Mechanical and thermal performance of a geopolymeric and hybrid ...
Mechanical Properties of PDMS and the Use of Hybrid ...
Transcript of Mechanical Properties of PDMS and the Use of Hybrid ...
Mechanical Properties of PDMS and the Use of Hybrid
Polymer-Grafted Carbon Microspheres as Stimuli-Responsive
Lubricating Particles
AN ABSTRACT SUBMITTED ON THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF
APRIL 2020
TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
OF TULANE UNIVERSITY
FOR THE DEGREE
OF
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
BY: ___________________________
Shreyas Oak
APPROVED: ________________________
Noshir Pesika, Ph.D.
Director
_______________________
Julie Albert, Ph.D.
_______________________
Vijay John, Ph.D.
_______________________
Damir Khismatullin, Ph.D.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FE42D38-0CCB-4EE5-A968-41F5C1EE5913DocuSign Envelope ID: 21E9D8C1-FDBE-4FAB-B264-5AC453A4855F
ii
Abstract
Polymers are one of the widely used materials within a short time after their discovery.
They are used in various industries such as automobiles, food, personal care, etc. Polymers
can be categorized in various ways, depending on their structure, stimulus responsiveness,
toughness, etc. Therefore, it is important to characterize the properties of polymers.
In the first part of my thesis, two different methods of measuring the modulus of PDMS
are described. The two tests viz Compression test and Hertz Indentation are used to study
the correlation between the degree of polymer cross-linking and the resulting Young’s
modulus. The polymer used in this study, PDMS can be made softer or harder, depending
on the ratio of the base to the cross-linker. We show that PDMS has a high Young’s
modulus for smaller ratios of the base to cross-linker and vice versa. This observation holds
for both types of tests.
In the second part of my thesis, we explore the use of PNIPAm-grafted carbon
microspheres (CM) dispersed in water as a stimulus responsive lubricant. It is found that a
critical concentration between 3 and 5 mg/mL PNIPAm-grafted CM is needed to achieve
low friction (coefficient of friction ∼ 0.04) at room temperature. An increase in the
temperature of the system above the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) causes the
aggregation of PNIPAm-grafted CM which leads to an increase in friction forces for all
concentrations of PNIPAm grafted CM in water. A mechanism to explain the lubrication
properties of PNIPAm-grafted CM is proposed which points toward the need of particle
singlets at sufficiently high concentrations within the confined region to achieve low
friction through a rolling mechanism.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FE42D38-0CCB-4EE5-A968-41F5C1EE5913DocuSign Envelope ID: 21E9D8C1-FDBE-4FAB-B264-5AC453A4855F
iii
Mechanical Properties of PDMS and the Use of Hybrid
Polymer-Grafted Carbon Microspheres as Stimuli-Responsive
Lubricating Particles
A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED ON THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF
APRIL 2020
TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
OF TULANE UNIVERSITY
FOR THE DEGREE
OF
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
BY: ___________________________
Shreyas Oak
APPROVED: ________________________
Noshir Pesika, Ph.D.
Director
_______________________
Julie Albert, Ph.D.
_______________________
Vijay John, Ph.D.
_______________________
Damir Khismatullin, Ph.D
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FE42D38-0CCB-4EE5-A968-41F5C1EE5913DocuSign Envelope ID: 21E9D8C1-FDBE-4FAB-B264-5AC453A4855F
© Copyright by Shreyas Oak 2020
All Rights Reserved
ii
Acknowledgments
This work is dedicated to my family and my mentors, who have supported me throughout
my academic career and encouraged me to see learning as a life-long pursuit. I want to
thank with sincere gratitude the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department at
Tulane University for providing me with a positive and intellectual environment and a
wealth of resources and infrastructure to make this work possible. The faculty and staff
have been immensely encouraging throughout the program at Tulane University. I would
like to send a special acknowledgment to my adviser Dr. Noshir Pesika, whose support and
guidance were instrumental in the completion of this project. I would also like to thank Dr.
Vijay John, Dr. Julie Albert, and Dr. Damir Khismatullin for serving on my committee and
providing me with numerous insights and feedbacks. And last but not least, a special thanks
to all my friends, classmates, and colleagues who have trained me, advised me and with
whom I shared many memorable experiences during my Ph.D.
iii
CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Introduction to PDMS Mechanical Properties .................................................. 1
1.1 Introduction to Polymers Mechanical Properties ...................................................... 1
1.1.1 Young’s Modulus ............................................................................................... 1
1.1.2 Viscosity of Fluids .............................................................................................. 4
1.1.3 Viscoelasticity .................................................................................................... 5
1.2 Introduction to PDMS ............................................................................................... 6
1.2.1 Microstructure of PDMS .................................................................................... 6
1.2.2 Samples for Research ......................................................................................... 7
1.3 The Objectives and Challenges for This Research .................................................... 8
Chapter 2. Modulus measurements ................................................................................... 10
2.1 Introduction to Tensile and Compression Tests ...................................................... 10
2.1.1 Compression Test ................................................................................................. 11
2.1.2 Hertz indentation .............................................................................................. 12
2.2 Samples and Instrumentation .................................................................................. 13
2.2.1 Samples Preparation for Compression Study ................................................... 15
2.2.2. Sample preparation for Hertz Indentation ....................................................... 17
2.3 Analysis Methods .................................................................................................... 18
2.3.1 Compression Study Analysis ............................................................................ 18
2.3.2 Hertz Indentation Analysis ............................................................................... 19
iv
2.4 Results and discussion ............................................................................................. 20
2.4.1 Compression test............................................................................................... 20
2.4.2 Hertz Indentation .............................................................................................. 21
2.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 22
Chapter 3. Friction and wear ............................................................................................. 24
3.1 Mechanisms of friction............................................................................................ 25
3.1.1 Static friction .................................................................................................... 25
3.1.2 Sliding friction .................................................................................................. 27
3.1.3 Fluid friction ..................................................................................................... 27
3.1.4 Rolling friction ................................................................................................. 28
3.2 Lubrication and Wear .............................................................................................. 30
3.2.1 Biotribology ...................................................................................................... 30
3.2.2 Green Tribology ............................................................................................... 31
3.2.3 Nanotribology ................................................................................................... 31
Chapter 4 Carbon And Its Forms ...................................................................................... 33
4.1 Nanotubes: ............................................................................................................... 33
4.2 Carbon Nano onions ................................................................................................ 35
4.3 Fullerenes ................................................................................................................ 36
4.4 Nanofibres ............................................................................................................... 38
4.5 Carbon spheres ........................................................................................................ 40
v
Chapter 5 Stimuli responsive polymers ............................................................................ 42
5.1 Temperature Responsiveness .................................................................................. 43
5.2 pH responsiveness ................................................................................................... 44
5.3 Electromagnetic responsiveness .............................................................................. 45
Chapter 6. Tunable Friction Through Stimuli Responsive Hybrid Carbon Microspheres 47
6.1 Experimental Section .............................................................................................. 49
6.1.1 Carbon Microsphere (CM) Synthesis. .............................................................. 49
6.1.2 Grafting of Carbon Microspheres with PNIPAm. ............................................ 49
6.1.3 Friction Measurements. .................................................................................... 53
6.2 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................ 55
6.3 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 70
6.4 Future Direction ...................................................................................................... 71
Biography .......................................................................................................................... 73
Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 74
vi
List of Equations
Equation [1] Young’s Modulus
Equation [2] Strain
Equation [3] Viscosity according to Newton’s law
Equation [4] Complex Young’s modulus
Equation [5] Stress applied on a cylindrical sample
Equation [6] Hertz equation for the contact between a rigid sphere and elastic flat solid
Equation [7] Effective Young’s Modulus
Equation [8] Coefficient of static friction
Equation [9] Modified Amontons’ Equation
List of Tables
Table 1 Summary of compression study
Table 2 Summary of Hertz Indentation
vii
List of figures
Figure 1 Hooke’s law depiction for an elastic solid. Hooke’s law is obeyed in the straight
segment of the plot, and the slope is 1/k. As higher force is applied, the plot becomes
curved, but the deformation is still elastic, meaning the object will return to its original
shape. Application of higher forces will lead to permanent deformation and ultimately, a
fracture
Figure 2 PDMS chemical formula, where n is the number of repeating monomer units
[SiO[CH3]2]
Figure 3 Mild steel tensile test regimes, plotted as stress vs. strain
Figure 4 Schematic of Hertz Indentation. A solid sphere of Radius R indents an elastic
substrate up to a depth δ. The radius of the indent is α, and the modulus of the substrate is
E
Figure 5 Experimental setup for compression test. A steel disc (12 mm diameter) bigger
than the size of the PDMS disc was used to compress the samples. DFM force sensor was
used with the force range of 50-500 g
Figure 6 Experimental setup for Hertz indentation. A Stainless-Steel sphere 6.3 mm in
diameter was used the probe. Sylgard 184 samples of varying thickness were used to
measure and compare their modulus
Figure 7 Plot of Stress (σ) vs. Strain (ε) for Compression study. The slope of the line
gives us the elastic modulus. Sylgard 184 sample with 10:1 ratio of base: curing agent
was used for this particular sample
viii
Figure 8. Plot of Force (P) vs. Displacement (δ) for Hertz indentation
Figure 9 Plot of Modulus values using compression testing for various values of PDMS
base/curing agent ratios. The modulus value is high for smaller mixing ration and decreases
for higher base/curing agent ratios
Figure 10 Plot of Modulus values using Hertz Indentation for various values of PDMS
base/curing agent ratios. The modulus value is high for smaller mixing ration and
decreases for higher base/curing agent ratios
Figure 11 Summary of Modulus Experiments
Figure 12. Schematic of a typical friction coefficient for two bodies moving against each
other under dry conditions
Figure 13. Hard wheel rolling on and deforming a soft surface, resulting in the reaction
force R from the surface having a component that opposes the motion. (W is some vertical
load on the axle, F is some towing force applied to the axle, r is the wheel radius, and both
friction with the ground and friction at the axle are assumed to be negligible and so are not
shown. The wheel is rolling to the left at a constant speed.) Note that R is the resultant
force from non-uniform pressure at the wheel-roadbed contact surface. This pressure is
greater towards the front of the wheel due to hysteresis.
Figure 14 Single Walled and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Single-walled CNT have 1
Graphene cylinder whereas Multi-Walled CNT have multiple graphene cylinders
Figure 15. HRTEM image of Carbon Nano-onions (left) and schematic of Carbon nano-
onions formed by 3 concentric layers (C60, C240, C540)
ix
Figure 16. Varieties of fullerenes found in natural shungite with different numbers of
carbon atoms: C24, C28, C32, C36, C50, C60, C70
Figure 17. Carbon Nano-Fibres
Figure 18. Carbon Spheres
Figure 19. Temperature Responsive Polymers
Figure 20. pH-Responsive Polymers
Figure 21 Electromagnetic Responsive Polymers
Figure 22. Schematic illustration of the rolling mechanism of grafted CM confined
between a silica lens (green) and a silicon wafer substrate (grey). The grafted particles
(black spheres) with PNIPAm coating (orange) get trapped in the contact region and
lower friction due to rolling
Figure 23. Schematic illustration of the grafting process. (a, b) Macroinitiator preparation,
(c) polymerization of PNIPAm from the surface of the carbon microsphere (CM).
Figure 24. SEM images of (A) bare carbon microspheres after pyrolysis, (B) PNIPAm-
grafted carbon microspheres. The scale bars are 500 and 300 nm for the low and high
magnification images, respectively
Figure 25. DLS measurements of average particle size of PNIPAm-grafted CM dispersed
in deionized water within a temperature range from 25 to 50 °C. The concentration of
particles is 0.1 mg/ml. Each data point is an average of 6 individual measurements along
with their corresponding standard deviations
x
Figure 26. Thermogravimetry (TG) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) data. Thermal
gravimetric analysis (TGA) of CM and PNIPAm-grafted CM were carried out by using a
thermogravimetric analyzer (Seiko, SII EXSTAR6000) under dry air at a flow rate of 150
ml/min and a heating rate of 15 °C/min. Approximately 4 mg of the sample was placed in
ceramic crucibles and the weight loss was recorded over the temperature range 50-900 °C
Figure 27. FTIR spectra of CM and PNIPAm-grafted CM
Figure 28. Plot of friction force versus applied load between a shearing borosilicate
spherical lens and a flat silicon wafer using an aqueous solution containing PNIPAm-
grafted CM at (A) 1 mg/mL, (B) 3 mg/mL, (C) 5 mg/mL, and (D) 10 mg/mL
concentrations. Data points marked by open circles (○) and filled circles (●) correspond to
measurements at 22 and 40 °C, respectively. Data points were fitted to a straight line with
the slope corresponding to the coefficient of friction (CoF). The shear velocity is 0.5 mm/s
over a distance of 10 mm. Error bars represent the standard deviation of friction force
obtained from at least 5 trials.
