Metrication and SI Units* - PediatricsBase units are multiplied and divided to form derived units...
Transcript of Metrication and SI Units* - PediatricsBase units are multiplied and divided to form derived units...
Committee on Hospital Care
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS 659
Metrication and SI Units*
Because of the increasing international use of the
SI system (International System of Units) in med-
icine, the Committee on Hospital Care has written
this statement to familiarize pediatricians with this
concept. The current state of the system, its den-
vation, purported advantages, and controversial as-
pects are described; and the Committee has made
specific recommendations for consideration regard-
ing its future use and development.
BACKGROUND
The British Imperial System of Weights used in
the United States today derives from a variety of
ancient cultures. A Roman contribution is the use
of the awkward number 12 as a base. Royal decree
established the yard as the distance from the tip of
the nose to the end of the thumb of King Henry I.
The inch was based on the size of three grains of
barley “dry and round.” Equally illogically derived
units evolved to eventually form the irrational Eng-
lish “system.”
The metric system with its “base-lO” or “deci-
mal” system derived its units of mass and volume
from its units of length, thus correlating its basic
units to each other. The need for further refinement
of metrics and a single worldwide and interdiscipli-
nary system of measurements led to the develop-
ment of the International System of Units (le Sys-
t#{232}meInternational d’Unit#{233}s) with the international
abbreviation “SI.” This is sometimes referred to as
“the modern metric system” and is said to complete
the process of metnication.2
Seventeen countries, including the United States,
signed the Metre Convention in 1870. This led to
the establishment of the International Bureau of
* Abbreviations used in Pediatrics currently follow the Style-
book/Editorial Manual of the American Medical Association.
Abbreviations used in this article are slightly different from the
Stylebook.
PEI)IATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 1980 by the
American Academy of Pediatrics.
Weights and Measures at S#{232}vres, France, which
acts as an international standards reference labo-
ratory and as the permanent secretariat for the
Metre Convention. The General Conference on
Weights and Measures, the diplomatic organization
made up of adherents to the Convention (now in-
cluding 41 member countries), is the ultimate au-
thority on the definition of units. In 1960 the Gen-
eral Conference standardized metric units into the
simplified and logical system known as SI. Furtherrefinements have been made by the General Con-
ference on four subsequent occasions. ‘ The present
structure of the SI is likely to be the permanent
one.�
In parallel with the developments on the gener-
alized use of SI units, recommendations for the
standardized reporting of clinical laboratory data
based on SI were proposed by the Commission on
Clinical Chemistry (CCC) of the International Un-
ion of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and
the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry
(IFCC).4
In recent years, the major industrial nations of
the world, with the exception of the United States,
have been using the metric system or converting to
its use. The United States has been an “island in
the metric sea.” The British Commonwealth coun-
tries with whom we shared the pounds-quarts-yards
system for so long have all converted to metric.
Canada has an unofficial goal of being metric by
1980. Eventually, the Congress of the United States
passed the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 stating,
“It is therefore declared that the policy of the
United States shall be to coordinate and plan the
increasing use of the metric system.” Furthermore,
the Act states, “. . . the term ‘metric system of mea-
surement’ means the International System of
Units.”5 This is to be done on a voluntary basis.
Industry is becoming increasingly involved in
metric conversion with the realization that the
United States cannot be competitive on the inter-
national scene without using metrics. Schools in the
by guest on March 26, 2020www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
1980
19811982
660 PEDIATRICS Vol. 65 No. 3 March 1980
United States have begun teaching SI as the pni-
mary measurement system.’
In Finland, Norway, and Sweden, the use of SI is
compulsory in medical laboratories. Table 1 lists
the years by which a phased introduction of SI will
be or has been completed in various countries.
