Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology

10
MEDICAL SCIENCE LIAISONS IN ONCOLOGY (2016) MARCH, 2016 PREVIEW OF

Transcript of Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology

MEDICAL SCIENCELIAISONS INONCOLOGY (2016)

M A R C H , 2 0 1 6

P R E V I E W O F

REPORT OVERVIEW

HOW YOU CAN USE THIS REPORT

Biopharmaceutical research companies efforts to bring new, more effective treatments to market represent the world’s best hopes to provide oncologists with the drugs needed to give cancer patients longer, healthier lives and reduce the burden of the disease on society. To garner awareness, interest, and trial for any of oncological medications in development in the highly competitive US cancer drug market, biopharmaceutical manufacturers must develop sales/ information strategies that best serve oncologists’ needs. These strategies will certainly employ Medical Science Liaisons (MSLs) in addition to traditional sales representatives. ISR’s Medical Science Liaison in Oncology offers insights into how oncologists engage with 20 biopharmaceutical manufacturer’s MSLs. This report contains critical knowledge on how manufacturers can best engage oncologists in a drug’s story.

153 PAGES

20 COMPANIES

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

MAJOR SECTIONS:1. Access to Oncologists

2. MSL Performance

3. The MSL Interaction Experience

4. Information Strategies

5. Study Data

Full list of companies included on next page.

• Understand how US oncologists want to be engaged

• Learn which sales and marketing mix matches with what oncologists expect

• Discover the traits of the best MSLs, and which biopharmaceutical firms field MSLs exceed or fail to meet oncologists’ expectations

• Uncover what type of interactions oncologists view as appropriate and effective boundaries not to cross when engaging with an oncologist.

• Pinpoint the information oncologists find most valuable and the best sales channels for delivering specific types of data/ information

D A T A C O L L E C T I O N I N Q 1 , 2 0 1 6

3 0 - M I N U T E W E B - B A S E D

S U R V E Y

1 0 1 O N C O L O G I S T S F R O M U S , E U R O P E ,

A N D A S I A

COMPANIES INCLUDED

ATTRIBUTES MEASURED

AbbVie

Amgen

Astellas

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eisai

Eli Lilly

GSK

Incyte

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Otsuka

Pfizer

Pharmacyclics

Roche

Sanofi

Takeda

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

KNOWLEDGE FACTORS• Knowledge of science• Knowledge of the current clinical trial

environment• Knowledge of the regulatory

environment• Knowledge of the reimbursement

environment• Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

SERVICE FACTORS• Being responsive to your needs• Creating value for your practice• Delivering great service• Putting your needs first• Treating you as a peer/ partner in

patient care

each company is evaluated

based on 10 CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES

data are included for all 20

manufacturers, but companies

with more than 10

performance evaluations

(bold) receive a full profile

Companies listed bold have been reviewed by 10 or more respondents. These providers have in-depth performance analysis.

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOR FULL TABLE OF CONTENTS, PLEASE DOWNLOAD THE FULL PREVIEW AT:

HTTPS://WWW.ISRREPORTS.COM/REPORTS/MEDICAL-SCIENCE-LIAI-SONS-ONCOLOGY-2016/

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

STUDY FINDINGS

14www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Restrictions on DetailingThe restrictions oncology practices/ organizations place on MSLs and sales reps do not appear to be overly burdensome� Many practices/ organizations require MSLs to set-up an appointment (52%) or restrict the duration/ number/ location of meetings (31%)�

Sales reps are substantially more likely to face restrictions on offering meals, gifts, or financial benefits to oncologists and the practice (27%) than MSLs, who, by definition, serve as scientific or disease state experts for oncologists� It is worth noting that one-in-ten (10%) oncology practices/ organizations require MSLs to demonstrate a non-sales agenda in order to gain access to oncologists�

Please describe any and all restrictions your practice/ organization has regarding the interactions with MSLs (Medical Science Liaisons). (Base=29, restrictions on MSL detailing in place)

Please describe any and all restrictions your practice/ organization has regarding the interactions with pharmaceutical sales representatives. (Base=49, restrictions on sales rep detailing in place)

MEDICAL SCIENCE LIAISONS IN ONCOLOGY (2016) 16

Restrictions on Detailing The restrictions oncology practices/ organizations place on MSLs and sales reps do not appear to be overly burdensome. Many practices/ organizations require MSLs to set-up an appointment (52%) or restrict the duration/ number/ location of meetings (31%). Sales reps are substantially more likely to face restrictions on offering meals, gifts, or financial benefits to oncologists and the practice (27%) than MSLs, who, by definition, serve as scientific or disease state experts for oncologists. It is worth noting that one-in-ten (10%) oncology practices/ organizations require MSLs to demonstrate a non-sales agenda in order to gain access to oncologists. Please describe any and all restrictions your practice/ organization has regarding the interactions with MSLs (Medical Science Liaisons). (Base=29, restrictions on MSL detailing in place) Please describe any and all restrictions your practice/ organization has regarding the interactions with pharmaceutical sales representatives. (Base=49, restrictions on sales rep detailing in place)

