Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

12
Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University

Transcript of Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

Page 1: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

Microseismic Data Exchange Standards

Stewart A. LevinStanford University

Page 2: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

And the whole earth was of onelanguage and of one speech.

Genesis 11:1Genesis 11:1The Tower of BabelThe Tower of Babel

Page 3: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.
Page 4: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

What do we want?

• Unambiguous meanings

• Flexibility

• Comprehensive scope

• Efficiency

• Simple decoding

• Leverage existing standards (NIH)

• Protected by and protection from IP issues

Page 5: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

Acceptance of SEG Standards

SEG-D

SEG SPS

SEG-Y

SEG ADS

SEG RODESEG RODE

SEG Polarity

Digital RecordersDigital Recorders

Marine Energy SourcesMarine Energy Sources

Marine StreamersMarine Streamers

MT/EMAPMT/EMAP

SEG P1,P2,P3

SEG SI Metric

SEG-2SEG-2

SEG A,B,C,EX

- OGP

Page 6: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

SEG-D recap

• Acquisition data transfer and archive

• Four revisions since 1975 release

• Complex decoding– “I’d die first before using SEG-D!”

• Creation limited to approximately 50 manufacturers

Page 7: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

SEG-Y recap

• Most often used for processed seismic delivery

• One revision* since 1975 release

• Simple decoding– 2 & 4 byte integer headers, integer or floating pt

samples

• Used by thousands of companies and institutions

* Undergoing second revision

Page 8: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

SEG RODESEG RODE recap

• API RP66 standard applied to seismic

• Highly flexible– Can bundle all sorts of metadata with traces

• Quite complex– 20+ basic data types– Many bit field manipulations– SEG committee SEG-Y example wrong!

• Used by a small handful of companies

Page 9: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

What do we really want?

(a) Long lifetime

(b) Simple format to read and write

or

(b’) Comprehensive format limited to a few specialists

Page 10: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

Let’s talk microseismic

• Acquisition– Mix of passive and active data– Very long traces– Sensor orientations– Accurate time stamps– Precise locations– Sizeable ancillary data– In field processing, e.g. rotations

• All supported in SEG-D 3.0

Page 11: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

Let’s talk microseismic

• Processing– Input SEG-D– Output is not seismic section

• Is there a need for a new/updated SEG standard?– No: Energistics project underway– Yes: SEG-Y upgrade underway– Maybe: SEG-2 upgrade proposal exists

Page 12: Microseismic Data Exchange Standards Stewart A. Levin Stanford University.

An Invitation

SEG-Y rev 2 needs YOU!