Meeting - Executive Committeetrca.on.ca/dotAsset/182059.pdf · a replacement concrete patio and...

1

Executive Committee Meeting #1/14

Chair:Vice Chair:Members: Ben Cachola

Ronald ChopowickGlenn De BaeremaekerMichael Di BiaseJack HeathColleen JordanGloria Lindsay LubyMike MattosJim ToveyRichard Whitehead

March 7, 20149:30 A.M

WESTON ROOM B, BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE

AGENDA

EX1. MINUTES OF MEETING #12/13, HELD ON FEBRUARY 7, 2014http://trca.on.ca/dotAsset/181044.pdf

EX2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES

EX3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF

EX4. DELEGATIONS

EX5. PRESENTATIONS

EX6. CORRESPONDENCE

2

EX7. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

EX7.1 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of YorkSanmike Construction Ltd.CFN 50485 5

EX7.2 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of YorkBerkley Homes Ltd.CFN 50486 8

EX7.3 JULY 8TH, 2013 STORM DAMAGE PHASE 2 DETAILED SLOPE STABILITY AND EROSION RISK ASSESSMENTSContract #RSD14-03 - Area I 11

EX8. SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION

EX8.1 IRE-YONGE DEVELOPERS INC., 4155 YONGE STREETProposed Official Plan, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications – Ontario Municipal Board OrderCity of Toronto, North York Community Council Area 15

EX8.2 ACOUSTIC DOPPLER CURRENT PROFILER PROGRAM IN HUMBER BAYTechnical Support Services 20

EX8.3 JULY 8th, 2013 STORM DAMAGE PHASE 2 DETAILED SLOPE STABILITY AND EROSION RISK ASSESSMENTSContract #RSD14-03 - Area E, Contract #RSD14-03 - Area F, Contract #RSD14-03 – Area G, Contract #RSD14-03 - Area H and Contract #RSD14-03 – Area J 22

EX9. SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD

EX10. ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06

PERMIT APPLICATIONS EX10.1 - EX10.6 ARE MAJOR APPLICATIONS

Applications that involved a more complex suite of technical studies to demonstrate consistency with policies; applications that cover a significant geographic area (e.g. subdivisions, stormwater management ponds), extensive modifications to the landscape, major infrastructure projects, emergency works, resolution of violations/after the fact permits, trail construction

3

CITY OF BRAMPTON

EX10.1 AYR MOTORS EXPRESSTo construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure and site grade on Lot F, Plan 636, (317 Orenda Road), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Ayr Motors Express. The purpose is to undertake works within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed in order to facilitate the demolition of the northern portion of the existing industrial building, construct a new office area, new asphalt for the parking area, interior renovations and replacement of windows. 28

CITY OF TORONTO [ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]

EX10.2 82 TREELAWN PARKWAYTo construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, change a building or structure so that it alters its use or potential use, increases its size or increases the number of dwelling units and site grade on Lot 194, Plan 3309, (82 Treelawn Parkway), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed. The purpose is to construct a new two-storey single family detached dwelling and inground pool, fountain and associated landscaping. 31

CITY OF TORONTO [NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]

EX10.3 68 BLYTH HILL ROADTo construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot 12, Plan 3833 YORK, (68 Blyth Hill Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed. The purpose is to acknowledge the construction of a replacement concrete patio and reinforcement of the existing retaining wall in the rear yard at 68 Blyth Hill Road in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). The previous patio and the existing retaining wall were damaged in the July 8th, 2013 storm. 33

CITY OF TORONTO [TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]

EX10.4 CITY OF TORONTOTo construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade, and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere, at Chorley Park between Summerhill Avenue and Roxborough Drive, east of Douglas Drive, in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to construct a switchback trail connection. Works will involve construction of a new switchback trail connection and restoration of the existing trails to a natural state. No in-water works are within the scope of this project. 36

4

CITY OF VAUGHAN

EX10.5 1678575 ONTARIO INC. O/A AMICORP DEVELOPMENTS INC.To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot PARCEL G & H, Plan RP 449, (86 Woodbridge Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1678575 Ontario Inc. o/a Amicorp Developments Inc. The purpose is to conduct site grading on the subject lands, in order to develop a 6-storey residential condominium building with 125 units. 38

CITY OF AJAX

EX10.6 DELCO HOMES INCTo construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Part Lot 15, Concession 1, (Kingston Road and Randall Drive), in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Delco Homes Inc. The purpose is to excavate, grade and construct twenty-nine row townhouses and associated rear patios and decks. 41

EX11. NEW BUSINESS

NEXT MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/14, TO BE HELD ON APRIL 11, 2014 AT 9:30 A.M. IN WESTON ROOM B, BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE

Brian DenneyChief Administrative Officer

/jr

5

Item EX7.1TO: Chair and Members of the Executive Committee

Meeting #1/14, March 7, 2014

FROM: Mike Fenning, Senior Manager, Property Services

RE: GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of YorkSanmike Construction Ltd.CFN 50485

____________________________________________________________________________KEY ISSUEAcquisition of property located south of Elgin Mills Road East and east of Bayview Avenue, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River watershed.

RECOMMENDATION

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.868 hectares (4.616 acres), more or less, of vacant land being part of Lot 25, Concession 2, and designated as Blocks 2 and 3 on a Draft Plan of subdivision prepared by KRCMAR Surveyors Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Job No. 11-261, dated October 22, 2013, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located south of Elgin Mills Road East and east of Bayview Avenue be purchased from Sanmike Construction Ltd.;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents.

BACKGROUNDResolution #A94/10 at Authority Meeting #5/10, held on June 25, 2010, approved the Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015.

Negotiations have been conducted with Paul Rycroft, Land Development Consultant, who acts as agent on behalf of Sanmike Construction Ltd.

As part of the conveyance, an access easement will be granted in favor of TRCA through the internal road and Common Elements Block at the end of the cul-de-sac for the future maintenance of these subject lands.

6

Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.

RATIONALEThe subject property falls within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge River watershed as outlined in the approved Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015.

Through the review of residential subdivision 19T(R)-06003, TRCA Planning and Development staff established the limits of the open space land (i.e. Blocks 2 and 3 on Draft Plan of Subdivision) which is situated partially within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and a portion of the valley corridor of headwater tributaries of the Rouge River at this location.

TAXES AND MAINTENANCEBased on TRCA's preliminary review of the environmental criteria for lands that are eligible to receive a property tax exemption under the Provincial Land Tax Incentive Program and TRCA's own field data, it would appear that all of the subject property may be eligible for exemption for the 2015 taxation year. Based on TRCA-owned property in the vicinity, taxes without the exemption are estimated to be $1,200 for 2014. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact TRCA's maintenance costs at this location.

FINANCIAL DETAILSFunds for the costs related to his purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account.

Report prepared by: Joseph Nickerson, extension 5620Emails: [email protected] Information contact: Joseph Nickerson, extension 5620Jae Truesdell, extension 3247Emails: [email protected]: January 27, 2014Attachments: 1

7

Attachment 1

8



FROM: Mike Fenning, Senior Manager, Property Services

RE: GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of YorkBerkley Homes Ltd.CFN 50486

____________________________________________________________________________KEY ISSUEAcquisition of property located north of Nashville Road and west of Regional Road 27, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed.

RECOMMENDATION

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 3.336 hectares (8.244 acres), more or less, of vacant land being part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 8, and designated as Blocks 49 and 50 on a Draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Nanfara & NG Surveyors Inc., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Project No. 20080243M1, dated September 24, 2013, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, located to the north of Nashville Road and west of Regional Road 27 be purchased from Berkley Homes Ltd.;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

That Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and execution of documents.

BACKGROUNDResolution #A94/10 at Authority Meeting #5/10, held on June 25, 2010, approved the Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015.

Negotiations have been conducted with Nadia Zuccaro, of EMC Group Ltd., acting as agent on behalf of the Berkley Homes Ltd.

Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.

9

RATIONALEThe subject property falls within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Humber River watershed as outlined in the approved Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015. Through the review of residential subdivision 19T-84076, TRCA Planning and Development staff established the limits of the open space land (i.e. Blocks 49 and 50 on Draft Plan of Subdivision) which is situated partially within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and the valley corridor of the Humber River at this location.

TAXES AND MAINTENANCEBased on TRCA's preliminary review of the environmental criteria for lands that are eligible to receive a property tax exemption under the Provincial Land Tax Incentive Program, it would appear that all of the subject property may be eligible for exemption for the 2015 taxation year. The adjacent TRCA-owned parcels are already exempt as significant areas of natural heritage under the provisions of the Provincial Policy Statement as issued under the Planning Act. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact TRCA's maintenance costs at this location.

FINANCIAL DETAILSFunds for the costs related to his purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account.

Report prepared by: Joseph Nickerson, extension 5620Emails: [email protected] Information contact: Joseph Nickerson, extension 5620;

Jae Truesdell extension 5247Emails: [email protected]: January 28, 2014Attachments: 1

10

Attachment 1

11



FROM: Nick Saccone, Director, Restoration Services

RE: JULY 8TH, 2013 STORM DAMAGE PHASE 2 DETAILED SLOPE STABILITY AND EROSION RISK ASSESSMENTSContract #RSD14-03 - Area I

___________________________________________________________________________KEY ISSUEAward of Contract #RSD14-03 - Area I for completion of detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessments for properties located in Area I categorized as medium-high to high priority sites following the July 8th, 2013 storm event.

RECOMMENDATION

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the significant rainfall event of July 8th, 2013 caused very high flows and resulting erosion damages along a number of river systems, creating new sites where existing development and infrastructure is endangered, particularly within the City of Toronto;

AND WHEREAS the preliminary assessment process recommended detailed geotechnical investigations of 147 additional properties be carried out as part of the July 8th, 2013 storm damage response efforts to confirm the full extent of risk;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT Contract #RSD14-03 - Area I to complete detailed assessments for 57 properties within the West Humber River subwatershed be awarded to Terraprobe Inc. at a total cost not to exceed $214,714.25 plus a contingency allowance of $200,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST, it being the highest ranked proposal meeting TRCA specifications for Area I;

AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such actions as is necessary to implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents.

BACKGROUNDIn the early evening hours of July 8

th

, 2013 a severe thunderstorm rolled through the Toronto area, bringing large amounts of rainfall over the span of a few hours to the west end and downtown areas of the city. This intense downpour of precipitation not only resulted in extensive flooding of major roadways and transit infrastructure, but also caused significant damage to the river and valley systems and park amenities, water infrastructure and private properties found in and bounding these natural areas.

