Latest Charmonium Results from the PHENIX Experiment at RHIC
Medium and High pT Direct Photons from PHENIX at RHIC A.Bazilevsky For the PHENIX Collaboration...
-
Upload
dustin-bradford -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Medium and High pT Direct Photons from PHENIX at RHIC A.Bazilevsky For the PHENIX Collaboration...
1
Medium and High pT Direct Photons from PHENIX at RHIC
A.BazilevskyFor the PHENIX Collaboration
Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics February 3-10, 2013
Squaw Valley, CA
2
Direct Photons in (polarized) pp
Quark-Gluon Compton scattering is the dominant source of high pT photons in pp collisions (q-qbar annihilation – 10-15%)
Access to gluon (polarized) distributions through factorized pQCD
No fragmentation involved -> access to Sivers function in transversely polarized protons (correlation between proton spin and parton kT)
TMD factorization?
Sivers function universality?
… Also fragmentation photons
See Spin talks by C.McKinney and O.Eyser
3
Direct photons in HIC
Initial Condition:hard
QGP:thermal Jet fragmentationBremsstrahlungJet-photon conversion
Hadron gas:thermal
Time
Photons emitted at all stages of the system evolution
With different characteristic pT spectrum
Once produced photons leave the medium unmodified
Carry dynamical information of the state
Initial state
Init. temperature, thermalization time
Modification of fragmentation (in γ-jet)
…
Turbide, Rapp, Gale,Phys. Rev. C 69 (014903), 2004
4
PHENIX detector for photon measurements
Fine segmented EMCal for γ+RICH&Tracking&Magnet for e+ e-
BBC&ZDC for event characterizationBBC&RxNP for reaction plane
High rate DAQ: 5-7 kHz
TriggerMB (collision) with BBCRare with EMCal (γ), EMCal&RICH (e)
e+e-
pg
5
Direct γ reconstruction: higher pT
p0-tagging (pp and dA):
Statistical subtraction:
80 12 pT(GeV/c)4
pp
RAuAu
Direct γ = Inclusive γ – Hadron_Decay γ
6
Direct γ reconstruction: lower pT
• Source of real photons is also a source of virtual photons decaying into e+e-
• Focus on the mass region where p0 contribution dies out: Mee >mπ0
• For Mee<<pT : M<300 MeV/c2
– qq ->* contribution is small– Mainly from internal conversion of
photons
• Can be converted to real photon yield using Kroll-Wada formula (for Dalitz decay spectra)
One parameter fit: (1-r)fc + r fd
fc: cocktail calc., fd: direct photon calc.
SdNMM
m
M
m
dM
Nd
eeee
e
ee
e
ee
121
41
3
22
2
2
22
q
g*
g q
e+
e-
S~1 for Mee << pT
PRL 104,132301 (2010)
Direct γ = Inclusive γ – Hadron_Decay γ See talk by S.Rolnick
7
pp
Measured up to pT=25 GeV/c
The pQCD NLO calculation is in good agreement with data
Important reference for HI measurements to study hot and cold nuclear effects
PRD 86, 072008 (2012)
The pT range in the previous report. (PRL 2007)
8
pp: scaling
• Plotting cross-sections in p-p and p-pbar from various experiments against xT = 2pT/√s
• Hard scattering process should ~scale with xT (if no αs, PDF evolution, etc.)
• Scale yields by (√s)n
• PHENIX data includes virtual photon results in low pT(1<pT<5GeV/c)
• n=4.5 makes a universal line
• n=4 for pure gluon exchange with no evolution of αs, PDF, etc.
PRD 86, 072008 (2012)
9
pp: event shape
Checked the event shape with an isolation cut
Generally the theory calculation agrees with dataDeviation from theory at low pT?
How reliable is theory at low pT?
At high pT most direct photons are isolatedDecay photons are not isolated (as expected)
Econe < 0.1E
PRD 86, 072008 (2012)
10
Application to proton spin structure studies
Clean access to ΔG
But needs more luminosity and larger acceptance (-> RHIC upgrade, sPHENIX)
See talk by C.McKinney
See talk by O.Eyser
Projected stat. sensitivity3.0<|η|<3.8Includes correction for background from π0, η
Gives access to Sivers function (correlation between proton spin and parton kT)
11
AuAu: RAAPRL 109, 152302 (2012)
L in p+pNcoll
RAA~1 : Consistent with binary scaling of p+p.
Minimum bias
0-5%
60-92%
… Though many mechanisms may affect it (and/or compensate each other): Isospin difference, nPDF, CroninSuppression of fragmentation photonJet-photon conversion, Bremsstrahlung in QGP, etc.