Figure 29. Plot of friction force versus applied load between a shearing borosilicate
spherical lens and a flat silicon wafer using DI water only at room temperature. Data points
were fitted to a straight line with the slope corresponding to the coefficient of friction
(CoF). The shear velocity is 0.5 mm/s over a distance of 10 mm. Error bars represent the
standard deviation of friction force obtaining from at least 5 trials.
Figure 30. Plot of Friction force Fx vs. Applied load L while shearing a spherical probe on
Silicon wafer in presence of: a)10 mg/mL of bare Carbon Microspheres (CM) in DI water
b)Bare CM in presence of 0.36M SDS
xi
Figure 31. Cryo-SEM images PNIMAm-coated CM. (A) Low temperature, and (B) high-
temperature samples with a concentration of 1 mg/ml PNIMAm-coated CM particles.
Figure 32. Bar chart summarizing the CoF values for the PNIPAm-grafted CM-based
aqueous lubricants at various concentrations below and above the LCST
Figure 33. Plot of the friction force as a function of time using (A) 1 mg/mL and (B) 10
mg/mL concentrations of PNIPAm-grafted CM-based aqueous lubricant at room
temperature (gray data) and high temperature (black data). The stepwise increase in the
applied load as a function of time is superimposed on the graph. The shear distance is 10
mm, and the shear velocity is 0.5 mm/s. The friction force data for the room temperature
experiments have been offset by 2 s to facilitate the visualization of the stiction spikes
Figure 34. Schematic illustration of the proposed mechanism by which PNIPAm-grafted
CM affect the lubrication between two shearing surfaces at low and high temperatures and
under low and high concentrations of PNIPAm-grafted CM dispersed in water. The upper
surface moves in the x-direction relative to the bottom surface at a velocity Vx.
1
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TO PDMS MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES
1.1 Introduction to Polymers Mechanical Properties
It is of great importance to be familiar with some basic mechanical properties of the
material before its application in any field. These properties determine the range of
usefulness of a material, its behavior upon application of repeated applied load, life
expentancy and so on. In this chapter, we will discuss some common terminologies used
to describe the mechanical properties of a material, their stress-strain dependence, and also
talk about the polymer used in this research work, Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS).
1.1.1 Young’s Modulus
Force applied on a body can result in the motion of the body (such as friction and drag) or
can affect its shape1. A change in shape of an object due to the application of a force is
called deformation. The applied force, irrespective of its magnitude, is known to cause
some deformation. If a small force is applied, two important characteristics are observed
for small deformation:
1) The object returns to its original shape and size when the force is removed. This
deformation is called “elastic deformation”2.
2) For such small deformations, the stress is proportional to the strain, and Hooke’s
law is obeyed [equation 1]. The coefficient of proportionality is called Young’s
Modulus.
2
Young’s modulus is named after a 19th-century British scientist named Thomas Young,
and it describes “stiffness” of material, i.e., resistance to deformation upon applied force.
For an ideal elastic solid, Young’s modulus E is expressed according to Hooke’s law3 as,
E,
E=σ/ε [1]
where,
σ is the stress (Force per unit area or F/A) and
ε is the strain.
The strain ε is the change in length per unit original length, that is
ε=(L-L0)/L0 or ΔL/L0 [2]
where,
L0 corresponds to the original length of the object,
L corresponds to the new or changed length of the object.
The applied stress and strain can be either tensile or compressive. From Equation [1], one
can get Young’s modulus E.
Figure 1 shows a generic plot of deformation ΔL versus applied force F. Hooke’s law is
obeyed in the straight segment of the linear region. The slope of the straight segment is 1/E
and E is the Young’s modulus. Upon application of larger forces, the graph becomes
curved, but the deformation is still elastic, which means ΔL will return to zero if the force
is removed. When even greater are applied, the object permanently deforms until it finally
3
fractures. Note that in the plot, the slope increases drastically just before fracture, which
indicates that a small increase in applied force F is producing a large increase in L near the
fracture.
Figure 1. Hooke’s law depiction for an elastic solid4. Hooke’s law is obeyed in the
straight segment of the plot, and the slope is 1/k. As higher force is applied, the plot
becomes curved, but the deformation is still elastic, meaning the object will return to
its original shape. The application of higher forces will lead to permanent deformation
and, ultimately, a fracture.
From Figure 1, it can be seen that for the same strain value, the larger the stress, the larger
is Young’s modulus (stiffer material) and vice versa (softer material).
4
1.1.2 Viscosity of Fluids
Equation 1,2 and Figure 1 describes the behavior of a solid object upon application of a
force, but a similar analogy can be applied for fluids as well. For fluids, their resistance to
deformation at a given rate is often called “thickness” in common language. For example:
Honey is considered thicker than water. Viscosity arises due to the internal friction between
two adjacent layers of fluid that are in motion. For an ideal viscous liquid, Newton’s law5
expresses the shear viscosity, η, defined as:
η=τ /(dγ/dt) [3]
where,
τ represents the shear stress or force per unit area (F/A),
γ represents the shear strain,
and t is the time.
Equation 3 describes viscosity, for simple liquids such as water or toluene, especially at
low shear rates,. For larger values of shear viscosity η, the flow is slower at constant shear
stress6. While Equation 1 describes the mechanical properties of ideal elastic solids and
Equation 3 is used for ideal viscous liquids, neither of these equations can accurately
describe the mechanical behavior of polymers. Polymers tend to show both elastic as well
as viscous behavior. Thus a different term called Complex Young’s Modulus7 is used.
Complex Young’s Modulus is defined as:
E*= E’ + iE'' [4]
Where,
5
E' is the storage modulus and
E'' is the loss modulus.
Note that E=│E*│ and The quantity i represents the square root of minus one.
The storage modulus E’ is a measure of the energy stored elastically during deformation,
and the loss modulus E” is a measure of the energy converted to heat8. Similar definitions
hold true for Complex Shear Modulus G* and other mechanical quantities. When
molecules deform, they store a portion of the energy elastically and dissipate a portion in
the form of heat. The quantity E' is a measure of the energy stored elastically, whereas E''
is a measure of the energy lost as heat.
1.1.3 Viscoelasticity
A material that exhibits both viscous and elastic characteristics when undergoing
deformation is called a Viscoelastic material. A typical viscous material strains linearly
with time when stress is applied, and an elastic material changes its shape and comes back
to its original shape when the stress is removed. As viscoelastic materials show both
viscous as well as elastic properties, the complex modulus is used to describe its
mechanical properties. In order to study their stress-strain behavior, there are two basic
models, namely Maxwell and Kelvin-Voigt9 models. Viscoelasticity results in a lot of
interesting phenomena in polymers. For example, creep and stress relaxation represent the
static viscoelasticity, while lag and internal friction can describe the dynamic
viscoelasticity. Hysitron TriboIndentor can be used to study viscoelasticity can be studied
with dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) utilizing.
6
1.2 Introduction to PDMS
The material used in this research work is a silicon-based polymer called
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), also known as dimethicone. PDMS is one of the most
widely used silicon-based organic polymer and is particularly known for its unusual
rheological (or flow) properties10. It is used in various applications, ranging from contact
lenses and medical devices to elastomers. It is also found in shampoos (makes hair shiny
and slippery), caulk to seal joints, lubricating oils, and heat resistant tiles11. PDMS is
considered to be non-reactive (inert) and is optically clear, non-toxic and non-flammable.
Methyltrichlorosilane, which is a Silane precursor with more acid-forming groups and
fewer methyl groups, can be used to introduce branches or cross-links in the polymer
chains12. Ideally, each molecule of such a compound becomes a branch point. This can be
used to produce hard silicone resins. PDMS network can also be used as a substrate to grow
cells. As the crosslink density in the polymer network can be controlled/tuned, it is used to
mimic living tissues. The main focus of the first of this thesis is to characterize the local
surface mechanical properties of a series of PDMS network samples, which are cured to
different crosslink densities, which results in different mechanical properties.
1.2.1 Microstructure of PDMS
The chemical formula for PDMS is shown below
(H3C)3SiO[Si(CH3)2O]nSi(CH3)3,
where n represents the number of repeating monomer [SiO(CH3)2] units. Its brief molecular
structure is shown in Figure 2.
7
The industrial synthesis starts from dimethylchlorosilane and water following the
reaction:
Si(CH3)2Cl2 + n H2O → [Si(CH3)2O]n + 2n HCl.
Figure 2. PDMS chemical formula13 , where n is the number of repeating monomer
units [SiO[CH3]2]
The long PDMS polymer chains usually have vinyl groups at each end. In order to cross-
link these short chains, a cross-linker, usually polymethylhydrosiloxane, is used. A
network of PDMS polymer is assembled by crosslinking these polymer chains. This
reaction can be catalyzed by Platinum.
1.2.2 Samples for Research
PDMS samples for this research were synthesized using Dow Corning Sylgard 184 silicone
elastomer base and Sylgard 184 silicone elastomer curing agent. Sylgard 184 has dispersed
Silica particles to give additional mechanical stability; thus, it is often called “reinforced
PDMS.” For this research, we will use the words “Sylgard” and “PDMS” interchangeably.
The prepared samples have different base/agent ratios, which means different degrees of
cross-linking. The lower the weight of cross-linker, the softer the PDMS network is due to
8
low degree polymerization. Conversely, the higher the degree of cross-linking, the stiffer
the sample will be. The stiffness of the sample was varied by changing the ratio of
crosslinker to base polymer in this research. The most common type of PDMS network in
literature is PDMS 10:1, which has ten units by weight of Sylgard 184 silicone elastomer
base to 1 unit by weight of Sylgard 184 silicone elastomer cross-linker. For PDMS network
with different base/agent ratios, sdifferent degree of cross-linking can be found. For this
research, a series of PDMS network samples with increasing ratios of base/agent were used
to explore the relationship between Young’s modulus and the ratio of mixing. The samples
used for this research had the following base:curing agent ratios: PDMS network 7:1,
PDMS network 10:1, PDMS network 12:1, PDMS network 15:1, PDMS network 20:1 and
PDMS network 25:1. By changing the ratio of base to cross-linker, one tune the mechanical
properties of PDMS. During the tests, one can get the elastic modulus, compare the data
within different test methods, and obtain the relationship between PDMS network
mechanical properties and its amount of crosslinking.
1.3 The Objectives and Challenges for This Research
The goals of this first part of the research are:
1) Measuring mechanical properties of PDMS network for varying degree of cross-
linking
2) Using two different types of compression tests to compare the results between 2
different measurement methods.
The testing of PDMS network mechanical properties, although common, depends heavily
on the instrument used methods, human errors. These challenges are mostly about two
9
aspects. PDMS being a soft material, shows compatibility issues with industrial type
mechanical property testing machines. Typical instruments cannot provide a low force
control system and cannot easily measure the significant displacement during polymer
testing. The conventional DMA instrument is complicated to control, and the testing
process depends too much on the testing temperature. Second, the PDMS network is mostly
soft, and even for the stiffest sample, its elastic modulus is less than 5 MPa. To make things
further complicated, making a standard specimen for mechanical property testing gets
challenging as the polymer is soft. This can lead to not developing full contact at the
beginning of the experiments, which can result in errors in modulus measurements.
In our lab, we did not have a setup to measure the modulus of soft materials. Thus, we had
to get creative to modify the already existing instrument, Universal Material Tester
(UMT)(CETR, nanotribometer, Campbell, CA). A UMT is an instrument used to measure
surface-surface interaction on a macroscopic level. It is used to measure adhesion,
repulsion, friction between 2 interacting bodies, or surfaces. The feedback mechanism of
UMT allows us to measure forces (compressive, adhesive, friction) with respect to time or
displacement. By using this to our advantage, we were able to modify UMT to enable us
to measure Young’s modulus. A detailed explanation is given in chapter 2.
10
CHAPTER 2. MODULUS MEASUREMENTS
2.1 Introduction to Tensile and Compression Tests
For most of the metals, their Young’s modulus and yield stress can be obtained by a simple
stress-strain plot for a tensile test. The mild steel tensile test result is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Mild steel tensile test regimes plotted as stress vs. strain14
In Figure 3. Stress σ is the applied normal force per unit area of the sample cross-section.
The SI units of stress are Pascals (Pa). Strain ε is the change in length per unit original
length.
Point A corresponds to the proportional limit, which is the upper-stress limit to the linear
relationship.
11
Point B corresponds to the elastic stress. Past this point, the material is yielding, and the
corresponding deformation is called plastic deformation. The rise in the curve is called
strain hardening,
Point E corresponds to the ultimate stress. At this point, the cross-sectional area of the
sample begins to decrease in a localized region of the specimen rather than its entire length.
This is called necking.
