Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM
Transcript of Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM
![Page 1: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Active Galactic Nucleian Historical Review
Meg UrryYale University
![Page 2: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
•• Black hole Black hole •• Accretion disk Accretion disk •• Hot corona Hot corona •• BroadBroad--line region line region •• NarrowNarrow--line region line region •• Obscuring gas/dust Obscuring gas/dust •• (Relativistic jets)(Relativistic jets)
AGN ElementsAGN Elements
![Page 4: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
M
M•
EnvironmentInteractions Star-formation Stripping Obscuration
θ
z
Relativistic beamingradio, optical, X-ray, γ-ray
Obscuration
Evolution
B
![Page 5: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
(Partial) Review of AGN
• Relativistic beaming and jets
• AGN demographics at “quasar epoch” (z ∼ 2)
• Feedback and co-evolution of BH & galaxies
>
![Page 6: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Relativistic Beaming
• Rapid variability• Superluminal motion• X-ray jets• Population demographics
![Page 7: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Rapid Variability (gamma rays)
5 days
x10
Mattox et al.
![Page 8: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
NGC 6251 radio structure
![Page 9: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Superluminal Motion
50 light years
3C279 Wehrle et al. 2001
![Page 10: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Uchiyama et al. 2006, Jester et al. 2006
3C 273 Jet
1″
![Page 11: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Population statistics confirm relativistic beaming
• Radio galaxies are parent population of blazars Schwartz, Orr & Browne
• Luminosity functions match (R,X,O) Urry, Padovani
• Radio counts match Wall & Jackson
• Possible evolutionary sequences OVV→BL Lac, FR2 →FR1 Cavaliere, Maraschi
• Blazar “family” in accretion/jet power Fossati, Ghisellini
![Page 12: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Remaining Questions • Extraction of energy from BH
– Jet power kinetic luminosity function
– Magnetic field configuration– Role of disk
• Physics of jets– Matter content (Protons?)– Power– Particle acceleration
• Radio-loud v. radio-quiet – Nature or nurture?
![Page 13: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Obscuration
• Hard X-ray background
• Spectropolarimetry (local AGN)
• Demographics in deep multiwavelength surveys
![Page 14: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
X-ray “Background” Spectrum
Courtesy Brusa, Comastri, Gilli, Hasinger
![Page 15: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
unabsorbed AGN spectrum
Increasing NH
![Page 16: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Extended Chandra Deep Field-South
MUSYC, GOODS surveys:UBVRIz JHK, NB & MB imagingHST, Spitzer, Chandra, VLT, Gemini, Subaru,
Magellan, KPNO, CTIO, VLA, AT, …
Brandt et al. 2006, Virani et al. 2006Dickinson, Giavalisco, Koekemoer, Rix & GEMS team,
Gawiser, van Dokkum, Kriek, Taylor, CMU, …
![Page 17: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
HST ACS color image (0.3% of GOODS)
![Page 18: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
HST+Spitzer color image (0.3% of GOODS)
![Page 19: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
AGN in Deep Surveys• Obscured AGN dominate population Treister et al. 2004, 2005,
2006a,b,c– optical counts, N(z) well fit by 3:1 ratio, 50% AGN not in
CDFs– fits X-ray background– fits IR counts; LAGN,IR ∼10x LGal,IR; low AGN % of IR
extragalactic light– Integral & BAT surveys constrain Compton-thick AGN, BH
accretion history– Obscured/unobscured ratio decreases with luminosity Barger et
al. 2005, Hasinger et al. 2005– meta-analysis shows obs/unobs ratio increases with z
• Hard X-ray background dominated by obscured AGN Giacconi et al. 1979, Setti & Woltjer 1989, Madau et al. 1994, Comastri et al. 1995, Gilli et al. 2001, Worsley et al. 2005
• FIR Searches find candidates Polletta et al., Alonso-Herrero et al.