12

On July 26, 2013 staff brought a report to Authority Meeting #6/13 providing an overview of the information collected to date with recommendations for further action. At that time, 141 properties had been inspected, six of which were initially flagged as critical (three were later downgraded to high priority following third-party reviews), 20 were flagged as high priority, 33 were flagged as medium priority, 66 as low priority and 16 sites with a priority of “none”, the latter being primarily recently completed TRCA erosion control sites where no appreciable damage was observed following the storm event, or where the damage was not related to river flooding or land erosion (e.g., basement flooding). At that time, preliminary damage estimates were in the order of $28 million.

A follow up report was brought to Authority Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014 noting that as of January 20, 2014 staff has inspected 482 sites reportedly damaged during the July 8th storm event. The report also included but was not limited to providing updated preliminary estimates of the damage observed, now in the order of $37 million across all regions; and a request for approval to proceed with a list of projects using 2014-2015 enhanced funding from the City of Toronto and 2014-2015 core erosion management funding from the Region of Peel, subject to all necessary approvals and confirmation of available funding. Approval to proceed with the aforementioned was granted by the Authority under Resolution #A225/13.

Within this list of projects included a second phase of detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessments for an additional 147 properties inspected by TRCA and/or Terraprobe Inc. that ranked as medium-high or high by TRCA upon completion of the preliminary assessment phase. As with the first phase of detailed assessments, which grouped properties by watershed or subwatershed as Area A, B, C or D, the phase 2 properties were grouped accordingly as Area E, F, G, H, I or J. Area I is as follows:

Area I: West Humber River - City of Toronto

5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55,

57, 59, 61 Moon Valley Drive

87, 93, 101 Bankview Circle

22, 24 Bucksburn Road

49 Collingdale Road

32, 38, 40 Esther Lorrie Drive

30 Grovetree Road

21, 23 Hackmore Avenue

4 Hardwood Gate

33, 35 Lakeland Drive

600 Rexdale Boulevard

75 Strathavon Drive

28, 30, 62, 64 Topbank Drive

22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, Watercliffe Road

13

RATIONALETRCA requires the services of qualified geotechnical engineering firms to complete the detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessments of the above noted properties in Areas E - J in order to determine the full extent of risk and inform the priority ranking for potential stabilization works, subject to all necessary approvals and funding.

A Request for Proposal (RFP) was publicly advertised on the procurement website Biddingo.com on January 22, 2014, with expressions of interest subsequently received from seven qualified consulting firms as follows:

Sarafinchin Associates;

Terraprobe Inc.;

Coffey Geotechnics;

Soil Probe;

Cole Engineering / Soil Eng.;

LVM Consulting;

AMEC Environmental.

Five proposals were received by the deadline and opened by TRCA staff (Nick Saccone, Judith Reda and Lori Colussi) on February 6, 2014, and revised pricing received by TRCA staff (Moranne McDonnell, Patricia Newland and Patrick White) on February 18, 2014 with the following final results:

Company Total Cost(Plus HST)

Sarafinchin $211,536.00Terraprobe $214,714.25Coffey Geotech. $479,500.00Soil Probe $343,840.00Cole Eng. & Soil Eng. No BidLVM Consulting No BidAMEX Environmental No Bid

To aid in determining the preferred consulting firm to undertake the assignment, proposals were evaluated by TRCA’s Selection Committee based upon the criteria stated in the RFP as follows:

Criteria Sarafinchin Terraprobe Coffey Geotech.

Soil Probe Cole Eng. + Soil Eng

Expertise and Qualifications (30%)

30% 30% 27% 27% 24%

Understanding of work (25%)

25% 25% 23% 13% 20%

Conformance with terms of RFP (10%)

10% 10% 10% 10% 10%

Expertise and availability of key personnel (15%)

15% 15% 15% 15% 15%

Reasonableness of cost (20%)

16% 18% 4% 8% 16%

Total (100%) 96% 98% 79% 73% 85%

14

The Selection Committee determined that Terraprobe Inc. and Sarafinchin Associates Ltd. were the strongest candidates for completing Contract #RSD14-03, based on previous experience with the scope and magnitude of works required. Coffey Geotechnics provided a solid proposal with a clear understanding of the assignment and mechanisms in place to tackle the magnitude of the assignment required, however there was a significant variation in price over that of the other consulting firms for a comparable scope of services, the reason for which could not be determined by the Selection Committee. Cole Engineering submitted a very good proposal but has less demonstrated experience than Terraprobe Inc. and Sarafinchin Associates Limited. Soil Probe submitted a good proposal but did not conform with a key requirement of the RFP and the pricing was significantly higher than the most competitive bid.

Based on the scores, and the need to expedite the results to align with secured and anticipated funding, TRCA staff recommend that Contract #RSD14-03 be awarded to multiple consulting firms with a distribution of work based the best value for services and TRCA's confidence in the consulting firm's ability to complete the work in the timeframe specified in the RFP. Taking the aforementioned into consideration, TRCA staff recommend that Contract #RSD14-03 - Area I be awarded to Terraprobe Inc. at a total cost not to exceed $214,714.25 plus a contingency allowance of $200,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the highest ranked proposal meeting TRCA specifications for that Area. TRCA staff has recommended that the contingency allowance for Area I be carried at $200,000 to complete detailed investigations for up to 20 additional properties on Bankview Circle and Topbank Drive, which have properties with no reported failures, but which are situated between others included in the detailed study that may potentially also be at risk over the long term.

FINANCIAL DETAILSThe upset limit for Contract #RSD14-03 - Area I with the recommended contingency is $414,714.25 plus HST.

Funding for the completion of Area I is available from 2014 enhanced funding from the City of Toronto within account 133-01.

Report prepared by: Patricia Newland, 416-392-9690Emails: [email protected] Information contact: Patricia Newland, 416-392-9690Emails: [email protected]: February 26, 2014

15



FROM: Carolyn Woodland, Director, Planning and Development

RE: IRE-YONGE DEVELOPERS INC., 4155 YONGE STREETProposed Official Plan, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications – Ontario Municipal Board OrderCity of Toronto, North York Community Council Area

____________________________________________________________________________KEY ISSUEReport and recommendations in response to an Ontario Municipal Board decision with respect to development within a valley corridor and the natural heritage system.

RECOMMENDATION

WHEREAS IRE Yonge Developer’s Inc. applied to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for a permit under Ontario Regulation 166/06 to develop within a Regulated Area of the Don River watershed to facilitate the construction of a 12-storey residential building at 4155 Yonge Street, City of Toronto;

AND WHEREAS TRCA Planning and Development staff recommended refusal of the TRCA permit as the proposal would negatively impact the conservation of land and the proposal was inconsistent with existing municipal planning approvals;

AND WHEREAS the TRCA Hearing Board approved the Ontario Regulation 166/06 permit application;

AND WHEREAS IRE Yonge Developer’s Inc. applied to the City of Toronto for Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control approvals under the Planning Act to facilitate the same development as approved by the TRCA Hearing Board;

AND WHEREAS City of Toronto City Planning staff recommended denial of the Planning Act applications, City of Toronto Council refused the Planning Act applications, and IRE Yonge Developer’s Inc. appealed the applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB);

AND WHEREAS the OMB refused the Planning Act applications on the grounds that the development was inconsistent with the Planning Act, Provincial Policy Statement, City of Toronto Official Plan and TRCA’s programs and policies;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the following procedure be added to TRCA's Planning and Development Procedural Manual:

16

"Where a land owner has made or makes applications under the Planning Act for development upon which the relevant municipality or committee has not yet decided or, in the case of any appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board a final decision has not been made, any application to the Authority under O.Reg 166/06, As Amended, for permission(s) in connection with such development shall be held in abeyance until such time as information has been received from the relevant municipality, committee, or in the case of an appeal, the Ontario Municipal Board, as to its consideration and decision."

BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this staff report is to report on the outcome of an Ontario Municipal Board hearing with respect to the proposed development of 4155 Yonge Street in the City of Toronto, and to provide a recommendation for addressing future TRCA permit applications where planning permissions for a proposed development have not yet been received.

At Executive Committee Meeting #1/12, held on March 2, 2012, TRCA Planning and Development staff reported on Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications made to the City of Toronto in order to re-develop 4155 Yonge Street with a 12 storey residential condominium to be partially constructed into the valley slope. The report is available at www.trca.on.ca/dotAsset/130590.pdf.

On April 16, 2012, the owner applied for a TRCA permit under Ontario Regulation 166/06 for the same development proposal as was subject to the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications at the City. TRCA staff did not support the proposal as it would have a negative impact on the conservation of land, and it had not yet received Official Plan, Zoning or Site Plan approvals from the municipality.

At Executive Committee Meeting #4/12, held on June 1, 2012, the Committee sat as a Hearing Board to consider the application. The staff report recommending refusal of the application is available at www.trca.on.ca/dotAsset/137343.pdf. At the meeting, the Hearing Board adopted Resolution #B62/12 approving the permit.

The owner appealed the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications to the Ontario Municipal Board around the time of the Hearing Board’s approval of the TRCA permit. City of Toronto staff position at the time was unsupportive of the applications for numerous reasons including traditional planning matters such as height and massing, but primarily due to the impacts on the Natural Heritage System which were inconsistent with the Planning Act, Provincial Policy Statement and the City of Toronto Official Plan.

The OMB hearing was held from April 29th to May 6th, 2013. TRCA Planning and Development staff was subpoenaed by the City of Toronto to provide their independent professional evidence against the application. Other evidence was presented in opposition to the proposal by ecologists, a forester and independent professional planners on behalf of the City of Toronto and the Yonge Ridge Homeowners Association. The owner relied heavily on the TRCA Hearing Board’s approval of the permit.

On June 7, 2013, the Ontario Municipal Board issued an Order respecting File No. PL120694 (www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions/pl120694-Jun-07-2013.pdf). The Order states that:

17

“…the proposed development and amendments do not represent good planning and the Board’s approval of these is not in the public interest.” The proposal “…– to remove natural area first and then seek to restore – runs counter to the themes of protection of the natural heritage system in the City’s and TRCA’s policies and is, therefore, flawed and assigned little weight by the Board for the reasons given. Approval of this proposal would result in a net loss of ecosystem services and the permanent removal of natural feature that cannot be recovered. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.”

