‘Meddle Not with Them that Are Given to Change ’: Innovation as Evil BENOÎT GODIN Workshop on...
-
Upload
clarissa-jones -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
4
Transcript of ‘Meddle Not with Them that Are Given to Change ’: Innovation as Evil BENOÎT GODIN Workshop on...
‘Meddle Not with Themthat Are Given to Change ’:Innovation as Evil
BENOÎT GODINWorkshop on the Rhetoricof Innovation in Contemporary SocietyUniversity of Helsinki8-9 February 2010
Introduction
- Greely et al., Nature, 2008- Greeks and Romans political thought
(more on this later)- Reformation
- Edward VI, A Proclamation Against Those that Doeth Innovate, 1548
- Common Prayer Book, 1549- Act of Uniformity, 1549
Introduction (continued)
- How, when and why did innovation become a positive value?
- Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation- Innovation as a category- Representations of innovation- Origins, context, meaning, uses, values,
discourses, theories, measurements
Introduction (continued)
- A forgotten concept- German Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe
project (Brunner, Conze and Koselleck, 1972 and after)
- Dictionary of the History of Ideas (1974)- Raymond Williams’ Keywords (1976)- Ideas in Context series (like Ball, Farr and
Hanson, 1989)
Introduction (continued)
- Innovation controversy, 1636-41
- Henry Burton versus Archbishop William Laud and ‘laudians’ (P. Heylin, C. Dow)- Purity of Protestantism- Introduction of popery
Henry Burton
- For God and the King, 1636
- My Sonne, feare thou the Lord, and the King, and meddle not with them that are given to change. For their calamity shall rise suddenly; and who knoweth the ruine of them both?
- An exegesis and accusation
Burton (continued)
- The exegesis- An exhortation: My Sonne, feare thou the
Lord, and the King- An admonition: and meddle not with them
that are given to change- A Reason: For their calamity shall rise
suddenly; and who knoweth the ruine of them both?
Burton (continued)
- The accusation: eight innovations- Doctrine- Discipline- Worship of God- Civil Government- Altering of Books- Means of Knowledge- Rule of Faith- Rule of Manners
Burton (continued)
- Innovation: a political (and contested) category- Ancient political thought (more on this later, again)- Proclamations and Declarations
- Edward VI (1548, 1549)- Charles I (1626, 1628, 1638)
- Burton- Political vocabulary; political issues; political effects- Crossing boundaries and using a category for one’s own
purpose- Burton as ‘innovative ideologist’
- Uses the category for polemical purposes- Uses it against the authority
Laud and laudians
- No innovation- Ad hominem: a frustrated individual- Ad populum: popularity- Invention, fancy- Misunderstanding and misinterpretation- Conjecture- History (times and circumstances)- Symbolic- Renovation- Revolution (rebellion and sedition)
Laud and laudians (continued)
- 1937: Burton brought before the Court (High Commission)
- He had his ears cut and was sentenced to imprisonement
The Parliament
- End of the controversy- After three years, he is released by
Parliament and becomes a popular hero- Orders from the House of Commons
(1941)- Proceedings of the bishops (1941)- Laud beheaded (1945)
Explaining Innovation
- Context: orthodoxy
- Meaning: ‘introducing change’
- Value: pejorative
- Uses- Prohibition (Kings)- Polemical (Burton)
- A subjective category
Genealogy
1. Politics- Greek and Roman political thought on change
(metabole, parekbasis) and stability (soteria) of constitutions: Plato, Aristotle, Polybius, Livy
- Change as intermediary; gradualism- Innovation (kainotomia)
- A metaphor (Xenophon); meaning: introducing change- Pejorative representation (individuals)
- N. Machiavelli• Princes should innovate to secure power (usefulness)• People do not innovate (resistances)• Early and fast – to make people forget (strategy)
Genealogy (continued)
2. Religion- Reformation (a new orthodoxy)
- People should not innovate
- Even the King does not innovate (Charles, 1638)
Genealogy (continued)
- Impact 1: few uses of innovation (until 20th century)- Science
- New everywhere, but:- Innovation used by enemies (novellists, etc.)- Satires
- Literary criticism: own vocabulary (invention, then imagination, creation)
- (Mechanical) arts: invention, projectors
Genealogy (continued)
- Impact 2: two vocabularies- Alteration, innovation (as novelty,
invention, opinion, fancy: individual)- Versus change (natural, social; but
intermediary)
- Reformation, restoration, renovation- Italian: XXXX; German: erneuerung- But: no substitute to innovation
- Then: revolution
Genealogy (continued)
3. Technology and theorists on modernity and progress (philosophy, sociology and economics)- Goes back to F. Bacon
- Novelty (as curiosity, subtlety) versus invention (as usefulness)- Vocabulary of restoration, but forward-looking (totally new
foundations)- ‘Strategic’ thoughts on how to deal with innovation (like
Machiavelli)- Usefulness, resistances, ‘strategy’ (slowly, as time goes – to get
people accustomed)
- But took time- Projectors: innovation as cheat; satires- Rehabilitation: D. Defoe; J. Bentham
Genealogy (continued)
- Technology’s theorists- Anthropologists: cultural change (diffusion
controversy)- Sociologists: social change (Tarde, Ogburn)- Economists: technological change
(Schumpeter, Maclaurin), then technological innovation( Manchester, Sussex/SPRU)
- Policy (and statistics)
Genealogy (continued)
4. Creativity- Idea of ability in Machiavelli- An old tradition
- Psychology of imagination (combination)- Literary criticism: imagination, creation- 1950 and after: rise of a literature on creativity; buzzword
- A few precursors: Schumpeter (creative destruction), Usher, Barnett
- But mainly indirect, through:- Invention (technology)
- Rossman on creative inventors (new subtitle in 1964)- R&D
- R defined as original, creative work (NBER, 1962; OECD FM, 1962)- R&D as proxy to innovation
Conclusion
Innovation: an everyday category- From: innovation as heresy (religion),
revolutionary (politics) and cheat (business)- To: innovation as an obsession and panacea
- Extension (social innovation)- Metaphor (biological innovation)- Greely et al.- ‘Innovation’ (instead of ‘technological innovation’):
dominant and hegemonic representation