Method Development and Validation - CORESTA · 2018. 2. 16. · Method Development and Validation...
Transcript of Method Development and Validation - CORESTA · 2018. 2. 16. · Method Development and Validation...
Method Development and Validation of Selected Metals in e-Liquids
Jeremy BrownSeptember 22,2015 1
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Metals of interest Summary of analytical procedure Development issues Validation Off-the-shelf samples Future work
2
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Initial Metals of Interest:
Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd)Chromium (Cr) Nickel (Ni)Lead (Pb)
Mercury (Hg) Selenium (Se)
3
Copper (Cu) Cobalt (Co)Tin (Sn) Zinc (Zn)
Future Metals to Validate
Beryllium (Be) Silver (Ag)
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
E-Liquid (0.5 g)
HNO3 (3 mL) / H2O2 (3 mL)
Microwave Digestion
Dilute Sample Digest to Volume (50 mL)
ICP-MS Analysis
4
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
E-Liquid (0.5 g)
HNO3 (3 mL) / H2O2 (3 mL)
Microwave Digestion
Dilute Sample Digest to Volume (50 mL)
ICP-MS Analysis
Contamination
Potential Matrix Effects
Interferences• Isobaric• Inherent
5
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Use ultra pure acids and reagents Metal contamination◦ Tin in Hydrogen Peroxide◦ Other metals (95Mo + 16O = 111Cd)◦ Standards made in acetic acid
6
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Contamination
7
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Matrix Interferences
• Matrix Match
• Removal of solids
• Carbon build-up• High variability in sample reproducibility
• Reduce sample size• Filter samples• Increase the RF power
• Internal StandardsLarge amounts of carbon
8
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Auto-Sampler Nebulizer
TorchMass Spectrometer
CPU Processor
Aerosolize
Small Volume
Ionizes Sample
Signal
Inductively Coupled Plasma – Mass Spectrometer
Reaction Cell
9
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Element No. Isotopes Primary ConfirmationBeryllium 1 9 NAChromium 4 53 52Cobalt 1 59 NANickel 5 60 62Copper 2 65 63Zinc 5 67 66Arsenic 1 75 NASelenium 6 82 77Silver 2 107 109Cadmium 8 111 112Tin 10 118 117Mercury 7 202 200Lead 4 206/207/208 NA
Element No. Isotopes Primary ConfirmationBeryllium 1 9 NAChromium 4 53 52Cobalt 1 59 NANickel 5 60 62Copper 2 65 63Zinc 5 67 66Arsenic 1 75 NASelenium 6 82 77Silver 2 107 109Cadmium 8 111 112Tin 10 118 117Mercury 7 202 200Lead 4 206/207/208 NA
Element No. Isotopes Primary ConfirmationBeryllium 1 9 NAChromium 4 53 52Cobalt 1 59 NANickel 5 60 62Copper 2 65 63Zinc 5 67 66Arsenic 1 75 NASelenium 6 82 77Silver 2 107 109Cadmium 8 111 112Tin 10 118 117Mercury 7 202 200Lead 4 206/207/208 NA
10
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Arsenic Issue:40Ar + 35Cl 75As
75As + 16O 91AsO
Lead Issue:208Pb 206Pb + 207Pb + 208Pb
11
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Inherent interference issuesSelenium – Primary mass 80
40Ar40Ar – Major interference
Chromium – Primary mass 52
40Ar + 12C 52Cr
12
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Validation Parameters Linearity Accuracy Precision – Method/Instrument Intermediate Precision Specificity Robustness LOD/LOQ
13
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Three e-liquid solutions used throughout validation.
Solution Propylene Glycol (%) Glycerin (%)A 50 50B 80 20C 20 80
14
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Day 1 Day 2Metal Mass Slope r Slope rChromium 53 0.001969 0.9999 0.002017 0.9999Cobalt 59 0.020609 0.9999 0.021032 0.9999Nickel 60 0.004285 0.9999 0.004371 0.9999Copper 65 0.004656 0.9999 0.004888 0.9999Zinc 67 0.000364 0.9999 0.000401 0.9999Arsenic (As) 75 0.001294 0.9999 0.001274 0.9999Arsenic (AsO) 91 0.000116 0.9998 0.000114 0.9999Cadmium 111 0.001839 0.9999 0.001847 0.9999Tin 118 0.005800 0.9999 0.005932 0.9999Lead 208 0.016858 0.9999 0.016813 0.9999
Range: 0.1 – 200 ppbRegression: LinearOrigin: ExcludedWeighting: None
15
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Metal Mass Sc 45 Y 89 In 115 Bi 209Chromium 53 •Cobalt 59 •Nickel 60 •Copper 65 •Zinc 67 •Arsenic (As) 75 •Arsenic (AsO) 91 •Cadmium 111 •Tin 118 •Lead 208 •
Accurate quantitation requires multiple internal standards for the current metals of interest.
