Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

"Ace it!" Sylvan Learning: Dearborn, Lincoln Park, Livonia, N. CantonProvider Code: 015

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 8 - 600

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility

Contact Information:

Mr. Frank Jacoby5112 Driftwood Dr.Commerce Twp, MI 48382Telephone: 2485355456Email: FKJacoby@aol.com

Fax: 3137248317

Website: www.educate.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

57

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

17.5% 21.1%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+3.5 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

57

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

1.8% 1.8%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

"Ace it!" Sylvan Learning: Dearborn, Lincoln Park, Livonia, N. CantonProvider Code: 015

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--17.5%

5721.1%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-12.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

47.4% 35.1%Comparison

100.0%57

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--1.8%

571.8%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+3.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

3.5% 7.0%Comparison

100.0%57

+3.5

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

"Ace it!" Sylvan Learning: Dearborn, Lincoln Park, Livonia, N. CantonProvider Code: 015

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

--

N/A N/A

--

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%50.0%

51.8%56.3%

61.9%87.5%

81.0%87.5%

64.5%70.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

8

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

"Ace it!" Sylvan Learning: Dearborn, Lincoln Park, Livonia, N. CantonProvider Code: 015

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 15

The following are based on survey results:

No 2010-2011 data provided for this category

35.2% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%42.6%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

¡AVANCEMOS!Provider Code: 213

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 50 - 600

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Ana Ulloa7622 SteadmanDearborn, MI 48126Telephone: 3132690654Email: avancemos2009@gmail.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

178

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

21.9% 25.8%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+3.9 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

188

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

9.0% 7.4%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-1.6 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

¡AVANCEMOS!Provider Code: 213

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--21.9%

17825.8%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+5.1

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

33.3% 38.4%Comparison

77.5%138

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--9.0%

1887.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.4

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

8.9% 5.5%Comparison

77.7%146

+3.9

-1.6

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

¡AVANCEMOS!Provider Code: 213

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

0.0%

Pre-Test

--

--

N/A N/A

--

--

100.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%75.7%

51.8%80.2%

61.9%85.2%

81.0%98.3%

64.5%84.9%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

60 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

¡AVANCEMOS!Provider Code: 213

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 7

The following are based on survey results:

No 2010-2011 data provided for this category

26.5% 40.0%

0.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%13.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

1to1 TutorProvider Code: 212

Subject Areas: Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 350

Classroom: 1 tutor per 0 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Ray Narayan2300 Valley View Lane Suite 623Irving, TX 75062Telephone: 9728127809Email: ray.narayan@yahoo.com

Fax: 9728127808

Website: www.1to1tutor.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

144

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

28.5% 23.6%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.9 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

144

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

6.3% 5.6%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-.7 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

1to1 TutorProvider Code: 212

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--28.5%

14423.6%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+3.8

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

26.4% 30.2%Comparison

73.6%106

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--6.3%

1445.6%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+1.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

10.6% 11.5%Comparison

72.2%104

-4.9

-.7

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

1to1 TutorProvider Code: 212

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

--

N/A N/A

--

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%37.6%

51.8%43.4%

61.9%50.7%

81.0%77.6%

64.5%52.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

76

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

1to1 TutorProvider Code: 212

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 34

The following are based on survey results:

No 2010-2011 data provided for this category

55.9% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%52.9%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AAA RESOURCE LEARNING CENTERSProvider Code: 005

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 3000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Elizabeth Martin17500 Chandler Park DriveDetroit, MI 48224Telephone: 3132585356Email: evangelistelizabeth@yahoo.com

Fax: 3134697087

Website: aaaresourcelearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

25

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

12.0% 12.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

25

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AAA RESOURCE LEARNING CENTERSProvider Code: 005

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--12.0%

2512.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-10.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

20.0% 10.0%Comparison

80.0%20

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

250.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

13.0% 8.7%Comparison

92.0%23

0.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AAA RESOURCE LEARNING CENTERSProvider Code: 005

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

53.3%

Data Not Provided

--

--

N/A N/A

--

--

100.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%40.0%

51.8%20.0%

61.9%40.0%

81.0%60.0%

64.5%40.0%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

5 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AAA RESOURCE LEARNING CENTERSProvider Code: 005

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 8

The following are based on survey results:

No 2010-2011 data provided for this category

19.6% 40.0%

75.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%47.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Abacus In-Home Tutoring, Inc.Provider Code: 275

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Michael O'malley16057 Tampa Palms Blvd., Suite 414Tampa, FL 33647Telephone: 8778886720Email: momalley@abacusinhometutoring.com

Fax: 8502547067

Website: www.abacusinhometutoring.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Abacus In-Home Tutoring, Inc.Provider Code: 275

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Abacus In-Home Tutoring, Inc.Provider Code: 275

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Abacus In-Home Tutoring, Inc.Provider Code: 275

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ABC SolutionsProvider Code: 276

Subject Areas: English

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Janetta Hubbard1035 Woods LaneGrosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236Telephone: 3135062158Email: abctherapysolutions@yahoo.com

Fax: 2487927535

Website: abctherapysolutions.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ABC SolutionsProvider Code: 276

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ABC SolutionsProvider Code: 276

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ABC SolutionsProvider Code: 276

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Achievement Tutoring Services, LLCProvider Code: 009

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. S. Adrianne FletcherP.o. Box 39939Redford, MI 48239Telephone: 7343300358Email: aatutoring@aol.com

Fax: 7347698727

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

6

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

33.3% 33.3%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

6

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

16.7% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-16.7 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Achievement Tutoring Services, LLCProvider Code: 009

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--33.3%

633.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+40.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

40.0% 80.0%Comparison

83.3%5

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--16.7%

60.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

66.7%4

0.0

-16.7

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Achievement Tutoring Services, LLCProvider Code: 009

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%81.8%

51.8%39.5%

61.9%45.5%

81.0%63.6%

64.5%57.6%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

11

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Achievement Tutoring Services, LLCProvider Code: 009

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 15

The following are based on survey results:

34.3% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%42.1%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Aerobics, LLCProvider Code: 234

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 25 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online,

Contact Information:

Ms. Daveda ColbertP. O. Box 20393Ferndale, MI 48220Telephone: 3139951961Email: academicaerobics@sbcglobal.net

Fax: 2485455895

Website: www.academicaerobics.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

27

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

29.6% 25.9%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.7 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

27

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

33.3% 3.7%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-29.6 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Aerobics, LLCProvider Code: 234

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--29.6%

2725.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+4.8

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

23.8% 28.6%Comparison

77.8%21

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--33.3%

273.7%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-5.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

10.0% 5.0%Comparison

74.1%20

-3.7

-29.6

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Aerobics, LLCProvider Code: 234

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Aerobics, LLCProvider Code: 234

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 27

The following are based on survey results:

73.5% 40.0%

86.7% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%80.1%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Alliance LLCProvider Code: 235

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Mr. Darius JohnsonP.o. Box 241422Detroit, MI 48224Telephone: 3133320403Email: academicalliance@aol.com

Fax: 3133320403

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Alliance LLCProvider Code: 235

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Alliance LLCProvider Code: 235

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Alliance LLCProvider Code: 235

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Tutoring / McCully'sProvider Code: 124

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 1500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Mr. William Mccully7664 N Canton Center RoadCanton, MI 48187Telephone: 7344147884Email: bmccully@merctutoring.com

Fax: 7344552455

Website: www.merctutoring.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

66

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

40.9% 33.3%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.6 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

68

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

13.2% 10.3%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.9 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Tutoring / McCully'sProvider Code: 124

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--40.9%

6633.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+1.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

36.9% 38.5%Comparison

98.5%65

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--13.2%

6810.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.8

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

23.4% 15.6%Comparison

94.1%64

-7.6

-2.9

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Tutoring / McCully'sProvider Code: 124

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

76.4%

Data Not Provided

--

-- --

--

76.4%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%78.7%

51.8%48.0%

61.9%56.8%

81.0%81.6%

64.5%66.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

38 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Tutoring / McCully'sProvider Code: 124

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 55

The following are based on survey results:

36.4% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%43.2%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Tutoring / On LineProvider Code: 236

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Bill Mccully7664 N. Canton Center Road Canton, Mi 48187Plymouth, MI 48187Telephone: 7344147884Email: bmccully@merctutoring.com

Fax: 7344552455

Website: www.merctutoring.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Tutoring / On LineProvider Code: 236

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Tutoring / On LineProvider Code: 236

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Academic Tutoring / On LineProvider Code: 236

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ACCESS Educational ServicesProvider Code: 012

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 5 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Anisa Sahoubah2651 Saulino CourtDearborn, MI 48120Telephone: 3138426761Email: asahoubah@accesscommunity.org

Fax: 3135510226

Website: www.accesscommunity.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

14

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

28.6% 21.4%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.1 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

14

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

7.1% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.1 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ACCESS Educational ServicesProvider Code: 012

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--28.6%

1421.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.1

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

42.9% 35.7%Comparison

100.0%14

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--7.1%

140.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

71.4%10

-7.1

-7.1

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ACCESS Educational ServicesProvider Code: 012

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

100.0%

edperformance

--

-- --

--

100.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%100.0%

51.8%100.0%

61.9%100.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%100.0%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

1 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ACCESS Educational ServicesProvider Code: 012

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 5

The following are based on survey results:

51.4% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%50.7%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 DataAce it! powered by Sylvan Learning of West Michigan

Provider Code: 226

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Hillary Malone3910 Burton St. Se Suite 101Grand Rapids, MI 49546Telephone: 6169406094Email: Hillary.Malone@SylvanWestMichigan.com

Fax: 6169406214

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 DataAce it! powered by Sylvan Learning of West Michigan

Provider Code: 226

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 DataAce it! powered by Sylvan Learning of West Michigan

Provider Code: 226

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 DataAce it! powered by Sylvan Learning of West Michigan

Provider Code: 226

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Ace your ExamsProvider Code: 274

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 100

Classroom: 1 tutor per 1 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 1 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Student’s Home, Online

Contact Information:

Mr. Patrick Roy2637 E Atlantic Blvd #20686Pompano Beach, FL 33062Telephone: 8005051859Email: aceurexams@gmail.com

Fax: 8667210727

Website: N/A

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Ace your ExamsProvider Code: 274

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Ace your ExamsProvider Code: 274

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Ace your ExamsProvider Code: 274

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieve HighPointsProvider Code: 237

Subject Areas: Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Devina Singh3505 Duluth Park Lane Suite 210Duluth, GA 30096Telephone: 7706236969Email: sesmi@achieveses.com

Fax: 7702329463

Website: www.achieveses.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

37

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

32.4% 29.7%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.7 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

36

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieve HighPointsProvider Code: 237

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--32.4%

3729.7%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+10.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

27.6% 37.9%Comparison

78.4%29

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

360.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.1

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

7.1% 0.0%Comparison

77.8%28

-2.7

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieve HighPointsProvider Code: 237

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

HighPoints Assessment Tool

--

-- --

--

93.8%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%59.3%

51.8%46.4%

61.9%57.1%

81.0%64.3%

64.5%56.8%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

14 883

N/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieve HighPointsProvider Code: 237

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 14

The following are based on survey results:

42.9% 40.0%

56.3% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%49.6%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieving 180,LLCProvider Code: 238

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Samara Starkey20187 CanterburyDetroit, MI 48221Telephone: 3134923825Email: samarastarkey@yahoo.com

Fax: 8324426626

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

35

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

28.6% 25.7%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.9 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

35

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

11.4% 8.6%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.9 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieving 180,LLCProvider Code: 238

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--28.6%

3525.7%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--11.4%

358.6%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

-2.9

-2.9

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieving 180,LLCProvider Code: 238

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%66.7%

51.8%50.0%

61.9%66.7%

81.0%50.0%

64.5%58.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

6

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieving 180,LLCProvider Code: 238

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 26

The following are based on survey results:

32.4% 40.0%

58.6% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%45.5%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieving Maximum Potential, LLC (AMP)Provider Code: 211

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 5 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Mr. Vencie Jackson16200 W. Seven Mile RoadDetroit, MI 48235Telephone: 3138353900Email: vjackson@evoaccounting.com

Fax: 3138357982

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

160

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

17.5% 20.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+2.5 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

159

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

3.1% 3.1%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieving Maximum Potential, LLC (AMP)Provider Code: 211

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--17.5%

16020.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+5.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

26.6% 31.7%Comparison

86.9%139

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--3.1%

1593.1%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.2

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

5.0% 2.9%Comparison

87.4%139

+2.5

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieving Maximum Potential, LLC (AMP)Provider Code: 211

