Meeting report - unece.org€¦ · 1 Annual meeting of the United Nations Economic Commission for...
Transcript of Meeting report - unece.org€¦ · 1 Annual meeting of the United Nations Economic Commission for...
1
Annual meeting of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and
the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Forest Communicators Network
19-21 June 2012 – Antalya, Turkey
Meeting report
Item 1: Opening and welcome
1. Mr. Ali Gökçöl, Director at the Antalya Regional Directorate of Forestry opened the
meeting, welcomed participants and thanked them for coming to Antalya. A welcoming
speech was also delivered by Mr. Abdurrahman Kök, Deputy Head of the Foreign Relations,
Training and Research Department in the Forestry General Directorate of Turkey.
2. Welcoming speeches were also delivered by Ms. Eve Charles, Associate Economic Affairs
Officer at the UNECE/FAO Forestry and Timber Section and Mr. Ingwald Gschwandtl,
FCN Team Leader. Both Ms. Charles and Mr. Gschwandtl expressed their utmost gratitude
to Turkish colleagues for their exemplary involvement and extraordinary contribution to the
organization of this event and to their continuous support to the UNECE/FAO programme
of work in general.
Item 2: Adoption of agenda
3. The agenda of the meeting was adopted with some changes reflected in the final version
included in Annex 2. A list of participants is enclosed in Annex 3. All presentations and
further information on this meeting and the FCN are posted at
http://www.unece.org/forests/information/fcn.html
Item 3: The International Year of Forests 2011 - lessons learned and follow up plans
4. By showcasing a series of activities and success stories from the International Year of
Forests 2011, presenters highlighted the value of forests and the different actions people can
take to protect them and help contribute to their sustainable management. The International
Year of Forests proved to be a unique communication and outreach opportunity to raise
visibility on the interconnectivity between forests and people. Through their
presentations/movies, presenters explained how 2011 galvanised greater public participation
in forest-related activities. Various actors took part in forest-related activities - from local
communities to national, regional and international levels - to demonstrate effective ways to
sustainably manage forests.
2
Recommendations:
5. Throughout 2011, tremendous efforts were directed at raising awareness and visibility on
forests and their sustainable management. Many tools were developed using different means
of communication were developed, i.e. short movies, social media platforms, conferences,
exhibits, publications, competitions, awards etc. These products should be kept relevant and
serve as basis for future campaigns.
6. The International Year of Forests reached out to many sectors and created new partnerships
between governments, institutions, local communities, the private sector, and civil society.
Such partnerships should strengthen the joint delivery of messages, as well as facilitate
knowledge transfer, capacity enhancement, and technology development and transfer.
7. All presentations and communication outputs presented under this agenda item are available
at, http://www.unece.org/2012-fcn-meeting.html. Participants are encouraged to share these
outputs and refer to them for future reference and in other campaigns/events or
communication plans, e.g., European Forest Week 2013, World Forest Week 2012,
Germany Year for Sustainability 2013 etc.
Item 4: ECE/FAO related issues
Strategic Review of the joint ECE/FAO integrated Programme of Work
8. Ms. Charles briefed participants on the review of the UNECE/FAO joint programme of
work. Every four to five years, ECE/FAO examines its integrated programme of work on
timber and forestry to ensure that it still reflects the needs and priorities of member
countries, and responds to mandates given by the European Forestry Commission and the
Timber Committee.
9. Elements for a revised programme of work (PoW) were prepared by the joint Bureaux of the
TC and the EFC through a series of exchanges and a retreat held in Geneva in June 2012.
The new programme of work will consider suggestions from the assessment phase of the
2013 Strategic Review, including the survey of the forest work of UNECE and FAO in the
region and the assessment of the work of the ToS. Depending on the decision of the
Committee and the Commission, and to support the implementation of the new PoW, some
ToS might be renewed, while others may be discontinued or have their mandate revised to
better integrate the needs of the new programme.
