Methodology – Rescue 3 (UK) Study
description
Transcript of Methodology – Rescue 3 (UK) Study
Methodology – Rescue 3 (UK) Study
• Real World Conditions• Major manufacturers invited to participate• Representative body types• Qualitative and quantitative data• Two test configurations, solo and with
victim
Variables
• 5 PFDs from 4 manufacturers– Palm (two PFDs)– Peak UK– Nookie– Safequip
• Body type (5 test subjects plus a victim)• Low and high water velocity
– Currently undertaking low flow study
Determinants• Position of wearer in water (pillow wave
marker)• Stability (kinaesthetic feedback)• Quality of release (Commonality of
language)• Time for release• Force placed on system (Quantitatively)
Victim & Rescuer
Test Area
• Accurate dam release data obtainable from Environment Agency Wales
• Surveyed site (cross sectional area)• Does not present a hazard to recreational
boaters• Representative of low flow, but realistic
conditions
Flow Data
• Realistic water based rescue conditions• Testing occurred at approx 10 m3 s-1
• Equates to water velocity of 1.5 m s-1 mid flow (timed floating object)– Or walking pace– Just over 3mph– Slower than study in US (5mph)
Initial Findings
• Doubling load does not double force on system– Average of 170N solo and 190N with victim
Results
• Of approximately 100 releases in low flow conditions– 160N average force for largest test subject– 100N average force for our slightest subject– 2 release failures, requiring intervention– 10 faltering release (questionable reliability)
Comparison with US Study
Record US Wales
Velocity (m/s) 2.2 1.5
Av force solo (N)
333 170
Av force with victim (N)
453 190
PerformanceChest Harness
• Failed/faulty release factors include;• Harness tail folded (long tail)• Hot knife termination (blob of nylon)• Ambiguity of instructions from
manufacturer (too much friction)• Inconsistency of new materials (stiffness)• Age of material (used example)
Summary Canolfan Tryweryn Testing
• Force values determined are lower than EN 1402 (250 N)
• 2% chance of failed release during low flow
• 10 % chance of a questionable release• Outside of EN12402 range but highly
relevant to user (real world conditions)