Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt...
![Page 1: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software
By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley
![Page 2: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Robinson-Stavely & Cooper, 1990
Examined the social context effects of computing
Used the simplest meaning of public context, or the mere presence of others
![Page 3: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
(Robinson-Stavely & Cooper, 1990)
Princeton University men and women participated in a study to play with “Zork” , an adventure game. They were instructed to make the most progress that they possibly could in 20 minutesThey worked in a room completely alone or in the presence of another person
Always of the same sex Who was not playing Zork (a “mere presence” condition)
![Page 4: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Features of “Zork”, the adventure game
Male-oriented metaphors, such as -finding treasure - slaying dragons - participants in public condition made
aware that other person was neither competing nor aware of their performance
![Page 5: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Effects of the social context
Results showed that females were just as adept as the males at Zork in the private condition
However, in the public condition the females performed significantly worse and reported more anxiety than the males
It seems that the social context facilitated the gender difference in this study
![Page 6: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Performance scores on Zork
02468
101214161820
Men Women
AloneTogether
![Page 7: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
What about aspects of computing other than computer games?
Computer application classes in high schools often teach software instruction in large, mixed-gender groups.
Students work in open computer labs with many other students working around them
This creates a possible situation for social facilitation to cause gender differences
![Page 8: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
How can we test performance at using office software?
We constructed a task that required participants to put together a simple 6-slide PowerPoint presentation
Participants used data provided by the experiment. No data search or computation was involved, in order to strictly assess performance at the presentation organization task
![Page 9: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Sample Data: Baseball statistics
We used baseball statistics to comprise the sample data that participants would use for the presentation
Assuming that males are more comfortable and accustomed to baseball, this would create a task with male-oriented features, similar to the male oriented “Zork” game (Robinson-Stavely & Cooper, 1990)
In addition, participants completed the experiment in public or private conditions, allowing us to evaluate if the social context would facilitate the gender effects on performance
![Page 10: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Hypothesis
Females completing a male-oriented PowerPoint task would be just as adept at males if they were alone.
However, in the presence of other people, females’ performance would suffer and they would experience more anxiety
![Page 11: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Independent Variables
Half of the participants completed the task in private conditions
Half of the participants completed the task in a mixed-gender group
![Page 12: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Dependent Measures
TimeWe assumed that participants would need more time if
they felt pressured by the social context
Self-reported anxiety, confidence, etc. Pre- and post-test questionnaires evaluated how
anxious, comfortable, confident, and overwhelmed participants felt before and during the task
![Page 13: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Methods
Participants were asked to imagine themselves as a statistician for a sports news companyTheir task would be to organize a PowerPoint presentation involving the home run statistics for 3 players on a major league baseball team over the past 4 years. Stats for 4 teams would be presented, requiring 1 slide per team. In addition, participants would include a title slide and a final slide with a general analysis. Participants knew they were being timed. They were asked to complete the task as quickly as they could, while fulfilling all aspects of the task
![Page 14: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Methods (cont.)
Pre-test questionnaireInstructions- Participants would make 6 slides (Title Slide, 4 Team Slides, Final Slide)Team Slides would include the team name, a bar graph displaying the home run statistics, and text summarizing the general trends of the graphFinal Slide required participants to make some analytical statement or prediction based on the information from the team slidesPost-test questionnaire
![Page 15: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Sample stat chart from instructions
Participants took information from 4 charts such as this and converted it to the bar graph format.
New York Yankees 2000 2001 2002 2003Jason Giambi 43 38 41 41Jorge Posada 28 22 20 30Bernie Williams 30 26 19 15
![Page 16: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Some examples of presentation slides
![Page 17: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Homerun Production, 2000-2004
New York Yankees
Boston Red Sox
Anaheim Angels
St. Louis Cardinals
![Page 18: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
New York Yankees
Jason Giambi has been the Yankees most consistent homerun hitter, averaging just over 40 homers per season.Jorge Posada slumped in 2001 and 2002, while having his best season in 4 years in 2003.Bernie Williams has hit steadily fewer homeruns over the last 4 seasons.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2000 2001 2002 2003
JasonGiambiJorgePosadaBernieWilliams
![Page 19: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
2004 Predictions
Based on the past 4 seasons, the New York Yankees should expect around 75 HRs from their top three hitters.
The Red Sox can expect their three top hitters to produce at least 80 HRs in 2004.
Anaheim’s top hitters will break 70 HRs in 2004.
The Cardinals’ top hitters will surpass 75 HRs in 2004.
![Page 20: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Results: Females in private condition seemed to expect worse performance going in
Pre-Test average scores when subject is alone
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Howcomfortable
How anxious How confident Rate your ability Howoverwhelmed
Using PowerPoint
Rating
MalesFemales
![Page 21: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
This coincides with previous data showing that females tend to be less comfortable and more anxious when using computers.
Females in public condition also expected to perform worse than males
![Page 22: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Results: Time measures revealed that females were just as able as males
Time to complete presentation
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
1
Subjects
Times
Males AloneFemales AloneMales in GroupFemales in Group
![Page 23: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Females did not report more anxiety or less confidence in public condition
Post-Test average scores when subjects were not alone
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
How anxiousHow confidentRate your abilityHow overwhelmed
How tense
How satisfied with importance
How would you like using in future
How confident with slide 6How anxious with slide 6
How aware of other's progress
How did their progress affect yours
How aware were others of your progress
Using PowerPoint
Rating
Males Females
![Page 24: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Against hypothesis
We expected females in the public condition to feel more anxiety, less confidence, less ability, and more tense at the task.
