Michigan School

ImprovementFramework

Michigan School

ImprovementFramework

The Vision…The Vision…

•Provide a comprehensive framework based on current research and best practice to serve as a road map to support continuous school improvement.

The Vision…The Vision…

• Requirements:

Develop a framework that is

based on research yet can

be individualized to support

the unique needs of each

school.

The Vision…The Vision…

Provide the educational

community with a

common school

improvement dialogue

and vocabulary.

The Vision…The Vision…

Serve as a conceptual

foundation to guide

our thinking and action

regarding school

improvement.

Our Goal… Our Goal…

•Develop a set of standards through which our work is filtered and/or designed–Professional Development

–Technical Support and Program Development

–Grant Criteria

–Accreditation – Performance Indicators

NCLBTitle 1

OSIEd YES!

External

School Improvement Framework

Coherent Continuous

Improvement

The FrameworkThe Framework

SI Framework StructureSI Framework Structure

Strand – General Area of Focus

Standard - Category of Influence within the Strand

Benchmark - Specific Area of Performance within a Standard

Clarifying Criteria – Examples of the Benchmark statements

Evidence - Hard and/or soft data that provides evidence of Benchmark performance.

The SI FrameworkThe SI Framework

5 Strands

12 Standards

26 Benchmarks

Clarifying Examples

Prioritize

Prioritize

Strand I - TEACHING for LEARNING

Strand II – LEADERSHIP

Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

Strand V - DATA & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

Strand IV – SCHOOL & COMMUNITY RELATIONS

The 5 StrandsThe 5 Strands

Strand II - LEADERSHIP

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP

OPERATIONAL RESOURCE MNGT.

SHARED LEADERSHIP

CURRICULUM

INSTRUCTION

ASSESSMENT

Strand I – TEACHING for LEARNING

Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROF. LEARNING

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

Strand IV - SCHOOL/ COMMUNITY RELATIONS

PARENT/FAMILY INVOLVEMENT

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Strand V - DATA & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

DATA MANAGEMENT

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

The 12 StandardsThe 12 Standards

The BenchmarksThe Benchmarks

Strand 1 – TEACHING for LEARNING

• Curriculum – Written & Aligned

• Curriculum – Communicated

• Instructional Planning

• Instructional Delivery• Assessment Aligned

to Curriculum and Instruction

• Reporting and Use of Data

Strand II – LEADERSHIP

• Educational Program• Instructional Support• Resource Allocation• Operational

Management• School Climate and

Culture• Continuous

Improvement

The BenchmarksThe Benchmarks

Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

• Requirements• Skills,

Knowledge, Dispositions

• Collaboration• Content &

Pedagogy• Alignment

Strand IV - SCHOOL/

COMMUNITY RELATIONS

•Communication with Families/ Community

•Authentic Engagement with Families/ Community

Strand V –

Data and KNOWLEDGE MANAGEME

NT

• Identification & Collection

• Analysis• Accessibility• Reporting• Interpretatio

n & Application

Essential QuestionsEssential Questions

•How should the School How should the School Improvement Framework be Improvement Framework be used?used?

•Will the framework items be Will the framework items be mandatory? mandatory?

• Is this designed to be answered Is this designed to be answered by districts or by schools?by districts or by schools?

• In what ways will the framework In what ways will the framework provide a guide for shaping new provide a guide for shaping new accreditation and accountability accreditation and accountability systems such as Education YES?systems such as Education YES?

-- Replacement of the current Replacement of the current 11 performance Indicators.11 performance Indicators.

Essential QuestionsEssential Questions

Essential QuestionsEssential Questions

•What happens to MI-Plan What happens to MI-Plan when we switch over to this when we switch over to this framework?framework?

•What's the timeline for What's the timeline for implementation?implementation?

Progress ReportProgress Report•Development of tools to support Framework – where are we?– Glossary– Self Assessment Tool– School Improvement Template– Building Level Professional

Development – Evidence examples

Progress ReportProgress Report

•Alignment of Framework and Education YES!– Rubric– Surveys– Existing Data bases – School Improvement Plan– Evaluation of Plan - strategies

Progress ReportProgress Report

•Rubric Development - Rubric Development -

– February 2006 – Draft CompletedFebruary 2006 – Draft Completed

– State Board of Education Information State Board of Education Information Item –Item –

•February 2006 – Conduct Pilot StudyFebruary 2006 – Conduct Pilot Study

– New EdYES! collection New EdYES! collection

•Spring 2007 - tentativeSpring 2007 - tentative

Next StepsNext Steps

•Electronic PortalElectronic Portal– Develop a uniform electronic portal to Develop a uniform electronic portal to

support continuous school improvement, support continuous school improvement, EdYES!, grants, and NCLB.EdYES!, grants, and NCLB.

– Links to other state initiatives Links to other state initiatives

• example – CIMSexample – CIMS

– Links to other school-based initiativesLinks to other school-based initiatives

• Example - NCAExample - NCA

Next StepsNext Steps

•Statewide disseminationStatewide dissemination•April 27, 2006 – April 27, 2006 –

– School Improvement ConferenceSchool Improvement Conference– Framework, Applications, ToolsFramework, Applications, Tools– Bob MarzanoBob Marzano

Next StepsNext Steps

•Statewide dissemination – Statewide dissemination – cont’dcont’d•Fall 2006 – LEA rolloutFall 2006 – LEA rollout•Fall School Improvement Fall School Improvement Conference – Conference –

– Introduce EdYES! components and Introduce EdYES! components and electronic portalelectronic portal

•Spring 2007 – EdYES! data Spring 2007 – EdYES! data collectioncollection

Documents Available OnlineDocuments Available Online

•The Revised School

Improvement Framework

and this PowerPoint are

available online at

www.mi.gov/osi

– Dr. Ed Roeber, Executive DirectorDr. Ed Roeber, Executive DirectorOffice of Educational Assessment and Office of Educational Assessment and

AccountabilityAccountability

Roebere@michigan.govRoebere@michigan.gov

– Dr. Yvonne Caamal Canul, DirectorDr. Yvonne Caamal Canul, DirectorOffice of School ImprovementOffice of School Improvement

Canuly@michigan.govCanuly@michigan.gov

– Linda Forward, SupervisorLinda Forward, SupervisorOffice of School ImprovementOffice of School Improvement

ForwardL@michigan.govForwardL@michigan.gov

Contact InformationContact Information

– Linda Howley, Department AnalystOffice of Educational Assessment and

Accountability

•HowleyL@michigan.gov

– Linda Kent, ConsultantOffice of School Improvement

•KentL2@michigan.gov

Contact Information – cont’d