MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse...
-
Upload
tyler-brooks -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse...
MEC: Customer Profitability Models
TopicDSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability
Jesse Langston, OG&EOct 20th 2013
Situation
Current State
•Current EE programs focus on customer savings and cost recovery, but not earnings
•Metrics for Regulatory commissions focuses on energy reductions rather than demand reductions
•Utilities investing in a significant level of technology but may not be taking full advantage
• Smart Meters / Dumb Rates• Smarter demand side options
How can we build profitable model business models in this dynamic
environment?
How do we balance the needs for cost recovery and also innovate?
MEC Questions
OG&E Shifting Emphasis from EE to DR Programs
• Serves 800,000 customers in Oklahoma and Arkansas.
• Demand Response– 80,000 Customer – Dynamic Pricing– No Direct Load Control– Smart Grid Integrated
• Energy Efficiency Programs– Lost Revenue & Incentives
• Other– RTP, GFB, Wind and Rate tamer
4
DR overall value to customer is high and behavior is predictable (Future dispatchable program?)
2012 and 2013 OG&E Smart-hours program results
5
When given the option, 73% of customers would choose according to their personal preferences vs. standard tariffs
2013 OG&E conjoint study
Today Tomorrow
Next Gen
ROI& Risk
MEC Question: How can we build profitable model business models in this dynamic
environment?
Home Energy Efficiency
Commercial Standard
Offer
Smarthours Thermostat
Price ResponseSmart Grid
Integrated LED Lighting
Guaranteed Flat Bill
Solar PV installatio
n
Community Renewable with Price Guarantee
Smart Grid as a Utility Service
Smart Grid Integrated LED
Lighting
High Efficiency Lighting
Integrated Volt Var
Control
Implemented programs
Programs under development
Yesterday
Today
Tomorrow
ROI& Risk
OG&E Product and Service Evolution
MEC Question: How do we balance the needs for
cost recovery and also innovate?
Program Category
Program Example
Annual Investment
Investment Type
Regulatory Treatment
Per Participant
Benefit
Non Participant
Impact
Net Program Contribution
to Net income
Income Contribution
Source
Range of Return
Uncertainty
Traditional DSM
Weatherization
$5.6MMContractor Services
Program Cost
Recovery; Lost Margin Recovery;
Performance Incentive
2752 KwH savings;
$1979 rebate
6.8 Million Kwh 1.23 TRC
$75K Program
Incentive Very Low
Capital Investment Demand Response
Smarthours (Thermostats
with Price response)
$14.4MM
Capital for Thermostats
and Installation
Program Cost
Recovery; Lost Margin Recovery; Return on Invested Capital
$200 annual bill savings
53MW from system peak
1.18 TRC$1.1MM
Return of invested capital
Low
Below the Line Customer Programs
Guaranteed Flat Bill
$212K
Marketing Promotion
and Administratio
n
Customers rebilled on standard
rate; Shareholders take risk
on difference
Price security of fixed bill
NA $2.0MMRisk
adjustment to bill
High
Partnership Venture Programs
Smart Grid as a Service (Municipal
Utility)
$1.8MMAdditional Network Facilities
Permission to use utility
regulated assets
Reduced operational
benefits $8.7MM NPV
Reduced network cost
for OG&E customers $650 NPV
$250K Service Fees Moderate
9
The “Secret Sauce” is having a product plan continuum that meets broad customer needs
Smart Grid Enhanced
*
10
Keys for success • Ability to effectively market
and offer strong customer value
• Requires effective regulatory strategy
• Ability to evolve as technology improves
• Flexibility to improve business models and market approach