MH@A - Deliverable 3.6 inc Appendix II/file/D3 6 - Acceptance of Hardware... · T3.2-026 Alarm list...
Transcript of MH@A - Deliverable 3.6 inc Appendix II/file/D3 6 - Acceptance of Hardware... · T3.2-026 Alarm list...
DELIVERABLE 3.6
05-10-2009
1 (27)
www.myhealth-age.eu
Deliverable3.6ACCEPTANCEOFHARDWAREANDSOFTWAREPROTOTYPE
IMPLEMENTATION
Revision:PA4Authors: StevenDevlin,GeorgeMoore–UniversityofUlster
DELIVERABLE 3.6
05-10-2009
2 (27)
www.myhealth-age.eu
Contents 1 OverviewofDeliverable 3
2 D3.6‐AcceptanceofHardwareandSoftwarePrototypeImplementation‐MobileSafetyAlarm 4
3 D3.6‐AcceptanceofHardwareandSoftwarePrototypeImplementation‐PrescribedHealthcare 7
4 D3.6‐AcceptanceofHardwareandSoftwarePrototypeImplementation‐SocialNetworking 10
5 HandsetEvaluationinNorthernIreland 16 AppendixI NorthernIrelandHandsetEvaluationForm 22AppendixII AcceptanceTestingReportfromNorway 23
DELIVERABLE 3.6
05-10-2009
3 (27)
www.myhealth-age.eu
1 OverviewofDeliverable
Thegoalofthisdeliverableisdetailthecurrentstateofprototypedevelopment.Followingonfrom
the tasks specified inDeliverables3.2–3.5,RequirementsSpecifications,each task is classifiedaseither Developed, Not Developed or Partially Developed (denoted as Yes / No / Partial), anddependingonthestate,ifthishasbeencarriedoutasaFullorPrototypeAcceptablestate,andany
otherrelevantnoteswithreferencetothetask.
The tablesused in thisDeliverable canbe cross‐referencedwithDeliverables3.2–3.5 for furtherdetailsoneachTask.
Followingon fromsubsequent iterationsof theMH@APrototype, thisdeliverablewillbeupdatesaccordingly.
IncludedinthisDeliverableisanoverviewoftheHandsetEvaluationinNorthernIreland.TheUser
Group were asked to use and evaluation 4 handsets. Their evaluation and comments wererecorded;Section5isanoverviewofthis.
AlsoincludedisareportfromAcceptanceTestingcarriedoutinNorway.Someoftheresultsofthishavebeenmergedwith Sections 2 – 4, but as someother relevant findingswere included in this
report,ithasbeenincorporatedinthisDeliverableinAppendixII.
ID Title Implemented Acceptance
T3.2-001 Communication with alarm centre
Yes Requires field testing
T3.2-002 Voice call to the person who initiated mobile alarm
Yes Requires field testing
T3.2-003 Mobile safety alarm reliability - Operational
Yes Tested with BTS server. Requires field testing
T3.2-004 Mobile safety alarm initiation (active initiation)
Yes Tested with BTS server. Two minute activation delay and two minute connection delay may be too long. Requires field testing
T3.2-005 Mobile safety alarm initiation (passive initiation)
Yes Tested with BTS server. Two minute activation delay and two minute connection delay may be too long. Requires field testing
T3.2-006 Alarm if electrical appliances are on for a long time (stove, coffee machine, television etc.)
No Not included in this iteration
T3.2-007 House surveillance. Alarm if not all doors and windows are not closed when leaving the home.
No Not included in this iteration
T3.2-008 Activate assault alarm Yes Requires field testing
T3.2-009 Notification that the mobile safety alarm has been initiated properly
Yes Requires field testing
T3.2-010 Cancel false alarm Yes Cancels on releasing button making it difficult to determine when the button has been held down long enough to cancel the alarm. Difficult to understand the feedback beeps. May be confusing for end user. Difficult to cancel if not in Safety Alarm application.