SI SYSTEM
SI is a system of “base units” and “derived units”
and their interrelationships. Seven base units and
two supplementary units have been adopted (Table
2). Each unit can be defined in specific terms. For
example, the mole is the amount of substance that
contains as many elementary entities as there are
atoms in 0.012 kg of carbon 12. Base units are
multiplied and divided to form derived units (Table
3). For example, the unit for force, the newton, is
derived from three base units according to the
expression m � kg . �2#{149} Coherence is the derivation
of a unit from a base unit without the use of a
TABLE 1 . Year of Introduction or Anticipated
Introduction of SI Units
Year Country
1970 Netherlands
1971 Denmark, Finland1974 Australia
1975 United Kingdom
1976 New Zealand, South Africa, Sweden
1977 Norway1978 Federal Republic of Germany
1979 Czechoslovakia, Democratic Republic of Ger-many
Hungary, Italy
Japan, Switzerland, YugoslaviaEcuador
TABLE 2. SI Base Units
Quantity Name Symbol
Length Meter (metre)* mMass Kilogram kgTime Second sElectric current Ampere AThermodynamic temper- Kelvin K
aturet
Amount of substance Mole molLuminous intensity Candela cd
Supplementary UnitsPlane angle Radian radSolid angle Steradian sr
* Both spellings acceptable.
t The Celsius temperature scale (formerly called centi-grade) is used for most medical and commercial purposes.
The Kelvin (the unit for thermodynamic temperature) isthe SI unit for temperature. Although their scale origins
differ, the degree Celsius equals the Kelvin in magnitude;
thus, a rise in body temperature of 1.0 K is equivalent to
a rise of 1.0 C. 0 C is defined as 273.15 K, thus 98.6 F = 37
C = 310.15 K.
factor. Noncoherent units are derived from the base
units but contain a factor, eg, the liter (L, recom-
mended symbol for the liter in the United States)
equals the decimeter cubed (dm’). Table 4 shows
the prefixes that denote multiples of SI units.
Although mass concentration (gIL) and sub-
stance concentration (mol/L) are both included in
the SI system,7 there are certain advantages to
recording in substance concentration. By reporting
data as we do now, the apparent quantities of
different materials may be misrepresented. Corn-
pounds with a high molecular mass might seem to
have more molecules present as compared with
those of lower molecular weight. Furthermore, cer-
tam biologic relations between blood constituents
may be made clear when measurement is on the
basis of their relative number. Such relations may
be masked by usage of mass concentration but may
be better visualized in molar terms. For example,
an unconjugated biirubin concentration might be
0.4 mg/dL and the serum albumin, 4.0 g/dL. The
concentration of biirubin might seem to be ‘/i,xx of
that of albumin. In molar terms, however, there is
only a 100-fold difference. The same concentrations
are 6.8 and 620 �imol/L, respectively. A serum bili-
rubin concentration of 20 mg/dL, which is a level of
clinical importance in neonatology, is 340 imol/L,
or more than half the molar concentration of the
albumin in this example.” It becomes obvious why
a small change in compounds bound to albumin
may result in displacement of bilirubin or other
compounds from their binding sites on the albumin
molecule. Another example is the electrolytes, so-
dium, potassium, and chloride, whose interrelations
have become more apparent since they have been
reported in milliequivalent units. (The new metric
system molecular SI unit is numerically the same
as the univalent charged ion when expressed as
milliequivalents.) True ionic balance in serum is
difficult to understand when constituents are re-
ported in different terms, eg, the foregoing ions are
reported in mEq/L, whereas the divalent ion, cal-
cium and magnesium, are still often expressed as
mg/100 ml. SI would impose consistency.
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Certain stated advantages of metric conversion
are compelling. Scientists from all fields and of all
nationalities might eventually communicate in the
same units of measure. The increase in ease and
precision of scientific communication and eventual
avoidance of misunderstanding and error by inter-
national agreement on terminology would be enor-
mous. SI has the advantage of being logical, sys-
tematic, international, and interdisciplinary.9 It has
been suggested that SI would eventually replace
by guest on March 26, 2020www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
Quantity Symbol
Ohm
TABLE 3. Some SI Derived Units
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS 661
Area
Volume
VelocityWave number
Density, mass density
Concentration (amount of
substance)
Activity (radioactive)
Specific volume
Luminance
FrequencyForce
PressureEnergy, quantity of heat,
workPower
Electric potential, potential
difference, electromotiveforce
Electric resistance
Name
Square meter
Cubic meterMeter per second1 per meterKilogram per cubic me-
terMole per cubic meter
1 per secondCubic meter per kilo-
gramCandela per square me-
terHertzNewton
Pascal
Joule
WattVolt
rn’rn/s
kg/rn’
rnol/m’
s-i
rn’/kg
cd/rn2
Hz =
N = rn.kg.s2
Pa = N/rn2 = m ‘ . kg . sJ = N.m = rn2.kg.s2
W = J/S = rn2.kg.s
V = W/A = rn2.kg.s’.A’
�2 = V/A = rn2.kg.s’.A2
TABLE 4. SI Prefixes
Factor Prefix
Name Symbol
Factor Prefix
Name Symbol
10’�exa- E 10 “ atto- ai0’� peta- P 10’� fernto- f1012 tera- T 10�2 pico- p
i0� giga- G 10” nano- n
io�’ mega- M 10� rnicro-
i��’ kilo- k 1(1’ rnilli- m102 hecto- h 102 centi- c
101 deca- da 10’ deci- d
our present, and often arbitrary, collection of med-
ical units.