Point F corresponds to the point when the specimen breaks. The material’s rupture strength
and the stress corresponding to this point is called fracture stress. The tensile test curve is
different for different materials. For example, for more ductile materials, the proportional
limit is lower, while for brittle materials, there will be no necking. The compression testing
is the opposite of tensile testing but can describe the same properties of materials. For this
research, the modulus was measured in 2 different ways viz: Compression test and Hertz
indentation
2.1.1 Compression Test
Hooke’s law states that Young’s modulus on an elastic solid is a ratio of applied stress and
resultant strain.
E=σ/ε,
Where σ= Force per unit area or stress and ε= (L-L0)/L0 or strain and E= material stiffness
or Young’s modulus. For the same amounts of strain, if the applied stress is high, higher is
Young’s modulus, and stiffer the material becomes. In our study, we have used
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) as our test candidate to measure its modulus. PDMS
samples used in this study were cylindrical (disc) in shape. Hence while calculating stress,
12
sample geometry had to be taken into consideration. The formula for stress (σ) changes as
follows:
σ= (9.8*4*Fz)/ (πD2) for compression test [5]
Where Fz= force applied on the sample, D= diameter of the sample
2.1.2 Hertz indentation
According to Hertz theory, contact between a rigid sphere and elastic material can be used
to measure material modulus (Figure 4). The indentation can be described by the following
equation
P = 4/3 E*R1/2δ3/2 [6]
Where P = applied force,
R = radius of the probe,
δ = displacement (indentation depth),
E* = effective Young’s modulus
E*= E/ (1-𝜈2) [7]
E= Young’s modulus of the soft material,
𝜈=Poisson’s ratio of the soft material
13
Figure 4. Schematic of Hertz Indentation15. A solid sphere of Radius R indents an
elastic substrate up to a depth δ. The radius of the indent is α, and the modulus of
the substrate is E.
Equation 6 assumes that the sample is infinitely thick. In reality, the samples can have a
finite thickness, and it has to be expressed in Equation 6. Many researchers have shown
that for samples with finite thicknesses, the standard Hertzian model can result in large
errors16,17. To address this issue, Dimitriadis et al18. derived a correction factor that can be
added to the Hertzian equation used for a semi-infitine substrate. For samples with a
finite thickness, equation 8 is used:
P= 16
9 ER1/2δ3/2[1+1.133 χ +1.283 χ2 +0.769 χ 3+0.0975 χ4] [8]
Where P = applied force,
R = radius of the probe,
δ = displacement (indentation depth),
E = Young’s modulus
h=sample thickness
χ= √𝑅δ/h
14
In Equation 8, we can see a linear dependence on Young’s modulus E and nonlinear
dependence on Poisson’s ratio 𝜈. For most polymers, it is safe to assume that Poisson’s
ratio 𝜈 is 0.5. Equation 8 can be used for films, biological samples19 or coating of
micrometer size. As the samples were subjected to smaller strain values and were
relatively thicker than the sphere/probe diameter, we have focused primarily on the
standard Hertzian model (Equation 6) and compared the values with modified Hertz
Theory (Equation 8) in plot 11.
15
2.2 Samples and Instrumentation
2.2.1 Samples Preparation for Compression Study
PDMS samples were made by pouring 20 g of PDMS in a plastic petri dish of 9 cm in
diameter. The samples were cured for 24 hours at 65˚C.
After curing, the samples were allowed to sit outside for 2 hours to cool down. Once cooled
off, cylindrical discs were cut out from cured PDMS using a manual punch. These discs
Steel disk
Force Sensor
PDMS Sample
Figure 5. Experimental setup for compression test. A steel disc (12 mm diameter)
bigger than the size of PDMS disc was used to compress the samples. DFM force
sensor was used with the force range of 50-500 g
16
were around 6 mm in diameter and around 4 mm in thickness. Exact diameter and thickness
were measured using digital calipers. CETR Universal Materials Tester (UMT) was used
to conduct compression analysis. DFM sensor with a force range of 50-500g was used
without the spring to avoid additional deflection.
For the compression study, PDMS discs were compressed by a flat steel disc attached to
the sensor (figure 5). The diameter of the steel disc was always bigger than the sample
diameter; thus, the sample was uniformly compressed by the disc. An initial force of 10 g
was applied to the sample to make sure the sample is in complete contact with the probe.
Once complete contact was achieved, the force was increased by increments of 1 g till the
maximum value of 150 g was reached
17
2.2.2. Sample preparation for Hertz Indentation
Sylgard samples were made with the same protocol mentioned for the compression study.
Once they were cured, a metallic ball of 6.3 mm in diameter was pressed on the sample.
In this method, displacement of the probe was controlled instead of the force, and resultant
force value was recorded. The probe was brought down till the force exerted on the sample
was 2 g. The displacement was then increased by 0.01 mm in each step, and the
corresponding force was recorded using the in-built UMT software.
Figure 6. Experimental setup for Hertz indentation. A Stainless-Steel sphere 6.3
mm in diameter was used the probe. Sylgard 184 samples of varying thickness
were used to measure and compare their modulus
Force Sensor
Spherical indenter
Sylgard sample
18
2.3 Analysis Methods
2.3.1 Compression Study Analysis
With the designed instrument setup, one can get the stress and strain of the sample using
equation [5]:
Stress σ = Fx*9.8/(π*(D/2)2)
Strain ε = dL/L0
where Fx is the force applied by UMT, which applies the force to the sample. D is the
diameter of the sample. dL is the change in the sample’s length under compressive force.
From the above equations, it is easy to see the slope of the stress-strain curve is the elastic
modulus of the sample. More details are shown in figure 7.
y = 2,111,988.25x + 4,881.03
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
Str
ess,
Pa
Strain
19
Figure 7. Plot of Stress (σ) vs. Strain (ε) for Compression study. The slope of the line
gives us the elastic modulus. Sylgard 184 sample with 10:1 ratio of base: curing
agent was used for this particular sample
2.3.2 Hertz Indentation Analysis
For Hertz Indentation, we use equation [6]:
P = 4/3 E*R1/2δ3/2
Where P = applied force
E* = effective Young’s modulus= E*= E/ (1-𝜈2), E= Young’s modulus of the soft material,
𝜈=Poisson’s ratio of the soft material
R = radius of the probe, δ = displacement (indentation depth)
An example of a plot of Force (P) vs. Displacement (δ) is shown in figure 8.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 0.00005 0.0001 0.00015 0.0002 0.00025 0.0003
Ap
plie
d f
orc
e P
(N
)
Displacement δ (m)
20
Figure 8. Plot of Force (P) vs. Displacement (δ) for Hertz indentation
By plotting P vs. δ, one can get the value of Effective Young’s modulus E*. For most soft
materials, the value of Poisson’s ratio 𝜈 is 0.499. Thus we can calculate Young’s modulus
of PDMS using equation 6 and equation 7
2.4 Results and discussion
2.4.1 Compression test
Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the results obtained for the modulus of PDMS experiment.
The modulus of PDMS is dependent on the ratio of mixing between the base and cross-
linker. For smaller ratios, the modulus of PDMS is high.
Table 1. Summary of compression study
Ratio Modulus
(MPa)
Error
(MPa)
7:1 3.09 0.1
10:1 2.4 0.2
12:1 1.88 0.1
15:1 1.2 0.07
20:1 0.89 0.04
25:1 0.39 0.04
21
2.4.2 Hertz Indentation
Table 1. Summary of Hertz Indentation study
Ratio Modulus
(MPa)
Error
(MPa)
7:1 2.01 0.05
10:1 1.77 0.06
12:1 1.35 0.07
15:1 1.05 0.1
20:1 0.59 0.05
25:1 0.41 0.003
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Mo
du
lus
(MP
a)
PDMS base/cross-linker ratio
Compression test
Figure 9 Plot of Modulus values using compression testing for various values of
PDMS base/curing agent ratios. The modulus value is high for smaller mixing
ration and decreases for higher base/curing agent ratios
22
2.4 Conclusions
Young’s modulus of PDMS samples was studied based on two types of macroscopic tests
viz Compression test and Hertz Indentation. Both the tests show that Young’s modulus of
PDMS is related to the degree of cross-linking, thus smaller mixing ratios of base/agent
show higher modulus values. The relationship between the PDMS network elastic modulus
and its base/cross-linker ratio are summarized in Figure 11. In order to compare our test
results with the work done by other groups, we have also plotted findings of a reference
article20
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Mod
ulu
s (M
pa)
PDMS base/cross-linker ratio
Hertz Indentation
Figure 10 Plot of Modulus values using Hertz Indentation for various values of
PDMS base/curing agent ratios. The modulus value is high for smaller mixing
ration and decreases for higher base/curing agent ratios
23
For smaller ratios of the base to cross-linker, the modulus values were found to be higher.
At such ratios, the degree of polymerization is higher, giving us a harder sample. For larger
ratios of the base to cross-linker, we get softer PDMS samples.
Figure 11. Summary of Modulus Experiments and reference values from the
literature18. It can be seen that the modulus values after using the Hertz correction
factor did not change drastically.
Both macroscopic tests showed similar trends, as described above. The modulus value was
observed to be dependent on the method used. This is consistent with the research done by
other groups.
3.59
2.91
2.61
1.21
0.98
0.56
1.871.68
0.86
0.6
0.36
3.09
2.4
1.88
1.2
0.89
0.39
2.01
1.77
1.35
1.05
0.590.41
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Mod
ulu
s M
Pa
)
PDMS base to cross-linker ratio
Compression Test
Hertz Indentation
reference
Hertz Correction Factor
24
CHAPTER 3. FRICTION AND WEAR
Friction is responsible for consuming about one-third of the world’s energy resources21. It
is the principal cause of wear and energy loss, and humans have been attempting to reduce
this energy loss for ages. Tribology is the science of lubrication, friction, and wear that
deals with a diverse array of natural and man-made systems of interacting bodies in relative
motion.
A process that involves friction always goes hand-in-hand with energy transformation.
Thus it is important to develop a thermodynamic framework for studying its characteristics.
The energy dissipation in friction processes is an irreversible phenomenon; thus, the
concept of the thermodynamic entropy production becomes an ideal tool for probing into
its complex behavior22.
When two bodies are pressed together and set in motion, it is always accompanied by the
dissipation or release of energy. The interfacial friction is the main factor that controls the
behavior of energy generation within the contact of a sliding system. The frictional energy
generated between contacting bodies is mainly governed by the velocity and combination
of the applied load. Other contacting factors, such as the relative velocity, material
properties, and size, also influence the dissipation and distribution of the frictional energy.
The friction and heat dissipation are, therefore, intimately related23.
26
scale. This roughness feature, known as asperities are present not just at macro-scale but
also down to nano-scale dimensions. As a result, a true solid to solid contact exists only at
a limited number of points, accounting for only a fraction of the apparent or nominal
contact area27. As higher force is applied, the true contact area rises due to the deformation
of the surface asperities. In order to quantify this linearity between the applied load, static
friction, and true contact area, Amonton-Coulomb’s law is used28. As mentioned in the
previous example, in order to move an object kept on a sloped surface, the static friction
force must be overcome by applying greater force. The maximum possible friction force
(Fmax) between two surfaces before sliding begins is defined as:
Fmax=µsFN [8]
It can be seen from the equation that Fmax is the product of the coefficient of static friction
(µs) and the normal force (FN):
When there is no sliding, the friction force can have any value from zero up to Fmax. If the
applied force is smaller than the force required to initiate sliding one surface over the other,
this force is opposed by a frictional force of equal magnitude and opposite direction. A
force greater than Fmax will cause sliding to occur. As soon as sliding begins, the static
friction is no longer applicable, and this type of friction between the two surfaces is called
kinetic friction.
A classic example of static friction, contrary to popular belief, is the force that prevents a
car wheel from sliding as it rolls on the ground. Although the wheel is in motion, the contact
area of the tire in contact with the ground is stationary relative to the ground.
28
All real fluids (except superfluids) offer some resistance to shearing and therefore are
viscous. For teaching and explanatory purposes, it is helpful to use the concept of an
inviscid fluid or an ideal fluid that offers no resistance to shearing, and so is not viscous.
3.1.4 Rolling friction
The force resisting the motion when a circular or spherical body (such as a ball, tire,
or wheel) is called Rolling resistance, sometimes called Rolling Friction or Rolling Drag.
It is mainly caused by non-elastic effects; that is, not all the energy needed for deformation
(or movement) of the wheel, roadbed, etc. is recovered when the pressure is removed. Two
forms of this are hysteresis losses (see below), and permanent (plastic) deformation of the
object or the surface (e.g., soil). Another cause of rolling resistance lies in
the slippage between the wheel and the surface, which dissipates energy. Note that only
the last of these effects involves friction; therefore, the name "rolling friction" is, to an
extent, a misnomer.