12
Also CuCu-200GeV and AuAu-62GeV
Cu+Cu at √sNN = 200 GeV
RAA~1 : Consistent with binary scaling of p+p.
13
AuAu: RAA
Initial state effects (IS) include isospin and nuclear PDF, consistent with data
Final state effects (FS) include suppression of jet fragmentation photons and photons from jet-plasma interaction, consistent with data
Another model with both IS and FS disagrees with data
JHEP1104, 055
PRC77, 024909arXiv:0904.2184
PLB669, 337
PRL 109, 152302 (2012)
Need for more precise data
14
dAu
Rd+Au is consistent with 1.It suggests little or no nuclear effect within our uncertainty.Consistent with theory calculations with CNM effects
arXiv:1208.1234Theory calculations fromI.Vitev et al., PLB669, 337 (2008)
15
dAuWe have x30 statistics in Run8 compared to published Run3. Will help to constrain the gluon PDF further.
arXiv:1012.1178
RHIC range
16
v2
annihilationComptonscattering
Medium induced(inc.energy loss)
jet
jet fragment photon v2 > 0
v2 > 0
v2 < 0Hard scattering photons: v2~0
• V2 depends on production processS. Turbide, C. Gale and R.J. Fries, PRL 96, 032303 (2006)
• V2 is sensitive to thermalization timeR. Chatterjee and D. K. Srivastava PRC 79, 021901 (2009)
More details in talk by S.Rolnick
17
v2
At high pT, v2~0. It is consistent with the hard scattering source. At low pT (thermal region), an unexpectedly large v2 is observed!
It depends on the formation timeTheory predictions are a bit small.
PRL 109, 122302 (2012)
MB (0-92%) 0-20% 20-40%
calculation from PRC 79, 021901(R)
More discussion on low pT v2 in talk by S.Rolnick
18
PHENIX upgrade for photons
3.1<h<3.8
To be ready for Run-14/15
Initial condition for HIGluon Distribution in CNM at Low-x
Direct photons (h, 0 suppression + isolation cut)
MPCEX
A combined charged particle tracker and EM preshower detector – dual gain readout allows sensitivity to MIPs and full energy EM showers.
• Direct photons• p0 reconstruction out to >80GeV• Charged track identification
MPC
MPC-EX
More details in talk by S.Cambell
19
PHENIX -> sPHENIX
A plan to upgrade the detector.
Large acceptance with high /0 separation.More tracking layers, hope eID is still powerful.Hadron calorimeter for +Jet analysis.
High Rate capability and large acceptance : 106 jets per year above 30 GeV/c104 direct per year above 20 GeV/c
More details in talk by D.Morrison
20
Summary• p+p reference measurements are on the universal curve of world’s
measurements; in agreement with NLO pQCD
• dAu: RdA ~1; expected nuclear modification within current uncertainites
• AuAu: No nuclear modification (RAA~1) in high pT photon (> 5 GeV/c)
• v2~0 at pT>4 GeV/c: consistent with prompt (hard) photons
• A challenging probe, both experimentally and theoretically Need for more precise measurements in wider kin. range with a variety of observables (RAA, v2, v3, …, HBD …) Short and long term PHENIX upgrade plan
γ for SpinBy C.McKinney and O.Eyser
Low pT and v2By S.Rolnick
γ-h correlationBy A.Hanks
PHENIX UpgradeBy S.Campbell and D.Morrison
24
Low pT -> thermal arXiv:1208.1234
• g fraction = Yielddirect / Yieldinclusive
• Lines are NLO pQCD calculation with scales μ= 0.5pT, 1.0pT, 2.0pT
• Largest excess above pQCD is seen at Au+Au
• Nuclear effect measured in d+Au does not explain the photons in Au+Au
RAA>1 at pT<3 GeV/c, whereas RdA~1
Medium effects (additional source of direct photons) in AuAu
25
Low pT -> thermal
Au+Au
PRL 104,132301 (2010)
First information about the temperature of the system averaged over the space-time evolution of the collision
From fit to exp + ncoll scaled pp:
Tave = 221 19stat 19syst MeV (MB)
Small (if any) centrality dependence
NLO pQCD consistent with p+p down to pT=1 GeV/c
Excess of photons (with 1<pT <3 GeV/c) in Au+Au beyond the Ncoll
scaled p+p yield.