2%

2%

16%

27%

33%

22%

3%

7%

10%

31%

52%

0% 20% 40% 60%

Cannot see reps but can see MSLs

Can only receive samples

Seeing reps/MSLs is permitted but isdiscouraged by practice management

No meals, gifts, financial benefit to oncologistor practice

MSL must demonstrate/ have a non-salesagenda

Restricted to specific duration/ Number ofmeetings per week or month/ Location in

practice

Must set-up an appointment

% of Respondents

MSLs

Sales Reps

© Industry Standard Research

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

S A M P L E P A G E :

OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACCESS

ISR knows oncologists must manage their time wisely to treat patients, manage their business, and learn about new medications. In this report, ISR establishes the level of restrictions oncologists place between themselves and MSLs/ Pharmaceutical sales representatives. Data on visit recency and duration are also described. ISR also looks at oncologists preferred sales channel for receiving information about first-in-class medications, novel MOAs, and follow-on oncology products.

C L O S E R L O O K

Understand the various types of restrictions MSLs will face, from requirements to set up meeting times, to restrictions on duration and number of meetings, to the need to demonstrate a non-sales agenda

Learn more in the full report: www.ISRreports.com

STUDY FINDINGS

14www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Restrictions on DetailingThe restrictions oncology practices/ organizations place on MSLs and sales reps do not appear to be overly burdensome� Many practices/ organizations require MSLs to set-up an appointment (52%) or restrict the duration/ number/ location of meetings (31%)�

Sales reps are substantially more likely to face restrictions on offering meals, gifts, or financial benefits to oncologists and the practice (27%) than MSLs, who, by definition, serve as scientific or disease state experts for oncologists� It is worth noting that one-in-ten (10%) oncology practices/ organizations require MSLs to demonstrate a non-sales agenda in order to gain access to oncologists�

Please describe any and all restrictions your practice/ organization has regarding the interactions with MSLs (Medical Science Liaisons). (Base=29, restrictions on MSL detailing in place)

Please describe any and all restrictions your practice/ organization has regarding the interactions with pharmaceutical sales representatives. (Base=49, restrictions on sales rep detailing in place)

MEDICAL SCIENCE LIAISONS IN ONCOLOGY (2016) 16

Restrictions on Detailing The restrictions oncology practices/ organizations place on MSLs and sales reps do not appear to be overly burdensome. Many practices/ organizations require MSLs to set-up an appointment (52%) or restrict the duration/ number/ location of meetings (31%). Sales reps are substantially more likely to face restrictions on offering meals, gifts, or financial benefits to oncologists and the practice (27%) than MSLs, who, by definition, serve as scientific or disease state experts for oncologists. It is worth noting that one-in-ten (10%) oncology practices/ organizations require MSLs to demonstrate a non-sales agenda in order to gain access to oncologists. Please describe any and all restrictions your practice/ organization has regarding the interactions with MSLs (Medical Science Liaisons). (Base=29, restrictions on MSL detailing in place) Please describe any and all restrictions your practice/ organization has regarding the interactions with pharmaceutical sales representatives. (Base=49, restrictions on sales rep detailing in place)

2%

2%

16%

27%

33%

22%

3%

7%

10%

31%

52%

0% 20% 40% 60%

Cannot see reps but can see MSLs

Can only receive samples

Seeing reps/MSLs is permitted but isdiscouraged by practice management

No meals, gifts, financial benefit to oncologistor practice

MSL must demonstrate/ have a non-salesagenda

Restricted to specific duration/ Number ofmeetings per week or month/ Location in

practice

Must set-up an appointment

% of Respondents

MSLs

Sales Reps

© Industry Standard Research

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

S A M P L E P A G E :

SERVICE PROVIDER PERFORMANCEAs part of the “MSL Performance” section ISR provides an analysis of profiled companies’ service attribute ratings. This chart shows MSL knowledge characteristics, but the report also includes ratings for MSL service.

The full data are available in the report, which can be downloaded from www.ISRreports.com.

D A T A H A V E B E E N R A N D O M I Z E D . F U L L C H A R T A V A I L A B L E I N T H E R E P O R T .

Company A

Company B

Company C

Company D

Company E

Company F

Company G

Company H

Company I

Company J

Company K

Company L

Company M

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

STUDY FINDINGS

24www.ISRreports.com ©2016 Medical Science Liaisons in Oncology (2016)

Knowledge Factor

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Amgen

AstraZeneca

Bayer

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Celgene

Eli Lilly

GSK

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Takeda

Knowledgeof

science

Knowledge of the

current trialenvironment

Knowledge of the

regulatory environment

Knowledge of the

reimbursementenvironment

Knowledge of what drives success in

your practice

This is an enterprise-wide license and this file is not to be distributed beyond the terms of this agreement. For information on the license holder, please contact ISR ([email protected]).