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

Data Not Provided

--

-- --

--

33.3%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%73.3%

51.8%58.7%

61.9%78.3%

81.0%82.6%

64.5%73.2%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

22 883

N/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Achieving Maximum Potential, LLC (AMP)Provider Code: 211

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 65

The following are based on survey results:

56.3% 40.0%

77.6% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%66.9%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Advanced Tutoring by the Ministry and Community CenterProvider Code: 239

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center

Contact Information:

Ms. Stephanie Jones2096 S. Center RoadBurton, MI 48519Telephone: 8107444484Email: lhendrix@emich.edu

Fax: 8107443482

Website: http://www.ministrycommunitycenter.org/services/a

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

7

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

28.6% 14.3%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-14.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

7

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Advanced Tutoring by the Ministry and Community CenterProvider Code: 239

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--28.6%

714.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

14.3% 14.3%Comparison

100.0%7

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

70.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%7

-14.3

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Advanced Tutoring by the Ministry and Community CenterProvider Code: 239

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%91.7%

51.8%29.2%

61.9%33.3%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%63.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

6

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Advanced Tutoring by the Ministry and Community CenterProvider Code: 239

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 2

The following are based on survey results:

21.4% 40.0%

0.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%10.7%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

After School AdvantageProvider Code: 277

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 120

Classroom: 1 tutor per 1 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Harriett Murray1001 Trevor PlaceDetroit, MI 48207Telephone: 3138508887Email: afterschooladvantage@gmail.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

After School AdvantageProvider Code: 277

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

After School AdvantageProvider Code: 277

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

After School AdvantageProvider Code: 277

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Afterschool Learning ProgramProvider Code: 287

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Lakeisha Conley1521 E. Eight Mile Rd.Ferndale, MI 48220Telephone: 2485431313Email: lakeishaconley@yahoo.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Afterschool Learning ProgramProvider Code: 287

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Afterschool Learning ProgramProvider Code: 287

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Afterschool Learning ProgramProvider Code: 287

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Alkebu-lan Village Tutorial ProgramProvider Code: 018

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 60 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Cynthia Williams-lanier7701 Harper Ave.Detroit, MI 48213Telephone: 3139211616Email: cwmslanier@yahoo.com

Fax: 3139211151

Website: alkebulanvillage.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

1

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

1

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Alkebu-lan Village Tutorial ProgramProvider Code: 018

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

10.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-100.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

100.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%1

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

10.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%1

0.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Alkebu-lan Village Tutorial ProgramProvider Code: 018

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

0.0%

WRAT 3

--

-- --

--

0.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%0.0%

51.8%25.0%

61.9%0.0%

81.0%0.0%

64.5%6.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

1 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Alkebu-lan Village Tutorial ProgramProvider Code: 018

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 5

The following are based on survey results:

34.3% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%42.1%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

American Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 022

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 15 - 1200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Mr. Frank Tyndell220 N CenterRoyal Oak, MI 48067Telephone: 2482914686Email: ftyndell@atstutoring.com

Fax: 3138861122

Website: www.atstutoring.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

32

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

25.0% 31.3%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+6.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

31

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

3.2% 3.2%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

American Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 022

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--25.0%

3231.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.2

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

38.7% 35.5%Comparison

96.9%31

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--3.2%

313.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+7.1

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

7.1% 14.3%Comparison

90.3%28

+6.3

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

American Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 022

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

American Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 022

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 2

The following are based on survey results:

0.0% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%25.0%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Astute Scholars, LLCProvider Code: 279

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online,

Contact Information:

Ms. Jeanette Colbert29488 Woodward Avenue #418Royal Oak, MI 48073Telephone: 3137595755Email: astutescholars@sbcglobal.net

Fax: 2485488176

Website: www.astutescholars.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Astute Scholars, LLCProvider Code: 279

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Astute Scholars, LLCProvider Code: 279

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Astute Scholars, LLCProvider Code: 279

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ATS Project SuccessProvider Code: 202

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 0 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Renee Weaver-wright20674 Hall Rd.Clinton Township, MI 48038Telephone: 8002972119Email: info@ATSProjectSuccessWorks.com

Fax: 5864659481

Website: www.ATSProjectSuccessWorks.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

16

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

25.0% 37.5%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+12.5 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

16

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

6.3% 6.3%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ATS Project SuccessProvider Code: 202

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--25.0%

1637.5%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+25.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

25.0% 50.0%Comparison

100.0%16

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--6.3%

166.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-6.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

12.5% 6.3%Comparison

100.0%16

+12.5

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ATS Project SuccessProvider Code: 202

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%100.0%

51.8%58.3%

61.9%55.6%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%78.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

9

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ATS Project SuccessProvider Code: 202

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 9

The following are based on survey results:

46.0% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%48.0%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ATS Project Success (High School)Provider Code: 241

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 0 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Renee Weaver-wright20674 Hall Rd.Clinton Township, MI 48038Telephone: 5864659474Email: info@ATSProjectSuccessWorks.com

Fax: 5864659481

Website: www.ATSProjectSuccessWorks.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ATS Project Success (High School)Provider Code: 241

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ATS Project Success (High School)Provider Code: 241

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ATS Project Success (High School)Provider Code: 241

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AVANCEMOS! On-Line Inc.Provider Code: 242

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 50 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Ana M. Ulloa7622 SteadmanDearborn, MI 48126Telephone: 3132690654Email: avancemos2009@gmail.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AVANCEMOS! On-Line Inc.Provider Code: 242

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AVANCEMOS! On-Line Inc.Provider Code: 242

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AVANCEMOS! On-Line Inc.Provider Code: 242

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AWAKE Community Learning CenterProvider Code: 243

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Antonio Enoex9184 HayesDetroit, MI 48213Telephone: 3139897857Email: awakeclc@gmail.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AWAKE Community Learning CenterProvider Code: 243

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AWAKE Community Learning CenterProvider Code: 243

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

AWAKE Community Learning CenterProvider Code: 243

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Beyond The Basics Educational ServicesProvider Code: 031

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Mr. Charles Berry3121 W. McnicholsDetroit, MI 48221Telephone: 3133454050Email: cberry@dvltd.com

Fax: 3133458441

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

10

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

60.0% 50.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-10.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

11

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

36.4% 18.2%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-18.2 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Beyond The Basics Educational ServicesProvider Code: 031

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--60.0%

1050.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-20.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

50.0% 30.0%Comparison

100.0%10

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--36.4%

1118.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-27.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

36.4% 9.1%Comparison

100.0%11

-10.0

-18.2

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Beyond The Basics Educational ServicesProvider Code: 031

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Beyond The Basics Educational ServicesProvider Code: 031

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 1

The following are based on survey results:

100.0% 40.0%

0.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%50.0%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Brain HurricaneProvider Code: 033

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 2000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Paige Woolery1 East Erie St. Suite 480Chicago, IL 60611Telephone: 7738581267Email: paige@brainhurricane.com

Fax: 8883931080

Website: www.brainhurricane.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Brain HurricaneProvider Code: 033

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Brain HurricaneProvider Code: 033

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Brain HurricaneProvider Code: 033

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

C&B Tutoring, LLCProvider Code: 036

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 25 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Mignon Footman10576 SomersetDetroit, MI 48224Telephone: 3133998938Email: MFOOTMAN@ATT.NET

Fax: 3138854358

Website: www.cbtutoring.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

42

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

21.4% 19.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.4 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

42

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

2.4% 2.4%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

C&B Tutoring, LLCProvider Code: 036

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--21.4%

4219.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-12.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

56.3% 43.8%Comparison

38.1%16

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--2.4%

422.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-12.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

12.5% 0.0%Comparison

38.1%16

-2.4

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

C&B Tutoring, LLCProvider Code: 036

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%56.3%

51.8%68.8%

61.9%50.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%68.8%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

8

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

C&B Tutoring, LLCProvider Code: 036

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 10

The following are based on survey results:

5.7% 40.0%

55.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%30.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Carter, Reddy & Associates, Inc.Provider Code: 038

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 2500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Raahul Reddy24123 Greenfield Rd., Ste. 307Southfield, MI 48075Telephone: 2482336370Email: raahulr@hotmail.com

Fax: 2482336173

Website: www.crandassociates.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

28

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

32.1% 21.4%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-10.7 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

29

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

20.7% 6.9%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-13.8 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Carter, Reddy & Associates, Inc.Provider Code: 038

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--32.1%

2821.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+4.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

12.0% 16.0%Comparison

89.3%25

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--20.7%

296.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

11.1% 11.1%Comparison

62.1%18

-10.7

-13.8

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Carter, Reddy & Associates, Inc.Provider Code: 038

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

45.7%

Brigance

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%52.9%

51.8%58.3%

61.9%66.7%

81.0%77.8%

64.5%63.9%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

8 883

N/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Carter, Reddy & Associates, Inc.Provider Code: 038

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 7

The following are based on survey results:

14.3% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%32.1%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Catapult LearningProvider Code: 215

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 300 - 10000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Lyn MccullenTwo Aquarium Drive, Suite 100Camden, NJ 8103Telephone: 8568317751Email: lyn.mccullen@catapultlearning.com

Fax: 8568317886

Website: www.catapultlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Catapult LearningProvider Code: 215

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Catapult LearningProvider Code: 215

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Catapult LearningProvider Code: 215

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

City CampProvider Code: 244

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Sonya Grant1131 W. Warren, Suite 105Detroit, MI 48207Telephone: 3133307238Email: director@detroitsummercamp.com

Fax:

Website: www.detroitsummercamp.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

City CampProvider Code: 244

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

City CampProvider Code: 244

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

City CampProvider Code: 244

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CKLProvider Code: 217

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 50 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Mr. Clifford Brazier8100 Oak Lane Suite 404Miami Lakes, FL 33016Telephone: 8009590255Email: cbrazier@coolkidslearn.com

Fax: 8668922665

Website: www.coolkidslearn.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CKLProvider Code: 217

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CKLProvider Code: 217

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CKLProvider Code: 217

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Class Act Education and MusicProvider Code: 281

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Francine Duncan-martin19015 Elsmere AveEastpointe, MI 48021Telephone: 3136571993Email: fdm@classactes.com

Fax: 2484944451

Website: under construction

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Class Act Education and MusicProvider Code: 281

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Class Act Education and MusicProvider Code: 281

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Class Act Education and MusicProvider Code: 281

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CLASS ACT EDUCATIONAL ATHLETIC (EA) SPORTS PROGRAMProvider Code: 282

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Francine Duncan-martin25240 Lahser, Suite 1Southfield, MI 48033Telephone: Email: fdm@classactes.com

Fax: 2484944451

Website: under construction

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CLASS ACT EDUCATIONAL ATHLETIC (EA) SPORTS PROGRAMProvider Code: 282

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CLASS ACT EDUCATIONAL ATHLETIC (EA) SPORTS PROGRAMProvider Code: 282

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CLASS ACT EDUCATIONAL ATHLETIC (EA) SPORTS PROGRAMProvider Code: 282

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Class Act Tutoring and Educational Services, LLCProvider Code: 053

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Francine Duncan-martin25240 Lahser, Suite 1Southfield, MI 48033Telephone: 3136571993Email: fdm@classactes.com

Fax: 2484944451

Website: www.ClassActEs.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

88

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

30.7% 28.4%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

88

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

4.5% 3.4%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-1.1 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Class Act Tutoring and Educational Services, LLCProvider Code: 053

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--30.7%

8828.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+5.2

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

23.4% 28.6%Comparison

87.5%77

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--4.5%

883.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.6

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

5.2% 2.6%Comparison

87.5%77

-2.3

-1.1

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Class Act Tutoring and Educational Services, LLCProvider Code: 053

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%78.8%

51.8%58.7%

61.9%69.2%

81.0%84.6%

64.5%72.8%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

26

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Class Act Tutoring and Educational Services, LLCProvider Code: 053

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 20

The following are based on survey results:

37.1% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%43.6%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Club Z! In-Home Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 216

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 3 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Cari Diaz15310 Amberly Drive, Suite #110Tampa, FL 33647Telephone: 8884342582Email: ses@clubztutoring.com

Fax: 8135490185

Website: www.clubztutoring.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

33.3% 66.7%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+33.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

33.3% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-33.3 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Club Z! In-Home Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 216

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--33.3%

366.7%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

66.7% 66.7%Comparison

100.0%3

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--33.3%

30.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%3

+33.3

-33.3

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Club Z! In-Home Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 216

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Club Z! In-Home Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 216

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 0

The following are based on survey results:

