MercuryVaccine Cover Up by the US

8/14/2019 MercuryVaccine Cover Up by the US

1/50

GOVERNMENTGOVERNMENT

Mercury-Mercury-Vaccine CoverVaccine CoverUp by the USUp by the US

As investigated by NeurosurgeonAs investigated by NeurosurgeonDr. Russell Blaylock Dr. Russell Blaylock


2/50

When children are given a prescriptionWhen children are given a prescriptiondue to infections, their weight is a keydue to infections, their weight is a key

factorfactor

NOT in the case of NOT in the case of


3/50

WHAT THEYWHAT THEYDONT WANTDONT WANT

YOU TOYOU TOKNOWKNOW


4/50

From the

June 7-8 2000


5/50

Who Was ThereWho Was ThereFifty-one scientists and physicians five of whom represented vaccine

manufacturing pharmaceutical companies:

Smith Kline Beecham(GlaxoSmithKline)Merck Wyeth North American Vaccine

Aventis Pasteur


6/50

The Focus of The MeetingThe Focus of The Meeting

Study of datalink materialStudy of datalink materialauthored byauthored by Dr. ThomasDr. Thomas

VerstraestenVerstraesten who was working forwho was working forthethe National ImmunizationNational Immunization

Program of the CDCProgram of the CDC at the timeat the timelater becoming an employee of later becoming an employee of

GlaxoSmithKline pharmaceuticalsGlaxoSmithKline pharmaceuticals


7/50


8/50

Dr. Roger Bernier Associate Directory for Science in the National Immunization Program

of CDC

the negative findings need to bethe negative findings need to bepinned down and publishedpinned down and published

other less responsible parties willtreat this as a signal

By that he means, a signal of a problem with thimerosal-containing

vaccines. Its safe to assume he wants a paper that only says there wasnothing found by the study


9/50


of CDC

Notes that the ACIP concluded in the 1999 meetingthat the thimerosal-containing vaccines could be used

but the long-term goal is to try to removethimerosal as soon as possible

WHY?WHY?Such a goal would not be verbalized if a potential problem with

thimerosal containing vaccines was not foreseen


10/50

Dr. Weil

the number of dose related relationships are linear and statistically

significant. You can play with this all you want. They are linear.

They are statistically significant

I have to say the number of kids getting help in special education is

growing nationally and state by state at a rate not seen before. So

there is some kind of increase. We can argue about what it is due to


11/50

This association leads me to favor arecommendation that infants up to two

years old not be immunized withthimerosal containing vaccines if suitable

alternative preparations are available

Dr. JohnsonImmunologist and pediatrician a the University of Colorado School of

Medicine and the National Jewish Center for Immunology andRespiratory Medicine


12/50

Forgive this personal comment, but I got called out at eight oclock

for an emergency call and my daughter-in-law delivered a son by c-

section. Our first male in the line of the next generation and I do not

want that grandson to get a Thimerosal containing vaccine until we

know better what is going on. It will probably take a long time. In

the meantime, and I know there are probably implications for this

internationally, but in the meanwhile I think I want that grandson to

only be given Thimerosal-free vaccines .

Dr. JohnsonImmunologist and pediatrician a the University of Colorado School of

Medicine and the National Jewish Center for Immunology andRespiratory Medicine


13/50

It is interesting to note that he feels theanswers will be a long time coming, but in

the mean time, his grandson will be protected. The American Academy of

Pediatrics, The American Academy of Family Practice, the AMA, CDC and every

other organization will endorse thesevaccines and proclaim them to be safe as

spring water, but Dr, Johnson and some of

the others will keep their silence.


14/50

During the last day of theDuring the last day of the

conference it is learned thatconference it is learned thatmost of the objectionsmost of the objections

concerning the positiveconcerning the positiverelationship betweenrelationship between

thimerosal-containingthimerosal-containingvaccines and ADD and ADHAvaccines and ADD and ADHA

were boguswere bogus


15/50

Dr. Rapin

Notes that all children in the studyNotes that all children in the study

were below age 6 and that ADD andwere below age 6 and that ADD and

ADHD are very difficult to diagnoseADHD are very difficult to diagnose

in pre-schoolersin pre-schoolersShe also notes that some childrenShe also notes that some children

were followed for only a short periodwere followed for only a short period


16/50

Dr. Stein

Adds that the average age forAdds that the average age fordiagnosis of ADHD was 4 years and 1diagnosis of ADHD was 4 years and 1

month, a very difficult diagnosis tomonth, a very difficult diagnosis tomake with the guidelines, asmake with the guidelines, as

published by the American Academypublished by the American Academyof Pediatrics, limiting diagnosis to 6of Pediatrics, limiting diagnosis to 6to 12 year oldsto 12 year olds


