MID Region Annual Safety Report · 2014-05-19 · MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second...
Transcript of MID Region Annual Safety Report · 2014-05-19 · MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second...
RASG-MID Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 1 -
Regional Aviation Safety Group -
Middle East
(RASG-MID)
MID Region
Annual Safety Report
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
Second Edition, January 2014 Regional Aviation Safety Group – Middle East (RASG-MID) This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Regional Aviation Safety Group – Middle East (RASG-MID) in the interest of information exchange. The RASG-MID assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof.
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 1 -
RASG-MID
Annual Safety Report
Table of contents 1. Executive Summary…………...…………………………………………………………………………. 2 1.1 Regional Traffic Volumes…………………………………………………………………………….3 2. Safety Information and Analysis…………………………………………………………………………4 2.1 Reactive Safety Information………………………………………………………………………....4 2.1.1 Regional Accidents Rates …………………………….……………………………………….…4 2.1.2 Regional Fatal Accidents …………………………….……………………………………. …...5 2.1.3 Analysis of MID Accidents between 2008 and 2012 ……………………………………... …...5 2.1.3.1 Accidents categories and analysis…………………………………………………….......... 5 2.1.3.2 Safety Focus Areas for MID Region (2008 to 2012)..……………………………………....9 2.1.3.3 MID Region Safety Performance – Safety Indicators(Reactive)…………………….. ....12 2.2 Proactive Safety Information……………………………………………………………………… 13 2.2.1 Analysis of Audits……………………………………………………………………................ 13 2.2.1.1 ICAO USOAP-CMA ……………………....………………………………………............ 13 2.2.1.2 IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) ………………....…………………………….….……... 15 2.2.1.3 IATA Safety Audit for Ground Operations (ISAGO) .……………..…………............................ 15 2.2.2 Analysis of incidents and occurrences……………………………………………………...… 17 2.2.2.1 Incidents and Occurrences Reported by States ………………………………………… 17 2.2.2.2 STEADES data ………………………………………………………………………….… 18 2.2.2.3 Incidents and occurences reported by airlines ………………………………………….. 20 2.2.3 On demand analysis of identified risks or hazards………………………………………….. 21 2.2.3.1 Call-sign Confusion………………………………………………………………………... 21 2.2.3.2 Laser Attack ………………………………………………………………………………..22 2.2.4 MID Region Safety Performance – Safety Indicators (Proactive) …………………………..23 2.3 Predictive Safety information……………………………………………………………………....24 2.3.1 FDM Trends and FOQA Data………………………………………………………………….24 2.3.1.1 FDX data …………………………………………………………………………………....24 2.3.2 Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment…………………………………………………..25 2.3.2.1 State Safety Program (SSP) ……………………………………………………………….25 3. Final Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………............27 List of Acronyms ………………………………………………………………………………….................28
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 2 -
1. Executive Summary The objective of the RASG-MID Annual Safety Report is to gather safety information from different stakeholders and to identify the main aviation safety risks in the Middle East Region in order to deploy mitigation actions for enhancing aviation safety in a coordinated manner. Every entity involved in aviation safety collects safety data and produces safety information with a different perspective. To ensure that all safety efforts are properly coordinated, the region should first agree on the key risks areas. The Second RASG-MID Annual Safety Report provides Member States and the aviation community with a high-level analysis of the air transport safety trends and indicators in the MID Region. It presents a snapshot of safety performance within the civil aviation system in the MID Region, while providing helpful information about the numerous efforts to develop collaborative responses to safety concerns at the National and Regional level. It comprises three main sections, one for each safety information category: 1. Reactive Information 2. Proactive Information 3. Predictive Information The safety information presented in this report is based on the compilation and analysis of data provided by: Boeing, the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), airline operators, and States. Analysis of the reactive safety information showed that the three top fatal accident categories for the 2008-2012 period are: 1. Runway and Ground Safety (RGS) 2. Loss of Control In-flight (LOC-I) 3. Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) By contrast, the proactive safety information in this report, extracted from the results of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP), showed that 77% of audited Sates in the MID Region are with overall effective implementation (EI) over 60%. It should be noted that the Reactive Information represents the largest portion of the Report. As the system matures and the processes for the collection of predictive information in the MID Region are established, balance between the contents of the three sections will be reached. RASG-MID is committed to improving aviation safety and enabling seamless cooperation and communication among the main aviation safety stakeholders in the MID Region.