40.0%

63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

32.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

N/A

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

College Nannies & TutorsProvider Code: 245

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 25

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 3 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 3 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Sharon Ragland-keys3907 Jackson RoadAnn Arbor, MI 48103Telephone: 7347618393Email: sragland_keys@collegetutors.com

Fax: 7347618395

Website: www.collegetutors.com/annarbormi

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

College Nannies & TutorsProvider Code: 245

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

College Nannies & TutorsProvider Code: 245

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

College Nannies & TutorsProvider Code: 245

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CTBC Educational CenterProvider Code: 246

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 5 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Rosemary Myatt10628 Plymouth Rd.Detroit, MI 48204Telephone: 3139344340Email: myattoverflow@aol.com

Fax: 3139343838

Website: www.ctbc.us

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

5

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

20.0% 20.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

5

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 20.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+20.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CTBC Educational CenterProvider Code: 246

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--20.0%

520.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-20.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

40.0% 20.0%Comparison

100.0%5

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

520.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%5

0.0

+20.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CTBC Educational CenterProvider Code: 246

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%62.5%

51.8%25.0%

61.9%60.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%61.9%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

5

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

CTBC Educational CenterProvider Code: 246

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 1

The following are based on survey results:

85.7% 40.0%

100.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%92.9%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Developing Math Concepts LLCProvider Code: 051

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 800

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 12 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Dyron Mccoy18966 AppolineDetroit, MI 48235Telephone: 2482599900Email: dmcconsulting@sbcglobal.net

Fax: 3133458091

Website: developingmathconcepts.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

6

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

83.3% 50.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-33.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

6

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

50.0% 33.3%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-16.7 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Developing Math Concepts LLCProvider Code: 051

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--83.3%

650.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-16.7

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

50.0% 33.3%Comparison

100.0%6

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--50.0%

633.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-16.7

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

33.3% 16.7%Comparison

100.0%6

-33.3

-16.7

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Developing Math Concepts LLCProvider Code: 051

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Developing Math Concepts LLCProvider Code: 051

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 0

The following are based on survey results:

40.0%

63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

32.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

N/A

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Educate OnlineProvider Code: 039

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 1500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 0 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 3 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 3 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Angela Belt1001 Fleet Street, 8th FloorBaltimore, MD 21202Telephone: 4108432672Email: state@educate-online.com

Fax: 4108432629

Website: http://www.educate-online.com/#/our_programs/sup

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

11

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

54.5% 45.5%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-9.1 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

11

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Educate OnlineProvider Code: 039

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--54.5%

1145.5%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-10.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

40.0% 30.0%Comparison

90.9%10

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

110.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

90.9%10

-9.1

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Educate OnlineProvider Code: 039

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

Data Not Provided

--

-- --

--

50.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%30.0%

51.8%50.0%

61.9%60.0%

81.0%80.0%

64.5%55.0%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

5 883

N/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Educate OnlineProvider Code: 039

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 11

The following are based on survey results:

41.6% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%45.8%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education AccelerationProvider Code: 284

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 3 - 30

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Mr. Elliot Meaux18859 AddisonSouthfield, MI 48075Telephone: 2485577971Email: EdAccel09@gmail.com

Fax: 2485577971

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education AccelerationProvider Code: 284

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education AccelerationProvider Code: 284

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education AccelerationProvider Code: 284

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education Advantage!, LLCProvider Code: 247

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Mr. Antwan Oliver233 Commercial Blvd, 2nd FloorLauderdale By The Sea, FL 33308Telephone: 8776632023Email: info@EducationA.org

Fax: 8776617095

Website: www.EducationA.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

87

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

14.9% 11.5%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.4 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

83

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

3.6% 1.2%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.4 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education Advantage!, LLCProvider Code: 247

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--14.9%

8711.5%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-33.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

66.7% 33.3%Comparison

3.4%3

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--3.6%

831.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

2.4%2

-3.4

-2.4

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education Advantage!, LLCProvider Code: 247

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

Afterschool Achievers K-2

--

-- --

--

81.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%58.3%

51.8%37.5%

61.9%33.3%

81.0%66.7%

64.5%49.0%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

6 883

N/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education Advantage!, LLCProvider Code: 247

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 9

The following are based on survey results:

74.6% 40.0%

93.8% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%84.2%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education Empowerment Foundation, Inc.Provider Code: 248

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 250 - 1500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Mr. Bobby Robinson300 Sw 12th Ave, Suite 322a Miami, Fl 33130Miami, FL 33130Telephone: 8889654370Email: bobby@educationempowermentfoundation.org

Fax: 3056449071

Website: www.educationempowermentfoundation.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

156

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

28.8% 34.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+5.1 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

158

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

7.0% 7.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education Empowerment Foundation, Inc.Provider Code: 248

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--28.8%

15634.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+2.2

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

30.9% 33.1%Comparison

89.1%139

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--7.0%

1587.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-6.9

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

14.5% 7.6%Comparison

82.9%131

+5.1

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education Empowerment Foundation, Inc.Provider Code: 248

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

100.0%

Comprehensive Assessment

--

-- --

--

100.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%25.0%

51.8%39.4%

61.9%61.1%

81.0%50.0%

64.5%43.9%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

18 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education Empowerment Foundation, Inc.Provider Code: 248

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 3

The following are based on survey results:

38.1% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%44.0%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education FundamentalsProvider Code: 056

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Constance L. Jackson18498 Birchcrest DriveDetroit, MI 48221Telephone: 3138639197Email: education-fundamentals@live.com

Fax: 3138639991

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

5

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 20.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+20.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

5

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education FundamentalsProvider Code: 056

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

520.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

50.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

+20.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education FundamentalsProvider Code: 056

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Education FundamentalsProvider Code: 056

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 1

The following are based on survey results:

85.7% 40.0%

0.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%42.9%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Educational EscapadesProvider Code: 060

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, Place of Business, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Kristina Peart12724 West Nine MileOak Park, MI 48237Telephone: 3139489223Email: Peart0280@aol.com

Fax: 3133972682

Website: www.myeetutoring.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Educational EscapadesProvider Code: 060

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Educational EscapadesProvider Code: 060

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Educational EscapadesProvider Code: 060

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EdulutionsProvider Code: 061

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Place of Business, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Pamela TaylorPo Box 38272Detroit, MI 48238Telephone: 3134074842Email: pamelaataylor@comcast.net

Fax: 3135572737

Website: www.edulutions.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

76

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

21.1% 27.6%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+6.6 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

76

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

2.6% 2.6%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EdulutionsProvider Code: 061

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--21.1%

7627.6%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+1.7

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

37.3% 39.0%Comparison

77.6%59

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--2.6%

762.6%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

3.6% 3.6%Comparison

72.4%55

+6.6

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EdulutionsProvider Code: 061

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

50.0%

PLATO Achieve Now Pre-Test

--

-- --

--

50.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%88.1%

51.8%54.8%

61.9%66.7%

81.0%81.0%

64.5%72.6%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

21 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EdulutionsProvider Code: 061

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 6

The following are based on survey results:

21.4% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%35.7%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EduTech Cognitive Therapy & Tutorial ServicesProvider Code: 203

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 750

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Mary James4475 West Outer DriveDetroit, MI 48235Telephone: 2482243445Email: edutechcognitive@aol.com

Fax: 3133400086

Website: www.edutech4learning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

46

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

21.7% 30.4%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+8.7 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

47

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

4.3% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.3 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EduTech Cognitive Therapy & Tutorial ServicesProvider Code: 203

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--21.7%

4630.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+2.2

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

35.6% 37.8%Comparison

97.8%45

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--4.3%

470.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

6.8% 2.3%Comparison

93.6%44

+8.7

-4.3

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EduTech Cognitive Therapy & Tutorial ServicesProvider Code: 203

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%100.0%

51.8%70.0%

61.9%100.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%92.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

5

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EduTech Cognitive Therapy & Tutorial ServicesProvider Code: 203

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 15

The following are based on survey results:

51.4% 40.0%

55.6% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%53.5%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EduTech Mobile Learning CenterProvider Code: 200

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 1500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Mary James, M.ed.4475 West Outer DriveDetroit, MI 48235Telephone: 3135951496Email: edutechmobile@aol.com

Fax: 3136381827

Website: www.edutech4learning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

77

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

26.0% 26.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

76

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

3.9% 6.6%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+2.6 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EduTech Mobile Learning CenterProvider Code: 200

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--26.0%

7726.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

30.6% 30.6%Comparison

80.5%62

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--3.9%

766.6%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

15.8% 12.3%Comparison

75.0%57

0.0

+2.6

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EduTech Mobile Learning CenterProvider Code: 200

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%60.5%

51.8%51.3%

61.9%70.6%

81.0%57.9%

64.5%60.1%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

19

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EduTech Mobile Learning CenterProvider Code: 200

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 4

The following are based on survey results:

32.1% 40.0%

0.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%16.1%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Elite Educational Service (formerly formerly H.I.G.H.E.R. Tutorial Services)Provider Code: 253

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Sonja Williams, M.a.Paramount Building, 1501 Broadway, Suite 1200New York, NY 10036Telephone: 8777969337Email: michigan@myeliteeducation.com

Fax: 8557969337

Website: www.myeliteeducation.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Elite Educational Service (formerly formerly H.I.G.H.E.R. Tutorial Services)Provider Code: 253

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Elite Educational Service (formerly formerly H.I.G.H.E.R. Tutorial Services)Provider Code: 253

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Elite Educational Service (formerly formerly H.I.G.H.E.R. Tutorial Services)Provider Code: 253

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ELS Development ServicesProvider Code: 249

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 350

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Kenyetta Walker3400 Russell, # 255Detroit, MI 48207Telephone: 3133553449Email: kenyetta@els-detroit.com

Fax: 3132626186

Website: www.els-detroit.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

12

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

33.3% 25.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-8.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

12

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

8.3% 8.3%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ELS Development ServicesProvider Code: 249

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--33.3%

1225.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

28.6% 28.6%Comparison

58.3%7

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--8.3%

128.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

58.3%7

-8.3

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ELS Development ServicesProvider Code: 249

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

36.8%

ELS Test(B)

--

-- --

--

43.6%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%14.3%

51.8%7.1%

61.9%14.3%

81.0%33.3%

64.5%17.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

7 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ELS Development ServicesProvider Code: 249

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 2

The following are based on survey results:

71.4% 40.0%

0.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%35.7%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Employment & Training Designs, Inc.Provider Code: 285

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 47

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Joy Mason35425 W. Michigan Ave, Suite 3693Wayne, MI 48184Telephone: 7348581587Email: jmason@etdinc.com

Fax: 7347271830

Website: www.etdinc.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Employment & Training Designs, Inc.Provider Code: 285

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Employment & Training Designs, Inc.Provider Code: 285

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Employment & Training Designs, Inc.Provider Code: 285

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Empowerment Learning ServicesProvider Code: 250

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Sue Goodman1516 East Tropicana Avenue, Suite 115Las Vegas, NV 89119Telephone: 7023884357Email: elstutoring@embarqmail.com

Fax: 7023884358

Website: empowermentlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Empowerment Learning ServicesProvider Code: 250

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Empowerment Learning ServicesProvider Code: 250

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Empowerment Learning ServicesProvider Code: 250

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ESRP ComfortZone Tutorial ProgramProvider Code: 066

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 2 - 10

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 6 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Cozette Calvert24705 Lyndon AvenueRedford Twp, MI 48239Telephone: 3139488364Email: calvertcoz@esrpllc.com

Fax: 3135924701

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ESRP ComfortZone Tutorial ProgramProvider Code: 066

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ESRP ComfortZone Tutorial ProgramProvider Code: 066

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

ESRP ComfortZone Tutorial ProgramProvider Code: 066

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EUP Learning Center, Inc.Provider Code: 067

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 2 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 1 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Place of Business, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Susie Schlehuber650 W Easterday AveSault Ste Marie, MI 49783Telephone: 9066326629Email: susie@euplearningcenter.com

Fax:

Website: www.euplearningcenter.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EUP Learning Center, Inc.Provider Code: 067

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EUP Learning Center, Inc.Provider Code: 067

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

EUP Learning Center, Inc.Provider Code: 067

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Exceptional LearningProvider Code: 204

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 400

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 5 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Stacee Smith9450 LouisRedford, MI 48239Telephone: 3133045013Email: nemiahpickens@yahoo.com

Fax: 3139371494

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

2

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 50.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+50.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

2

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Exceptional LearningProvider Code: 204

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

250.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%2

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

20.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%2

+50.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Exceptional LearningProvider Code: 204

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%54.2%

51.8%50.0%

61.9%66.7%

81.0%62.5%

64.5%58.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

24

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Exceptional LearningProvider Code: 204

