Meta jc 5.3.2013

29
META JC 5.3.2013

Transcript of Meta jc 5.3.2013

Page 1: Meta jc 5.3.2013

META JC

5.3.2013

Page 2: Meta jc 5.3.2013

First, some definitions

• Coevolution:

– Happens when two species influence each other’s evolution

– Coevolution is a process of reciprocal evolutionary change in interacting species

• An interaction ≠ coevolution

• Coadaption ≠ coevolution

Page 3: Meta jc 5.3.2013

First, some definitions

• Diffuse coevolution – when a species evolves in response to more than 2 species.

Page 4: Meta jc 5.3.2013

Wigglesworthia glossinidia & Tsetse Fly

W. glossinidia Genome~700,000bp

Page 5: Meta jc 5.3.2013

Squid-Vibrio Symbiosis

V. fischeriE. scolopes

Page 6: Meta jc 5.3.2013

Some questions to keep in mind

• How to show coevolution between host and microbial species vs. host and microbiota?

• How does this paper fit into the hologenometheory of evolution?

• How is ‘evolution of the microbiota’ different from species succession/species composition changes?

• How do these results fit in with the hygiene hypothesis?

Page 7: Meta jc 5.3.2013

Gut microbiome and immune system

T-Helper T-regulatory

Protection from pathogens

Recognition ofSelf

T Cells

CD3+CD4+ CD3+CD8+

Page 8: Meta jc 5.3.2013

T-helper Cells

Th

Th1

Th2

Th17

• Increases activation of macrophages (innate immune system)• Protection against intracellular pathogens (virus and intracellular bacteria)

• Increases B cell activation (adaptive immune system) • Immunity against parasites• Implication in allergies

• Protection against extracellular bacteria• Specific to the gut • Intestinal homeostasis

Cytokines –cell signaling molecules

Biomarkers – distinguish T Cell populations

Page 9: Meta jc 5.3.2013

Figure 2. Consequences of immune system imbalances

Immune system homeostasis involves a regulated balance of inflammatory and anti-

inflammatory cells; however, skewed responses putatively through lack of microbial exposure

or outgrowth of pathogenic species may contribute to imbalances associated with the

development of chronic inflammatory disorders.

Fujimura et al. Page 27

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 1.

NIH

-PA

Auth

or M

an

uscrip

tN

IH-P

A A

uth

or M

an

uscrip

tN

IH-P

A A

uth

or M

anu

scrip

t

Th1 – Increases activation of macrophages (innate immune system)Th2 – Increases B cell activation, immunity against parasites, implication in allergiesTh17 – protection against extracellular bacteria, intestinal homeostasis

Fujimura et al., 2010

Page 10: Meta jc 5.3.2013

Intestinal Morphology

Page 11: Meta jc 5.3.2013

Basic Experimental Design

Page 12: Meta jc 5.3.2013

F0F1F2

F0F1F2

N~70

Page 13: Meta jc 5.3.2013
Page 14: Meta jc 5.3.2013

• 30% of OTUs in human inoculum not present in HMb

• 7% of OTUs in mouse inoculum not present in MMb

• “Lost OTUs” were mostly low abundance Firmicutes.

Page 15: Meta jc 5.3.2013
Page 16: Meta jc 5.3.2013

MMb, not HMb mice exhibit expansion of adaptive and innate immune systems

T Helper Cells Regulatory T Cells

Page 17: Meta jc 5.3.2013
Page 18: Meta jc 5.3.2013

A B

Page 19: Meta jc 5.3.2013
Page 20: Meta jc 5.3.2013

DC

nu

mb

er/

(G

F D

C n

um

be

r)LP-DC PP-DC MLN-DC

Page 21: Meta jc 5.3.2013

HMb Mice have Lower Numbers of Memory Cells

N = 7

Page 22: Meta jc 5.3.2013

T Cell Activation

Heat Shock

Th-17

Th-2

Page 23: Meta jc 5.3.2013
Page 24: Meta jc 5.3.2013

Inflammatory Anti-inflammatory

Page 25: Meta jc 5.3.2013
Page 26: Meta jc 5.3.2013

Conclusions

• HMb mice have a reduction in T cell numbersdue to proliferation rate (not cell trafficking)

• HMb mice had more Th2 (implicated in allergies) than Th17 (extracellular pathogen protection)

• Major differences between HMb and MMbwere found in the Firmicutes

• HMb did not do as well when challenged with a pathogen

Page 27: Meta jc 5.3.2013

Some questions to keep in mind

• How to show coevolution between host and microbial species vs. host and microbiota?

• How does this paper fit into the hologenometheory of evolution?

• How is ‘evolution of the microbiota’ different from species succession/species composition changes?

• How do these results fit in with the hygiene hypothesis?

Page 28: Meta jc 5.3.2013
Page 29: Meta jc 5.3.2013