17/50

Denmark study that led to theDenmark study that led to theannouncement by the Institute of announcement by the Institute of

Medicine that there was noMedicine that there was norelationship between autism and therelationship between autism and the

MMR vaccine, used the sameMMR vaccine, used the sametacticthey cut off the age of follow-tacticthey cut off the age of follow-

up at age sixup at age six

he was implying that too many were diagnosed as ADHD


18/50

It is known that many cases appearafter this age group, especially with ADDand ADHDIn fact, most learning problems appearas the child is called on to handle more

involved intellectual materialTherefore, the chances are that theyfailed to diagnose a number of cases bystopping the study too early

Whats Wrong With This Picture?Whats Wrong With This Picture?


19/50

Several of the participants tried to imply that autism was a geneticdisorder and therefore could have nothing to do with vaccines

Dr. Weil:We dont see that kind of genetic change in 30 years.

How can we suddenly see a 300% increase in a genetically relateddisorder over such a short period?


20/50

It is known that there are two formsIt is known that there are two forms

of autism:of autism:1.1. one that is apparent at birthone that is apparent at birth

2.2. one that develops later in childhoodone that develops later in childhood

The former has not changed inThe former has not changed in

incidence since statistics have beenincidence since statistics have been

kept; the other is epidemickept; the other is epidemic


21/50

One study reported in the journalNeurotoxicology, examined children living in the

Republic of Seychelles. In this study, theyexamined the effect of prenatal exposure to

mercury through the mothers consumption of fishhigh in methylmercury,

A battery of developmental milestone tests weredone and no adverse effects were reported in thestudy reported by Dr. Clarkson and co-workers,

the very same person in this conference. He nevermentions that a follow-up study of these same

children did find a positive correlation betweenmethylmercury exposure and poor performance on

a memory test


22/50

In a subsequent study of childrenIn a subsequent study of children

living on the Faroe Islands exposedliving on the Faroe Islands exposed

to methylmercury, researchers didto methylmercury, researchers didfind impairments of find impairments of

neurodevelopment. This experimentneurodevelopment. This experiment

was done by scientists from Japan.was done by scientists from Japan.


23/50

Throughout the remainder of this discussion, Dr.

Clarkson and others refer to these two studies.

When they are reminded that the Faroe study did findneurological injury to the children, they counter by saying

that this was prenatal exposure to mercury and not after

birth as would be seen with vaccination.The idea being that prenatally the brain is undergoing

neural formation and development making it more

vulnerable.(This rapid brain growth and development continues for

two years after birth and even at age 6 years the brain is

only 80% formed)


24/50

Dr. Clarksonkeeps referring to the Seychelles study, which demonstrated that the

children reached normal neurodevelopmental milestones as shown by anumber of tests

Dr. Weil points out that this tells us little about these childrens future brain

function:

I have taken a lot of histories of kids who are in trouble in school.

The history is that developmental milestones were normal oradvanced and they cant read at second grade, they cant write atthird grade, they cant do math in the fourth grade and it has no

relationship as far as I can tell to the history we get of thedevelopmental milestones. So I think this is a very crude measure of

neurodevelopment.


25/50

In other words, both of these studies tell usnothing about the actual development of

these childrens brain function except thatthey reached the most basic of milestones.To put this another way, your child may beable to stack blocks, recognize shapes andhave basic language skills but later in life

he/she could be significantly impairedwhen it came to higher math, more

advanced language skills (comprehension)and ability to compete in a very

competitive intellectual environment, like

college or advanced schooling.


