Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects
-
Upload
danube-university-krems-centre-for-e-governance -
Category
Technology
-
view
468 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects
![Page 1: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Success Factors and Evaluation of E-Participation
OurSpace Workshop at CeDEM13 www.joinourspace.eu
www.donau-uni.ac.at/cedem
Michael Sachs & Judith Schoßböck Centre for E-Governance, Danube University Krems
![Page 2: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Introduction o General input about e-participation o The OurSapce project
• Success Factors & Indicators o Concrete definition of factors
• Evaluation models o The OurSpace Evaluation Methodology o Discussion on evaluation of e-part projects
Structure of the Workshop
![Page 3: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• General input about e-participation and evaluation
• Short intro to the OurSpace project
Introduction - Overview
![Page 4: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Techno-Optimsim
• Evaluation
• Success factors
Introduction
![Page 5: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
OurSpace – The Virtual Youth Space
![Page 6: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Funded by the EC Consortium
![Page 7: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Implementation of an innovative communication platform for democratic participation
• Creating a community that focuses on discussing political issue that are relevant for young people.
• Forward the results of the deliberation process to decision makers and institutions.
• To make young people familiar with decision makers, governmental/political institutions and the decision making process.
• A sustainable and inexpensive platform and the evaluation thereof.
Objectives
![Page 8: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Web 2.0: Integration of Socialen Media and Networks • Discussion with 4 langauges • Outcome oriented discussion
o Preparation of National and European themes for young people o Make politics relevant for young people
• Involvement of o Young people o Decision makers o Public institutions
Challenges
![Page 9: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Mobile communication channels o Android App, Website optimised for mobile phones
• Facebook-Integration o Registration, Facebook App
• Implementation of Google Translate o Moderated discussion in all stages of the deliberation
process
Features
![Page 10: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1. Suggest a theme and rate a theme 2. Discuss a theme and provide comments and
proposals; rate ideas 3. Rate the pre selected best proposals 4. Show results and get feedback from relevant
bodies and persons.
Deliberation in 4 Stages
![Page 11: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Participation in Mothertounge
![Page 12: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Points system for motivation
![Page 13: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Success Factors Group Discussion
Outcomes
![Page 14: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Please introduce yourself briefly and make a short statement on one of the following issues: • Name one factor for success in e-
participation. • Name one factor for failure in e-
participation.
Warm up with each person in group
![Page 15: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• initiated: top-down vs. bottom-up • local vs. global perspective • target group and specific purpose vs. all
inclusive eParticipation • participation as legitimation vs.
collaboration
Success perspectives for discussion
![Page 16: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Discussion in small groups • What factors lead to (no-) success in known
e-participation projects? o Briefly describe the project (scope and aim). o Describe the (no-) success factor and its impact on
the project. o Could this factor be a general factor for (un-)
success in other projects? o How can you measure these (no-) success factors?
(evaluation)
~ 15-20 min. discussion. One presenter per group
(No-) Success factors from specific projects
![Page 17: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Evaluation Methodologies
Input from Moderators Group Discussion
![Page 18: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
• Several levels for evaluation • Definition of Indicators (Indicator
categories) for each level of evaluation • Description of methods and tools for
evaluation • Definition of success criteria for the
measure
Evaluation Methodologies
![Page 19: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
4 layered approach (based on existing evaluation models) • Political level • Impact and Relevance • Technical level • Technological Implementation • Social level • Users Perspective • Methodological level • Procedures
OurSpace: Approach
![Page 20: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
• Questionnaires • Interviews • Media analysis • Performance Monitoring Tool • Discourse analysis • Data
o Platform, Google Analytics o Facebook, blogs, events
OurSpace: Evaluation tools
![Page 21: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Indicator Categories
![Page 22: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Indicator Category: Political Level
![Page 23: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Measurement and Tools
![Page 24: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• Your experience with eParticipation evaluation models? What were useful tools?
• Quantitative vs. qualitative models? • Which success factors should always be evaluated?
(and why?) • How complex do evaluation models need to be? • Is there a need for standardised models in
eParticipation? • General problems in evaluation of e-participation? • How to measure impact of a project on societal and
political level? • Internal vs. external evaluation of projects.
Evaluation models (discussion)
![Page 25: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Outcomes and Summary
Success factors and indicators Evaluation models
Summary at the blog of the conference digitalgovernment.wordpress.com
www.joinourspace.eu
![Page 26: Michael Sachs, Judith Schossböck – Evaluation of e‐participation projects](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110114/5459b548af795998788b5854/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
We want your feedback! 1. Register 2. Explore the plattfrom 3. Give Feedback