCEDURE OVERVIEW
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
18
midas Civil
• Plastic bending resistance for Classes 1&2
• Resistance is for Effective Cross Section ( allowances for Shear lag & local buckling for class 4)
BENDING RESISTANCE
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
19
midas Civil
The elastic resistance for classes 3&4 can be calculated from the equation :
Where Ma,Ed is design moment in steel section alone (during constn. Stage)
Mc,Ed is design moment in composite section (after construction)
k is an amplifying factor that causes the stress limit to be reached in
steel or reinforcement (whichever is first )
ELASTIC MOMENT OF RESISTANCE
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
20
midas Civil
• In composite beam sections, shear resistance is simply taken as that of the steel section.
• There are two basic components : Vertical shear resistance and buckling shear resistance ( Both taken from EC3)
• For shear buckling , contributions from web and flange are dealt separately ( refer EC 3-1-1 , cl. 5.1,2,3,8)
• For contribution from the flange , in case of composite beams the bottom flange should be used for shear resistance calculation – even if it is larger .
SHEAR RESISTANCE IN BEAM WEBS
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
21
midas Civil
BENDING AND SHEAR INTERACTION
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
22
midas Civil
• For composite beams , buckling usually happens in the bottom flanges when they are in compression .
• Here buckling is not true lateral torsional buckling but rather a distortional buckling
• Nevertheless , EC 3 & 4 prescribe rules for LTB based on non dimensional slenderness
BUCKLING RESISTANCE
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
23
midas Civil
• The following sets of equations are used :
The relationship between χ LT and λLT can be seen from EC3-1-1
BUCKLING RESISTANCE
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
24
midas Civil
• A simplified method , as outlined in EN 1993-1-1 is often used for calculating the buckling resistance .
BUCKLING RESISTANCE
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
25
midas Civil
• Restraint effect in Integral Bridges
• Beams curved in plan – presence of radial force necessitates provision of lateral restraints at intervals
• Flange curved in elevation – presence of vertical radial force which results in transverse plan bending of flange and vertical stresses in web.
• Plan bending from interaction with cross girders – of special concern in ladder decks where vehicle loading may induce lateral actions.
OTHER EFFECTS IN MAIN GIRDERS
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
26
midas Civil
• Fatigue is the progressive and localized structural damage that occurs when a material is subjected to cyclic loading
• For road bridges , the Eurocode advises the use of EN 1992-2 and EN 1992-3 by using fatigue load model LM 3 (basically it’s a moving load analysis)
• EN 1993-2 and EN 1993-1-9 should be referred to for detailed provisions regarding fatigue
• Per these codes :
a) Determine the stress range Δσp due to the passage of the fatigue load model 3 vehicle
b) Determine damage equivalence factor λ.
c) Determine the design value of the stress range
Fatigue Analysis
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
27
midas Civil
• Basic Check for fatigue :
Δσc is the reference value of fatigue strength at 2 x 106 cycles, which is numerically the same as the relevant detail category according to BS EN 1993-1-9 Tables 8.1 to 8.10.
Fatigue Analysis
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
28
midas Civil
Three categories of combinations of actions are proposed in EN:
• characteristic (normally used for irreversible limit states, e.g. for exceeding of some cracking limits in concrete)
• frequent (is normally used for reversible limit states) and
• quasi-permanent (is normally used for assessment of long-term effects)
Serviceability Limit State – Load Combinations
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
29
midas Civil
• Stress checks are done as per SLS combinations for unfactored values of characteristic actions.
• Basically there should be no inelastic behavior.
• Stress limits in Concrete , steel , reinforcement and studs are reduced by certain values ( k factors )
Serviceability Limit State - Stress
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
30
midas Civil
• EC 4 refers us to EC 3-2 for deflection limits.
• Basically deformations are calculated from the Frequent load combinations
• EC 3 is silent on any actual limits for deformation . Normal practices for deflection limits can apply . National annexes should also be referred to .
Serviceability Limit State - Deflection
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
31
midas Civil
• The Eurocode advises section 7.4.2 of EC4-2 which prescribes minimum reinforcement in lieu of more accurate method and describes this as a conservative approach.
Serviceability Limit State – Crack Control
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
32
midas Civil
• For direct loading, limitation of crack widths can be achieved by limiting bar spacing /bar diameter as per the following tables
Serviceability Limit State – Crack Control
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
33
midas Civil
• Although it would seem that the Eurocodes represent a significant departure from the earlier BS code practices , the two are closer than they appear .
• The differences are not that numerous and most of the design practices and methods are quite similar in both codes.
• The next few slides highlight some major points of difference between EC4 and BS-5950-3 provisions for composite design.
DESIGN PROCEDURE – BS VS EC
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
34
midas Civil
EC 4 – concrete strength is taken from cylinder
BS – concrete strength is taken from Cube
Sample : C20/25 ( cube str = 25 , cyl str =20 )
CONCRETE STRENGTH
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
35
midas Civil
• BS 5950-3: characteristic resistance of studs in solid slabs is given for various combinations of height, diameter and concrete strength.
• EC4 calculates the resistance as the minimum of two equations – one for failure of concrete by crushing and one for shearing of the stud
SHEAR CONNECTION
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
36
midas Civil
The graph below shows a comparison for stud resistance between EC4 and BS 5950-3.
SHEAR CONNECTION
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
37
midas Civil
Minimum Shear Connection Requirements – BS code simply states these as a function of span length but Eurocodes consider asymmetry of the section as well.
SHEAR CONNECTION
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
38
midas Civil
• As per British code , Eff. Width = Span/8 subject to conditions
• For Eurocodes it varies along the length of the beam
EFFECTIVE WIDTH
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
39
midas Civil
• Different Shear Areas for BS and EC ( slightly larger for EC than for BS )
VERTICAL SHEAR
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
40
midas Civil
THANK YOU
Bridging Your Innovations to RealitiesClick to edit Master title style Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
41
midas Civil
http://en.midasuser.com
Contact : [email protected]@midasit.com