1.1 R
Traffic Million de
Traffic Million de
Regional Tr
Note:
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Num
ber o
f dep
atur
es
eparture
eparture
MID Reg
raffic Volum
An
: For the analy
2008
2008
0.772
2008
0.990
gion Annual
mes
Regionually Schedu
Sour
RegioAnn
yses carried o
2009
200
0.87
200
1.10
Safety Repo
- 3 -
nal Traffic Vouled Commerrce: ICAO-iSTA
nal Traffic Voually DepartuSource: IATA
out in this rep
2010
9
77
09
05
ort – Second
olume rcial Departur
TARS
olume ures
port, the IATA
0 20
2010
0.923
2010
1.250
d Edition
res
A traffic data w
011 2
2011
1.032
2011
1.282
was used.
2012
2012
1.07
2012
1.41
2
7
2
10
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 4 -
2. Safety Information and Analysis
The following sections show the results of safety information analysis grouped as reactive, proactive and predictive safety information.
2.1 Reactive Safety Information
In accordance with the MID Region Safety Strategy, it was agreed to progressively reduce the accident rate to be in line with the global average by the end of 2017.
The process followed by the Annual Safety Report Team (ASRT) to analyse reactive information consisted of retrieving safety data from IATA, ICAO and Boeing. For the IATA data, an effort was required to narrow the search to include only the fifteen (15) States of the Middle East Region.
2.1.1 Regional Accidents Rates
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
MID Accident Nr. 8 12 6 6 2 Accident rate 8.06 11.78 6.43 6.23 2.13
World rate 3.17 2.69 2.73 2.58 2.06
9.07
4.734.40
8.06
11.78
6.43 6.23
2.13
3.46
2.342.92 3.17
2.69 2.73 2.58
2.06
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Ac
cid
en
ts p
er
Mil
lio
n S
ec
tors
All Accident Rate
MID World Source: IATASector data from April 2013 JOS Extract
2.1.2 R
Year
MID
World
2.1.3 A
T
2.1.3.1 A a)
Regional Fata
Analysis of M
his analysis p
Accidents cat
) World Acc
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
2
0%5%
10%15%20%25%
MID Reg
al Accidents
2008
4.03
0.67
MID Accidents
provides an ov
tegories and
cident Categ
2008 2
gion Annual
2009
3.62
0.54
Regional F
s between 20
verview of the
analysis
gories: 2008-2
009 20
Safety Repo
- 5 -
atal AccidentSource
008 and 2012
e accidents b
2012
010 20
ort – Second
2010
1.61
0.67
ts Per Milion : IATA
2
between 01 Ja
11 201
d Edition
2011
0.78
0.62
Depature
an 2008 and 3
12
M
W
2
0
0
31 Dec 2012.
ID
orld
2012
0.71
0.41
.