The hearing officer raised a number of concerns with the applicant’s proposal in reaching his decision, including:

The Natural Heritage Impact Study (NHIS) submitted by the applicant assumed that half of 1.the valley slope/natural feature would be removed and developed, and that this would be compensated for by a combination of clearing the remaining slope and planting native species, as well as ‘green’ initiatives on the new building such as greenroofs and permeable paving. The hearing officer found “…that the NHIS does not address sufficiently how the proposed development is consistent with the relevant provincial, municipal and TRCA policies” (OMB File No. PL120694, pg. 19). These policies include the Provincial Policy Statement, the City of Toronto Official Plan and TRCA’s Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP). “In the Board’s determination, this approach is not consistent with the well-stated premise in the official plan’s environmental policies and various TRCA documents…that natural features must be protected and preserved first before one begins to ‘restore’ and ‘enhance’” (pgs. 21-22). The decision states that “…the Applicants’ approach is to develop first and restore second. This is inconsistent with the purpose of the VSCMP as cited and cannot be used as a means to justify the proposed removal of the natural feature” (pg. 35). Throughout the decision, the hearing officer refers to the Natural Heritage System policy direction from the provincial level down being “offended” by the application (pgs. 23, 26, 28, 29 31, 34 and 36).

TRCA staff consider the issue of “cumulative impacts” when reviewing development 2.applications. Cumulative impacts to the Natural Heritage System occur by the consistent “nibbling away” (pg. 20) of the natural features due to successive development within the System. As such, decisions with respect to preventing the loss of the Natural Heritage System need to be consistent. The hearing officer states that the “…Board also finds persuasive the statement of TRCA staff that the proposed development creates a significant loss of trees within the valley and a significant loss of the valley slope landform which cannot be recreated. This alteration to the valley would create a loss to its overall habitat value and would contribute to the cumulative loss of natural cover in Toronto.” (pg. 36).

The proposed development would have extended well into the valley slope as opposed to 3.providing a minimum 10 metre buffer from the valley slope. The hearing officer recognized that this buffer is consistent with the City’s Official Plan and “…something that the TRCA calls for on a consistent basis to protect the natural heritage system”. The Board determined that the lack of buffer “…would be detrimental to the natural functions of the natural heritage system” (pg. 16).

18

The Board considered the fact that the TRCA Hearing Board granted a TRCA permit for the 4.proposed development. The hearing officer concluded that “…the TRCA Review Board clearly failed to accord sufficient weight to the direction and central premise of the City’s official plan policies that natural heritage features should not be removed…” and that it “…also failed to safeguard and uphold the guiding principles of the TRCA’s own policies to protect the valley and stream corridors from development that can cause permanent loss to natural features” (pg. 24).

CONCLUSION1. Consistent Approach to Environmental Policies

The OMB hearing officer placed great weight on existing provincial, conservation authority and municipal planning policies when rendering his decision. It is important to ensure that this environmental policy is not undermined. To do so will result in cumulative impacts to the ecological health of the watersheds. As such, staff will continue to make recommendations consistent with existing environmental policy when commenting on municipal planning and TRCA permit applications.

2. Permit vs. Planning ReviewsThe issuance of TRCA permits for a development proposal prior to the proposal receiving municipal planning approval is problematic. Doing so does not allow the municipality to engage the public and consider staff recommendations prior to a permit being granted. This approach to development – where the landowner applies for what is, in reality, a construction permit prior to resolving basic planning matters – is a recurring theme in much of TRCA’s jurisdiction, especially in redeveloping areas. Without necessary planning permissions a proposed project will go nowhere and the TRCA permit becomes irrelevant.

TRCA staff tries to streamline the development review process by reviewing both planning and permit applications along the same track, where appropriate. However, TRCA staff suggest that the time and effort spent reviewing permit applications is not well spent when the municipality and / or the OMB have not yet decided on the basic statutory planning matters (such as the development footprint, including natural hazard, natural heritage or land use issues). That is, it is premature and inefficient for TRCA to issue permits when the development limits have not been resolved and it is difficult, professionally, for staff to complete the permit review. To do so is akin to issuing a construction permit for a structure that does not meet zoning, and is inconsistent with applicable law under the Building Act.

19

This is consistent with direction provided by the Province of Ontario which states that the "...'principal of development' is established through the Planning Act approval process, whereas the CA Act permitting process provides for technical implementation of matters pursuant to Section 28 of the CA Act ..." and that Conservation Authorities "...should ensure that concerns they may have regarding the establishment of the 'principal of development' are conveyed to the municipality/planning approval authority...during the Planning Act approvals process and not through the CA Act S.28 permitting process ". In addition, "an established 'principle of development' does not preclude the ability of the CA (or MMAH as per the MOU) to appeal a planning matter to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) (e.g., based on newer technical information relevant to the PPS). It is recognized that there may be historic planning approval decisions that were made in the absence of current technical information which could now preclude development under the CA Act regulations. Where possible, if an issue remains unresolved, the CA should work with the proponent and the municipality to pursue a resolution." (Policies and Procedures for Conservation Authority Plan Review and Permitting Activities, MNR, May 2010, page 13).

To resolve this, staff recommends that a new procedure be adopted stating that:

"Where a landowner has made or makes applications under the Planning Act for development upon which the relevant municipality or committee has not yet decided or, in the case of any appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board a final decision has not been made, any application to the Authority under O.Reg 166/06 for permission(s) in connection with such development shall be held in abeyance until such time as information has been received from the relevant municipality, committee, or in the case of an appeal, the Ontario Municipal Board, as to its consideration and decision."

Notwithstanding, this does not obligate TRCA to provide a permit that cannot be implemented.

Report prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311Emails: [email protected] Information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311Emails: [email protected]: October 31, 2013

20




RE: ACOUSTIC DOPPLER CURRENT PROFILER PROGRAM IN HUMBER BAYTechnical Support Services

____________________________________________________________________________KEY ISSUEAward of a preferred source contract to provide technical support services for an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Program in Humber Bay.

RECOMMENDATION

WHEREAS at Authority Meeting #5/12, Resolution #A94/12 approved Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff to lead an individual environmental assessment (EA) study in collaboration with Toronto Water, Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and Toronto Waterfront Secretariat, which will consider a Humber Bay landform to improve water quality at Sunnyside Beach, to allow for Blue Flag beach certification;

AND WHEREAS the Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) Program in Humber Bay is a key data collection process required for the calibration of the computer surface water simulation program to be used during the Humber Bay Individual Environmental Assessment;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the contract to provide technical support services for the Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Program in Humber Bay be awarded to ASI Global Limited at a total cost not to exceed $76,000.00, plus HST;

THAT staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures through the course of ASI Global Limited's workplan to a maximum of 20% of the contract cost as a contingency allowance, if deemed necessary.

AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized and directed to take all necessary actions to implement the foregoing, including the signing of any documents.

BACKGROUNDAt Authority Meeting #5/12, held on Friday, June 22, 2012, Resolution #A94/12 approved TRCA staff to lead an individual environmental assessment study for the Humber Bay landform in collaboration with Toronto Water, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and Toronto Waterfront Secretariat.

21

RATIONALEIn order to calibrate computer surface water simulation programs that will be used during the Humber Bay Individual EA, the actual water current velocity measured within Humber Bay will be required. Water current velocity is collected by an ADCP unit; which is a meter that measures and records the water current velocity, at a defined depth, over a specific temporal period. TRCA staff recommends that ASI Global Limited (ASI) be retained to provide technical support services for the Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) program. ASI is the most qualified firm to complete the required services. ASI recently completed ADCP programs for the City of Toronto, such as the Ashbridge's Bay Treatment Plant outfall study (2012-2013) and the Don River and Central Waterfront study (2007 to 2008). TRCA staff consulted with several other consulting firms (i.e. XCG Consultants Ltd., W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd., GHD Canada), as well as TRCA staff to gain an understanding of their qualifications and expertise for the required scope of work. The consultation confirmed that ASI was the most qualified and experienced firm to undertake the required scope of work.

As a result, staff recommends awarding the contract on a preferred source basis as per Section 9.3.3 of TRCA's Purchasing Policy as follows:

The required goods and services are to be supplied by a vendor or supplier having specialized knowledge, skills, expertise or experience that cannot be reasonably provided by any other supplier.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE ASI’s proposed project scope of work includes four tasks as follows:

preparation of five ADCP units for deployment;

ASI to configure and install five ADCP units at five specific locations throughout Humber

Bay. Estimate April 2014;ASI to retrieve all five ADCP units from their respective locations within Humber Bay.

Estimate November, 2014; Download water current velocity data from each ADCP unit. Clean and store each of the

ADCP units. For the installation and retrieval of the ADCP units, ASI will use an remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) and/or commercial divers. Operations will be staged from ASI’s survey vessel.

Downloaded data will be provided to the City of Toronto’s surface water modeler for the Humber Bay Individual Environmental Assessment Project.

FINANCIAL DETAILSTotal budgetary costs will have an upset limit of $76,000 (excluding tax), plus a contingency of $15,200 (20%). Funds for the consulting team and TRCA staff (for project management, consultation, approvals and other related activities) will be invoiced and tracked through account number 212-01. The contract will not be executed until funding for this work, from Toronto Water has been confirmed.

Report prepared by: Ethan Griesbach, extension 5364Emails: [email protected] Information contact: Ethan Griesbach, extension 5364Emails: [email protected]: February 13, 2014

22




RE: JULY 8TH, 2013 STORM DAMAGE PHASE 2 DETAILED SLOPE STABILITY AND EROSION RISK ASSESSMENTSContract #RSD14-03 - Area E, Contract #RSD14-03 - Area F, Contract #RSD14-03 – Area G, Contract #RSD14-03 - Area H and Contract #RSD14-03 – Area J

____________________________________________________________________________KEY ISSUEAward of Contract #RSD14-03 - Area E, Contract #RSD14-03 - Area F, Contract #RSD14-03 – Area G, Contract #RSD14-03 - Area H and Contract #RSD14-03 – Area J for completion of detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessments of properties categorized as medium-high to high priority sites within the subject areas following the July 8th, 2013 storm event.