In analogy with sliding friction, rolling resistance is often expressed as a coefficient times
the normal force. This coefficient of rolling resistance is generally much smaller than the
coefficient of sliding friction.
Any coasting wheeled vehicle will gradually slow down due to rolling resistance, including
that of the bearings, but a train car with steel wheels running on steel rails will roll farther
than a bus of the same mass with rubber tires running on tarmac. Factors that contribute to
rolling resistance are the (amount of) deformation of the wheels, the deformation of the
roadbed surface, and movement below the surface. Additional contributing factors
include wheel diameter, speed, load on wheel, surface adhesion, sliding, and relative
micro-sliding between the surfaces of contact. The losses due to hysteresis also depend
29
strongly on the material properties of the wheel or tire and the surface. For example,
a rubber tire will have a higher rolling resistance on a paved road than a steel railroad
wheel on a steel rail. Also, sand on the ground will give more rolling resistance
than concrete.
Figure 13. Hard wheel rolling on and deforming a soft surface, resulting in the
reaction force R from the surface having a component that opposes the motion. (W is
some vertical load on the axle, F is some towing force applied to the axle, r is the wheel
radius, and both frictions with the ground and friction at the axle are assumed to be
negligible and so are not shown. The wheel is rolling to the left at a constant speed.)
Note that R is the resultant force from non-uniform pressure at the wheel-roadbed
contact surface. This pressure is greater towards the front of the wheel due to
hysteresis.
30
3.2 Lubrication and Wear
Dr. H. Peter Jost coined the term “tribology” in the mid 1960s, and the term was accepted
as the study of friction, lubrication and wear, and their application. Even though the effects
of friction were studied by Leonardo da Vinci in the 1400s, it took nearly 600 more years
to quantify and study friction as a branch of science. There was a dramatic increase in the
reported failures of plant and machinery in the early 1960s. Most of these were due to wear
in moving parts of the machine and caused serious financial losses. Many industrial
operations required continuous operations of the machinery, and such breakdowns were
costlier than ever.
To overcome such failures, specialists involved in wear, lubrication, and friction fields
conducted several studies and reported on the impact of friction, lubrication, and wear on
machine efficiency, cost, and productivity. As a result, tribology became a mainstream
field of science, and many universities offer it as part of their mechanical engineering
department curriculum.
The primary focus of tribology was to improve the efficiency of industrial operations and
extending the lifecycle of industrial machinery. Today, those principles and design benefits
have evolved in their own branch of study and are making a major impact in a variety of
modern applications. Here are some examples.
3.2.1 Biotribology
The term “biotribology” was first reported by Dowson in 1970 as “those aspects of
tribology concerned with biological systems”32. This type of tribological system involves
an extensive range of synthetic materials and natural tissues like skin, cartilage, blood
vessels, heart, tendons and ligaments.
31
These materials involve complex interactions between biological components. In order to
study these systems, biotribologists incorporate concepts of lubrication, friction, and wear,
of these biological surfaces in various applications, such as the wear of screws and plates
in bone fracture repair, the design of joints and prosthetic devices, wear of replacement
heart valves, wear of denture and restorative materials, and even the tribology of contact
lenses.
3.2.2 Green Tribology
The concept of green tribology is relatively new can be defined as “The science and
technology of the tribological aspects of ecological balance and of environmental and
biological impacts.”33 A simple definition of green tribology is saving materials, energy,
improving the environment and the quality of life. The area of green tribology directly
affects the economy as it helps reduce the waste and extend the life of industrial
equipments. The specific field of green or environment-friendly tribology emphasizes the
aspects of interacting surfaces in relative motion, which are of importance for energy or
environmental sustainability or which have impact upon today’s environment.
3.2.3 Nanotribology
This branch of tribology studies and characterizes friction, adhesion and surface interaction
at the nano scale. As it is done at molecular level, atomic interactions and quantum effects
are not negligible and have to be taken into consideration. The systems such as MEMS
(Microelectrochemical Systems) and NEMS systems (nanoelectromechanical systems)
have been on the rise since 1990s. They can be simply described as miniature machines
that has both mechanical as well as electronic components. Such systems include disk
drives, inkjet printers, biodetectors, molecular sieves etc. In order to change surface
32
topography at such small scale, the surface interaction at nano and micro-scale has to be
studied and nanotribology allows us to do so.
33
CHAPTER 4 CARBON AND ITS FORMS
Elemental Carbon exists in two natural allotropes, diamond, and graphite. These two
allotropes consist of extended networks of sp3- and sp2 -hybridized carbon atoms,
respectively34. Both forms show unique physical properties such as hardness, thermal
conductivity, lubrication behavior, or electrical conductivity35. Theoretically, there are
many ways to construct carbon allotropes by altering the periodic binding motif in
networks consisting of sp3-, sp2- and sp-hybridized carbon atoms36. As a consequence of
the expected remarkable physical properties of these elusive carbon allotropes, it has been
appealing to develop concepts for their preparation on a macro-scale. Diamond and
graphite used to be the only known allotropes of carbon for a long time. This situation
changed in 1985, with the advent of fullerenes, which were observed for the first time by
Kroto et al37. This serendipitous discovery marked the beginning of an era of synthetic
carbon allotropes. Now, as we celebrate buckminsterfullerene’s 25th birthday, it is also the
time to reflect on a growing family of synthetic carbon allotropes, which includes the
synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes in 199138 and the rediscovery of graphene in 200439.
Keeping in mind the numerous possible carbon modifications and the number of scientists
investigating this challenge, these revelations have certainly not come to an end.
4.1 Nanotubes:
Carbon nanotubes are one of the allotropes of carbon which are intermediate to spherical
fullerenes and flat graphene sheets. There are two main types of carbon nanotubes, viz
Single-walled nanotubes (SWNT) and multi-walled nanotubes (MWNT), that can have
high structural perfection. SWNTs consist of a single graphite sheet seamlessly wrapped
34
into a cylindrical tube40. MWNTs comprise of an array of such nanotubes that are
concentrically nested like rings of a tree trunk41.
Figure 14. Single Walled and Multi Walled Carbon Nanotubes42. Single walled CNT
have 1 Graphene cylinder whereas Multi Walled CNT have multiple graphene
cylinders
Despite structural similarity to a single sheet of graphite, which is a semiconductor with
zero band gap, SWNTs can either be metallic or semiconducting, depending on the sheet
direction about which the graphite sheet is rolled to form a nanotube cylinder43. The
nanotube axis direction relative to graphene is denoted by a pair of integers (n, m).
Depending on the orientation of carbon bonds around the nanotube diameter, the nanotube
is either of the armchair (n = m), zigzag (n = 0 or m = 0), or chiral (any other n and m)
variety. All armchair SWNTs are conductors like metals. Those with n - m = 3k, (where k
is a nonzero integer) have a tiny band gap and are semiconductors.
Small-diameter SWNTs are exceptionally strong, meaning that they have a high Young's
modulus and high tensile strength. Literature reports of these mechanical parameters can
35
be confusing, because some authors use the total occupied cross-sectional area and others
use the much smaller van der Waals area for defining Young's modulus and tensile strength.
With the total area per nanotube in a nanotube bundle for normalizing the applied force to
obtain the applied stress, the calculated Young's modulus for an individual (10, 10)
nanotube is ~0.64 TPa44, which is consistent with measurements. Because small-diameter
nanotube ropes have been extended elastically by ~5.8% before breaking, the SWNT
strength calculated from the product of this strain and modulus is ~37 GPa, which is close
to the maximum strength of silicon carbide nanorods (~53 GPa45). This modulus of ~0.64
TPa is about the same as that of silicon carbide nanofibers (~0.66 TPa) but lower than that
of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (~1.06 TPa)44. More impressive and important for
applications needing light structural materials, the density-normalized modulus and
strength of this typical SWNT are, respectively, ~2.4 and ~1.7 times that of silicon carbide
nanorods and ~19 and ~56 times that of steel wire. The challenge is to achieve these
properties of individual SWNTs in nanotube assemblies found in sheets and continuous
fibers.
4.2 Carbon Nano onions
Carbon Nano-Onions or CNOs are multi-shell fullerenes consisting of quasi-spherical
nested graphitic layers with a size ranging from 2 to 50 nm, depending upon the method of
synthesis; the innermost shell is composed of a C60 fullerene and the adjacent shells are
approximately spaced by 3.4 Å, slightly different to the distance between two [2 2 0] planes
(3.334 Å) in bulk graphite46. Firstly reported by Iijima in 198047, CNOs aroused great
interest in 1992 thanks to Ugarte’s experiment48. Under an intense electron beam, he
36
observed the in situ transformation of amorphous carbon into spherical particles, with a
diameter of about 45 nm, due to the highly energetic irradiation process, which induced the
graphitization and the curling of the amorphous carbon49.
Although various methods have been published for the synthesis of CNOs, the main
synthetic methods have been thermal annealing of ultradispersed nanodiamonds50 (NDs),
arc-discharge between two electrodes submerged in water51, pyrolysis, ion implantation52,
chemical vapor deposition53, or electron-beam irradiation54. Depending on the preparation
method of the onion-like structures, different types of nanostructures can be achieved with
varying sizes (‘‘big” and ‘‘small”), shapes (spherical and polyhedral), and types of cores
(dense and hollow
Figure 15. HRTEM image of Carbon Nano-onions (left) and schematic of Carbon
nano-onions formed by 3 concentric layers (C60, C240, C540) 55
4.3 Fullerenes
A fullerene is a carbon allotrope which consists of carbon atoms connected by single or
double bonds to form a closed mesh. Fullerenes have rings of five or seven carbon atoms
37
fused together to form spheres, ellipsoid, tube and many other shapes. The most abundant
and stable form of fullerenes is Buckminster fullerene (C60) with 60 carbon atoms arranged
in a spherical structure56. It contains 12 pentagons and 20 hexagons and its shape resembles
that of a soccer ball, which contains57. Fullerenes fulfill the EULER’s theorem which states
that in order to form a polyhedron from building a closed structure from pentagons and
hexagons; it has to contain exact 12 pentagons. Following this rule, the smallest stable
fullerene is C60, which has no two pentagons side by side, making it the most stable
structure.
Figure 16. Varieties of fullerenes found in natural shungite with different numbers of
carbon atoms: C24, C28, C32, C36, C50, C60, C7058
C60 molecule also known as Buckminsterfullerene is highly symmetrical59. There are 120
symmetrical operations, like rotation around the axis and reflection in a plane, which map
the molecule onto itself. This makes C60 the most symmetrical molecule. There are two
38
types of bond lengths in the fullerene: C5-C5 single bonds in the pentagons and C5-
C6 double bonds in the hexagons; the first is 1.45±0.015 Å and the other one is 1.40±0.015
Å60. Each carbon atom forms bond to three other adjacent atoms with sp hybridization. The
set of orbitals is arranged at 120-degrees angles and is centred in the xy-plane61. Hence
these delocalized pi electrons stabilize the spheroid structure by resonance.
A C60 molecule is about 7 Å in diameter62. C60 molecules condense to form a solid of
weakly bound molecules. This crystalline state is called fullerites. This solid is cubic,
weakly bound with a lattice constant a=14.71 Å and electrically insulating. It occurs as
yellow powder, which turns pink when dissolved in toluene. On exposure to strong UV
light, the Buckyballs polymerize, forming bonds between adjacent balls. In the
polymerized state, C60 no longer dissolves in toluene. NMR studies of C60 benzene solvates
show free rotation at room temperature. At about -13°, the balls spin freely in their
crystalline positions. At lower temperature, their movements begin to limit to certain
orientations. Eventually, below -183°, the balls become completely struck. Chemically the
molecule is quite stable; breaking the balls requires temperature of over 1000°. By heating
fullerenes up to 1500° in absence of air, they transform to graphite.
4.4 Nanofibres
Carbon nanofibre are a unique form of vapour-grown carbon fibre that bridge the gap
between the larger, conventional PAN or pitch-based carbon fibres and the smaller single-
wall or multi-wall carbon nanotubes63. The nanofibres have transport and mechanical
properties that approach the theoretical values of single crystal graphite, similar to the
nanotubes, but can be produced in high volume at low cost. Investigations performed over
39
last thirty years mainly devoted to the understanding the growth mechanism and property
development from various similar gas phase techniques. Figure 15 shows the typical SEM
image of as grown carbon nanofibres.
Figure 17. SEM image of Carbon Nano-Fibres64
Vapour phase produced carbon nanofibres are similar to fullerene nanotubes in the
nanoscale domain of initial formation and highly graphitic structure of the initial filament.
A variation makes carbon nanofibres of the vapour-phase catalytic method in which a
carbon containing feedstock is pyrolysed in the presence of small metal catalyst particles65.