b
c)
) MID A
) World Acc
0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%14%16%18%20%
0
50
100
150
200
250
Nu
mb
er
of
Ac
cid
en
ts
W
MID Reg
Accident Cate
cident Flight
World Accide
gion Annual
egories: 2008
t Phases: 200
nts by Phas
F
Safety Repo
- 6 -
8-2012
08-2012
se of Flight
Fatal Not Fa
ort – Second
atal
d Edition
Source: IATA
d
e)
) MID Accid
) World Fat
i. Categ
0
5
10
15
20
25N
um
be
r o
f A
cc
ide
nts
M
11223344
MID Reg
dent Flight P
tal Accident C
ories
MID Acciden
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%
gion Annual
hases: 2008-
Categories a
nts by Phas
Safety Repo
- 7 -
-2012
and Phases
se of Flight
Fatal No
ort – Second
ot Fatal
d Edition
Source: I
ATA
f)
ii. Phase
MID Fatal
i. Categ
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
05
101520253035404550
MID Reg
es
Accident Ca
ories
ESD RTO
%%%%%%%%%%%
Undersh
gion Annual
ategories and
TXI DST
hoot InsuffiInform
Safety Repo
- 8 -
d Phases
T TOF E
icientmation
ConFligh
Terra
ort – Second
ECL GOA
trolledht Intoin (CFIT)
RuT
Ex
d Edition
ICL CRZ
unway /Taxiwayxcursion
Los
LND AP
ss of ControlIn-flight
PR
2.1.3.2 S
Th
ii. Flight
afety Focus
aking a morighlighted:
1. All acc2. All MID
rate by3. The m
i. Rii. Liii. Hiv. Gv. In
4. Top C
i. Sii. Aiii. Miv. Sv. Uvi. Lvii. Mviii. O
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
MID Reg
Phases
Areas for th
re in-depth l
cident rate in tD accident ray an average
most frequent a
Runway / TaxiLoss of ControHard Landing Gear-up Landn-flight Dama
ontributing Fa
Safety ManageAircraft MalfunMaintenance ESOP AdherencUnstable ApprLog/floated/boMonitor/cross Overall crew p
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
APR
gion Annual
e MID Regio
look at the
the MID regioate among noof 6.23. accident cate
iway Excursiool In-flight
ing / Gear Coge
actors are:
ement nction Events ce / SOP Croroaches ounced/firm/ofcheck
performance
TOF
Safety Repo
- 9 -
n (2008 to 20
accidents st
on was aboveon-IOSA regis
egories for the
ons
ollapse
oss-verificatio
ff-centre/crab
CRZ
ort – Second
012)
tatistics for t
e the World acstered operat
e period 2008
n
bbed land
GOA
d Edition
the MID Reg
ccident rate btors was abo
8 – 2012 for th
A LN
gion, the fol
by an averageve the World
he MID Regio
ND
lowing is
e of 3.86. d accident
on are:
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 10 -
5. Top Two flight phases when accidents occur in the MID region are LND and TOF 6. Top three fatal accidents categories for the MID region are;
i. LOC-I ii. Runway/Taxiway Excursions iii. CFIT
In order to facilitate the identification and prioritization of the main Focus Areas (FAs), the accidents are categorized in term of frequency and severity. The severity assessment is based on the fatalities, injuries and damage to aircraft, property and equipment. The level of severity is categorized as follows:
1- Catastrophic: multiple deaths; serious damage to aircraft/equipment (destroyed); 2- Major: serious injury/fatalities; major aircraft/equipment damage; and 3- Minor: little consequences.
Accordingly, the following matrix shows the assessment for the top accidents categories;
Frequency
Severity
1 2 3 4 5
1 1 2 3 4 5
2 2 4 6 8 10
3 3 6 9 12 15
Loss of Control In-flight (LOC-I)
1. Trend 2008 to 2012
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
MID Accident Nr. 3 3 0 1 0 Accident rate 3.02 2.72 0 0.78 0
World rate 0.41 0.41 0.27 0.29 0.22
2. Severity of Outcomes Fatal Accident Nr. 6Non-Fatal Accident Nr. 1Total Fatalities 415
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 11 -
Runway Excursion
1. Trend 2008 to 2012
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
MID Accident Nr. 1 2 1 3 1 Accident rate 1.01 1.81 0.80 2.34 0.71
World rate 0.81 0.69 0.58 0.48 0.58
2. Severity of Outcomes Fatal Accident Nr. 2Non-Fatal Accident Nr. 6Total Fatalities 49
Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT)
1. Trend 2008 to 2012
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
MID Accident Nr. 0 0 1 0 1 Accident rate 0 0 0.80 0 0.71
World rate 0.20 0.06 0.20 0.28 0.16
2. Severity of Outcomes Fatal Accident Nr. 2Non-Fatal Accident Nr. 0Total Fatalities 135
In-flight Damage
1. Trend 2008 to 2012
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
MID Accident Nr. 2 1 1 0 0 Accident rate 2.02 0.91 0.80 0 0
World rate 0.47 0.27 0.26 0.14 0.11
2. Severity of Outcomes Fatal Accident Nr. 0Non-Fatal Accident Nr. 4Total Fatalities 0
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 12 -
In accordance with the agreed matrix for the assessment of the top accidents categories, the following table represents the categorization/assessment for the MID Region:
Based on the above, the top three (3) Focus Areas (FAs) in the MID Region are: a) Runway and Ground Safety (including RWY/TWY Excursions); b) Loss of Control In-flight (LOC-I); and c) Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
2.1.3.3 MID Region Safety Performance - Safety Indicators (Reactive)
Safety Indicator Safety Target MID Remark Number of accidents per million departures
Reduce the accident rate to be in line with the global average by the end of 2017
2.13 (2012)
World 2.06 (2012)
Number of fatal accidents per million departures
Reduce the rate of fatal accidents to be in line with the global average by the end of 2017.