![Page 20: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
CreateCreate ensemble of AGNAGN, with continuous range of obscuration,
correct SEDs for Unification (type i sed + obsc),known luminosity distribution,
known cosmic evolutionGenerate expected survey Generate expected survey
content content at X-ray, Optical, Infrared, or any wavelengths,
as function of Flux and RedshiftCompare to dataCompare to data
GOODS, MUSYC,GOODS, MUSYC,SEXSI, SWIRE, CLASXS, H2XMM, AMSS, Groth,
COSMOS, Lockman, CHAMP, …
![Page 21: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Treister et al. 2004
![Page 22: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Treister et al. 2004
![Page 23: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
redshifts of Chandra deep X-ray sources
GOODS-N
Barger et al. 2002,3, Hasinger et al. 2002, Szokoly et al. 2004
![Page 24: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
redshifts of Chandra deep X-ray sources
GOODS-N
Barger et al. 2002,3, Hasinger et al. 2002, Szokoly et al. 2004
![Page 25: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Treister et al. 2005, Gilli et al. 2006
X-ray background synthesis
![Page 26: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
X-ray background synthesis
Treister et al. 2005, Gilli et al. 2006
![Page 27: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
X-ray background synthesis
Treister et al. 2005, Gilli et al. 2006
![Page 28: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
AGN in Deep Surveys• Obscured AGN dominate population Treister et al. 2004, 2005,
2006a,b,c– optical counts, N(z) well fit by 3:1 ratio, 50% AGN not in
CDFs– fits X-ray background– fits IR counts; LAGN,IR ∼10x LGal,IR; low AGN % of IR
extragalactic light– Integral & BAT surveys constrain Compton-thick AGN, BH
accretion history– Obscured/unobscured ratio decreases with luminosity Barger et
al. 2005, Hasinger et al. 2005–– metameta--analysis shows analysis shows obs/unobsobs/unobs ratio increases with zratio increases with z
• Hard X-ray background dominated by obscured AGN Giacconi et al. 1979, Setti & Woltjer 1989, Madau et al. 1994, Comastri et al. 1995, Gilli et al. 2001, Worsley et al. 2005
• FIR Searches find candidates Polletta et al., Alonso-Herrero et al.
![Page 29: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
7 surveys
2341 AGN
1229 with z
Area as function of X-ray flux & optical mag
Treister & Urry 2006
![Page 30: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Treister & Urry 2006
![Page 31: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Treister & Urry 2006
![Page 32: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
AGN in Deep Surveys• Obscured AGN dominate population Treister et al. 2004, 2005,
2006a,b,c
• Hard X-ray background dominated by moderate-luminosity obscured AGN at 0.5<z<1.5 Giacconi et al. 1979, Setti & Woltjer 1989, Madau et al. 1994, Comastri et al. 1995, Gilli et al. 2001, Worsley et al. 2005
– Only 60% (50%) XRBG resolved at 6-8keV (8 keV)• Consistent with missing population of highly obscured AGN
– Luminosity-dependent density evolution Ueda et al. 2003, Barger et al. 2005
• FIR Searches find candidates Polletta et al., Alonso-Herrero et al.
![Page 33: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Luminosity-dependent density evolution
Hasinger et al. 2005
>1046 ergs/s
1045-6 ergs/s
1044-5 ergs/s1043-4 ergs/s1042-3 ergs/s
![Page 34: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
AGN in Deep Surveys• Obscured AGN dominate population Treister et al. 2004, 2005,
2006a,b,c
• Hard X-ray background dominated by obscured AGN Giacconi et al. 1979, Setti & Woltjer 1989, Madau et al. 1994, Comastri et al. 1995, Gilli et al. 2001, Worsley et al. 2005
• FIR Searches find candidates Polletta et al., Alonso-Herrero et al.