T3.2-011 Mobile safety alarm charging Not tested Dependent on use. Requires field testing.
T3.2-012 Wireless connection between smart phone and fall sensor
Yes Occasionally slow to connection, despite Bluetoth pairing having been established.
T3.2-013 Fall sensor range Not tested Limited by range of Bluetooth connection, as anticipated.
T3.2-014 Mobile safety alarm – physical robustness
Not tested Fall sensor has been built to withstand appropriate drops. The mobile phone handset should also hve been drop tested but is the more fragile device.
General System Requirements
Alarm customer end-user requirements
PrototypeImplementa.on‐MobileSafetyAlarmD3.6‐AcceptanceofHardwareandSo>ware
T3.2-015 Navigation precision Yes GPS position when available is passed to the Alarm Center users regardless of alarm status. However it will not be forwarded by SMS/EMail unless there is an alarm. Accuracy of GPS is dependent on location. Requires field testing.
T3.2-016 Navigation reliability Yes GPS position is supported. GSM/3G cell positioning not supported. Accuracy of GPS is dependent on location. Requires field testing
T3.2-017 Navigation availability Yes This functionality already available via BTS Server and PC Client software upon request. Accuracy of GPS is dependent on location. Requires field testing
T3.2-018 Navigation support No Mapping application already available. Not yet integrated with Mobile Alarm Software. Requires field testing
T3.2-019 Configuration of alarm receivers Partial Partial. Native feature of BTS PC client app. Requires Field Testing.
T3.2-020 Integrity Not Tested This is possible via BTS Server. Requires field testing.
T3.2-021 Manual/ instructions Yes Requires field testing
T3.2-022 Warning when alarm customer moves outside area where alarm assistance is provided
Yes Boundaries can be configured for end customers using BTS PC Client software, and alarms may be initiated when the end customer leaves the region defined by the boundary. Red spot and distance shown when outside boundary but this could be confused as there not being a GPS signal.
T3.2-023 Presentation of alarm customer information
Not Tested Access not provided. Requires field testing
T3.2-024 Presentation of GPS information Not Tested Available on Alarm Center PC Client software, but the Arctic Group Mobile Alarm has not yet been integrated into the BTS Handset software. Access not provided. Requires field testing
T3.2-025 Distribute alarm assistance request
Not Tested Access not provided. Requires field testing
T3.2-026 Alarm list No Access not provided. Requires field testing
T3.2-027 Alarm notification Partial BTS PC Client can be configured to give Audio alarms if neccessary. Same with BTS Handset Client (for prefessionals). Access not provided. Requires field testing
T3.2-027 Restrict alarm notification to my actual region
No Access not provided. Requires field testing
T3.2-029 Activate/deactivate availability to provide alarm support.
Partial May be done by request, and may then be done using BTS Client software.Access not provided. Requires field testing
Alarm Centre requirements
Requirements from people providing support to the person in need
T3.2-030 Accept/reject alarm request No Access not provided. Requires field testing
T3.2-031 Help to find person in need Partial Existing BTS Handset software provides maps that can show assistant's position and position of person in need. Not yet integrated with Mobile Alarm software. No voice directions yet. Access not provided. Requires field testing
T3.2-032 Picture of alarm end-user No Access not provided. Requires field testing
T3.2-033 Voice communication with other alarm list members and the alarm centre
No Access not provided. Requires field testing
T3.2-034 Urgancy of safety alarm Yes Alarm type is shown by the BTS PC client software and passed on by SMS/EMail. e.g It says PANIC or SENSOR_MODULE:FALL. Access not provided. Requires field testing
ID Title Implemented Acceptance
T3.3-001 Integrity No Not a design task. All patients participating in the field trial are assumed to have approved of making their data available for healthcare and welfare staff
T3.3-002 Safety Yes Full
T3.3-003 Access to own medical data Partial Much of the interface has not been translated to other languages. This prevents access to the system. Not accepted.