0.71 (2012)
World 0.41 (2012)
Number of Runway excursion-related accidents as a percentage of all accidents
Reduce Runway Excursions-related accidents by 50% by the end of 2017
Refer to the table below
Number of LOC-I related accidents as a percentage of all accidents
Reduce LOC-I related accidents by 50% by the end of 2017
Refer to the table below
Number of In-flight Damage related accidents as a percentage of all accidents
Reduce In-flight Damage related accidents by 50% by the end of 2017
Refer to the table below
Number of CFIT related accidents as a percentage of all accidents
Maintain CFIT related accidents below the global rate
Refer to the table below
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 MID Total accident 8 12 6 6 2
MID RWY Excursions-related accidents 1 2 1 3 1 % of All Accidents 12.5% 16.7% 16.7% 50% 50%
MID LOC-I -related accidents 3 3 0 1 0 % of All Accidents 37.5% 25% 0% 16.7% 0%
MID In-flight Damage -related accidents 2 1 1 0 0 % of All Accidents 25% 8.3% 16.7% 0% 0%
MID CFIT -related accidents 0 0 1 0 1 % of All Accidents 0% 0% 16.7% 0% 50%
Accident Category Frequency Severity Frequency/Severity Runway / Taxiway Excursions 1 2 2 Loss of Control In-flight 2 1 2 Hard Landing 3 3 9 Gear-up Landing / Gear Collapse 4 3 12 In-flight Damage 5 2 10 Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
6 1 6
2.2 P
Tad
2.2.1 A
2.2.1.1 IC
TissiIC TeSreA Npuch
Proactive S
his section odditional risk
Analysis of A
CAO USOAP
he Average Os 69.85%, whince January CAO Coordina
he results ofither show thtate’s Safety
elated to QuaAreas of PEL,
Note: The EI vublished fromhanges in the
MID Reg
Safety Infor
of the Annuaareas in orde
udits
-CMA
Overall EI of thich is above 2013, the EI ated Validatio
f the ICAO Ue Effective ImOversight Sy
alification andOPS and AIR
values may dm the period e protocol que
Average
Effect
gion Annual
rmation
al Safety Reer to be addre
the audited Sthe World A
is continuouson Missions (I
Universal Safemplementatioystem or the d Training of TR still show th
differ slightly 2006 to 2010
estion groupin
e Overall EI o
tive Impleme
Safety Repo
- 13 -
port focusesessed under th
States (Only 1Average 61.70sly updated toCVMs).
ety Oversightn (EI) in refeEI per Audit Technical Sta
he highest EI i
from those p0 due to chang structure p
of the Audite
entation (EI)
ort – Second
s on proactivhe emerging
13 States hav0 %. As the o reflect resul
t Audit Progrrence to the Areas. The l
aff involved inin the MID Re
published in tanges in the performed sinc
ed States in t
per Critical E
d Edition
ve safety datrisks area.
ve been auditCMA has bets from CMA
ramme (USOeight critical owest EI remn carrying ouegion.
he USOAP aEI calculationce the State's
the MID Reg
Element (CE
ta analysis to
ted) in the MIeen officially activities incl
OAP) are preselements (CE
mains in CE4 ut regulatory f
audit reports n algorithm as audit.
ion
E)
o identify
D Region launched luding the
sented to Es) of the (46.49%) functions.
that were as well as
C
T1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10
Currently, the p
he following S- Bahrain - Egypt - Iran - Jordan - Kuwait - Oman - Qatar - Saudi Arab- Sudan 0- UAE
MID Reg
E
percentage o
Audited
States are wit
bia
gion Annual
Effective Imp
f audited Sate
Sates in the
th an overall E
Safety Repo
- 14 -
plementation
es in the MID
MID Region
EI over 60%:
ort – Second
n (EI) per Aud
D Region with
n with an ove
d Edition
dit Area
an overall EI
erall EI over 6
over 60% is
60%
77%.