–– Up to x2 missing from XUp to x2 missing from X--ray surveysray surveys–– Works best at bright IR fluxes (>1 Works best at bright IR fluxes (>1 mJymJy))–– IR catalog dominated by star formationIR catalog dominated by star formation–– IR spectral cuts miss some bona fide AGNIR spectral cuts miss some bona fide AGN
![Page 35: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Remaining Questions • Spectrum of AGN above 10 keV
– Hard X-ray large-area survey
• Evolution of AGN– With luminosity
– At different wavelengths
![Page 36: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
•• MMBHBH -- σσ relation relation • All (nearby) galaxies host black holes• Common evolution• AGN host galaxies appear normal
– Fundamental plane, evolution O’Dowd et al. 2005, Woo et al. 2005
• AGN feedback on galaxies– Central cluster galaxies (e.g., Perseus A)– Goldilocks for galaxies ⎯ not too big, not too small?
The formation and evolution of galaxiesis closely tied to
the growth of black holes
![Page 37: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
MBH related to galaxy bulge
in normal and active galaxies
Kormendy & Gebhardt 2001
![Page 38: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
• MBH - σ relation •• All (nearby) galaxies host black holesAll (nearby) galaxies host black holes• Common evolution• AGN host galaxies appear normal
– Fundamental plane, evolution O’Dowd et al. 2005, Woo et al. 2005
• AGN feedback on galaxies– Central cluster galaxies (e.g., Perseus A)– Goldilocks for galaxies ⎯ not too big, not too small?
The formation and evolution of galaxiesis closely tied to
the growth of black holes
![Page 39: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
• MBH - σ relation • All (nearby) galaxies host black holes•• Common evolutionCommon evolution• AGN host galaxies appear normal
– Fundamental plane, evolution O’Dowd et al. 2005, Woo et al. 2005
• AGN feedback on galaxies– Central cluster galaxies (e.g., Perseus A)– Goldilocks for galaxies ⎯ not too big, not too small?
The formation and evolution of galaxiesis closely tied to
the growth of black holes
![Page 40: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Rate of cosmic BH/star formation(measured) BH growth ratestar formation rate (GOODS)
ρ BH
(Mo
yr−1
Mpc
−3)
![Page 41: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
• MBH - σ relation • All (nearby) galaxies host black holes• Common evolution•• AGN host galaxies appear normalAGN host galaxies appear normal
– Fundamental plane, evolution O’Dowd et al. 2005, Woo et al. 2005
• AGN feedback on galaxies– Central cluster galaxies (e.g., Perseus A)– Goldilocks for galaxies ⎯ not too big, not too small?
The formation and evolution of galaxiesis closely tied to
the growth of black holes
![Page 42: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
• MBH - σ relation • All (nearby) galaxies host black holes• Common evolution• AGN host galaxies appear normal
– Fundamental plane, evolution O’Dowd et al. 2005, Woo et al. 2005
•• AGN feedback on galaxiesAGN feedback on galaxies– Central cluster galaxies (e.g., Perseus A)– Goldilocks for galaxies ⎯ not too big, not too small?
The formation and evolution of galaxiesis closely tied to
the growth of black holes
![Page 43: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
X-ray image of Perseus cluster of galaxies
NASA/CXC/IoA/Fabian et al. 2003
![Page 44: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Simmons et al., in prep.
Optical imaging of host galaxies
![Page 45: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
(Lots of) Questions remaining
• Feedback, co-evolution of galaxies and BH– Phasing of BH growth and star formation– Relative time scales– Energy deposition from AGN– Evolution of mass function of black holes
• Galaxy observables– Host galaxy mass– Star formation rates, stellar populations– Environmental effects
What we will learn about AGN in the next 30 years (i)
![Page 46: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
• Processes near BH– Formation, acceleration, collimation of jets– Evolution along jet (B, N, Γ)– Cosmic ray production, particle acceleration
• BH Energetics– Magnetic fields, energization of corona– Matter content of jets – Accretion disk structure and physics
What we will learn about AGN in the next 30 years (ii)
![Page 47: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Deborah Dultzin-Hacyan
has worked on nearly every topic I mentioned (and more besides)!
In the last 30 years,
![Page 48: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Backup Slides
![Page 49: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Radio loud v. Radio quiet
Is radio loudness bimodal?Could relativistic jets form near all black holes?