Interpreted as thermal radiation emitted by the medium
26
Initial temperature & formation time
Tc~170MeV from lattice QCD
PRC 81, 034911 (2010)
All above the critical temperature Tinit depends on 0 assumption
Need observable to constrain initial conditions
Tini = 300 to 600 MeV t0 = 0.15 to 0.5 fm/c
28
Initial kT broadening or recombination?• Recombination model claims that the Cronin effect in hadron production is
built up by recombination– e.g. R. Hwa, Eur.Phys.J.C43:233(2005)– Cronin effect in direct photon production should be smaller than one in p0
• Within quoted errors, the effect is same for p0 and photon production
p0 RAA in d+Au at 200GeV. PRL91, 072303 (2003)
29
• Bremsstrahlung from hard scattered partons in medium (Jet in-medium bremsstrahlung)
• Compton scattering of hard scattered and thermal partons (Jet-photon conversion)
31
Au-Au vs Cu-Cu
Could d+d collisions help? (One could tag pp, pn, nn collisions!)
At 62GeV there is no experimental difficulty
The isospin effect should be (almost) independent of centrality
Little overlap with Cu+Cu, but the two are consistent within errors
32
Is it (only) an isospin effect?• Taking for example, the isospin effect: Direct photon cross-sections for p+p, p+n and n+n are different because of different charge contents ( eq
2)
• Effect can be estimated from NLO pQCD calclation of p+p, p+n and n+n– In low pT, quarks are from gluon split no difference between n and p– At high pT, contribution of constituent quarks manifests
• Minimum bias Au+Au can be calculated by:
)Z)-(A Z)-2Z(A (Z)(1/A /N nn2
pnpp22
collAA
(sAA/Ncoll)/spp vs pT (sAA/Ncoll)/spp vs xT
Same suppression will be seen in lower pT at sNN=62.4GeV
TS, INPC07, arXiv.org:0708.4265
33
STAR
STAR, Phys.Rev.C81,064904(2010)
• Excess in d+Au?– No exponential excess
• High-pT direct photon results from PHENIX and STAR– d+Au
• Agree with TAB scaled pQCD
• consistent with PHENIX and STAR– p+p
• Agree with pQCD and PHENIX
• Low-pT direct photon – No publication data at STAR
35
v2
12
.2.
2
R
vvRv
BGincdir
Consistency between EMCal photons and internal conversion photons (at low pT)
36
v2
• High pT (pT>5 GeV/c)– v2 ~ 0 (independent of
centrality)– Consistent with STAR
results within large error.
• Low pT (pT<3 GeV/c)– Inconclusive centrality
dependence
STAR, arXiv:1008.4894
PHENIX, arXiv:1105.4126
Cent20-40%Cent0-20%
Cent10-40%
37
Direct photon v2
PRL 109, 122302 (2012)
Au+Au √sNN = 200 GeVminimum bias
• Large v2 at pT < 4 GeV/c where thermal photons dominate
• v2 consistent with 0 at high pT where prompt photons domininate
Very surprising result: large v2 implies late emission whereas thermal radiation implies early emission
Models have difficulties in reproducing simultaneously yield and v2 of photons
38
Direct photon v2
pT (GeV/c)
dir. v
2
Large v2 of low pT thermal photon
200GeV Au+Au 0-20%
R. Chatterjee and D. K. SrivastavaPRC 79, 021901(R) (2009)PRL96, 202302 (2006)
Several models have failed in v2 magnitude with similar shape
• Thermal photon in quark matter– v2>0 at low pT
– v2~0 at high pT
• Thermalization time t0
– Early (smaller v2)
– Late (larger v2)
• Constrain t0
– Measure v2 at low pT
Hydro after t0
40
This fits to data well, but..• Large flow can not be produced in partonic phase, but could be in
hadron gas phase
• This model changed ingredients of photon spectra drastically!– We realized the importance of the data…
thermal + prim. g
van Hees, Gale, Rapp, PRC84, 054906 (2011)
41
v2: theory comparison0-20% Phys. Rev. C 84, 054906 (2011)
H. van Hees, C. Gale, R. Rapp
• Important features/differences from hydrodynamic expansion– Larger equilibrium hadronic rates– Hadronic phase includes meson-chemical potentials– Hadronic phase lasts longer (smaller Tfo and larger Tch)– Elliptic flow builds up faster
• Thermal radiation dominated by hadronic phase• Is the QGP window closed?
43
FF shape modification
43
xE = -pTh/pT
g cos(Df)~zT = -x ln xE - MLLA variable Universal scaling in pp Enhancement at very low zT Suppression at large zT
- pQCD photons provide a reasonable estimate for the energy of recoil jet (q or g);
- Measured medium FF is softer compared to vacuum fragmentation;
- Further studies with jets tagged by strangess (gluon / quark jet separation) follow