10. A document presenting a preliminary version of the new PoW will be presented at the 70th
session of the Timber Committee, which is open to EFC delegates, and will invite feedback
that will be reflected in an updated version to be further discussed in the margin of the next
meeting of the ECE/FAO Working Party on Forest Statistics, Economics and Management
in April 2013 and/or a special session of the TC and EFC in late spring 2013, depending on
progress made at this TC session.
3
ECE/FAO Action plan (AP) for the forest sector in a Green Economy
11. Ms. Charles briefed participants on recent developments with regard to the AP. The AP was
prepared under the auspices of the UNECE Timber Committee and the FAO European
Forestry Commission, at the suggestion of their bureaux. It was developed on the basis of an
open consultation with member States and stakeholders, consolidated by the secretariat and
reviewed by a stakeholder meeting in May 2011. At their joint session in Antalya (Turkey)
in October 2011, the Committee and the Commission requested that the secretariat gather
further inputs to the Action Plan for the Forest Sector in Green Economy through a second
stakeholder meeting. The meeting was held in March.
12. The AP proposes a series of objectives for the forest sector in the ECE region, and possible
actions to achieve these objectives, to be implemented by international organisations,
governments of member states, the private sector, civil society and other stakeholders. It is
not a work programme for those bodies but includes actions to be carried out by all actors,
including governments, research, private sector and civil society and international
governmental and non-governmental organisations. Indeed the “possible actions” are not
attributed to any specific organisation or actor: many will probably be implemented by ad
hoc partnerships, and a mapping exercise may well be necessary to determine the
appropriate partners for each action. It is meant to inspire action and provide the basis for
many organizations’ plans and activities to focus on forests in a green economy.
13. The Committee and the Commission invite their member governments, as well as relevant
international partner organisations, to consider how they can contribute to the
implementation of the Action Plan. For their part, the Committee and the Commission will
incorporate relevant actions identified by the Action Plan into their own work programme
for 2014-2017 at their joint session in December 2013. The UNDP Turkey Country Office
expressed its interest and support the AP in Turkey, in collaboration with relevant
stakeholders.
14. At its next session in October 2012, the TC will review the current AP, provide additional
input and decide on further steps. More information on the AP is available on the ECE
website.
European Forest Week 2013 (EFW 2013)
15. The secretariat announced the consideration of the Committee and the Commission to
organize a second European Forest Week in the margins of the next TC/EFC joint session in
2013. Following the involvement of the FCN in the organization of the first EFW which
took place in 2008, the Bureaux requested the FCN to “develop and lead the implementation
of a communication and outreach strategy to raise awareness and understanding about the
EFW at local, regional and European levels” (ECE/TIM/2012/5).
16. Building on experiences made and lessons learned with the EFW 2008 participants
evaluated the communication potential of a second EFW in 2013 and the possible
4
contributions of the FCN to its organization. The results of this assessment are presented in
Annex 1 of this report.
Recommendations:
17. The meeting decided to set up a Task Force for the European Forest Week 2013 (EFW13),
which will provide communication expertise and advice to the organisers as far as time of
FCN experts allows and necessary resources are available. This Task Force will help
announce communication activities related to the EFW among UNECE countries. The Task
Force EFW13 will be led by the FCN Leader (Ingwald Gschwandtl, Austria) together with
the Deputy Leaders (Colin Morton, United Kingdom; Kai Lintunen, Finland; Tomass
Kotovics, Latvia; Pille Roivas, Estonia). The participation of the following experts was
strongly recommended by the team: Luisa Cabello (FOREST EUROPE), Maria de
Cristofaro (FAO), Eve Charles (UNECE/FAO), Gerda Wolfrum respectively Bob Burt
(IUFRO), Gerben Janse (Sweden), Marcus Kühling (Germany), Kamuran Özbay and Deniz
Tapan (Turkey), Alan Kocher (Switzerland). However, the task force will be open to any
members of the FCN willing to take part in the exercise.