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 5

The following are based on survey results:

42.9% 40.0%

0.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%21.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Extreme Advantage TutoringProvider Code: 286

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 2 - 75

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language At selecInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Mr. Terrence Walker24265 Pingree Ave.Warren, MI 48089Telephone: 5868831011Email: extremetutors@yahoo.com

Fax: 5865525915

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Extreme Advantage TutoringProvider Code: 286

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Extreme Advantage TutoringProvider Code: 286

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Extreme Advantage TutoringProvider Code: 286

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Flaggs and Associates Educational ServicesProvider Code: 070

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 50 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Mr. Brian Flaggs4156 Old Dominion DriveWest Bloomfield, MI 48323Telephone: 2488775544Email: Brian@flaggsandassociates.com

Fax: 2486818069

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

86

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

18.6% 20.9%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+2.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

82

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

2.4% 1.2%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-1.2 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Flaggs and Associates Educational ServicesProvider Code: 070

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--18.6%

8620.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

22.2% 22.2%Comparison

83.7%72

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--2.4%

821.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+2.4

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

2.4% 4.9%Comparison

100.0%82

+2.3

-1.2

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Flaggs and Associates Educational ServicesProvider Code: 070

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%53.3%

51.8%51.7%

61.9%57.1%

81.0%73.3%

64.5%58.9%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

15

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Flaggs and Associates Educational ServicesProvider Code: 070

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 19

The following are based on survey results:

12.8% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%31.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Flaggs and Associates Online Educational ServicesProvider Code: 251

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 50 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 25 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Brian Flaggs4156 Old Dominion DriveWest Bloomfield, MI 48323Telephone: 2488775544Email: info@flaggsandassociates.com

Fax: 248596

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Flaggs and Associates Online Educational ServicesProvider Code: 251

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Flaggs and Associates Online Educational ServicesProvider Code: 251

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Flaggs and Associates Online Educational ServicesProvider Code: 251

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

FrontRunners OnlineProvider Code: 310

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 150

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Alfreda Bowden31340 E. Stonewood Ct.Farmington Hills, MI 48334Telephone: 3135755202Email: alfreda@frontrunnersnation.com

Fax:

Website: www.frontrunnersnation.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

FrontRunners OnlineProvider Code: 310

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

FrontRunners OnlineProvider Code: 310

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

FrontRunners OnlineProvider Code: 310

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Future FoundationsProvider Code: 205

Subject Areas: English

Number of Students to be served: 50 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Mr. Vincent StewartP.o Box 731Maumee, OH 43537Telephone: 4193496570Email: vstew87@aol.com

Fax: 4197402293

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

242

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

20.7% 22.7%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+2.1 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

240

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

5.8% 3.3%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.5 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Future FoundationsProvider Code: 205

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--20.7%

24222.7%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+1.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

29.0% 30.0%Comparison

85.5%207

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--5.8%

2403.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

4.5% 1.0%Comparison

83.3%200

+2.1

-2.5

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Future FoundationsProvider Code: 205

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

59.4%

Achieve

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%69.4%

51.8%62.1%

61.9%83.9%

81.0%90.3%

64.5%76.4%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

31 883

N/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Future FoundationsProvider Code: 205

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 5

The following are based on survey results:

11.4% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%30.7%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Future LeadersProvider Code: 288

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Dana Greer27435 Southfield Rd.Lathrup Village, MI 48076Telephone: 2484708775Email: drdanag1@gmail.com

Fax: 2485523050

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Future LeadersProvider Code: 288

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Future LeadersProvider Code: 288

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Future LeadersProvider Code: 288

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

GatewayProvider Code: 272

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 400

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Bettie Robinson20010 Kelly RoadHarperwoods, MI 48225Telephone: 3134331911Email: gateway2excellence@yahoo.com

Fax: 3133430496

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

77

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

24.7% 20.8%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.9 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

77

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

6.5% 5.2%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-1.3 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

GatewayProvider Code: 272

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--24.7%

7720.8%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+4.1

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

24.3% 28.4%Comparison

96.1%74

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--6.5%

775.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.1

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

12.3% 8.2%Comparison

94.8%73

-3.9

-1.3

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

GatewayProvider Code: 272

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

58.8%

Brigance Comprehension

--

-- --

--

80.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%42.9%

51.8%42.9%

61.9%57.1%

81.0%85.7%

64.5%57.1%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

7 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

GatewayProvider Code: 272

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 16

The following are based on survey results:

29.5% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%39.7%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Global Learning SolutionsProvider Code: 076

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Kila Heath18701 Grand River, Suite 186Detroit, MI 48223Telephone: 3138357323Email: kilaheath25@comcast.net

Fax: 3138358255

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

32

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

34.4% 15.6%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-18.8 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

33

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

9.1% 6.1%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Global Learning SolutionsProvider Code: 076

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--34.4%

3215.6%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-18.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

29.6% 11.1%Comparison

84.4%27

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--9.1%

336.1%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.7

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

7.4% 3.7%Comparison

81.8%27

-18.8

-3.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Global Learning SolutionsProvider Code: 076

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%75.0%

51.8%48.5%

61.9%44.4%

81.0%88.9%

64.5%64.2%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

8

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Global Learning SolutionsProvider Code: 076

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 6

The following are based on survey results:

21.4% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%35.7%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Globutronic Educational Group, LLCProvider Code: 219

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 800

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Mr. Melvin Hatcher29556 Southfield Rd., Ste. 210Southfield, MI 48076Telephone: 2484249540Email: globutronic@sbcglobal.net

Fax: 2484249542

Website: www.globutronic.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Globutronic Educational Group, LLCProvider Code: 219

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Globutronic Educational Group, LLCProvider Code: 219

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Globutronic Educational Group, LLCProvider Code: 219

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Goodman's PlaceProvider Code: 078

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 5 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Eleanor M. Goodman840 East Ninth StreetFlint, MI 48503Telephone: 8107874757Email: goodgen44@aol.com

Fax: 8107874757

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Goodman's PlaceProvider Code: 078

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Goodman's PlaceProvider Code: 078

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Goodman's PlaceProvider Code: 078

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

GPS Educational ServicesProvider Code: 218

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 100

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 20 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Brian Thompson30177 Northwestern Hwy Suite 104Farmington Hills, MI 48334Telephone: 2482543445Email: brian@globalpsychology.net

Fax: 2482543447

Website: www.globalpsychology.net

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

GPS Educational ServicesProvider Code: 218

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

GPS Educational ServicesProvider Code: 218

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

GPS Educational ServicesProvider Code: 218

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Grade A+Provider Code: 252

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 30 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Talise Reed23205 Gratiot Ave #301Eastpointe, MI 48021Telephone: 5862946510Email: contact@grade-aplus.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

53

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

17.0% 11.3%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-5.7 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

54

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

1.9% 3.7%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+1.9 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Grade A+Provider Code: 252

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--17.0%

5311.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.7

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

26.9% 19.2%Comparison

49.1%26

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--1.9%

543.7%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+7.4

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

3.7% 11.1%Comparison

50.0%27

-5.7

+1.9

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Grade A+Provider Code: 252

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%83.3%

51.8%61.1%

61.9%66.7%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%77.8%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

9

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Grade A+Provider Code: 252

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 10

The following are based on survey results:

32.9% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%41.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Group ExcellenceProvider Code: 290

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 100 - 5000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 0 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 5 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online,

Contact Information:

Mr. Chris Battle7616 Lyndon B Johnson Fwy, Ste 515Dallas, TX 75251Telephone: 8004397803Email: MI@mygex.com

Fax: 8004397803

Website: http://www.groupexcellence.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Group ExcellenceProvider Code: 290

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Group ExcellenceProvider Code: 290

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Group ExcellenceProvider Code: 290

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Growing Scholars Educational CenterProvider Code: 291

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 100

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Anetrise Jones6322 Old Collinsville RoadFairview Heights, IL 62208Telephone: 6186284769Email: info@growingscholarscenter.com

Fax: 6186284772

Website: www.growingscholarscenter.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Growing Scholars Educational CenterProvider Code: 291

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Growing Scholars Educational CenterProvider Code: 291

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Growing Scholars Educational CenterProvider Code: 291

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Heart of West Michigan United WayProvider Code: 292

Subject Areas: English

Number of Students to be served: 100 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 2 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Emily Swart118 Commerce SwGrand Rapids, MI 49503Telephone: 6167528601Email: eswart@hwmuw.org

Fax: 6164598460

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Heart of West Michigan United WayProvider Code: 292

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Heart of West Michigan United WayProvider Code: 292

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Heart of West Michigan United WayProvider Code: 292

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Higher Ground ProgramProvider Code: 084

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 2500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Jackey Wilson8131 E. Outer DriveDetroit, MI 48213Telephone: 3132454191Email: jwil@highergroundprogram.org

Fax: 3132454390

Website: www.highergroundprogram.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

77

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

15.6% 16.9%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+1.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

75

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

1.3% 4.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+2.7 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Higher Ground ProgramProvider Code: 084

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--15.6%

7716.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-5.7

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

37.1% 31.4%Comparison

90.9%70

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--1.3%

754.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

8.8% 5.3%Comparison

76.0%57

+1.3

+2.7

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Higher Ground ProgramProvider Code: 084

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

47.7%

Data Not Provided

--

-- --

--

47.1%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%68.5%

51.8%55.1%

61.9%48.1%

81.0%70.4%

64.5%60.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

27 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Higher Ground ProgramProvider Code: 084

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 21

The following are based on survey results:

42.2% 40.0%

80.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%61.1%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Highest Level of SuccessProvider Code: 293

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 400

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Mr. Jason Trotter2000 Town Center Suite 1900Southfield, MI 48075Telephone: 2489307377Email: trotter.j@hotmail.com

Fax: 2485390826

Website: www.highestlevelofsuccess.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Highest Level of SuccessProvider Code: 293

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Highest Level of SuccessProvider Code: 293

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Highest Level of SuccessProvider Code: 293

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Hope4LearningProvider Code: 089

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. E. WebbP.o. Box 134Sterling Heights, MI 48311Telephone: 3133162358Email: hope4learning@gmail.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Hope4LearningProvider Code: 089

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Hope4LearningProvider Code: 089

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Hope4LearningProvider Code: 089

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

HTC TutoringProvider Code: 206

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 4 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Pamela Dixon19309 MiddlesexSouthfield, MI 48076Telephone: 3134650655Email: pastordixon@holytempleafc.org

Fax: 3134162364

Website: www.holytempleafc.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

18

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

38.9% 27.8%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-11.1 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

18

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

5.6% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-5.6 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

HTC TutoringProvider Code: 206

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--38.9%

1827.8%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-20.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

40.0% 20.0%Comparison

83.3%15

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--5.6%

180.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

6.7% 6.7%Comparison

83.3%15

-11.1

-5.6

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

HTC TutoringProvider Code: 206

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

85.3%

A+ Anywhere

--

-- --

--

82.4%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

HTC TutoringProvider Code: 206

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 6

The following are based on survey results:

47.6% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%48.8%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.Provider Code: 254

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 100 - 600

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Natalie Tortorello496 Kinderkamack RoadOradell, NJ 7649Telephone: 8006928400Email: HuntingtonSES@hlcmail.com

Fax: 8004661831

Website: www.freeschooltutoring.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.Provider Code: 254

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.Provider Code: 254

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.Provider Code: 254

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

iLEARNED Online, LLCProvider Code: 091

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 0 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Haaris Ahmad4153 Monarch Ave.Canton, MI 48188Telephone: 7347863003Email: info@ilearnedonline.com

Fax:

Website: www.ilearnedonline.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

48

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

43.8% 47.9%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+4.2 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

49

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

20.4% 10.2%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-10.2 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

iLEARNED Online, LLCProvider Code: 091

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--43.8%

4847.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-10.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

30.0% 20.0%Comparison

41.7%20

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--20.4%

4910.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-5.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

5.0% 0.0%Comparison

40.8%20

+4.2

-10.2

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

iLEARNED Online, LLCProvider Code: 091

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

83.9%

Assessment Test

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%75.0%

51.8%54.2%

61.9%83.3%

81.0%83.3%

64.5%74.0%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

6 883

N/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

iLEARNED Online, LLCProvider Code: 091

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 0

The following are based on survey results:

40.0%

63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

32.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

N/A

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

IMAGE Personal Success Training InstituteProvider Code: 092

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Mr. Carlos Johnson21500 Northwestern Hwy., Ste. 1105 Northland Mall -- Lower LeSouthfield, MI 48075Telephone: 2485696234Email: info@imageofsuccess.com