2.2.1.2 IA TD T
A
2.2.1.3 IA Tan Aanau
ATA Operatio
he IOSA audDecember 201
otal number o
Average findin
ATA Safety A
he ISAGO aund January 2
A total of 131 nalysis coverudits, 579 find
MID Reg
onal Safety A
it results ana10.
of captured re
gs per audit p
Audit for Gro
udit results a012.
audit reportsring all 8 IATAdings coming
gion Annual
Audit (IOSA)
alysis captured
eports is 179
per region are
und Operatio
analysis captu
s (36 corporaA regions. Th from station
Safety Repo
- 15 -
d under this s
distributed in
e as follows:
ons (ISAGO)
ured under th
ate, 28 combihe 131 auditsaudits and 54
ort – Second
section cover
the regions a
)
his section co
ined and 67 s resulted in 246 findings co
d Edition
r the period b
as follows:
over the perio
station) have213 findings coming from co
between July
od between M
e been includcoming from ombined audi
2009 and
May 2010
ded in the corporate its.
MID Reg
gion Annual Safety Repo
- 16 -
Corporate A
Station A
Combined A
ort – Second
Audits:
Audit:
Audits:
d Edition
2.2.2 A
2.2.2.1 In AAtorewAqu 1us 2W 3 4m
F
Analysis of in
ncidents and
As part of theAnnual Safety o the RASG-Melated to incid
were considerAnnual Safety
uestions:
. What as with details
. How mWhat is the av
. How d
. What amaintained wit
rom the recei
-
- - - - -
MID Reg
ncidents and
d Occurrence
e proactive dReport by pr
MID/2 Concludents and safred confidenty Report. No
are the top 5; flight phase,
many of theseerage respon
o you rate yo
are the main thin your orga
ived informati
ATC Repo(non-adherDiversions;Level Bust;unstable apCFIT; and Wake Turb
gion Annual
Distribu
occurrences
es Reported
ata analysis,roviding incidsion 2/1, the fety occurrenctial and only otwithstanding
5 reported inc, root causes,
e reports arense time for in
our voluntary r
three challenanization and
ion, the top 5
rts including rence to FPL
pproach;
ulence.
Safety Repo
- 17 -
ution of Findi
s
by States
States and dents/occurrenICAO MID Rces. All data de-identified
g, only five
cidents/occurr, and actions
e closed and nvestigating a
reporting syst
nges you facewithin your h
reported inci
conflicting trroute);
ort – Second
ings for MEN
airlines havences data. Inegional Officeand informat
d information (5) States
rences that ytaken?
how many rany incident o
tem?
e with regardsome base op
dents/occurre
raffic (unknow
d Edition
NA:
e been inviten this respecte urged Statetion provided and analysisprovided rep
you come acr
remain pendinr occurrence?
s to ensuring perators?
ences are as
wn traffic) an
ed to contribu, as a follow-
es to provide by States an
s are reflecteplies to the
ross? Can yo
ng without a ?
that a safety
follows:
nd airspace d
ute to the -up action their data
nd airlines ed in the following
u provide
solution?
culture is
deviations
A
2.2.2.2 S Tsainsaas T S
Fse
And the main r- - -
TEADES dat
he Safety Trafety inciden
ncident reportafety mitigatiossess and es
he scope of a
TEADES cap
1. Altitude d2. Birdstrik3. Configur4. Configur5. Deep lan6. EGPWS7. EGPWS8. Hard/hea9. Stall war10. Rejected11. Runway/12. TCAS R13. Unstable14. Engine I
or the purposections of the
MID Reg
reported root Human erroMET conditAircraft sys
ta
rend Evaluatit data manats. Safety treon, provides tablish safety
analysis captu
ptures the follo
deviation e ration warningration warningnding
S/GPWS warnS/GPWS Windavy landing rning d take-off /taxiway incuA e approach n-flight Shutd
se of this repoe report and s
gion Annual
causes: ors (non-comtions (wind sh
stem failure/m
ion, Analysisgement and
end analysis rates on key
y performance
ured in this re
owing events
g – Flaps g – Gear
ning dshear
rsion
down
ort, some evehow trends th
Re
Safety Repo
- 18 -
pliance with phear); and
malfunction.