In contrast, data for females and males was similar in this domain.
Any explanation why?
![Page 25: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Females in public condition expected to perform better than those in private
Pre-Test average scores for females
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
How comfortable How anxious How confident Rate your ability How overwhelmed
Using PowerPoint
Rating
Females AloneFemales in Group
![Page 26: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
It is possible that females in the public condition felt more comfortable with the task based on their own ability, rather than the experimental conditions.
Females in the public condition also responded with low ratings of belief that others were aware of their progress,
![Page 27: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Comparison of pre-test and post-test responses in private condition
Comparision of Pre- and Post-Test answers when subjects are alone
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
How anxious How confident Rate your ability How overwhelmed
Using PowerPoint
Rating
Pre-Test MalesPost-Test MalesPre-Test FemalesPost-Test Females
![Page 28: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Comparison of pre-test and post-rest responses in public condition
Comparision of Pre- and Post-Test answers when subjects are in groups
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
How anxious How confident Rate your ability How overwhelmed
Using PowerPoint
Rating
Pre-Test MalesPost-Test MalesPre-Test FemalesPost-Test Females
![Page 29: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Implications from comparisons
In both private and public conditions, females rated themselves as less anxious, more confident, less overwhelmed, and having more ability in the post-test questionnaire.
Likely that females realized that they were as able as males. When thinking about the experiment, they realized that it wasn’t actually all that bad, and felt less anxious.
![Page 30: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Females less confident and more anxious when making analytical prediction
Post-Test average scores when subject is alone
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
How anxious How confidentRate your ability
How overwhelmed
How tense
How satisfied with importanceHow would you like using in future
How confident with slide 6How anxious with slide 6
Using PowerPoing
Rating
MalesFemales
![Page 31: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Why are females significantly worse at this task?
Likely due to male-oriented subject of baseballFemales, having less experience with baseball statistics, felt much less confident when making predictions. Making analytical prediction based much more on experience than the rest of the presentation task.
![Page 32: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Implications and Error Analysis
![Page 33: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Not all hypotheses supported
Results were not significant in the predicted direction for all measures. Evidence showed that females did have more worries about the task before-hand, but any deficits in performance were not correlated with the presence of other people. Females in the public condition actually self-reported as being less anxious than those in private after the experiment. We expected females to need more time in the public condition. They did not.
![Page 34: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Why?
Low number of participantsLeads to high standard deviations, need to run more
experiments
Subject of baseballCould confound the male/female difference in or against
the predicted direction. Also, this makes the results inapplicable to PowerPoint tasks that do not use male-oriented metaphors.
![Page 35: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Other confounds
Typing speed of participant
Computer processing speed
Subjects using a mouse vs a touchpad on a laptop
![Page 36: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Time as a dependent measure
Cognizance of speedSome participants may have forgotten that speed was important.
Participants in the public condition were likely to be aware of others’ progress and subsequently work faster
Interest and CreativityWe assumed that females, less familiar with baseball, would take
longer in public. In contrast, those familiar with baseball (males) could have been more interested in the presentation, gotten more creative, and made a more elaborate presentation, thus taking more time.
![Page 37: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Interest and Creativity
Likely exerted strong effects in subjective part of experiment where participants were required to summarize each graph. Here, there existed great variability in the amount of information that subjects included.
The following 2 slides were from identical parts of the experiment, from 2 different subjects.
![Page 38: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
St. Louis Cardinals
Albert Pujols seems to be the Cardinals’ best bet for the future of their home run hitting.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2000 2002
AlbertPujols
JimEdmondsTinoMartinez
![Page 39: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
St Louis Cardinals
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2000 2001 2002 2003
Albert Pujols*Jim EdmondsTino Martinez
The St. Louis Cardinal hitters fluctuated in their performance. Each player peaked at different years during this four year period (Martinez peaked in 2001, Edmonds in 2000 and Pujols in 2003. Martinez appears to be on a general downward trend after 2001, overall Edmonds has also experienced a dip in performance over the years but he did achieve 39 hits in 2003 which was comparable to 2000, like Edmonds, Pujols appears to be doing significantly better than 2002.*Pujols did not play in 2000
![Page 40: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Future Research
More objective measuresTasks that can be scored on content, rather than being based on
time alone
TimeIf included, there should be less variability in the complexity of
responses. Also, participants should always be aware of need to work fast
Non-biased subject matterTo evaluate if effects are due to content of information, or to actual
software itself
Obviously, more participants
![Page 41: Mere Presence and PowerPoint: Examining Social Facilitation and Software By: Will Osnato and Matt Worley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d5e5503460f94a3e799/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
ConclusionDue to the subjective nature of the experiment, it is difficult to validate our hypothesis. Generally, our experiment supports the idea that females are more anxious going into a PowerPoint task. Such anxiety can be decreased by a task that is completed successfully and relatively quickly. Further research into gender differences and software is warranted, requiring more subjects and more objective methods