T3.3-004 Get professional healthcare and welfare advice on activities of importance for personal good health.
Partial Requires field testing
T3.3-005 Medical help based on actual health status
Partial Prototype.This must be accounted for by the healthcare staff. Data entered in the system will be stored and ordered according to actuality, Requires field testing
T3.3-006 Easily understandable information about my health
Partial Prototype: This must be accounted for by the healthcare staff. Requires field testing
T3.2-007 Send requests to healthcare and welfare professionals
Yes Requires field testing
T3.2-008 Get notification when it is time to do prescribed healthcare activities
Yes Requires field testing
General system requirements
Elderly People end-user requirements
D3.6‐AcceptanceofHardwareandSo5ware Prototype Implementation - Prescribed Healthcare
T3.3-009 Report when prescribed healthcare activities are performed and visualization of series of measurements
Yes Visualisations are largely text based and at times formating is not acceptable. Requires further refinment. Requires field testing
T3.3-010 Check that medication is correct Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-011 Receive feedback from relevant medical personal
Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-012 Receive information regarding tests taken at healthcare centres or hospitals
Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-013 Measurement and presentation of walking exercise
Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-014 Measurement of blood pressure Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-015 Measurement of blood glucose Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-016 INR monitoring to get Waran medication instructions
Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-017 2-chanel ecg-monitoring Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-018 Support to quit smoking Partial A link to a lifestyle centre will be provided. Requires field testing
T3.3-019 Support for people with extensive overweight to loose weight
Partial A link to a lifestyle centre will be provided. Requires field testing
T3.3-020 Support to warn when eating to much
Partial A link to a lifestyle centre will be provided, Requires field testing
T3.3-021 Diary Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-022 Schedule with appointments Yes Full
T3.3-023 Phone book with contact information to healthcare and welfare professionals
No No. It would be more appropriate to handle this through the address book of the mobile terminal
T3.3-024 Clean hospitals that don’t make elderly people sick
No Outside the scope of the project
T3.3-025 Transfer instructions to the end-user.
Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-026 Receive questions from the end-users
Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-027 Receive diagnose measurements
Yes Requires field testing
T3.3-028 Receive ECG-diagrams Yes Prototype: An external programme will be needed to view the ECG:s
Healthcare and welfare professionals requirements
ID Title Implemented Acceptance
T3.4-001 Map Based User Interface for use with Resources
No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-002 Map Based User Interface for use with People
No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-003 Text based user interface for use with Resources
Yes Resources may be tagged. Requires field testing.
T3.4-004 Text based user interface for use with People
Yes Requires field testing
T3.4-005 Text based user interface for use with Discussions
Yes Requires field testing
T3.4-006 Responsive in Use - Interaction Yes Instant in general use
T3.4-007 Responsive in Use – Results of Interaction
Yes One second in general use
T3.4-008 Secure Data Storage Yes On advice from supplier. Requires field testing
T3.4-009 Secure Data Communication Yes? On advice from supplier. Requires field testing
T3.4-010 Secure Data Management Yes? On advice from supplier. Requires field testing
T3.4-011 Operating System Support Yes Requires field testing
D3.6‐AcceptanceofHardwareandSo5warePrototypeImplementa;on‐SocialNetworking
T3.4-012 Reliable Operational Yes Requires field testing
T3.4-013 Reliable Recovery Yes Requires field testing
T3.4-014 Optimised power consumption N/A Requires field testing
T3.4-015 Wide communication range Yes Requires field testing
T3.4-016 Precise location data No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-017 Precise navigation data - Walking
No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-018 Precise navigation data - Driving
No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-019 Data Storage Yes On advice from supplier. Requires field testing
T3.4-020 Data Sharing Yes Inherent in the system
T3.4-021 Data Privacy Yes On advice from supplier. Requires field testing
T3.4-022 Multichannel communication - SMS
Yes Now not the preferred channel. Requires field testing
T3.4-023 Multichannel communication – Web-Based Interface
Yes Provides additional features to the mobile client. Requires field testing
T3.4-024 Multichannel communication – email
Yes Not the preferred channel. Requires field testing
T3.4-025 Multichannel communication – Instant Messaging
Indirectly Core messageing was moved to an IP based mobile client.This provides almost instant messaging without additional per message cost. Requires field testing
T3.4-026 Multichannel communication – Voice
Partial As a mobile phone but not explicitly supported by the social networking system. Requires field testing
T3.4-027 User should be able to share their location with other users.
Yes Can be shared by messaging and resources may be tagged. Requires field testing.
T3.4-028 User should be able to share their location with other users.
Yes Can be shared by messaging and resources may be tagged. Requires field testing.
T3.4-029 User should be able to share their location with other users.
Yes Can be shared by messaging and resources may be tagged. Requires field testing.
T3.4-030 User should be able to share their location with other users.
Yes Can be shared by messaging and resources may be tagged. Requires field testing.
T3.4-031 User should be able to share their location with other users.
Yes Can be shared by messaging and resources may be tagged. Requires field testing.
T3.4-032 User should be able to share their location with other users.
Yes Can be shared by messaging and resources may be tagged. Requires field testing.
T3.4-033 User Management of Location Access - Who has access
No Location is not actively shared by the system. It is shared as the user desires through message content and tagging. Requires field testing
T3.4-034 User Management of Location Access -Mode of access
No Location is not actively shared by the system. It is shared as the user desires through message content and tagging. Requires field testing
T3.4-035 User Management of Location Access - Amend access
No Location is not actively shared by the system. It is shared as the user desires through message content and tagging. Requires field testing
T3.4-036 User Management of Location Access - Amend mode of acess
No Location is not actively shared by the system. It is shared as the user desires through message content and tagging. Requires field testing
T3.4-037 Show Map Based Location of People
No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-038 Show Map Based Location of Resources
No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-039 Show Text Based Location of People
No Location is not actively shared by the system. It is shared as the user desires through message content and tagging. Requires field testing
T3.4-040 Show Text Based Location of Resources
No Location is not actively shared by the system. It is shared as the user desires through message content and tagging. Requires field testing
T3.4-041 Allow user to manage their profile data - Viewing
Yes Requires field testing
T3.4-042 Allow user to manage their profile data - Editing
No Profiles are created by the administrator. Requires field testing
T3.4-043 Allow users to Include who can contact them
Yes User controls which groups they join. Requires field testing
T3.4-044 Allow users to Exclude who can contact them
Yes User controls which groups they join. Requires field testing
T3.4-045 Allow users to control when they can be contacted by Individuals
No Only by exiting the application. Requires field testing
T3.4-046 Allow users to control when they can be contacted by Groups
No Only by exiting the application. Requires field testing
T3.4-047 Create discussions within user groups
Yes Users can create dicussions. Requires field testing
T3.4-048 Participate in discussions within user groups
Yes Can belong to multiple groups and discussions. Requires field testing
T3.4-049 Create discussions between user groups
Yes Users can create dicussions. Requires field testing
T3.4-050 Participate in discussions between user groups
Yes Can belong to multiple groups and discussions. Requires field testing
T3.4-051 Provide Context-Aware services - Location
No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-052 Provide Context-Aware services - Privacy
No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-053 Provide Context-Aware services - Contact
No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-054 Pervasive Service Delivery - Location
Yes Providing network coverage is available. Requires field testing
T3.4-055 Pervasive Service Delivery - Time
Yes Providing network coverage is available. Requires field testing
T3.4-056 Stable in operation Yes Requires field testing
T3.4-057 Upgradeable architecture Yes Exists as a web application
T3.4-058 Support for activities of daily living
No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-059 Support a feeling of safety Not Tested Improved social connection may meet this need. Requires field testing.
T3.4-060 Support independent living Not Tested Improved social connection may meet this need. Requires field testing.
T3.4-061 Support for social and recreational activities
Not Tested Improved social connection may meet this need. Requires field testing.
T3.4-062 Mobile platform Yes Mobile IP based client
T3.4-063 Support feeling of social inclusion
Not Tested Improved social connection may meet this need. Requires field testing.
T3.4-064 Include weather forecast No Now falls outside the scope of the project
T3.4-065 Home / Not Home No Now falls outside the scope of the project
5 Handset Evaluation in Northern Ireland
5.1 Introduction
Following confirmation of Ethical approval on the 2nd March 2009, a meeting with the User Group was organised for the 25th March, to focus on evaluation of the potential mobile handsets to be used for the evaluation phase.
Currently the Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 is being used as the project’s handset of choice, pending user evaluation. The findings documented here should be used to inform future handset selection decisions.
The partners in attendance who helped facilitate the session where; Denise McBride (Newry & Mourne Senior Citizens Consortium), Patricia Toner (Southern Trust), Suzanne Martin (UUJ, WP2) and Steven Devlin (UUJ, WP3) attended the User Group Meeting. This document details the findings from this meeting.
5.2 Handsets, Evaluation and Results
In Northern Ireland, we were able to provide four handsets for evaluation. The Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1, HTC Touch Pro and Samsung Omnia are all Windows Mobile 6.1 Professional based handsets as per the requirements specified for the prototype. But we also decided to include the Apple iPhone in this evaluation as its innovative touchscreen interface is regarded as one of the easiest to use by many technical reviews.
We asked each member of the user group to engage with each of the handsets separately. On the Windows Mobile handsets, text could be viewed and entered using the ‘Notes’ application, and on Apple’s own ‘Notes’ application on the iPhone. While engaging with each handset, the user group were also asked to fill in a questionnaire on each handset, which can be seen in Appendix 1.
While the group were using each of the devices, the project members in attendance each sat with one or two of the group to record any other comments they had, assist in using the handsets and filling out the questionnaires where required. Table 1 shows the combined results from the questionnaires for all handsets from the entire group.
Very Easy Fairly Easy DifficultVery
Difficult
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 3 3HTC Touch Pro 5 1Apple iPhone 4 1 1
Samsung Omnia 4 1 1
Very Easy Fairly Easy DifficultVery
Difficult
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 1 2 2 1HTC Touch Pro 3 2 1Apple iPhone 3 1 1 1
Samsung Omnia 2 1 3
Too SmallA Little Small
OKA Little Big
Too Big
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 3 1 2HTC Touch Pro 2 4Apple iPhone 3 3
Samsung Omnia 1 5
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 2 3 1HTC Touch Pro 3 2 1Apple iPhone 1 2 1 2
Samsung Omnia 3 1 2
Very Easy Fairly Easy DifficultVery
Difficult
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 2 3 1HTC Touch Pro 3 1 2Apple iPhone 6
Samsung Omnia 2 4
Too SmallA Little Small
OKA Little Big
Too Big
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 2 2 2HTC Touch Pro 1 1 4Apple iPhone 2 4
Samsung Omnia 3 3Samsung Omnia (Alt. Text Entry) 1 5
Too LightA Little Light
OKA Little Heavy
Too Heavy
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 1 4 1HTC Touch Pro 2 4Apple iPhone 2 3 1
Samsung Omnia 6
Too SmallA Little Small
OKA Little Big
Too Big
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 5 1HTC Touch Pro 6Apple iPhone 2 4
Samsung Omnia 6
Lovely NiceNo So Good
Ugly
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 5 1HTC Touch Pro 6Apple iPhone 1 5
Samsung Omnia 6
Definitely ProbablyPossibly Not
No
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 1 2 3HTC Touch Pro 3 2 1Apple iPhone 4 1 1
Samsung Omnia 2 2 1 1
7. What do you think of the weight of the phone?
8. What do you think of the size of the phone?
9. What do you think of the appearance of the phone?
10. Would you use this phone?
4. How confident would you be that you could press the intended
5. What do you think of the force required to press the keyboard buttons?
6. What do you think of the size of the keyboard buttons?
Table 1 ‐ MH@A Phone Handset Evaluation Questionnaire Overview
CertainFairly Certain
UnsureVery
Unsure
1. How easy is it to see what is shown on the screen?
2. How easy is it to find each of the main (control) buttons?
3. What do you think of the size of the main (control) buttons?
main (control) button?
Following group evaluation of each handset, members were each asked to individually rank the phones in preference, with 1 being most preferable to 4 the least, to use during the field trail. The results of this are shown in Table 2.
Preference (lowest number)
1 2 3 4 5 6Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 4 3.5 4 3.5 3.5 3 21.5HTC Touch Pro 3 3.5 3 3.5 3.5 4 20.5Apple iPhone 1 1 2 1 2 2 9Samsung Omnia 2 2 1 2 1 1 9
Table 2 ‐ Users Ranking of Each Handset
Participant
Han
dset
Most of the Group felt that the Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 and HTC Touch Pro were very similar handsets, and they did not differentiate much between them. There was a general consensus that both were too thick and heavy. There are more detailed comments later on in this document.
The Samsung Omnia was the most preferred handset for a number of reasons. It was the lightest phone evaluated. Although it has quite a large footprint, it is very slim and allowed for the largest Windows Mobile based display evaluated. The Omnia was also much liked due to the array of options available for text entry.
In Question 6 of Table 1, there are 2 entries for the Samsung Omnia. This has been shown to highlight the vast difference in ease of use between the standard portrait QWERTY keyboard and the various other keyboards available. Some of the various text entry methods can be seen in Figure 1. Users who already used mobile phones, and had used SMS text messaging mostly preferred using the standard numeric keypad layout for text entry. Nearly all found the standard portrait QWERTY keyboard too small for accurate text entry, both those who did not already use mobile phones and SMS messaging liked either the QWERTY keyboard in landscape mode, or portrait mode with 2 letters per button (which requires a double tap for the 2nd letter in the button).
F
Teop
Samsun
Figure 1:
ext Entry ptions on ng Omnia
5.3
5.3.1
•
•
•
5.3.2
•
•
•
Other Com
Sony Ericsso
A black XPERusers found of the XPERI
Some users the screen is
The higher rsome on‐scr
Apple iPhon
On‐screen teapplication.
Although thgroup, two touchscreen
There was Some users could get us
mments Mad
on XPERIA X1
RIA was usedthe keys verIA.
found the tos slid open, a
resolution ofreen elemen
ne –
ext in ‘Notes The text siz
e touchscreeusers com
n.
mixed feelinliked this ve
sed to it.
de by User
1 –
d in the evalry hard to se
op row of keand these ke
f the screen ts hard to re
s’ applicationze could not
en was genemmented on
ngs about hery much, ot
Group
uation. Theee. This is the
eys on the keeys very hard
compared wead.
n was very smbe changed.
erally found tn how stylu
ow the iPhothers found
keyboard ise same with
eyboard too d to press bec
with the sim
mall compar This can be
to be very acuses could
one automait a bit conf
s sliver with sboth the silv
close the topcause of this
ilarly sized H
ed with Wine seen in Figu
ccurate and not be use
atically correfusing, but th
silver buttonver and blac
p of the devis.
