Membership and member's rights

download Membership and member's rights

of 6

description

Section 181 of companies act 1965

Transcript of Membership and member's rights

  • 5/20/2018 Membership and member's rights

    1/6

    Membership and Members Rights

    STATUTORY REMEDIES

    1. Members statutory remedies: (a) oppression remedy, (b) court ordered winding up,

    (c)statutory injunction, (d) statutory rights to inspect company books

    2.

    Members personal action

    3.

    Members derivative action

    1.

    (a) OPPRESSION REMEDY

    - S.181 had 2 limbs. It gives the court to power remedy conduct where it is of the opinion

    that:

    Conduct of the companys affairs or directors powers are being exercised in an

    oppressive manneror in disregard of members interestincluding himself

    An actual or proposed act or omission by or on behalf of the company or a

    resolution, or a proposed resolution of members or a class of members is either

    unfairly prejudicial to or unfairly discriminatory against members.

    - It would appear to cover cases of fraud on minority and aspects of just and equitable

    ground for winding upS.218(1)(i). Refer to S.218(1)(f). S.181 is use to force controllers

    of the companies to consider the interest of the minority shareholders.

    - The remedy can apply to any type of company but in practice, oppression actions must

    brought by members of private companies, that have only few participants and which

    the members involved in management.

    -

    S.181(1)- a members or debenture-holders of a company or the Minister may apply for

    remedy.

    Niord Pty Ltd v Adelaide Petroleum NL

    An equitable interest as an unregistered transferee is insufficient and does not

    confer the necessary standing upon the applicant to make an application under

    S.181.

    Re A Company: Right to apply for remedy extends to a legal personal representative of

    a member and to a person to whom a share in the company has been transmitted by

    will or operation of law.

    Owen Sim Liang Khui v Piasau Jaya Sdn Bhd:A petitioner must be able to demonstrate

    that his/her name appears on a companys register of members at date of presentation

    of petition. However, a R who is guilty of unconscionable or inequitable conduct is not

    permitted to rely upon the general requirement of membership in order to defeat a

    petitioner standing.

  • 5/20/2018 Membership and member's rights

    2/6

    Membership and Members Rights

    Kumagai Gumi Co Ltd v Zenecon-Kumagai Sdn Bhd: Minority shareholders may seek

    relief and majority shareholders in circumstances where they are unable for any reason

    to exert their will at general meeting of their company.

    -

    Objective standard test is required. Unfairness determined objectively. It means theconduct may be considered oppressive or unfair even it is established that the person

    alleged to have been acting oppressively or unfairly did not intend to harm the

    complaining shareholder.

    Oppressive/unfair if no reasonable director would have acted in that way.

    Not necessary for directors/majority shareholders acted dishonestly.

    - Disregard of interests of the members of debenture-holders: Re Kong Thai Sawmill

    (Miri) Sdn. Bhd- something more than a failure to take account of minority interest.

    There must be awareness of that interest and an evident decision to override it/brushit aside/ to set at naught the proper company procedure.

    Unfairly prejudicial/ unfairly discriminatory: Morgan v 45 Flers Avenue Pty Ltd-regard

    as a composite whole and the individual elements should be considered merely as

    different aspects of the essential criterion, that is commercial unfairness.

    - Examples of oppressive, disregard of members interests and unfairly prejudicial or

    unfairly discriminatory conduct:

    Diversion of corporate assets or opportunityScottish Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer,

    -

    co-operative society diverted the profits of the company to a new

    department of theirs, after failing to purchase the shares of the petitioners

    in the company.

    - It was held that the conduct of majority constituted oppression under

    English equivalent of S.181 and ordered majority to buy the shares of the

    minority.

    Kumagai Gumi Co Ltd: Diverting the companys business opportunities to

    related companies amounted to oppression.

    Diversion of profits

    Re Gee Hoe Chan Trading Co Pte Ltd: Directors by paying themselves directors

    fees and salaries but not declaring dividends had acted inequitable and was

    held to constitute a basis for an allegation of unfair prejudice.

    o A majority may act oppressively/unfairly where the minority shareholders are

    excluded from being directors and a significant proportion of profits paid in

    form of high directors fees and low dividends to shareholders.

  • 5/20/2018 Membership and member's rights

    3/6

    Membership and Members Rights

    Directors failure to act in the interest of the company -minority may apply this

    Re Spargos Mining NL

    - Court found that the affairs of the company were conducted in a manner

    that was oppressive and unfair. The directors exhibited an endemicincapacity to deal with the companys affairs bygiving sloe attention to its

    interests. There were conflict of interests that were detrimental to the

    company, its shareholders and the minority SH not interested in other

    companies for whose benefit the transactions were undertaken.

    Transactions were almost entirely devoid of any commercial benefit to the

    company.

    Shares issued for improper purposes

    If Ds who breached their duty which also a majority SH, they will actoppressively/unfairly if (as shareholders) they vote to ratify their improper

    purpose.

    Hannes v MJH Pty Ltd: A majority shareholder could not ratify his own breaches

    as it would be oppressive/unfair. The disinterested shareholders could only

    ratify the particular decisions made by the directors.

    No dividend/inadequate dividend given

    Art 98-it gives the directors actual power to declare a dividend and to

    determine maximum amount.