& Data Excanalysis pro
using STEADy safety perfe targets.
eport covers th
;
ents are captuhat can suppo
eporting Cultu
ort – Second
procedures, la
change Systeogram. It is aDES is includformance ind
he period Q4
ured to comport the work o
ure
d Edition
ack of awaren
em (STEADEa database oded in this re
dicators, and
2011 to Q1 2
plement the aof RASG-MID
ness, etc);
ES) is IATA’sof de-identifieeport allows helps to con
2013.
analysis unde.
s aviation ed airline proactive
ntinuously
r different
MID Reggion Annual
Runwa
Safety Repo
- 19 -
Birds
ay/taxiway Inc
ort – Second
trike
cursion
d Edition
2.2.2.3 In Ane Ta
ncidents and
ATS incidents eed to be add
he following irlines to the I
CommuA
Aeronautical aA
Ab
Grou
MID Reg
d occurrence
reported by adressed.
analysis andIATA MENA O
Airside Infranication and NAir Traffic Manand Airport InfAirport Ground
bnormal APP, LAbnorma
Airund Collision o
Runway Bird Strike
Las
gion Annual
s reported b
airlines in the
d charts takeOffice for the
0
astructureNaviagtionnagementformationd Services
WeatherMET
LNG, GOAl Take Offr Collisionr DamageIncursion
e and FODser attack
Safety Repo
- 20 -
Unstable A
by airlines
e MID region w
s into considperiod Janua
5 10
ort – Second
Approach
were collecte
deration repoary 2011 till Ju
15 20
d Edition
ed to highligh
rted incidentsuly 2013.
25 30 3
t safety risk a
s and occurr
35 40 45
areas that
rences by
5
2013
2012
2011
Tar
2.2.3 O
2.2.3.1 C
Ppeco TRto T 1
he major incre:
1. Laser 2. Comm3. Air Tra4. Airside
On demand a
Call-sign Con
ursuant to theriod of timeonfirm the cat
he call-sign cRegion. Respoo report, and o
he following c
. Airline Res
MID Reg
idents catego
Attacks munication andaffic Manageme Infrastructur
nalysis of id
nfusion
e RASG-MID, to ascertaintegories of co
confusion survonses from 9 one reported
charts illustrat
sponses
Call-s
Call-si
Aircr
Loss of Com
Loss o
gion Annual
ories for the
d Navigationment re
entified risks
D/2 meeting, an the magnituontributing fac
vey was distrairlines wereno occurrenc
te the collecte
sign Similarity
gn Confusion
raft Proximity
Level Bust
mmunication
of Separation
Fre
Safety Repo
- 21 -
MID region b
s or hazards
a study was laude of the sactors in the M
ributed to thee received. Foces in the MID
ed responses
Nature
Frequenc
0 1 2
equency
ort – Second
based on rep
s
aunched to cafety risk resuID Region.
29 IATA meour airlines reD region.
s.
of Occurrenc
cy of Occurre
2 3 4
of Occu
d Edition
ports received
collect reliableulting from ca
mbers and aeported that t
ce
nce
5 6
urrence
d directly from
e data over a all-sign confu
ll 15 States inthey have no
7
2
2
2
20
20
20
m airlines
specified sion, and
n the MID incidents
012
011
010
010
011
012
2 Laseth
.2.3.2 Laser
aser attack hecurity. A surhe next edition
MID Reg
Attack
as been idenrvey will be cn of the Annu
gion Annual
tified as a risconducted anual Safety Rep
Safety Repo
- 22 -
Main
k area, whichd the assessport.