Fax: 2485696336

Website: www.imageofsuccess.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

4

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

25.0% 0.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-25.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

4

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

25.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-25.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

IMAGE Personal Success Training InstituteProvider Code: 092

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--25.0%

40.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%4

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--25.0%

40.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-25.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

25.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%4

-25.0

-25.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

IMAGE Personal Success Training InstituteProvider Code: 092

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%83.3%

51.8%20.8%

61.9%50.0%

81.0%83.3%

64.5%59.4%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

6

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

IMAGE Personal Success Training InstituteProvider Code: 092

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 12

The following are based on survey results:

20.2% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%35.1%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Imagine LearningProvider Code: 294

Subject Areas: English

Number of Students to be served: 8 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

LEA Facility

Contact Information:

Mr. Landon Lisonbee191 River Park DriveProvo, UT 84604Telephone: 8017177087Email: landon.lisonbee@imaginelearning.com

Fax: 8008787249

Website: www.imaginelearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Imagine LearningProvider Code: 294

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Imagine LearningProvider Code: 294

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Imagine LearningProvider Code: 294

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Instant Student Academic Achievement CentersProvider Code: 093

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 1500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 15 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Richard Hogan14355 Burt RoadDetroit, MI 48223Telephone: 3135382523Email: hoganinstant@aol.com

Fax: 3135382527

Website: Instant Reading Achievement

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

1

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

1

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Instant Student Academic Achievement CentersProvider Code: 093

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

10.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%1

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

10.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%1

0.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Instant Student Academic Achievement CentersProvider Code: 093

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Instant Student Academic Achievement CentersProvider Code: 093

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 0

The following are based on survey results:

40.0%

63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

32.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

N/A

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Institute for Leadership Development & Career AdvancementProvider Code: 255

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 40 - 60

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Dr. Alma StallworthNorth Campus Park Towers 1001 Woodward Avenue Suite 1110Detroit, MI 48226Telephone: 3132859234Email: founder@michiganblackcaucus.org

Fax: 3132859231

Website: www.detroitpush.org/MBC

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Institute for Leadership Development & Career AdvancementProvider Code: 255

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Institute for Leadership Development & Career AdvancementProvider Code: 255

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Institute for Leadership Development & Career AdvancementProvider Code: 255

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Intelligent Minds TutoringProvider Code: 221

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 115

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Michele Hawkins18311 CherrylawnDetroit, MI 48221Telephone: 3132835082Email: Intelligentmindstutoring@yahoo.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Intelligent Minds TutoringProvider Code: 221

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Intelligent Minds TutoringProvider Code: 221

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Intelligent Minds TutoringProvider Code: 221

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

International After School ProgramProvider Code: 094

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 2500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Darryl Sawyers9200 Gratiot Suite 1Detroit, MI 48213Telephone: 3132136355Email: admin@iasptutor.com

Fax: 3137310222

Website: www.iaspdetroit.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

79

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

15.2% 20.3%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+5.1 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

78

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

2.6% 1.3%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-1.3 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

International After School ProgramProvider Code: 094

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--15.2%

7920.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+5.4

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

19.6% 25.0%Comparison

70.9%56

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--2.6%

781.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+1.8

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

7.1% 8.9%Comparison

71.8%56

+5.1

-1.3

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

International After School ProgramProvider Code: 094

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

97.5%

Study Island and Houghton Mifflin

--

-- --

--

96.9%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%68.0%

51.8%59.8%

61.9%79.6%

81.0%87.8%

64.5%73.8%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

49 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

International After School ProgramProvider Code: 094

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 7

The following are based on survey results:

53.1% 40.0%

83.3% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%68.2%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Ivy League TutorProvider Code: 256

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 100

Classroom: 1 tutor per 0 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 3 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Student’s Home, Via Technology, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Carlos Somarriba15774 S. La Grange Road, #178Orland Park, IL 60462Telephone: 8774489532Email: csomarriba@ivyleaguetutor.net

Fax: 8665758840

Website: www.ivyleaguetutor.net

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

5

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

4

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Ivy League TutorProvider Code: 256

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

50.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

40.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

0.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Ivy League TutorProvider Code: 256

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Ivy League TutorProvider Code: 256

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 2

The following are based on survey results:

42.9% 40.0%

0.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%21.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Jude Family Learning CenterProvider Code: 295

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 100

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Mr. Sylvester Harris Sr.9105 Van DykeDetroit, MI 48213Telephone: 3139259988Email: judembc53@yahoo.com

Fax: 3139258890

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Jude Family Learning CenterProvider Code: 295

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Jude Family Learning CenterProvider Code: 295

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Jude Family Learning CenterProvider Code: 295

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Jumpstart TutorProvider Code: 296

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 50 - 700

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 20 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Erik Turner31408 Harper #209St. Claire Shores, MI 48082Telephone: 5862032119Email: admin@jumpstart-tutoring.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Jumpstart TutorProvider Code: 296

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Jumpstart TutorProvider Code: 296

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Jumpstart TutorProvider Code: 296

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

K-2 Learning Center, LLCProvider Code: 100

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 75

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Jacqueline Logan16952 Mount VernonSouthfield, MI 48075Telephone: 2482250191Email: k2learning@yahoo.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

K-2 Learning Center, LLCProvider Code: 100

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

K-2 Learning Center, LLCProvider Code: 100

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

K-2 Learning Center, LLCProvider Code: 100

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Kenniss AcademicsProvider Code: 257

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 150

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 5 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Carol Marais17200 Mack AvenueGrosse Pointe, MI 48230Telephone: 3138829195Email: carol@kenniss.com

Fax: 3133321483

Website: kenniss.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

25

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

24.0% 20.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

25

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

8.0% 12.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+4.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Kenniss AcademicsProvider Code: 257

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--24.0%

2520.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

36.4% 31.8%Comparison

88.0%22

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--8.0%

2512.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-22.7

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

27.3% 4.5%Comparison

88.0%22

-4.0

+4.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Kenniss AcademicsProvider Code: 257

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

48.6%

Curriculum Associates Placement: Computation

--

-- --

--

37.1%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%83.3%

51.8%25.0%

61.9%66.7%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%68.8%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

3 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Kenniss AcademicsProvider Code: 257

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 13

The following are based on survey results:

37.4% 40.0%

57.1% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%47.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Kidz University Educational Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 223

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 30 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Angela Burgos40 Market StreetPassac, NJ 7055Telephone: 2015231153Email: kidzuniversitynj@aol.com

Fax: 2014581233

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

13

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

38.5% 30.8%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.7 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

13

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Kidz University Educational Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 223

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--38.5%

1330.8%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-8.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

33.3% 25.0%Comparison

92.3%12

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

130.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.7

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

7.7% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%13

-7.7

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Kidz University Educational Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 223

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

75.0%

Data Not Provided

--

-- --

--

83.3%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Kidz University Educational Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 223

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 0

The following are based on survey results:

40.0%

63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

32.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

N/A

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Know 2 Grow Learning, LLCProvider Code: 224

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 25 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Jonathan Robinson5594 Stratford DriveWest Bloomfield, MI 48322Telephone: 8002422690Email: jrobinson@know2growlearning.com

Fax: 2484191817

Website: www.know2growlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Know 2 Grow Learning, LLCProvider Code: 224

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Know 2 Grow Learning, LLCProvider Code: 224

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Know 2 Grow Learning, LLCProvider Code: 224

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Know 2 Grow OnlineProvider Code: 258

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 100

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Jonathan Robinson6689 Orchard Lake Road, #169West Bloomfield, MI 48322Telephone: 8002422690Email: jrobinson@know2growonline.com

Fax: 2484191817

Website: www.know2growonline.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

11

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

9.1% 9.1%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

11

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Know 2 Grow OnlineProvider Code: 258

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--9.1%

119.1%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

20.0% 20.0%Comparison

90.9%10

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

110.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

90.9%10

0.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Know 2 Grow OnlineProvider Code: 258

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

14.3%

Data Not Provided

--

-- --

--

64.3%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%70.0%

51.8%50.0%

61.9%60.0%

81.0%80.0%

64.5%65.0%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

5 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Know 2 Grow OnlineProvider Code: 258

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 11

The following are based on survey results:

29.9% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%39.9%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

KnowledgePoints GrandvilleProvider Code: 214

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 30 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Lee Cook4693 Wilson Avenue Ste HGrandville, MI 49418Telephone: 6165313995Email: lee.cook@knowledgepoints.com

Fax: 6165345163

Website: http://www.knowledgepoints.com/grandville/

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

KnowledgePoints GrandvilleProvider Code: 214

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

KnowledgePoints GrandvilleProvider Code: 214

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

KnowledgePoints GrandvilleProvider Code: 214

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learn It OnlineProvider Code: 259

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 30 - 3000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 0 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 5 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Raquel Whiting2201 Old Court RoadBaltimore, MD 21208Telephone: 4103690000Email: Raquel.Whiting@learnitsystems.com

Fax: 4103690137

Website: www.learnitsystems.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learn It OnlineProvider Code: 259

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learn It OnlineProvider Code: 259

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learn It OnlineProvider Code: 259

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learn It SystemsProvider Code: 225

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 100 - 3000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Raquel Whiting2201 Old Court RoadBaltimore, MD 21208Telephone: 4103690000Email: raquel.whiting@learnitsystems.com

Fax: 4103690137

Website: www.learnitsystems.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learn It SystemsProvider Code: 225

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learn It SystemsProvider Code: 225

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learn It SystemsProvider Code: 225

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning Disabilities ClinicProvider Code: 109

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 1 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Lynne Master, M.ed.25611 CoolidgeOak Park, MI 48237Telephone: 2485456677Email: lynneldc@aol.com

Fax: 2485452152

Website: ldclinic.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

33.3% 0.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-33.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning Disabilities ClinicProvider Code: 109

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--33.3%

30.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-33.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

66.7% 33.3%Comparison

100.0%3

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

30.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-33.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

33.3% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%3

-33.3

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning Disabilities ClinicProvider Code: 109

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%66.7%

51.8%27.1%

61.9%75.0%

81.0%91.7%

64.5%65.1%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

12

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning Disabilities ClinicProvider Code: 109

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 19

The following are based on survey results:

37.6% 40.0%

57.1% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%47.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning LandProvider Code: 222

Subject Areas: English

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 1 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Frankie SmithP.o Box 40874Redford, MI 48240Telephone: 5863503335Email: learningland09@yahoo.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

17

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

23.5% 17.6%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-5.9 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

15

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning LandProvider Code: 222

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--23.5%

1717.6%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

31.3% 31.3%Comparison

94.1%16

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

150.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%15

-5.9

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning LandProvider Code: 222

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

100.0%

Wrat

--

-- --

--

100.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%40.0%

51.8%45.0%

61.9%60.0%

81.0%60.0%

64.5%51.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

5 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning LandProvider Code: 222

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 9

The following are based on survey results:

52.4% 40.0%

66.7% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%59.5%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning SpecialistsProvider Code: 260

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 50 - 325

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Katrenia Flanigan18530 Mack Ave Suite 272Grosse Pointe, MI 48236Telephone: 3136234977Email: katrenia@hotmail.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

10

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

40.0% 30.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-10.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

10

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning SpecialistsProvider Code: 260

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--40.0%

1030.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

11.1% 11.1%Comparison

90.0%9

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

100.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

90.0%9

-10.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning SpecialistsProvider Code: 260

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%75.0%

51.8%58.3%

61.9%50.0%

81.0%83.3%

64.5%66.7%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

6

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Learning SpecialistsProvider Code: 260

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 10

The following are based on survey results:

28.6% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%39.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

M.A.D.E. Training & Consulting, Inc. (Making A Difference Everyday)Provider Code: 118

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 2000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Glynis Thornton17515 West 9 Mile Road Suite 180Southfield, MI 48075Telephone: 3133186687Email: makingadifferenceeveryday@netscape.com

Fax: 2485958056

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

M.A.D.E. Training & Consulting, Inc. (Making A Difference Everyday)Provider Code: 118

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

30.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-33.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

66.7% 33.3%Comparison

100.0%3

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

30.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%3

0.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

M.A.D.E. Training & Consulting, Inc. (Making A Difference Everyday)Provider Code: 118

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

96.3%

Data Not Provided

--

-- --

--

94.3%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%63.3%

51.8%55.0%

61.9%53.3%

81.0%80.0%

64.5%62.9%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

15 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

M.A.D.E. Training & Consulting, Inc. (Making A Difference Everyday)Provider Code: 118

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 6

The following are based on survey results:

35.7% 40.0%

75.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%55.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Making the GradeProvider Code: 208

