Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D. Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

24
Applied systemic approach in the banking sector: financial contagion in the “cheques- as-collateral” network Michalis Vafopoulos joint work with D. Soumpekas 6/5/2011 Aristotle University, Mathematics Department Master in Web Science supported by Municipality of Veria

description

Aristotle University, Mathematics Department Master in Web Science. supported by Municipality of Veria. Applied systemic approach in the banking sector: financial contagion in the “cheques-as-collateral” network . Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D. Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011. outline. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D. Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Page 1: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Applied systemic approach in the banking sector:

financial contagion in the “cheques-as-collateral” network

Michalis Vafopoulosjoint work with D. Soumpekas

6/5/2011

Aristotle University, Mathematics Department Master in Web Science

supported by Municipality of Veria

Page 2: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

outline① Financial crisis: a network

explanation② Why networks? ③ Systemic risk and financial

contagion④ The “cheques-as-collateral”

network⑤ Data and model⑥ Results ⑦ Further extensions 2

Page 3: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Financial crisis: a network explanation

• 2007: Started from US sub-prime and disseminated rapidly to the global real economy

• Regulation based on binary relations – Government & bank– Bank & customer

• and in “too big to fail”

• Research on correlation and market risk (VaR-like metrics)

3

Page 4: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Financial crisis: a network explanation

Current risk systems cannot:• Predict failure cascades. • Account for linkages. • Determine counterparty losses.

4

Page 5: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Financial crisis: a network explanation

But the financial system is:A global networked system

So, + “too interconnected to fail”

How to model it?Networks!

5

Page 6: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Why networks? • Easy to model and visualize relations• Easy to calculate major statistics • The study of the Web network help us to

conclude that most of real networks are:– Self-similar (Scale-free)– Small worlds

6

Page 7: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

NETWORK THEORY

Financial Network Analysis

Biological Network Analysis

Graph & Matrix Theory

Web Science

Social Network Analysis

Computer Science

Network theory and related fields

Page 8: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

how? • Define:1. Node (e.g. person, business)2. Link [directed or not] (e.g. friendship, commerce)

And if necessary:3. Evaluation of node (e.g. score, potential)4. Evaluation of link (weight) (e.g. trust)

8

4 50.54

Page 9: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Federal fundsBech, M.L. and Atalay, E. (2008), “The Topology of the Federal Funds Market”. ECB Working Paper No. 986. Iori G, G de Masi, O Precup, G Gabbi and G Caldarelli (2008): “A

network analysis of the Italian overnight money market”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 32(1), pages 259-278

Italian money market

Financial networksFocused on banks, financial institutions etc.

Page 10: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Financial Systemic risk from grass-roots

What about trying model systemic risk directly from bank customers?

Financial systemic risk• The risk of disruption to a financial entity

with spillovers to the real economy.• The risk that critical nodes of a financial

network fail disrupting linkages.• Financial contracts with externalities.

10

Page 11: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

The “cheques-as-collateral” network

• Nodes: cheque issuers and recipients • Link ij : customer i issues cheque to customer

j• Weight of link: the fraction of the value of

cheques that customer i have issued to customer j, to the total value of cheques in euros received by the bank

Cheque recipients use their incoming cheques as collateral to working capital credit.

11

Page 12: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Data

Page 13: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

The model-1Step 01. Assume a set of criteria for the

failure of every customer (c). Here it is assumed that c=50% of the total amount of the unpaid cheques that drives every customer to failure. 2. For a given “cheques-as-collateral” network, calculate the weighted adjacency matrix (W).

Page 14: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

The model-2Step 03. Calculate the failure threshold for every customer j:

It is assumed that this threshold remains constant in every stage k.

4. Assume a set of customers that initially fail to pay their cheques (Dk=0).

This set can be chosen by some relevant criterion. In our case, five customers with the highest weighted out-degree have been selected to collapse at stage k=0.

Page 15: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

The model-3Step 11. Calculate the sum of the defaulted

exposures of failed customer i to j:

Page 16: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

The model-4Step 12. Compare the calculated defaulted exposure failure threshold of customer j.

3. Update Dk with the failed customers.

Page 17: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

The model-5Step 2• Repeat Step 1 until Dk=Dk+1.

Page 18: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Results-1

18

Stage 0 Number of failed nodes: 5Decrease in total value: 17%

Page 19: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Results-2

19

Stage 1Number of failed nodes: 4Decrease in total value: 27%

Page 20: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Results-3

20

Stage 2Number of failed nodes: 3Decrease in total value: 38%

Page 21: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Results-4

21

Stage 3Number of failed nodes: 2Decrease in total value: 41%

Page 22: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Results-5

22

After the shock

Number of failed nodes: 14Decrease in total value: 41%

Page 23: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Evaluating the systemic risk of a bank customer

• Assume that only a customer fails• Ceteris paribus• Calculate financial contagion• Compare to others• Weight factors like stage, sector etc

23

Page 24: Michalis Vafopoulos j oint work with D.  Soumpekas 6/ 5 /2011

Further extensions• More data and metrics• Model the initial shock• Reverse logic: development

multiplier

Thank you.Questions?

24