ort – Second
n root Cause
h is consideresment of the a
d Edition
ed as a threatassociated ris
ATC/Creadb
Crew
ATC h
ATC C
Wron
t to aviation ssks will be in
Crew hearbackback
readback
hearback
Confusion/Mix
ng ATC Instruct
safety and ncluded in
k
up
tion
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 23 -
2.2.4 MID Region Safety Performance - Safety Indicators (Proactive)
Safety Indicator Safety Target MID Remark Number of States with an EI score less than 60% for more than 2 areas (LEG, ORG, PEL, OPS, AIR, AIG, ANS and AGA)
Max 3 States with an EI score less than 60% for more than 2 areas and an overall EI over 60%, by the end of 2015
6 States
6 States with an EI <60% for more than 2 areas 1 State with an EI <60% for 2 areas 2 States with an EI <60% for 1 area 4 States with an EI >60% for all areas 8 States have an EI <60% for ANS
Number of States with an overall EI over 60%
All the 15 MID States to have at least 60% EI by the end of 2016
10 States
Number of Significant Safety Concerns
No significant Safety Concern by end of 2016
1
Number of certified international aerodrome as a percentage of all international aerodromes
50% of the international aerodromes certified by the end of 2015; and 80% of the international aerodromes certified by the end of 2016
41%
(28 of 68)
Use of the IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA), to complement safety oversight activities
Maintain at least 60% of the MID airlines to be certified IATA-IOSA by the end of 2015 at all times; and All MID States to accept the IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) as an acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) by 2015 to complement their safety oversight activities.
Number of Ground Handling service providers in the MID Region having the IATA Safety Audit for Ground Operations (ISAGO) certification, as a percentage of all Ground Handling service providers
50% of the Ground Handling service providers to be certified IATA-ISAGO by the end of 2015 All Ground Handling service providers to be certified IATA-ISAGO by the end of 2017 The IATA Ground Handling Manual (IGOM) endorsed as a reference for ground handling safety standards by all MID States by end of 2015
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 24 -
2.3 Predictive Safety Information
Until the end of 2012, the Middle East Region did not fully develop mechanisms for gathering and processing predictive safety information at regional level. However, initiatives have been undertaken to advance capabilities to gather and analyze predictive safety information within the framework of the MID- Safety Support Team (MID-SST). A Safety Management Workshop was held in Oman on 11-12 June 2013. The purpose of the Safety Management Workshop was to promote the RASG-MID and in particular its SST activities related to safety management and stimulate a dynamic exchange of knowledge and experience on the development and effective implementation of SSP/SMS with an emphasis on the need to improve the reporting and sharing of safety data at national and regional level.
Under this section of the report, the aim is to collect and analyse safety data to proactively identify safety concerns before accidents or incidents occur, to develop timely mitigation and prevention measures.
2.3.1 FDM Trends and FOQA Data 2.3.1.1 FDX data
One good source for predictive data is airline operators’ Flight Data Monitoring systems (FDM) and Flight Operations Quality Assurance Programmes (FOQA). To assist in the access of such data, IATA has established the Flight Data Exchange (FDX) database. Flight Data eXchange (FDX) is an aggregated de-identified database of FDA/ FOQA type events that allows the user to identify commercial flight safety issues for a wide variety of safety topics, for many types of aircraft, across a global database; as well as allows flight operations and safety departments to proactively identify safety hazards.
Due to low participation of MENA airlines in the FDX database, the following chart was developed based on FDX data related to AFI and MENA participating airlines. Future editions of the Annual Safety Report would include more representative charts of the Middle East.
-2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0Excessive Vertical Acceleration in Flight - Low
Stick ShakerLow Speed on Approach (Below 500 ft)
GPWS - Too Low FlapTake-Off Configuration Warning - Spoilers
GPWS - Too Low TerrainExcessive Vertical Acceleration in Flight - High
Take-Off Configuration Warning - No ModeLate Flap Configuration (Below 500 ft)
GPWS - GlideslopeExcessive Localizer Deviation (1000 - 500)
Excessive Glideslope Deviation - Above (Below 500 ft)Excessive Glideslope Deviation - Above (1000 - 500)
High Speed on Approach (1000 - 500)Low Power on Approach (Below 500 ft)
Event Rate (Events per 100 Flights)
Event Rates Per Event Definitions
2.3.2 H 2.3.2.1 S
TprAprst E Tfo
Hazard Identif
tate Safety P
he MID-ASRrogrammes.