A potential disadvantage is danger to the patient
by possible error engendered through unfamiliarity.
Furthermore, SI is another change thrust on the
physician, who is already overburdened with sci-
entific advances and must commit to memory a
new set of normal values. Also, the logistic consid-
erations of recalibration, new report forms, and
reeducation are considerable.”
SPECIAL PROBLEMS
Two of the SI-derived units relating to medicine
are unknown to most clinicians.” The existence of
a clear-cut advantage to medicine is debatable. It
has been recommended that the joule replace the
calorie in nutrition and dietetics. One calorie equals
4.184 J; therefore, a 1,000-calorie diet equals a 4.18
kilojoule diet. There is dispute about its adoption
in the United States, although there is support for
its use in Great Britain.’2 Equally unfamiliar is the
pascal, the SI unit of pressure. Blood pressures are
now recorded in millimeters of mercury (or “torr”).
The pascal (kg - m ‘ . �2, or the newton per square
meter) is proposed to replace all other pressure
units. Although the pascal is too small for conven-
tional clinical use, the kilopascal (10’ pascal) has an
appropriate magnitude. One kPa is equal to 7.5006
mm Hg; therefore, a blood pressure of 130/80 mm
Hg would be approximately 17/11 kPa. Objections
to its use have been summarized.”
An especially difficult problem is the measure-
ment of enzymatic activity. The previously intro-
duced international unit is defined as the amount
of enzyme that will catalyze the transformation of
1 micromole of substrate per minute under standard
conditions. Acceptance of this unit has been slow,
and many traditional units are still used. To con-
form with SI, a new base unit for enzymatic activity
named the katal ( 1 mole per second) has recently
been proposed, but it is not an official recommen-
dation. A wide variety of methods and conditions
are used to measure enzymes, such as pH and
temperature. Attempts are being made at the inter-
national level to standardize assay conditions. Ad-
ditionally, the mass and purity of proteins are com-
monly unknown. One country suggested that no
change be made in units of tests already being
performed. As new assays are introduced, moles per
second (or a submultiple) might be used.’4
RECEPTION AND EXPERIENCE IN MEDICINE
Positive reactions from the medical community
have included the World Health Organization’s rec-
by guest on March 26, 2020www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
662 PEDIATRICS Vol. 65 No. 3 March 1980
ommendation that SI be adopted by medicine
worldwide. In 1976 an international symposium
sponsored by the World Association of Societies of
Pathology, the United States National Bureau of
Standards, and the American Medical Association
also endorsed SI.�’ The Journal of the American
Medical Association has committed itself toward
progressive usage of SI,’� as has the American
Journal of Clinical Pathology.’6 The Annals of
Internal Medicine announced a positive editorial
policy regarding SI, but it intends to maintain a
“balance between innovation and compre-
‘7
A study committee of the Massachusetts Medical
Society, charged to consider the principle that
“changes in well established units be made only
when definite advantages to the physician or the
patient have been clearly demonstrated,” suggested
that there be “no abrupt change in the current use
of mass concentration.” ‘� More recently, the Coun-
cil on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical
Association “advises that the AMA proceed to de-
velop a wide concensus on how broadly SI units
should be adopted by medical groups as well as
medically oriented groups: nurses, biomedical sci-
entists, laboratory technicians, other paramedical
groups, and manufacturers of medical and labora-
tory equipment. It suggests a broad educational
effort, once new units have been generally decided
upon, to disseminate the information widely before
a prearranged transition date. For a year or more
prior to the transition date, new units would be
used parenthetically with the comparable old units
in all AMA and other cooperating publications. For
at least a year after the transition date, the old units
will be used parenthetically with the new.