26/50

Post-natal brain development, that is from birth to age six or seven, involves the fine

tuning of synaptic connections, dendriticdevelopment and pathway refinement, all

of which prepare the brain for morecomplex thinking. These brain elements

are very sensitive to toxins and excessive

immune stimulation during this period.This is never mentioned inThis is never mentioned in

this conferencethis conference


27/50

Remember that the children in these two studies wereexposed only to methylmercury and not the combinedneurotoxic effect of mercury, aluminum and excessiveand chronic activation of the brains immune system(microgia)This is what makes it so incredible, that several of

these vaccinologists and so-called experts wouldexpress doubt about the biological plausibility of thimerosal or any vaccine component causing

neurodevelopmental problemsThe medical literature is exploding with such studies

The biological plausibility isThe biological plausibility is

very powerfulvery powerful


28/50

Mercury, even in low concentrations, is known to impair energy production by

mitochondrial enzymes

The brain has one of the highest metabolic rates of any organ and impairment of

its energy supply, especially during development, can have devastating

consequences.

Mercury, even in lower concentrations, is known to damage DNA and impair

DNA repair enzymes, which again, plays a vital role in brain development

Mercury is known to impair neurotubule stability, even in very low

concentrations.

Neurotubules are absolutely essential to normal brain cell function

Mercury activates microglial cells, which increases excitotoxicity and brain free

radical production as well as lipid peroxidation, central mechanisms in brain

injury

Even in doses below that which can cause obvious cell injury, mercury impairs

the glutamate transport system, which in turn triggers excitotoxicity, a central

mechanism in autism and other neurological disorders

Ironically, aluminum also paralyzes this system


29/50

Another admission that the government has had no interest indemonstrating the safety of thimerosal-containing vaccines despite over

2000 articles showing harmful effects of mercury:

Reference are made to the fact that theFDA has a wonderful facility in

Arkansas with hundreds of

thousands of animals available for any study needed to supply these

answers on safety


30/50

So, why has theSo, why has thegovernment ignored thegovernment ignored the

need for research toneed for research toanswer these questionsanswer these questionsconcerning thimerosalconcerning thimerosal

safety?safety?


31/50

Dr. Brent

The medical/legal findings in this study , causal ornot, are horrendous. If an allegation was made

that a childs neurobehavioral findings werecaused by thimerosal-containing vaccines, you

could readily find a junk scientist who will supportthe claim with a reasonable degree of certainty

He then admits that they are in a bad position because they have no data

for their defense. Now, who are the junk scientists?


32/50

Dr. Myers

My own concern, and a couple of you said it,there is an association between vaccines and

outcomes that worries both parents and

pediatricians . He sites other possible connections to vaccine-related neurobehavioral

and neurodevelopmental problems including:

the number of vaccines being giventhe number of vaccines being giventhe types of antigens being used the types of antigens being used

other vaccine additivesother vaccine additives


33/50

Dr. Caserta

Tells the group that he attended theTells the group that he attended thealuminum conference the previousaluminum conference the previousyear and learned that metals couldyear and learned that metals could

often act differently in biologicaloften act differently in biological

systemssystems (such as the human body)(such as the human body) than as an ionthan as an ion

Fl id h bi d l i


34/50

Fluoride when combined to aluminumforms a compound that can destroy

numerous hippocampal neurons at aconcentration of 0.5 ppm in drinkingwater It seems that aluminum readilycombines with fluoride to form thistoxic compoundWith over 60% of communities havingfluoridated drinking water this becomes

a major concern I h l b l d h fl l i d


35/50

It has also been learned that fluoroaluminum compoundsmimic the phosphate and can activate G-proteinsG-proteins play a major role in numerous biological systems,

including endocrine, neurotransmitters, and as cellular secondmessengersSome of the glutamate receptors are operated by a G-protein

mechanism

They discuss how to controlThey discuss how to control

this information so that itthis information so that itwill not get out and if it doeswill not get out and if it does

how to control the damagehow to control the damage


36/50

Dr. ClementsBut there is now the point at which the

research results have to be handled, andeven if this committee decides that thereis no association and that informationgets out, the work has been done and

through the freedom of information thatwill be taken by others and will be usedin other ways beyond the control of thisgroup. And I am very concerned about

that as I suspect that it is already too lateto do anything regardless of any

professional body and what they say.


37/50

In other words, he wants this information kept not only from the public

but also from other scientists and pediatricians until they can be properly

counseled.Then he spills the beans as to why he is determined that no outsider get

hold of this damaging information

My mandate as I sit here in this group is to makesure at the end of the day that 100,000,000 are

immunized with DTP, Hepatitis B and if possibleHib, this year, next year and for many years tocome, and that will have to be with thimerosal

containing vaccines unless a miracle occurs and analternative is found quickly and is tried and found

to be safe.