16
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Sample ID Sc 45 Y 89 In 115 Bi 209Blank 866717 1671291 1580766 8124480.1 ppb 881478 1687996 1605597 8322881.0 ppb 864342 1681397 1575342 8279815.0 ppb 851130 1631184 1537494 82309315.0 ppb 857718 1661638 1571568 82887925.0 ppb 847931 1653811 1556831 83125950.0 ppb 853913 1639294 1541287 827565100.0 ppb 846777 1607587 1536222 812046
Average 858751 1654275 1563138 824445Std. Dev. 11676 27135 24590 8012
%RSD 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.0
17
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Metal Mass Low Rec. (%) Mid Rec. (%) High Rec (%)Chromium 53 101.5 100.0 100.0Cobalt 59 99.5 98.6 98.6Nickel 60 95.8 97.1 98.4Copper 65 116.9 106.6 104.1Zinc 67 100.8 110.0 119.5Arsenic (As) 75 94.1 95.9 102.2Arsenic (AsO) 91 102.3 102.3 102.6Cadmium 111 92.8 92.8 98.5Tin 118 103.4 86.3 98.2Lead 208 115.0 106.2 102.5
Solution A (PG:GLY 1:1)3 Replicates
18
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Metal Mass 15 ng/mL Standard % RSDChromium 53 14.92 0.55Cobalt 59 15.00 0.37Nickel 60 14.89 0.43Copper 65 14.92 0.35Zinc 67 14.00 0.78Arsenic (As) 75 15.02 0.62Arsenic (AsO) 91 15.33 3.07Cadmium 111 14.86 1.05Tin 118 14.94 0.99Lead 208 15.05 1.82
6 Replicates
19
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Metal Mass % RSDChromium 53 2.00Cobalt 59 1.71Nickel 60 2.14Copper 65 1.62Zinc 67 5.35Arsenic (As) 75 7.11Arsenic (AsO) 91 2.26Cadmium 111 2.84Tin 118 4.60Lead 208 0.99
Solution A (PG:GLY 1:1)6 Replicates
20
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Analyst 1 / Day 1 Analyst 2 / Day 2Metal Mass SD % RSD SD %RSD RPD (%)
Chromium 52 0.082 5.48 0.079 6.17 14.2Chromium 53 0.033 1.54 0.026 2.55 2.4Cobalt 59 0.021 2.11 0.018 1.89 2.7Nickel 60 0.011 1.09 0.023 2.22 0.0Copper 65 0.015 1.50 0.024 2.45 1.9Zinc 67 0.117 7.96 0.115 8.49 8.6Arsenic (As) 75 0.026 2.51 0.018 1.85 5.2Arsenic (AsO) 91 0.050 4.40 0.046 4.34 6.9Cadmium 111 0.019 2.02 0.016 1.63 0.2Tin 118 0.354 7.31 0.171 3.29 6.7Lead 208 0.021 2.11 0.020 2.02 0.4
Solution A (PG:GLY 1:1)6 Replicates
21
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Primary ConfirmationMetal Mass Rec. (%) Mass Rec. (%) RPD (%)
Chromium 53 98.9 52 103.9 11.9Cobalt 59 97.9 - - -Nickel 60 95.9 62 96.4 0.5Copper 65 110.1 63 109.6 0.5Zinc 67 96.9 66 97.9 0.9Arsenic (As) 75 94.0
6.9Arsenic (AsO) 91 100.7Cadmium 111 90.6 112 86.4 4.1Tin 118 84.8 117 90.9 2.6Lead 208 110.1 - - -
Solution A (PG:GLY 1:1)Recoveries spiked in triplicate at 1µg/g.