Until the above arrangements can be brought to frui-
tion, the Council makes the following recommendations
regarding the use of SI units in clinical chemistry:
1. That the use of mass concentration units (wgt/vol)
be retained by medical laboratories until it is shown that
a change to mole concentrations will improve patient care
(diagnosis, treatment, or follow-up), or prove a significant
advantage with respect to laboratory measurement tech-
nique.
2. That no abrupt changes in the current use of massconcentrations, or in mihiequivalent units for certain
electrolytes, be undertaken until an overall plan and
schedule has been agreed upon by representative medi-
cally oriented groups and appropriate councils of the
American Medical
SI would likely be much more readily accepted
by physicians if they could better monitor patients,
diagnose diseases, or treat patients. The proponents
of the system have described theoretical advantages
without demonstrating actual benefits. What has
the reported experience with SI been among phy-
sicians? In the Netherlands, 53 senior specialists in
internal medicine, who used SI for two to five years,
were polled. Fifteen said they grasped the units in
three months, 20 needed from three months to one
year, and 18 required longer. More importantly, 47
did not think substance concentration enabled them
to provide better treatment. Eighteen felt the use
of SI units provided them with better insight into
chemical processes. In Canada, after six months,
16% of a medical staff no longer converted SI to
traditional units, and 78% occasionally did � It is
vital to further document advantages and disadvan-
tages actually experienced in those countries using
SI.
MEDICAL LITERATURE
Contemporary medical literature in the United
States has fallen “out of step” with many of the
prominent European medical journals, which now
report in SI units. Many readers in the United
States are unprepared to interpret data recorded in
unfamiliar terms. Likewise, non-Americans are now
beginning to lose familiarity with conventional
units. This situation is intolerable and detrimental
to progress in medicine, and it eventually will ad-
versely affect patient care. But it is avoidable.
Medical journals both here and abroad should
publish data in recommended SI and traditional
units.2’ Appropriate conversion data could be in-
cluded. The educational benefit, as well as clarity
of communication, would be great. Medical person-
nel in this country could begin thinking in new
terminology as well as begin testing the advantages
of SI. Hopefully, a dual reporting system would
avoid confusion and inaccuracy, as well as the in-
ability to interpret data, while promoting interna-
tional medical communication. Most importantly,
by familiarizing ourselves with SI, the members of
the United States’ medical community might then
participate more fully in the further refinement of
the system. We could assist in perfecting and ex-
tending the system in a manner acceptable to Amer-
ican medical scientists rather than having a system
that is completed elsewhere thrust on us.
The disadvantage to dual reporting would be the
extra time demanded of authors to supply data in
two forms. However, this is not an unreasonable
demand of careful investigators. Dual reporting
would imply no firm commitment to SI in its en-
tirety, but rather a willingness to familiarize and
participate in the process of international agree-
ment. Only through such familiarity will physicians
be able to test the declared logic and beneficial
qualities of the system. Several helpful references
for authors and readers are available.’9 14,22
by guest on March 26, 2020www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
COMMITTEE ON HOSPITAL CARE, 1978-79
Arno R. Hohn, MD, Chairman
Alfred B. Amler, MD
Paul S. Bergeson, MD
Harvey R. Gold, MD
Stewart L. Griggs, MD
Gerald B. Shattuck, MD
Stanford A. Singer, MD
Edwin Ide Smith, MD
Willis A. Wingert, MD
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS 663
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PRESENT
Suggestions have been made in hospitals for con-
version to the metric system.24 The Committee on
Hospital Care joins in supporting hospital adoption
of the metric system in the following hospital areas:
( 1 ) the recording of all patient measurements, in-
cluding temperature (in Celsius scale), body mass
(in kilograms), and linear dimensions (in meters or
subunits); (2) internal ordering and administering
of all drugs and medication (in mass concentration
for the present); (3) food service and dietary for-
mulas (the calorie should be retained for the pres-
ent); (4) all reports and records; and (5) external
ordering and purchasing.