I h i i


38/50

In essence he is saying:

I dont care if the vaccines are found to be harmful and destroying the

development of childrens brains, thesevaccines will be given now and forever.His only concern by his own admissionis to protect the vaccine program even

if it is not safe

D R i


39/50

Dr. RapinRaises the point about a loss of an IQ point caused by thimerosal

exposure:

Can we measure the IQ thataccurately, that this one little point isrelevant? Then she answers her own

question by saying, Even in myEven in mygrandchildren, one IQ point Igrandchildren, one IQ point I

am going to fight about am going to fight about D Ch


40/50

Dr. Chen

We have been privileged so far thatWe have been privileged so far that

given the sensitivity of information,given the sensitivity of information,we have been able to manage to keepwe have been able to manage to keep

it out of, lets say, less responsibleit out of, lets say, less responsible

handshands


41/50

This information has been held

fairly tightly. Later he calls it

embargoed information and veryhighly protected information


of CDC

D O i


42/50

Dr. Orenstein

In a sense this meeting addressesIn a sense this meeting addressessome of the concerns we had lastsome of the concerns we had last

summer when we weresummer when we were trying totrying tomake policy in the absence of amake policy in the absence of a

careful scientific reviewcareful scientific review . I think this. I think this

time we have gotten it straight.time we have gotten it straight.


43/50

ThereThere was little or no sciencewas little or no science

in this meeting; rather it wasin this meeting; rather it wascomposed of a lot of hagglingcomposed of a lot of haggling

and nit picking overand nit picking overepidemiological methodologyepidemiological methodology

and statistical minutia in anand statistical minutia in aneffort to discredit the dataeffort to discredit the data

without successwithout success The study done by Dr. Thomas Verstraeten examined the records of


44/50

The study done by Dr. Thomas Verstraeten examined the records of 110,000 children. Within the limits of the data, they did a very thorough

study and found the following:

-Exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines at one month wasassociated significantly with the misery and unhappiness disorder that was dose related. That is, the higher the childs exposure tothimerosal the higher the incidence of the disorder. This disorder is

characterized by a baby that cries uncontrollably and is fretful more sothan that see in normal babies.

-A nearly significant increased risk of ADD with 12.5ug exposure atone month.

-With exposure at 3 months, they found an increasing risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, including speech disorders, withincreasing exposure to thimerosal

This was statistically significantThis was statistically significant It is important to remember that the


45/50

It is important to remember that thecontrol group was not children without

thimerosal exposure but, rather, thoseat 12.5ug exposureThis means that there is a significantlikelihood that even moreneurodevelopmental problems would

have been seen had they used a realcontrol population No one disagreed that these findingswere significant and troubling When the final st d as p blished in the


46/50

When the final study was published in thejournal Pediatrics, Dr. Verstraeten and co-

workers reported that no consistentassociations were found betweenthimerosal-containing vaccine exposureand neurodevelopmental problemsIn addition, he list himself as an employee

of the CDC, not disclosing the fact that atthe time the article was accepted, heworked for GlaxoSmithKline, a vaccine

manufacturing company They simply added another HMO to the data: the


47/50

They simply added another HMO to the data: theHarvard Pilgrimage. Congressman Dave Weldonnoted in his letter to the CDC Director that thisHMO had been in receivership by the state of Massachusetts because its records were inshambles.Yet, this study was able to make the embarrassingdata from Dr. Verstraetens previous studydisappearAttempts by Congressman Weldon to force the

CDC to release the data to an independentresearcher, Dr. Mark Geier, a researcher withimpeccable credentials and widely published inpeer-reviewed journals, have failed repeatedly.


48/50

It isIt is obviousobvious that athat a

massivemassivecover-upcover-up is inis in

What These Scientists And Pediatricians Are Actually Saying Is:


49/50

y y g

I intend to make sure that nobodyin my family is put at risk withmercury-containing vaccines.

TO HELL WITH THE RESTTO HELL WITH THE REST

OF THE CHILDREN INOF THE CHILDREN IN

AMERICA AND ABROADAMERICA AND ABROAD


50/50

Back to Presentation Index
http://poisonevercure.150m.com/Presentations/presentation.htmhttp://poisonevercure.150m.com/Presentations/presentation.htmhttp://poisonevercure.150m.com/Presentations/presentation.htm

MercuryVaccine Cover Up by the US

Documents

Transcript of MercuryVaccine Cover Up by the US