The nanofibre growth normally proceeds in a two-stage process of lengthening followed
by thickening. In the first stage, carbon from the hot atmosphere is absorbed into the
catalyst particle and then precipitates out on one side to form a highly graphitic strand with
a diameter roughly equal to that of the catalyst particle. After lengthening, chemical vapour
deposition of carbon covers the catalyst and builds up the diameter of the nanofibre.
40
4.5 Carbon spheres
Spherically shaped carbon materials have been given many names. These include carbon
balls, carbon nanospheres, carbon microbeads, carbon blacks, onions, mesoporous
microbeads, etc. While the properties/sizes/morphology of the spheres can certainly vary
there appears to be no consistent nomenclature for naming these shaped materials;
consequently in this review we will use the generic term carbon spheres (CSs) to cover all
carbons that have a spherical or near spherical shape. This will not include the fullerene
family of carbons. The spherical shape is not peculiar to carbon; indeed numerous studies
of spherical silica have indicated the wide range of synthetic strategies and approaches that
can be used to make spherical materials. A key target when making spherical materials is
to ensure that they are monodisperse and that the size (diameter) and the chemical
properties of the external rim can be controlled. Many CSs have been shown to be made of
layers of carbon that typically form broken concentric layers emanating from the core. CSs
are attracted to each other by van der Waals forces and this leads to agglomerated
collections of CSs. When CSs have diameters of less than 1000 nm they also tend to
accrete, i.e. bond together to form necklace or bead like structures. Thus, although CSs are
normally discussed as though they are discrete, they often form connected solid extended
chains. These chains are formed early in the synthesis process and are not necessarily due
to post synthesis treatments. Mechanisms that have been proposed to explain their
formation are described in this review. Spheres can also be built up from carbon layers that
are perpendicular to the sphere rim.
41
Figure 18. Carbon Spheres66
The study of CSs can be categorized in four different ways. Firstly, spheres can be
described as solid, core–shell or hollow. Secondly, they can be classified according to their
‘nanometric texture’, i.e. in terms of whether the spheres are made of concentric, radial or
random layers . Thirdly, it has also been proposed that spheres can be categorized in terms
of their size, in particular their diameter. In this method three categories are recognized (i)
well graphitized spheres (2–20 nm), (ii) less graphitized spheres (50–1000 nm) and carbon
beads (>1000 nm). Fourthly, it is possible to classify spheres in terms of strategies used in
their synthesis. It appears that the procedures used to make spherical carbon materials such
as chemical vapor deposition (CVD), arcdischarge, laser ablation, autoclave processes, etc.
can produce quite different materials.
42
CHAPTER 5 STIMULI RESPONSIVE POLYMERS
The functions of living cells are regulated by macromolecules that respond to changes in
local environment and these biopolymers form the basis around which all major natural
processes are controlled. Many synthetic polymers that exhibit environmentally responsive
behavior can thus be considered as biomimetic and their development is central to
emerging ‘smart’ applications in biology and medicine. Of especial interest are synthetic
or modified biological materials that can undergo conformational or phase changes in
response to variations in temperature and/or pH. Polymers of this type are being developed
for uses in fields as diverse as bulk engineering and microscale medicine, while specific
examples range from microfluidic devices, pulsatile drug release systems, bioadhesion
mediators and motors/actuators. Responsive polymers are also a major focus in emerging
nanoscale technologies. In all these cases the key parameter defining the responsive or
‘smart’ behavior of the polymers is a non-linear response to an external signal. Although
there are many responsive elements that can be incorporated in synthetic materials or
engineered/modified biopolymers, much of the research to date has involved pH,
temperature or light as the stimulus. As in nature, the bulk response of the polymer is
usually due to multiple co-operative interactions such as progressive ionization or loss of
H-bonding, that, although individually small, ultimately evoke a large structural change in
the material when summed over the whole polymer. This behavior intrinsically lends itself
to biomedical applications and in this review the aim is to highlight selected yet diverse
recent research showing the potential for bringing these classes of materials into
therapeutic use.
43
5.1 Temperature Responsiveness
Figure 17 illustrates several examples of temperature-responsive monomeric blocks which,
upon polymerization maintain stimuli-responsiveness. A well known polymer with the
LCST behavior is poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) which exhibits coil-to-
globule phase transition at 32 ◦C. Poly(N-vinylcaprolactone) (PVCL), poly(N-(dl)-(1-
hydroxymethyl) propylmethacrylamide) (p(dl)-HMPMA), and poly(N,N -
diethylacrylamide) (PDEAAm) are also temperature-responsive, and their LCSTs are
about 32, 37, 33 ◦C, respectively. Thus, molecular designs of a polymer backbone allow
one to control temperature at which a given system is responsive. It is well established that
the LCST phase transition is a nanometer scale event, where the particle or aggregate
dimensions change. However, for individual polymer chains, the coil-to globule transitions
can be thermodynamically controlled by adjusting polymer compositions, as determined
by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).
Figure 19. Temperature Responsive Polymers67
When copolymerized with hydrophilic or hydrophobic comonomers, LCST transitions
may shift to higher or lower temperatures, respectively. Block copolymers of poly(ethylene
44
oxide)–poly(propylene oxide) (PEO–PPO) also exhibit thermal responses in solutions, but
it is believed that the driving forces for these transitions originate from amphiphilic balance
5.2 pH responsiveness
Figure 18 illustrates examples of pH-responsive polymers. pH-responsive polymer
solutions represent another group, in which chemical structures of pH-responsive
compounds have ionizable functional groups capable of donating or accepting protons
upon environmental pH changes. In this case, electrostatic repulsions between generated
charges cause alternations of the hydrophobic volume along a polymer chain, which is
capable of extending or collapsing. Polyacids, such as poly(acrylic acid) (PAAc), and
poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAAc) with pKa values in the range of 5 will release protons
and swell under basic pH values.
Figure 20. pH Responsive Polymers65
In contrast, pH-responsive polybases accept protons and extend under acidic pH
conditions, where amino and amine functional groups in poly(N,N -dimethyl aminoethyl
methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) and poly(vinyl pyridine) (PVP), respectively, are responsible
for these transitions. One of the common trends in designing stimuli-responsive polymers
45
is to copolymerize monomers with different stimuli-responsiveness in order to achieve
multiple-responsive behavior.
5.3 Electromagnetic responsiveness
Incorporation of photo-chromic molecules provides opportunity to develop polymers
capable of responding to electromagnetic radiation. Figure 19 illustrates most common
photo-sensitive molecules, which are classified into the following categories: cis–trans
isomers (A), ionization monomers (B), and dimerization monomers (C). As shown in
Figure 19A, photo-responsive azobenzene is a molecule that exhibits trans-to-cis
photoisomerization with sufficiently low energy (2–3 kcal/mol) to induce photo-chromic
transitions. The rearrangement mechanism for lecuo and spiropyran derivatives shown in
Figure 19B is based on ionization upon exposure to electro-magnetic irradiation. When
exposed to UV light, dissociated ion pairs are generated, which can be further neutralized
when heated in the dark. As illustrated in Figure 19B, photo-induced polymer chains of
lecuo and spiropyran derivatives shrink and expand, which is attributed to the reversible
exchange of the electrostatic repulsion between ionic states. This process typically requires
less than 5 kcal/mol. Figure 19C illustrates another photoreactive molecule cinnamate
which is able to dimerize upon UV irradiation with the energy barrier of about 7 kcal/mol.
These molecular entities can be utilized as photo-reversible covalently crosslinkers in
polymers, thus offering potential applications as switching segments in shape memory
systems and other devices. Liquid crystalline materials are stimuli-responsive polymers
that have been known for a few decades. These are molecules with permanent dipole
moments embedded in polymer matrices, which due to optical and geometrical anisotropies
are able to respond to electromagnetic field by aligning their mean optic axis parallel to the
46
external field, which results in orientation changes. As shown in Figure 19A, liquid
crystalline molecules are freely dispersed between the two electrodes with no electric field.
When an electric field is applied, the molecules align along the electric field axis and the
driving force for the alignment results from the electrostatic interactions. Figure 19B
summarizes selected examples of chemical entities capable of responsiveness, and their
common feature is the permanent dipole moment, in this case generated by electron-
withdrawing groups nitrile (CN) and trifluoromethyl (CF3) groups.
Figure 21. Electromagnetic Responsive Polymers65
47
CHAPTER 6. TUNABLE FRICTION THROUGH STIMULI
RESPONSIVE HYBRID CARBON MICROSPHERES
Friction can be greatly reduced by introducing a rolling element between two sliding
surfaces68. Braun et al.69 showed that friction can be lowered 102−103 times compared to
sliding friction. Despite the superiority of rolling friction over sliding70, few attempts have
been made to study the rolling friction mechanism on the micro- and nanoscale. Past studies
have explored the use of fullerenes (buckyballs or C60) as an additive to synthetic oil71. The
fullerene molecules were expected to impart a rolling mechanism to reduce friction. The
small sizes of the fullerenes were found to hamper the predicted “rolling mechanism”, and
they were proven to be detrimental to the surfaces in contact by getting trapped in the
surface asperities. St. Dennis et al.72 showed that an aqueous suspension of carbon
microspheres (CM), which are larger in size compared to fullerenes, can be used to reduce
friction. These uniform CM (∼400 nm) can withstand high pressure (8 GPa) and have
diameters greater than the inherent surface roughness of a wide range of polished materials.
The CM work as small ball bearings and employ a rolling mechanism to reduce friction.
Furthermore, the surfaces in contact showed high durability and no visible surface wear.
In a follow-up study, Cheng et al.73 explored the influence of the size and concentration of
the CM on rolling friction. The coefficient of friction was found to increase with increasing
particle size, and for a given size, an optimal concentration of ∼4 mg/mL resulted in low
friction for prolonged shear cycles. Hybrid carbon/iron microspheres74 were also
demonstrated to be effective in the presence of a magnetic field that localized the particles
in the shear contact region. Several groups explored the use of nanometer-sized materials
other than carbon allotropes to reduce friction. Rod-shaped materials such as carbon
48
nanotubes75, ZnS76 were shown to reduce friction with no apparent wear. The properties of
particles at surfaces can be altered or enhanced by the grafting of polymers77. Stimuli
sensitive polymers are of particular interest as they impart new properties upon activation
of a trigger78. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) also known as PNIPAm is a temperature-
sensitive polymer widely used in drug delivery, biosensor design, and tissue engineering
for its stimuli-responsive property79. The polymer chains are well hydrated and form a
three-dimensional hydrogel network when present at temperatures below its lower critical
solution temperature (LCST) at 32 °C80. When heated above its LCST, the polymer chains
undergo a phase transition and lose their water molecules81. This dehydrates the chains and
shrinks the hydrogel structure82.
In this work, we show that PNIPAm-grafted CM show increased friction upon heating the
particles above the LCST. We also demonstrate that the low friction at room temperature
is concentration-dependent, and a relatively high particle concentration is needed to reduce
friction significantly. We hypothesize that upon increasing the temperature above LCST of
PNIPAm, the polymer chains dehydrate, rendering the PNIPAm-grafted CM surface to a
hydrophobic state. The latter causes the particles to aggregate and form clusters that
hamper the rolling ability of individual dispersed particles, resulting in high friction force
values as shown schematically in Figure 22.
49
Figure 22. Schematic illustration of the rolling mechanism of grafted CM
confined between two surfaces. Aggregation of the grafted CM at high
temperatures leads to increased friction.
6.1 Experimental Section
6.1.1 Carbon Microsphere (CM) Synthesis.
D-(+)-Glucose (Sigma Aldrich, Bio Reagent G7021) was dissolved in deionized (DI) water
(Millipore Direct-Q) to obtain a 0.5 M aqueous solution which served as the precursor to
synthesize the CM. The solution was stirred and sonicated to ensure complete dissolution
of the glucose. Once all the glucose was dissolved, the solution was transferred to a glass
vial and placed inside a stainless-steel pressure vessel. The latter was heated in an oven set
at 185 °C and heated for 4.5 h. The resulting black precipitate that formed in the solution
after the hydrothermal step was collected and sequentially washed with acetone and ethanol
with the help of a centrifuge. Samples were washed until the supernatant was clear. The
precipitate was then dried at 80 °C for 6 h in an oven under atmosphere. The dried
precipitate was then placed in a tube furnace and pyrolyzed at 800 °C for 10 h under an
inert argon atmosphere. All glassware and vials were cleaned by immersion in concentrated
sulfuric acid for 24 h followed by thorough rinsing in DI water.
6.1.2 Grafting of Carbon Microspheres with PNIPAm.
To functionalize the CM, an atomic transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) surface
“grafting from” process was used. For this purpose, first the CM surface was functionalized
with an initiator, 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide (BiBB), in a series of steps. In the first step,
3.0 g of CM were dispersed in 70% HNO3 (150 mL) and refluxed at 120 °C for 2 h to
50
introduce −COOH surface groups (denoted as CM-COOH). The CM-COOH particles were
then washed with water until a neutral pH was measured followed by drying in an oven. In
the second step, the CM-COOH particles were dispersed in thionyl chloride with the
concentration of 50 g/L and refluxed at 80 °C for 24 h. The liquid phase was evaporated
by a rotary evaporator. The solid was washed with tetrahydrofuran and dried at 100 °C for
2 h. The product is denoted as CM-COCl. After this step, 3.0 g CM-COCl was refluxed
with short chain dialcohol (ethylene glycol, 150 mL) at 120 °C for 48 h to introduce −OH
end groups, denoted as CM-OH. Lastly, esterification was carried out by reacting CM-OH
(2.0 g) with BiBB (16 g) to produce the initiator functional group for ATRP (CM-Br) (see
Figure 23).
51
Figure 23. Schematic illustration of the grafting process. (a, b) Macroinitiator
preparation, (c) polymerization of PNIPAm from the surface of the carbon
microsphere (CM).
52
PNIPAm was polymerized using the macro initiator (CM-Br, 2.0 g) in the presence of the
CuBr/PMDETA metal ligand system in 50 mL of DMF medium for 18 h. The reaction
conditions of CM-Br/NIPAm ratio was 1:6 (w/w), and NIPAM/CuBr/PMDETA ratio was
25:1:1 in moles. At the end of the reaction time, the mixture was transferred into excess
methanol and cleaned by centrifugation several times at 25000 rpm until the supernatant
became colorless. All the drying processes were performed under a vacuum using a freeze-
dryer (Christ Alpha 1-2 LD plus). Before drying under a vacuum, the sample was kept in
a deep freezer for 2 h. After each modification step, particles were separated and cleaned
using a centrifuge (Beckman Coulter Avanti J-25 I). The average sizes and corresponding
standard deviations of the bare and PNIPAm-grafted particles were measured by averaging
∼120 individual particles from SEM images (Figure 24 A, B).
53
Figure 24. SEM images of (A) bare carbon microspheres after pyrolysis, (B)
PNIPAm-grafted carbon microspheres. The scale bars are 500 and 300 nm for the
low and high magnification images, respectively
6.1.3 Friction Measurements.
A borosilicate lens (Anchor Optics, Barrington, NJ) with a radius of curvature of 7.75 mm
was used as the probe (or top shearing surface). A silicon wafer (University wafer, rms =
1.72 nm) was used as the bottom shearing surface. Both surfaces were sonicated in ethanol
and water, respectively, to remove any debris and/or organic contamination. The
borosilicate lens probe was also cleaned with an air plasma for 1 min. A universal material
54
tester (CETR nanotribometer, Campbell, CA) was used to measure friction forces between
the shearing surfaces with or without PNIPAm-grafted CM. An FL sensor (force range
5−50 g) was used with a spring attachment (spring constant = 520 N/m). The instrument
was programmed such that upon contact with the substrate, the borosilicate lens moves 10
mm to the right relative to the motionless bottom silicon surface at a speed of 0.5 mm/s
followed by moving back to its original position while maintaining a constant applied load.
The feedback mechanism in the instrument maintains the applied load while the force
sensor measures the resultant friction force (Fx) for a particular applied force (L). In a
typical experiment, a 40 μL drop of the sample (for e.g., aqueous PNIPAm-grafted CM)
was placed on the silicon wafer. The probe was then brought in contact with the drop, at
which point a wetting meniscus formed which ensured that the lubricant medium remained
present during the shearing motion. The system was allowed to equilibrate for 1 min prior
to the start of each experiment. The applied force (L) was varied from 5 g (49 mN) to 30 g
(294 mN), with increments of 5 g (49 mN), and the resultant friction force (Fx) was
measured for each of the predetermined applied loads. The reported friction force values
were obtained by averaging the friction forces in both directions, and each experiment was
run at least 5 times to calculate standard deviations. Various concentrations (1, 3, 5, and 10
mg/mL) of aqueous PNIPAm-grafted CM were prepared to test the effect of concentration
on the coefficient of friction (CoF). The resulting pH value of the aqueous solutions was
5.5. To perform the experiment at elevated temperatures, a hot plate was placed directly
underneath the silicon substrate. The hot plate was set at 45 °C, and the surface temperature
was measured at 40 °C using an infrared laser thermometer. Upon dispensing a drop of the
aqueous PNIPAm-grafted CM, the system was again allowed to equilibrate for 1 min and
55
the experiment was performed similarly as described earlier. The duration of each run was
approximately 4 min, during which no significant evaporation of the lubricant drop was
observed.
6.2 Results and Discussion
Figure 24 shows SEM images of the CM before and after grafting with PNIPAm. The CM
were produced using the method described by Wang et al.83 After the hydrothermal step,
the microspheres still have functional groups present84. However, the pyrolysis step
removes any functionality on the surface and renders them hydrophobic85. As seen in
Figure 24 A, the particles exist as singlets, which is essential so as to allow the particles to
roll as individual entities, thereby reducing friction.5 Figure 24 B shows SEM images of
PNIPAm-grafted CM. The grafting of PNIPAm onto the CM was achieved without
damaging, without causing aggregation or clustering of the individual particles. SEM
imaging was used to measure the particle sizes of the bare (240 ± 30 nm) and PNIPAm-
grafted CM (220 ± 43 nm). On the basis of these measurements, we cannot determine an
absolute thickness of the PNIPAm coating; however, we can estimate the thickness to be
on the order of 10s of nanometers or less. DLS measurements could not be performed
reliably or reproducibly on the bare carbon particles because of their aggregation behavior
as a result of being inherently hydrophobic.
56
Figure 25. DLS measurements of average particle size of PNIPAm-grafted CM
dispersed in deionized water within a temperature range from 25 to 50 °C. The
concentration of particles is 0.1 mg/ml. Each data point is an average of 6 individual
measurements along with their corresponding standard deviations
The average diameter of the PNIPAm-grafted CM obtained from DLS measurements did
not show a reliable change in particle size because of the relatively large standard deviation
of the data (see Figure 25) presumably because of multiple scattering and particle settling
effects. Nevertheless, the PNIPAm coating imparts hydrophilicity to the surface to the
particles68 and results in a ζ potential of −23 mV which allows the PNIPAm-grafted CM to
easily disperse in DI water without the aid of a surfactant. In addition, TGA and FTIR
measurements were also performed on the microspheres to further confirm the surface
modification (see Figures 26 and 27).
57
Figure 26. Thermogravimetry (TG) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) data.
Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) of CM and PNIPAm-grafted CM were carried
out by using a thermogravimetric analyzer (Seiko, SII EXSTAR6000) under dry air
at a flow rate of 150 ml/min and a heating rate of 15 °C/min. Approximately 4 mg of
the sample was placed in ceramic crucibles, and the weight loss was recorded over the
temperature range 50-900 °C
58
Figure 27. FTIR spectra of CM and PNIPAm-grafted CM
Figure 28 shows the friction forces as a function of applied load between a borosilicate lens
and a smooth silicon wafer in the presence of an aqueous solution containing PNIPAm
grafted CM at various concentrations.
59
Figure 28. Plot of friction force versus applied load between a shearing borosilicate
spherical lens and a flat silicon wafer using an aqueous solution containing PNIPAm-
grafted CM at (A) 1 mg/mL, (B) 3 mg/mL, (C) 5 mg/mL, and (D) 10 mg/mL
concentrations. Data points marked by open circles (○) and filled circles (●)
correspond to measurements at 22 and 40 °C, respectively. Data points were fitted to
a straight line with the slope corresponding to the coefficient of friction (CoF). The
shear velocity is 0.5 mm/s over a distance of 10 mm. Error bars represent the standard
deviation of friction force obtained from at least 5 trials.
For each concentration, the friction experiment was performed at room temperature (i.e.,
22 °C) and repeated at a higher temperature (i.e., 40 °C). A similar trend was found in all
cases: the CoF is higher for high-temperature measurements compared to the room
temperature measurements. In the case of the aqueous lubricant having a CM concentration
of 1 mg/mL, a CoF of 0.37 was obtained at room temperature. The same experiment
60
performed at the higher temperature yielded a CoF of 0.47, which is even higher compared
to the CoF between the shearing surfaces in the absence of CM (i.e., pure water, CoF = 0.4;
see Figure S4). We can infer from these results that at a concentration of 1 mg/mL, the
PNIPAm-grafted CM aqueous lubricant only slightly reduces friction at room temperature
but is ineffective at the higher temperature. The fact that the CoF is even higher compared
to using pure DI water suggests that the particles add an additional contribution to the
friction force. Increasing the CM concentration in the aqueous lubricant to 3 mg/mL
improves the lubricity for both low and high temperature measurements. The CoF drops
even more as the concentration of the CM is increased to 5 mg/mL yielding a CoF of 0.04
at room temperature. Increasing the CM concentration beyond 5 mg/mL does not further
decrease the CoF at room temperature. The CoF values were obtained by fitting the data to
a modified version of Amontons’ equation 86
Fx= µ(L + L0 ) = µL + F0 [9]
where Lo is a constant “internal load” that is added to the external applied load L to account
for the new interactions generated as a result of having particles within the confined region
of the shearing surfaces. A positive value of Fo implies the presence of an internal attractive
force between the shearing surfaces while a negative value of Fo implies the presence of a
repulsive internal force between the shearing surfaces. In a control experiment (i.e., pure
DI water (Figure 29)), a fit of the data to equation 9 yielded a negative value for the y-axis
intercept suggesting the presence of a repulsive force-distance function between the
borosilicate lens and a silicon wafer in an aqueous environment.
61
Figure 29. Plot of friction force versus applied load between a shearing borosilicate
spherical lens and a flat silicon wafer using DI water only at room temperature. Data
points were fitted to a straight line with the slope corresponding to the coefficient of
friction (CoF). The shear velocity is 0.5 mm/s over a distance of 10 mm. Error bars
represent the standard deviation of friction force obtaining from at least 5 trials.
To test the efficacy of grafted CM to reduce friction, another control experiment was
performed (Figure 30), in which bare CM (not grafted) were sheared under the following
conditions: a) In DI water b) In presence of 0.36 SDS (sodium dodecylsulfate)
A 10 mg/mL suspension of bare CM showed high friction (CoF=0.26) under aqueous
condition. Carbon Microspheres are inherently hydrophobic and tend to aggregate in DI
water to form clusters. This was evident by the immediate settling of particles after
sonication. As a result, the particles can not contribute to rolling and the friction force is
high. In order to disperse the particles under aqueous condition, a 0.36 M solution of
Sodium dodecylsulfate was made and bare Carbon Microspheres were dispersed in 10
62
mg/mL concentration. The CoF of bare CM in presence of SDS was 0.05. Due to the
presence of SDS, the particles were well dispersed and did not settle immidiently. This
allows the particle to roll effectively in the contact region and thus reducing friction. In our
project, grafting PNIPAm on Carbon Microspheres allows the particles to disperse readily
in water, without a need of a surfactant
Figure 30. Plot of Friction force Fx vs. Applied load L while shearing a spherical probe
on Silicon wafer in presence of: a)10 mg/mL of bare Carbon Microspheres (CM) in
DI water b)Bare CM in presence of 0.36M SDS
The addition of particles at low concentrations (i.e., 1 and 3 mg/mL) reduces the repulsive
interaction. Further increase in the particle concentration (i.e., 5 and 10 mg/mL) entirely
overcomes the repulsive interaction at low loads, and instead, an adhesive interaction is
measured: the y-intercept of fitted data to equation 9 in Figure 28 C,D is positive. These
results further indicate that a critical concentration of PNIPAm-grafted CM (in the range
of 3 to 5 mg/mL) is needed for the aqueous based lubricant to be effective. Below the
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Fric
tio
n F
orc
e F
x (m
N)
Load L (mN)
Bare CM no SDS
Bare CM with0.36M SDS
CoF=0.26
CoF=0.05
8
63
critical concentration, there are insufficient particles in the confined zone between the
shearing surfaces, and thus the particles cannot effectively contribute to lower friction
through a rolling mechanism. However, above the critical concentration, the PNIPAm-
grafted CM remain in the confined region and are able to lower friction. We hypothesize
that as the temperature of the system is increased above the LCST, the surface of the
PNIPAm-grafted CM becomes more hydrophobic, causing aggregation (see Figure 31).
64
Figure 31. Cryo-SEM images PNIMAm-coated CM. (A) Low temperature, and (B)
high temperature samples with a concentration of 1 mg/ml PNIMAm-coated CM
particles.
Figure 31 shows cryo-SEM images of PNIMAm-coated CM at low and high temperatures.
A 1 mg/ml PNIMAm-coated CM sample was prepared. Half of the sample volume was
65
left at room temperature while the other half was heated to 50°C. Since the aggregation
process is irreversible once the temperature of the sample is increased (unless the sample
is sonicated to re-disperse the particles), cryo-SEM captured the state (i.e., aggregates or
singlets) of the particles. We were unable to quantify the degree of aggregation. Although
aggregates were present at both low and high temperatures, the number and size of
aggregates were larger in the high-temperature sample. In doing so, clusters of particles are
formed, thereby losing their ability to effectively lower friction by rolling.
Figure 32 summarizes the CoF data for aqueous-based lubricants of 4 different PNIPAm
grafted CM concentrations.
Figure 32. Bar chart summarizing the CoF values for the PNIPAm-grafted CM-based
aqueous lubricants at various concentrations below and above the LCST
A closer look at the raw friction data provides greater insight into the lubrication
mechanism. During a shear cycle, the load and shear speed are maintained at predetermined
values while the probe shears in one direction followed by retracing the same path for the
66
second half of the cycle. At the end of the cycle, the applied load is increased to a new
value (denoted by the step increase in the load as shown in Figure 33, right axis) and the
next shear cycle begins. Figure 33A shows the friction force as a function of time using 1
mg/mL aqueous PNIPAm grafted CM as the lubricant from a typical experiment.
Figure 33. Plot of the friction force as a function of time using (A) 1 mg/mL and (B)
10 mg/mL concentrations of PNIPAm-grafted CM-based aqueous lubricant at room
temperature (gray data) and high temperature (black data). The stepwise increase in
67
the applied load as a function of time is superimposed on the graph. The shear
distance is 10 mm, and the shear velocity is 0.5 mm/s. The friction force data for the
room temperature experiments have been offset by 2 s to facilitate the visualization
of the stiction spikes
At this concentration, the lubricant is not effective, and the friction forces are high. The
variation in the friction force is large (i.e., friction spikes are present during sliding)
indicative of intermittent contact between the borosilicate probe and the substrate. At this
concentration, there are insufficient particles in the confined region to reduce friction and
the friction forces are dominated by the interaction of the borosilicate probe and the silicon
surface. However, by increasing the concentration of the PNIPAmgrafted CM aqueous
lubricant to 5 mg/mL, the friction force drops by a factor of 7 and smooth sliding is
observed at room temperature. At this concentration, particles remain in the confined
region and are able to reduce friction. Stiction spikes are present when the probe changes
shear directions which indicate that the probe has to overcome an initial larger friction
force before sliding. The stiction spikes are even larger when the experiment is run at high
temperatures. We speculate that the stiction spike originates from the adhesive interaction
of the PNIPAm-grafted CM with the hydrophilic shearing surfaces within the confined
region (i.e., surface-particle adhesive forces). At high temperatures, particle aggregates are
present in the confined region which lead to even higher stiction spikes because of the
surface-particle adhesive forces in addition to the particle−particle interactions. In previous
work, Zheng et al87 demonstrated that phospholipid liposome coated silk microspheres with
well-hydrated headgroups provided effective aqueous based lubrication. The surface
hydration of the PNIPAm-grafted CM at room temperature is also consistent with
68
providing smaller stiction spikes. At a concentration of 10 mg/mL, no significant decrease
in the friction force is measured at room temperature. However, the magnitude of the
stiction spike in the friction data at high temperatures is significantly reduced. We attribute
this reduction to the presence of a higher concentration of individual particles (i.e., singlets)
within the confined region. Presumably, at low temperatures, a single population of
individual, well-dispersed PNIPAm-grafted CM are present. Hydration forces provide the
repulsive force contribution to stabilize the particle dispersion. At a temperature above the
LCST, a second population of particle aggregates begin to form in addition to the individual
dispersed particles. The latter are still effective at reducing friction through a rolling
mechanism; however, the particle aggregates, if present in the confined region, are
detrimental to the rolling mechanism. We speculate that at higher concentrations of
PNIPAm-grafted CM, a larger population of individual dispersed particles exists which
can contribute to lowering friction through a rolling mechanism. Larger aggregates are also
expected; however, because of their size, they are excluded from the confined region. The
reversibility of the process as a function of temperature was also investigated. It was found
that once the temperature of the PNIPAm-grafted CM aqueous lubricant was increased, the
lower CoF was not recovered when the temperature was reduced back to room temperature.
However, if the solution was sonicated, the low CoF was recovered at room temperature.
We believe that the aggregation process is not reversible, and instead, the clusters of
particles remain trapped in the aggregated state unless energy is added to the system to
break the clusters. Colloidal systems are inherently kinetically stable88. When temperature
in the PNIPAm-grafted CM aqueous lubricant system is increased, the attractive
interactions (due to hydrophobic interactions) between the PNIPAm-grafted CM increase,
69
which in turn sufficiently lower the energy barrier to initiate and facilitate aggregation.
When the temperature is decreased, the aggregates are initially at their lowest (or primarily
minimum) energy state and therefore external energy (in the form of sonication) is required
to overcome the energy barrier so as to allow the particles to reside once again in the
secondary minimum.
A schematic of the proposed mechanism by which the PNIPAm-grafted CM aqueous
lubricant influences friction is shown in Figure 34 under the various conditions.
Figure 34. Schematic illustration of the proposed mechanism by which PNIPAm-
grafted CM affect the lubrication between two shearing surfaces at low and high
temperatures and under low and high concentrations of PNIPAm-grafted CM
dispersed in water. The upper surface moves in the x-direction relative to the bottom
surface at a velocity Vx.
At low concentrations, intermittent contact is made between the shearing surfaces because
of the lack of individual PNIPAm grafted CM within the confined region. The confined
PNIPAm-grafted CM experience high pressures and are potentially more susceptible to
damage the PNIPAm-grafted layer. When the temperature is increased above the LCST,
70
the particles form aggregates which do not contribute to lowering friction and instead
further impede the movement of the shearing surfaces (i.e., the probe has to plow away the
aggregates at the leading front) leading to an increase in the CoF. At higher concentrations,
a larger number of individual PNIPAm-grafted CM are present in the confined region
which effectively reduce friction by a rolling mechanism. The compliance of the softer
PNIPAm coating leads to an increased contact area between the shearing surfaces and the
confined PNIPAm-grafted CM which produces an internal adhesive force contribution and
also leads to the stiction spikes during the onset of motion. In the smooth sliding regime,
the rolling of the individual particles is not affected by neighboring particles. However, at
high temperatures, the friction force increases since there is a smaller population of
individual PNIPAm-grafted CM in the confined region and furthermore, the presence of
particle aggregates impedes the movement of the shearing surfaces.
6.3 Conclusions
In this study, we explored the use of PNIPAm-grafted carbon microspheres (CM) dispersed
in water as a stimulus responsive lubricant. It was found that a critical concentration
between 3 and 5 mg/mL PNIPAm-grafted CM was needed to achieve low friction
(coefficient of friction ∼ 0.04) at room temperature. Higher concentrations of PNIPAm-
grafted CM above the critical concentration did not further reduce friction at room
temperature. An increase in the temperature of the system above the lower critical solution
temperature (LCST) caused the aggregation of PNIPAm-grafted CM which led to an
increase in friction forces for all concentrations of PNIPAm grafted CM in water. The
process was not immediately reversible unless the lubricant was sonicated so as to
redisperse the aggregates. A mechanism to explain the lubrication properties of PNIPAm-
71
grafted CM was proposed which pointed toward the need of particle singlets at sufficiently
high concentrations within the confined region to achieve low friction through a rolling
mechanism.
6.4 Future Direction
In this research work, we successfully proved that by grafting PNIPAm on Carbon
Microspheres, friction could be changed upon application of temperature as a trigger. For
this particular research, the size of particles, as well as the polymer density, was kept
constant. For future projects, I propose using Carbon Microspheres of the same size and
studying the friction of these bare particles on Si wafer with varying surface roughness. A
standard Si wafer has a surface roughness of RMS 1-2 nm. The spherical particles can
effectively roll on a rough surface, provided their rolling is not hampered. If the particle is
too small compared to the roughness, it might not be able to effectively roll over the
obstacle; thus, we can expect the friction to be higher (see image below).
Varying levels of surface roughness can be created using a combination of lithography and
Reactive Ion Etching (see image below).
1
Low friction
Effective rolling
2
High friction
Particle stuck, no rolling
72
Once the relationship between the surface roughness and the frictional behavior is
established, PNIPAm of the same grafting density and length as used in this research, can
be grafted on these particles to test their rolling friction. PNIPAm at room temperature
shows a fully extended chain structure. Thus at high surface roughness values, the bare
particles that cannot roll effectively, can be expected to roll and overcome the obstacles
with the help of the polymer chains.
Ion etching
Solvent
washing to
remove
photoresist
Patterned
Silicon wafer
Grafted Carbon Microspheres rolling effectively on surface asperities
73
Appendix I
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Fric
tio
n F
orc
e Fx
(m
N)
Load L (mN)
Bare CM noSDS
0.36M SDS noCM
Bare CM with0.36M SDS
Plot of Friction force Fx vs. Applied load L while shearing a spherical probe on
Silicon wafer using a)bare Carbon Microspheres (CM) in absence of Sodium Dodecyl
sulfate (SDS) b)an aqueous 0.36M SDS solution as a boundary lubricant c) Bare CM
in presence of 0.36M SDS
74
BIOGRAPHY
Shreyas Oak was born on July 13, 1991 in Mumbai, India. He received his Bachelor of
Technology (B.tech) in Oils, Oleochemicals and Surfactants from Institute of Chemical
Technology (ICT), India in 2013. After completing his undergraduate education, Shreyas
came to the USA to pursue his PhD program in the Department of Chemical and
Biomolecular Engineering at Tulane University, New Orleans in June of 2013. He served
as a Research Assistant in Dr. Noshir Pesika’s lab where learned numerous techniques such
as Surface Modification, Lithography, Material Property Testing, Electron Microscopy etc.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1 Blau, Peter J. "The significance and use of the friction coefficient." Tribology
International 34.9 (2001): 585-591.
2 Trangenstein, John A., and Phillip Colella. "A higher‐order Godunov method for
modeling finite deformation in elastic‐plastic solids." Communications on Pure and
Applied Mathematics 44.1 (1991): 41-100.
3 Rychlewski, J. (1984). On Hooke's law. Journal of Applied Mathematics and
Mechanics, 48(3), 303-314.
4 Murnaghan, Francis Dominic. "Finite deformations of an elastic solid." American
Journal of Mathematics 59.2 (1937): 235-260.
5 Schramm, Gebhard. A practical approach to rheology and rheometry. Karlsruhe: Haake,
1994.
6 Coussot, Philippe, et al. "Avalanche behavior in yield stress fluids." Physical review
letters 88.17 (2002): 175501.
75
7 Pritz, T. "Apparent complex Young's modulus of a longitudinally vibrating viscoelastic
rod." Journal of Sound and Vibration 77.1 (1981): 93-100.
8 Tidball, JAMES G., and THOMAS L. Daniel. "Elastic energy storage in rigored skeletal
muscle cells under physiological loading conditions." American Journal of Physiology-
Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 250.1 (1986): R56-R64.
9 Greco, Rita, and Giuseppe C. Marano. "Identification of parameters of Maxwell and
Kelvin–Voigt generalized models for fluid viscous dampers." Journal of Vibration and
Control 21.2 (2015): 260-274.
10 Vlassov, S., et al. "Adhesion and mechanical properties of PDMS-based materials
probed with AFM: A review." Reviews on Advanced Materials Science 56.1 (2018):
62-78.
11 Gruber, James V., et al. "Influence of cationic polysaccharides on polydimethylsiloxane
(PDMS) deposition onto keratin surfaces from a surfactant emulsified system." Colloids
and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 19.2 (2000): 127-135.
12 Gonsalves, Kenneth E. "Inorganic polymers. By JE Mark, HR Allcock and R. West,
Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1992, 272 pp., hardback, $71.75, ISBN 0‐13‐465881‐
7." Advanced Materials 5.1 (1993): 63-63.
13 Polydimethylsiloxane." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free
Encyclopedia, 20 Jan. 2020. Web. 1 Apr. 2020.
14 Mehra, Suraj Prakash. NPTEL.AC.IN. Strength of Materials.
15 Wu, Chen-En, Keng-Hui Lin, and Jia-Yang Juang. "Hertzian load–displacement
relation holds for spherical indentation on soft elastic solids undergoing large
deformations." Tribology International 97 (2016): 71-76.
76
16 Kim, Min Tae. "Influence of substrates on the elastic reaction of films for the
microindentation tests." Thin Solid Films 283.1-2 (1996): 12-16.
17 Domke, J., and M. Radmacher. 1998. Measuring the elastic properties of thin polymer
films with the atomic force microscope. Langmuir. 14: 3320–3325.
18 Dimitriadis, E. K., F. Horkay, J. Maresca, B. Kachar, and R. S. Chadwick. 2002.
Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force
microscope. Biophys. J. 82:2798–2810
19 Darling, Eric M., et al. "A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of
cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic
potential?." Biophysical journal 92.5 (2007): 1784-1791.
20 Wang, Zhixin, Alex A. Volinsky, and Nathan D. Gallant. "Crosslinking effect on
polydimethylsiloxane elastic modulus measured by custom‐built compression instrument."
Journal of Applied Polymer Science 131.22 (2014).
21 Stachowiak, Gwidon, and Andrew W. Batchelor. Engineering tribology. Butterworth-
Heinemann, 2013.
22 Amiri, Mehdi, and Michael M. Khonsari. "On the thermodynamics of friction and
wear―a review." Entropy 12.5 (2010): 1021-1049.
23 Hu, Yuan-zhong, Tian-bao Ma, and Hui Wang. "Energy dissipation in atomic-scale
friction." Friction 1.1 (2013): 24-40.
24 Persson, Bo NJ, et al. "On the nature of the static friction, kinetic friction and
creep." Wear 254.9 (2003): 835-851.
25 Blau, Peter J. "The significance and use of the friction coefficient." Tribology
International 34.9 (2001): 585-591.
77
26 Lee, Chul-Hee, and Andreas A. Polycarpou. "Static friction experiments and
verification of an improved elastic-plastic model including roughness effects." (2007):
754-760.
27 Hanaor, Dorian AH, Yixiang Gan, and Itai Einav. "Static friction at fractal
interfaces." Tribology International 93 (2016): 229-238.
28 Greenwood, James A., and JB Pl Williamson. "Contact of nominally flat
surfaces." Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series A. Mathematical and physical
sciences 295.1442 (1966): 300-319.
29 Persson, Bo NJ, and A. I. Volokitin. "Theory of rubber friction: Nonstationary
sliding." Physical Review B 65.13 (2002): 134106.
30 Persson, Bo NJ. Sliding friction: physical principles and applications. Springer Science
& Business Media, 2013.
31 Makkonen, Lasse. "A thermodynamic model of sliding friction." AIP Advances 2.1
(2012): 012179.
32 D. Dowson, V. Wright, Bio-tribology, in: Proceeding of the Conference on the
Rheology of Lubrication, The Institute of Petroleum, The Institution of Mechanical
Engineers, and the British Society of Rheology,
London, 1973, pp. 81–88.
33 Jost, H. Peter. "Tribology: How a word was coined 40 years ago." Tribology &
lubrication technology 62.3 (2006): 24.
34 Hirsch, Andreas. "The era of carbon allotropes." Nature materials 9.11 (2010):
868-871.
78
35 Mezzi, Alessio, and Saulius Kaciulis. "Surface investigation of carbon films: from
diamond to graphite." Surface and interface analysis 42.6‐7 (2010): 1082-1084.
36 Kharisov, Boris Ildusovich, and Oxana Vasilievna Kharissova. Carbon Allotropes:
Metal-Complex Chemistry, Properties and Applications. Springer, 2019.
37 Kroto, Harold W., and David RM Walton. "Stable derivatives of small
fullerenes." Chemical physics letters 214.3-4 (1993): 353-356.
38 Richter, Henning, et al. "Large scale combustion synthesis of single-walled carbon
nanotubes and their characterization." Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology 8.11
(2008): 6065-6074.
39 Duplock, Elizabeth J., Matthias Scheffler, and Philip JD Lindan. "Hallmark of perfect
graphene." Physical review letters 92.22 (2004): 225502.
40 Baughman, Ray H., Anvar A. Zakhidov, and Walt A. De Heer. "Carbon nanotubes--the
route toward applications." science 297.5582 (2002): 787-792.
41 Crevillén, A. G., et al. "Microfluidic Chips With Electrochemical Detectors Based On
Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes As Flow Injection And Separation Electrokinetic Driven
Systems." (2009).
42 Scarselli, Ma, P. Castrucci, and M. De Crescenzi. "Electronic and optoelectronic nano-
devices based on carbon nanotubes." Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 24.31 (2012):
313202.
43 Louie, Steven G. "Electronic properties, junctions, and defects of carbon
nanotubes." Carbon nanotubes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001. 113-145.
79
44 Gao, Guanghua, Tahir Cagin, and William A. Goddard III. "Energetics, structure,
mechanical and vibrational properties of single-walled carbon
nanotubes." Nanotechnology 9.3 (1998): 184.
45 Wong, Eric W., Paul E. Sheehan, and Charles M. Lieber. "Nanobeam mechanics:
elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorods and nanotubes." science 277.5334 (1997):
1971-1975.
46 Camisasca, Adalberto, and Silvia Giordani. "Carbon nano-onions in biomedical
applications: Promising theranostic agents." Inorganica Chimica Acta 468 (2017): 67-76.
47 Iijima, Sumio. "Direct observation of the tetrahedral bonding in graphitized carbon
black by high resolution electron microscopy." Journal of Crystal Growth 50.3 (1980):
675-683.
48 Ugarte, Daniel. "Curling and closure of graphitic networks under electron-beam
irradiation." Nature 359.6397 (1992): 707-709.
49 Wang, Heng-Zhi, et al. "In situ electron microscope study on the formation and
morphological evolution of carbon aggregates." Carbon 40.12 (2002): 2117-2124.
50 Tomita, Satoshi, et al. "Structure and electronic properties of carbon onions." The
Journal of Chemical Physics 114.17 (2001): 7477-7482.
51 Sano, Noboru, et al. "Synthesis of carbon'onions' in water." Nature 414.6863 (2001):
506-507.
52 Cabioc'h, Th, J. P. Riviere, and J. Delafond. "A new technique for fullerene onion
formation." Journal of materials science 30.19 (1995): 4787-4792.
53 Chen, X. H., et al. "New method of carbon onion growth by radio-frequency plasma-
enhanced chemical vapor deposition." Chemical physics letters 336.3-4 (2001): 201-204.
80
54 Vidu, Ruxandra, et al. "Nanostructures: a platform for brain repair and
augmentation." Frontiers in systems neuroscience 8 (2014): 91.
55 Ugarte, D. "Onion-like graphitic particles." Carbon 33.7 (1995): 989-993.
56 Yadav, B. C., and Ritesh Kumar. "Structure, properties and applications of
fullerenes." International Journal of Nanotechnology and Applications 2.1 (2008): 15-24.
57 Eletskiĭ, A. V., and Boris M. Smirnov. "Fullerenes." Physics-Uspekhi 36.3 (1993): 202.
58 Ignatov, Ignat, and Oleg Mosin. "The Methods of Non-Equilibrium Spectrum (NES)
and Differential Non-Equilibrium Spectrum (DNES) in Studying the Interaction of
Carbonaceous Mmineral Shungite and Aluminosilicate Mineral Zeolite with Water."
Methods 5 (2014).
59 Klein, Douglas J., et al. "Resonance in C60 buckminsterfullerene." Journal of the
American Chemical Society 108.6 (1986): 1301-1302.
60 Pandeya, S. N., et al. "Chemistry of Fullerene and It's Application: A Review." Asian
Journal of Research in Chemistry 3.2 (2010): 234-242.
61 Thakral, Seema, and R. M. Mehta. "Fullerenes: An introduction and overview of their
biological properties." Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences 68.1 (2006): 13.
62 Gopakumar, G., Minh Tho Nguyen, and Arnout Ceulemans. "The boron buckyball has
an unexpected Th symmetry." Chemical Physics Letters 450.4-6 (2008): 175-177.
63 Chatterjee, A., and B. L. Deopura. "Carbon nanotubes and nanofibre: an
overview." Fibers and Polymers 3.4 (2002): 134-139.
64 Guadagno, Liberata, et al. "The role of carbon nanofiber defects on the electrical and
mechanical properties of CNF-based resins." Nanotechnology 24.30 (2013): 305704.
81
65 Llobet, Eduard. "Gas sensors using carbon nanomaterials: A review." Sensors and
Actuators B: Chemical 179 (2013): 32-45.
66 Zhang, Yifu. "Synthesis and characterization of hollow V2O5 microspheres for
supercapacitor electrode with pseudocapacitance." Materials Science-Poland 35.1 (2017):
188-196.
67 Liu, Fang, and Marek W. Urban. "Recent advances and challenges in designing stimuli-
responsive polymers." Progress in polymer science 35.1-2 (2010): 3-23.
68 Braun, O. M. Simple model of microscopic rolling friction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95
(12), 126104 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.126104.
69 Braun, O. M.; Tosatti, E. Molecular rolling friction: the cogwheel model. J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter 2008, 20 (35), 354007.
70 Rapoport, L.; Fleischer, N.; Tenne, R. Fullerene-like WS2 nanoparticles: Superior
lubricants for harsh conditions. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15 (7−8), 651−655
71 Yao, Y. L.; Wang, X. M.; Guo, J. J.; Yang, X. W.; Xu, B. S. Tribological property of
onion-like fullerenes as lubricant additive. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62 (15), 2524−2527.
72 St Dennis, J. E.; Jin, K.; John, V. T.; Pesika, N. S. Carbon Microspheres as Ball Bearings
in Aqueous-Based Lubrication. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3 (7), 2215−2218.
73 Cheng, G. G.; Dong, L. J.; Kamboj, L.; Khosla, T.; Wang, X. D.; Zhang, Z. Q.; Guo, L.
Q.; Pesika, N.; Ding, J. N. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Monodisperse Hard Carbon Spheres
and Their WaterBased Lubrication. Tribol. Lett. 2017, 65 (4), 923 DOI: 10.1007/ s11249-
017-0923-8.
74 Cheng, G. G.; Jiang, S. Y.; Khosla, T.; Pesika, N. S.; Ding, J. N.; Zhang, Y. H.; Wang,
Y. Synthesis of Hard Carbon/Iron Microspheres and Their Aqueous-Based Tribological
82
Performance Under Magnetic Field. Tribol. Lett. 2016, 64 (3), 782 DOI: 10.1007/s11249-
016-07828.
75 Cumings, J.; Zettl, A. Low-friction nanoscale linear bearing realized from multiwall
carbon nanotubes. Science 2000, 289 (5479), 602−604.
76 Akbulut, M.; Belman, N.; Golan, Y.; Israelachvili, J. Frictional properties of confined
nanorods. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18 (19), 2589.
77 Chen, T.; Ferris, R.; Zhang, J. M.; Ducker, R.; Zauscher, S. Stimulus-responsive
polymer brushes on surfaces: Transduction mechanisms and applications. Prog. Polym.
Sci. 2010, 35 (1−2), 94−112.
78 Wu, Y.; Cai, M. R.; Pei, X. W.; Liang, Y. M.; Zhou, F. Switching Friction with
ThermalResponsive Gels. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013, 34 (22), 1785−1790.
79 Alarcon, C. D. H.; Pennadam, S.; Alexander, C. Stimuli responsive polymers for
biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34 (3), 276−285
80 Park, C. Y.; Lee, Y. G.; Oh, C.; Oh, S. G. Preparation of poly(NIPAM) grafted hybrid
silica particles with hollow structure in emulsion. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2010, 16 (1), 32−38.
81 Bischofberger, I.; Trappe, V. New aspects in the phase behaviour of poly-N-isopropyl
acrylamide: systematic temperature dependent shrinking of PNiPAM assemblies well
beyond the LCST. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15520 DOI: 10.1038/srep15520.
82 Chen, Q.; Kooij, E. S.; Sui, X. F.; Padberg, C. J.; Hempenius, M. A.; Schon, P. M.;
Vancso, G. J. Collapse from the top: brushes of poly-(N-isopropylacrylamide) in co-
nonsolvent mixtures. Soft Matter 2014, 10 (17), 3134−3142.
83 Wang, Q.; Li, H.; Chen, L. Q.; Huang, X. J. Monodispersed hard carbon spherules with
uniform nanopores. Carbon 2001, 39 (14), 2211−2214.
83
84 Ryu, J.; Suh, Y. W.; Suh, D. J.; Ahn, D. J. Hydrothermal preparation of carbon
microspheres from mono-saccharides and phenolic compounds. Carbon 2010, 48 (7),
1990−1998.
85 Deshmukh, A. A.; Mhlanga, S. D.; Coville, N. J. Carbon spheres. Mater. Sci. Eng., R
2010, 70 (1−2), 1−28.
86 Derjaguin, B.V.; Toporov, Yu.P. The Role of Adhesion in the Rolling and Sliding
Friction of Polymers. Prog. Surf. Sci. 1994, 45 (1− 4), 308−316.
87 Zheng, R. B.; Zhan, J. J.; Wang, X. Q.; Kaplan, D.; Pesika, N.; John, V. T. Lubrication
Properties of Phospholipid Liposome Coated Silk Microspheres. Part Part Syst. Char 2013,
30 (2), 133−137.
88 Israelachvili, J. N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: 2011.