![Page 50: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Bimodality: PG quasars
R
Quasars
AGNN
umbe
r
Kellerman et al. VLA OBSERVATIONS OF PG QUASARS
![Page 51: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
FIRST quasars
White et al. 2001
![Page 52: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Blazars: the spectral sequence
FSRQ
BL Lacs
Fossati et al. 1998; Donato et al. 2001
RED
BLUE
![Page 53: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Blazars: emission models lman & Rees 1994; Dermer(Maraschi, Ghisellini & Celotti 1992; Sikora, Bege & Schlickeiser 1993 ...)
Resolved X-ray jet
Blazar emission region
Accretion region
Internal shock modelSpada et al. 2001
![Page 54: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
B = 0.6 - 0.5 δ = 17.8 - 12.3 γb = 550 - 600 Ballo et al. 2002
3C279EC + SSC
![Page 55: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Ghisellini Celotti & Costamante 2002
Physical Parameters along the Spectral Sequence
![Page 56: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Jet Power
where
![Page 57: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Blazars: Power and Matter Content
Maraschi & Tavecchio 2004
Pe < Ljet Protons Celotti & Ghisellini 2002
(but see Wardle 1998, Hirotani et al. 2000for pc-scale jets)
![Page 58: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Cygnus A radio galaxy (FR 2)
Carilli et al.
![Page 59: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
M87 Radio Galaxy (FR I)
Owen et al.
![Page 60: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
M87 (nearby AGN)
![Page 61: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
dec
0 RA 24
van Dokkum, Gawiser, Urry, Lira…
MUSYC: MUSYC: 1 deg2, UBVRIzJHK+NB, Spitzer, HST, Chandra, XMM, Galex, VLT, Magellan, Gemini, …
![Page 62: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Black hole demographics
• Most AGN are obscured (locally)• X-ray “background” from obscured AGN,
– 1043-1044 erg/s– z<1
• Peak BH accretion (& star formation) z~2• BH accretion:
– How many? (relation to local MBH)– When? (relation to galaxies)
~
![Page 63: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
AGN in Deep Surveys• Obscured AGN dominate population Treister et al. 2004, 2005, 2006a,b,c
– optical counts, N(z) well fit by 3:1 ratio, 50% AGN not in CDFs– fits X-ray background– fits IR counts; LAGN,IR ∼10x LGal,IR; low AGN % of IR extragalactic light– Integral survey constraints on Compton-thick AGN, BH accretion history– Obscured/unobscured ratio decreases with luminosity Barger et al. 2005– meta-analysis shows obs/unobs ratio increases with z
• Hard X-ray background dominated by obscured AGN Giacconi et al. 1979, Setti & Woltjer 1989, Madau et al. 1994, Comastri et al. 1995, Gilli et al. 2001, Worsley et al. 2005
– Only 60% 6-8keV XRBG resolved– Only 50% at 8 keV– Consistent with missing population of highly obscured AGN
• FIR Searches find candidates but – Dominated by star formation– Spectral cuts miss some bona fide AGN
![Page 64: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
EzequielEzequiel TreisterTreister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI), Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC), Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) 2004, ApJ, 616, 123 Hard X-ray LF & evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et al. 2004
• Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with – SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)– dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray) – infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002, Elitzur et al. 2003– L* host galaxy
• Geometry with obscured AGN = 3 x unobscured, at all z• Calculate expected redshift distribution – compare to measured
redshifts of GOODS AGN• Calculate expected optical magnitudes of X-ray sources in GOODS
fields – compare to GOODS HST data • Calculate expected N(S) for infrared sources – compare to GOODS
Spitzer data
![Page 65: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Dust emission models from Nenkova et al. 2002, Elitzur et al. 2003Simplest dust distribution that satisfies
NH = 1020 – 1024 cm-2
3:1 ratio (divide at 1022 cm-2)Random angles NH distribution
![Page 66: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
“EXO” Extreme X-ray-to-Optical AGN
B V R BVR
Z J K
KAB = 21.4 X-ray
ECDFS ID: 29
R-K = 7.88Blue Green Red Composite optical
Redder Near-IR Reddest Near-IR
•very high redshift AGN with z > 6, or•very obscured AGN w old/dusty host galaxies at z~2
![Page 67: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
EXOs in MUSYC ECDFS
![Page 68: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Determining the nature of EXOs
• No EXO has measured spectroscopic z• SEDs consistent w z∼2 or z>6• Near-infrared spectroscopy needed• Current Gemini time, VLT proposal
![Page 69: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
LBol=1043 LBol=1045
Woo et al. 2002a
Relation of MBH to AGN activity (?)
