Mentoring for the Demographically Mismatched Giddings Award Symposium In Honor of Alanah Fitch ACS...
-
Upload
pierce-barber -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Mentoring for the Demographically Mismatched Giddings Award Symposium In Honor of Alanah Fitch ACS...
Mentoring for the Demographically Mismatched
Giddings Award Symposium
In Honor of
Alanah FitchACS 12 September 2006
When I first met AF….
• Clay films on electrodes
• Length scales• “this will never
work….
Krzysik, R. J., Alanah Fitch. Multisweep cyclic voltammetric studies on the effect of charge on diffusion and sorption processes of ML3
n+ chelates at clay-modified electrodes +, J.
Electroanalytical Chemistry, 1994, 379, 129-134.
Alanah Fitch
• BA Anthropology• MS Soil Fertility• PhD Agronomy• Postdocs: Soil
chemistry; electrochemistry
• Professor Chemistry Loyola - Chicago
• Spanish• Reading & typing• Books: Pb• Smart• Musicals & instruments• Grows garden• Army of pets• Erika, Adam, and Al• Determined to save world
The Lead Project
• Scientifically relevant
• Integrated across length scales
• Changes the world
• All things Alanah:
Complex, complete, competent
Congratulations
“Talk about Larry R. Faulkner’s Mentoring Style….”
Maybe in the context of our joint experiences upon joining the Revolution, unwittingly, in 1985…
Come the Revolution….
In the mid-1980s, the community considering:
• Increase number of women in science?– How?– How to Mentor
1964 Gordon Conference on Electrochemistry (the first)
http:/ /www.vanysek.com/electrochem/RAO%20GRC2.doc Thanks to Petr Vanysek, Steve Feldberg, Fred Anson
1974 Gordon Conference
1984 Gordon Conference
1985 Gordon Conference
First Meetings
• Alanah GRC 1984/1985
• LRF UT ~1982
• Talk of science
1984 GRC – One of the early effective mentoring events
• LRF Chair
• JL’s first major meeting and most important
• Changed everything– Exciting science – Contacts– How science is done
~1985: The Revolution is Here…
• AF and I recruited unknowingly into Revolution
• Naïve recruits – about how science works; not the science
• Mentors stepped forward – naive too
• Everyone naïve about the magnitude of the “Project”
Early Interactions of Mentees &Mentors • At meetings, stochastic interaction between
distribution of mentees and mentors– Mentee : Mentee– Mentor : Mentee– Mentor : Mentor?
• Distribution of skill sets
• Clear demographic
differences between
mentors and menteesMentor Mentee
Batch Mentoring
• About 10 women, mostly young
• “Senior Women”
Janet Osteryoung
Therese Cotton
Over time, effective mentoring combinations developed
• Never formally arranged
• Matched interests
• Based on trust
• Both choose
• Choose carefully – long process
?
Successful Mentors Early Realize
• Exist competence, but not in the box
• If push into box, will kill it
Standard Box
?
Successful Mentors Eventually Realize
It is impossible to underestimate how naïve the demographically remote can be.
They are not of the system.
Successful Mentors Can See Things from the Mentee’s Perspective
Successful Mentors Offer• Listening• Sound, thoughtful
advice that relies on mentee’s intelligence – “Concise and
Compelling”
• A place to ask dumb questions
• No blanket directives• Patience
• Constant and available– There
• Reinforces strengths– LRF’s confidence
• Reliable follow through
• Creative problem solving
• Scientific competence
1994 Gordon Conference
The Early Revolution
• Through 1990, women and men not different– No Pink: didn’t wear it; didn’t say it
– Not even pink money
• ~1994, “We are not men.”
The Survivors – An Unlikely Band of Revolutionaries
• High losses from the Batch
• The survivors:– Short– Predictable response – even under stress– “Ladylike”
• Alanah and Johna; Fristch and Fitch…
Other Mentors
• The Good Guys– Bob Osteryoung, “Not like other people…”– Steve Feldberg, “Sounds good,…”– Henry Blount, recognized the challenges early– Joe Maloy, “Oy.”– Peter Fedkiw, “That’s intriguing.”
• The Stealth Mentors– Reviewers who take the time
Is the Revolution Over Yet? No.
Apparently, the Revolution takes a long time.
Revolution ~ O (1 academic lifetime)
Then, what is the Report from the Front?
A Plot for Alanah
• Informal survey of GRC photos• The mechanism?• How many go into academics?• How many female-mentored females go into academics?• A separate but equal female science?• Why is my group all male? The next revolution?
Approx. Number of Females at GRC by Year
y = 0.0094x2 - 36.689x + 35769
R2 = 0.8692
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year
# F
em
ale
s
A Plot for Alanah
Approx. Number of Females at GRC by Year
y = 0.0094x2 - 36.689x + 35769
R2 = 0.8692
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year
# F
em
ale
s
2003 Gordon Conference
Acknowledgments
• Congratulations to Alanah
• Thanks to Alanah
• Grateful acknowledgments to all those who have tried to help.
• Most grateful acknowledgment and appreciation to Larry Faulkner, who figured out how to mentor the demographically mismatched.