Agenda item 5: Implementing the Strategic Framework for Forest Communication in
Europe
18. Mr. Gschwandtl briefed participants on the Strategic Framework for Forest Communication
in Europe which was finalised in September 2011 and launched at the Joint TC/EFC Session
‘Orman 2011’ in October 2011 in Antalya, Turkey. Mr. Gschwandtl explained that the
Framework aims to help achieving better informed decision making on matters relevant to
forests and forestry by closing the gap between perception and facts on forests and forestry
in the wider European region.
19. The framework offers communication objectives, common key messages and approaches,
designed to be used by governments, public and private sector institutions and organisations
and stakeholders at all levels, when formulating individual forest communication programs
and strategies. Geographically the framework addresses the European part of the UNECE
region. Out of the 56 Member States of the UNECE, experts from 36 countries and from 21
organisations participate in the Forest Communicators Network and were involved in some
form in the elaboration of this framework.
20. Even though participants welcomed the Strategy Framework, it was not clear what FCN
could do more in terms of follow up actions. Concerns were expressed as regards the lack of
visibility and recognition of the framework within the TC and EFC community.
Recommendations:
21. Participants requested the objective of the Strategic Framework to be clarified and
introduced in a more comprehensive way.
5
22. Participants were encouraged to share the strategic framework among interested
stakeholders. The Strategic framework is available online at,
http://www.unece.org/forests/information/fcn.html
Agenda item 6: Best Practices in Forest Communication
23. Participants shared examples of best practices in forest communication. The communication
practices presented were developed at different institutional levels and for different
audiences. They showed how much efforts are directed at improving communication within
and outside the forest sector at both national and international levels (e.g. state departments
for forestry, state forest services, forest educational and research institutes, forest sector
institutions, international organizations, NGOs etc.). These examples confirmed the variety
of communications means available to engage people in forest activities and to increase their
understanding of forests and the forest sector.
24. Discussions following the presentations indicated however a lack of common message for
the forest sector in general. More efforts should be directed at lobbying and delivering key
concerted messages to civil society. The lack of a concerted forest communication approach
makes it difficult to come to coordinated action among forest sector actors. A more active
exchange of information on best practices in forest communication between national as well
as European level actors, and increased coordination of communication efforts is desired by
industry, forest owners as well as policy-makers.
25. The group will capitalize on existing material and build on lessons learned and success
stories of FCN participants.
26. The increasing need to strengthen communication within the forest sector as well as cross-
sectoral communication was recalled by members of the team.
Recommendations:
27. It was recommended the FCN involve other sectors in their work. The participation of the
private sector and Communication Experts from different areas of forestry and the forest
industry would be beneficial.
Agenda item 7: Update on international forest policy developments
28. Mr. Ingwald Gschwandtl gave an overview on recent developments in international policy
processes relevant to forests. He informed about outcomes of a follow up to the Durban
Climate Conference, the preparations for the 10th session of the United Nations Forum on
Forests, to be held in April 2013 in Istanbul/Turkey, and the main outcomes of the Rio+20
Summit. He also reflected on on-going forest related EU activities, in particular the work on
renewing the EU Forest Strategy, the EU initiative on forest monitoring and information and
the proposal for an EU-Decision on LULUCF (Land Use, Land Use Change and Forests in
the context of climate change). Mr. Marcus Kühling complemented the presentation with
information and views from Germany.
6
Agenda item 8: Communicating the FOREST EUROPE Process and the intergovernmental
negotiations for a legally binding agreement on forests in Europe
29. Ms. Luisa Cabello presented the FOREST EUROPE communication strategy, underlining
the need to engage the forest political and technical community and the media in explaining
the key principles and objectives of Sustainable Forest Management. Ms. Cabello explained
FOREST EUROPE communication priorities include communicating the negotiating
process of a possible Legally Binding Agreement on Forests in Europe and the main tasks
described in the Oslo Mandate. Ms. Cabello’s presentation is available at,
http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/WA5/Luisa_Forest_Europe.pdf.