HTC Touch P
ndows Mobileure 2.
easy to use ed with the
ected mistyphought with
TextNotes
on
ns. Some k models
ice when
ro led to
e ‘Notes’
with the e iPhone
ped text. practice
Figure 2:
t size on the s application n the iPhone
5.3.3
•
5.3.4
•
5.4
In the otout, thethem to
• • •
These a
Samsung Om
As mentionetype accuratopens / closcan lead to i
Other Comm
The large texscreen text fThis comme
Other Regi
ther regions e user group use. In gen
Large Screen
Large Keybo
Large Button
are similar co
mnia
ed previouslytely, and othses the keyboinadvertently
ments –
xt option onfor most useent should be
ons
involved witps were askeeral, they wo
n
oard
ns
omments to t
y, the standaher keyboardoard is alwayy closing the
the Windowers. An exame considered
th the projeced about whould like –
those made
ard portrait Qds were mucys in the mide keyboard w
ws Mobile ‘Nmple of this c during the d
ct, although hat features
by the North
QWERTY keych more suitaddle of the bowhile typing.
otes’ applicaan be seen odevelopmen
a study withwould mak
hern Ireland
yboard was table. The soottom touch
ation is the idon the HTC Tt of the hand
h physical deve the hands
User Group
too small andoft touch buth bar of optio
deal size of oTouch Pro in dset prototy
vices was noset most suit
.
TNo
d hard to tton that ons. This
on‐Figure 3. pe.
ot carried table for
Figure 3
Text size on thtes applicatioon Window
Mobile handset
3:
he on ws 6 ts
Appenddix 1 – Evaluuation Queestionnaire
DELIVERABLE 3.6
05-10-2009
23 (27)
www.myhealth-age.eu
APPENDIXII‐MyHealth@AgeUserAcceptanceTestinNorwayThesmartphoneswereavailablefortheprojectmembersinthebeginningofJune2009.Theprojectmembers tried out the smart phone and the applications that were available (safety alarm andprescribedhealthcare)foraweek.TheseniorswereinvitedtoameetingatNCTonFriday,20thJune.Thesmartphoneswerehandedouttotheseniorsandprojectmembersgaveapresentationofthebasicsfunctionsofthephone(SIM,batterycharging,turnthephoneon/off,makephonecallsandmake SMS) and of the MyHealth@Age applications that were accessible. The seniors tried toactivate the different functions and projectmemberswere helping and answering questions. Themanualswere handed out and the seniors got a list of activities that they should try to performbeforethenextmeeting.Theyalsogotalistofcriteriatoevaluatethesmartphone.TheseniorsmetatNCTon29thJunetopresenttheirevaluation.Duringthetestperiodtheseniorshadnotbeenabletoaccesstheprescribedhealthcarewebpage.Theevaluationofthewebpageisbasedonthefirstmeeting(20thJune)andtheprojectmember’suseoftheprescribedhealthcare.Theseniors:TheMyHealth@Ageapplications:1) Thealarmwasfunctioning2) TheMyHealth@Ageapplicationsiseasytouse3) Aneedofashortermanual(withbasicfunctions)Thesmartphone:1) Thesymbolsontheedgearehardtonotice2) Theperiodbeforethelightonthescreenfadesawayistoshort3) Thepenistosmall(thin)4) Thehardkeypadisnotnecessary5) Thetelephonemenusaretoodifficulttounderstand6) Thewaytomovebetweenprogramsisdifficulttounderstand7) BatterytimeistoshortTheprojectmembers:TheMyHealth@Ageapplications:1) Unabletousedecimals(comma)whenfillingindata(glucosesetc)2) WaranmustbealteredtoINRorMarevaninNorwayThesmartphone:1) Badsoundquality/lowvolumeifyoudon’tholdthephoneintherightposition.2) Thetelephoneisheavy3) Longtimefromit’sputonbeforeit’sready4) Thekeypadsaresmall5) DifficulttochangebatteryandSIM6) Thetelephoneissometimeslockedanditisimpossibletoturnoffandonwithouthavingto
removetheSIM.
DELIVERABLE 3.6
05-10-2009
24 (27)
www.myhealth-age.eu
MyHealth@AgeThese are the result from the user acceptance test. The seniors were not able to activate theprescribedhealthcareduringthetestperiod.
1.1.1 Telephone
ID Title Accepted Comment
Usersshouldbeabletomake phone calls withthedevice.
Yes
Usersshouldbeabletosend and receive SMSwiththedevice.