RECOMMENDATION

WHEREAS the significant rainfall event of July 8th, 2013 caused very high flows and resulting erosion damages along a number of river systems, creating new sites where existing development and infrastructure is endangered, particularly within the City of Toronto;

AND WHEREAS the preliminary assessment process recommended detailed geotechnical investigations of 147 additional properties be carried out as part of the July 8th, 2013 storm damage response efforts to confirm the full extent of risk;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT Contract #RSD14-03 - Area E to complete detailed assessments for 35 properties within the Black Creek subwatershed area be awarded to Cole Engineering at a total cost not to exceed $122,400.00 plus a contingency allowance of $20,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST, it being the highest ranked proposal meeting Toronto and Region Conservation Area (TRCA) specifications for Area E;

THAT Contract #RSD14-03 - Area F to complete detailed assessments for eight properties within the East and West Don River subwatershed areas be awarded to Sarafinchin Associates Ltd. at a total cost not to exceed $67,594.80 plus a contingency allowance of $10,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST, it being the highest ranked proposal meeting TRCA specifications for Area F;

THAT Contract #RSD14-03 - Area G to complete detailed assessments for 20 properties within the Humber River watershed be awarded to Sarafinchin Associates Ltd. at a total cost not to exceed $115,622.00 plus a contingency allowance of $20,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST, it being the highest ranked proposal meeting TRCA specifications for Area G;

23

THAT Contract #RSD14-03 - Area H to complete detailed assessments for 12 properties within the Mimico Creek watershed be awarded to Cole Engineering at a total cost not to exceed $50,670.00 plus a contingency allowance of $10,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST, it being the highest ranked proposal meeting TRCA specifications for Area H;

THAT Contract #RSD14-03 - Area J to complete detailed assessments for 15 properties within the Etobicoke Creek watershed be awarded to Terraprobe Inc. at a total cost not to exceed $56,472.50 plus a contingency allowance of $10,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST, it being the highest ranked proposal meeting TRCA specifications for Area J; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such actions as is necessary to implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents.

BACKGROUNDIn the early evening hours of July 8

th

, 2013 a severe thunderstorm rolled through the Toronto area, bringing large amounts of rainfall over the span of a few hours to the west end and downtown areas of the city. This intense downpour of precipitation not only resulted in extensive flooding of major roadways and transit infrastructure, but also caused significant damage to the river and valley systems and park amenities, water infrastructure and private properties found in and bounding these natural areas.

On July 26, 2013 staff brought a report to Authority Meeting #6/13 providing an overview of the information collected to date with recommendations for further action. At that time, 141 properties had been inspected, six of which were initially flagged as critical (three were later downgraded to high priority following third-party reviews), 20 were flagged as high priority, 33 were flagged as medium priority, 66 as low priority and 16 sites with a priority of “none”, the latter being primarily recently completed TRCA erosion control sites where no appreciable damage was observed following the storm event, or where the damage was not related to river flooding or land erosion (e.g., basement flooding). At that time, preliminary damage estimates were in the order of $28 million.

A follow up report was brought to Authority Meeting #11/13, held on January 31, 2014 noting that as of January 20, 2014 staff has inspected 482 sites reportedly damaged during the July 8th storm event. The report also included but was not limited to providing updated preliminary estimates of the damage observed, now in the order of $37 million across all regions; and a request for approval to proceed with a list of projects using 2014-2015 enhanced funding from the City of Toronto and 2014-2015 core erosion management funding from the Region of Peel, subject to all necessary approvals and confirmation of available funding. Approval to proceed with the aforementioned was granted by the Authority under Resolution #A225/13.

Within this list of projects included a second phase of detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessments for an additional 147 properties inspected by TRCA and/or Terraprobe Inc. that ranked as medium-high or high by TRCA upon completion of the preliminary assessment phase. As with the first phase of detailed assessments, which grouped properties by watershed or subwatershed as Area A, B, C or D, the phase 2 properties were grouped accordingly as Area E, F, G, H, I or J. Areas E-J, with the exception Area I are as follows:

24

Area E: Black Creek - City of Toronto

7, 9,11 Eldorado Court

161,163,165,167 Grandravine Drive

25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35 Gravenhurst Avenue

19. 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31 Ridge Point Crescent

37, 39 Topcliff Avenue

14 Appletree Court

12, 14 King George's Drive

18, 20, 22 Ladyshot Crescent

21, 23, 25 Peacham Crescent

178, 180 Strathnairn Avenue

Area F: East and West Don River - City of Toronto

30 Northline Road

9 Alderbrook Drive

525, 527 Donlands Avenue

72 Hillside Drive

323 Riverview Drive

3800 Yonge Street

Area G: Humber River - City of Toronto

108 Hadrian Drive

22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32 Norfield Crescent

5, 7, 9 Windhill Crescent

58 Bexley Crescent

21, 24 Disan Court

100 North Drive

90, 94 Old Mill Road

1025 Scarlett Road

35, 27 Shendale Drive

25

Area H: Mimico Creek - City of Toronto

2 Kevi Lane

194 Rathburn Road

19, 21, 23, 25 Ridgegate Crescent

767 Royal York Road

10 Burnhamthorpe Crescent

4, 6, 8 Earldown Drive

17 Treeline Court

Area I: West Humber River - City of Toronto

5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55,

57, 59, 61 Moon Valley Drive

87, 93, 101 Bankview Circle

22, 24 Bucksburn Road

49 Collingdale Road

32, 38, 40 Esther Lorrie Drive

30 Grovetree Road

21, 23 Hackmore Avenue

4 Hardwood Gate

33, 35 Lakeland Drive

600 Rexdale Boulevard

75 Strathavon Drive

28, 30, 62, 64 Topbank Drive

22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, Watercliffe Road

Area J: Etobicoke Creek - Region of Peel

3487, 3493, 3499, 3505, 3511, 3515, 3523, 3527, 3533 Ponytrail Drive, City of Mississauga

1876, 1880, 1884, 1888, 1892 Steepbank Crescent, City of Mississauga

23 Sunforest Drive, City of Brampton

RATIONALETRCA requires the services of qualified geotechnical engineering firms to complete the detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessments of the above noted properties in Areas E - J in order to determine the full extent of risk and inform the priority ranking for potential stabilization works, subject to all necessary approvals and funding.

26

A Request for Proposal (RFP) was publicly advertised on the procurement website Biddingo.com on January 22, 2014, with expressions of interest subsequently received from seven qualified consulting firms as follows:

Sarafinchin Associates;

Terraprobe Inc.;

Coffey Geotechnics;

Soil Probe;

Cole Engineering / Soil Eng.;

LVM Consulting;

AMEC Environmental.

Five proposals were received by the deadline and opened by TRCA staff (Nick Saccone, Judith Reda and Lori Colussi) on February 6, 2014, and revised pricing received by TRCA staff (Moranne McDonnell, Patricia Newland and Patrick White) on February 18, 2014 with the following final results:

Area Sarafinchin Terraprobe Coffey Geotech.

Soil Probe Cole Eng. & Soil Eng.

Area E $158,459.60 $167,924.90 $342,000.00 No Bid $122,400.00Area F $67,594.80 $85,892.40 $122,500.00 No Bid No BidArea G $115,622.00 $124,094.35 $240,000.00 No Bid No BidArea H $61,484.80 $99,457.90 $161,000.00 No Bid $50,670.00Area J $72,976.80 $56,472.50 $197,500.00 $114,955.00 No BidStart up meeting $1,500.00 $1,530.00 $400.00 No Bid $910.00

To aid in determining the preferred consulting firm to undertake the assignment, proposals were evaluated by TRCA’s Selection Committee based upon the criteria stated in the RFP as follows:

Criteria Sarafinchin Terraprobe Coffey Geotech.

Soil Probe Cole Eng. + Soil Eng

Expertise and Qualifications (30%)

30% 30% 27% 27% 24%

Understanding of work (25%)

25% 25% 23% 13% 20%

Conformance with terms of RFP (10%)

10% 10% 10% 10% 10%

Expertise and availability of key personnel (15%)

15% 15% 15% 15% 15%

Reasonableness of cost (20%)

16% 18% 4% 8% 16%

Total (100%) 96% 98% 79% 73% 85%

27

The Selection Committee determined that Terraprobe Inc. and Sarafinchin Associates Ltd. were the strongest candidates for completing Contract #RSD14-03, based on previous experience with the scope and magnitude of works required. Coffey Geotechnics provided a solid proposal with a clear understanding of the assignment and mechanisms in place to tackle the magnitude of the assignment required however there was a significant variation in price over that of the other consulting firms for a comparable scope of services, the reason for which could not be determined by the Selection Committee. Cole Engineering submitted a very good proposal but has less demonstrated experience than Terraprobe Inc. and Sarafinchin Associates Limited. Soil Probe submitted a good proposal but did not conform with a key requirement of the RFP and the pricing was significantly higher than the most competitive bid for each Area.

Based on the scores, and the need to expedite the results to align with secured and anticipated funding, TRCA staff recommend that Contract #RSD14-03 be awarded to multiple consulting firms with a distribution of work based the best value for services and TRCA's confidence in the consulting firm's ability to complete the work in the timeframe specified in the RFP. Taking the aforementioned into consideration, TRCA staff recommend that Contract #RSD14-03 for Areas E - J, with the exception of Area I be awarded as follows as they are the highest ranked proposals meeting TRCA specifications for each Area:

Contract #RSD14-03 - Area E be awarded to Cole Engineering and Soil Eng. at a total cost

not to exceed $122,400.00 plus a contingency allowance of $20,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST; Contract #RSD14-03 - Area F be awarded to Sarafinchin Associates Ltd. at a total cost not

to exceed $67,594.80 plus a contingency allowance of $10,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST;Contract #RSD14-03 - Area G be awarded to Sarafinchin Associates Ltd. at a total cost not

to exceed $115,622.00 plus a contingency allowance of $20,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST;Contract #RSD14-03 - Area H be awarded to Cole Engineering at a total cost not to exceed

$50,670.00 plus a contingency allowance of $10,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST; Contract #RSD14-03 - Area J be awarded to Terraprobe Inc. at a total cost not to exceed

$56,472.50 plus a contingency allowance of $10,000.00 for the expansion of the proposed works as authorized by staff, plus HST

TRCA staff has recommended that these contingencies be carried in the event that additional properties located adjacent to the ones under investigation are recommended to be included in the detailed study.

FINANCIAL DETAILSFunding for the completion of Areas E, F, G, and H is available from 2014 enhanced funding from the City of Toronto within account 13301. Funding for the completion of Area J is available from 2014 remedial capital works funding from the Region of Peel within account 129-35.

Report prepared by: Patricia Newland, 416-392-9690Emails: [email protected] Information contact: Patricia Newland, 416-392-9690Emails: [email protected]: February 26, 2014

28



FROM: Carolyn Woodland, Director, Planning and Development

RE: APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses

____________________________________________________________________________KEY ISSUEPursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, written permission from the Authority is required for:

a) straightening, changing, diverting or interfering in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream or watercourse, or for changing or interfering in any way with a wetland;

b) development, if in the opinion of the authority, the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches or pollution or the conservation of land may be affected by the development.