22
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Metal Mass Solution B (PG:GLY 4:1)Rec. (%)
Solution C (PG:GLY 1:4)Rec. (%)
Chromium 53 101.1 99.5Cobalt 59 97.4 91.6Nickel 60 100.8 93.3Copper 65 100.8 88.3Zinc 67 90.0 84.5Arsenic (As) 75 111.1 81.7Arsenic (AsO) 91 112.7 99.0Cadmium 111 99.8 82.3Tin 118 97.7 98.7Lead 208 99.3 104.5
Two e-liquid solutions evaluated.Recoveries spiked in triplicate at 1µg/g.
23
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Metal Mass Level (ng/mL) Average (ng/mL) % Rec LOD
(ng/mL)Chromium 52 0.5 0.416 83.2 0.02Chromium 53 0.5 0.455 91.1 0.04Cobalt 59 0.1 0.102 102.3 0.04Nickel 60 0.2 0.234 117.2 0.04Nickel 62 0.3 0.314 104.5 0.06Copper 63 0.1 0.112 112.4 0.02Copper 65 0.2 0.173 86.6 0.02Zinc 67 1.0 0.116 115.7 0.12Arsenic (As) 75 0.5 0.421 84.3 0.02Arsenic (AsO) 91 0.5 0.583 116.6 0.09Cadmium 111 0.2 0.222 110.8 0.02Cadmium 112 0.5 0.529 105.8 0.02Tin 118 0.5 0.496 99.2 0.1Lead 208 0.1 0.111 110.9 0.110 replicates performed
Metal Mass Level (ng/mL) Average (ng/mL) % Rec LOD
(ng/mL)Chromium 52 0.5 0.416 83.2 0.02Chromium 53 0.5 0.455 91.1 0.04Cobalt 59 0.1 0.102 102.3 0.04Nickel 60 0.2 0.234 117.2 0.04Nickel 62 0.3 0.314 104.5 0.06Copper 63 0.1 0.112 112.4 0.02Copper 65 0.2 0.173 86.6 0.02Zinc 67 1.0 0.116 115.7 0.12Arsenic (As) 75 0.5 0.421 84.3 0.02Arsenic (AsO) 91 0.5 0.583 116.6 0.09Cadmium 111 0.2 0.222 110.8 0.02Cadmium 112 0.5 0.529 105.8 0.02Tin 118 0.5 0.496 99.2 0.1Lead 208 0.1 0.111 110.9 0.1
Metal Mass Level (ng/mL) Average (ng/mL) % Rec LOD
(ng/mL)Chromium 52 0.5 0.416 83.2 0.02Chromium 53 0.5 0.455 91.1 0.04Cobalt 59 0.1 0.102 102.3 0.04Nickel 60 0.2 0.234 117.2 0.04Nickel 62 0.3 0.314 104.5 0.06Copper 63 0.1 0.112 112.4 0.02Copper 65 0.2 0.173 86.6 0.02Zinc 67 1.0 0.116 115.7 0.12Arsenic (As) 75 0.5 0.421 84.3 0.02Arsenic (AsO) 91 0.5 0.583 116.6 0.09Cadmium 111 0.2 0.222 110.8 0.02Cadmium 112 0.5 0.529 105.8 0.02Tin 118 0.5 0.496 99.2 0.1Lead 208 0.1 0.111 110.9 0.1
24
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
18 Samples Purchased
7 Different Manufacturers
2-3 flavors from each manufacturer
25
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Cr 53 (µg/g)
Co 59 (µg/g)
Ni 60 (µg/g)
As 75 (µg/g)
Cd 111 (µg/g)
Sn 118 (µg/g)
Pb 208 (µg/g)
Cu 65 (µg/g)
Zn 67 (µg/g)
M1F1 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.210M1F2 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.567M1F3 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.487M2F1 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 0.068 2.166M2F2 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.443M2F3 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 2.175M3F1 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.514M3F2 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.911M3F3 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.626M4F1 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.493M4F2 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.412M4F3 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.775M5F1 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.923M5F2 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.158M6F1 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 2.027M6F2 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.183M7F1 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 3.265M7F2 <0.05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 1.962
26
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Expand the method to include additional metals
Investigate e-liquid content in e-cigarettes stored under different conditions
Validate a method for metals in e-cigarette vapor
27
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed
Acknowledgements◦ Katherine Waller◦ Justin Gillikin
For further informationContact Kim Hesse: [email protected]
Global Laboratory Services2107 Black Creek Rd.
Wilson, NC 27893252-234-4950
28
2015
_TS
RC
48_B
row
n.pd
fT
SR
C20
15(6
9) -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed