Method Participants –In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males) –Mean age of 24 yrs (SD...

5
Method • Participants In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males) Mean age of 24 yrs (SD = 2.46; range = 20-28) • Materials Karolinska sleepiness scale (KSS), 9- point Likert scale Physiological sleepiness via EEG • Driving task: spectral analysis of O1-A2 • Nap break: C3-A2 scored for SOL and sleep staging Driving stimulus: Hazard Perception task • Hazard perception is the driving skill to anticipate that a traffic situation may result NRMA - ACT ROAD SAFETY TRUST

description

Results  30 min nap break KSS 1KSS 2 Hazard Perception driving simulation task 5 mins EEG Duration of driving Duration of driving: M = 36.1 mins (SD = 17.7; range = 15-76) No participant could have been judged to have fallen asleep by standard criteria NRMA - ACT ROAD SAFETY TRUST M = 6.65 M = 8.15 Sig increase No sig change Theta and alpha power levels

Transcript of Method Participants –In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males) –Mean age of 24 yrs (SD...

Page 1: Method Participants –In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males) –Mean age of 24 yrs (SD = 2.46; range = 20-28) Materials –Karolinska sleepiness.

Method• Participants

– In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males)– Mean age of 24 yrs (SD = 2.46; range = 20-28)

• Materials– Karolinska sleepiness scale (KSS), 9-point Likert scale– Physiological sleepiness via EEG

• Driving task: spectral analysis of O1-A2 • Nap break: C3-A2 scored for SOL and sleep staging

– Driving stimulus: Hazard Perception task • Hazard perception is the driving skill to anticipate that a traffic

situation may result in a crash or a near miss• Importantly it is the only driving skill that has a consistent

relationship with actual on-road crashes (i.e., criterion validity)

NRMA - ACT

ROAD SAFETY TRUST

Page 2: Method Participants –In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males) –Mean age of 24 yrs (SD = 2.46; range = 20-28) Materials –Karolinska sleepiness.

Method (2)• Procedure

– On testing days participants woke at 05:00– No caffeine or alcohol until completion of testing– Instructed to “Stop when you think you would be too

sleepy to drive safely on the road”• Design

– Experimental design: participants randomly assigned to the morning (09:00) or afternoon (14:00) start time

NRMA - ACT

ROAD SAFETY TRUST

30 min nap break

KSS 1 KSS 2

Hazard Perception driving simulation task

5 mins EEG 5 mins EEGDuration of driving

Page 3: Method Participants –In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males) –Mean age of 24 yrs (SD = 2.46; range = 20-28) Materials –Karolinska sleepiness.

Results

30 min nap break

KSS 1 KSS 2

Hazard Perception driving simulation task

5 mins EEG 5 mins EEG

Duration of driving

•Duration of driving: M = 36.1 mins (SD = 17.7; range = 15-76)

• No participant could have been judged to have fallen asleep by standard criteria

NRMA - ACT

ROAD SAFETY TRUST

M = 6.65

M = 8.15Sig increase

No sig changeTheta and alpha power levels

Page 4: Method Participants –In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males) –Mean age of 24 yrs (SD = 2.46; range = 20-28) Materials –Karolinska sleepiness.

Results (2)• Subjective sleepiness (KSS) detected an increase

in sleepiness levels• Physiological sleepiness (EEG) levels did not

change over the duration of drive• No circadian effects evident in any data source• Large variability of driving durations

Thirty minute nap break data (n = 23)

Note. SOL = sleep onset latency (min); REM = Rapid Eye Movement

Sleep time (% of total)SOL (SD) Duration (SD) Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 REM8.61 (7.78) 15.09 (8.11) 24.33 67.39 6.8 1.48 -

NRMA - ACT

ROAD SAFETY TRUST

Page 5: Method Participants –In total, 26 participants (19 females and 7 males) –Mean age of 24 yrs (SD = 2.46; range = 20-28) Materials –Karolinska sleepiness.

Commentsor

Questions?

[email protected]

NRMA - ACT

ROAD SAFETY TRUST