Agenda item 9: New impetus/challenges/value for the work of the FCN, including through
its web site and social media, as well as through helping to establish
networks in other world regions
30. Ms. Maria De Cristofaro and Mr. Colin Morton briefed participants on an initiative led by
FAO to support emerging regional forest communicators’ networks and strengthen links
between these networks. Building on FCN products and expertise a successful workshop
was already conducted in 2011 in Lima/Peru for Latin American countries. A second
regional forest communication workshop was organized in Africa in June 2012. One goal of
this initiative is to run a web based platform on which all communicators can share their
information from recommendations to videos and articles etc. FAO – (Addis Abeba) will
provide support by taking over the secretariat for at least one year and promote/run the
website.
31. In 2011, during the APFW in China FAO explored the interest of countries in the region to
organize a communication network in the region and the feedback was again very positive
so that FAO is now looking into the possibility to organize a regional forest communication
workshop in Asia most likely in January 2013.
32. Based on the positive feedback received so far, FAO intends to further support those
emerging regional networks and also strengthen links between them. Ms. De Cristofaro
proposed to organize a small workshop of representatives of the regional communicators’
networks to exchange experiences and jointly identify ways and possible means to
strengthen support and build capacity at regional levels. She added FAO could host such a
meeting in 2013. She recommended that given its long experience and knowledge, the
UNECE/FAO FCN would be a key partner in this effort.
7
Agenda item 10: FCN business
Decisions taken:
33. The FCN intends to provide communication expertise and advice upon request by relevant
organisations and institutions also beyond the ECE region, as far as expert time allows and
necessary resources are available and within the established mandate of the ToR.
34. The FCN intends to continue working with FAO in building up forest communicators
networks in other world regions. The meeting recommended the organization of a joint
workshop with other regional FCNs, ideally in 2013.
35. The FCN will also consider the request received, to give communication advice for the
Mediterranean Forest Week to be held in Algeria in March 2013.
36. Ms. Pille Roivas from Estonia was elected FCN Deputy Leader, to replace Ms. Marta
Gaworska, CEPF, who due to new responsibilities will have to step down from this position.
Mr. Gschwandtl thanked Ms. Gaworska for her proactive role and supportive involvement in
FCN activities over the years.
37. A FCN Task Force on improving Team Operations was established, to be led by Ms. Pille
Roivas. This Task Force will work towards improving internal FCN interaction and help
setting up the agenda for the next meeting.
38. The next annual meeting of the FCN will be held in May 2013 in Estonia.
8
Annex 1.
Strategic considerations on the communication potential of a
European Forest Week in 2013 and the role the FCN could play
Background:
The Bureaux of the ECE-Timber Committee and the FAO European Forestry Commission are
planning to organise a ‘European Forest Week in 2013’ (EFW13) in parallel with the Joint Session
of the ECE Timber Committee and FAO European Forestry Commission, scheduled for December
2013 in Rovaniemi, Finland in 2013 should provide the point of crystallisation.
The FCN was asked to “develop and lead the implementation of a communication and outreach
strategy to raise awareness and understanding about the EFW at local, regional and European
levels” (ECE/TIM/2012/5).
The FCN Mandate 2008-2013 expects among many other things ‘follow up to the Pan-European
Forest Week 2008 (follow up media work; evaluation of achievements and lessons learned;
improved concept for future activities)’.
Therefore, the European Forest Week 2008 (EFW08), organised in conjunction with the Joint ECE-
Timber Committee and FAO European Forestry Commission Meeting in October 2008 in Rome,
serves as a reference event.
The Strategic Framework for Forest Communication in Europe, elaborated by the FCN and
launched by the Timber Committee and the European Forestry Commission at their Orman 2011
Meeting in Antalya/Turkey in October 2011 recommends to ‘consider establishing a regular
collaborative communication campaign throughout Europe with time wise and message wise
concerted actions at all levels’.