A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land is affected.

RECOMMENDATION

THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06 for the applications which are listed below:

PERMIT APPLICATIONS EX10.1 - EX10.6 ARE MAJOR APPLICATIONS

Applications that involved a more complex suite of technical studies to demonstrate consistency with policies; applications that cover a significant geographic area (e.g. subdivisions, stormwater management ponds), extensive modifications to the landscape, major infrastructure projects, emergency works, resolution of violations/after the fact permits, trail construction

CITY OF BRAMPTON

EX10.1 AYR MOTORS EXPRESSTo construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure and site grade on Lot F, Plan 636, (317 Orenda Road), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Ayr Motors Express. The purpose is to undertake works within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed in order to facilitate the demolition of the northern portion of the existing industrial building, construct a new office area, new asphalt for the parking area, interior renovations and replacement of windows.

29

The permit will be issued for the period of March 7, 2014 to March 6, 2016 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:

Site Plan, Drawing No. A1, prepared by D. Kolarov, K & K Architects, dated August

2013, last revised September 16, 2013, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development October 4, 2013;\Floor Plan and Elevations, Drawing No. A2, prepared by D. Kolarov, K & K Architects,

dated August 2013, last revised September 16, 2013, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development October 4, 2013;Overall Floor Plan Office Enlargement, Drawing No. A3, prepared by D. Kolarov, K & K

Architects, dated August 2013, last revised September 16, 2013, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development October 4, 2013;Elevations, Drawing No. A4, prepared by D. Kolarov, K & K Architects, dated August

2013, last revised September 16, 2013, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development October 4, 2013;Site Grading and Servicing Plan, Drawing No. 13156 G-1, prepared by V.A. Piscione,

V.A. Piscione & Associates Incorporated, dated September 3, 2013, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development October 4, 2013;Landscape Plan, Drawing No. L-1, prepared by J. Marten, Juhan Marten Landscape

Architect, dated September 5, 2013, last revised September 15, 2013, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development October 4, 2013.

RATIONALEThe application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

30

Proposal:The purpose of this application is to undertake works within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed in order to facilitate a 2,344.10 square metre demolition to the northern portion of the existing industrial building, the construction of a new 2,344.10 square metre office addition, new asphalt for the parking area, interior renovations and replacement of windows associated with a Site Plan Application (City File No. SP13-052) at 317 Orenda Road, City of Brampton.

The subject property is located in close proximity to Spring Creek of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed and is located within the Regional Floodplain. As such, the subject property will be inundated by flood waters during the Regional Storm event. However, the subject property is located within the Avondale Special Policy Area (SPA), which allows for certain development within the floodplain provided the proposal meets the TRCA and Provincial technical requirements for development within SPAs.

The SPA is not intended to allow for new or intensified development. The subject property is currently designated "Industrial" by the City of Brampton Official Plan and zoned "Industrial" (M2). City staff have confirmed that no amendments to the Official Plan and/or Zoning By-law are required in order to permit the proposed industrial development. The above noted Site Plan Application is currently being reviewed in tandem with this permit application to ensure a mutually supported development application. It is our opinion that the proposed development is consistent with the originally contemplated land uses at the time of the SPA approval and is not intensified development. As well, TRCA technical staff have confirmed that the proposed works meet the technical floodproofing requirements.

Control of Flooding:The proposed works are located within the Regional Floodplain. However, the proposed works are located outside of the hydraulic floodway. The proposed development is adequately floodproofed and has been designed to withstand the velocities associated with the Regional Storm event. Based on a hydraulic analysis completed by the applicant's consulting engineer, the proposed development will not adversely impact flooding upstream and/or downstream. As such, no impacts to the storage and/or conveyance of flood waters is anticipated.

Pollution:Appropriate erosion and sediment controls will be installed and maintained throughout all phases of construction.

Dynamic Beaches:Not applicable.

Erosion:There are no geotechnical and/or slope stability concerns associated with this proposal.

Conservation of Land:No significant vegetation will be removed as a result of construction.

PlantingsAs no significant vegetation will be removed, plantings are noted required as a component of this application.

31

Policy Guidelines:The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP).

CFN: 50387 - Application #: 0002/14/BRAMReport Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244For information contact: Adam Miller, extension 5244Date: February 24, 2014


EX10.2 82 TREELAWN PARKWAYTo construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, change a building or structure so that it alters its use or potential use, increases its size or increases the number of dwelling units and site grade on Lot 194, Plan 3309, (82 Treelawn Parkway), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed. The purpose is to construct a new two-storey single family detached dwelling and inground pool, fountain and associated landscaping.


Drawing unnumbered, Grading and Drainage Plan, prepared by Paul Corsetti, dated

November 26, 2013, received on February 14, 2014;Drawing unnumbered, Sediment Control Plan, prepared by Paul Corsetti, dated

November 26, 2013, received on February 14, 2014;Drawing unnumbered, Site Grading Plan, prepared by Aksan Piller Corporation Ltd.

O.L.S., dated February 4, 2014, received on February 14, 2014.

32


Proposal:The purpose of this application is to develop within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a new one-storey single family detached dwelling, in-ground pool, fountain and associated landscaping in the rear yard at 82 Treelawn Parkway. The existing dwelling is to be demolished. The subject site is located west of Caledonia Road, north of Lawrence Avenue West in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area).

Background:The current application subject to this report is for a new dwelling, pool, fountain and landscaping located above the top of bank of the valley. Technically, TRCA staff has no objection to the proposal as it is adequately set back from the valley slope and meets the tests of Ontario Regulation 166/06.

This particular property is associated with TRCA Violation #V2650 issued July 2012, as well as a number of municipal by-law infractions. The municipal infractions have been on-going since 2004, prior to when TRCA regulated this property. The TRCA violation is associated with the construction of an existing sports court, retaining walls, associated landscaping and filling. These structures and filling took place within the valley below the top of bank. TRCA Planning and Development staff cannot support these structures and filling as they do not meet TRCA policies and therefore do not meet the tests of Ontario Regulation 166/06. TRCA Enforcement staff has requested that these structures and fill be removed and the site stabilized.

On November 13, 2013, Toronto City Council adopted the following: "City Council request that the TRCA take no action with respect to any intrusions into the ravine, provided that the owner of 82 Treelawn Parkway applies for and obtains a permit from TRCA for the pool and landscaping that includes certification from an engineer that the existing and any new structures including the house are stable for the long-term". The decision was in response to a request from the local City Councillor (see Attachment 1). Under standard practice, TRCA staff do not recommend the approval of permits prior to the resolution of any outstanding violations of Ontario Regulation 166/06.

Conditional Approval:The approval of this permit is conditional upon the outstanding TRCA Violation #V2650 remaining on the property as an encumbrance.

The issuance of this permit is conditional upon the appropriate tree planting being secured by the City of Toronto Ravine and Natural Feature Protection staff.

Control of Flooding:The subject site is not located within a regional storm flood plain and the proposal will have no impact on the storage and/or conveyance of floodwaters.

Pollution:Appropriate erosion and sediment controls will be installed and maintained throughout all phases of construction.

33


Erosion:TRCA engineering staff are satisfied that there are no slope stability/geo-technical concerns associated with the proposed new dwelling and in-ground pool. The owner has provided a letter stamped and signed by a Professional Engineer stating that the existing retaining walls which are not part of this permit are stable for the long term.

Conservation of Land:The proposed new dwelling and in-ground pool are adequately set back from the top of bank.

PlantingsNative plantings will be provided as per City of Toronto Urban Forestry Ravine Protection Services Guidelines and recommendations pertaining to tree protection and maintenance during construction. Additional plantings will be provided on site to address municipal by-law infractions.

Policy Guidelines:This proposed new dwelling, in-ground pool and landscaping are consistent with Section 4.2.2.(D) and (E), Development Guidelines for Replacement Structures, Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures within Non-Established/Highly Urbanized Areas, of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 50453 - Application #: 0030/14/TORReport Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311Date: February 24, 2014


EX10.3 68 BLYTH HILL ROADTo construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot 12, Plan 3833 YORK, (68 Blyth Hill Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed. The purpose is to acknowledge the construction of a replacement concrete patio and reinforcement of the existing retaining wall in the rear yard at 68 Blyth Hill Road in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). The previous patio and the existing retaining wall were damaged in the July 8th, 2013 storm.

34

The permit will be issued for the period of March 7, 2014 to September 6, 2014 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:

Drawing No. A1.01, New Deck Layout, prepared by Haddad Geotechnical Inc., dated

August 14, 2013, received by TRCA staff on January 31, 2014;Drawing No. A1.02, New Deck Section, prepared by Haddad Geotechnical Inc., dated

August 14, 2013, received by TRCA staff on January 31, 2014;Drawing No. A1.03, New Deck Section, prepared by Haddad Geotechnical Inc., dated

August 14, 2013, received by TRCA staff on January 31, 2014;Drawing No. A1.04, Preliminary Guard Detail, prepared by Haddad Geotechnical Inc.,

dated August 14, 2013, received by TRCA staff on January 31, 2014;Drawing No. A1.05, Stair Section & Elevation, prepared by Haddad Geotechnical Inc.,

dated August 14, 2013, received by TRCA staff on January 31, 2014;Drawing No. A1.06, Glass Guard Elevations, prepared by Haddad Geotechnical Inc.,



dated August 14, 2013, received by TRCA staff on January 31, 2014.


Proposal:The purpose of this application is to acknowledge the construction of a replacement concrete patio and reinforcement of the existing retaining walls in the rear yard at 68 Blyth Hill Road in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). The subject site is located within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Don River watershed, west of Bayview Avenue, and north of Eglinton Avenue East.

35

The previous patio and existing retaining walls were constructed in the valley prior to TRCA's regulatory authority. The previous structure was not structurally sound and failed due to inadequate drainage and foundations during the July 8th, 2013 storm. The replacement structure was constructed upon a helical pier system. The purpose of the implemented helical pier system was to support the new replacement patio as well as reinforce the existing fill and retaining walls. In addition, the new patio design incorporates stormwater management measures to re-direct discharge from existing rainwater leaders to the base of the slope by means of a solid-walled pipe.

Fee and Permit Timing:The applicant completed works in advance of a permit under Ontario Regulation 166/06 being issued, therefore the permit is to be issued "after the fact". The applicant has paid the application fee plus 100% in association with the violation. In addition, the time frame for this permit will be adjusted to reflect that the works have already been completed.