Also encouraged (although not an SI term) is the
keeping of time records on the 24-hour clock to
avoid confusion between AM and PM notations. Ad-
vantages to hospitals have been listed and proce-
dures for hospital implementation suggested, in-
cluding involvement of boards of directors, use of
target dates, and training programs.2’ Successful
hospital experiences have been documented.2’27
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE
The Committee on Hospital Care recommends
that the American Academy of Pediatrics join with
the American Medical Association and other inter-
ested organizations such as the American National
Metric Council to further clarify biomedical issues
concerning SI. Among the specific issues which
should be examined are the following: (1) dual
reporting by American medical journals; (2) reten-
tion of the term pH, with simultaneous reporting of
hydrogen ion concentration in nanomoles per liter;
(3) use of substance versus mass concentration or
a combination of the two; (4) use of millimoles per
liter for hemoglobin concentration versus grams per
deciliter; (5) use of freezing point depression versus
retention of reporting of osmolality in traditional
terms; (6) use of the pascal versus millimeter of
mercury; (7) use of the joule versus calorie; (8)
encouragement of academic centers to use and
teach SI; and (9) use of the katal if it is officially
recommended for the unit of enzyme activity.
Once agreement has been reached on desirable
SI uses, programs of orderly adoption should be
implemented.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Committee is grateful for invaluable input by the
following individuals in the preparation of the manu-
script: H. Peter Lehmann, PhD, Bradley E. Copeland,
MD, and Alan K. Done, MD.
REFERENCES
1. Brief History of Measurement Systems with a Chart of the
Modernized Metric System. National Bureau of Standards,
Special Publication 304A, revised August 1976
2. Baron DN: SI units. Br Med �J 4:509, 1974
3. Lehmann HP: Metrication of clinical laboratory data in SI
units. Am J Clin Pathol 65:2, 1976
4. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Com-mission on Quantities and Units, Clinical Chemistry and
International Federation of Clinical Chemistry: Expert panelon quantities and units. List of quantities in clinical chem-istry recommendation 1973. Pure Appi Chem 37:519, 549,
19745. Metric Conversion Act of1975, Public Law 94-168. 89 Stat.
1007
6. McGehan FP: America joins a metric world. Dimensions(National Bureau of Standards) 60:6, February 1976
7. Copeland BE: SI units: A clarification. Am J (‘tin Pathol
65:20, 1976
8. Young DS: Standardized reporting of laboratory data: The
desirability of using SI units. N Engi .1 Med 29():368, 1974
9. Lippert H, Lehmann HP: SI Units in Medicine: An Intro-duction to the International System of Units with (‘onver-
sion Tables and Normal Ranges. Baltimore, Urban and
Schwarzenberg, 1978
10. Shepard I)A: The metric system, the international system
of units (SI) and medicine. Can Med Assoc J 112:799, 1975
11. Huth El: Metricating medicine: How fast, how far? N Engi
J Med 290:398, 1974
12. The Royal Society: Metric units, conversion factors and
nomenclature in nutritional and food sciences: Report of the
subcommittee on metrication of the British National Corn-
mittee for Nutritional Sciences. Proc Nutr Soc 31 :239, Sep-
tember 1972
13. Rose JC: Pressures on the millimeter of mercury. N EngI J
Med298:1361, 1978
14. Pannall PR: The introduction of SI units and the standard-ization of laboratory reports: Recommendations of the South
African As.sociation of Clinical Biochemists. S Afr Med �J
50:1539, 1976
15. Barclay WR: Standardizing units to measurement�s. JAMA236:1981, 1976
16. Beeler MS: Metrication from crawl to walk. Am J Clin
Pathol 65:19, 1976
17. Huth EJ: SI for metric medicine? Ann Intern Med 76:322,
1972
18. Copeland BE, Beautyman W. Bradley R. et al: Study corn-
mittee to evaluate changes in units of clinical chemistry
tests. N Engi J Med 293:43. 1975
19. Report E of the Council on Scientific Affairs of the American
Medical Association (A-78): Adoption of International Sys-
tern of (SI) Units for clinical chemistry. American Medical
Association House of I)elegates Proceedings, St Louis, �June
18-22, 1978, p 291
20. Karnauchow PN, Suvanto L: Experience with SI units in
biochemistry. Can Med Assoc J 114:533, 1976
21. Young 1)5: SI units for clinical laboratory data. .JAMA
240:1618, 1978
by guest on March 26, 2020www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
664 PEDIATRICS Vol. 65 No. 3 March 1980
22. Young 1)5: Normal laboratory values” (case records of the Canadian teaching hospital. Can Med Assoc J 1 14:536, 1976Massachusetts General Hospital) in SI units. N EngI J Med 25. Rennie G: Yes! to metric system conversion. Hosp Prog