![Page 70: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Evolution of M/L ratio in host galaxies — same as normal galaxies
Woo et al. 2005Woo et al. 2005
![Page 71: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
kpc-scale jets: speed and power
Chandra detections allows us to constrainthe physical parameters of jets at kpc scale
In the case of powerful quasars models give:
Γ~3-10 P~1046 -1048 erg/sSupported by recent numerical simulations (Scheck et al. 2002), but see Wardle & Aaron 1997
Fast spine? (Chiaberge et al. 2000; Celotti et al. 2001)
![Page 72: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Jets and accretionExtraction of power from the rotating BH (Blandford & Znajek 1976) or from the disk (Blandford & Payne 1982)
In both cases the extractable power depends on the valueof the magnetic field close to the BH
But how the intensity and structure of the field are related to the accretion rate is a complex issue (e.g. Ghosh and Abramowicz 97, Livio et al. 99, Krolik 99, Meier 99)
![Page 73: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
A Unified Scenario
Blazars (from BL Lacs to FSRQs) and strong radio sources (from FRI to FRII) have similar engines.
The range in observed properties is determined by the accretion rate in Eddington units.
CRITICAL for high luminosity objectsSUBCRITICAL for low luminosity objects
![Page 74: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
The scenario explains
• Presence/absence of emission lines in high/low powerobjects (efficient/inefficient accretion disk)
• Spectral sequence : larger cooling due to BLR photons produces redder SEDs in high power blazars
(Bottcher and Dermer, 2002)
• Lower magnetic field and lower pressure in low power jets
• Cosmological evolution due to decrease of accretion rate with cosmic time (Cavaliere and D'Elia 2002)
• The scenario is testable by measuring the masses of central BHs in AGN
Barth et al. 2002, Falomo et al. 2002 Mkn 501: 109M
![Page 75: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Summary 1: jets at subpc to kpc scaleHigh power blazars have red SEDs due to low internal particle
energies; gamma-rays (GeV) are produced via the EC process.
Low power blazars have blue SEDs due to high internal particleenergies; gamma-rays (up to TeV) are produced via SSC.
The jet radiative efficiency is negligible close to the BH,it is 1-10% in the blazar emission region (100-1000 Rs) anddecreases further out (agreement with internal shock model).
X-ray knots resolved by CHANDRA in distant powerful jets aredue to IC on CMB. These jets are still relativistic on very large scales. Magnetic field compatible with free expansion.Jet pressure at X-ray knots comparable with external pressure.
![Page 76: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Summary ctd.: the jet disk connectionAt high luminosity Ljet ~ Ldisk and both efficiencies are ~10%.
Then Pjet ~ Pacc (not easy to achieve theoretically even formaximally rotating BH).
At low luminosity Ljet is larger then Ldisk. This can onlybe understood if the radiative efficiency of the disk is low.
The power scale, the spectral sequence, the emission lineproperties of blazars can be understood within a physicallyunified scenario where the main parameter is the accretion ratein Eddington units.
Measurements of the masses of central black holes in AGN cantest the proposed scenario.
![Page 77: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Van Duyne et al. 2006
Objects with hard Objects with hard (absorbed) XX--ray ray spectra:spectra:
(weak) AGN or galaxy in optical
luminous thermal infrared emission
AGN SEDs in GOODS
![Page 78: Meg Urry Yale University - UNAM](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032511/623569d9b3042441460df42a/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Van Duyne et al. 2006