Control of Flooding:The constructed works are located outside of the Regulatory Floodplain. As such, there are no anticipated impacts to the storage and/or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution:The structure has already been built. Erosion control measures were likely maintained during construction as there is no apparent sedimentation of the watercourse.


Erosion:A geotechnical investigation and design recommendations report has been reviewed and approved by TRCA geotechnical engineering staff and the works have been constructed in accordance with the recommendations of this report.

Conservation of Land:The replacement patio has maintained the same footprint in principle as the previous structure and is consistent with existing development along this reach of the valley corridor.

PlantingsNative plantings will be provided as per City of Toronto Urban Forestry Ravine Protection Services Guidelines.

Policy Guidelines:This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.(D) - Development Guidelines for Replacement Structures within Non-Established/Highly Urbanized Areas of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 50540 - Application #: 0072/14/TORReport Prepared by: Nicole Moxley, extension 5284For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311Date: February 21, 2014

36


EX10.4 CITY OF TORONTOTo construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade, and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere, at Chorley Park between Summerhill Avenue and Roxborough Drive, east of Douglas Drive, in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to construct a switchback trail connection. Works will involve construction of a new switchback trail connection and restoration of the existing trails to a natural state. No in-water works are within the scope of this project.


Letter from City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation (Wendy Strickland)

committing to planting native trees and shrubs on the Chorley Park slope at a minimum 3:1 ratio to compensate for removals; dated February 12, 2014; received by TRCA on February 14, 2014;Drawing unnumbered; Cover Sheet: Chorley Park Switchback Trail; prepared by R.V.

Anderson Associates Ltd. and TRCA on behalf of City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation; dated n.d.; received by TRCA on February 14, 2014;Drawing no. P-1; Chorley Park Switchback Trail: Grading and Layout; prepared by

R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd. and TRCA on behalf of City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation; dated June 20, 2013; revised February 14, 2014; received by TRCA on February 14, 2014;Drawing no. D-1; Chorley Park Switchback Trail: General Notes and Details; prepared

by R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd. and TRCA on behalf of City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation; dated June 20, 2013; revised February 14, 2014; received by TRCA on February 14, 2014;

37

Drawing no. T-1; Chorley Park Switchback Trail: Existing Tree Inventory Data;

prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd. and TRCA on behalf of City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation; dated June 20, 2013; revised February 14, 2014; received by TRCA on February 14, 2014;Drawing no. ESC-1; Chorley Park Switchback Trail: Tree Clearing and Construction

Mobilization; prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd. and TRCA on behalf of City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation; dated June 20, 2013; revised February 14, 2014; received by TRCA on February 14, 2014;Drawing no. ESC-2; Chorley Park Switchback Trail: Retaining Wall and Trail

Construction; prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd. and TRCA on behalf of City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation; dated June 20, 2013; revised February 14, 2014; received by TRCA on February 14, 2014;Drawing no. ESC-3; Chorley Park Switchback Trail: Final Restoration and

Maintenance; prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd. and TRCA on behalf of City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation; dated June 20, 2013; revised February 14, 2014; received by TRCA on February 14, 2014;Drawing no. S-1; Chorley Park Switchback Trail: Steel Staircase General Arrangement

Plan and Details; prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd. and TRCA on behalf of City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation; dated June 20, 2013; revised February 14, 2014; received by TRCA on February 14, 2014.


Proposal:The City of Toronto is proposing to construct a switchback trail in Chorley Park at 245 Douglas Drive, between Summerhill Avenue and Roxborough Drive. Works will involve construction of a new 3m asphalt trail surface in a repeating ‘Z’ pattern, connecting the existing Beltline Trail to Douglas Drive. The new trail connection is to be flanked with armour stone and wood fencing. New drainage pipes and rip rap swale treatments will be located at various switchback points. A staircase that is part of the existing trail system will be removed and replaced with a new steel staircase at the end of the southernmost switchback. Access to the site is to be obtained from Douglas Drive, while a staging area is to be established adjacent to the site entrance. Heavy duty silt fencing will be established to isolate the work areas, access route and staging area, while sediment socks will be employed in the swales on the site to contain sediment laden runoff. Mud mats will also be employed at the site entrance. Tree protection hoarding will be constructed in accordance with City of Toronto Urban Forestry standards. There are 138 tree removals associated with this project, mostly consisting of non-native, invasive species. These removals will be compensated by executing an extensive landscape planting plan of native trees and shrubs, developed in consultation with City of Toronto Urban Forestry staff. The existing system of asphalt trails, which connects the Beltline Trail to Roxborough Drive and Douglas Drive, will be removed and restored to a natural state using topsoil and a seed mix. Construction is anticipated to begin in spring 2014.

Control of Flooding:The proposed works are not anticipated to impact flooding, flood storage or conveyance of flood waters. All grades will be maintained or matched.

38

Pollution:Erosion and sediment control measures (silt fence, sediment socks, mud mats) will be installed prior to construction and maintained for its duration. These measures are being implemented to prevent the release of construction generated sediment into Mud Creek, a tributary of the Lower Don River. Erosion and sediment control measures have been provided in accordance with the TRCA Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Urban Construction (2006).

Dynamic Beaches:The proposal will not have any implications to dynamic beaches.

Erosion:There are no impacts identified to slope stability or erosion as a result of these works.

Conservation of Land:No in-water works are within the scope of this project.

PlantingsThere are 138 tree removals associated with this project, mostly consisting of non-native, invasive species. All disturbed areas will be restored by executing an extensive landscape planting plan developed in consultation with City of Toronto Urban Forestry, ensuring the site returns to pre-construction conditions, or better, upon completion of work.

Policy Guidelines:This proposal complies with Section 4.1.2, New Resource-based Uses, of the TRCA’s Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 50410 - Application #: 0040/14/TORReport Prepared by: Daniel Brent, extension 5774For information contact: Daniel Brent, extension 5774Date: February 25, 2014

CITY OF VAUGHAN

EX10.5 1678575 ONTARIO INC. O/A AMICORP DEVELOPMENTS INC.To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot PARCEL G & H, Plan RP 449, (86 Woodbridge Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1678575 Ontario Inc. o/a Amicorp Developments Inc. The purpose is to conduct site grading on the subject lands, in order to develop a 6-storey residential condominium building with 125 units.

39


Site Plan, Drawing No. A100, prepared by SRN Architects Inc., dated July 31, 2013,

received by TRCA on August 6, 2013;Erosion Control Plan, Drawing No. EC-01, prepared by Cole Engineering, Revision No.

6 (revise dated November 4, 2013), received by TRCA on November 22, 2013;Detail Drawings -1, Drawing No. DD-01, prepared by Cole Engineering, Revision No. 6

(revise dated November 4, 2013), received by TRCA on November 22, 2013;Detail Drawings-2, Drawing No. DD-02, prepared by Cole Engineering, Revision No. 6

(revise dated November 4, 2013), received by TRCA on November 22, 2013;Site Grading and Servicing Plan, Drawing No. SW-01, prepared by Cole Engineering,

Revision No. 6 (revise dated November 4, 2013), received by TRCA on November 22, 2013;Landscape Planting Plan, Drawing No. L-2, prepared by Landscape Planning Limited,

Revision No. 7 (revise dated July 29, 2013), received by TRCA on August 6, 2013;Stormwater Management Report - Woodbridge Avenue and Clarence Avenue, City of

Vaughan, prepared by Cole Engineering, dated November 2013;Emergency Preparedness Manual - 86 Woodbridge Avenue, City of Vaughan,

prepared by Trow, received by TRCA on July 18, 2013;Health and Safety Assessment - 86 Woodbridge Avenue, City of Vaughan, prepared

by Weston Consulting, dated July 11, 2013.


40

Proposal:The proposal is to conduct site grading works, in order to facilitate the development of a 6-storey condominium building, with 125 residential units. The subject site is located on the northwest corner of Woodbridge Avenue and Clarence Street (west of Islington Avenue). The site is approximately 0.67 ha (1.66 ac) in size and is located entirely within the Regional Storm Flood Plain associated with the Humber River and within the Regulated Area of Ontario Regulation 166/06. The property is also located within the Woodbridge Special Policy Area (SPA). This area of downtown Woodbridge has been designated as an SPA by the Province of Ontario, which allows for some development and redevelopment to occur within floodprone areas, subject to satisfying a number of technical requirements. This includes floodproofing requirements and the provision of safe access to and from the site.

The subject parcel is currently designated 'Mixed Use Commercial' by OPA #240 (Woodbridge Community Plan), as amended by OPA #440 (Woodbridge Core Plan). The proposed development conforms to the "Mixed Use Commercial' policies of OPA #240, as amended. The lands are also designated 'Low-Rise Mixed Use' (north portion) and 'Mid-Rise Mixed-Use' (south portion) by the City of Vaughan Official Plan 2010 (Volume 2- Woodbridge Centre Secondary Plan), which was adopted by Vaughan Council on September 7, 2010 and is before the Ontario Municipal Board. The proposed development is being developed in accordance with the policies of OPA #240, and as amended by OPA #440, which are currently in effect.

The Regional Storm Flood Plain elevation on the subject site is 145.87 m. Applying a 0.3 m freeboard (buffer) from this elevation, all openings including doors/windows, and mechanical/electrical systems for the proposed building will be built above the Regional Storm Flood Plain elevation (with freeboard, 146.17 m). Additionally, the entrance to the underground parking structure will also be located above this elevation to ensure that flood waters do not enter the underground area. The applicant has also submitted an Emergency Preparedness Manual which is a management plan to be implemented by the condominium corporation during a flood event. This includes a communications/notification plan along with detailed operational procedures to be executed during an emergency event. This will allow for the safe and orderly evacuation of residents at the time of a flood event. The Emergency Preparedness Manual will also form part of the articles of incorporation for the subject condominium corporation.

Control of Flooding:TRCA Water Management Engineering staff has reviewed technical plans for the subject proposal including grading plans and are satisfied that the works will not exacerbate or negatively impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters beyond levels which have been anticipated for this location. Additionally, staff have reviewed the supporting technical analysis, and are satisfied that the building will be constructed to meet TRCA's floodproofing criteria. All openings are to be above the Regional Storm Elevation of 145.87 m plus 0.3 freeboard (146.17 m).

Pollution:Erosion and sediment control measures including silt fencing will be implemented prior to the initiation of construction, to ensure sediment is not transported to the adjacent Humber River and its associated valley corridor.

Dynamic Beaches:Not applicable

41

Erosion:Erosion will minimized through the implementation of the aforementioned erosion and sediment control measures.