Against this background the FCN Meeting in June 2012 in Antalya/Turkey carried out the following
analytical tasks:
1. Assess experiences made and lessons learned with EFW08
2. Analyse Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) of EFW13
3. Raise open questions to be clarified by the organisers
4. Discuss possible role of FCN
9
1. Experiences made and Lessons Learned with the European Forest Week 2008
Achievements
A huge number (some 120) of different, time wise (to some extend) concentrated
activities around one central message carried out in many (around 30) countries
throughout the pan-European region
A concerted action of several relevant organisations and institutions (ECE, FAO,
FOREST EUROPE e. a.) at European level
Success factors
one common message
a Logo
a central, interactive web-site
one central player (FAO)
Limitations/Hindrances
no broad outreach of the central European activity (Rome event did not reach beyond
the inner circles)
no significant event at EU level
no punchy slogan
Role of FCN
gave strategic communication advice to organisers
developed common message
gave advice on logo design and web performance
raised awareness with national level actors
involvement in preparations made possible through travel support for selected FCN
experts
10
2. European Forest Week 2013 SWOT Analyses
Strength Weaknesses
Many possible partners at different
levels “Stronger together”
Global and national context
Forestry structure rooted to the base
(local level, close to people)
Existing networks
Institutional fragmentation (is there one
central focal point with capacity to
coordinate?)
Lack of legal entry point for forest
activities at international/European
level
Limited resources
Low recognition due to information
overkill and proliferation of declared
days, weeks, years)
National/regional differences
Global/international events hardly reach
local level
Opportunities Threats
Focussed dialogues on specific forest
and forestry issues, including forest
based products and servıces, wood
energy, and people issues, e.g.
communıty psychology
Promoting on a wider scale the
utilization of forest resources
Attracting attention for major region
specific challenges (e.g. forest fire
prevention)
Linking forest issues with “Rio +20”-
outcomes at European level
Involve politicians (e.g. European
Parliament)
Support for process towards a legally
binding agreement on forests in Europe
Concerted actions around one central
message throughout the region
Use EFW as an umbrella wıth natıonal
events followıng
A hook for approaching donors
Joint action pools / cooperation’s
among countries and organizations
Reaching people and decision makers
Strong other issues, processes and
events competing for public attention
Time wise competing events (e.g. COP
of UNFCCC; Ministerial Conference on
lba)
Not sufficient political/material support
Unrealistic expectations
Tendency of wanting to include
everything (no clear message)
Winter season hinders outdoor activities
Christmas shopping period distracts
media and people
11
Targeting mass media with SFM in a
tangible, practical way (stories)
Capitalising on simple messages: e.g.
“What would everyday life be without
wood??”
Using a few specific key messages
(“kiss”)
Using lively images
Using Christmas trees as
communications hook
Joining forces for a common (TV) spot
A common slogan (like in 2008 “Save
the planet, use the forests”)
Seeking support of opinion leaders to
get media attention
Selecting responsible persons to
represent the cause
Using existing networks
Using media hooks and capitalising on
other communication channels (e.g.
major international events like sports)
Generating a whole week of media
coverage
Increasing the confidence of the forest
sector in its professional
communications capacity
12
3. European Forest Week 2013: Questions to be clarified by the organisers
To allow a more focussed and in-depth analyses as basis for some strategic communication
recommendations the following questions need to be clarified:
What are the Business Objectives of the European Forest Week 2013?
What is it for, what should it achieve, what should be different after the week?
Who declares the EFW13, who ‘chaperones’ it?
Who will be the central organiser/coordinator?
What are the communication objectives?
What should communication achieve to support the business objectives? (Communication
objectives should be realistic, achievable and measureable)
Who is the key target audience?
What is the key message to be conveyed?
Who will be the communicators?
What are the available means and resources for communications?