292:795, 1975 58:36, 1977
23. Frost I)V, Helgren FJ, Sokol LF: Metric Handbook for 26. Timmerman MR, Lobel J: Beating the deadline: Converting
Hospitals, ed 2. Boulder, Colorado, US Metric Association, to metric system now. Hosp Prog 58:72, 1977
Inc. 1975 27. Weissman ME: No more inches, no more pounds. Hospitals
24. Itiaba K, Crawhall JC: Metrication on the move in a large 51:103, 1977
DR WILLIAM A. ALCOTT ON MATERNAL DOSING AND DRUGGING AS THEMAJOR CAUSE OF INFANT MORTALITY IN 1854
Among the most outspoken of American health reformers of the mid-nine-
teenth century was Dr William A. Alcott of Boston. The health reformers
offered an alternative to a public dissatisfied with the heroic practice of most
physicians of this period by emphasizing that the individual had it in his or her
own power to keep all members of the family in good health by forgoing most
of the drugs prescribed by allopathic physicians.
Alcott’ was particularly concerned with the huge extent of infant mortality
caused by “maternal dosing and drugging.” He wrote:
But whether ignorant or somewhat enlightened, the vast majority of our mothersdoctor, more or less, their own children. At least, if they refuse to call it doctoring, theygive them a vast amount of small elixirs, cordials, etc. The closets of not a few house-keepers are a complete apothecary’s shop. They may, it is true, have smaller parcels thenthe regular apothecary; but they have almost as great an assortment. And they not onlykeep it; they administer it. They may not intend it; they do not mean to give much;sometimes they really think they do not give much. But it comes to pass, in the courseof the year, that much is given by somebody; and I greatly fear that the mother must beheld responsible for it. ...
But now for the consequences of this maternal dosing; for this it is with which medicalmen have chiefly to do. Next to bad food and wretched cookery, as I have beforeintimated, this error is productive of more sickness and premature death than any other.No physician knows what to do with a sick child, who has been thus tampered with. ...
He may indeed guess a little better than others; but even he will often guess wrong.Their first passages are irritated, and perhaps inflamed; and if it were possible to makethe right appliances either internally or externally, it would stifi puzzle the wisest headto know how to apportion the quantity so as to be more likely to do good than harm.Diseases, in these circumstances, as you know, are more apt to be severe and complicated,and the termination more likely to be fatal, especially if much medicine is used.
The worst remains to be told. As it is not always easy to trace the cause of severe,protracted or fatal infantile disease to maternal error, we not only contrive to kill, fromgeneration to generation, by thousands and tens of thousands; but we partly kill bymillions. . . . We bring on, gradually, some disease or other; or we render an inheriteddisease, which might have been mild, very severe, or early fatal; or we aggravate, by overdosing, the symptoms of acquired diseases from other causes.
Noted by T.E.C., Jr, MD
REFERENCE
1. Alcott WA: Mortality among children. Boston Med Sung J 51:260, 1854
by guest on March 26, 2020www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
1980;65;659Pediatrics Gerald B. Shattuck, Stanford A. Singer, Edwin Ide Smith and Willis A. Wingert
Arno R. Hohn, Alfred B. Amler, Paul S. Bergeson, Harvey R. Gold, Stewart L. Griggs,Metrication and SI Units
ServicesUpdated Information &
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/65/3/659including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Permissions & Licensing
http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtmlentirety can be found online at: Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its
Reprintshttp://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtmlInformation about ordering reprints can be found online:
by guest on March 26, 2020www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
1980;65;659Pediatrics Gerald B. Shattuck, Stanford A. Singer, Edwin Ide Smith and Willis A. Wingert
Arno R. Hohn, Alfred B. Amler, Paul S. Bergeson, Harvey R. Gold, Stewart L. Griggs,Metrication and SI Units
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/65/3/659the World Wide Web at:
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on
Copyright © 1980 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 1073-0397. American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007.been published continuously since 1948. Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has
by guest on March 26, 2020www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from