Conservation of Land:The proposed development is located more than 10 metres away from the top of bank associated with the Humber River. There are no geotechnical/slope stability issues relating to the proposal. Furthermore, there are no fisheries issues associated with these works nor will significant vegetation be removed.

PlantingsA landscape plan has been submitted for landscape elements around the proposed building. TRCA staff are satisfied with this plan.

Policy Guidelines:This proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification within Established Communities/Highly Urbanized Communities - of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP).

CFN: 49704 - Application #: 0736/13/VAUGReport Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307For information contact: Kevin Huang, extension 5307Date: February 25, 2014

CITY OF AJAX

EX10.6 DELCO HOMES INCTo construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Part Lot 15, Concession 1, (Kingston Road and Randall Drive), in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Delco Homes Inc. The purpose is to excavate, grade and construct twenty-nine row townhouses and associated rear patios and decks.

42


Letter signed by Anthony Egi, Delco Homes Inc. and Vic Wood, V. A. Wood &

Associates, confirming that V. A. Wood & Associates has been hired to monitor and ensure that the foundations are constructed as per the methodology identified in the permit drawings;Drawing No. A.01, Site Plan, prepared by Suu-dda Patkar Architectural Corporation,

Revision No. 19, revised September 17, 2007, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. A.02a, Front Elevations, prepared by Suu-dda Patkar Architectural

Corporation, Revision No. 10, revised December 22, 2006, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. A.02b, Rear and Side Elevations, prepared by Suu-dda Patkar

Architectural Corporation, Revision No. 11, revised September 27, 2007, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. A.03, Floor Plans, prepared by Suu-dda Patkar Architectural Corporation,

Revision No. 10, revised December 22, 2006, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. VA-1, Existing Vegetation Analysis Plan, prepared by Alexander

Budrevics & Associates Limited, Revision No. 16, revised May 13, 2013, reviewed by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. L-1, Landscape Plan, prepared by Alexander Budrevics & Associates

Limited, Revision No. 16, revised May 13, 2013, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. L-1A, Planting Plan - Ravine Stewardship, prepared by Alexander

Budrevics & Associates Limited, Revision No. 16, revised May 13, 2013, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. L-2, Landscape Details, prepared by Alexander Budrevics & Associates

Limited, Revision No. 16, revised May 13, 2013, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. L-3, Landscape Details, prepared by Alexander Budrevics & Associates

Limited, Revision No. 16, revised May 13, 2013, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. RS-1, Ravine Stewardship Plan, prepared by Aboud & Associates Inc.,

Revision No. 1, revised December 3, 2007, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. SP-1, Site Servicing Plan, prepared by D. G. Biddle & Associates Limited,

Revision No. 15, revised November 2013, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. SP-2, Site Grading Plan, prepared by D. G. Biddle & Associates Limited,

Revision No. 15, revised November 2013, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. ES-1, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, prepared by D. G. Biddle &

Associates Limited, Revision No. 14, revised November 2013, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. UT-1, Utility Coordination Plan, prepared by D. G. Biddle & Associates

Limited, Revision No. 12, revised September 2007, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;

43

Drawing No. C-1, Travis Lane and Valley Wall Sections, prepared by D. G. Biddle &

Associates Limited, Revision No. 12, revised September 2007, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. S101, Cross Section at J-J, prepared by AMR Engineering Limited,

stamped by M. Gursahani, P. Eng. dated August 30, 2007, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. S102, Retaining Wall Detail 1, prepared by AMR Engineering Limited,

stamped by M. Gursahani, P. Eng. dated August 30, 2007, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. S103, Cross Section at K-K, prepared by AMR Engineering Limited,


stamped by M. Gursahani, P. Eng. dated August 30, 2007, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014;Drawing No. S105, Cross Section at L-L, prepared by AMR Engineering Limited,


stamped by M. Gursahani, P. Eng. dated August 30, 2007, approved by Town of Ajax on January 30, 2014, received January 30, 2014.


Proposal:The proposal is to excavate, grade and construct twenty-nine row townhouses and associated patios and rear decks. The property is located south of Kingston Road and west of Randall Drive in the Pickering Village district of the Town of Ajax. Previous versions of the proposal received planning approval from the Town of Ajax and permit approval from the TRCA in 1990. Those approvals were revised and renewed a number of times up to 2005; however, the previous proposal was never built. The original TRCA permit expired in 2006, after the adoption of O. Reg. 166/06 when new limitations on the re-issuance of permits were introduced. The owner then applied for a new TRCA permit in 2006, at which time staff raised significant concerns with the proposal relative to the potential impacts to the valley slope and the tests of the regulation. At the same time the owner applied to the Town of Ajax for a revision to his original Site Plan approval. Over the past seven years, TRCA staff has been working with the owner and the Town of Ajax staff to resolve the technical issues related to the identification of the long term stable top of bank (using up to date criteria), setbacks from the top of bank, foundation construction methodology, and conveyance and re-naturalization of the valley slope. The site is a narrow strip of land located between the existing St. George's Anglican Church and the Duffins Creek valley and as a result faced a number of technical and planning challenges to its development within a constrained footprint. These technical challenges have now been resolved.

44

Conditional Permit:The issuance of this permit is conditional upon the owner ensuring that the construction of the development is supervised by a licensed professional geotechnical engineer to ensure that the construction is implemented per the engineering drawings and will have no impact on the adjacent slope.

Control of Flooding:The site is not located within a regional storm floodplain.

Pollution:Temporary sediment control has been provided per the Greater Golden Horseshoe Area Conservation Authorities, Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Urban Construction.


Erosion:The proposed townhouses will generally be developed 10 metres or greater from the top of the bank of the Duffins Creek valley, with the exception of twelve townhouses which are located in places between 2 and 6 metres from the top of bank. Staff have worked within the constraints of the site and the principle of development established by past municipal and TRCA approvals, while ensuring that the slope is protected for the long term. As such, these townhouses will be constructed without rear yard amenities and by using a slot trench methodology to ensure that the excavation for the foundations will not encroach into the slope. In addition, foundations for all of the townhouses will be founded below a 3 to 1 slope line and/or down to native soils. The construction on the tableland will be isolated from the valley slope by a double row of enviro-fence and will be supervised by a licensed professional geotechnical engineer.

Conservation of Land:The proposal is located on tableland that was cleared many years ago. The townhouses will be developed further from the top of bank than in the previously approved proposal. A Ravine Stewardship Plan to include invasive removal and new native plantings will be implemented on the valley slope, and has been secured by the municipality. The valley slope down to the bottom of the bank and a portion of Duffins Creek will be conveyed to the TRCA shortly.

PlantingsSignificant native tree, shrub and seed mix plantings will be installed on the valley slope.

Policy Guidelines:While the setback from the top of bank for some of the proposed townhouses is less than 10 metres, the proposal is generally consistent with the intent of Section 4.1., New Development, of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, the objectives of which is to avoid negative impacts due to natural hazards and to protect natural systems. This should be achieved as long as the construction is implemented per the permit drawings.

CFN: 38044 - Application #: 427/06/AJAXReport Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311Date: February 11, 2014

45

EX10.7 ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDEDStandard Delegated Permits, Permission for Routine Infrastructure Works and Minor Works Letter of Approval

RECOMMENDATION

THAT standard delegated permits, permission for routine infrastructure works, and minor works letter of approval granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff, in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, which are listed below, be received.

STANDARD DELEGATED PERMITS

Standard Permits are implemented by Planning and Development Division staff and are received monthly by the Executive Committee. Standard permits are subject to the authorization of designated staff appointed as Enforcement Officers, as per Authority Res.#A199/13. Standard permits are non-complex permissions consistent with TRCA approved policies and procedures and issued for a time period of two years or less.

CITY OF MARKHAM

2332435 ONTARIO LTD. - Rouge River WatershedThe purpose is to recognize the recent resurfacing of an existing driveway and parking area associated with an existing dwelling within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed.

CFN: 50444 - Application #: 0044/14/MARKReport Prepared by: Jeffrey Thompson, extension 5386For information contact: Doris Cheng, extension 5306Date: February 1, 2014

29 THORNLEA ROAD - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a replacement two-storey single family dwelling associated with a municipal building permit.


7 ECKARDT AVENUE - Rouge River WatershedThe purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a two-storey addition and two (2) one-storey additions totaling 2,100 square feet to an existing heritage building.

46


CITY OF PICKERING

379 WOODGRANGE AVENUE - Rouge River WatershedThe purpose is to construct a three-storey single family detached dwelling with a patio and minor retaining walls to the side and rear at 379 Woodgrange Avenue in the City of Pickering. This proposal also includes the removal of the existing concrete retaining wall to reconstruct a natural slope along the south side of the rear yard.

CFN: 49711 - Application #: 0751/13/PICKReport Prepared by: Vanessa Aubrey, extension 5662For information contact: Chris Jones, extension 5718Date: February 25, 2014

CITY OF TORONTO [ETOBOCOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]

19 LELAND AVENUE - Mimico Creek WatershedThe purpose is to construct a second storey addition to the existing dwelling at 19 Leland Avenue.

CFN: 50106 - Application #: 0972/13/TORReport Prepared by: Tara Jahanarai, extension 5284For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259Date: February 21, 2014


ALIT DON VALLEY PROPERTY INC. - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to construct residential stacked townhouses over underground garage at south part of the property at 35-53 Valley Woods Road. The existing townhouses will be demolished.

CFN: 50393 - Application #: 0026/14/TORReport Prepared by: Tara Jahanarai, extension 5284For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311Date: January 21, 2014

27 DENVER CRESCENT - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to construct a replacement deck to the rear of the existing dwelling at 27 Denver Crescent. The footprint of the deck is to remain unchanged.

47


OAKDALE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB LTD. - Humber River WatershedThe purpose is to repair bank erosion and replace two (2) existing pedestrian bridges associated with damage incurred during the July 8, 2013 storm at Oakdale Golf & Country Club (2388 Jane Street) in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area).

CFN: 50225 - Application #: 1036/13/TORReport Prepared by: Nicole Moxley, extension 5284For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259Date: February 25, 2013

CITY OF TORONTO [SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]

205 ROUGE HILLS DRIVE - Rouge River WatershedThe purpose is to construct a replacement in-ground swimming pool with concrete decking and new wood deck behind the existing dwelling at 205 Rouge Hills Drive in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area).