13
4. European Forest Week 2013: Possible role of FCN
What the FCN could do
Provide expertise and advice, i. p. on
- communication objectives
- messaging
- visual appearance
- web and social media performance
Promotion through ‘spreadıng the word’ into national contexts
Collect e.g. 6 good tangible stories throughout Europe
Recommend clever communication channels (e.g. airline magazines)
Form a task force for further development
What the FCN cannot do
Act operationally like an institution or agency
(the FCN gathers a wealth of experience and expertise, but it is just a network of experts, who
have their real, full time occupations somewhere else, and there are no regular resources
allocated to FCNs activities)
Further considerations
Resource and time constraints will limit the possibilities of involving FCN experts
It will be important to
- motivate many people, organisations and institutions to be (more) active
- present tangible stories from local levels (best practice)
- use the institutional capacity of FAO and others
- develop a cooperation strategy (synergies)
- make more and better use of social media (use ‘billions of brains’)
14
Annex 2
Final Programme
MONDAY 18 June 2012 Arrival of participants
TUESDAY 19 June 2012 TIME No. ITEM
09:00 1 Welcome, opening and introduction
Ali Gökçöl Antalya Forest Regional Director Abdurrahman Kök Forestry General Directorate- Deputy Head of Foreign Relations Training & Research Department Eve Charles UNECE/FAO Ingwald Gschwandtl FCN Leader
09:25 2 Adoption of Agenda
09:30 3 The International Year of Forests 2011
lessons learned and follow up plans
Brief presentations by countries and organisations
Message from the UNFF Secretariat
Maria De Cristofaro FAO
Gerda Wolfrum IUFRO
Tamas Szedlak European Commission
Andrea Moser Austria
Kai Lintunen Finland
Marcus Kühling Germany
Pille Roivas Estonia
Bob Burt IUFRO
Araceli Munoz PEFC, Spain
Eve Charles UNECE/FAO Secretariat
10:30 Coffee break
11:00 3 The International Year of Forests 2011
lessons learned and follow up plans – Continuation
11:30 4 ECE/FAO related issues
Strategic Review of the Joint ECE/FAO integrated Programme of Work
FAO/ECE Action Plan on Green Economy
SWOT analyses on communication potential and challenges of a possible ‘European Forest Week 2013’
Presentations and moderation by Eve Charles ECE/FAO Secretariat, and Ingwald Gschwandtl FCN Leader
12:30 Lunch
14:00 5 Implementing the
Strategic Framework for Forest Communication in Europe
Brief reflections by countries and organisations on what has been done and what should happen
15
14:30
6 Best Practices in Forest Communication
Brief presentations by member states and organisations Alan Kocher (Switzerland) Movie film “The mysteries of our forests” Results of newest national public survey on forests Kai Lintunen (Finland) Results of newest national public survey on forests Jolanta Stankievicz (Poland) Promotional campaign of the State Forests Bob Burt (Canada) IUFRO Spotlight Initiative Christine Farcy, Coralie Meurice, Pr. Thierry De Smedt and Pr. Pierre Fastrez (Belgium) Tree and Forest policies and communication Eve Charles (ECE/FAO-Secretariat), and Thomas Baschny (Austria) State of Europe’s Forests: What YOUth can do Thomas Baschny (Austria) Forest Pedagogics Strategy – Report of FCN Sub-Group Gerben Janse (Sweden) Information platform ‘My Forest’ Marcus Kühling (Germany) Meeting Point FOREST (Plattform Treffpunkt WALD) Araceli Munoz, (PEFC Spain) “Ecoemplea Sustainable Cork” Deniz Tapan (UNDP Turkey) “Kure Mountains National Park”
15:30 Coffee break
16:00 -
17:00
6 Best Practices in Forest Communication – Continuation
End of first day
WEDNESDAY 20 June 2012 – FIELD TRIP Visit to the newly built International training center on Forest Fires in Antalya followed by a trip to the spectacular Lower Düden Waterfall located off Antalya City Cliffs.