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

FOR ADDITIONAL SAMPLE PAGES, PLEASE DOWNLOAD THE FULL PREVIEW AT:

HTTPS://WWW.ISRREPORTS.COM/REPORTS/MEDICAL-SCIENCE-LIAI-SONS-ONCOLOGY-2016/

TO LEARN MORE: CONTACT US AT [email protected] OR +1(919)301-0106

Biosimilars & Biologics

Clinical Trial Recruitment &

Retention

Commercialization Department Models & Structures

Trends & Technologies

Manufacturing Service Provider Quality Benchmarking

CUSTOM RESEARCH

UNDERSTAND YOUR MARKETSLeverage ISR’s experience and institutional knowledge to create a fit-for-purpose market research project that addresses the business decisions you need to make.

Are you:• Developing a new product or service?• Evaluating a new market?• Targeting a new customer segment?• Entering a new geography?• Needing a deeper understanding of your

customer or potential customer base?

UNDERSTAND YOUR CUSTOMERSWho makes the decisions and in what contexts? ISR can help you gain a deeper understanding of your customers’ decision-making units (DMUs) and decision-making processes (DMPs).

Key Questions Addressed:• What motivates the purchase decision?• How are companies, products, solutions, and/or

brands evaluated?• What factors drive the final buying decision?• Where are your customers won or lost in the

purchasing process?• Why were specific opportunities won or lost?• How do you keep customers engaged and

manage their loyalty over time?

CUSTOM RESEARCH SERVICES• Investigator Forum• Brand, Advertising, and Message Testing• Loyalty Management• New Product and Service Development• Competitive Intelligence• Strategy War Games• MORE

S O M E T H I N G T O C O N S I D E R

DISTINCTIVE – Receive novel insights from industry decision-makers on topics including: service provider quality, patient recruitment, biosimilars, clinical technology, manufacturing, clinical operations, and commercial activities.

UNRESTRICTED – ISR doesn’t sell seats. Instantly obtain access for all employees within your organization

AFFORDABLE – Receive access to ALL reports in ISR’s library, as well as those released during your subscription period. ISR’s competitive library pricing equates to the cost of a few individual report purchases.

LIBRARY ACCESS SUBSCRIPTIONISR’s library access subscription provides your entire organization access to our full library of syndicated market research reports (100+ titles) plus access to all reports (~25 per year) released during your subscription period. Our research categories include:

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

ORDERING INFORMATION

Industry Standard Research (ISR) is the premier, full service market research provider to the pharma and pharma services industries.  With over a decade of experience in the industry, ISR delivers an unmatched level of domain expertise.   For more information about our off-the-shelf intelligence and custom research offerings, please visit our Web site at www.ISRreports.com, email [email protected], or follow us on twitter @ISRreports.

ABOUT INDUSTRY STANDARD RESEARCH

>> R E G I S T E R N O W>>Receive $250 instant credit towards any ISR report

>>Earn 10% credit towards all future purchases

>>Receive advanced notifications on ISR’s latest reports and free resources

SAVE ON THIS, OR ANY ISR REPORT, BY CREATING A FREE ACCOUNT

FOR PRICING AND ORDERING INFORMATION, PLEASE DOWNLOAD THE FULL PREVIEW AT:

HTTPS://WWW.ISRREPORTS.COM/REPORTS/MEDICAL-SCIENCE-LIAI-SONS-ONCOLOGY-2016/

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

www.ISRreports.com ©2013 | Preview of: Benchmarking the Pharma Industry’s HEOR Functions 10

act with confidence

www.ISRreports.com ©2015 | Preview of: Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Disease and Pipeline Analysis 10

act with confidence

www.ISRreports.com ©2013 | Preview of: Benchmarking the Pharma Industry’s HEOR Functions 10

act with confidence

www.ISRreports.com ©2014 | Preview of: Benchmarking European Investigator Payments 10

act with confidence

www.ISRreports.com ©2013 | Preview of: Benchmarking the Pharma Industry’s HEOR Functions 10

act with confidence

The ISR DifferenceCustom-quality syndicated market research

www.ISRreports.com

ISR's Reports The Common Syndicated Reportvs.

How confident are you?

vs.Data Collection

ISR's proprietary data collection tools and channels support fast,

high quality data collection

Struggle to recruit the right targets and enough of them

vs.Sample Sizes

Robust sample sizes that instill confidence

Often insufficient industry representation that leaves you

defending results

vs.vs.Research methods

Mostly primary research;

always appropriate for the topic

One size fits all; usually publically

available data

vs.vs.Respondents

Sophisticated screening ensures genuine decision-makers

Undisclosed methodologies and

respondent demographics

vs.vs.Analysts

Decades of experience means more insights that are

immediately usable

Junior analysts capable of reporting numbers