Yes
The users should beable to navigate to themain menus after 5trials
The users should beabletogetthedeviceinphone mode bypressingonebutton.
Yes
Theusershouldbeableto insert new phonenumber in Contact andbeablefindnumbersinContactafter5trials‐
Yes
The users should beable to start theMyHealth@Ageapplicationsbypressingnot more than twobuttons.
Yes
The users should beable to access theMyHealth@Age menuwith two clicks fromanywhere on thedevice.
Yes Users can start theapplicationsbyclickingthe“Xpanel”button,and then choosing theMyHealth@Agepanel.
Thedeviceshouldwarnthe user if the batterylevelislow.
Yes The user is warned by soundandtext
DELIVERABLE 3.6
05-10-2009
25 (27)
www.myhealth-age.eu
Theusershouldbeableto configure thiswarning, to be a textmessageorasound.
1.1.2 Mobile safety alarm
SenderofalarmID Title Accepted Comment Theuser should be able to start
thealarmfromthedevice.Yes
Theuser should be able to startthealarmfromthefallsensor.
Theusershouldbeabletocancelan alarm within 1 minute ofstartingit.
Yes
When the alarm is activated thedevice should make sounds andvibrate. This should also happenif the sound on the device isturnedoff.
Yes
Theusershouldbenotifiedwhenthealarmisconfirmed.
Yes
The device should display statusfor fall sensor, battery, fallsensor battery, alarm centreconnectionGPS.
Yes
The device should be able toreceive signals from the fallsensorifit’swithin10meters.
When the alarm menu isactivated, the telephone shouldbeon(andnot“gotosleep”)thewholetime.
ReceiverofalarmFallsensor
DELIVERABLE 3.6
05-10-2009
26 (27)
www.myhealth-age.eu
1.1.3 Prescribed health care
PrescribedhealthcareID Title Accepted Comment Theuser should be able to view
thereportedvalues.Yes
Theusershouldbealertedwhentheygetmessagesfromahealthcare worker in the prescribedhealthcaresystem.
Theusershouldbenotifiedwhenit is time to do PrescribedHealthcareactivities.
Theusershouldbeabletonotifythat he/she has performed thePrescribedHealthcareactivity.
Yes
Theusersshouldbeabletowriteapatientdiary.
Yes
Thedeviceshouldneverhavetouse more than 10 seconds toloadanewpage.
The web pages used inPrescribed Healthcare should beavailable at least 90 % of thetime.
No The users have not been able to access theprescribedhealthcareduringthetestperiod(9days)
The device should place thecursor in the text fieldautomatically when showing afieldthatneedstobefilledin.
No
PrescribedhealthcarecommunicationwiththeGPID Title Accepted Comment The user should be able to
reportuseofmedication.Yes
TheusershouldbeabletosendandreceivemessagestotheGP
Receivenottested
The user should be able toreportbloodpressure.
Yes
The user should be able toreportbloodglucose.
Yes
The user should be able toreportINRvalues.
Yes
The user should be able toreportECG.
Yes
The user should be able to fill No
DELIVERABLE 3.6
05-10-2009
27 (27)
www.myhealth-age.eu
invalueswithcomma/dot(e.g.102,3)
PrescribedhealthcarecommunicationwithnursesetcID Title Accepted Comment The user should be able to
send and receive messages tonursesetc.
Receivenottested
The user should be able toreportstepcountervalues.
Yes
The user should be able toreportpulsemetervalues.
Yes
The user should be able toreportweight.
Yes
1.1.4 Social networking
ID Title Accepted Comment Users should be able to find
their GPS position using thedevice.
Theusersshouldbeabletoseethepositionofotherusersonamap.
Theusersshouldbeabletogetthe location (address) of otherusersinamessage.
The user should be able todefine groups forcommunication (culture,walking,discussionetc)
The users should be able tosend SMS messages topredefinedgroups.
Theusersshouldbeabletosettheirstatusasnotavailable.