Subject Areas: English

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 5 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Stacee Smith15801 W. ParkwayDetroit, MI 48223Telephone: 3133045013Email: makingthegradeab@yahoo.com

Fax: 3139371494

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Making the GradeProvider Code: 208

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Making the GradeProvider Code: 208

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Making the GradeProvider Code: 208

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Math and Reading Solutions PlusProvider Code: 300

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 100

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 15 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Bill Nagi3231 AmazonDearborn, MI 48120Telephone: 3138508090Email: mathandreadingsolutionsplus@gmail.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Math and Reading Solutions PlusProvider Code: 300

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Math and Reading Solutions PlusProvider Code: 300

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Math and Reading Solutions PlusProvider Code: 300

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Math Savvy InstituteProvider Code: 121

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 3000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Rhonda Alford18701 Grand River Ave #126Detroit, MI 48223Telephone: 3133303970Email: ralford@mathsavvyinstitute.com

Fax: 3132219513

Website: mathsavvyinstitute.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

175

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

33.7% 26.3%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.4 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

172

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

8.7% 4.7%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.1 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Math Savvy InstituteProvider Code: 121

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--33.7%

17526.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+6.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

23.4% 29.7%Comparison

36.6%64

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--8.7%

1724.7%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+1.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

4.6% 6.2%Comparison

37.8%65

-7.4

-4.1

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Math Savvy InstituteProvider Code: 121

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%90.9%

51.8%31.8%

61.9%54.5%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%69.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

11

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Math Savvy InstituteProvider Code: 121

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 7

The following are based on survey results:

40.8% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%45.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Mathnasium - The Math Learning CenterProvider Code: 261

Subject Areas: Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Kimberly Smith5712 N. Canton Center DriveCanton, MI 48187Telephone: 7344596284Email: plymouthcanton@mathnasium.com

Fax:

Website: www.mathnasium.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Mathnasium - The Math Learning CenterProvider Code: 261

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Mathnasium - The Math Learning CenterProvider Code: 261

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Mathnasium - The Math Learning CenterProvider Code: 261

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

McCall Ed Services OnlineProvider Code: 301

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 15 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online,

Contact Information:

Mr. R MccallP.o. Box 20097Ferndale, MI 48220Telephone: 3137293329Email: rdm@mccalledservices.net

Fax: 3133681622

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

McCall Ed Services OnlineProvider Code: 301

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

McCall Ed Services OnlineProvider Code: 301

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

McCall Ed Services OnlineProvider Code: 301

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

McCall Educational ServicesProvider Code: 123

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 9 - 2000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Mr. R MccallP.o. Box 20097Ferndale, MI 48220Telephone: 3133840842Email: Jbattle89@aol.com

Fax: 3133681622

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

197

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

26.9% 24.4%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.5 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

193

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

3.1% 3.1%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

McCall Educational ServicesProvider Code: 123

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--26.9%

19724.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+3.6

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

28.6% 32.1%Comparison

71.1%140

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--3.1%

1933.1%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

6.7% 6.7%Comparison

69.9%135

-2.5

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

McCall Educational ServicesProvider Code: 123

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%38.1%

51.8%38.6%

61.9%45.5%

81.0%72.7%

64.5%48.7%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

11

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

McCall Educational ServicesProvider Code: 123

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 9

The following are based on survey results:

34.9% 40.0%

66.7% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%50.8%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Metropolitan Certified Teachers Association, LLC (MCTA)Provider Code: 127

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 1500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 10 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Angelika Jones-matthews1245 HardingDetroit, MI 48214Telephone: 3134587798Email: talenteddelta@aol.com & reality2u@aol.com

Fax: 3134587798

Website: www.themcta.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

23

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

21.7% 17.4%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

23

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Metropolitan Certified Teachers Association, LLC (MCTA)Provider Code: 127

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--21.7%

2317.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

28.6% 28.6%Comparison

60.9%14

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

230.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-8.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

8.3% 0.0%Comparison

52.2%12

-4.3

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Metropolitan Certified Teachers Association, LLC (MCTA)Provider Code: 127

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%100.0%

51.8%97.5%

61.9%90.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%96.9%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

10

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Metropolitan Certified Teachers Association, LLC (MCTA)Provider Code: 127

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 13

The following are based on survey results:

69.2% 40.0%

94.4% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%81.8%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

MI Learning Unlimited OnlineProvider Code: 262

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 400

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Carolyn Darden8162 E. Jefferson Unit 7 BDetroit, MI 48214Telephone: 3134926626Email: cstar601@yahoo.com

Fax: 8324426626

Website: learningunlimited.net

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

7

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 14.3%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+14.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

7

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

MI Learning Unlimited OnlineProvider Code: 262

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

714.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+14.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

14.3% 28.6%Comparison

100.0%7

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

70.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

85.7%6

+14.3

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

MI Learning Unlimited OnlineProvider Code: 262

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

MI Learning Unlimited OnlineProvider Code: 262

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 0

The following are based on survey results:

40.0%

63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

32.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

N/A

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

MI Learning Unlimited, LLCProvider Code: 128

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 20 - 3000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Ms. Carolyn Darden8162 E. Jefferson 7aDetroit, MI 48214Telephone: 3134926626Email: milearningunlimited@yahoo.com

Fax: 8324426626

Website: learningunlimited.net

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

40

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

27.5% 25.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.5 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

40

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

2.5% 2.5%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

MI Learning Unlimited, LLCProvider Code: 128

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--27.5%

4025.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

24.0% 20.0%Comparison

62.5%25

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--2.5%

402.5%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

4.0% 0.0%Comparison

62.5%25

-2.5

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

MI Learning Unlimited, LLCProvider Code: 128

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

75.4%

Brigance

--

-- --

--

89.9%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%64.5%

51.8%59.7%

61.9%64.5%

81.0%80.6%

64.5%67.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

31 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

MI Learning Unlimited, LLCProvider Code: 128

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 13

The following are based on survey results:

33.0% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%41.5%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Mobile Minds TutoringProvider Code: 302

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 250

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Charles Purdom12400 Ventura Blvd. Suite #1343Studio City, CA 91604Telephone: 3238420774Email: cpurdom@mobilemindstutoring.com

Fax: 8776742252

Website: www.mobilemindstutoring.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Mobile Minds TutoringProvider Code: 302

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Mobile Minds TutoringProvider Code: 302

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Mobile Minds TutoringProvider Code: 302

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Much Success Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 133

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 3000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Nikesha Griffin20010 Kelly Rd.Harper Woods, MI 48225Telephone: 3136833652Email: muchsuccess@netscape.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Much Success Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 133

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Much Success Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 133

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Much Success Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 133

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

My Teaching Tools, Inc.Provider Code: 263

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 240

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:2, 3, 4, 5

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Sheldon Mcpherson10641 W. Mcnichols Rd., Ste 100Detroit, MI 48221Telephone: 3132474515Email: mt2inc@yahoo.com

Fax: 3139279141

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

My Teaching Tools, Inc.Provider Code: 263

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

My Teaching Tools, Inc.Provider Code: 263

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

My Teaching Tools, Inc.Provider Code: 263

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

New Bethel Empowerment CorporationProvider Code: 314

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 400

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Theresa Sparks8450 LinwoodDetroit, MI 48206Telephone: 3136936005Email: theresa_sparks@msn.com

Fax: 3138942929

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

New Bethel Empowerment CorporationProvider Code: 314

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

New Bethel Empowerment CorporationProvider Code: 314

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

New Bethel Empowerment CorporationProvider Code: 314

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

New Era Institute of Learning, LLCProvider Code: 264

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 50 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home,

Contact Information:

Ms. Thisha Cohen18301 E. Eight Mile Road, Ste 102Eastpointe, MI 48021Telephone: 5862986626Email: neweragroup@netzero.net

Fax: 5862986619

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

79

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

15.2% 16.5%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+1.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

77

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

1.3% 1.3%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

New Era Institute of Learning, LLCProvider Code: 264

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--15.2%

7916.5%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+9.2

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

18.4% 27.6%Comparison

96.2%76

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--1.3%

771.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+2.8

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

5.6% 8.3%Comparison

93.5%72

+1.3

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

New Era Institute of Learning, LLCProvider Code: 264

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

Discovery Assessment

--

-- --

--

58.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%40.0%

51.8%60.0%

61.9%60.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%65.0%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

5 883

N/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

New Era Institute of Learning, LLCProvider Code: 264

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 6

The following are based on survey results:

31.0% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%40.5%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Orion's MindProvider Code: 303

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 30 - 10000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Adam Paris1452 West WillowChicago, IL 60642Telephone: 3127722211Email: michigan@orionsmind.com

Fax: 3126043770

Website: www.orionsmind.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Orion's MindProvider Code: 303

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Orion's MindProvider Code: 303

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Orion's MindProvider Code: 303

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Pontiac Academy for Excellence SES ProviderProvider Code: 233

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

LEA Facility

Contact Information:

Ms. Jacqueline Cassell196 Cesar E. ChavezPontiac, MI 48343Telephone: 2487459420Email: cassellj@pontiacacademy.org

Fax: 2487451275

Website: www.pontiacacademy.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Pontiac Academy for Excellence SES ProviderProvider Code: 233

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Pontiac Academy for Excellence SES ProviderProvider Code: 233

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Pontiac Academy for Excellence SES ProviderProvider Code: 233

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Priority: My EducationProvider Code: 265

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 8 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Florence Charavay2349 Plantation Oak DrOrlando, FL 32824Telephone: 8178128000Email: florence@prioritymyeducation.com

Fax:

Website: http://www.prioritymyeducation.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

32

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

28.1% 18.8%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-9.4 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

32

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

6.3% 3.1%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-3.1 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Priority: My EducationProvider Code: 265

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--28.1%

3218.8%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.2

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

20.8% 16.7%Comparison

75.0%24

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--6.3%

323.1%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

4.0% 4.0%Comparison

78.1%25

-9.4

-3.1

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Priority: My EducationProvider Code: 265

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

85.8%

Achieve Test

--

-- --

--

85.8%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%50.0%

51.8%0.0%

61.9%0.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%37.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

1 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Priority: My EducationProvider Code: 265

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 2

The following are based on survey results:

0.0% 40.0%

0.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%0.0%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

REACHING FOR THE STARSProvider Code: 304

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 15 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Shalamar Norris13335 15 Mile Rd.Sterling Heights, MI 48312Telephone: 3133005822Email: Reaching_4@YAHOO.COM

Fax: 8885572989

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

REACHING FOR THE STARSProvider Code: 304

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

REACHING FOR THE STARSProvider Code: 304

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

REACHING FOR THE STARSProvider Code: 304

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Rencher Educational SolutionsProvider Code: 227

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Social Studies

Number of Students to be served: 8 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 15 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Charles Rencher5210 Kings Gate WayBloomfield Township, MI 48302Telephone: 3137156100Email: resultsedu@yahoo.com

Fax:

Website: resultsedu.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

10

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

20.0% 30.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+10.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

10

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

20.0% 10.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-10.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Rencher Educational SolutionsProvider Code: 227

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--20.0%

1030.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

10.0% 10.0%Comparison

100.0%10

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--20.0%

1010.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-20.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

40.0% 20.0%Comparison

100.0%10

+10.0

-10.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Rencher Educational SolutionsProvider Code: 227

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

83.3%

Level Indicator

--

-- --

--

100.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%25.0%

51.8%0.0%

61.9%0.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%31.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

2 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Rencher Educational SolutionsProvider Code: 227

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 2

The following are based on survey results:

50.0% 40.0%

0.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%25.0%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Results AcademicProvider Code: 305

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 25 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Cassandra Parker14385 Elmhurst DriveSterling Heights, MI 48312Telephone: 8668094040Email: cparker@resultsacademic.com

Fax: 8668094040

Website: www.resultsacademic.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Results AcademicProvider Code: 305

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Results AcademicProvider Code: 305

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Results AcademicProvider Code: 305

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

RESULTS MENTORINGProvider Code: 228

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Charles Thomas18135 East Nine Mile RoadEastpointe, MI 48021Telephone: 3137795190Email: charles@resultsmentoring.org

Fax: 8773785873

Website: www.resultsmentoring.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

99

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

33.3% 24.2%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-9.1 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

96

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

21.9% 8.3%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-13.5 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

RESULTS MENTORINGProvider Code: 228

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--33.3%

9924.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-9.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

38.5% 29.5%Comparison

78.8%78

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--21.9%

968.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-7.5

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

14.9% 7.5%Comparison

69.8%67

-9.1

-13.5

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

RESULTS MENTORINGProvider Code: 228

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

89.0%

Pre-Test

--

-- --

--

87.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%83.8%

51.8%56.6%

61.9%57.9%

81.0%94.7%

64.5%73.2%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

19 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

RESULTS MENTORINGProvider Code: 228

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 5

The following are based on survey results:

11.4% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%30.7%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Rocket LearningProvider Code: 229

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 200 - 5000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Mr. Matthew Fields100 Park Centre Boulevard, Suite 112Miami, FL 33169Telephone: 8885053276Email: matthewfields@rocketlearning.net

Fax: 8887305019

Website: www.rocketlearning.net

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

345

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

25.2% 24.1%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-1.2 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

340

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

4.1% 4.7%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+.6 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Rocket LearningProvider Code: 229

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--25.2%

34524.1%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

31.4% 27.4%Comparison

94.2%325

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--4.1%

3404.7%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

4.8% 2.6%Comparison

91.5%311

-1.2

+.6

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Rocket LearningProvider Code: 229

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

58.3%

Limelight

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%40.0%

51.8%51.8%

61.9%48.8%

81.0%85.0%

64.5%56.4%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

39 883

N/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Rocket LearningProvider Code: 229

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 11

The following are based on survey results:

20.8% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%35.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Saginaw Valley State University Literacy CenterProvider Code: 266

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 10

Classroom: 1 tutor per 4 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Janet Rentsch7400 Bay Road, Z 228University Center, MI 48710Telephone: 9899647120Email: jrentsch@svsu.edu

Fax: 9897901276

Website: www.svsu.edu/sponsoredprograms

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Saginaw Valley State University Literacy CenterProvider Code: 266

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Saginaw Valley State University Literacy CenterProvider Code: 266

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Saginaw Valley State University Literacy CenterProvider Code: 266

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Skills of Success Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 267

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 25

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Vicky Franklin19785 W 12 Mile Rd. Ste 211Southfield, MI 48076Telephone: 2482501438Email: skillsofsuccess44@yahoo.com

Fax: 8779348886

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

7

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

28.6% 14.3%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-14.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

7

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Skills of Success Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 267

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--28.6%

714.3%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

33.3% 33.3%Comparison

85.7%6

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

70.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

85.7%6

-14.3

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Skills of Success Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 267

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%100.0%

51.8%75.0%

61.9%100.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%93.8%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

1

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Skills of Success Tutoring ServicesProvider Code: 267

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 0

The following are based on survey results:

40.0%

63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

32.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

N/A

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Super AchieversProvider Code: 268

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 350

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Marcia Mayberry46036 Michigan Avenue, Suite 299Canton, MI 48188Telephone: 8884472193Email: mmayb58229@aol.com

Fax: 7348447105

Website: mysuperachiever.com, examexperts.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

4

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 25.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+25.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

4

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Super AchieversProvider Code: 268

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

425.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

50.0% 50.0%Comparison

100.0%4

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

40.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%4

+25.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Super AchieversProvider Code: 268

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%50.0%

51.8%16.7%

61.9%50.0%

81.0%66.7%

64.5%45.8%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

3

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Super AchieversProvider Code: 268

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 3

The following are based on survey results:

19.0% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%34.5%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Auburn Hills - Ace It! TutoringProvider Code: 157

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 250

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 3 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 3 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Via Technology

Contact Information:

Mr. Idowu Jegede4161 Baldwin RoadAuburn Hills, MI 48326Telephone: 2482531732Email: sylvanaubhills@aol.com

Fax: 2482531750

Website: www.sylvanlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

7

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

28.6% 0.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-28.6 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

7

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Auburn Hills - Ace It! TutoringProvider Code: 157

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--28.6%

70.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-42.9

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

42.9% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%7

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

70.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%7

-28.6

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Auburn Hills - Ace It! TutoringProvider Code: 157

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%50.0%

51.8%0.0%

61.9%0.0%

81.0%50.0%

64.5%25.0%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

2

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Auburn Hills - Ace It! TutoringProvider Code: 157

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 7

The following are based on survey results:

57.1% 40.0%

70.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%63.6%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning Center - Auburn HillsProvider Code: 220

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 250

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 3 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 3 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Brenda Jegede4161 Baldwin RoadAuburn Hills, MI 48326Telephone: 2482531732Email: sylvanaubhills@aol.com

Fax: 2482531750

Website: www.sylvanlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning Center - Auburn HillsProvider Code: 220

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning Center - Auburn HillsProvider Code: 220

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning Center - Auburn HillsProvider Code: 220

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning Centers: Dearborn, Lincoln Park, Livonia, N. CantonProvider Code: 169

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 600

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Business

Contact Information:

Mr. Frank Jacoby2040 Monroe St.Dearborn, MI 48124Telephone: 2485355456Email: FKJacoby@aol.com

Fax: 3137248317

Website: www.educate.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

4

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 25.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+25.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

4

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning Centers: Dearborn, Lincoln Park, Livonia, N. CantonProvider Code: 169

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

425.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+25.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

25.0% 50.0%Comparison

100.0%4

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

40.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+33.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 33.3%Comparison

75.0%3

+25.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning Centers: Dearborn, Lincoln Park, Livonia, N. CantonProvider Code: 169

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

100.0%

Data Not Provided

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%83.3%

51.8%50.0%

61.9%100.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%83.3%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

6 883

N/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning Centers: Dearborn, Lincoln Park, Livonia, N. CantonProvider Code: 169

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 10

The following are based on survey results:

54.3% 40.0%

62.5% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%58.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Battle CreekProvider Code: 170

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 3 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Hillary Malone3910 Burton St. Se Suite 101Grand Rapids, MI 49546Telephone: 6169406094Email: Hillary.Malone@SylvanWestMichigan.com

Fax: 6169406214

Website: www.sylvanlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Battle CreekProvider Code: 170

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Battle CreekProvider Code: 170

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Battle CreekProvider Code: 170

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Grand RapidsProvider Code: 171

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 3 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Hillary Malone3910 Burton St. Se Suite 101Grand Rapids, MI 49546Telephone: 6169406094Email: Hillary.Malone@SylvanWestMichigan.com

Fax: 6169406214

Website: www.sylvanlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Grand RapidsProvider Code: 171

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Grand RapidsProvider Code: 171

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Grand RapidsProvider Code: 171

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of GrandvilleProvider Code: 172

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 3 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Hillary Malone3910 Burton St. Se Suite 101Grand Rapids, MI 49546Telephone: 6169406094Email: Hillary.Malone@SylvanWestMichigan.com

Fax: 6169406214

Website: www.sylvanlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of GrandvilleProvider Code: 172

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of GrandvilleProvider Code: 172

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of GrandvilleProvider Code: 172

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of JacksonProvider Code: 269

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 75

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, Place of Business

Contact Information:

Mr. Victor Peirce2500 Kerry Street Suite 100Lansing, MI 48912Telephone: 5178814712Email: vrpeirce@sbcglobal.net

Fax: 5175790454

Website: SylvanJackson.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of JacksonProvider Code: 269

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of JacksonProvider Code: 269

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of JacksonProvider Code: 269

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of KalamazooProvider Code: 174

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 3 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Hillary Malone3910 Burton St. Se Suite 101Grand Rapids, MI 49546Telephone: 6169406094Email: Hillary.Malone@SylvanWestMichigan.com

Fax: 6169406214

Website: www.sylvanlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of KalamazooProvider Code: 174

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of KalamazooProvider Code: 174

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of KalamazooProvider Code: 174

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of LansingProvider Code: 210

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 150

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business

Contact Information:

Mr. Victor Peirce2500 Kerry Street, Suite 100Lansing, MI 48912Telephone: 5173727410Email: vrpeirce@sbcglobal.net

Fax: 5173729925

Website: www.SylvanLansing.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of LansingProvider Code: 210

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of LansingProvider Code: 210

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of LansingProvider Code: 210

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of MuskegonProvider Code: 175

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 3 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Hillary Malone3910 Burton St. SeGrand Rapids, MI 49546Telephone: 6169406094Email: Hillary.Malone@SylvanWestMichigan.com

Fax: 6169406214

Website: www.sylvanlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of MuskegonProvider Code: 175

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of MuskegonProvider Code: 175

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of MuskegonProvider Code: 175

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of RockfordProvider Code: 177

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 3 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Hillary Malone3910 Burton St. Se Suite 101Grand Rapids, MI 49546Telephone: 6169406094Email: Hillary.Malone@SylvanWestMichigan.com

Fax: 6169406214

Website: www.sylvanlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of RockfordProvider Code: 177

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of RockfordProvider Code: 177

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of RockfordProvider Code: 177

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of South Canton and BrownstownProvider Code: 280

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Suzanne Schulte4235 Old Canton Center RoadCanton, MI 48188Telephone: 7343941100Email: sylvancan@sbcglobal.net

Fax: 7343941155

Website: www.educate.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of South Canton and BrownstownProvider Code: 280

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of South Canton and BrownstownProvider Code: 280

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of South Canton and BrownstownProvider Code: 280

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Traverse CityProvider Code: 178

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 3 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Hillary Malone3910 Burton St. SeGrand Rapids, MI 49546Telephone: 6169406094Email: Hillary.Malone@SylvanWestMichigan.com

Fax: 6169406214

Website: www.sylvanlearning.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Traverse CityProvider Code: 178

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Traverse CityProvider Code: 178

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Sylvan Learning of Traverse CityProvider Code: 178

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Homework Mastery CenterProvider Code: 309

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 80

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Place of Business, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Ruth Lawton12508 PaytonDetroit, MI 48224Telephone: 3133726888Email: lawtonruth@hotmail.com

Fax: 8888173861

Website: www.homeworkmastery.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Homework Mastery CenterProvider Code: 309

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Homework Mastery CenterProvider Code: 309

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Homework Mastery CenterProvider Code: 309

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Learning Center of Southwest FlintProvider Code: 107

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 0 - 40

Classroom: 1 tutor per 1 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Business

Contact Information:

Ms. Genevieve WrightG-3308 Miller Rd. Suite GFlint, MI 48507Telephone: 8107330740Email: LearningCenterSF@aol.com

Fax: 0

Website: www.learningcentersf.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Learning Center of Southwest FlintProvider Code: 107

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

30.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

33.3% 33.3%Comparison

100.0%3

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

30.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-33.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

33.3% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%3

0.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Learning Center of Southwest FlintProvider Code: 107

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%100.0%

51.8%50.0%

61.9%0.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%62.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

1

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Learning Center of Southwest FlintProvider Code: 107

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 0

The following are based on survey results:

40.0%

63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

32.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

N/A

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Learning Center, LLCProvider Code: 270

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 15 - 75

Classroom: 1 tutor per 3 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Juliana Trent28170 Fontana DriveSouthfield, MI 48076Telephone: 3133206435Email: tlc.tutoring@live.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

4

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

25.0% 25.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

4

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Learning Center, LLCProvider Code: 270

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--25.0%

425.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

50.0% 50.0%Comparison

100.0%4

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

40.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%4

0.0

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Learning Center, LLCProvider Code: 270

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

100.0%

Brigance

--

-- --

--

100.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%50.0%

51.8%50.0%

61.9%50.0%

81.0%50.0%

64.5%50.0%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

2 883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Learning Center, LLCProvider Code: 270

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 18

The following are based on survey results:

23.8% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%36.9%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Saturday School of ExcellenceProvider Code: 154

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 30 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Ms. Katrina Dunigan28643 Red Leaf LaneSouthfield, MI 48076Telephone: 2485529404Email: kvd222@yahoo.com

Fax:

Website: www.thesaturdayschoolofexcellence.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

28

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

25.0% 32.1%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+7.1 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

28

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

3.6% 3.6%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Saturday School of ExcellenceProvider Code: 154

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--25.0%

2832.1%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-14.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

38.1% 23.8%Comparison

75.0%21

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--3.6%

283.6%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-4.3

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

13.0% 8.7%Comparison

82.1%23

+7.1

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Saturday School of ExcellenceProvider Code: 154

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%61.1%

51.8%52.8%

61.9%55.6%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%67.4%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

9

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

The Saturday School of ExcellenceProvider Code: 154

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 10

The following are based on survey results:

57.1% 40.0%

77.8% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%67.5%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

To The TopProvider Code: 306

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Constance Jackson18498 Birchcrest Dr.Detroit, MI 48221Telephone: 3138639197Email: tothetoptutoring@hotmail.com

Fax: 3138639197

Website: N/A

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

To The TopProvider Code: 306

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

To The TopProvider Code: 306

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

To The TopProvider Code: 306

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Top Flight EducationProvider Code: 307