16
THURSDAY 21 June 2012 TIME No. ITEM
09:00 7 Up-date on international forest policy developments
Brief overview by
Ingwald Gschwandtl Austria
Marcus Kühling Germany and other participants
09:30 8 Communicating the FOREST EUROPE Process and the
intergovernmental negotiations for a legally binding agreement on
forests in Europe
Presentation by Luisa Cabello FOREST EUROPE Liaison Unit Madrid
10:30 Coffee break
11:00 9 New impetus/challenges/value for the work of the FCN,
including through its web site and social media,
as well as through helping to establish networks in
other world regions
Introduction and moderation by
Colin Morton United Kingdom, and
Maria De Cristofaro FAO 12:30 Lunch
14:00 9 New impetus/challenges/value for the work of the FCN
Continuation
15:00 Coffee break
15:30 10 FCN business
o Future Mandate and Officers o Next FCN meetings o Other issues
o Up-date on Eduforest Network of Forestry Training Centres - Alan Kocher Switzerland
o Up-date on IUFRO Task Force ‘Communicating Forest Science’ – Gerben Janse Sweden
17:00 Closure of Meeting
Departure - Transfer of participants to Antalya Airport
FRIDAY 22 June 2012 Departure – Transfer of Participants to Antalya Airport
Meeting Venue Dedeman Antalya Hotel & Convention Center, Antalya, Turkey
Working language The meeting was conducted in English. Simultaneous interpretation into Turkish was available.
17
Annex 3
List of Participants
Country Organization Full name Email
Austria Federal Ministry Director
– Forest Policy and
Information
Ingwald
GSCHWANDTL
ingwald.gschwandtl@lebensministeri
um.at
Austria IUFRO ( Headquarters )
Austria
Gerda WOLFRUM [email protected]
Austria IUFRO (Consultant) Robert BURT [email protected]
Austria Federal Ministry of
Agriculture
Thomas BASCHNY Thomas.Baschny@lebensministerium
.at
Sweden Swedish Forest Agency Gerben JANSE [email protected]
Austria BMLFUW Andrea MOSER [email protected]
Belgium Université catholique de
Louvain Belgium
Christine FARCY [email protected]
Belgium Université catholique de
Louvain Belgium
Pierre FASTREZ [email protected]
Belgium Université catholique de
Louvain Belgium
Coralie MEURICE [email protected]
Belgium Université catholique de
Louvain Belgium /professor
Thierry DE SMEDT [email protected]
Belgium European Commission, Tamas SZEDLAK [email protected]
ECE/FAO UNECE/FAO Forestry and
Timber Section
Eve CHARLES [email protected]
Estonia Ministry of Environment Pille ROİVAS [email protected]
Finland Finnish Forest Association Lintunen KAİ [email protected]
France Unıversıte De Lorraıne,
France
Lormant FRANCOIS [email protected]
Germany German Forest Society Marcus KÜHLİNG [email protected]
Latvia LVM, Latvia’s State
Forests
Tomass KOTOVİCS [email protected]
Poland Information Centre of the
State Forests/
Promotion Manager
Jolanta
STANKIEWICZ
Poland Ministry of
Environment/Poland
Anna ŻORNACZUK-
ŁUBA
Rome FAO Department Maria De
CRİSTOFARO
Meeting of the UNECE/FAO Forest Communicators Network
19-21 June 2012
Antalya, Turkey
18
Spain FOREST EUROPE,
Liaison Unit Madrid
Luisa CABELLO [email protected]
Spain FOREST EUROPE
Liaison Unit Madrid
Isabel GALİANA [email protected]
Spain PEFC Spain Araceli MUNOZ [email protected]
Spain USSE/SPAİN Inazio MARTINEZ
DE ARANO
Switzerla
nd
Federal Office for
Environment
Alan E. KOCHER [email protected]
Turkey UNDP Nurettin
ÖZBAĞDATLI
Turkey UNDP Deniz TAPAN [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
ABdurrahman KÖK [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
Musa KAYA [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
Nihat KARAKAYA [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
Mustafa GÜZEL [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
Soner TÜMÜKLÜ [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
Kamuran ÖZBAY [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
Metin GÜLTEKİN [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
YAKUP KILIÇ [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
Emin ŞİMDİ [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
Aydoğan TÜREDİ [email protected]
Turkey General Directorate of
Forestry
Ahmet KISA [email protected]
Turkey SAFRI/ANTALYA Ufuk COSGUN [email protected]
Turkey SAFRI/ANTALYA Memhet
CALIKOGLU
Turkey Turkish interpreter Diler KÜTÜK [email protected]
Turkey Turkish interpreter Deniz Yetkin
KAYHAN
UK Forestry commission Morton COLLİN [email protected]