Annual Safetyrogrammes atrategies.
vents Captu
he most freqollowing chart
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
MID Reg
fication and
Programme (
RT will collecFor this repo
y Report wouand would pr
red by the U
uent incidentsts:
gion Annual
Risk Assess
(SSP)
ct events froort, only one uld include movide predict
UAE
s (Top 10) ca
Safety Repo
- 25 -
sment
m States baState report
more in-depthtive trends an
aptured by th
2010
ort – Second
ased on datated their eveh analysis onalysis to de
he SSP during
d Edition
a captured wnts. The upc
of safety collevelop necess
g the last 3 y
within local Scoming editioected from Ssary risk man
years are sho
Number
SSP/SMS ns of the SSP/SMS nagement
own in the
020406080
100120140
020406080
100120140160180
MID Reg
gion Annual Safety Repo
- 26 -
2011
2012
ort – Secondd Edition
Number
Number
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 27 -
3. Final Conclusions
In regard to Reactive Safety Information, the data analyzed for the MID Region demonstrated that Runway and Ground Safety (RGS), Loss of Control In-flight (LOC-I) and Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) represent the three (3) Focus Areas (Fas). In term of fatality, LOC-I continues to be the top fatal accident category for the 2008 - 2012 period.
Although In-Flight Damage (IFD) is no longer considered as one of the main risk areas according to the matrix of identification and prioritization of the main FAs, it will be addressed under the Emerging Risks Area.
The top contributing factors identified in the analysis include:
1- Safety Management 2- Aircraft Malfunction 3- Maintenance Events 4- SOP Adherence / SOP Cross-verification 5- Unstable Approaches 6- Log/floated/bounced/firm/off-centre/crabbed land 7- Monitor/cross check 8- Overall crew performance
Proactive safety information shows that the Average Overall EI of the audited States (13 States) in the MID Region is 69.85%, which is above the World Average 61.70 %, and that 10 States are with an overall EI over 60%. Areas of PEL, OPS and AIR still show the highest EI in the MID Region. Effort should be made to improve States’ safety oversight capabilities in the area of ANS and Aerodromes as well as the AIG capabilities.
All accident rate in the MID Region was above the World accident rate by an average of 3.86; whereas, all MID accident rate among non-IOSA registered operators was above the World accident rate by an average of 6.23.
The major incidents categories for the MID Region based on reports received directly from airlines are:
1. Laser Attacks 2. Communication and Navigation 3. Air Traffic Management 4. Airside Infrastructure
Mechanisms for gathering and processing predictive safety information at regional level should be developed in order to collect and analyse safety data to proactively identify safety concerns before accidents and/or incidents occur, to develop timely mitigation and prevention measures.
MID-ASRT will be working on collection and analysis of Predictive Safety Data within 2014, to drive safety activities under RASG-MID.
The RASG-MID Annual Safety Report is a timely, unbiased and transparent source of safety related information essential for all aviation stakeholders interested in having a tool to enable sound decision-making on safety related matters.
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 28 -
List of Acronyms ANSP Air Navigation Service Provider ATC Air Traffic Control ATS Air Traffic Services ASRT Annual Safety Report Team CFIT Controlled flight into terrain FDA Flight Data Analysis FOQA Flight Operations Quality Assurance DIP Detailed Implementation Plan GASP ICAO Global Aviation Safety Plan IATA International Air Transport Association ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization LOC-I Loss of control - inflight MID Middle East region (ICAO region) MENA Middle East & North Africa (IATA region) RAST Regional Aviation Safety Group RE Runway excursion(departure or landing) RI Runway Incursion SEI Safety Enhancement Initiative SMS Safety Management System SOP Standard Operating Procedure SSP State Safety Programme UAS Undesirable Aircraft State USOAP Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme
MID Region Annual Safety Report – Second Edition
- 29 -
CREDITS
RASG-MID thanks all those who contributed to the elaboration of this RASG-MID Annual Safety Report
and provided necessary support and information to the members of the MID Annual Safety Report Team (MID-ASRT). Special thanks go to:
Ms. Ruby Sayyed
International Air Transport Association (IATA)
Mr. Mohamed Smaoui and Mr. Mashhor Alblowi International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
-oOo-