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 28 - 275

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Nicole Smith18530 Mack Ave #312Gross Pte Farms, MI 48236Telephone: 2482471185Email: office@mytopflight.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Top Flight EducationProvider Code: 307

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Top Flight EducationProvider Code: 307

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Top Flight EducationProvider Code: 307

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Total Education SolutionsProvider Code: 129

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 20

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Other

Contact Information:

Ms. Nancy J. LavelleThe Fair Oaks Building 625 South Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 200South Pasadena, CA 91030Telephone: 3233415580Email: nlavelle@tesidea.com

Fax: 3232573101

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Total Education SolutionsProvider Code: 129

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Total Education SolutionsProvider Code: 129

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Total Education SolutionsProvider Code: 129

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Total Package 180 Tutoring/MentoringProvider Code: 308

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 50 - 400

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Mr. Raphael Johnson719 Griswold Suite 820Detroit, MI 48226Telephone: 3133558226Email: the180program@gmail.com

Fax: 3137332695

Website: www.The180Program.us

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Total Package 180 Tutoring/MentoringProvider Code: 308

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Total Package 180 Tutoring/MentoringProvider Code: 308

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Total Package 180 Tutoring/MentoringProvider Code: 308

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Tutorial ServicesProvider Code: 231

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 250

Classroom: 1 tutor per 0 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 1 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Kristie Kelly166 S. Industrial Dr.Saline, MI 48176Telephone: 7344706387Email: kschaufele@tutorialservices.org

Fax: 7344706402

Website: www.tutorialservices.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Tutorial ServicesProvider Code: 231

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Tutorial ServicesProvider Code: 231

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Tutorial ServicesProvider Code: 231

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Vanguard Community Development CorporationProvider Code: 189

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 500

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Mr. Scott Alan Davis2785 East Grand BoulevardDetroit, MI 48211Telephone: 3138727831Email: SADavis@vanguardcdc.org

Fax: 3138727832

Website: www.vanguardcdc.org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Vanguard Community Development CorporationProvider Code: 189

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Vanguard Community Development CorporationProvider Code: 189

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Vanguard Community Development CorporationProvider Code: 189

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Vision Academics, L.L.C.Provider Code: 271

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 50

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Jasmine Carey7602 CherrywoodWestland, MI 48185Telephone: 3132475355Email: visionacademics22@yahoo.com

Fax: 3135357818

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

66.7% 0.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-66.7 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

33.3% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-33.3 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Vision Academics, L.L.C.Provider Code: 271

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--66.7%

30.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

33.3% 33.3%Comparison

100.0%3

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--33.3%

30.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%3

-66.7

-33.3

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Vision Academics, L.L.C.Provider Code: 271

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

100.0%

BRIGANCE TEST

--

-- --

--

100.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Vision Academics, L.L.C.Provider Code: 271

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 4

The following are based on survey results:

35.7% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%42.9%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

W Salome TutoringProvider Code: 193

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 5 - 1000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation Yes

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship

Contact Information:

Mr. Jeffery Frazier1428 W Court StFlint, MI 48503Telephone: 8102873244Email: WSALOMELLC@aol.com

Fax: 8104969542

Website: www.wsalometutoring.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

84

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

13.1% 27.4%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+14.3 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

82

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

4.9% 2.4%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-2.4 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

W Salome TutoringProvider Code: 193

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--13.1%

8427.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+6.8

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

15.1% 21.9%Comparison

86.9%73

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--4.9%

822.4%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

2.9% 2.9%Comparison

84.1%69

+14.3

-2.4

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

W Salome TutoringProvider Code: 193

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%40.4%

51.8%24.0%

61.9%33.3%

81.0%54.2%

64.5%38.0%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

24

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

W Salome TutoringProvider Code: 193

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 18

The following are based on survey results:

42.9% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%46.4%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Washtenaw Intermediate School DistrictProvider Code: 194

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 8 - 10

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English LanguageInstruction of students with disabilitiesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Places of service:

LEA Facility

Contact Information:

Dr. Sarena Shivers1819 S. Wagner Rd. Po Box 1406Ann Arbor, MI 48106Telephone: 7349948100Email: sshivers@wash.k12.mi.us

Fax: 7349942203

Website: www.wash.k12.mi.us

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Washtenaw Intermediate School DistrictProvider Code: 194

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Washtenaw Intermediate School DistrictProvider Code: 194

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Washtenaw Intermediate School DistrictProvider Code: 194

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Wonder-Space ETCProvider Code: 311

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 5000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 1 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 1 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online, Other

Contact Information:

Mr. Malik Mott2900 Weslayan Ste 545Houston, TX 77027Telephone: 7135292241Email: malik@ses.wonder-space.com

Fax: 7135415330

Website: www.ses.wonder-space.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Wonder-Space ETCProvider Code: 311

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Wonder-Space ETCProvider Code: 311

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Wonder-Space ETCProvider Code: 311

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Wonder-Space MobileProvider Code: 312

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science, Social St

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 10000

Classroom: 1 tutor per 1 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 1 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 1 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language YesInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Emmie Chang2900 Weslayan, Suite 545Houston, TX 77027Telephone: 7135292241Email: emmie@ses.wonder-space.com

Fax: 7133415330

Website: www. ses.wonder-space.com

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Wonder-Space MobileProvider Code: 312

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Wonder-Space MobileProvider Code: 312

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Wonder-Space MobileProvider Code: 312

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

YOUNG AND EDUCATED SERVICES INC.Provider Code: 313

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics, Science

Number of Students to be served: 15 - 300

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Business, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home, Via Technology, Online

Contact Information:

Ms. Tameria Gaylor2899 E. Big Beaver Road Suite 101Troy, MI 48083Telephone: 3134927173Email: YANDESERVICES@YAHOO.COM

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

YOUNG AND EDUCATED SERVICES INC.Provider Code: 313

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

YOUNG AND EDUCATED SERVICES INC.Provider Code: 313

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

YOUNG AND EDUCATED SERVICES INC.Provider Code: 313

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Your Financial Insight, LLCProvider Code: 196

Subject Areas: Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 25 - 200

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities NoOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:6, 7, 8

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Vicky Franklin19785 W. 12 Mile Rd. #211Southfield, MI 48076Telephone: 2489308485Email: vroshall@yourfinancialinsight.org

Fax: 8779348886

Website: www.yourfinancialinsight..org

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

4

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

25.0% 50.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+25.0 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

3

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

33.3% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-33.3 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Your Financial Insight, LLCProvider Code: 196

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--25.0%

450.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+25.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

25.0% 50.0%Comparison

100.0%4

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--33.3%

30.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%3

+25.0

-33.3

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Your Financial Insight, LLCProvider Code: 196

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%100.0%

51.8%75.0%

61.9%100.0%

81.0%100.0%

64.5%93.8%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

1

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Your Financial Insight, LLCProvider Code: 196

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 0

The following are based on survey results:

40.0%

63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

32.3%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

N/A

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Youth Enrichment Services Y.E.S.Provider Code: 273

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 10 - 150

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 0 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 0 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation No

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Community Center, LEA Facility, Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Ms. Mary Smith19268 BuffaloDetroit, MI 48234Telephone: 3132897121Email: enrichmentyouth@yahoo.com

Fax:

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

6

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

16.7% 0.0%

3478

24.5% 23.9%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

-16.7 -.6

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider

7

This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

0.0% 0.0%

3459

6.1% 4.2%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0 -1.9

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Youth Enrichment Services Y.E.S.Provider Code: 273

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--16.7%

60.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

+50.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

33.3% 83.3%Comparison

100.0%6

MATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--0.0%

70.0%

Percent Change from Pre/Post

0.0

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

0.0% 0.0%Comparison

100.0%7

-16.7

0.0

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Youth Enrichment Services Y.E.S.Provider Code: 273

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

99.0%

--

-- --

--

99.0%

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor ELA

No ProviderAssessment Data

ProvidedFor Mathematics

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

63.3%

51.8%

61.9%

81.0%

64.5%

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

0

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

No qualifying 2010/2011 dataavailable for this section.

883

N/AN/A

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING: N/A

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 Data

Youth Enrichment Services Y.E.S.Provider Code: 273

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider: 3

The following are based on survey results:

33.3% 40.0%

50.0% 63.4%

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

51.7%41.7%

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

N/A N/A N/A

Composite Score

N/A indicates that data was unavailable for the category

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 DataYpsilanti Community Resource Non-Profit Organization

Provider Code: 197

Subject Areas: English, Mathematics

Number of Students to be served: 1 - 30

Classroom: 1 tutor per 5 studentsVia technology 1 tutor per 8 studentsDistance learning: 1 tutor per 30 students

Instruction in the use of the English Language NoInstruction of students with disabilities YesOffers transportation At select sites only

Student-Tutor ratios:

Grades Served:K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Places of service:

Place of Religious Worship, Student’s Home

Contact Information:

Mr. Ryan Owens200 Harriet StreetYpsilanti, MI 48197Telephone: 7342725100Email: ryano@messiastemple.org

Fax: 7344833329

Website:

About this State-Approved Program:

MEAP RESULTS RATING Table 1 Statewide Comparison:

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Category All SES StudentsStatewide

All SES StudentsStatewide

This Provider This Provider

Number of students with both pre/post scores

Percent of students at or above proficiency

Pre Post Pre PostPercent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Change from Pre/Post

--

--

Table 1Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES STUDENTS ONLY: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

MATHEMATICS

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

NO QUALIFYING DATA AVAILABLE FOR 2010 / 2011

Page 1

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 DataYpsilanti Community Resource Non-Profit Organization

Provider Code: 197

ENGLISH / LANGUAGE ARTS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

ComparisonMATHEMATICS

Number of Students Participating

Number Matches

PreSES

Post--

Percent Change from Pre/Post

Percent Matched Students

Percent of Students Proficient

Comparison

* Comparison students are students from the same building and grade level who qualify for SES at the school, but did not participate.

Table 2Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Data

SES AND COMPARISON* STUDENTS MATCHED: MEAP RESULTSFall 2010 Pre-test Scores; Fall 2011 Post-test Scores

Composite of all Grades Tested

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than it is for SES students statewide for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 1

Receive one star if the percent change is greater for the program students than for the comparison students for the subject(s) taught by the program. Table 2

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

Summary of Table 1 & Table 2 MEAP Rating Earned:

SUMMARYMEAP Data Overview Rating Results Tables 1 and 2

For ELA and Mathematics in tables 1 & 2, stars are earned as follows:

A total of two stars in each subject taught is possible.

Page 2

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 DataYpsilanti Community Resource Non-Profit Organization

Provider Code: 197

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT

-- ELA

Program Completion Rate:

--

Percent of Students showing Gains on Provider Assessment

--

Type of pre/post Assessment Used by Provider:

--

-- --

--

Mathematics

PROVIDER ASSESSMENT RATING - Percents of Students Showing Gains on Provider AssessmentsStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if 10% - 25% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive two stars if 26% - 50% of students made gains in the subject.

Receive three stars if more than 50% of students made gains in the subject.

English/Language Arts:Mathematics:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Parents / Guardians of Participating Students

This Provider All SES Providers

Number of Surveys Completed by Parents

All SES Providers

Percent of ParentsReporting Satisfaction with Providers

This Provider

Communication & Interaction

Parents' Perceptions of Students' Attitudes towards School& School workParents' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Overall Satisfaction

Composite Score:

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

Receive one star if parents' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to/greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is 75% or greater.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

A total of three stars is possible.

PARENT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

The following are based on survey results:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Education2011-12 Detailed Provider Profile using 2010-2011 DataYpsilanti Community Resource Non-Profit Organization

Provider Code: 197

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

--Number of Surveys Completed by Teachers This Provider:

The following are based on survey results:

Overall Satisfaction

Teachers' Perception of Student Improvement as Result of Program

Communication & Interaction

All SES ProvidersThis Provider

Percent of TeachersReporting Satisfaction with Providers

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATINGStars are earned as follows:

TEACHER CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RATING:

Receive one star if teachers' perception of student improvement is equal to or greater than the same score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if this provider's composite score is equal to or greater than the composite score for all SES providers.

Receive one star if teachers' overall satisfaction score for this provider is equal to or greater than the overall satisfaction score for all SES providers. NOTE: Data for overall satisfaction is not available for 2010/11, therefore this star will not be awarded.

CategoryMEAP

(2 possible stars)Provider Assessment

(3 possible stars)Parent Satisfaction

(3 possible stars)

RatingELA

Teacher Satisfaction(2 possible stars)

MATH ELA MATH

SUMMARY OF PROVIDER RATINGS BY CATEGORY

Composite Score

A total of two stars is possible.

Page 4