    Low Peng Boon v Low Janie : the non-payment of dividend coupled with the

    misappropriation of company funds could amount to oppression.

    Eric Lau Man Hing v Eramara Jaya Sdn. Bhd. & Ors :Non-payments of dividends

    together with a failure to keep proper records amounted to oppressive conduct

    in disregard of the interests of the minority shareholders by the majority.

    Re Gee Hoe Chan Trading Co Pte Ltd: a minimum amount of dividend couples

    with a generous remuneration for the directors may be considered as a conduct

    that is oppressive/unfair.

    Dominant members run the company as if it were their own, disregarding the

    rights and interests of the other company

    Re HR Harmer Ltd

    - H R Harmer founded a stamp business. In 1947, HRH formed a company to buy the

    business; at this time, HRH was 77. The initial directors of the company were HRH and

    his sons Cyril H and Bernard H. The shareholders were HRH, CH, BH and HRHswife.

    Together HRH and his wife had over 75% of the votes, and his wife always voted with

  • 5/20/2018 Membership and member's rights

    4/6

    Membership and Members Rights

    HRH. HRH ran the business in an autocratic way: hiring and firing yesmen,ignoring

    views of the other directors, opening a branch in Australia which folded and sold a

    successful branch in the US. The sons sued for unfair prejudicial conduct.

    -The court ordered that HRH was to be employed as a seniorstamp consultantwith a

    salary of 2500 per annum; HRH was not to interfere in any way with the running of

    the company; HRH was appointed as presidentfor lifebut with no powers; and the

    company was forced to buy his shares from HRH.

    Re Coliseum Car Stand Service Ltd: Although there is no obligation on the Ds of

    the company to recommend declaration of dividends, if the company has been

    making profit for several years or in situations where the directors have

    obtained excessive compensation or benefit, the members can apply for the

    oppression remedy.

    - Orders that the court can make: S.181[2]

    Winding up

    Regulating the companys affairs

    Purchase or oppressed members shares

    Appointment of receiver

    Restraining someone from doing something, or requiring someone to do something.

    1.

    (b) COURT-ORDERED WINDING UP

    -

    A member of a company (creditor in some case) can apply to court to have the

    company wound up where:

    It is just and equitable to do so. S.218(1)(i), or

    Directors acting in their own interest. S.218(1)(f), or

    Oppresive, unfairly prejudicial; or unfairly discriminatory conduct. S.181(1)

    -

    Company, creditor, contributory and liquidator of company who apply for winding up

    cannot apply under S.218(1)(f) and (i) as they could pursue another remedy.

    - Just and equitable ground: situations-s.218(1)(i)

    i)

    Breakdown of mutual trust and confidence.

    -in case of small companies that evolved partnerships or that operate in a

    similar manner to partnerships, it was held just and equitable to wind up the

    company when the relationship between partners breaks down.

    Lawrence v Lawrick: Mutual trust and confidence between directors broke

    down when one D committed adultery with the wife of the other. Court

    ordered to wound up the comp.

    -if there is convincing evidence on breakdown of mutual confidence and good

    faith, it would justify the winding up on just and equitable ground.

  • 5/20/2018 Membership and member's rights

    5/6

    Membership and Members Rights

    ii) Deadlock

    -where shareholders in a company are deadlocked to the extent that the

    company is unable to function properly. There must be evidence of deadlock

    that clear and fully presented otherwise application will be dismissed.

    iii) Fraud, misconduct or oppression-this ground has been largely incorporated into S.181 that allows a wide range

    of remedies.

    iv) Failure of substratum

    -means ceases to carry on the business for which it was formed.

    Re Eastern Telegraph Co Ltd: A shareholder who invested money in his shares

    for what the company is going to carry out particular object, he cannot be

    forced against his will to continue pay his money for different project or

    speculation.

    1.

    (C) STATUTORY INJUNCTION

    -Court order to stop someone from breaching CA

    -Provisions: S.132C, S.132E, S.28

    -Any member can apply

    1. (D) INSPECT COMPANY BOOKS

    -S.157-member can apply to court for authorization to inspect company books

    -court can authorize either the member /representative

    -member must act in good faith

    2. MEMBERS PERSONAL ACTION

    -Personal action-legal action to enforce a personal right.

    -members have personal right from :

    * statutory contract(express)-

    * S.33- AA/MM - between members and members vs company

    *Companies Act- eg: right of a member holding at least 10% of the paid up capital

    to call a general meeting- S.145

    3. MEMBERS DERIVATIVE ACTION

    -Derivative- an action to enforce a right of the company . Eg, to enforce a breach of

    directors duties.

    -even though a member brings a derivative action, the action is not for the benefit

    of the member but for the companys benefit.

    -Any remedies goes to the company

    -wrongdoers cited as defendants, company joins as nominal defendant.

    -statutory derivative action(SDA):S.181A-181E

  • 5/20/2018 Membership and member's rights

    6/6

    Membership and Members Rights

    Mohd Shuaib Ishak v Celcom (Malaysia) Bhd.

    -improve position of minority SH

    Ng Hoy Keong v Chua Choon Yang

    -5 issues relevant to application for SDA:

    Leave-S.181B

    Good faith- S.181B

    Reasonable notice-S.181A

    Costs-indemnity order-S.181E

    Interests of company-S.181B