CFN: 49816 - Application #: 0814/13/TORReport Prepared by: Jessica Bester, extension 5250For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311Date: February 4, 2014

MONARCH CORPORATION - Highland Creek WatershedThe purpose is to excavate and remove approximately 600 cubic metres impacted soil. The excavated areas will be back filled with clean fill.

CFN: 50491 - Application #: 0058/14/TORReport Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259Date: February 5, 2014


CITY OF TORONTO - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to replace an existing concrete culvert. Works will involve demolition and replacement of the existing culvert and headwalls. The Ministry of Natural Resources warm water fisheries timing window will apply to this proposal, unless otherwise specified in writing by MNR.

48


CITY OF TORONTO - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to improve capacity and water quality of the combined sewer outflow (CSO) facility at an existing wastewater treatment plant. Works will involve removal and replacement of various facility elements. No in-water works are within the scope of this project.


ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to construct a one-storey addition (256.96 m2) and interior renovation to the existing warehouse building for the purpose of storage and office space at 405 Eastern Avenue in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area).

CFN: 50494 - Application #: 0063/14/TORReport Prepared by: Nicole Moxley, extension 5284For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311Date: February 25, 2014

14 MINTO STREET - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to construct a new three-storey single family detached dwelling and rear deck at 14 Minto Street in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York).

CFN: 49639 - Application #: 0708/13/TORReport Prepared by: Vanessa Aubrey, extension 5662For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311Date: February 21, 2014

12 MINTO STREET - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to construct a new three-storey single family detached dwelling and rear deck at 12 Minto Street in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York).

CFN: 49638 - Application #: 0707/13/TORReport Prepared by: Vanessa Aubrey, extension 5662For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311Date: February 21, 2014

49

CITY OF VAUGHAN

197 CENTRE STREET - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to construct a replacement single family dwelling within a Regulated Area of the Don River Watershed at 197 Centre Street in the City of Vaughan.

CFN: 50440 - Application #: 0025/14/VAUGReport Prepared by: Jonathan Pounder, extension 5304For information contact: Jonathan Pounder, extension 5304Date: February 13, 2014

TOWN OF CALEDON

13221 CENTREVILLE CREEK ROAD - Humber River WatershedThe purpose is to undertake works within the TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 48 feet x 68 feet (14.6 metre x 20.72 metre) barn at the rear of an existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit .

CFN: 50230 - Application #: 1053/13/CALReport Prepared by: Anant Patel, extension 5618For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324Date: February 4, 2014

TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL

114 WOOD LANE - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a two-storey dwelling with detached garage and paved driveway associated with a municipal building permit.

CFN: 50531 - Application #: 0075/14/RHReport Prepared by: Jeffrey Thompson, extension 5386For information contact: Doris Cheng, extension 5306Date: February 12, 2014

DENHAM BUILDING GROUP INC. - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a two-storey single family dwelling associated with a municipal building permit.


50

DENHAM BUILDING GROUP INC. - Don River WatershedThe purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a two-storey single family dwelling associated with a municipal building permit.


TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE

35 BURKHOLDER STREET - Duffins Creek WatershedThe purpose is to construct a new two-storey single family detached dwelling on the vacant residential lot at 35 Burkholder Street in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville.

CFN: 49923 - Application #: 0903/13/WSReport Prepared by: Vanessa Aubrey, extension 5662For information contact: Chris Jones, extension 5718Date: February 25, 2014

TOWNSHIP OF KING

312 BURNS BOULEVARD - Humber River WatershedThe purpose is to conduct landscaping works around a man-made pond within a Regulated Area of the Humber River watershed at 312 Burns Boulevard in the Township of King.

CFN: 50054 - Application #: 0947/13/KINGReport Prepared by: Anthony Sun, extension 5724For information contact: June Little, extension 5756Date: February 24, 2014

PERMISSION FOR ROUTINE INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS

Permission for Routine Infrastructure Works Letter of Approval are implemented by Planning and Development Division staff and are received monthly by the Executive Committee. The permission of routine infrastructure works is subject to authorization by the Director, Planning and Development and signed by an appointed enforcement officer. All routine infrastructure works are located within a Regulated Area, generally within or adjacent to the hazard or natural feature and in the opinion of staff do not affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land.

51


CITY OF TORONTOTo undertake road/pathway resurfacing or reconstruction on Arnold Avenue, from Lambton Avenue to end of Arnold Avenue, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed, as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to reconstruct Arnold Avenue, from Lambton Avenue to end of Arnold Avenue. Works involve resurfacing the roadway and replacing the sidewalks. No in-water works are involved in this project.

CFN: 50420 - Application #: 0017/14/TORReport Prepared by: Shirin Varzgani, extension 5785For information contact: Shirin Varzgani, extension 5785Date: February 4, 2014


TORONTO HYDROTo undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway, on Donwoods Drive from Yonge Street to Ivor Road; Yonge Street from Donwoods Drive to Ivor Road; and Ivor Road from Yonge Street to Donwoods Drive, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to replace buried utility cables. Works will involve installation of cable infrastructure in the roadway and boulevard. No in-water works are within the scope of this project.



BELL CANADATo undertake sewer and watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on Progress Avenue, east of Markham Road, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed, as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to install a communication conduit across Progress Avenue and a new equipment cabinet (ALP 148) on the south side of Progress Avenue. No in-water works are within the scope of this project.


52

CITY OF TORONTOTo undertake road/pathway resurfacing or reconstruction, undertake sewer and watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on Lawrence Avenue East, from Markham Road to Kingston Road, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed, as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to resurface an existing roadway. In addition, the proposed construction works also involve relining an existing watermain on Lawrence Avenue East, from Orton Park Road to Kingston Road. No in-water works are within the scope of this project.



CITY OF TORONTOTo undertake sewer and watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on Royal Drive, from Danforth Avenue to Don Valley Parkway, in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by the City of Toronto through a Park Access Agreement. The purpose is to undertake maintenance on an existing 300 mm diameter watermain on Royal Drive, from Danforth Avenue to Don Valley Parkway. Works will involve relining the watermain from five locations. No in-water works are involved in this project.


CITY OF VAUGHAN

POWERSTREAM INC.To undertake utility pole installation on Highway 7 from west of Keele Street to west of the GO Bradford bridge, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to relocate existing hydro pole lines and associated guying on Highway 7 from west of Keele Street to west of the GO Bradford bridge. The proposed relocations are to facilitate the VIVAnext Highway 7 widening project.

CFN: 50113 - Application #: 0979/13/VAUGReport Prepared by: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629For information contact: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629Date: February 10, 2014

53

TOWN OF CALEDON

BELL CANADATo undertake sewer and watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on Highway 50 north of Columbia Way in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by the Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to relocate the existing underground Bell Canada line on Highway 50, just north of Columbia Way, to accommodate future road works in the Town of Caledon. The warm water fisheries timing window will be applied to this project, unless otherwise specified in writing by the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR).

CFN: 50510 - Application #: 0090/14/CALReport Prepared by: Caroline Mugo, extension 5689For information contact: Caroline Mugo, extension 5689Date: February 24, 2014

MINOR WORKS LETTER OF APPROVAL

Permission for Minor Works Letter of Approval are implemented by Planning and Development Division staff and are received monthly by the Executive Committee. The permission of minor works is subject to authorization by the Director, Planning and Development and signed by an appointed enforcement officer. All minor works are located within a Regulated Area, outside of the floodplain and in the opinion of staff do not affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land.

CITY OF PICKERING

5321 OLD BROCK ROADTo construct a non-habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) and change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 14, Plan 94, Part Lot 15, 21, 22, 23, Plan 94, (5321 Old Brock Road), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed.

CFN: 50232 - Application #: 1038/13/PICKReport Prepared by: Vanessa Aubrey, extension 5662For information contact: Chris Jones, extension 5718Date: February 7, 2014


93 BRULE GARDENSTo construct a ground floor addition up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 1, 2, Plan RPM356, Lot 67, Plan RPM539, (93 Brule Gardens), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed.

CFN: 50461 - Application #: 0047/14/TORReport Prepared by: Vanessa Aubrey, extension 5662For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259

54

Date: January 30, 2014

65 TILDEN CRESCENTTo change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Part Lot 61 Lot 60, Plan 2199, (65 Tilden Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed.

CFN: 50579 - Application #: 0112/14/TORReport Prepared by: Vanessa Aubrey, extension 5662For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259Date: February 25, 2014

126 BABY POINT ROADTo construct a non-habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft), construct a ground floor addition up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) and change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 262, Plan 1582, (126 Baby Point Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed.


4 MOUNTAIN ASH COURTTo install a swimming pool and undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) on Lot 131, Plan M-944, (4 Mountain Ash Court), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Mike and Michelle Griffin.



40 WALKER ROADTo undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) and construct a ground floor addition up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 67, Plan M-442, (40 Walker Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed.

55



59 COPPING ROADTo undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads), construct a non-habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft), construct a ground floor addition up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) and change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 59, Plan 4888, (59 Copping Road), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed.



50 HILLSIDE DRIVETo construct a non-habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Part Lot 42, 43, 50, Plan 2967, (50 Hillside Drive), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed.

CFN: 50205 - Application #: 1027/13/TORReport Prepared by: Vanessa Aubrey, extension 5662For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259Date: January 30, 2014

128 FERRIS ROADTo construct a non-habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft), construct a ground floor addition or structure greater than 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) but less than 150 sq. m (1614 sq. ft) and change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 1, Plan M-630, (128 Ferris Road), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed.


56

1690 GERRARD STREET EASTTo construct a non-habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Part Lot 2, Plan 459E, (1690 Gerrard Street East), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed.


TOWN OF CALEDON

47 ELIZABETH STREETTo construct a non-habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Part Lot 23, 24, Block 3, Plan BOL 7, (47 Elizabeth Street), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed.

CFN: 50460 - Application #: 0046/14/CALReport Prepared by: Anant Patel, extension 5618For information contact: Anant Patel, extension 5618Date: February 18, 2014

TOWNSHIP OF KING

3595 16TH SIDEROADTo undertake minor landscaping involving the placement and the removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) on, 3595 16th Sideroad, in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed.

CFN: 50536 - Application #: 0089/14/KINGReport Prepared by: Jonathan Pounder, extension 5304For information contact: Jonathan Pounder, extension 5304Date: February 12, 2014

Meeting - Executive Committeetrca.on.ca/dotAsset/182059.pdf · a replacement concrete patio and...

Documents

Transcript of Meeting - Executive Committeetrca.on.ca/dotAsset/182059.pdf · a replacement concrete patio and...